| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Kurt Nicklas" |
| Date: |
09 Nov 2006 06:20:49 AM |
| Object: |
#Did anyone else predict the election? |
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
.
|
|
| User: "Martin McPhillips" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 08:41:27 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1163074849.881871.67380@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
I had no prediction except that I believed that
Democrats had all the skills necessary
to lose even a sixth-year midterm.
My advice to them was to pretend that they
weren't insane, for a few weeks at least,
and let the historical cycle work for them.
They appear to have done just that.
I expect them to revert to form, however.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Toby" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 08:27:02 PM |
|
|
"Martin McPhillips" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:r6H4h.17252$Fw5.9927@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com...
"Kurt Nicklas" <nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1163074849.881871.67380@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
I had no prediction except that I believed that
Democrats had all the skills necessary
to lose even a sixth-year midterm.
My advice to them was to pretend that they
weren't insane, for a few weeks at least,
and let the historical cycle work for them.
They appear to have done just that.
I expect them to revert to form, however.
The Repubs crashed and burned based on the deficiencies in their vision and
praxis. Now it is the Dems turn to disappoint. It's cyclical.
Toby
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 09:20:39 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:41:27 GMT, "Martin McPhillips"
<nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1163074849.881871.67380@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
I had no prediction
You haven't got a brain McFly
Trying to predict is as stupid as answering Knickkers.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
11 Nov 2006 03:23:52 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
I didn't make any specific predictions but I knew that Limbaugh and
Hannity were full of crap when they said that the polls were wrong and
Repubs wouldn't do so bad.
You'd have to be blind to not see that America knows how futile it is
to sacrifice so many American lives and billions of dollars trying to
"build democracy" in a worthless ***** hole like Iraq. We won the war
when Hussein was caught and we knew they had no WMDs. We should
have celebrated the victory and got the ***** out of there back then
instead of this pointless "stay the course" policy.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Idoso" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
11 Nov 2006 10:28:04 AM |
|
|
Kurt Nicklas schreef:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
No, only the Bible: (Daniel 2:44) 44 "And in the days of those kings
the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to
ruin. And the kingdom itself will not be passed on to any other people.
It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, and it itself will
stand to times indefinite. . .
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
11 Nov 2006 11:52:42 PM |
|
|
On 11 Nov 2006 08:28:04 -0800, "Idoso" <driekous@gmail.com> wrote:
Kurt Nicklas schreef:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
No, only the Bible
IOW, plain no.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
11 Nov 2006 03:32:24 AM |
|
|
Kurt Nicklas wrote:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
[...]
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
Yes, back in December of 2005. I was wrong. I predicted "small"
gains for the Democrats. That may prove to be correct in a few
years time -- as a number of Democrats in what are effectively
Republican disticts run for re-election against Republican
candidates that are not racked by scandal. But, for now, the
gains are real (and large) enough.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "zzpat" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 12:24:21 PM |
|
|
Kurt Nicklas wrote:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
I did. I said Dems would pick up the House and have a majority in the
senate. I also said the House would be a blow-out, but I wrongly
predicted Dems would have a two-seat majority in the senate. I got
Tenn. wrong.
--
Pat
Impeach Bush
http://zzpat.bravehost.com/
Articles of Impeachment
Center for Constitutional Rights
http://zzpat.bravehost.com/april_2006/articles_of_impeachment.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 04:38:11 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:24:21 -0600, zzpat <zzpatrick@gmail.com> wrote:
Kurt Nicklas wrote:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
I did. I said Dems would pick up the House and have a majority in the
senate. I also said the House would be a blow-out, but I wrongly
predicted Dems would have a two-seat majority in the senate. I got
Tenn. wrong.
You have to fudge a little bit. Otherwise people will think that you
actually knew the results in advance. <weg>
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"...I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand
why I dismiss yours."
