Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?



 Religions > Atheism > Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Truth Hunter"
Date: 24 Jun 2006 02:31:11 PM
Object: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?
Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?
One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.
My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?
http://www.jewsforjudaism.org
Bumper Sticker
DIVINE INSANITY
God killed himself on the cross to save his own creation fro=ADm his own
wrath! (Author unknown)
One God, father-son-ghost?
Holy Trinity "Me, Myself, and I"
Triune god: "Buy one god, get two free"
There is no copyright to this post or its contents anything can be
taken from this post without permission.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 24 Jun 2006 04:54:28 PM
When, with the right mind you can understand who Christ is
and what his prerogatives are according to the ORACLES entrusted to
the jews,
then you would need not to guess...
Truth Hunter wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?






http://www.jewsforjudaism.org


Bumper Sticker


DIVINE INSANITY
God killed himself on the cross to save his own creation fro=ADm his own
wrath! (Author unknown)


One God, father-son-ghost?


Holy Trinity "Me, Myself, and I"


Triune god: "Buy one god, get two free"



There is no copyright to this post or its contents anything can be
taken from this post without permission.

.

User: "Michelle Malkin"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 25 Jun 2006 02:54:54 AM
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151177471.283437.295050@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?
One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.
My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?
How about proving that your Jesus ever existed
before you worry about the rest.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 26 Jun 2006 11:56:01 PM
Michelle Malkin wrote:

"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151177471.283437.295050@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?

One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man....

.....amd if yer can swallow that load of mythical nonsense yer can swallow
anything !



My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?

<GROAN>



How about proving that your Jesus ever existed
before you worry about the rest.

Absolutely



--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^

.


User: "Eric Brze"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 24 Jun 2006 03:40:51 PM
On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?

Miracle is not magic. Divine power is not magical power.
Divine power is the power of truth and love. It is by such power Jesus
preached his message and confronted the Jewish religious authorities.







http://www.jewsforjudaism.org


Bumper Sticker


DIVINE INSANITY
God killed himself on the cross to save his own creation fro-m his own
wrath! (Author unknown)


One God, father-son-ghost?


Holy Trinity "Me, Myself, and I"


Triune god: "Buy one god, get two free"



There is no copyright to this post or its contents anything can be
taken from this post without permission.

.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 24 Jun 2006 05:15:46 PM
"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


Does the Pope poop in the woods?

One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate.

Let me see if I got this correct. There was a 1st-century Jew named Jesus
who is *thought* to have been the creator of the universe hiding in only
what *looked* to be a human body to everyone around him, and *really* was
human except for the fact that he could, allegedly, walk on water and raise
people from the dead in a way no other humans could.
Am I 'on track' with this right so far?
(he was still

God, but he acted as if he were man.

Are you implying that 'God' was 'possessed' by a human creature 'thingie'
named 'Jesus', or is it the other way around. I'm confused.
Jesus was as powerless as any

other man.

Whoa! Hold on there, Hombre. I don't think causing a fig tree that had the
temerity *not* to produce figs out of season, simply by wiggling his nose is
*not* exactly 'powerless'. If you catch my 'drift'.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?

That's a toughie. Let's see. Did Jesus have the ability to perform
'miracles'? Well let's look at the facts: We know that he turned water into
wine at Cana. We also know that he walked on water -- and even transferred
that ability onto the apostle Peter, only Peter didn't have quite enought to
'walk' on water, he could only stand on it. We know for a fact that he
raised Lazarus from the dead because *ONE* of our gospels says so. Ummmm,
let's see. He also multiplied the loaves and fishes. That's well documented
in the Josephus' 'Antiquites' vol. 20. Ohhhh. Hang on. Silly me. It's not
found in any other contemporary source other than the gospels. But it's well
documented in scripture, so why don't we just give that one a 'go'. Well
judging from these facts, as well as the fact that Jesus endowed the
apostles with the ability to raise people from the dead too, I'd have to
conclude that with this vast array of facts and unbiased opinion, one would
*have* to conclude that Jesus, indeed, did not perform any miracles.
As for his 'divinity', one can say with certainty that he was 'divine' as he
was 'blue-eyed and blond'.
Greywolf


Miracle is not magic. Divine power is not magical power.

Divine power is the power of truth and love. It is by such power Jesus
preached his message and confronted the Jewish religious authorities.







http://www.jewsforjudaism.org


Bumper Sticker


DIVINE INSANITY
God killed himself on the cross to save his own creation fro-m his own
wrath! (Author unknown)


One God, father-son-ghost?


Holy Trinity "Me, Myself, and I"


Triune god: "Buy one god, get two free"



There is no copyright to this post or its contents anything can be
taken from this post without permission.

.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 25 Jun 2006 01:14:30 PM
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:129reck18cerof0@corp.supernews.com...


"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?




Does the Pope poop in the woods?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate.


Let me see if I got this correct. There was a 1st-century Jew named Jesus
who is *thought* to have been the creator of the universe hiding in only
what *looked* to be a human body to everyone around him, and *really* was
human except for the fact that he could, allegedly, walk on water and
raise people from the dead in a way no other humans could.

Am I 'on track' with this right so far?

(he was still

God, but he acted as if he were man.


Are you implying that 'God' was 'possessed' by a human creature 'thingie'
named 'Jesus', or is it the other way around. I'm confused.

Jesus was as powerless as any

other man.


Whoa! Hold on there, Hombre. I don't think causing a fig tree that had the
temerity *not* to produce figs out of season to 'wither' and die, simply
by wiggling his nose is *not* exactly 'powerless'. If you catch my
'drift'.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?


That's a toughie. Let's see. Did Jesus have the ability to perform
'miracles'? Well let's look at the facts: We know that he turned water
into wine at Cana. We also know that he walked on water -- and even
transferred that ability onto the apostle Peter. We know for a fact that
he raised Lazarus from the dead because *ONE* of our gospels says so.
Ummmm, let's see. He also multiplied the loaves and fishes. That's well
documented in the Josephus' 'Antiquites' vol. 20. Ohhhh. Hang on. Silly
me. It's not found in any other contemporary source other than the
gospels. But it's well documented in scripture, so why don't we just give
that one a 'go'. Well judging from these facts, as well as the fact that
Jesus endowed the apostles with the ability to raise people from the dead
too, I'd have to conclude that with this vast array of facts and unbiased
opinion, one would *have* to conclude that Jesus, indeed, did not perform
any miracles.

As for his 'divinity', one can say with certainty that he was 'divine' as
he was 'blue-eyed and blond'.

Greywolf


Sorry. I had to make some badly needed corrections. Mr. Know-It-All over
here had his head up his ***** on when posting this one.
Greywolf
.

User: "Joe Tucker"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 24 Jun 2006 06:45:37 PM
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:129reck18cerof0@corp.supernews.com...


"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?


That's a toughie. Let's see. Did Jesus have the ability to perform
'miracles'? Well let's look at the facts: We know that he turned water
into wine at Cana. We also know that he walked on water -- and even
transferred that ability onto the apostle Peter, only Peter didn't have
quite enought to 'walk' on water, he could only stand on it. We know for a
fact that he raised Lazarus from the dead because *ONE* of our gospels
says so. Ummmm, let's see. He also multiplied the loaves and fishes.
That's well documented in the Josephus' 'Antiquites' vol. 20. Ohhhh. Hang
on. Silly me. It's not found in any other contemporary source other than
the gospels. But it's well documented in scripture, so why don't we just
give that one a 'go'. Well judging from these facts, as well as the fact
that Jesus endowed the apostles with the ability to raise people from the
dead too, I'd have to conclude that with this vast array of facts and
unbiased opinion, one would *have* to conclude that Jesus, indeed, did not
perform any miracles.

