Religions > Atheism > Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Simpson" |
| Date: |
20 Dec 2007 06:44:52 PM |
| Object: |
Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
.
|
|
| User: "snausages" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
22 Dec 2007 04:18:19 AM |
|
|
Wisdom from an apple...perhaps we should supply more apples to
Republicans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Simpson" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
22 Dec 2007 09:16:16 AM |
|
|
snausages wrote:
Wisdom from an apple...perhaps we should supply more apples to
Republicans.
I believe that was 'knowledge'.
Wisdom comes from bananas.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "What Me Worry?" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 08:25:25 PM |
|
|
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:U%Daj.439$El5.230@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
Christians pick and choose what they want to believe, as it suits them.
Even the "fundamentalists," who claim the Bible is a literal history,
selectively ignore the parts they don't want to believe.
Not that it matters what a bunch of violent, bigoted wackos think about a
work of fiction.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Raymond" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 09:12:08 PM |
|
|
On Dec 20, 9:25 pm, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___> wrote:
"Simpson" <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:U%Daj.439$El5.230@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
Christians pick and choose what they want to believe, as it suits them.
Even the "fundamentalists," who claim the Bible is a literal history,
selectively ignore the parts they don't want to believe.
Not that it matters what a bunch of violent, bigoted wackos think about a
work of fiction.
The Christians would like to get rid of the Old Testament completely
and start with the birth of Christ. However, they are stuck with it
because, without it, there would have been no promise of a second
coming and Christ would have been just another trouble making Jew to
the Romans,
The Old Testament is an awful tome of everything evil and G-d himself
is a demon
Read Artocities in the Bible for just a few of the samples
http://thetruth.hypermart.net/bible/atrocities.htm
NO. the Christians are out of luck wishing that the God of the Old
Testament was dead. They tried before and failed.
Whence arose all the horrid assassinations of whole nations of men,
women and infants, with which the Bible is filled; and the bloody
persecutions, and tortures unto death, and religious wars, that since
that time have laid Europe in blood and ashes; whence arose they, but
the impious thing called religion and this monstrous belief that God
has spoken to man?
--Cardiff
Christianity is a monstrous fraud and delusion, that has desolated the
earth and filled the spirit world with demons. . . . there is not a
tenet, dogma, doctrine, ceremony, form or prayer, fast or feast, title
of deity, form of church government, official rank or religious
observance of any kind, that is not identical with some prototype to
be found in one or more of the more ancient religious systems. . . .
no such person, man, or God, as Jesus Christ, had anything to do with
establishing the religion that has been taught in his name. . . . To
get rid of the damning fact that there is no historical basis for
their theological fictions, the Christian priesthood have been guilty
of the heinous crime of destroying nearly all traces of the concurrent
history of the first two centuries of the Christian era. What little
of it they have permitted to come down to us, they have so altered and
changed, as to destroy its historical value.
--JM Roberts, Esq.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Raymond" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 09:31:17 PM |
|
|
On Dec 20, 10:12=EF=BF=BDpm, Raymond <Bluerhy...@aol.com> wrote:
On Dec 20, 9:25 pm, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___> wrote:
"Simpson" <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:U%Daj.439$El5.230@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the N=
ew
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue=
?
Christians pick and choose what they want to believe, as it suits them.
Even the "fundamentalists," who claim the Bible is a literal history,
selectively ignore the parts they don't want to believe.
Not that it matters what a bunch of violent, bigoted wackos think about =
a
work of fiction.
The Christians would like to get rid of the Old Testament completely
and start with the birth of Christ. However, they are stuck with it
because, without it, there would have been no promise of a second
coming and Christ would have been just another trouble making Jew to
the Romans,
The Old Testament is an awful tome of everything evil and G-d himself
is a demon
Read Artocities in the Bible for just a few of the sampleshttp://thetruth.=
hypermart.net/bible/atrocities.htm
NO. the Christians are out of luck wishing that the God of the Old
Testament was dead. They tried before and failed.
Whence arose all the horrid assassinations of whole nations of men,
women and infants, with which the Bible is filled; and the bloody
persecutions, and tortures unto death, and religious wars, that since
that time have laid Europe in blood and ashes; whence arose they, but
the impious thing called religion and this monstrous belief that God
has spoken to man?
--Cardiff
Christianity is a monstrous fraud and delusion, that has desolated the
earth and filled the spirit world with demons. . . . there is not a
tenet, dogma, doctrine, ceremony, form or prayer, fast or feast, title
of deity, form of church government, official rank or religious
observance of any kind, that is not identical with some prototype to
be found in one or more of the more ancient religious systems. . . .
no such person, man, or God, as Jesus Christ, had anything to do with
establishing the religion that has been taught in his name. . . . To
get rid of the damning fact that there is no historical basis for
their theological fictions, the Christian priesthood have been guilty
of the heinous crime of destroying nearly all traces of the concurrent
history of the first two centuries of the Christian era. What little
of it they have permitted to come down to us, they have so altered and
changed, as to destroy its historical value.