- Stephen F. Roberts
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 09:19:54 AM |
|
|
On 9 Nov 2006 04:20:49 -0800, "Kurt Nicklas"
<nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
A couple of years ago, you were "predicting" a lot of
things, KNICKKKERS
But then you got drunk and forgot about Caller ID when
you made dozens of Late-night, hang-up phone calls.
(CLICK)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 04:06:44 PM |
|
|
On 9 Nov 2006 04:20:49 -0800, "Kurt Nicklas" <nicklask@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
I don't make predictions, but it was pretty clear that the Republicans
were going to have to be punished for their bad behavior sooner or
later. I believe that if they managed to squeak through this election
they would have lost any opportunity to win anything in 2008...
At last now the voting public will get a good chance to see the bad
behavior of the Democrats and the Republicans can see if they can
produce something of value to look at in 2008.
.
|
|
|
| User: " Kurt Lochner Weasels Remember!" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? *>LOL!<* |
10 Nov 2006 10:29:40 AM |
|
|
"everbore" <sleazecanyon@yoohoo.nut> whined laboriously about how:
[..]
I don't make predictions, [..]
*>LOL!<* Sure you don't, just like your "magnetic capacitors"..
From: "stevencanyon@yahoo.com" <stevencanyon@yahoo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.156.16.203
Target Name: AC9C10CB.ipt.aol.com IP: 172.156.16.203
"Lying to the exit polls is a lot of fun, actually,
It's fun to get the lefties all excited thinking
they've won before watching them crash and burn...."
Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:51:20 -0500
--Blast from the past..
________________________________________________________________
Steven Canyon <Gall@dog.soldiers> Tue, 06 Aug 2002 13:40:33 GMT
news:<b9avkuouvrkd3o6ghd1kppjhg6kespmdc9%404ax.com>
"A capacitor *is* an open circuit....like a transformer....
both depend on a changing magnetic field to work.."
--
Steven Canyon <Gall@dog.soldiers> Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:57:55 GMT
news:<0t87lu46blkiotfgan5jruug8u8a9alkp1@4ax.com>
"The only time capacitors are doing anything they have
significant magnetic fields, Lochner."
"[..]and now you can't find a capacitor without
magnetism, either"
--
Steven Canyon <Gall@dog.soldiers> Mon, 12 Aug 2002 03:30:14 GMT
news:<og8elu4eaudlftq935dc4pipovuh7lcsl9@4ax.com>
"any and all capacitors work on the principal of magnetism...."
--
Steven Canyon <Gall@dog.soldiers> Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:57:10 GMT
news:<jc1iluog2emtkjqso8ob0diubt5tdri42v@4ax.com>
"the references to capacitors in that cite had nothing
to do with my claims about capacitors,[..]"
____________________________________________________________________
Do you know what a Coulomb is, Crayon?
Tell us what units of measure it takes on..
Tell you what, Crayon. Tell us how much 'magnetic flux'
is generated by charging a 1.0F cap to 5.0 Volts, then tell
us about how much electrostatic force would be present..
What's the repulsive force between two charged masses of 100 Coulombs
each at a distance of 1.0 centimeter, Porkie. Now, tell us how many
Gauss it would take for a pair of magnets to repel each other with
as much force..
Put your answers right here---> _______________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? *>LOL!<* |
10 Nov 2006 10:57:15 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:29:40 -0600, " Kurt Lochner (Weasels
Remember!)" <kurt_lochner@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
"everbore" <sleazecanyon@yoohoo.nut> whined laboriously about how:
[..]
I don't make predictions, [..]
*>LOL!<* Sure you don't, just like your "magnetic capacitors"..
He's right - in the Bizarro world capacitors are magnetic and
inductors are electrostatic. Transformers work by magic, though,
since electrostatic fields don't interact the way electromagnetic ones
do. But transpacitors work by coupled magnetic field.
From: "stevencanyon@yahoo.com" <stevencanyon@yahoo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.156.16.203
Target Name: AC9C10CB.ipt.aol.com IP: 172.156.16.203
"Lying to the exit polls is a lot of fun, actually,
It's fun to get the lefties all excited thinking
they've won before watching them crash and burn...."
Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:51:20 -0500
Hey, that's just like what we did this time - voting Republican before
we hacked into all those voting machines and changed the results. Too
bad the media is so leftist and didn't report that the Rethugs had
retained both seats. The "correction" would have given a lot of the
Reich wing strokes.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"So much blood has been shed by the Church because of an omission from the Gospel: "Ye
shall be indifferent as to what your neighbor's religion is." Not merely tolerant of it,
but indifferent to it. Divinity is claimed for many religions; but no religion is great
enough or divine enough to add that new law to its code."
- Mark Twain, a Biography
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
.
|
|
|
| User: " Kurt Lochner" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? *>LOL!<* |
10 Nov 2006 06:08:34 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
Kurt Lochner (Weasels Remember!) was musing at the drooling from:
"everbore" <sleazecanyon@yoohoo.nut> whined laboriously about how:
[..]
I don't make predictions, [..]
*>LOL!<* Sure you don't, just like your "magnetic capacitors"..
He's right - in the Bizarro world capacitors are magnetic and
inductors are electrostatic. Transformers work by magic, though,
since electrostatic fields don't interact the way electromagnetic
ones do. But transpacitors work by coupled magnetic field.
Yeah, where do you think "wavelets" come from?
From: "stevencanyon@yahoo.com" <stevencanyon@yahoo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.156.16.203
Target Name: AC9C10CB.ipt.aol.com IP: 172.156.16.203
"Lying to the exit polls is a lot of fun, actually,
It's fun to get the lefties all excited thinking
they've won before watching them crash and burn...."
Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:51:20 -0500
Hey, that's just like what we did this time - voting Republican
before we hacked into all those voting machines and changed the
results.
With the Transbeta OS, it was almost too easy, like they wanted
us to put them out of our misery. It was a courageous effort,
and many a brave electron gave it's life to the cause..
Too bad the media is so leftist and didn't report that the
Rethugs had retained both seats. The "correction" would
have given a lot of the Reich wing strokes.
Those damned leftist whores at Faux News again, no doubt..
--Some days it just doesn't pay to get out of the voting booth..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? *>LOL!<* |
10 Nov 2006 08:44:45 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:08:34 -0600, " Kurt Lochner"
<kurt_lochner@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
Kurt Lochner (Weasels Remember!) was musing at the drooling from:
"everbore" <sleazecanyon@yoohoo.nut> whined laboriously about how:
[..]
I don't make predictions, [..]
*>LOL!<* Sure you don't, just like your "magnetic capacitors"..
He's right - in the Bizarro world capacitors are magnetic and
inductors are electrostatic. Transformers work by magic, though,
since electrostatic fields don't interact the way electromagnetic
ones do. But transpacitors work by coupled magnetic field.
Yeah, where do you think "wavelets" come from?
Waveformers? Wavacitors? Wavicles? Wavy Gravy?
Those damned leftist whores at Faux News again, no doubt..
Oh, definitely.
--Some days it just doesn't pay to get out of the voting booth..
Booth? I connected to the machines via internet and sat in the
comfort of my home. It's the 21st century, you know. Modern
hanky-panky.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I am a deeply religious nonbeliever.... This is a somewhat new kind of religion."
- Letter to Hans Muehsam March 30, 1954; Einstein Archive 38-434
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: " Kurt Lochner" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? *>LOL!<* |
11 Nov 2006 10:22:41 AM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
Kurt Lochner replied with some whimsy:
Al Klein wrote:
Kurt Lochner (Weasels Remember!) was musing at the drooling from:
"everbore" <sleazecanyon@yoohoo.nut> whined laboriously about how:
[..]
I don't make predictions, [..]
*>LOL!<* Sure you don't, just like your "magnetic capacitors"..
He's right - in the Bizarro world capacitors are magnetic and
inductors are electrostatic. Transformers work by magic, though,
since electrostatic fields don't interact the way electromagnetic
ones do. But transpacitors work by coupled magnetic field.