A human does not have to be God to resurrect someone from the dead. Elijah
and Elisha, with God's power, had each resurrected a child.
According to John 11:41-43 Jesus prays out loud so that the people will know
that what he is about to do is accomplished through the power of God.
Jesus wasn't praying to himself. By praying out loud the people would know
that God was with him, Not that he was God.
John 11:41-43
41 Therefore they took the stone away. Now Jesus raised his eyes heavenward
and said: Father, I thank you that you have heard me. 42 True, I knew that
you always hear me; but on account of the crowd standing around I spoke, in
order that they might believe that you sent me forth. 43 And when he had
said these things, he cried out with a loud voice: LazŽa·rus, come on out!
This is just another example that the god-man teaching is false.
.


User: "Mary Walker"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 24 Jun 2006 04:41:54 PM
"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?


Miracle is not magic. Divine power is not magical power.

Divine power is the power of truth and love. It is by such power Jesus
preached his message and confronted the Jewish religious authorities.

The brainwashed christian morons are incapable of knowing the word "truth".
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 27 Jun 2006 05:37:15 AM
Mary Walker wrote:

"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?


Miracle is not magic. Divine power is not magical power.

Divine power is the power of truth and love. It is by such power Jesus
preached his message and confronted the Jewish religious authorities.


The brainwashed christian morons are incapable of knowing the word "truth".

Christian are not brainwashed morons. In the world, more than 50
percents of the schools were founded by Christian, more than 50 percent
of hospital were founded by Christian. Red cross has a Christian
theme. Same as a lot of humanitarian organisation such as tear funds.
During the medieval, Christian monks and priests were the educated
people in Europe while the godless remain uneducated. Christian know
the word 'truth', it is in the Bible.
Jesus had the power even when He was on earth. It was all written in
the Bible. His power is not by the might (or magic like you said).
His power was His love. Love is more powerful than anything. Love
allows Christian to love people who called them 'brainwashed morons',
to love those who hate them, to love those who kill them and their love
one, to forgive people who harm them, this is the power that Jesus has.
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 27 Jun 2006 11:26:00 PM
On 27 Jun 2006 03:37:15 -0700,
wrote:
- Refer: <1151404635.869765.133910@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>


Mary Walker wrote:

"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?


Miracle is not magic. Divine power is not magical power.

Divine power is the power of truth and love. It is by such power Jesus
preached his message and confronted the Jewish religious authorities.


The brainwashed christian morons are incapable of knowing the word "truth".


Christian are not brainwashed morons.

Hah!
Very funny.

In the world, more than 50
percents of the schools were founded by Christian, more than 50 percent
of hospital were founded by Christian. Red cross has a Christian
theme. Same as a lot of humanitarian organisation such as tear funds.
During the medieval, Christian monks and priests were the educated
people in Europe while the godless remain uneducated. Christian know
the word 'truth', it is in the Bible.

Childish appeals to popularity don't cut it, mate.

Jesus had the power even when He was on earth. It was all written in
the Bible. His power is not by the might (or magic like you said).
His power was His love. Love is more powerful than anything. Love
allows Christian to love people who called them 'brainwashed morons',
to love those who hate them, to love those who kill them and their love
one, to forgive people who harm them, this is the power that Jesus has.

Delusional *****.
You have conclusively proven what you set out to negate.
If Christians ar anything at all like you, then they are brainwashed
morons of the first order.
Now do something useful: run along and ask your priest to stop
molesting kiddies.
--
.


User: "bass"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 24 Jun 2006 06:04:47 PM
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:41:54 +0100, "Mary Walker" <mary@walker.com>
wrote:


"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?


Miracle is not magic. Divine power is not magical power.

Divine power is the power of truth and love. It is by such power Jesus
preached his message and confronted the Jewish religious authorities.


The brainwashed christian morons are incapable of knowing the word "truth".

Mary Walker the Dumbass No. 1 Hypocrite is incapable of telling the
truth - never mind knowing.
.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 24 Jun 2006 06:44:28 PM
"bass" <manny@basslake.org> wrote in message
news:g6hr92pm8334t73skng7nkl21thd02jo3l@4ax.com...

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:41:54 +0100, "Mary Walker" <mary@walker.com>
wrote:


"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?


Miracle is not magic. Divine power is not magical power.

Divine power is the power of truth and love. It is by such power Jesus
preached his message and confronted the Jewish religious authorities.


The brainwashed christian morons are incapable of knowing the word
"truth".



Mary Walker the Dumbass No. 1 Hypocrite is incapable of telling the
truth - never mind knowing.

Read Matthew 27:50-53. Now tell me who *you* think is telling the 'truth':
The Christian who says that the events described by Matthew *actually*
occurred and are historical 'fact', or the atheist who says that Matthew is
reporting a 'lie'? And wouldn't you concur with 'Mary Walker the "Dumb-*****"
No. 1 Hypocrite' that the Christians who believe said passage to be 'true'
are 'brainwashed Christian morons'?
Greywolf
.
User: "Malcolm"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 25 Jun 2006 03:35:13 AM
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote

"bass" <manny@basslake.org> wrote


Mary Walker the Dumbass No. 1 Hypocrite is incapable of telling the
truth - never mind knowing.


Read Matthew 27:50-53. Now tell me who *you* think is telling the 'truth':
The Christian who says that the events described by Matthew *actually*
occurred and are historical 'fact', or the atheist who says that Matthew
is reporting a 'lie'? And wouldn't you concur with 'Mary Walker the
"Dumb-*****" No. 1 Hypocrite' that the Christians who believe said passage
to be 'true' are 'brainwashed Christian morons'?

The fundamentalist say that "it is in the Bible therefore it is necessarily
true".
This is, as you say, the attitude of the brainwashed moron.
The easiest answer is that Matthew believed that Jesus was the messiah, and
that the messiah would raise the dead to life, and so reports people coming
out of their graves.
However by atheist logic, a possibility or probability becomes a certainty,
if it happens to be convenient for them. So Matthew is therefore necessarily
lying. How would you be entirely sure of that? For instance a teacher of
mine, who was a priest, saw another priest in an old-fashioned cassock in
the grounds of the runied Fountains Abbey. Whne he went over to greet him,
this priest had disappeared. A ghost.
So maybe this teacher was lying, maybe it was some trick of the light, or
some psychological quirk. But I am not lying when I report a dead person
appearing.
--
Buy my book 12 Common Atheist Arguments (refuted)
$1.25 download or $7.20 paper, available www.lulu.com/bgy1mm
.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 25 Jun 2006 02:14:43 PM
"Malcolm" <regniztar@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:CMCdneONF7P5VAPZRVny1w@bt.com...




"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote

"bass" <manny@basslake.org> wrote


Mary Walker the Dumbass No. 1 Hypocrite is incapable of telling the
truth - never mind knowing.


