| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Mud Hut Mafioso" |
| Date: |
12 Feb 2006 01:29:19 AM |
| Object: |
Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message
If you cannot respect other people's beliefs, you are the savage, or at
least an imp.
"Elemenatal_1" <elemental1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
When a persons "beliefs" are full of *****, as are Islam's, respect is not
deserved.
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message
I can say with lot more evidence that it is you who is full of ***** but
what would that prove? Crude insults are no substitute for a reasoned
argument which it seems you are not capable of.
There is no such thing as a reasoned argument with a Muslim. The primitive
myopic reaction of the unevolved Muslim mind prohibits it, and much as it
prohibits introspection, shame, atonement, or humble adaptation. The time
for any effort towards such has long gone. Your Jihad, Holy War, terrorism,
violent protests, and outright contempt for all other religions has seen to
that. Islam is full of *****. It is based on the mother of all lies, and the
overcompensation that Muslims desperately engage in to delude themselves of
this fact yields misery for all Humanity. Every day Muslims are causing
problems all over the world, and patience is getting very, very thin. Not
so long ago, you would find Muslims everywhere proselytizing that Islam is a
"religion of peace". You don't hear that coming from them anymore. Through
the increasing inability of Muslims to control their violent nature, and
through non-Muslims becoming more sensitive and inquisitive to things
Islamic, and jaded to the relentless propaganda, perpetrating the exposed
lie became futile for Muslims, so now they're back to the good old "death to
this" and "death to that". As more and more people become shocked out of
their complacency by the savage behavior patterns of Muslims, and decide to
read the Quran and the other heinous rhetoric that boils over from the
dysfunctional Islamic society behind it, the more the real truth of Islam
comes to light. One lie at a time the facade that Muslims prop up is
falling. At some point you are going to have to admit that people know
enough about Islam, as non-Muslims with no intention of converting, to see
Islam for what it is; a religion of death, coercion, contempt, imperialism,
and supremacism like no other religion known to modern man.
Should we all respect the "beliefs" of Fascists? Neo Nazis?
Islam is a world religion, professed by people of all races, nations and
cultures. For you to compare Islam with these Western ideologies bespeaks
of extreme ignorance.
No, it speaks of a true understanding of the nature of the Islamic ideology,
history, and its fundamental extremism as it compares to all the other
philosophies and ways of life on this planet. You think that Fascism is a
strictly a Western invention? You are either the ignorant one, or a
bold-faced liar. Fascist slogans and propaganda spill out more and more from
the Islamic world, but Muslims are such spiritually narcissistic
supremacists that they are blinded to it. Islam is Fascism. Islamic
scripture is filled with it, and Islamic rhetoric reinforces it. Death to
infidels. Death to Freedom. Death to the West. Death to apostates. Islam is
so totally motivated by hatred and death that it is sickening. That Muslims
unquestionably believe it and believe that some paradise exists after death
for perpetrating it is insane. The bipolar mind of the Muslim is no mystery
to people who have been raised in societies built on the free flow and
debate of ideas, so foreign to the Islamic world. Muslims are mentally
handicapped. Their minds are stagnant, relying on archaic ideas of truth,
that only regress them in a world that stops for no man. You are the
ignorant one, and symptomatically so as to not even realize the depth of it.
Muslims, through their actions, warrant no respect either.
Muslims can say the same thing about other faiths and can easily make life
miserable for millions of Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Animists
who live as minorities in their countries.
Whose numbers are dwindling, year after year, as they do say those things,
and as Muslims now follow them out to the West and bring their contempt,
fatalistic uselessness, vengeance, and violence with them. All the other
religions you mention are under attack by Muslims. There is virtually no
other religion on the planet that is spilling the blood of non-believers for
their God(s) like Muslims. On every continent Muslims are preaching hate,
and acting out on it, and the trend is growing as Muslim frustration and
desperation rises from the plight they carry in their black hearts and vapid
minds. Allahu Akbar is a battle cry, and it is a sick incarnation of the
sheer delusion that Islam creates in the warped minds who swallow the lies.
In the West peoples of all faiths are free to worship, build temples, and
proselytize. The same can not be said equivocally of anywhere Islamic near
any degree worthy of reasonable comparison. That is why the West is a magnet
and example for peoples from the World over, and why stagnant and intolerant
Islamic countries are mired in corruption, dictatorship, and poverty.
For your bigotry, they will pay a price. In the end, Muslims will be
persecuted in the West and other religions would suffer in the Muslim
world. If that's what you want, a divided world, I am sure there are a lot
of haters on each side who would welcome that idea. The choice is yours.
Here we go again. Muslims trying to project their guilt and hate upon
others. "A divided world"? You mean like Dar-ul-Islam and Dar-ul-Harb? Like
Muslims and Infidels? Believers and non-believers? This is what emanates
from Islam and Muslims all over the world, and you expect us to not notice?
Muslims are being "persecuted" in the West by cartoons of all things, after
decades of taking them in, and giving them a chance to live free lives in
prosperous societies where opportunities flourish like generations of
peoples before them, and look what happens. Muslims have failed. They have
brought their gutter religion with them, and even with all the Freedom and
tolerance that Western society has afforded them, they fail, flounder, and
fall back to their archaic and idiotic practices of their submissive Arab
tribal sicknesses. The total lack of integration of Muslims in Western
societies is a phenomenon distinct to Muslims, and you are trying to tell us
that the humanistic divisions Muslims bring with them is in the future? The
divided world you predict is here, now, everywhere. Sunnis killing Shia,
Muslims killing non-Muslims, threats abounding, and all in the name of their
God and their so-called "prophet". That you expect non-Muslims to not notice
that it is part and parcel of what comes linked intrinsically and explicitly
with Islam is so totally a projection of ignorance as to what would not so
long ago be seen as surprising, but now just sad. Sad, sick, and the world
has had enough. On September 11th, 2001 the whole world saw what comes with
Muslims. Now nearly 5 years later, the picture is even clearer, and more
people are seeing it.
***** Islam. Vicious Arab Imperialism cloaked in a sheath of lies.
***** Mohammad. A thief, murderer, slave-trader, pimp. and pedophile.
***** Allah. Who if anything fits perfectly the definition of SATAN more than
any God.
And ***** You for thinking that infidels are as ignorant as you wish they
were.
.
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
12 Feb 2006 07:07:21 PM |
|
|
"Since President Bush has dedicated our total economic output, and our
total military to a policy of Israel first, not America first, he has
pushed us into massive debt, gotten us chained to a disastrous and
counterproductive war that will have no positive end, and wants to
stave poor Americans to pay for his bad decisions and his perverted
ego
trip. Hillary Clinton is on the same page as Bush and has dedicated
herself to the State of Israel as her God above all. America has
become a nation of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews. The Jews
have the money and since our Government runs on money, not on votes,
our leaders do not care if they destroy the world defending Israel's
illegal ability to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Palestine,
their own home. Because Palestinians are trying to defend their legal
home against an illegal occupation which we have financed for over
fifty years, we brand them as "terrorists." Bush, the Evangelicals,
and Neoconservative Democrats like Hillary Clinton do not give a
tinkers damn about our Constitution, our freedom, and our sovereignty.
Our real enemy is AIPAC, the America Israel Public Affairs Committee,
which runs Washington. The reason they are getting away with this is
that most Christian Americans are idiots, pure and simple. Israel is
our OWNER, not our "ally," and America is a Jewish owned corporation,
not a "democracy." Wake up! The American people are dull and stupid
and easily tricked, and now we are paying the price for our ridiculous
Zionist constructed view of the world, where Israel always comes
first,
even before God, our own children, our economy, international law,
basic human rights, multiple UN Resolutions, and our national
sovereignty, which we have lost.
Bush has done far more damage to America than Osama bin Laden Bin
Laden
ever has. Bush has killed more innocent people, wasted more money
(over half a trillion dollars), and effectively wiped his ***** with the
United States Constitution, which is far worse than burning our flag.
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin would hate
Bush and his Neoconservative/Zionist movement, which has destroyed
everything our founding leaders wanted. Our founding fathers made
allot of terrible mistakes, but at least they believed in America
first, not Britain first, and they certainly would not give a damn
about Israel, a nation based on an un-American and anti-American
philosophy. Israel wants to drain us dry, to use us in every way
possible for their own dishonest and illegal gain, and anyone who
opposes them is destroyed by the US media, which is so Zionist
dominated that few voices of dissent are ever heard. Americans are
free to worship Israel any way they want, as long as they worship
Israel first as our God and Master. Israel and the Zionists are
exactly equivalent to George Orwell's "BIG BROTHER" in our society.