Yeah, where do you think "wavelets" come from?
Waveformers? Wavacitors? Wavicles? Wavy Gravy?
"coupled magnetic fields" is just another way to say
"coulombic copulations" as far as sub-atomic interactions go..
Hence, "wavelets". And you know what those grow up to be..
Those damned leftist whores at Faux News again, no doubt..
Oh, definitely.
And Consistantly Neutered News, Massively Stupid Naughty Bits
Communications, hell, even the Home Shipping Newtorque was in on it..
--Some days it just doesn't pay to get out of the voting booth..
Booth? I connected to the machines via internet and sat in
the comfort of my home. It's the 21st century, you know.
Shhhhh... Don't tell the "neoconservatives" that, they still
think it's the Dark Ages with a time tunnel to 1930's Germany..
Modern hanky-panky.
Without a doubt, mon..
--Writing the "Just Don't Get It Blues".. (no kidding!)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? *>LOL!<* |
11 Nov 2006 12:06:37 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:22:41 -0600, " Kurt Lochner"
<kurt_lochner@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
Kurt Lochner replied with some whimsy:
Al Klein wrote:
Kurt Lochner (Weasels Remember!) was musing at the drooling from:
"everbore" <sleazecanyon@yoohoo.nut> whined laboriously about how:
[..]
I don't make predictions, [..]
*>LOL!<* Sure you don't, just like your "magnetic capacitors"..
He's right - in the Bizarro world capacitors are magnetic and
inductors are electrostatic. Transformers work by magic, though,
since electrostatic fields don't interact the way electromagnetic
ones do. But transpacitors work by coupled magnetic field.
Yeah, where do you think "wavelets" come from?
Waveformers? Wavacitors? Wavicles? Wavy Gravy?
"coupled magnetic fields" is just another way to say
"coulombic copulations" as far as sub-atomic interactions go..
Hence, "wavelets". And you know what those grow up to be..
Electronic tsunamis.
--Writing the "Just Don't Get It Blues".. (no kidding!)
The 2008 Rethug theme song?
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my
contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him, the
spinal cord would fully suffice."
- Albert Einstein
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 05:08:09 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:06:44 -0500, nevermore
<stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
At last now the voting public will get a good chance to see the bad
behavior of the Democrats and the Republicans can see if they can
produce something of value to look at in 2008.
I don't think enough of the public will be fooled any more. If the
Republicans and the president deadlock the country, the people will
see it for what it is - sour grapes - and fix the actual problem in
2008, when a lot more Republican seats become vulnerable.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I want you to just let a wave of intolerance wash over you. I want
you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate is good...Our
goal is a Christian nation. We have a Biblical duty, we are called by
God, to conquer this country. We don't want equal time. We don't want
pluralism."
-Randall Terry, Founder of Operation Rescue, The News-Sentinel, Fort
Wayne, Indiana, 8-16-93
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 06:01:53 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:08:09 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:06:44 -0500, nevermore
<stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
At last now the voting public will get a good chance to see the bad
behavior of the Democrats and the Republicans can see if they can
produce something of value to look at in 2008.
I don't think enough of the public will be fooled any more. If the
Republicans and the president deadlock the country, the people will
see it for what it is - sour grapes - and fix the actual problem in
2008, when a lot more Republican seats become vulnerable.
The people are not going to tolerate any foolishness from this
Congress. They were elected to get things done.... There is likely
going to be some problems develop in the Democrat ranks between the
moderates that were just elected and some of the old liberals... and
that doesn't even address the potential problems between the old
liberals and the President...
I'm really looking forward to the next two years..
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
10 Nov 2006 03:39:06 AM |
|
|
nevermore wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:08:09 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:06:44 -0500, nevermore
<stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
At last now the voting public will get a good chance to see the bad
behavior of the Democrats and the Republicans can see if they can
produce something of value to look at in 2008.