Read Matthew 27:50-53. Now tell me who *you* think is telling the
'truth': The Christian who says that the events described by Matthew
*actually* occurred and are historical 'fact', or the atheist who says
that Matthew is reporting a 'lie'? And wouldn't you concur with 'Mary
Walker the "Dumb-*****" No. 1 Hypocrite' that the Christians who believe
said passage to be 'true' are 'brainwashed Christian morons'?

The fundamentalist say that "it is in the Bible therefore it is
necessarily true".
This is, as you say, the attitude of the brainwashed moron.

The easiest answer is that Matthew believed that Jesus was the messiah,
and that the messiah would raise the dead to life, and so reports people
coming out of their graves.

And as a report of an 'historica'l event, I might add.


However by atheist logic, a possibility or probability becomes a
certainty, if it happens to be convenient for them.

No. It becomes a 'certainty' when it can be proven to be true -- and nothing
less.
So Matthew is therefore necessarily

lying. How would you be entirely sure of that?

Well here's a few hints: (1) none of the other three evangelists report it;
and
we're talking about a *truly* monumental 'event' here. We're not talking
about
Roman soldiers gambling for Jesus' robe. (2) No other contemporary historian
reports it -- including the supernatural (alleged) 'tearing in two' of the
Temple
curtain. (3) It is utterly preposterous -- even laughable -- and flies in
the face
of everything we know of the physical universe. Face it, it's a bold-face
lie.
For instance a teacher of

mine, who was a priest, saw another priest in an old-fashioned cassock in
the grounds of the runied Fountains Abbey. Whne he went over to greet him,
this priest had disappeared. A ghost.

And the 'proof' this priest/teacher supplied you with was ... ?

So maybe this teacher was lying, maybe it was some trick of the light, or
some psychological quirk. But I am not lying when I report a dead person
appearing.

In this instance, you are not lying. You are merely recounting a lie --
maybe a
'white' one at that -- that a former priest/teacher told you. Nothing wrong
in
that.



--

Greywolf
.
User: "Malcolm"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 01 Jul 2006 05:30:31 PM
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote

"Malcolm" <regniztar@btinternet.com> wrote in message

[ Matthew's report of people coming out of graves ]

The easiest answer is that Matthew believed that Jesus was the messiah,
and that the messiah would raise the dead to life, and so reports people
coming out of their graves.


And as a report of an 'historica'l event, I might add.


However by atheist logic, a possibility or probability becomes a
certainty, if it happens to be convenient for them.


No. It becomes a 'certainty' when it can be proven to be true -- and
nothing less.

So Matthew is therefore necessarily

lying. How would you be entirely sure of that?


Well here's a few hints: (1) none of the other three evangelists report
it; and we're talking about a *truly* monumental 'event' here. We're not
talking about Roman soldiers gambling for Jesus' robe. (2) No other
contemporary historian
reports it -- including the supernatural (alleged) 'tearing in two' of the
Temple curtain. (3) It is utterly preposterous -- even laughable -- and
flies in the face of everything we know of the physical universe. Face it,
it's a bold-face lie.

Ok. So an alternative is that, after the resurrection, a few ghosts of
decesased people appear to Christian sympathisers around Jerusalem. the
other evangelists don't like the story becuase they don't want to associate
Jesus with a ghost. However the tale grows a bit in the telling, and Matthew
reports it as he does.
We know that people regularly report ghosts. We know that historians don't
often report ghost sightings. We don't know whether a ghost is a physical
alteration in the external world or someting internal to the oberver's
state, and we certainly don't know enough about human psychology to know if
this violates any laws, though we know it is not an everyday occurrence.
So all your objections fall.
Do I personally believe this explanation? No. But it cannot be disproven
beyond any reasonable doubt. A probable opinion doesn't become a certainty,
just because atheists happen to think it is convenient.


--
Buy my book 12 Common Atheist Arguments (refuted)
$1.25 download or $7.20 paper, available www.lulu.com/bgy1mm
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 02 Jul 2006 06:30:47 AM
In <VM-dnRZUW6oKajvZRVnyvA@bt.com>, on 07/01/06
at 11:30 PM, "Malcolm" <regniztar@btinternet.com> said:
followups set to trolls home group, & the atheist one

"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote

"Malcolm" <regniztar@btinternet.com> wrote in message

[ Matthew's report of people coming out of graves ]

The easiest answer is that Matthew believed that Jesus was the messiah,
and that the messiah would raise the dead to life, and so reports people
coming out of their graves.


And as a report of an 'historica'l event, I might add.


However by atheist logic, a possibility or probability becomes a
certainty, if it happens to be convenient for them.


No. It becomes a 'certainty' when it can be proven to be true -- and
nothing less.

So Matthew is therefore necessarily

lying. How would you be entirely sure of that?


Well here's a few hints: (1) none of the other three evangelists report
it; and we're talking about a *truly* monumental 'event' here. We're not
talking about Roman soldiers gambling for Jesus' robe. (2) No other
contemporary historian
reports it -- including the supernatural (alleged) 'tearing in two' of the
Temple curtain. (3) It is utterly preposterous -- even laughable -- and
flies in the face of everything we know of the physical universe. Face it,
it's a bold-face lie.

Ok. So an alternative is that, after the resurrection, a few ghosts of
decesased people appear to Christian sympathisers around Jerusalem. the
other evangelists don't like the story becuase they don't want to
associate Jesus with a ghost. However the tale grows a bit in the
telling, and Matthew reports it as he does.

Are you attempting to provide a red herring, or you attempting to pretend
that there are viable options that can be verified? In either event you
have failed. The fact is, there are no supporting claims by any other of
the authors will be truly unique event of ghosts, as in the bodies of the
dead, Saints if I recall correctly, getting out of their graves and
walking around Jerusalem town talking with people. Apparently, it was
considered a rather ordinary and not worthy of anything but casual
comment. This would be typical of the Greek religion. It is totally out
of line with the Jewish mythology. Just as the virgin birth is.

We know that people regularly report ghosts. We know that historians
don't often report ghost sightings. We don't know whether a ghost is a
physical alteration in the external world or someting internal to the
oberver's state, and we certainly don't know enough about human
psychology to know if this violates any laws, though we know it is not
an everyday occurrence.

& we know that we know nothing about a ghost that can be nailed down, or
we have a go on is people's claims based on their observations or
experiences. Bit like the Holy Ghost would not you say?

So all your objections fall.

Actually, they do not. Historically they are contradictions as well as a
failure. As this does not appease your sensibilities, it is only a
problem for atheists when you make it such, as in now. Of course, with
your overinflated sense of philosophy, assumed knowledge, or whatever it
happens to be, you assume your problems are our problems. They're in
reality, are your problems and not ours.

Do I personally believe this explanation? No. But it cannot be disproven
beyond any reasonable doubt. A probable opinion doesn't become a
certainty, just because atheists happen to think it is convenient.

A probable opinion based on historical evidence comes so close to being a
certainty is to be embarrassing. It is a bit like your presumption that
you know more than you have been able to show. But then, you have been
like it since I first encountered you. Lot of words, a lot of tap
dancing, very little information that can be reacted to.
walksalone who suspects that Malcolm does realize how futile his excursion
into the atheist newsgroup is, yet it is one of the ways that he can
obtain the attention of others, such is the life of a poser.
--
Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own.
You may both be wrong.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.