--JM Roberts, Esq.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Page II
The Christians borrowed from the Jews and even from a religion much
older than Christianity - that being Zoroasterism, a much more
reasonable religion. For those that are new to the word, I suggest you
read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrian
Zoroastrianism is uniquely important in the history of religion
because of its possible formative links to both Western and Eastern
religious traditions. As "the oldest of the revealed creedal
religions", Zoroastrianism "probably had more influence on mankind
directly or indirectly than any other faith".
I am not trying to convert anyone to anything. I am simply attempting
to show where Christians got most of their Santa Claus plot.
Today there are about a million and a half members in the
Zoroastrian community. In the US most are located in colleges and
universities and practice their religion which is dedicated to a
three-fold path which consists of , "Good thoughts, good words and
good deeds."
"Christians are obligated to learn not about Jews but from Jews, not
out of fear of Jews, but out of the need to discover and appreciate
the shape of Christianity's own heritage through a deeper knowledge
and appreciation of the gift that God has given-and keeps giving-to
the Jews.
=2E
"Learning about Judaism from Jews as a way of gaining in wisdom
means learning as well an unaccustomed humility. If Christians can
manage such small steps, they will begin to learn what repentance
truly means."
=2E
Bertrand Russell said: "I am firmly convinced that religions do harm
as I am that they are untrue. The question of the truth of a religion
is one thing, but the question of its usefulness is another."
See; Why I Am Not A Christian
by Bertrand Russell
http://users.drew.edu/~jlenz/whynot.html
We can be whatever we want to be in faith, or out of faith. But we
should be permitted to make our own choice as Russell did after much
investigation and private thought.
Can't we do that without pissing off people who don't want to be
bothered by evangelists. Many believe that evangelism is all about
propaganda... and has caused serious problems throughout history
since its inception, especially in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
And, I am reminded of the Thirty Year War in Europe (1618-1648)
between the Protestants and Catholics that caused so much devastation
that Europe did not recover for over one hundred years and the
divisions can still be felt.
Religion is based . . . mainly upon fear . . . fear of the mysterious,
fear of defeat, fear of death. Fear is the parent of cruelty, and
therefore it is no wonder if cruelty and religion have gone hand in
hand . . . . My own view on religion is that of Lucretius. I regard it
as a disease born of fear and as a source of untold misery to the
human race.
--Bertrand Russell
Maybe Russell is right.
Let us prey
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Henry Von Sweitzenheimer" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 11:30:08 AM |
|
|
What Me Worry? wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:U%Daj.439$El5.230@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
Christians pick and choose what they want to believe, as it suits them.
Even the "fundamentalists," who claim the Bible is a literal history,
selectively ignore the parts they don't want to believe.
Not that it matters what a bunch of violent, bigoted wackos think about a
work of fiction.
SOUNDS LIKE THE KRAPAN, DOESN'T IT?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 11:04:57 PM |
|
|
On Dec 20, 4:44=A0pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
I probably don't fit your idea of what a Christian might be.. but for
what it's worth the OT is not what Christianity is about anyway. The
OT - besides being more of a history - concerns itself with promising
a Messiah.
The New Testament delivered that Messiah.
Merry Christmas, comrade.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ramona" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 10:57:37 AM |
|
|
On Dec 21, 12:04 am, wrote:
On Dec 20, 4:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
I probably don't fit your idea of what a Christian might be.. but for
what it's worth the OT is not what Christianity is about anyway. The
OT - besides being more of a history - concerns itself with promising
a Messiah.
The New Testament delivered that Messiah.
How do you see that promise being fulfilled?
Genesis 49:1 This requires that Jesus FATHER be from the tribe of
Judah. When was the Father birthed into the family of Judah? Or do
you believe Joseph is Jesus BIOLOGICAL father....adoption doesn't
count.
Isaiah 11:12 Have all the Jews gathered in Israel? Nope, so Jesus
failed in this department as well.
You can go here for more information:
http://jewsforjudaism.com/jews-jesus/jews-jesus-index.html
If Jesus fails in any requirement, he fails as Messiah which he
clearly has done based on scripture.
Ramona
Merry Christmas, comrade.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 01:01:14 PM |
|
|
On Dec 21, 8:57=A0am, Ramona <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 21, 12:04 am, wrote:
On Dec 20, 4:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the N=
ew
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue=
?
I probably don't fit your idea of what a Christian might be.. but for
what it's worth the OT is not what Christianity is about anyway. The
OT - besides being more of a history - concerns itself with promising
a Messiah.
The New Testament delivered that Messiah.
How do you see that promise being fulfilled?
Genesis 49:1 This requires that Jesus FATHER be from the tribe of
Judah. =A0When was the Father birthed into the family of Judah? =A0Or do
you believe Joseph is Jesus BIOLOGICAL father....adoption doesn't
count.
