| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Lin Liangtai" |
| Date: |
02 Feb 2008 08:41:40 AM |
| Object: |
Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=15&f=1371325619&p=0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/DINO%20RIBS%20CUT%20BY%20MAN%2C%2077%20MILLION%20YEARS%20AGO?gda=56Mx_2AAAABHhcPlgMpWla5Xa-DDn6iC_ihFOqox2wGIFmFJYF-Kyhcwy3dI2CgZTioxnYaX_EAi_wJiPmhLqbWxAh2R_w7EFvxJKUOQlCayh-SxYapA4A2nMGv9eiw1afnBCJXvIHQ
Rib cutting directions:
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RIB-CUTTING%20DIRECTIONS?gda=6oolZ0oAAABHhcPlgMpWla5Xa-DDn6iC_ihFOqox2wGIFmFJYF-Kyhcwy3dI2CgZTioxnYaX_ECChskmkbEl2HvrZAiYlTrCqj4y_rGOfLTTREbpiQwekg
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
03 Feb 2008 07:11:43 AM |
|
|
Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named
Leonardo. Half-length of its left ribs are gone, obviously
cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Yes. Definitely. I saw a documentary once, called "The
Flintstones," where this early man named "Fred" had
the ribs delivered to his car, and they were so large that
they caused the car to tip over.
It's hard to believe that we're still arguing this point, all
these years after the evidence was presented on film...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 10:19:52 AM |
|
|
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:0bb30998-2fba-4138-a769-449a61bfd316@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Did they find any traces of a 'dry' or 'wet' rub nearby, perchance? How
about traces of coleslaw?
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lee me@localhost" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 08:50:14 AM |
|
|
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:0bb30998-2fba-4138-a769-449a61bfd316@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Absolutely, and it is obvious from the disruption at the cut ends of the
bone that they used a circular power saw to achieve such a neat linear cut.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 01:56:37 PM |
|
|
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:0bb30998-2fba-4138-a769-449a61bfd316@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
No, they could have been broken off and worn
down over time. Creationists are soooo desperate.
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=15&f=1371325619&p=0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/DINO%20RIBS%20CUT%20BY%20MAN%2C%2077%20MILLION%20YEARS%20AGO?gda=56Mx_2AAAABHhcPlgMpWla5Xa-DDn6iC_ihFOqox2wGIFmFJYF-Kyhcwy3dI2CgZTioxnYaX_EAi_wJiPmhLqbWxAh2R_w7EFvxJKUOQlCayh-SxYapA4A2nMGv9eiw1afnBCJXvIHQ
Rib cutting directions:
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RIB-CUTTING%20DIRECTIONS?gda=6oolZ0oAAABHhcPlgMpWla5Xa-DDn6iC_ihFOqox2wGIFmFJYF-Kyhcwy3dI2CgZTioxnYaX_ECChskmkbEl2HvrZAiYlTrCqj4y_rGOfLTTREbpiQwekg
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
04 Feb 2008 01:52:28 AM |
|
|
In article
<0bb30998-2fba-4138-a769-449a61bfd316@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Lin Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
1) There were no humans during the Cretaceous.
2) Many other explanations could account for the missing ribs.
--
John #1782
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 03:44:33 PM |
|
|
Lin Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in
news:0bb30998-2fba-4138-a769-449a61bfd316@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=15&f=1371325619&p=0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/DINO%20RIBS%
20
CUT%20BY%20MAN%2C%2077%20MILLION%20YEARS%20AGO?gda=56Mx_
2AAAABHhcPlgMpW
la5Xa-DDn6iC_ihFOqox2wGIFmFJYF-
Kyhcwy3dI2CgZTioxnYaX_EAi_wJiPmhLqbWxAh2
R_w7EFvxJKUOQlCayh-SxYapA4A2nMGv9eiw1afnBCJXvIHQ
Rib cutting directions:
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RIB-CUTTING%
20
DIRECTIONS?gda=6oolZ0oAAABHhcPlgMpWla5Xa-DDn6iC_ihFOqox2wGIFmFJYF-
Kyhcw
y3dI2CgZTioxnYaX_ECChskmkbEl2HvrZAiYlTrCqj4y_rGOfLTTREbpiQwekg
Those aren't cut ribs, that's an external rill that runs along the
backbone. ?;(
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 02:16:22 PM |
|
|
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=15&f=1371325619&p=0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 02:30:32 PM |
|
|
On Feb 2, 3:16=A0pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length =A0so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=3Dlin440315&b=3D15&f=3D1371325619&p=
=3D0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
03 Feb 2008 08:54:21 AM |
|
|
<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:246e7e19-b971-4bd2-976d-7927142411ad@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 2, 3:16 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=15&f=1371325619&p=0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
Cute! :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 03:38:32 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:246e7e19-b971-4bd2-976d-7927142411ad@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 3:16 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo.