User: "Reseller"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 27 Jun 2006 03:46:27 AM
The Jews murdered Jesus Christ ! Did you forgot ?
You stupid Muslim-Hating-Nazis are so unbelivable stupid ! Dont know
anything about History , dont know anything about Knowledge in the World ,
just empty Head , Idiots , and Hater-Scum !
Jesus Christ or Abraham would spit on your Face and would say that you are
the devilish Evils !
You are just godless stupid hating Nazis of Today , nothing else . You are
the Shame of Humanity .
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:129to5b9kpvliec@corp.supernews.com...


"Malcolm" <regniztar@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:CMCdneONF7P5VAPZRVny1w@bt.com...




"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote

"bass" <manny@basslake.org> wrote


Mary Walker the Dumbass No. 1 Hypocrite is incapable of telling the
truth - never mind knowing.


Read Matthew 27:50-53. Now tell me who *you* think is telling the
'truth': The Christian who says that the events described by Matthew
*actually* occurred and are historical 'fact', or the atheist who says
that Matthew is reporting a 'lie'? And wouldn't you concur with 'Mary
Walker the "Dumb-*****" No. 1 Hypocrite' that the Christians who believe
said passage to be 'true' are 'brainwashed Christian morons'?

The fundamentalist say that "it is in the Bible therefore it is
necessarily true".
This is, as you say, the attitude of the brainwashed moron.

The easiest answer is that Matthew believed that Jesus was the messiah,
and that the messiah would raise the dead to life, and so reports people
coming out of their graves.


And as a report of an 'historica'l event, I might add.


However by atheist logic, a possibility or probability becomes a
certainty, if it happens to be convenient for them.


No. It becomes a 'certainty' when it can be proven to be true -- and
nothing less.

So Matthew is therefore necessarily

lying. How would you be entirely sure of that?


Well here's a few hints: (1) none of the other three evangelists report
it; and
we're talking about a *truly* monumental 'event' here. We're not talking
about
Roman soldiers gambling for Jesus' robe. (2) No other contemporary
historian
reports it -- including the supernatural (alleged) 'tearing in two' of the
Temple
curtain. (3) It is utterly preposterous -- even laughable -- and flies in
the face
of everything we know of the physical universe. Face it, it's a bold-face
lie.

For instance a teacher of

mine, who was a priest, saw another priest in an old-fashioned cassock in
the grounds of the runied Fountains Abbey. Whne he went over to greet
him, this priest had disappeared. A ghost.


And the 'proof' this priest/teacher supplied you with was ... ?


So maybe this teacher was lying, maybe it was some trick of the light, or
some psychological quirk. But I am not lying when I report a dead person
appearing.


In this instance, you are not lying. You are merely recounting a lie --
maybe a
'white' one at that -- that a former priest/teacher told you. Nothing
wrong in
that.



--

Greywolf

.


User: "bob young"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 29 Jun 2006 12:43:03 AM
Malcolm wrote:

"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote

"bass" <manny@basslake.org> wrote


Mary Walker the Dumbass No. 1 Hypocrite is incapable of telling the
truth - never mind knowing.


Read Matthew 27:50-53. Now tell me who *you* think is telling the 'truth':
The Christian who says that the events described by Matthew *actually*
occurred and are historical 'fact', or the atheist who says that Matthew
is reporting a 'lie'? And wouldn't you concur with 'Mary Walker the
"Dumb-*****" No. 1 Hypocrite' that the Christians who believe said passage
to be 'true' are 'brainwashed Christian morons'?

The fundamentalist say that "it is in the Bible therefore it is necessarily
true".
This is, as you say, the attitude of the brainwashed moron.

The easiest answer is that Matthew believed that Jesus was the messiah, and
that the messiah would raise the dead to life, and so reports people coming
out of their graves.

However by atheist logic, a possibility or probability becomes a certainty,
if it happens to be convenient for them. So Matthew is therefore necessarily
lying. How would you be entirely sure of that? For instance a teacher of
mine, who was a priest, saw another priest in an old-fashioned cassock in
the grounds of the runied Fountains Abbey. Whne he went over to greet him,
this priest had disappeared. A ghost.

go away you bloody moronic idiot


So maybe this teacher was lying, maybe it was some trick of the light, or
some psychological quirk. But I am not lying when I report a dead person
appearing.

go away you bloody moronic lying idiot



--
Buy my book 12 Common Atheist Arguments (refuted)
$1.25 download or $7.20 paper, available www.lulu.com/bgy1mm

.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 29 Jun 2006 03:37:22 AM
On 29 Jun 2006 00:43:03 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <44A367DF.B73936D5@netvigator.com>



Malcolm wrote:

"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote

"bass" <manny@basslake.org> wrote


Mary Walker the Dumbass No. 1 Hypocrite is incapable of telling the
truth - never mind knowing.


Read Matthew 27:50-53. Now tell me who *you* think is telling the 'truth':
The Christian who says that the events described by Matthew *actually*
occurred and are historical 'fact', or the atheist who says that Matthew
is reporting a 'lie'? And wouldn't you concur with 'Mary Walker the
"Dumb-*****" No. 1 Hypocrite' that the Christians who believe said passage
to be 'true' are 'brainwashed Christian morons'?

The fundamentalist say that "it is in the Bible therefore it is necessarily
true".
This is, as you say, the attitude of the brainwashed moron.

The easiest answer is that Matthew believed that Jesus was the messiah, and
that the messiah would raise the dead to life, and so reports people coming
out of their graves.

However by atheist logic, a possibility or probability becomes a certainty,
if it happens to be convenient for them. So Matthew is therefore necessarily
lying. How would you be entirely sure of that? For instance a teacher of
mine, who was a priest, saw another priest in an old-fashioned cassock in
the grounds of the runied Fountains Abbey. Whne he went over to greet him,
this priest had disappeared. A ghost.


go away you bloody moronic idiot

I see that you finally have Malcolm pegged in the correct pigeon-hole.
He is both an idiot and a transparent fraud.

So maybe this teacher was lying, maybe it was some trick of the light, or
some psychological quirk. But I am not lying when I report a dead person
appearing.


go away you bloody moronic lying idiot

--
.



User: "Joe Tucker"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 27 Jun 2006 09:21:48 PM

Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:129rjivdiqqu588@corp.supernews.com...

"bass" <manny@basslake.org> wrote in message
news:g6hr92pm8334t73skng7nkl21thd02jo3l@4ax.com...

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:41:54 +0100, "Mary Walker" <mary@walker.com>
wrote:


"Eric Brze" <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in message
news:8f8r9217l7kngeeg2jthibjbrhodok9veq@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2006 12:31:11 -0700, "Truth Hunter"
<hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote:

Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities?


One of the common tenets of Christian thought is Jesus surrendered or
stopped using his Divine Power when he became incarnate. (he was still
God, but he acted as if he were man. Jesus was as powerless as any
other man.

My question is: Did Jesus have the ability to perform miracles or was
his divinity on hold while he was on Earth?


Miracle is not magic. Divine power is not magical power.

Divine power is the power of truth and love. It is by such power Jesus
preached his message and confronted the Jewish religious authorities.


The brainwashed christian morons are incapable of knowing the word
"truth".