We
have given all power and control to them, and have destroyed anyone
who
murmurs the slightest dissent, and then we have the nerve to bomb and
illegally invade other countries in the name of "freedom." We murder
for "freedom," we torture for "freedom," we plant false stories in the
press for "freedom," and we spy on our own citizens illegally for
"freedom." Orwellian doublespeak is rampant!
IB
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mud Hut Mafioso" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
12 Feb 2006 07:47:47 PM |
|
|
Hmmmm. Let's see. A indictment of Islam and someone responds with
revisionist crack about Bush and the Jews. More proof of the donkey brains
of Muslims.
"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ftmvu1pdku2ot2auei8sjkc419vosskmh7@4ax.com...
"Since President Bush has dedicated our total economic output, and our
total military to a policy of Israel first, not America first, he has
pushed us into massive debt, gotten us chained to a disastrous and
counterproductive war that will have no positive end, and wants to
stave poor Americans to pay for his bad decisions and his perverted
ego
trip. Hillary Clinton is on the same page as Bush and has dedicated
herself to the State of Israel as her God above all. America has
become a nation of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews. The Jews
have the money and since our Government runs on money, not on votes,
our leaders do not care if they destroy the world defending Israel's
illegal ability to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Palestine,
their own home. Because Palestinians are trying to defend their legal
home against an illegal occupation which we have financed for over
fifty years, we brand them as "terrorists." Bush, the Evangelicals,
and Neoconservative Democrats like Hillary Clinton do not give a
tinkers damn about our Constitution, our freedom, and our sovereignty.
Our real enemy is AIPAC, the America Israel Public Affairs Committee,
which runs Washington. The reason they are getting away with this is
that most Christian Americans are idiots, pure and simple. Israel is
our OWNER, not our "ally," and America is a Jewish owned corporation,
not a "democracy." Wake up! The American people are dull and stupid
and easily tricked, and now we are paying the price for our ridiculous
Zionist constructed view of the world, where Israel always comes
first,
even before God, our own children, our economy, international law,
basic human rights, multiple UN Resolutions, and our national
sovereignty, which we have lost.
Bush has done far more damage to America than Osama bin Laden Bin
Laden
ever has. Bush has killed more innocent people, wasted more money
(over half a trillion dollars), and effectively wiped his ***** with the
United States Constitution, which is far worse than burning our flag.
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin would hate
Bush and his Neoconservative/Zionist movement, which has destroyed
everything our founding leaders wanted. Our founding fathers made
allot of terrible mistakes, but at least they believed in America
first, not Britain first, and they certainly would not give a damn
about Israel, a nation based on an un-American and anti-American
philosophy. Israel wants to drain us dry, to use us in every way
possible for their own dishonest and illegal gain, and anyone who
opposes them is destroyed by the US media, which is so Zionist
dominated that few voices of dissent are ever heard. Americans are
free to worship Israel any way they want, as long as they worship
Israel first as our God and Master. Israel and the Zionists are
exactly equivalent to George Orwell's "BIG BROTHER" in our society.
We
have given all power and control to them, and have destroyed anyone
who
murmurs the slightest dissent, and then we have the nerve to bomb and
illegally invade other countries in the name of "freedom." We murder
for "freedom," we torture for "freedom," we plant false stories in the
press for "freedom," and we spy on our own citizens illegally for
"freedom." Orwellian doublespeak is rampant!
IB
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
15 Feb 2006 06:04:58 AM |
|
|
By Dr. William Pierce
"Last week I gave an interview to an English-language radio station in
Teheran. The program was "The Islamic Voice of Iran." We talked about
a number of things, including Ariel Sharon's visit to the White House,
which was taking place at the time, and about President Bush's
popularity ratings. The Iranian interviewer asked me whether Bush
would take a more sensible, pro-American policy in the Middle East or
would continue taking orders from Israel, to the detriment of American
interests, the way the Clinton administration had.
Of course, I explained to him that there was really no difference
between Republicans and Democrats in that regard. They both dance to
whatever tune the Jews are playing at the moment, and that George Bush
would no more dare to disobey the Jews than Bill Clinton would. I told
the Iranian interviewer that there are minor differences between the
Republican Party and the Democratic Party, with the Democrats
pandering a bit more to the welfare class and the Republicans paying a
bit more lip service to things such as military preparedness and
energy production, but that on the really essential issues --
immigration, racial policy, media control, foreign policy -- both
parties do what they're told and don't give the Jews any back talk.
The Iranian had a hard time understanding this. If one party - the
Democrats, say -- were controlled by Jews and supported Jewish
interests, then surely there would be another party -- presumably the
Republicans -- representing the interests of the American people. He
couldn't understand how the Jews, making up only 2.5 per cent of the
U.S. population, could have the whole political process under their
control and in particular could dictate U.S. foreign policy in the
Middle East, regardless of who is in the White House and which party
controls the Congress. What about the other 97.5 per cent of the
population? They also have interests, and they can vote. Why aren't
their interests supported by some political party?
The difficulty my Iranian interviewer had in understanding how
politics works in America has two facets. One of these is the dominant
influence the mass media of news and entertainment, which are largely
in the hands of the country's very small Jewish minority, have on
public opinion and attitudes, on the mass culture, and on the
political process. In Iran tradition is much more important in
determining public opinion. And Iran
is a much more homogeneous country, at least in a cultural and
religious sense, than is the United States. In America the media have
to a large extent weaned the people away from their traditions and
from their cultural and religious roots and substituted a
made-in-Hollywood trash-culture with ersatz traditions in their place.
The media are increasingly important in influencing public opinion
everywhere in the developed countries -- even in Iran, no doubt -- but
nowhere has the process been as thorough and as destructive as it has
been in the United States.
A second barrier to understanding is the subtlety and indirection
which is used by the media bosses in achieving their aims. They almost
never make a head-on attack against the traditions or values of the
host population. They look for conflict, for inconsistency, for vice
or hypocrisy or weakness, and they exploit it to gain a foothold. Then
they use one facet of popular belief or tradition to undermine
another. For example, they will proclaim themselves champions of "fair
play," and then they will persuade the public that fair play requires
that no distinction be made between Asians and Europeans in setting
immigration policy. If we let Englishmen and Germans and Swedes into
America, then
it wouldn't be fair to keep out Vietnamese and Chinese and Pakistanis,
they tell us.
Or they will play on the average American's resentment of governmental
interference in his private affairs to promote the idea that
homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality and that neither
the government nor individuals should make a distinction between the
two. What people do in the privacy of their bedrooms is no one else's
business, therefore the government should require landlords,
employers, Boy Scout troops, and everyone else to treat homosexuals
just like heterosexuals: a bit of a non sequitur, but the media have
been remarkably successful at using such illogical arguments to shift
public opinion on a number of issues.
And because the media are able to influence public opinion so
strongly, all the politicians, Republicans as well as Democrats, dance
to their tune. The politicians understand that the tiny Jewish
minority, only 2.5 per cent of the population, through their control
of the media are the single most important influence on the public's
perception of issues, of
government policies, and of the politicians themselves - and
consequently are the single most important influence on the outcome of
elections. And it is for this reason that everyone can safely count on
George Bush's policy toward Israel being whatever the Jews want it to
be.
Anyway, although I explained this as clearly as I could to my Iranian
interrogator, I think he didn't really believe me. He was ready to
accept the fact that the Jews are a very bad influence on American
policy in the Middle East, but he couldn't accept the fact that
through their control of the mass media of news and entertainment they
have made
irrelevant and meaningless the whole idea of mass democracy. He
couldn't assimilate the idea that party politics in America has become
just a shell game to keep the rubes confused about what's really
happening and who's running the country. He knew that Jews are bad
news, but he couldn't grasp the fact that the most powerful country in
the world, economically and militarily, is so totally in their malign
grip.
And really, when I try to put myself in the Iranian's shoes, it's hard
for me to believe it myself: a mere 2.5 per cent of the population, a
historically despised and hated group who have been kicked out of
every country in Europe, and there's not a single mainstream American
politician brave enough to defy them; a tiny, clannish group who have
a
stranglehold on the mighty American nation; a case of the tail wagging
the dog. How do they do it? It doesn't seem possible.
Well, of course, it is possible, and I'll tell you how they do it:
they do it with images and myths. They do it by controlling the
perceptions that most people have of the world around themselves. The
Jews create myths about what the world is like and then generate false
images to match the myths. And they project these myths and false
images of the
world into the minds of their hosts.