Half-length of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered
why the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off
--from the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can
still see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the
scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=15&f=1371325619&p
=0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
ROTFLMAO
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
What does this code mean?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 05:38:57 PM |
|
|
On Feb 2, 4:38=A0pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote innews:246e7e19-b971-4bd2-976d-7927142411ad@h=
11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 3:16=A0pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo.
Half-length of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered
why the ribs on its left side were cut half-length =A0so neatly off
--from the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can
still see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the
scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=3Dlin440315&b=3D15&f=3D137132561=
9&p
=3D0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
ROTFLMAO
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
What does this code mean?
The aa Number is an old joke around here. There was a troll back at
the dawn of the group who swore there were only about three atheists,
and a drawer full of sock puppets. We started assigning numbers to
individuals as a reaction to that. It's entirely voluntary. If you'd
like one, ping Michelle Malkin (no, not *that* one...we have our own
<g>).
The other one is BAAWA! (Bad Assed Atheists With Attitude), a self-
declared title meaning no retreat on theistic issues (or at least to
the theist trolls in the group). I have been appointed to the Knights
of BAAWA!, a title given to participants who post a noteworthy defense
of atheism/atheists (or an attack upon theism) to the group. Our
current Warlord is Steve Knight (I bow humbly at my Warlord's feet),
and should he deem your reply to one of these mental midgets worthy,
he shall tap your shoulders with Excalibur and appoint you to the
table. <g>
Again, completely voluntary. Just put BAAWA! somewhere in your sig,
because that's the term the Warlord uses to search for posts.
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoB!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 08:56:17 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:520275e4-6bff-4438-9579-13eb4d8dc4b1@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 4:38 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote
innews:246e7e19-b971-4bd2-976d-7927142411ad@h
11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 3:16 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo.
Half-length of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including
a paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one
wondered why the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so
neatly off --from the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can
still see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below
the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=15&f=137132561
9&p
=0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
ROTFLMAO
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
What does this code mean?
The aa Number is an old joke around here. There was a troll back at
the dawn of the group who swore there were only about three atheists,
and a drawer full of sock puppets. We started assigning numbers to
individuals as a reaction to that. It's entirely voluntary. If you'd
like one, ping Michelle Malkin (no, not *that* one...we have our own
<g>).
The other one is BAAWA! (Bad Assed Atheists With Attitude),
Isn't that a bit redundant? :)
a self-
declared title meaning no retreat on theistic issues (or at least to
the theist trolls in the group).
I'm ambivalent on this matter. Part of me figures that, if I want to
convert them, or at least bring them closer to our viewpoint, I have to
throw them a few bones. Another part of me has a very specific and
precise set of arguments, all of which effectively eliminate all theism.
I have been appointed to the Knights
of BAAWA!, a title given to participants who post a noteworthy defense
of atheism/atheists (or an attack upon theism) to the group.
Have you been reading my attacks lately? I pride myself on my debate
skills, but of course, in an arena so old and so overpopulated, I would
expect that all the good arguments have been made many times over.