Mary Walker the Dumbass No. 1 Hypocrite is incapable of telling the
truth - never mind knowing.


Read Matthew 27:50-53. Now tell me who *you* think is telling the 'truth':
The Christian who says that the events described by Matthew *actually*
occurred and are historical 'fact', or the atheist who says that Matthew
is reporting a 'lie'? And wouldn't you concur with 'Mary Walker the
"Dumb-*****" No. 1 Hypocrite' that the Christians who believe said passage
to be 'true' are 'brainwashed Christian morons'?


A modern German translation reads : Tombs were laid open, and many bodies
of those buried were tossed upright. In this posture they projected from the
graves and were seen by many who passed by the place on their way back to
the city.
An incident quite similar to this took place in Ecuador in 1949. There the
dead are usually buried in large burial vaults, shelf upon shelf and vault
upon vault. An earthquake cracked open these vaults, ejecting many dead
bodies, which had to be buried at once to prevent a plague from breaking
out.
If this was a resurrection, how is it that such an unusual event is not
mentioned elsewhere in the Christian Greek Scriptures? Why did not the
apostle Paul call attention to their resurrection in his argument, at First
Corinthians 15, that there is a resurrection of the dead? If many had been
resurrected and seen by many, such would have been common knowledge and Paul
would have mentioned the fact.
.
User: "wbarwell"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 28 Jun 2006 08:31:33 AM
Joe Tucker wrote:

A modern German translation reads : Tombs were laid open, and many bodies
of those buried were tossed upright. In this posture they projected from
the graves and were seen by many who passed by the place on their way back
to the city.

An incident quite similar to this took place in Ecuador in 1949. There the
dead are usually buried in large burial vaults, shelf upon shelf and vault
upon vault. An earthquake cracked open these vaults, ejecting many dead
bodies, which had to be buried at once to prevent a plague from breaking
out.

If this was a resurrection, how is it that such an unusual event is not
mentioned elsewhere in the Christian Greek Scriptures? Why did not the
apostle Paul call attention to their resurrection in his argument, at
First Corinthians 15, that there is a resurrection of the dead? If many
had been resurrected and seen by many, such would have been common
knowledge and Paul would have mentioned the fact.

50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the
bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept
arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy
city, and appeared unto many.
--
Join the anti-willful-religious-stupidity brigade today.
You will be glad you did.
Our motto: Slap! "Wake up stupid!"

Cheerful Charlie
.
User: "Joe Tucker"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 28 Jun 2006 09:02:01 PM
"wbarwell" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12a512bnp4j3j63@corp.supernews.com...

Joe Tucker wrote:

A modern German translation reads : Tombs were laid open, and many
bodies
of those buried were tossed upright. In this posture they projected from
the graves and were seen by many who passed by the place on their way
back
to the city.

An incident quite similar to this took place in Ecuador in 1949. There
the
dead are usually buried in large burial vaults, shelf upon shelf and
vault
upon vault. An earthquake cracked open these vaults, ejecting many dead
bodies, which had to be buried at once to prevent a plague from breaking
out.

If this was a resurrection, how is it that such an unusual event is not
mentioned elsewhere in the Christian Greek Scriptures? Why did not the
apostle Paul call attention to their resurrection in his argument, at
First Corinthians 15, that there is a resurrection of the dead? If many
had been resurrected and seen by many, such would have been common
knowledge and Paul would have mentioned the fact.



50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to
the
bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept
arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the
holy
city, and appeared unto many.


They could not even have been resurrected to life right after Jesus was
because Paul shows that the Christian holy ones will be resurrected and
receive their reward in that day, when the Lord himself will descend from
heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel's voice and with God's
trumpet. Paul did not even write this until many years after Jesus had been
resurrected, and it was to be fulfilled far in the future. 1 Thess. 4:16.
These holy ones, could not have been resurrected with the prospect of
endless life before Jesus was.
1 Cor. 15:20: Christ has been raised up from the dead, the firstfruits of
those who have fallen asleep in death.
Col. 1:18: He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that he might
become the one who is first in all things. These holy ones, therefore, could
not have been resurrected with the prospect of endless life before Jesus
was.
Regarding these verses one of the foremost Protestant Bible commentaries,
that by Adam Clarke, states: "It is difficult to account for the transaction
mentioned in verses 52 and 53. Some have thought that these two verses have
been introduced into the text of Matthew from the gospel of the Nazarenes,
others think the simple meaning is this: by the earthquake several bodies
that had been buried were thrown up and exposed to view, and continued above
ground till after Christ's resurrection, and were seen by many persons in
the city. Why the graves should be opened on Friday, and the bodies not
raised to life till the following Sunday, is difficult to be conceived. The
place is extremely obscure."
To put it simply: Since Jesus was resurrected 3 days after he died and the
bodies was exposed to view at his death, then the bodies would have to lay
for 3 days before a resuurrection was possible.
The pronoun they (Matt. 27:53, RS) could not refer to the bodies, because
all pronouns in the Greek have gender and they is in the masculine, whereas
bodies is in the neuter gender. Nor could they refer to the holy ones, for
the text does not say that the holy ones were raised but merely that their
bodies were raised or thrown up. Further, even the most ancient manuscripts
are not in agreement with one another as to the reading of this text. The
Sinaitic omits the words and the memorial tombs were opened and entered.
In view of all the questions that these texts raise, their contradictory
reading and the variations in them found in the most ancient manuscripts,
another alternative may not be ruled out, that these verses were not written
by Matthew himself but added by an early copying hand. This position seems
to find further support in the fact that the particular Greek word for
resurrection (RS) used here, égersis, occurs nowhere else in the Christian
Greek Scriptures. Also, here is the only use of the expression the saints,
holy ones, in all the Gospels, it first appearing after Pentecost. The fact
that these verses are found in the apocryphal Gospel of the Nazarenes but
not in any of the other canonical Gospels further makes these verses
suspect. Incidentally, this Gospel by the Nazarenes was held by some to have
been Matthew's original Gospel in Hebrew, which he later translated into
Greek. It resembles his canonical Gospel quite closely except that it begins
without the genealogy.
We cannot escape it, verses 52 and 53 of Matthew, chapter 27, are ambiguous.
In fact, they are among the most difficult verses to translate of the entire
Christian Greek Scriptures. Because of their ambiguity no one can
dogmatically state just how they should be rendered. What governs the
translation of texts such as these where there is an ambiguity in the
original text therefore is not textual criticism, because it is frustrated
by the ambiguity. Rather, exegesis, or Bible interpretation of the meaning
intended by the original writer, will have to govern. The way each
translator would therefore render such texts would depend upon his
understanding of the rest of the Scriptures. The Scriptural facts above set
out dictate how they must be rendered to be consistent with the rest of the
Bible.
.
User: "wbarwell"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 29 Jun 2006 08:47:53 AM
Joe Tucker wrote:



50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the
ghost. 51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the
top to the
bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept
arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the
holy
city, and appeared unto many.



They could not even have been resurrected to life right after Jesus was
because Paul shows that the Christian holy ones will be resurrected and
receive their reward in that day, when the Lord himself will descend from
heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel's voice and with God's
trumpet. Paul did not even write this until many years after Jesus had
been resurrected, and it was to be fulfilled far in the future. 1 Thess.
4:16.