I'll give you a specific example of this. There is a new film out by
Universal Pictures. It's called The Fast and the Furious. It's a film
directed at White teenagers, a film designed to give them a particular
image of the world and instill in them a myth about the way the world
works. It's a film about modern, urban teenagers -- specifically
street gangs in Los Angeles -- and cars and street racing. That might
seem harmless enough, but the street racing is just a gimmick on which
to hang the message, and that message is that the world is
multicultural, and it's good that it's multicultural. It's good not to
live in a White
world, with White friends and White role models and White values and
White standards and traditions. That's boring. That's not cool.
The message is that there's nothing special about being White. The
message is that if one is White, then one should hang out with Blacks
and Asians and mestizos. One should behave like non-Whites, talk like
them, dress like them, be like them. That's what's cool. That's what's
sexy. That's what everybody who's really cool is doing. And when you
feel like having some sex, you just reach for whoever is nearest. It
doesn't matter at all what race the other person is. If you're a White
girl, it's especially cool to have sex with a Black or Asian or
mestizo male.
That's the most obvious message of the film, but actually it's more
than that. It's not really that the film says race doesn't matter,
that we're really all the same; that culture doesn't matter, that all
cultures are equivalent. The film says that Whites should become
non-White, because non-White is better. The cultural milieu of the
film is not raceless or
a little of this and a little of that. The cultural milieu is Black.
The culture is hip-hop. The music is hip-hop. The clothing style, with
the baggy shorts and the rest, is hip-hop. It's Black. That is the
world into which White teenagers should blend, the world to which they
should subordinate themselves.
Surely, White teenagers aren't actually absorbing that message. Are
they? Yes, unfortunately, many of them are. The Fast and the Furious
is drawing bigger crowds than any other film produced by Hollywood
this season. It grossed $78 million in its first ten days. White
teenagers are flocking to it more than to any other movie. The
attraction, of
course, is the action, the street racing, the exciting car stunts.
That's the gimmick that pulls them in. But that's not the message. The
message -- which of course, is subliminal: that is, which is intended
to change the kids' perception of the world at a subconscious level -
is exactly what I just described: it's cool to be part of the hip-hop
culture; it's cool to be multicultural; it's cool not to act White,
think White, or be White.
That's the message, and it's a Jewish message: Jewish in its
conception, Jewish in its promotion, Jewish in its genocidal intent.
You think I'm imagining things? I'll read to you from a story about
the film in last Saturday's edition of the Los Angeles Times. I quote:
"Hollywood was stunned when the youth-oriented action film The Fast
and the Furious streaked past the competition to become the number-one
movie. With its relatively unknown cast of Latinos, Asians, and
African-Americans, heavy doses of high-speed chases, and a driving
hip-hop soundtrack, the movie defied expectations . . . But the
teen-oriented movie's success isn't so surprising when one glimpses
the youthful crowds flocking to theaters . . . . With their
ultra-baggy
cargo shorts, doo-rags wrapped around their heads, and bodies
festooned with tattoos and piercings, the look of these young
moviegoers mirrors the multiethnic melange of actors on the screen. .
.. .
"Hollywood likes to pride itself on being ahead of the cultural curve,
but with last summer's sassy white-versus-black cheerleading comedy
Bring It On grossing $68.4 million domestically and this winter's Save
the Last Dance, with its once-taboo interracial dating, raking in more
than $90 million in North America alone, the studios have only begun
to catch up with the colorblind nature of today's MTV generation.
"Rob Cohen, who directed The Fast and the Furious, said the film not
only reflects today's "multiculti" youth culture without purposely
drawing attention to it, but depicts what is really going on. When the
movie opened, it drew a cross-section of races, Cohen said. Surveys
taken at theaters where The Fast and the Furious played showed that 50
per cent of moviegoers were white, 24 per cent were Hispanic, 10 per
cent were black, and 11 per cent were Asian. "I look at this and go,
'This is exactly what I'm talking about,'" Cohen said. . . .
Attracting a young audience across the country -- a mainstay of big
summer popcorn hits -- The Fast and the Furious has grossed an
estimated $78 million in
less than two weeks and is on track to make well over $100 million."
-- end of quote --
I want to emphasize a couple of things in what I just read to you,
besides the fact that the director of the film is the Jew Rob Cohen
and the studio is Universal Pictures, owned by the Jew Edgar Bronfman.
First, note that Mr. Cohen is very much aware of the racial angle in
his film. That's all he talks about, not the racing stunts. And note
that he says he put the racial propaganda into his film in way that
would not "draw attention to it": that is, he put it in as subliminal
propaganda.
One other thing: the story in the Los Angeles Times implies that this
film and other films like it are imitating society, not the other way
around. But that's not true. These Jewish films are propaganda
deliberately designed to move society in the direction the Jews want
it to go. White kids didn't start wearing baggy shorts and backward
baseball caps and listening to rap music and using jive talk just
because that's what young Blacks were doing: it was Jewish films and
Jewish television and Jewish advertising that pushed them in this
direction, that persuaded them it is cool to imitate Blacks.
The Times story refers to the studios catching up with "today's MTV
generation." But really, how did it become the "MTV generation"? That
name is appropriate just because it is MTV which has been the single
largest influence on White teenagers in moving them away from their
roots in their own race and making rootless cosmopolitans out of them.
MTV has been the foremost promoter of the hip-hop lifestyle among
young Whites. And I hardly need to remind you that it is the very
Jewish Sumner Redstone, originally known as Murray Rothstein to his
parents, who owns MTV. Redstone's MTV and his Paramount Pictures
studio may be a little ahead of the other Hollywood studios, but
they're all pushing in the same direction as hard as they can.
This is an essential point: namely, that the Jewish media are pushing
our society, and not the other way around, and the Jews are
understandably reluctant to admit that. Last Saturday's Los Angeles
Times story interviewed another Jewish film producer in this regard,
and I quote from the story: "Marc Abraham, one of the producers of
Bring It
On, noted: 'There is a much more interracial aspect in today's culture
than the way this country used to be. Any movie that reflects that --
and it doesn't mean they'll all be hits like The Fast and the Furious
-- will ring true with the audience.'" -- end of quote --
As I indicated, that is deliberate misdirection. And there's more
misdirection in the Times story. It also interviews the Black director
of Sumner Redstone's racemixing film Save the Last Dance, and I quote:
"'The movie business is certainly catching up with what's happening in
society,' said Thomas Carter, who directed Save the Last Dance. 'Youth
culture has been shifting a long time . . . . Places like MTV are
right on the edge and totally involved in the change. In filmmaking we
lag behind.'" -- end of quote -- But of course, Redstone's MTV, which
as Carter notes is "totally involved in the change," is into
filmmaking too. Anyway, it's really an artificial distinction to
contrast Jewish television with Jewish cinema. Redsone isn't the only
Jewish media boss who is deeply involved in both media.
One of Bronfman's subordinates, the Jew Marc Shmuger, says it a little
more plainly, and again I quote from last Saturday's Los Angeles Times
story: "'I think the segregated groupings are breaking down in today's
America, and I think today's movie audience is a complex mix,' said
Marc Shmuger, vice chairman of Universal Pictures, which released The
Fast and the Furious. But Shmuger warned that if the movie industry
starts making multiethnic movies 'in a calculating and cynical
fashion,' the audience will sense that and stay away." -- end of quote
-- In other words, keep the propaganda subtle, keep it subliminal, so
that we don't tip off the goyim that it's really propaganda.
I'll read one more section from the Los Angeles Times story. I quote:
"Just as The Fast and the Furious shows young people of all races
gathered in large groups unmindful of their racial differences and not
hung up on sex, Gary Scott Thompson, one of the film's writers, said
today's young movie audiences also are that way. 'It used to be that a
boy and a girl would go on a date,' he said. 'Now what's happening is
groups of kids who are friends -- multiracial boys and girls -- all
move in date packs together. It's like a date, but they don't consider
it dating. Some of them might neck; some of them might not. None of
them think anything much about it. They are much more open when
talking about sex . . . They've broken down the cultural barriers.' .
.. . Rob Friedman, vice chairman of Paramount Pictures Motion Picture
Group, said the studio began noticing the colorblind nature of young
audiences with its 1999 high school pigskin drama Varsity Blues. 'It's
really about their peers, regardless of race, and to a certain extent
gender as well,' Friedman said. 'When it came to Save the Last Dance,
it became more and more apparent young people don't care whether the
relationship is interracial. The music is great, the story is great.'"
-- end of quote --
As I've already mentioned, Paramount Pictures belongs to Sumner
Redstone, and I hardly need to tell you that his employee Rob Friedman
is a Jew, like nearly all the other executives at Paramount Pictures.