Our
current Warlord is Steve Knight (I bow humbly at my Warlord's feet),
and should he deem your reply to one of these mental midgets worthy,
he shall tap your shoulders with Excalibur and appoint you to the
table. <g>
I've gotten two compliments already, and I guess that I'll have to go
and see who they're from.
Again, completely voluntary. Just put BAAWA! somewhere in your sig,
because that's the term the Warlord uses to search for posts.
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoB!
Does "Atl" atsnd for "Atheists league"?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 10:01:21 PM |
|
|
On Feb 3, 10:56=A0am, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote innews:520275e4-6bff-4438-9579-13eb4d8dc4b1@e=
10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 4:38=A0pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote
innews:246e7e19-b971-4bd2-976d-7927142411ad@h
11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 3:16=A0pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo.
Half-length of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including
a paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one
wondered why the ribs on its left side were cut half-length =A0so
neatly off --from the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can
still see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below
the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=3Dlin440315&b=3D15&f=3D137132=
561
9&p
=3D0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
ROTFLMAO
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
What does this code mean?
The aa Number is an old joke around here. There was a troll back at
the dawn of the group who swore there were only about three atheists,
and a drawer full of sock puppets. We started assigning numbers to
individuals as a reaction to that. It's entirely voluntary. If you'd
like one, ping Michelle Malkin (no, not *that* one...we have our own
<g>).
The other one is BAAWA! (Bad Assed Atheists With Attitude),
Isn't that a bit redundant? =A0:)
a self-
declared title meaning no retreat on theistic issues (or at least to
the theist trolls in the group).
I'm ambivalent on this matter. =A0Part of me figures that, if I want to
convert them, or at least bring them closer to our viewpoint, I have to
throw them a few bones. =A0Another part of me has a very specific and
precise set of arguments, all of which effectively eliminate all theism.
I have been appointed to the Knights
of BAAWA!, a title given to participants who post a noteworthy defense
of atheism/atheists (or an attack upon theism) to the group. =A0
Have you been reading my attacks lately? =A0I pride myself on my debate
skills, but of course, in an arena so old and so overpopulated, I would
expect that all the good arguments have been made many times over.
Our
current Warlord is Steve Knight (I bow humbly at my Warlord's feet),
and should he deem your reply to one of these mental midgets worthy,
he shall tap your shoulders with Excalibur and appoint you to the
table. <g>
I've gotten two compliments already, and I guess that I'll have to go
and see who they're from. =A0
Again, completely voluntary. Just put BAAWA! somewhere in your sig,
because that's the term the Warlord uses to search for posts.
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoB!
Does "Atl" atsnd for "Atheists league"?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The following PDF document contains high-resolution expandable photos
of the area where the dinosaur's rib cage was cut open. You can expand
it 300% to see the clear remains of red blood cells still trapped in
the blood vessels. That photo is placed second to the last photo (an X-
RAY photo).
The PDF document:
Sorry. I was unable to paste the above-mentioned document here, but it
is the first file (file name: Expandable Original PDF photo of Kodak
Co.) in my website: http://groups.google.com.tw/group/mummy-dinosaur-carved=
-by-men
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
03 Feb 2008 07:04:05 AM |
|
|
Lin Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in
news:09fafa24-837b-4461-a590-65e92013c29b@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 3, 10:56 am, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote
innews:520275e4-6bff-4438-9579-13eb4d8dc4b1@e
10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 4:38 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote
innews:246e7e19-b971-4bd2-976d-7927142411ad@h
11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 3:16 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo.
Half-length of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy,
including a paleontology professor of Havard University, but
no one wondered why the ribs on its left side were cut
half-length so neatly off --from the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One
can still see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs
below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=15&f=137132
561
9&p
=0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
ROTFLMAO
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
What does this code mean?
The aa Number is an old joke around here. There was a troll back at
the dawn of the group who swore there were only about three
atheists, and a drawer full of sock puppets. We started assigning
numbers to individuals as a reaction to that. It's entirely
voluntary. If you'd like one, ping Michelle Malkin (no, not *that*
one...we have our own <g>).