That is what the gospels say.
Paul was obviously wrong here, wasn't he?
And Jesus tell us that the end of the world and judgmemnt day
was to be some 1930 years ago, in the lifetimes of "some standing
here", in "this generation" in the lifetime of the high priest at Jerusalem.
Now, this 'prophecy' failed, none of it happened in the time and place as
Jesus 'prophecied' so its al lrtaher moot now.
the times for these claimed things is long gone. Jesus was was
wrong, the writers of these anonymous gospels were wrong.
Paul again and again repeatedly tells us Jesus is returning SOON, and
that was wrong too.
Now, catch a clue.
Its all dead and gone. Jesus ain't coming back.
How long are fools going to cling to childish fables?
*************************************************
The outrageous failed prophecy of Jesus
that he'd preside over the end of the world
and judgment day itself 1930 years ago.
William C. Barwell 3-16-05
*************************************************
Deuteronomy 18:21-2
21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we
know the word which the LORD hath not spoken?
22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the
LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass,
that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken,
but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously:
thou shalt not be afraid of him.
----------------------------------------------
Jesus prophecied he'd preside over the end of
the world (Matthew 24:3) and judgment day itself,
(Matthew 16:27-8), he claims he will "come in his
kingdom"and "reward all men according to their
acts".
This is expanded on in Matthew 25:31-45.
He will come in the glory of his angels,
he will be "the King". He will ascend to his
"throne of glory" and gather the nations.
He will sort the "sheep" from the "goats" the
good from the evil. Good will be rewarded with
eternal life in heaven, evil will depart into
"everlasting fire prepared for the devil and
his apostles" (Matthew 25:41)
This is what he means by come in his kingdom.
He will literally be "the King" of the world,
And will preside over judgment day itself.
(Matthew 25:31-34), (John 5:23, 5:27).
When? Matthew 16:27-8 has Jesus assuring his
listeners that "some standing here" will live
to see this all happen. See also Mark 9:1.
Matthew 24-5 is one long pericope. A narrative.
Here we are assured that this will happen in
"this generation", Matthew 24:36, see also Luke
21:32, and Mark 13:30.
This generation will see the sun and moon fail,
the stars fall from heaven. Then Jesus will
descend with his fathers angels and "clouds
of heaven". "This generation" is to see this.
Again, Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21.
He tells the high priest at Jerusalem that he
too will see Jesus descend with "clouds of heaven"
the same phrase he tells us "this generation"
is to see in Matthew 24:36. See also Mark 14:62.
This phrase "clouds of heaven" of Matthew 26:64
and Mark 14:62 thus pins down the happenings of
Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 to be seen in
the times of "this generation" as being seen by
then living high priest, and "Some standing here".

Not some generation 1930 years later.
The "high priest", "this generation", "Some
standing here" did not see these things happen
as prophecied.
No religion has ever failed as spectacularly in
its'prophecies' as has Christianity.
This also puts an end to Revelations, all of that
too was to have taken place some 1930 years ago.
Christianity thus is incredibly irrelevant to
anything, having utterly failed in the main claim
of Jesus, when none of this happened as
prophecied,
by Jesus, alledged god himself according to many
trinitarian Christians.
If Jesus, supposed son of god was so wrong on
this, his main claim, he isn't going to be right
on anything else. This is the most obvious failed
'prophet' and the most failed religion of all
time.
And its finally time to admit these facts.
(End)
The verses quoted.
Matthew 16:27-8
27 "For the Son of man shall come in the glory of
his Father with his angels; and then he shall
reward every man according to his works.
28 "Verily I say unto you, There be some standing
here, which shall not taste of death, till they
see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
Mark 9
1 And he said unto them, "Verily I say unto you,
That there be some of them that stand here, which
shall not taste of death, till they have seen the
kingdom of God come with power.
Matthew 25:30
31 "When the Son of man shall come in his glory,
and all the holy angels with him, then shall he
sit upon the throne of his glory:
32 "And before him shall be gathered all nations:
and he shall separate them one from another, as a
shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:
33 "And he shall set the sheep on his right hand,
but the goats on the left.
34 "Then shall the King say unto them on his right
hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the
kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of
the world:
41 "Then shall he say also unto them on the left
hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting
fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
29 "Immediately after the tribulation of those
days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall
not give her light, and the stars shall fall from
heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be
shaken:
30 "And then shall appear the sign of the Son of
man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of
the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man
coming in the clouds of heaven with power and
great glory.
31 "And he shall send his angels with a great
sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together
his elect from the four winds, from one end of
heaven to the other.
32 "Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his
branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye
know that summer is nigh:
33 "So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these
things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
34 "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall
not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
35 "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words
shall not pass away.
Matthew 26
64 Jesus saith unto him, "Thou hast said:
nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye
see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of
power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
Mark 14
62 And Jesus said, "I am: and ye shall see the Son
of man sitting on the right hand of power, and
coming in the clouds of heaven.
Mark 13
24 "But in those days, after that tribulation, the
sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give
her light,
25 "And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the
powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.
26 "And then shall they see the Son of man coming
in the clouds with great power and glory.
27 "And then shall he send his angels, and shall
gather together his elect from the four winds,
from the uttermost part of the earth to the
uttermost part of heaven.
28 "Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her
branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye
know that summer is near:
29 "So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these
things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at
the doors.
30 "Verily I say unto you, that this generation
shall not pass, till all these things be done.
31 "Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words
shall not pass away.
Luke 21
25 "And there shall be signs in the sun, and in
the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth
distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and
the waves roaring;
26 "Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for
looking after those things which are coming on the
earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
27 "And then shall they see the Son of man coming
in a cloud with power and great glory.
28 "And when these things begin to come to pass,
then look up, and lift up your heads; for your
redemption draweth nigh.
29 And he spake to them a parable; "Behold the fig
tree, and all the trees;
30 "When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of
your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand.
31 "So likewise ye, when ye see these things come
to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh
at hand.
32 "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall
not pass away, till all be fulfilled.
33 "Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words
shall not pass away.
Deteronomy 18
18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among
their brethren, like unto thee, and will put
my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto
them all that I shall command him.
19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will
not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in
my name, I will require it of him.
20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a
word in my name, which I have not commanded him to
speak, or that shall speak in the name of other
gods, even that prophet shall die.
21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we
know the word which the LORD hath not spoken?
22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the
LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass,
that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken,
but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously:
thou shalt not be afraid of him.
--
Join the anti-willful-religious-stupidity brigade today.
You will be glad you did.
Our motto: Slap! "Wake up stupid!"

Cheerful Charlie
.
User: "Joe Tucker"

Title: Re: Did Jesus Have Divine Abilities? 01 Jul 2006 11:39:10 AM
"wbarwell" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12a7md5lgurtvf5@corp.supernews.com...

Joe Tucker wrote:



50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the
ghost. 51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the
top to the
bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept
arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the
holy
city, and appeared unto many.



They could not even have been resurrected to life right after Jesus was
because Paul shows that the Christian holy ones will be resurrected and
receive their reward in that day, when the Lord himself will descend from
heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel's voice and with God's
trumpet. Paul did not even write this until many years after Jesus had
been resurrected, and it was to be fulfilled far in the future. 1 Thess.
4:16.