This new development of White teenagers running in "date packs," as
the scriptwriter put it, with Blacks, Asians, and mestizos and having
very casual and very interracial sex did not evolve spontaneously, as
the media bosses and their employees would have us believe. It has
been promoted deliberately by Hollywood and by television and by
Madison Avenue. Sumner Redstone's MTV may be a bit bolder in this
regard than
the other Jewish media, but all of them have been working together for
decades toward the same goal, and that goal is the annihilation of our
people. They say, "Oh, we're just reflecting with our films and our TV
shows and our magazine ads what your society has become all by
itself," but that is a conscious, calculated lie. They know exactly
what they
have done and are doing, and one can easily sense them gloating over
it when one reads their remarks in the Los Angeles Times.
I've said this a thousand times already in different words, but when
we permitted the Jews to come into our society and take over our mass
media of news and entertainment -- our newspapers and our radio
broadcasting networks and our motion picture and advertising
industries and then television broadcasting -- we handed them the
weapons with which they intended from the beginning to destroy us and
now are destroying us. This program of theirs to corrupt and destroy
us didn't begin with the Second World War and the so-called
"Holocaust." It is a consequence of their nature. The "Holocaust" was
not the cause of their destructive behavior, but rather a consequence.
If you believe that I am hallucinating when I say that, see for
yourself what Jews such as Edgar Bronfman and Sumner Redstone are
producing for the entertainment of our children, and you try to
explain it in any other way. I know that the majority of our own
people, lemmings that they are, are dancing to the Jews' tune now,
along with the politicians. That is a shame, but it in no way excuses
us from our task. Many of those who have become blinded by the Jews
and have become collaborators of the Jews will unavoidably become
"collateral damage" in the struggle and the chaos which lie ahead, but
we must do whatever is necessary to free our people from the spell
cast over them by the Jews. To that task I have consecrated my life,
and I invite each of you to do likewise.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
15 Feb 2006 07:19:22 AM |
|
|
Topaz wrote:
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:
[rest of racist ideology deleted.]
Follow this. If race is important because of inequalities in
intelligence inherent per race, the implication is that INTELLIGENCE is
what establishes a person's value in the white supremacist's scheme. If
intelligence is so important, then why is race in the equation at all?
Why make RACE the trait of value when it's INTELLIGENCE that matters?
I remember once in another newsgroup you said one of the dumbest things
I'd ever heard. You said that THOMAS KINKADE represented the only real
art. In a single stroke of ignorance, you dismissed all other artists,
and you went after "modern art" in particular. That you can't
comprehend modern art shows you're of a lower intelligence. Clearly
people who can comprehend it, as I do, will disagree.
Now to this. If an average intelligence LOWER than the average
intelligence of the white race mars the acceptability of that race, it
follows that YOU -- having proven to be of lower-than-average
intelligence by your previous statement on art -- have a marred
acceptability. It follows then that YOU are someone with whom someone
else of AVERAGE intelligence -- someone, say, who can appreciate an
artist other than Thomas Kinkade -- should not mingle.
True?
True.
But you've made RACE the defining category, thereby borrowing YOUR value
from the betters of your own race. Luckily for you, our averages are
high enough to carry you.
--
Alric Knebel
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
17 Feb 2006 08:37:45 PM |
|
|
Follow this. If race is important because of inequalities in
intelligence inherent per race, the implication is that INTELLIGENCE is
what establishes a person's value in the white supremacist's scheme. If
intelligence is so important, then why is race in the equation at all?
Why make RACE the trait of value when it's INTELLIGENCE that matters?
Whites are also very good looking. We should preserve the White race.
There is no group that is trying to have a nation just for intelligent
people. But White Nationalism already exists. This is what we want. So
now non-Whites and liberals are trying to talk us into wanting
something else. It's obvious where they are coming from. The Chinese
have China, there are Black countries for the Blacks. We should have a
nation for Whites.
That said, I remember once in another thread you said one of the dumbest
things I'd ever heard. You said that THOMAS KINKADE represented the
only real art.
Except I didn't say anything about it being the only real art. It
is an example of real art while modern art is simply garbage.
In a single stroke of ignorance, you dismissed all other
artists,
Except that that never happened.
and you went after "modern art" in particular. That you can't
comprehend modern art shows you're of a lower intelligence, as there are
many people who have the intelligence to comprehend it.
Remember the story about the king with no clothes?
Now to this. If an average intelligence LOWER than the average
intelligence of the white race mars the acceptability of that race, it
follows that YOU -- having proven to be of lower-than-average
intelligence by your previous statement on art -- have a marred
acceptability. It follows then that YOU are someone with whom someone
else of AVERAGE intelligence -- someone, say, who can appreciate an
artist other than Thomas Kinkade -- should not mingle.
True?
True.
But you've made RACE the defining category, thereby borrowing YOUR value
from the betters of your own race. Luckily for you, our averages are
high enough to carry you.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
18 Feb 2006 07:27:53 AM |
|
|
Topaz wrote:
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:
[rest of racist ideology deleted.]
Follow this. If race is important because of inequalities in
intelligence inherent per race, the implication is that INTELLIGENCE is
what establishes a person's value in the white supremacist's scheme. If
intelligence is so important, then why is race in the equation at all?
Why make RACE the trait of value when it's INTELLIGENCE that matters?
I remember once in another newsgroup you said one of the dumbest things
I'd ever heard. You said that THOMAS KINKADE represented the only real
art. In a single stroke of ignorance, you dismissed all other artists,
and you went after "modern art" in particular. That you can't
comprehend modern art shows you're of a lower intelligence. Clearly
people who can comprehend it, as I do, will disagree.
Now to this. If an average intelligence LOWER than the average
intelligence of the white race mars the acceptability of that race, it
follows that YOU -- having proven to be of lower-than-average
intelligence by your previous statement on art -- have a marred
acceptability. It follows then that YOU are someone with whom someone
else of AVERAGE intelligence -- someone, say, who can appreciate an
artist other than Thomas Kinkade -- should not mingle.
True?
True.
But you've made RACE the defining category, thereby borrowing YOUR value
from the betters of your own race. Luckily for you, our averages are
high enough to carry you.
--
Alric Knebel
.
|
|
|
| User: "Acharya" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
23 Feb 2006 05:33:52 AM |
|
|
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11ve86qohbvu1a8@corp.supernews.com...
Topaz wrote:
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:
[rest of racist ideology deleted.]
Follow this. If race is important because of inequalities in intelligence
inherent per race, the implication is that INTELLIGENCE is what
establishes a person's value in the white supremacist's scheme. If
intelligence is so important, then why is race in the equation at all? Why
make RACE the trait of value when it's INTELLIGENCE that matters?
I remember once in another newsgroup you said one of the dumbest things
I'd ever heard. You said that THOMAS KINKADE represented the only real
art. In a single stroke of ignorance, you dismissed all other artists,
and you went after "modern art" in particular. That you can't comprehend
modern art shows you're of a lower intelligence. Clearly people who can
comprehend it, as I do, will disagree.
Now to this. If an average intelligence LOWER than the average
intelligence of the white race mars the acceptability of that race, it
follows that YOU -- having proven to be of lower-than-average intelligence
by your previous statement on art -- have a marred acceptability. It
follows then that YOU are someone with whom someone else of AVERAGE
intelligence -- someone, say, who can appreciate an artist other than
Thomas Kinkade -- should not mingle.
True?
True.
But you've made RACE the defining category, thereby borrowing YOUR value
from the betters of your own race. Luckily for you, our averages are high
enough to carry you.
--
Alric Knebel
I think you just went one step beyond the outer limits of his twilight zone.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ordog" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
12 Feb 2006 08:47:05 PM |
|
|
Mud Hut Mafioso wrote:
Hmmmm. Let's see. A indictment of Islam and someone responds with
revisionist crack about Bush and the Jews. More proof of the donkey brains
of Muslims.
Hmmm. Someone who does not declare where he is coming from.
Please state your actual position!
Here are your posibble options:
1 You are a Xtian. Your god is mightier than theirs.
2 You are a Hindu. Your gods are mightier than theirs.
3 You are a Jew. You hate the guts of every Arab so you engage in
muslim bashing for a good measure.
4 You are a neocon moron. You hate the guts of everyone who does not
tow the political line of the White House.
5 You are a racist who hates everyone who does not fit the description
of a white supremacist.
Please note that if applicable multiple selections are also possible.