I don't think enough of the public will be fooled any more.
What difference does it make if they are fooled? They haven't any
choice.
The people are not going to tolerate any foolishness from this
Congress.
Sure they will. What choice do they have?
They were elected to get things done....
We've all been through this before.
There is likely
going to be some problems develop in the Democrat ranks between the
moderates that were just elected and some of the old liberals... and
that doesn't even address the potential problems between the old
liberals and the President...
I'm really looking forward to the next two years..
Nothing much will happen but talk. Nothing will improve. This will be
much better than the past six years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
10 Nov 2006 05:31:06 AM |
|
|
On 10 Nov 2006 01:39:06 -0800, wrote:
nevermore wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:08:09 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:06:44 -0500, nevermore
<stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
At last now the voting public will get a good chance to see the bad
behavior of the Democrats and the Republicans can see if they can
produce something of value to look at in 2008.
I don't think enough of the public will be fooled any more.
What difference does it make if they are fooled? They haven't any
choice.
The people are not going to tolerate any foolishness from this
Congress.
Sure they will. What choice do they have?
They were elected to get things done....
We've all been through this before.
There is likely
going to be some problems develop in the Democrat ranks between the
moderates that were just elected and some of the old liberals... and
that doesn't even address the potential problems between the old
liberals and the President...
I'm really looking forward to the next two years..
Nothing much will happen but talk. Nothing will improve. This will be
much better than the past six years.
<sigh> we can hope, can't we?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
10 Nov 2006 07:56:18 AM |
|
|
On 10 Nov 2006 01:39:06 -0800, wrote:
nevermore wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:08:09 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:06:44 -0500, nevermore
<stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
At last now the voting public will get a good chance to see the bad
behavior of the Democrats and the Republicans can see if they can
produce something of value to look at in 2008.
I don't think enough of the public will be fooled any more.
What difference does it make if they are fooled? They haven't any
choice.
If they're fooled there'll be a Republican sweep in 2008. If they
aren't there won't be.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
.
|
|
|
| User: "john smith nom de guerre" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
10 Nov 2006 08:38:32 AM |
|
|
Al Klein skrev:
On 10 Nov 2006 01:39:06 -0800, wrote:
nevermore wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:08:09 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:06:44 -0500, nevermore
<stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
At last now the voting public will get a good chance to see the bad
behavior of the Democrats and the Republicans can see if they can
produce something of value to look at in 2008.
I don't think enough of the public will be fooled any more.
What difference does it make if they are fooled? They haven't any
choice.
If they're fooled there'll be a Republican sweep in 2008. If they
aren't there won't be.
"Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice... uh, fool...uh cant be
fooled twice"
how many percent of you guys voted this time?
Just heard in the news it was almost a new all time record or sumptin.
:)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
10 Nov 2006 10:44:27 AM |
|
|
On 10 Nov 2006 06:38:32 -0800, "john smith (nom de guerre)"
<lagerboks@yahoo.com> wrote:
how many percent of you guys voted this time?
Just heard in the news it was almost a new all time record or sumptin.
Probably. For the world's first modern democracy, we don't seem to
take it seriously.
But they seem to get a little annoyed when I suggest that maybe I can
vote for a few people who don't seem to care enough to come out. After
all, there MUST be another hundred people who'd vote just like me. :)
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I can't activate two neurons simultaneously, and I vote"
- The theistic majority
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: #Did anyone else predict the election? |
09 Nov 2006 03:38:39 PM |
|
|
On 9 Nov 2006 04:20:49 -0800, "Kurt Nicklas" <nicklask@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
Back in September, I predicted the result:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/browse_frm/thread/b649bbeb86056c0e/c7483e62b8831e2d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#c7483e62b8831e2d
Did anyone else here on Usenet do the same?
I've been saying (frequently in response to full-fledged Usenet Kook
Daniel Joseph Min) for several months that the Dems were going to
re-take both houses of Congress. Can't be bothered to Google it at the
moment.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