That is what the gospels say.
Paul was obviously wrong here, wasn't he?

And Jesus tell us that the end of the world and judgmemnt day
was to be some 1930 years ago, in the lifetimes of "some standing
here", in "this generation" in the lifetime of the high priest at
Jerusalem.

Now, this 'prophecy' failed, none of it happened in the time and place as
Jesus 'prophecied' so its al lrtaher moot now.
the times for these claimed things is long gone. Jesus was was
wrong, the writers of these anonymous gospels were wrong.

Paul again and again repeatedly tells us Jesus is returning SOON, and
that was wrong too.

Now, catch a clue.

Its all dead and gone. Jesus ain't coming back.
How long are fools going to cling to childish fables?


*************************************************
The outrageous failed prophecy of Jesus
that he'd preside over the end of the world
and judgment day itself 1930 years ago.
William C. Barwell 3-16-05
*************************************************

Deuteronomy 18:21-2
21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we
know the word which the LORD hath not spoken?
22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the
LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass,
that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken,
but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously:
thou shalt not be afraid of him.

----------------------------------------------

Jesus prophecied he'd preside over the end of
the world (Matthew 24:3) and judgment day itself,
(Matthew 16:27-8), he claims he will "come in his
kingdom"and "reward all men according to their
acts".

This is expanded on in Matthew 25:31-45.
He will come in the glory of his angels,
he will be "the King". He will ascend to his
"throne of glory" and gather the nations.
He will sort the "sheep" from the "goats" the
good from the evil. Good will be rewarded with
eternal life in heaven, evil will depart into
"everlasting fire prepared for the devil and
his apostles" (Matthew 25:41)
This is what he means by come in his kingdom.
He will literally be "the King" of the world,
And will preside over judgment day itself.
(Matthew 25:31-34), (John 5:23, 5:27).

When? Matthew 16:27-8 has Jesus assuring his
listeners that "some standing here" will live
to see this all happen. See also Mark 9:1.

Matthew 24-5 is one long pericope. A narrative.
Here we are assured that this will happen in
"this generation", Matthew 24:36, see also Luke
21:32, and Mark 13:30.

This generation will see the sun and moon fail,
the stars fall from heaven. Then Jesus will
descend with his fathers angels and "clouds
of heaven". "This generation" is to see this.
Again, Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21.

He tells the high priest at Jerusalem that he
too will see Jesus descend with "clouds of heaven"
the same phrase he tells us "this generation"
is to see in Matthew 24:36. See also Mark 14:62.

This phrase "clouds of heaven" of Matthew 26:64
and Mark 14:62 thus pins down the happenings of
Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 to be seen in
the times of "this generation" as being seen by
then living high priest, and "Some standing here".

Not some generation 1930 years later.

The "high priest", "this generation", "Some
standing here" did not see these things happen
as prophecied.
No religion has ever failed as spectacularly in
its'prophecies' as has Christianity.

This also puts an end to Revelations, all of that
too was to have taken place some 1930 years ago.

Christianity thus is incredibly irrelevant to
anything, having utterly failed in the main claim
of Jesus, when none of this happened as
prophecied,
by Jesus, alledged god himself according to many
trinitarian Christians.

If Jesus, supposed son of god was so wrong on
this, his main claim, he isn't going to be right
on anything else. This is the most obvious failed
'prophet' and the most failed religion of all
time.
And its finally time to admit these facts.

(End)

The verses quoted.

Matthew 16:27-8
27 "For the Son of man shall come in the glory of
his Father with his angels; and then he shall
reward every man according to his works.
28 "Verily I say unto you, There be some standing
here, which shall not taste of death, till they
see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Mark 9
1 And he said unto them, "Verily I say unto you,
That there be some of them that stand here, which
shall not taste of death, till they have seen the
kingdom of God come with power.


Matthew 25:30
31 "When the Son of man shall come in his glory,
and all the holy angels with him, then shall he
sit upon the throne of his glory:
32 "And before him shall be gathered all nations:
and he shall separate them one from another, as a
shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:
33 "And he shall set the sheep on his right hand,
but the goats on the left.
34 "Then shall the King say unto them on his right
hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the
kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of
the world:

41 "Then shall he say also unto them on the left
hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting
fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

29 "Immediately after the tribulation of those
days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall
not give her light, and the stars shall fall from
heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be
shaken:
30 "And then shall appear the sign of the Son of
man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of
the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man
coming in the clouds of heaven with power and
great glory.
31 "And he shall send his angels with a great
sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together
his elect from the four winds, from one end of
heaven to the other.
32 "Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his
branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye
know that summer is nigh:
33 "So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these
things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
34 "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall
not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
35 "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words
shall not pass away.

Matthew 26
64 Jesus saith unto him, "Thou hast said:
nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye
see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of
power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

Mark 14
62 And Jesus said, "I am: and ye shall see the Son
of man sitting on the right hand of power, and
coming in the clouds of heaven.

Mark 13
24 "But in those days, after that tribulation, the
sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give
her light,
25 "And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the
powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.
26 "And then shall they see the Son of man coming
in the clouds with great power and glory.
27 "And then shall he send his angels, and shall
gather together his elect from the four winds,
from the uttermost part of the earth to the
uttermost part of heaven.
28 "Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her
branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye
know that summer is near:
29 "So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these
things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at
the doors.
30 "Verily I say unto you, that this generation
shall not pass, till all these things be done.
31 "Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words
shall not pass away.


Luke 21
25 "And there shall be signs in the sun, and in
the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth
distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and
the waves roaring;
26 "Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for
looking after those things which are coming on the
earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
27 "And then shall they see the Son of man coming
in a cloud with power and great glory.
28 "And when these things begin to come to pass,
then look up, and lift up your heads; for your
redemption draweth nigh.
29 And he spake to them a parable; "Behold the fig
tree, and all the trees;
30 "When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of
your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand.
31 "So likewise ye, when ye see these things come
to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh
at hand.
32 "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall
not pass away, till all be fulfilled.
33 "Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words
shall not pass away.

Deteronomy 18
18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among
their brethren, like unto thee, and will put
my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto
them all that I shall command him.
19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will
not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in
my name, I will require it of him.
20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a
word in my name, which I have not commanded him to
speak, or that shall speak in the name of other
gods, even that prophet shall die.
21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we
know the word which the LORD hath not spoken?
22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the
LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass,
that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken,
but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously:
thou shalt not be afraid of him.

--

Join the anti-willful-religious-stupidity brigade today.
You will be glad you did.

Our motto: Slap! "Wake up stupid!"