=D6rd=F6g
"Beware of the man whose God is in the skies." Bernard Shaw
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
12 Feb 2006 08:54:52 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:47:47 -0500, "Mud Hut Mafioso"
<mudhut@mafioso.com> wrote:
Hmmmm. Let's see. A indictment of Islam and someone responds with
revisionist crack about Bush and the Jews. More proof of the donkey brains
of Muslims.
Me thinks Topaz might be sporting a shaved head and/or a one inch
mustache under his nose.
"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ftmvu1pdku2ot2auei8sjkc419vosskmh7@4ax.com...
"Since President Bush has dedicated our total economic output, and our
total military to a policy of Israel first, not America first, he has
pushed us into massive debt, gotten us chained to a disastrous and
counterproductive war that will have no positive end, and wants to
stave poor Americans to pay for his bad decisions and his perverted
ego
trip. Hillary Clinton is on the same page as Bush and has dedicated
herself to the State of Israel as her God above all. America has
become a nation of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews. The Jews
have the money and since our Government runs on money, not on votes,
our leaders do not care if they destroy the world defending Israel's
illegal ability to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Palestine,
their own home. Because Palestinians are trying to defend their legal
home against an illegal occupation which we have financed for over
fifty years, we brand them as "terrorists." Bush, the Evangelicals,
and Neoconservative Democrats like Hillary Clinton do not give a
tinkers damn about our Constitution, our freedom, and our sovereignty.
Our real enemy is AIPAC, the America Israel Public Affairs Committee,
which runs Washington. The reason they are getting away with this is
that most Christian Americans are idiots, pure and simple. Israel is
our OWNER, not our "ally," and America is a Jewish owned corporation,
not a "democracy." Wake up! The American people are dull and stupid
and easily tricked, and now we are paying the price for our ridiculous
Zionist constructed view of the world, where Israel always comes
first,
even before God, our own children, our economy, international law,
basic human rights, multiple UN Resolutions, and our national
sovereignty, which we have lost.
Bush has done far more damage to America than Osama bin Laden Bin
Laden
ever has. Bush has killed more innocent people, wasted more money
(over half a trillion dollars), and effectively wiped his ***** with the
United States Constitution, which is far worse than burning our flag.
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin would hate
Bush and his Neoconservative/Zionist movement, which has destroyed
everything our founding leaders wanted. Our founding fathers made
allot of terrible mistakes, but at least they believed in America
first, not Britain first, and they certainly would not give a damn
about Israel, a nation based on an un-American and anti-American
philosophy. Israel wants to drain us dry, to use us in every way
possible for their own dishonest and illegal gain, and anyone who
opposes them is destroyed by the US media, which is so Zionist
dominated that few voices of dissent are ever heard. Americans are
free to worship Israel any way they want, as long as they worship
Israel first as our God and Master. Israel and the Zionists are
exactly equivalent to George Orwell's "BIG BROTHER" in our society.
We
have given all power and control to them, and have destroyed anyone
who
murmurs the slightest dissent, and then we have the nerve to bomb and
illegally invade other countries in the name of "freedom." We murder
for "freedom," we torture for "freedom," we plant false stories in the
press for "freedom," and we spy on our own citizens illegally for
"freedom." Orwellian doublespeak is rampant!
IB
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.co
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "#MMM#" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
13 Feb 2006 03:25:28 AM |
|
|
If this reply is representative of Islamic views, I think is is an
excellent example of the paranoid schizophrenia that Muslims suffer
from. It should be copied and framed as example of Muslim paranoia! Or
is it the Death Wish?
Topaz wrote:
"Since President Bush has dedicated our total economic output, and our
total military to a policy of Israel first, not America first, he has
pushed us into massive debt, gotten us chained to a disastrous and
counterproductive war that will have no positive end, and wants to
stave poor Americans to pay for his bad decisions and his perverted
ego
trip. Hillary Clinton is on the same page as Bush and has dedicated
herself to the State of Israel as her God above all. America has
become a nation of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews. The Jews
have the money and since our Government runs on money, not on votes,
our leaders do not care if they destroy the world defending Israel's
illegal ability to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Palestine,
their own home. Because Palestinians are trying to defend their legal
home against an illegal occupation which we have financed for over
fifty years, we brand them as "terrorists." Bush, the Evangelicals,
and Neoconservative Democrats like Hillary Clinton do not give a
tinkers damn about our Constitution, our freedom, and our sovereignty.
Our real enemy is AIPAC, the America Israel Public Affairs Committee,
which runs Washington. The reason they are getting away with this is
that most Christian Americans are idiots, pure and simple. Israel is
our OWNER, not our "ally," and America is a Jewish owned corporation,
not a "democracy." Wake up! The American people are dull and stupid
and easily tricked, and now we are paying the price for our ridiculous
Zionist constructed view of the world, where Israel always comes
first,
even before God, our own children, our economy, international law,
basic human rights, multiple UN Resolutions, and our national
sovereignty, which we have lost.
Bush has done far more damage to America than Osama bin Laden Bin
Laden
ever has. Bush has killed more innocent people, wasted more money
(over half a trillion dollars), and effectively wiped his ***** with the
United States Constitution, which is far worse than burning our flag.
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin would hate
Bush and his Neoconservative/Zionist movement, which has destroyed
everything our founding leaders wanted. Our founding fathers made
allot of terrible mistakes, but at least they believed in America
first, not Britain first, and they certainly would not give a damn
about Israel, a nation based on an un-American and anti-American
philosophy. Israel wants to drain us dry, to use us in every way
possible for their own dishonest and illegal gain, and anyone who
opposes them is destroyed by the US media, which is so Zionist
dominated that few voices of dissent are ever heard. Americans are
free to worship Israel any way they want, as long as they worship
Israel first as our God and Master. Israel and the Zionists are
exactly equivalent to George Orwell's "BIG BROTHER" in our society.
We
have given all power and control to them, and have destroyed anyone
who
murmurs the slightest dissent, and then we have the nerve to bomb and
illegally invade other countries in the name of "freedom." We murder
for "freedom," we torture for "freedom," we plant false stories in the
press for "freedom," and we spy on our own citizens illegally for
"freedom." Orwellian doublespeak is rampant!
IB
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Old Bloke" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
13 Feb 2006 04:08:39 AM |
|
|
Amen
"#MMM#" <mbplee@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139822728.243816.260820@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
If this reply is representative of Islamic views, I think is is an
excellent example of the paranoid schizophrenia that Muslims suffer
from. It should be copied and framed as example of Muslim paranoia! Or
is it the Death Wish?
Topaz wrote:
"Since President Bush has dedicated our total economic output, and our
total military to a policy of Israel first, not America first, he has
pushed us into massive debt, gotten us chained to a disastrous and
counterproductive war that will have no positive end, and wants to
stave poor Americans to pay for his bad decisions and his perverted
ego
trip. Hillary Clinton is on the same page as Bush and has dedicated
herself to the State of Israel as her God above all. America has
become a nation of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews. The Jews
have the money and since our Government runs on money, not on votes,
our leaders do not care if they destroy the world defending Israel's
illegal ability to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Palestine,
their own home. Because Palestinians are trying to defend their legal
home against an illegal occupation which we have financed for over
fifty years, we brand them as "terrorists." Bush, the Evangelicals,
and Neoconservative Democrats like Hillary Clinton do not give a
tinkers damn about our Constitution, our freedom, and our sovereignty.
Our real enemy is AIPAC, the America Israel Public Affairs Committee,
which runs Washington. The reason they are getting away with this is
that most Christian Americans are idiots, pure and simple. Israel is
our OWNER, not our "ally," and America is a Jewish owned corporation,
not a "democracy." Wake up! The American people are dull and stupid
and easily tricked, and now we are paying the price for our ridiculous
Zionist constructed view of the world, where Israel always comes
first,
even before God, our own children, our economy, international law,
basic human rights, multiple UN Resolutions, and our national
sovereignty, which we have lost.
Bush has done far more damage to America than Osama bin Laden Bin
Laden
ever has. Bush has killed more innocent people, wasted more money
(over half a trillion dollars), and effectively wiped his ***** with the
United States Constitution, which is far worse than burning our flag.
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin would hate
Bush and his Neoconservative/Zionist movement, which has destroyed
everything our founding leaders wanted. Our founding fathers made
allot of terrible mistakes, but at least they believed in America
first, not Britain first, and they certainly would not give a damn
about Israel, a nation based on an un-American and anti-American
philosophy. Israel wants to drain us dry, to use us in every way
possible for their own dishonest and illegal gain, and anyone who
opposes them is destroyed by the US media, which is so Zionist
dominated that few voices of dissent are ever heard. Americans are
free to worship Israel any way they want, as long as they worship
Israel first as our God and Master. Israel and the Zionists are
exactly equivalent to George Orwell's "BIG BROTHER" in our society.