The other one is BAAWA! (Bad Assed Atheists With Attitude),
Isn't that a bit redundant? :)
a self-
declared title meaning no retreat on theistic issues (or at least
to the theist trolls in the group).
I'm ambivalent on this matter. Part of me figures that, if I want to
convert them, or at least bring them closer to our viewpoint, I have
to throw them a few bones. Another part of me has a very specific
and precise set of arguments, all of which effectively eliminate all
theism.
I have been appointed to the Knights
of BAAWA!, a title given to participants who post a noteworthy
defense of atheism/atheists (or an attack upon theism) to the
group.
Have you been reading my attacks lately? I pride myself on my debate
skills, but of course, in an arena so old and so overpopulated, I
would expect that all the good arguments have been made many times
over.
Our
current Warlord is Steve Knight (I bow humbly at my Warlord's
feet), and should he deem your reply to one of these mental midgets
worthy, he shall tap your shoulders with Excalibur and appoint you
to the table. <g>
I've gotten two compliments already, and I guess that I'll have to go
and see who they're from.
Again, completely voluntary. Just put BAAWA! somewhere in your sig,
because that's the term the Warlord uses to search for posts.
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoB!
Does "Atl" atsnd for "Atheists league"?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The following PDF document contains high-resolution expandable photos
of the area where the dinosaur's rib cage was cut open. You can expand
it 300% to see the clear remains of red blood cells still trapped in
the blood vessels. That photo is placed second to the last photo (an
X- RAY photo).
The PDF document:
Sorry. I was unable to paste the above-mentioned document here, but it
is the first file (file name: Expandable Original PDF photo of Kodak
Co.) in my website:
http://groups.google.com.tw/group/mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men
Sorry Charlie, only good tasting tuna get to be Starkist. You've honed
the science of jumping to wrong conclusions down to a fine edge, haven't
you? Here's the emoticon for "dim bulb," Pythagoras, ?:( and I'm
pasting it onto you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 10:18:07 PM |
|
|
On Feb 3, 12:01=A0pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
On Feb 3, 10:56=A0am, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote innews:520275e4-6bff-4438-9579-13eb4d8dc4b1=
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 4:38=A0pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote
innews:246e7e19-b971-4bd2-976d-7927142411ad@h
11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 3:16=A0pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo.
Half-length of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including
a paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one
wondered why the ribs on its left side were cut half-length =A0s=
o
neatly off --from the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can
still see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below
the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=3Dlin440315&b=3D15&f=3D1371=
32561
9&p
=3D0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
ROTFLMAO
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
What does this code mean?
The aa Number is an old joke around here. There was a troll back at
the dawn of the group who swore there were only about three atheists,
and a drawer full of sock puppets. We started assigning numbers to
individuals as a reaction to that. It's entirely voluntary. If you'd
like one, ping Michelle Malkin (no, not *that* one...we have our own
<g>).
The other one is BAAWA! (Bad Assed Atheists With Attitude),
Isn't that a bit redundant? =A0:)
a self-
declared title meaning no retreat on theistic issues (or at least to
the theist trolls in the group).
I'm ambivalent on this matter. =A0Part of me figures that, if I want to
convert them, or at least bring them closer to our viewpoint, I have to
throw them a few bones. =A0Another part of me has a very specific and
precise set of arguments, all of which effectively eliminate all theism.=
I have been appointed to the Knights
of BAAWA!, a title given to participants who post a noteworthy defense=
of atheism/atheists (or an attack upon theism) to the group. =A0
Have you been reading my attacks lately? =A0I pride myself on my debate
skills, but of course, in an arena so old and so overpopulated, I would
expect that all the good arguments have been made many times over.
Our
current Warlord is Steve Knight (I bow humbly at my Warlord's feet),
and should he deem your reply to one of these mental midgets worthy,
he shall tap your shoulders with Excalibur and appoint you to the
table. <g>
I've gotten two compliments already, and I guess that I'll have to go
and see who they're from. =A0
Again, completely voluntary. Just put BAAWA! somewhere in your sig,
because that's the term the Warlord uses to search for posts.