Cheerful Charlie

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you know that you are fulfilling bible prophecy right now!
A bad condition of heart coupled with wrong expectations regarding Christ's
presence contributes to the attitude of ridiculers. It was foretold that, in
the last days, they would scoff, saying: Where is this promised presence of
his? Why, from the day our forefathers fell asleep in death, all things are
continuing exactly as from creation's beginning. 2Pe 3:2-4; compare 1:16.
Wrong expectations regarding Christ's presence can be attributed to how
Matthew 24:3 is translated. It should read: While he was sitting upon the
Mount of Olives, the disciples approached him privately, saying: Tell us,
When will these things be, and what will be the sign of your PRESENCE (NOT
COMMING) and of the conclusion of the system of things?
This prompts the question: Why would a sign be needed to know when he is
present?
The following references will explain:
PRESENCE
The Greek word from which presence is translated is pa·rou·siŽa, formed from
pa·raŽ (alongside) and ou·siŽa (being; derived from ei·miŽ, meaning be).
Hence, pa·rou·siŽa means, literally, being alongside, that is, a presence.
It is used 24 times in the Christian Greek Scriptures, frequently with
regard to the presence of Christ in connection with his Messianic Kingdom.
Mt 24:3
Many translations vary their renderings of this word. While translating
pa·rou·siŽa as presence in some texts, they more frequently render it as
coming. This has been the basis for the expression second coming or second
advent (adventus [advent or coming] being the Latin Vulgate translation of
pa·rou·siŽa at Mt 24:3) with regard to Christ Jesus. While Jesus' presence
of necessity implies his arrival at the place where he is present, the
translation of pa·rou·siŽa by coming places all the emphasis on the arrival
and obscures the subsequent presence that follows the arrival. Though
allowing for both arrival and presence as translations of pa·rou·siŽa,
lexicographers generally acknowledge that the presence of the person is the
principal idea conveyed by the word.
Vine's Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words (1981, Vol. 1,
pp. 208, 209) states: PAROUSIA . . . denotes both an arrival and a
consequent presence with. For instance, in a papyrus letter [written in
Greek] a lady speaks of the necessity of her parousia in a place in order to
attend to matters relating to her property there. . . . When used of the
return of Christ, at the Rapture of the Church, it signifies, not merely His
momentary coming for His saints, but His presence with them from that moment
until His revelation and manifestation to the world. Liddell and Scott's
Greek-English Lexicon (revised by H. Jones, Oxford, 1968, p. 1343) shows
that pa·rou·siŽa is used at times in secular Greek literature to refer to
the visit of a royal or official personage.
Secular Greek writings are, of course, helpful in determining the sense of
this Greek term. However, even more effective is the use given the word in
the Bible itself. At Philippians 2:12, for example, Paul speaks of the
Philippian Christians as obeying not during my presence [pa·rou·siŽai] only,
but now much more readily during my absence [a·pou·siŽai]. So, too, at 2
Corinthians 10:10, 11, after referring to those who said that his letters
are weighty and forceful, but his presence [pa·rou·siŽa] in person is weak
and his speech contemptible, Paul adds, Let such a man take this into
account, that what we are in our word by letters when absent [a·ponŽtes],
such we shall also be in action when present [pa·ronŽtes]. (Compare also Php
1:24-27.) Thus, the contrast is between presence and absence, not between an
arrival (or coming) and departure.
In view of this, J. B. Rotherham's Emphasised Bible states in its appendix
(p. 271): In this edition the word parousia is uniformly rendered 'presence'
('coming,' as a representative of this word, being set aside). . . . The
sense of 'presence' is so plainly [shown] by the contrast with 'absence' . .
.. that the question naturally arises, Why not always so render it?
That Jesus' pa·rou·siŽa is not simply a momentary coming followed by a rapid
departure but is, rather, a presence covering a period of time is also
indicated by his words recorded at Matthew 24:37-39 and Luke 17:26-30. Here
the days of Noah are compared to the presence of the Son of man (the days of
the Son of man, in Luke's account). Jesus, therefore, does not limit the
comparison just to the coming of the Deluge as a final climax during Noah's
days, though he shows that his own presence or days will see a similar
climax. Since the days of Noah actually covered a period of years, there is
basis for believing that the foretold presence [or days] of the Son of man
would likewise cover a period of some years, being climaxed by the
destruction of those not giving heed to the opportunity afforded them to
seek deliverance.
Nature of Christ's Parousia. A pa·rou·siŽa, or presence, can, of course, be
visible, and in six occurrences of the word the reference is to the visible,
human presence of men, such as Stephanas, Fortunatus, Achaicus, Titus, and
Paul. (1Co 16:17; 2Co 7:6, 7; 10:10; Php 1:26; 2:12) That a pa·rou·siŽa can
also be invisible is indicated by Paul's use of the related verb form
(paŽrei·mi) when speaking of being present in spirit though absent in body.
(1Co 5:3) So, too, Jewish historian Josephus, writing in Greek, refers to
God's pa·rou·siŽa at Mount Sinai, his invisible presence being evidenced by
the thunders and lightning. Jewish Antiquities, III, 80 (v, 2).
The Scripturalness of an invisible presence is also borne out by Jehovah God's
saying to Moses regarding the ark of the covenant in the Most Holy of the
tabernacle: And I will present myself to you there and speak with you from
above the cover. (Ex 25:22) God's presence was not in a visible form, since
the Scriptures are clear that no man has seen God at any time neither Moses
nor the high priest who entered the Most Holy. (Joh 1:18; Ex 33:20) When
King Solomon inaugurated the temple at Jerusalem, the cloud of the glory of
Jehovah filled the house. Solomon spoke of Jehovah as 'residing in the
temple.' Nevertheless, Solomon himself stated: But will God truly dwell upon
the earth? Look! The heavens, yes, the heaven of the heavens, themselves
cannot contain you; how much less, then, this house that I have built!
However, God's eyes would be opened continually toward that house and
prayers that were made there would be heard by him at the place of [his]
dwelling, in the heavens. 1Ki 8:10-13, 27-30; compare Ac 7:45-50.
These accounts illustrate God's power to 'be present' on earth in a
spiritual (hence, invisible) way while He yet remains in heaven. His
presence might in some cases be by means of an angelic representative who
acted and spoke for God, even saying, I am the God of your father, as did
the angel in the flaming bush who spoke to Moses. (Ex 3:2-8; compare Ex
23:20; 32:34.) So, too, Jehovah told Moses that he was coming to him at
Mount Sinai and would come down there (Ex 19:9, 11, 18, 20), yet the
apostolic writings show that it was actually by his angels that God was
there present and delivered to Moses his covenant. Ga 3:19; Heb 2:2; see
FACE.
Since Jehovah's resurrected Son Jesus Christ was granted 'all authority in
heaven and on the earth,' and is the exact representation of [God's] very
being, it follows that he should also be able to be invisibly present in a
similar manner. (Mt 28:18; Heb 1:2, 3) In this regard we may note that, even
when on earth, Jesus Christ was able to effect healings of persons from a
distance, just as though he were there personally present. Mt 8:5-13; Joh
4:46-53.
It is also clear that Jehovah God has placed angels subject to his glorified
Son's command. (1Pe 3:22) Texts relating to Jesus' presence regularly
describe him as 'accompanied' by angelic hosts or as 'sending them forth.'
(Mt 13:37-41, 47-49; 16:27; 24:31; Mr 8:38; 2Th 1:7) This does not mean,
however, that his foretold presence in Kingdom power and glory consists
solely of using angelic messengers or deputies on earthly missions, for this
was being done already back in the first century C.E. in connection with the
apostles and others. (Ac 5:19; 8:26; 10:3, 7, 22; 12:7-11, 23; 27:23) Jesus'
parables and other texts show that his presence is like that of a master
returning to his household and that of a man receiving kingship who returns
to take control of his domain, and that Jesus' presence means a personal
inspection and judgment followed by the active expression or execution o