We
have given all power and control to them, and have destroyed anyone
who
murmurs the slightest dissent, and then we have the nerve to bomb and
illegally invade other countries in the name of "freedom." We murder
for "freedom," we torture for "freedom," we plant false stories in the
press for "freedom," and we spy on our own citizens illegally for
"freedom." Orwellian doublespeak is rampant!
IB
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
13 Feb 2006 10:15:11 AM |
|
|
Topaz wrote:
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:
[rest of racist ideology deleted.]
Follow this. If race is important because of inequalities in
intelligence inherent per race, the implication is that INTELLIGENCE is
what establishes a person's value in the white supremacist's scheme. If
intelligence is so important, then why is race in the equation at all?
Why make RACE the trait of value when it's INTELLIGENCE that matters?
I remember once in another newsgroup you said one of the dumbest things
I'd ever heard. You said that THOMAS KINKADE represented the only real
art. In a single stroke of ignorance, you dismissed all other artists,
and you went after "modern art" in particular. That you can't
comprehend modern art shows you're of a lower intelligence. Clearly
people who can comprehend it, as I do, will disagree.
Now to this. If an average intelligence LOWER than the average
intelligence of the white race mars the acceptability of that race, it
follows that YOU -- having proven to be of lower-than-average
intelligence by your previous statement on art -- have a marred
acceptability. It follows then that YOU are someone with whom someone
else of AVERAGE intelligence -- someone, say, who can appreciate an
artist other than Thomas Kinkade -- should not mingle.
True?
True.
But you've made RACE the defining category, thereby borrowing YOUR value
from the betters of your own race. Luckily for you, our averages are
high enough to carry you.
--
Alric Knebel
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
15 Feb 2006 06:06:25 AM |
|
|
Follow this. If race is important because of inequalities in
intelligence inherent per race, the implication is that INTELLIGENCE is
what establishes a person's value in the white supremacist's scheme. If
intelligence is so important, then why is race in the equation at all?
Why make RACE the trait of value when it's INTELLIGENCE that matters?
It wouldn't be a good idea to have a nation just of intelligent
people. What if two parents had a less intelligent child? Would we
deport the child?
We should have a nation for White people. Besides being intelligent
Whites are also very good looking. The Chinese have China, there are
Black countries for the Blacks. We should have a nation for Whites.
That said, I remember once in another thread you said one of the dumbest
things I'd ever heard. You said that THOMAS KINKADE represented the
only real art.
Except I didn't say anything about it being the only real art. It
is an example of real art while modern art is simply garbage.
In a single stroke of ignorance, you dismissed all other
artists,
Except that that never happened.
and you went after "modern art" in particular. That you can't
comprehend modern art shows you're of a lower intelligence, as there are
many people who have the intelligence to comprehend it.
Remember the story about the king with no clothes?
Now to this. If an average intelligence LOWER than the average
intelligence of the white race mars the acceptability of that race, it
follows that YOU -- having proven to be of lower-than-average
intelligence by your previous statement on art -- have a marred
acceptability. It follows then that YOU are someone with whom someone
else of AVERAGE intelligence -- someone, say, who can appreciate an
artist other than Thomas Kinkade -- should not mingle.
True?
True.
But you've made RACE the defining category, thereby borrowing YOUR value
from the betters of your own race. Luckily for you, our averages are
high enough to carry you.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
15 Feb 2006 07:19:35 AM |
|
|
Topaz wrote:
Follow this. If race is important because of inequalities in
intelligence inherent per race, the implication is that INTELLIGENCE is
what establishes a person's value in the white supremacist's scheme. If
intelligence is so important, then why is race in the equation at all?
Why make RACE the trait of value when it's INTELLIGENCE that matters?
It wouldn't be a good idea to have a nation just of intelligent
people. What if two parents had a less intelligent child? Would we
deport the child?
We should have a nation for White people. Besides being intelligent
Whites are also very good looking. The Chinese have China, there are
Black countries for the Blacks. We should have a nation for Whites.
That said, I remember once in another thread you said one of the dumbest
things I'd ever heard. You said that THOMAS KINKADE represented the
only real art.
Except I didn't say anything about it being the only real art. It
is an example of real art while modern art is simply garbage.
In a single stroke of ignorance, you dismissed all other
artists,
Except that that never happened.
and you went after "modern art" in particular. That you can't
comprehend modern art shows you're of a lower intelligence, as there are
many people who have the intelligence to comprehend it.
Remember the story about the king with no clothes?
Now to this. If an average intelligence LOWER than the average
intelligence of the white race mars the acceptability of that race, it
follows that YOU -- having proven to be of lower-than-average
intelligence by your previous statement on art -- have a marred
acceptability. It follows then that YOU are someone with whom someone
else of AVERAGE intelligence -- someone, say, who can appreciate an
artist other than Thomas Kinkade -- should not mingle.
True?
True.
But you've made RACE the defining category, thereby borrowing YOUR value
from the betters of your own race. Luckily for you, our averages are
high enough to carry you.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
Topaz wrote:
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:
[rest of racist ideology deleted.]
Follow this. If race is important because of inequalities in
intelligence inherent per race, the implication is that INTELLIGENCE is
what establishes a person's value in the white supremacist's scheme. If
intelligence is so important, then why is race in the equation at all?
Why make RACE the trait of value when it's INTELLIGENCE that matters?
I remember once in another newsgroup you said one of the dumbest things
I'd ever heard. You said that THOMAS KINKADE represented the only real
art. In a single stroke of ignorance, you dismissed all other artists,
and you went after "modern art" in particular. That you can't
comprehend modern art shows you're of a lower intelligence. Clearly
people who can comprehend it, as I do, will disagree.
Now to this. If an average intelligence LOWER than the average
intelligence of the white race mars the acceptability of that race, it
follows that YOU -- having proven to be of lower-than-average
intelligence by your previous statement on art -- have a marred
acceptability. It follows then that YOU are someone with whom someone
else of AVERAGE intelligence -- someone, say, who can appreciate an
artist other than Thomas Kinkade -- should not mingle.
True?
True.
But you've made RACE the defining category, thereby borrowing YOUR value
from the betters of your own race. Luckily for you, our averages are
high enough to carry you.
--
Alric Knebel
--
_________________
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "#MMM#" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
12 Feb 2006 03:55:56 PM |
|
|
A devout follower of any religion can never see anything bad of their
beliefs. That is faith!
Mud Hut Mafioso wrote:
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message
If you cannot respect other people's beliefs, you are the savage, or at
least an imp.
"Elemenatal_1" <elemental1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
When a persons "beliefs" are full of *****, as are Islam's, respect is not
deserved.
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message
I can say with lot more evidence that it is you who is full of ***** but
what would that prove? Crude insults are no substitute for a reasoned
argument which it seems you are not capable of.
There is no such thing as a reasoned argument with a Muslim. The primitive
myopic reaction of the unevolved Muslim mind prohibits it, and much as it
prohibits introspection, shame, atonement, or humble adaptation. The time
for any effort towards such has long gone. Your Jihad, Holy War, terrorism,
violent protests, and outright contempt for all other religions has seen to
that. Islam is full of *****. It is based on the mother of all lies, and the
overcompensation that Muslims desperately engage in to delude themselves of
this fact yields misery for all Humanity. Every day Muslims are causing
problems all over the world, and patience is getting very, very thin. Not
so long ago, you would find Muslims everywhere proselytizing that Islam is a
"religion of peace". You don't hear that coming from them anymore. Through
the increasing inability of Muslims to control their violent nature, and
through non-Muslims becoming more sensitive and inquisitive to things
Islamic, and jaded to the relentless propaganda, perpetrating the exposed
lie became futile for Muslims, so now they're back to the good old "death to
this" and "death to that". As more and more people become shocked out of
their complacency by the savage behavior patterns of Muslims, and decide to
read the Quran and the other heinous rhetoric that boils over from the
dysfunctional Islamic society behind it, the more the real truth of Islam
comes to light. One lie at a time the facade that Muslims prop up is
falling. At some point you are going to have to admit that people know
enough about Islam, as non-Muslims with no intention of converting, to see
Islam for what it is; a religion of death, coercion, contempt, imperialism,
and supremacism like no other religion known to modern man.
Should we all respect the "beliefs" of Fascists? Neo Nazis?
Islam is a world religion, professed by people of all races, nations and
cultures. For you to compare Islam with these Western ideologies bespeaks
of extreme ignorance.