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoB!
Does "Atl" atsnd for "Atheists league"?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The following PDF document contains high-resolution expandable photos
of the area where the dinosaur's rib cage was cut open. You can expand
it 300% to see the clear remains of red blood cells still trapped in
the blood vessels. That photo is placed second to the last photo (an X-
RAY photo).
The PDF document:
Sorry. I was unable to paste the above-mentioned document here, but it
is the first file (file name: Expandable Original PDF photo of Kodak
Co.) in my website: =A0http://groups.google.com.tw/group/mummy-dinosaur-ca=
rved-by-men- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Try this link:
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/Expandable%20Origin=
al%20PDF%20photo%20of%20Kodak%20Co..pdf?gda=3DKsLoTWIAAACBUU1MHlwjIwaNdejZD9=
tizdxx92RZntqlNmiiBvFyXhcwy3dI2CgZTioxnYaX_EDMWIFXXaxXKU5xzniSrDQ6hRzfPFF3JE=
dSPg7Fu2fsLfIi4B9HaxNLYWmbC196QSf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
03 Feb 2008 04:06:21 AM |
|
|
On Feb 3, 12:18=A0pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:01=A0pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
On Feb 3, 10:56=A0am, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote innews:520275e4-6bff-4438-9579-13eb4d8dc4=
b1@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 4:38=A0pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote
innews:246e7e19-b971-4bd2-976d-7927142411ad@h
11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Feb 2, 3:16=A0pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo.
Half-length of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, includin=
g
a paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one
wondered why the ribs on its left side were cut half-length =
=A0so
neatly off --from the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can=
still see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs belo=
w
the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Dinosaur "Leonardo" during excavation:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=3Dlin440315&b=3D15&f=3D13=
7132561
9&p
=3D0
Note the ribs on the left are half-way gone:
That Fred Flintstone, what an actor!
http://tinyurl.com/2p9hou
I'm sorry...I just couldn't help it.
ROTFLMAO
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
What does this code mean?
The aa Number is an old joke around here. There was a troll back at
the dawn of the group who swore there were only about three atheists=
,
and a drawer full of sock puppets. We started assigning numbers to
individuals as a reaction to that. It's entirely voluntary. If you'd=
like one, ping Michelle Malkin (no, not *that* one...we have our own=
<g>).
The other one is BAAWA! (Bad Assed Atheists With Attitude),
Isn't that a bit redundant? =A0:)
a self-
declared title meaning no retreat on theistic issues (or at least to=
the theist trolls in the group).
I'm ambivalent on this matter. =A0Part of me figures that, if I want t=
o
convert them, or at least bring them closer to our viewpoint, I have t=
o
throw them a few bones. =A0Another part of me has a very specific and
precise set of arguments, all of which effectively eliminate all theis=
m.
I have been appointed to the Knights
of BAAWA!, a title given to participants who post a noteworthy defen=
se
of atheism/atheists (or an attack upon theism) to the group. =A0
Have you been reading my attacks lately? =A0I pride myself on my debat=
e
skills, but of course, in an arena so old and so overpopulated, I woul=
d
expect that all the good arguments have been made many times over.
Our
current Warlord is Steve Knight (I bow humbly at my Warlord's feet),=
and should he deem your reply to one of these mental midgets worthy,=
he shall tap your shoulders with Excalibur and appoint you to the
table. <g>
I've gotten two compliments already, and I guess that I'll have to go
and see who they're from. =A0
Again, completely voluntary. Just put BAAWA! somewhere in your sig,
because that's the term the Warlord uses to search for posts.
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoB!
Does "Atl" atsnd for "Atheists league"?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The following PDF document contains high-resolution expandable photos
of the area where the dinosaur's rib cage was cut open. You can expand
it 300% to see the clear remains of red blood cells still trapped in
the blood vessels. That photo is placed second to the last photo (an X-
RAY photo).
The PDF document:
Sorry. I was unable to paste the above-mentioned document here, but it
is the first file (file name: Expandable Original PDF photo of Kodak
Co.) in my website: =A0http://groups.google.com.tw/group/mummy-dinosaur-=
carved-by-men-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Try this link:http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/Exp=
andable%2...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Sorry. These two links are really good:
Now the red blood cell remains are
Labeled here:
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RED%20BLOOD%20CELLS=
%20NOTED%20IN%20DINOSAUR%20LEONARDO.bmp?gda=3DzEwAqGIAAACBUU1MHlwjIwaNdejZD9=
ti5l5rbskUKRxw8qEM64ljGBcwy3dI2CgZTioxnYaX_EDk0XnS5DcxR-kifHHnP4l01Jol8TZInA=
vK96QDVn6rtUCpIr6LuVhHAP5scMkBpoGu7vB9Ld5cDwr_aXcyFBxO
and here:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=3Dlin440315&b=3D15&f=3Do1371325617.jpg=
&p=3D0
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 11:12:06 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:41:40 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
There were no humans back then.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
Because there are many other explanations - ones that fit the basic
facts that dinosaurs and man never coexisted.
[Snip stupid links]
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 10:56:55 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:41:40 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
It's always amazing how uneducated loons can spot in a second what
people who have spent years studying a subject in depth somehow all
manage to overlook.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Dino ribs cut by Cretaceous men |
02 Feb 2008 03:47:10 PM |
|
|
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
news:t389q3585i80m3t5ltufoddeua6rp49ic3@4ax.com:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:41:40 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following photos show a dinosaur mummy named Leonardo. Half-length
of its left
ribs are gone, obviously cut by humans in the Cretaceous age.
Numerous people have seen/studied the dinosaur mummy, including a
paleontology professor of Havard University, but no one wondered why
the ribs on its left side were cut half-length so neatly off --from
the
vertebrate column to the scales on the left-side skin. One can still
see the remaining half length of the left-side ribs below the scales.
They could only be cut by men. Why no
one notice that?
It's always amazing how uneducated loons can spot in a second what
people who have spent years studying a subject in depth somehow all
manage to overlook.
Isn't it extraordinary what strange stories that these f'loons will
invent to deny established science? You'd think that all that creative
energy would be better spent boning up on the simple issue of dating
geologic samples by counting the number of annual sedimentary layers
deposited on top of them. They wouldn't know how to interpret honest
scientific data if it rose up and bit them in the eyeballs, which is
precisely what has happened, in this case.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
OT: OPEC Asks Others to Cut Oil Output
OT Do you want an incentive to cut down on coffee drinking?
Please cut James Keegan some slack
So He Had His Head Cut Off
OT: Kerry Pledges Iraq Troop Cut Within 4 Years
OT: Washington and Brussels ordered to cut subsidies
Does John Kerry's self-inflicted paper cut qualify him for a Purple Heart?
LIBERALS HATE AMERICA! Does a self-inflicted paper cut qualify for a Purple Heart?
| OT: For Bush, Confidence Can Cut Two Ways
OT: Bush may need to raise tax to cut trade deficit
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE AMERICA ==> GOP Congress TargetsMORE Program Cuts for Poor & Middle Class; Cut Taxes for Rich - "Peoplewill feel some real pain," said Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., "but I don'tknow how you get a deficit down witho
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE AMERICA ==> GOP Congress Targets MORE Program Cuts for Poor & Middle Class; Cut Taxes for Rich - "People will feel some real pain," said Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., "but I don't know how you get a deficit down wi
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE AMERICA ==> GOP Congress TargetsMORE Program Cuts for Poor & Middle Class; Cut Taxes for Rich - "Peoplewill feel some real pain," said Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., "but I don'tknow how you get a deficit down witho
Re: GOP Congress Targets MORE Program Cuts for Poor & Middle Class; Cut Taxes for Rich - "People will feel some real pain," said Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., "but I don't know how you get a deficit down without people taking some medicine."
God-Lite =?iso-8859-1?Q?Doesn=92t?= Cut It Americans like a stouterbrand.
|
|
|