No, it speaks of a true understanding of the nature of the Islamic ideology,
history, and its fundamental extremism as it compares to all the other
philosophies and ways of life on this planet. You think that Fascism is a
strictly a Western invention? You are either the ignorant one, or a
bold-faced liar. Fascist slogans and propaganda spill out more and more from
the Islamic world, but Muslims are such spiritually narcissistic
supremacists that they are blinded to it. Islam is Fascism. Islamic
scripture is filled with it, and Islamic rhetoric reinforces it. Death to
infidels. Death to Freedom. Death to the West. Death to apostates. Islam is
so totally motivated by hatred and death that it is sickening. That Muslims
unquestionably believe it and believe that some paradise exists after death
for perpetrating it is insane. The bipolar mind of the Muslim is no mystery
to people who have been raised in societies built on the free flow and
debate of ideas, so foreign to the Islamic world. Muslims are mentally
handicapped. Their minds are stagnant, relying on archaic ideas of truth,
that only regress them in a world that stops for no man. You are the
ignorant one, and symptomatically so as to not even realize the depth of it.
Muslims, through their actions, warrant no respect either.
Muslims can say the same thing about other faiths and can easily make life
miserable for millions of Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Animists
who live as minorities in their countries.
Whose numbers are dwindling, year after year, as they do say those things,
and as Muslims now follow them out to the West and bring their contempt,
fatalistic uselessness, vengeance, and violence with them. All the other
religions you mention are under attack by Muslims. There is virtually no
other religion on the planet that is spilling the blood of non-believers for
their God(s) like Muslims. On every continent Muslims are preaching hate,
and acting out on it, and the trend is growing as Muslim frustration and
desperation rises from the plight they carry in their black hearts and vapid
minds. Allahu Akbar is a battle cry, and it is a sick incarnation of the
sheer delusion that Islam creates in the warped minds who swallow the lies.
In the West peoples of all faiths are free to worship, build temples, and
proselytize. The same can not be said equivocally of anywhere Islamic near
any degree worthy of reasonable comparison. That is why the West is a magnet
and example for peoples from the World over, and why stagnant and intolerant
Islamic countries are mired in corruption, dictatorship, and poverty.
For your bigotry, they will pay a price. In the end, Muslims will be
persecuted in the West and other religions would suffer in the Muslim
world. If that's what you want, a divided world, I am sure there are a lot
of haters on each side who would welcome that idea. The choice is yours.
Here we go again. Muslims trying to project their guilt and hate upon
others. "A divided world"? You mean like Dar-ul-Islam and Dar-ul-Harb? Like
Muslims and Infidels? Believers and non-believers? This is what emanates
from Islam and Muslims all over the world, and you expect us to not notice?
Muslims are being "persecuted" in the West by cartoons of all things, after
decades of taking them in, and giving them a chance to live free lives in
prosperous societies where opportunities flourish like generations of
peoples before them, and look what happens. Muslims have failed. They have
brought their gutter religion with them, and even with all the Freedom and
tolerance that Western society has afforded them, they fail, flounder, and
fall back to their archaic and idiotic practices of their submissive Arab
tribal sicknesses. The total lack of integration of Muslims in Western
societies is a phenomenon distinct to Muslims, and you are trying to tell us
that the humanistic divisions Muslims bring with them is in the future? The
divided world you predict is here, now, everywhere. Sunnis killing Shia,
Muslims killing non-Muslims, threats abounding, and all in the name of their
God and their so-called "prophet". That you expect non-Muslims to not notice
that it is part and parcel of what comes linked intrinsically and explicitly
with Islam is so totally a projection of ignorance as to what would not so
long ago be seen as surprising, but now just sad. Sad, sick, and the world
has had enough. On September 11th, 2001 the whole world saw what comes with
Muslims. Now nearly 5 years later, the picture is even clearer, and more
people are seeing it.
***** Islam. Vicious Arab Imperialism cloaked in a sheath of lies.
***** Mohammad. A thief, murderer, slave-trader, pimp. and pedophile.
***** Allah. Who if anything fits perfectly the definition of SATAN more than
any God.
And ***** You for thinking that infidels are as ignorant as you wish they
were.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Abraham" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
12 Feb 2006 09:21:23 AM |
|
|
I don't think it is so much brain damaged but they have very little
brain matter. They are a very low form of life and their brain has not
developed like a human.
Mud Hut Mafioso wrote:
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message
If you cannot respect other people's beliefs, you are the savage, or at
least an imp.
"Elemenatal_1" <elemental1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
When a persons "beliefs" are full of *****, as are Islam's, respect is not
deserved.
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message
I can say with lot more evidence that it is you who is full of ***** but
what would that prove? Crude insults are no substitute for a reasoned
argument which it seems you are not capable of.
There is no such thing as a reasoned argument with a Muslim. The primitive
myopic reaction of the unevolved Muslim mind prohibits it, and much as it
prohibits introspection, shame, atonement, or humble adaptation. The time
for any effort towards such has long gone. Your Jihad, Holy War, terrorism,
violent protests, and outright contempt for all other religions has seen to
that. Islam is full of *****. It is based on the mother of all lies, and the
overcompensation that Muslims desperately engage in to delude themselves of
this fact yields misery for all Humanity. Every day Muslims are causing
problems all over the world, and patience is getting very, very thin. Not
so long ago, you would find Muslims everywhere proselytizing that Islam is a
"religion of peace". You don't hear that coming from them anymore. Through
the increasing inability of Muslims to control their violent nature, and
through non-Muslims becoming more sensitive and inquisitive to things
Islamic, and jaded to the relentless propaganda, perpetrating the exposed
lie became futile for Muslims, so now they're back to the good old "death to
this" and "death to that". As more and more people become shocked out of
their complacency by the savage behavior patterns of Muslims, and decide to
read the Quran and the other heinous rhetoric that boils over from the
dysfunctional Islamic society behind it, the more the real truth of Islam
comes to light. One lie at a time the facade that Muslims prop up is
falling. At some point you are going to have to admit that people know
enough about Islam, as non-Muslims with no intention of converting, to see
Islam for what it is; a religion of death, coercion, contempt, imperialism,
and supremacism like no other religion known to modern man.
Should we all respect the "beliefs" of Fascists? Neo Nazis?
Islam is a world religion, professed by people of all races, nations and
cultures. For you to compare Islam with these Western ideologies bespeaks
of extreme ignorance.
No, it speaks of a true understanding of the nature of the Islamic ideology,
history, and its fundamental extremism as it compares to all the other
philosophies and ways of life on this planet. You think that Fascism is a
strictly a Western invention? You are either the ignorant one, or a
bold-faced liar. Fascist slogans and propaganda spill out more and more from
the Islamic world, but Muslims are such spiritually narcissistic
supremacists that they are blinded to it. Islam is Fascism. Islamic
scripture is filled with it, and Islamic rhetoric reinforces it. Death to
infidels. Death to Freedom. Death to the West. Death to apostates. Islam is
so totally motivated by hatred and death that it is sickening. That Muslims
unquestionably believe it and believe that some paradise exists after death
for perpetrating it is insane. The bipolar mind of the Muslim is no mystery
to people who have been raised in societies built on the free flow and
debate of ideas, so foreign to the Islamic world. Muslims are mentally
handicapped. Their minds are stagnant, relying on archaic ideas of truth,
that only regress them in a world that stops for no man. You are the
ignorant one, and symptomatically so as to not even realize the depth of it.
Muslims, through their actions, warrant no respect either.
Muslims can say the same thing about other faiths and can easily make life
miserable for millions of Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Animists
who live as minorities in their countries.
Whose numbers are dwindling, year after year, as they do say those things,
and as Muslims now follow them out to the West and bring their contempt,
fatalistic uselessness, vengeance, and violence with them. All the other
religions you mention are under attack by Muslims. There is virtually no
other religion on the planet that is spilling the blood of non-believers for
their God(s) like Muslims. On every continent Muslims are preaching hate,
and acting out on it, and the trend is growing as Muslim frustration and
desperation rises from the plight they carry in their black hearts and vapid
minds. Allahu Akbar is a battle cry, and it is a sick incarnation of the
sheer delusion that Islam creates in the warped minds who swallow the lies.
In the West peoples of all faiths are free to worship, build temples, and
proselytize. The same can not be said equivocally of anywhere Islamic near
any degree worthy of reasonable comparison. That is why the West is a magnet
and example for peoples from the World over, and why stagnant and intolerant
Islamic countries are mired in corruption, dictatorship, and poverty.
For your bigotry, they will pay a price. In the end, Muslims will be
persecuted in the West and other religions would suffer in the Muslim
world. If that's what you want, a divided world, I am sure there are a lot
of haters on each side who would welcome that idea. The choice is yours.
Here we go again. Muslims trying to project their guilt and hate upon
others. "A divided world"? You mean like Dar-ul-Islam and Dar-ul-Harb? Like
Muslims and Infidels? Believers and non-believers? This is what emanates
from Islam and Muslims all over the world, and you expect us to not notice?
Muslims are being "persecuted" in the West by cartoons of all things, after
decades of taking them in, and giving them a chance to live free lives in
prosperous societies where opportunities flourish like generations of
peoples before them, and look what happens. Muslims have failed. They have
brought their gutter religion with them, and even with all the Freedom and
tolerance that Western society has afforded them, they fail, flounder, and
fall back to their archaic and idiotic practices of their submissive Arab
tribal sicknesses. The total lack of integration of Muslims in Western
societies is a phenomenon distinct to Muslims, and you are trying to tell us
that the humanistic divisions Muslims bring with them is in the future? The
divided world you predict is here, now, everywhere. Sunnis killing Shia,
Muslims killing non-Muslims, threats abounding, and all in the name of their
God and their so-called "prophet". That you expect non-Muslims to not notice
that it is part and parcel of what comes linked intrinsically and explicitly
with Islam is so totally a projection of ignorance as to what would not so
long ago be seen as surprising, but now just sad. Sad, sick, and the world
has had enough. On September 11th, 2001 the whole world saw what comes with
Muslims. Now nearly 5 years later, the picture is even clearer, and more
people are seeing it.
***** Islam. Vicious Arab Imperialism cloaked in a sheath of lies.
***** Mohammad. A thief, murderer, slave-trader, pimp. and pedophile.
***** Allah. Who if anything fits perfectly the definition of SATAN more than
any God.
And ***** You for thinking that infidels are as ignorant as you wish they
were.
I don't think it is so much brain damaged but they have very little
brain matter. They are a very low form of life and their brain has not
developed like a human.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Old Bloke" |
|
| Title: Re: Do all Muslims have brain-damage? - 1MAN4ALL |
13 Feb 2006 05:01:35 AM |
|
|
I have to agree with you on all aspects. We are pulling out all stops to be
friendly But some of the London bombers were upstanding citizens Beware!!
"Mud Hut Mafioso" <mudhut@mafioso.com> wrote in message
news:PuBHf.52307$1e5.1049546@news20.bellglobal.com...
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message
If you cannot respect other people's beliefs, you are the savage, or
at least an imp.
"Elemenatal_1" <elemental1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
When a persons "beliefs" are full of *****, as are Islam's, respect is
not deserved.
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message
I can say with lot more evidence that it is you who is full of ***** but
what would that prove? Crude insults are no substitute for a reasoned
argument which it seems you are not capable of.
There is no such thing as a reasoned argument with a Muslim. The primitive
myopic reaction of the unevolved Muslim mind prohibits it, and much as it
prohibits introspection, shame, atonement, or humble adaptation. The time
for any effort towards such has long gone. Your Jihad, Holy War,
terrorism, violent protests, and outright contempt for all other religions
has seen to that. Islam is full of *****. It is based on the mother of all
lies, and the overcompensation that Muslims desperately engage in to
delude themselves of this fact yields misery for all Humanity. Every day
Muslims are causing problems all over the world, and patience is getting
very, very thin. Not so long ago, you would find Muslims everywhere
proselytizing that Islam is a "religion of peace". You don't hear that
coming from them anymore. Through the increasing inability of Muslims to
control their violent nature, and through non-Muslims becoming more
sensitive and inquisitive to things Islamic, and jaded to the relentless
propaganda, perpetrating the exposed lie became futile for Muslims, so now
they're back to the good old "death to this" and "death to that". As more
and more people become shocked out of their complacency by the savage
behavior patterns of Muslims, and decide to read the Quran and the other
heinous rhetoric that boils over from the dysfunctional Islamic society
behind it, the more the real truth of Islam comes to light. One lie at a
time the facade that Muslims prop up is falling. At some point you are
going to have to admit that people know enough about Islam, as non-Muslims
with no intention of converting, to see Islam for what it is; a religion
of death, coercion, contempt, imperialism, and supremacism like no other
religion known to modern man.
Should we all respect the "beliefs" of Fascists? Neo Nazis?
Islam is a world religion, professed by people of all races, nations and
cultures. For you to compare Islam with these Western ideologies bespeaks
of extreme ignorance.
No, it speaks of a true understanding of the nature of the Islamic
ideology, history, and its fundamental extremism as it compares to all the
other philosophies and ways of life on this planet. You think that Fascism
is a strictly a Western invention? You are either the ignorant one, or a
bold-faced liar. Fascist slogans and propaganda spill out more and more
from the Islamic world, but Muslims are such spiritually narcissistic
supremacists that they are blinded to it. Islam is Fascism. Islamic
scripture is filled with it, and Islamic rhetoric reinforces it. Death to
infidels. Death to Freedom. Death to the West. Death to apostates. Islam
is so totally motivated by hatred and death that it is sickening. That
Muslims unquestionably believe it and believe that some paradise exists
after death for perpetrating it is insane. The bipolar mind of the Muslim
is no mystery to people who have been raised in societies built on the
free flow and debate of ideas, so foreign to the Islamic world. Muslims
are mentally handicapped. Their minds are stagnant, relying on archaic
ideas of truth, that only regress them in a world that stops for no man.
You are the ignorant one, and symptomatically so as to not even realize
the depth of it.
Muslims, through their actions, warrant no respect either.
Muslims can say the same thing about other faiths and can easily make
life miserable for millions of Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and
Animists who live as minorities in their countries.
Whose numbers are dwindling, year after year, as they do say those things,
and as Muslims now follow them out to the West and bring their contempt,
fatalistic uselessness, vengeance, and violence with them. All the other
religions you mention are under attack by Muslims. There is virtually no
other religion on the planet that is spilling the blood of non-believers
for their God(s) like Muslims. On every continent Muslims are preaching
hate, and acting out on it, and the trend is growing as Muslim frustration
and desperation rises from the plight they carry in their black hearts and
vapid minds. Allahu Akbar is a battle cry, and it is a sick incarnation of
the sheer delusion that Islam creates in the warped minds who swallow the
lies. In the West peoples of all faiths are free to worship, build
temples, and proselytize. The same can not be said equivocally of anywhere
Islamic near any degree worthy of reasonable comparison. That is why the
West is a magnet and example for peoples from the World over, and why
stagnant and intolerant Islamic countries are mired in corruption,
dictatorship, and poverty.
For your bigotry, they will pay a price. In the end, Muslims will be
persecuted in the West and other religions would suffer in the Muslim
world. If that's what you want, a divided world, I am sure there are a
lot of haters on each side who would welcome that idea. The choice is
yours.
Here we go again. Muslims trying to project their guilt and hate upon
others. "A divided world"? You mean like Dar-ul-Islam and Dar-ul-Harb?
Like
Muslims and Infidels? Believers and non-believers? This is what emanates
from Islam and Muslims all over the world, and you expect us to not
notice? Muslims are being "persecuted" in the West by cartoons of all
things, after decades of taking them in, and giving them a chance to live
free lives in prosperous societies where opportunities flourish like
generations of peoples before them, and look what happens. Muslims have
failed. They have brought their gutter religion with them, and even with
all the Freedom and tolerance that Western society has afforded them, they
fail, flounder, and fall back to their archaic and idiotic practices of
their submissive Arab tribal sicknesses. The total lack of integration of
Muslims in Western societies is a phenomenon distinct to Muslims, and you
are trying to tell us that the humanistic divisions Muslims bring with
them is in the future? The divided world you predict is here, now,
everywhere. Sunnis killing Shia, Muslims killing non-Muslims, threats
abounding, and all in the name of their God and their so-called "prophet".
That you expect non-Muslims to not notice that it is part and parcel of
what comes linked intrinsically and explicitly with Islam is so totally a
projection of ignorance as to what would not so long ago be seen as
surprising, but now just sad. Sad, sick, and the world has had enough. On
September 11th, 2001 the whole world saw what comes with Muslims. Now
nearly 5 years later, the picture is even clearer, and more people are
seeing it.
***** Islam. Vicious Arab Imperialism cloaked in a sheath of lies.
***** Mohammad. A thief, murderer, slave-trader, pimp. and pedophile.
***** Allah. Who if anything fits perfectly the definition of SATAN more
than any God.
And **** | |