Isaiah 11:12 =A0Have all the Jews gathered in Israel? =A0Nope, so Jesus
failed in this department as well.
Oh lordee, help me...
I am no Pharasee sitting in shool to debate theology..
And I certainly have zippo claim to religious metaphysical insight..
We will all find out... bye and bye.
I just stated the obvious and very real fact:
"Sure.. just as I said; pre-Messiah.. and post-Messiah.. the big
difference. OT adherents are still waiting.. NT believers are
practicing."
PS: Your argument only has bearing with those believing verbatim in
the authority of the OT... but I was kind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 01:07:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:01:14 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Dec 21, 8:57 am, Ramona <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 21, 12:04 am, wrote:
On Dec 20, 4:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
I probably don't fit your idea of what a Christian might be.. but for
what it's worth the OT is not what Christianity is about anyway. The
OT - besides being more of a history - concerns itself with promising
a Messiah.
The New Testament delivered that Messiah.
How do you see that promise being fulfilled?
Genesis 49:1 This requires that Jesus FATHER be from the tribe of
Judah. When was the Father birthed into the family of Judah? Or do
you believe Joseph is Jesus BIOLOGICAL father....adoption doesn't
count.
Isaiah 11:12 Have all the Jews gathered in Israel? Nope, so Jesus
failed in this department as well.
Oh lordee, help me...
I am no Pharasee sitting in shool to debate theology..
And I certainly have zippo claim to religious metaphysical insight..
We will all find out... bye and bye.
I just stated the obvious and very real fact:
"Sure.. just as I said; pre-Messiah.. and post-Messiah.. the big
difference. OT adherents are still waiting.. NT believers are
practicing."
What "real fact", brainwashed moron who is too stupid to understand
the real world beyond his religion?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "skyeyes" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 11:05:14 AM |
|
|
On Dec 20, 5:44=A0pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
Why is this posted to alt.atheism?
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 11:25:55 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:05:14 -0800 (PST), in alt.atheism
skyeyes <skyeyes@dakotacom.net> wrote in
<046c74f0-2564-4fc4-923a-e6322aa36dbc@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>:
On Dec 20, 5:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
Why is this posted to alt.atheism?
Because there's a small group of so-called Christians who are incapable
of behaving like civilized human beings. It's as if they want to mock
the Christianity that they claim to adhere to.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
22 Dec 2007 07:27:30 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:25:55 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:05:14 -0800 (PST), in alt.atheism
skyeyes <skyeyes@dakotacom.net> wrote in
<046c74f0-2564-4fc4-923a-e6322aa36dbc@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>:
On Dec 20, 5:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
Why is this posted to alt.atheism?
Because there's a small group of so-called Christians who are incapable
of behaving like civilized human beings. It's as if they want to mock
the Christianity that they claim to adhere to.
You need the help.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "walksalone" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 02:12:54 PM |
|
|
skyeyes <> news:046c74f0-2564-4fc4-923a-
e6322aa36dbc@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com @ & follow
ups set to alt.atheism
On Dec 20, 5:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
Why is this posted to alt.atheism?
Because someone wants to start the *****?
But in the xian newsgroups, the question is valid.
Don't blame me, you just had to ask.
walksalone who is going back to sleep now.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Zigler" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 07:47:43 PM |
|
|
On Dec 20, 6:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
As many opinions as their are "Christians", I would imagine....
It's generally the same old circular reasoning, in my experience....
However, any rationale being would end up with one of two
possibilities, only:
1. God changed his/her/its mind on fundamental moral, ethical and
social issues, such as slavery, which was given the green flag in
Leviticus, just so long as the slaves were acquired from neighboring
nations...
Well, this "God" is absolute rubbish. And insane. Talk about a "flip
flopper". So much for the "Alpha and Omega"--the same "God" from its
origin to eternity....
2. (The common Christian explanation, paraphrased) Yes, the Old
Testament is word of God, bla bla bla, but the "laws" changed with
Bejebus, so, basically, the various churches, sects and individuals
are left to interpret for themselves those parts to be taken as
relevant and literal, and those, such as slavery, which are to be
viewed as "historic" and no longer applicable, bla bla.
3. Well, I lied. There is a third possible scenario:
The Old Testament, as well as the entire Bible... and EVERY OTHER BOOK
EVER WRITTEN, is the WORD OF MAN (People)... sometimes, perhaps,
directly inspired by God, other times, obviously not. And every
individual will arrive at his own interpretation anyway, whether
influenced by one religious sect or another or not, and in the end--to
paraphrase fricken Mike Huckleberry himself, what the hell good are
all the endless debates on interpretations and doctrine and dogma and
such complex philosophical and theological issues until we can all get
the basics right, like "love thy neighbor as thyself", and "whatsoever
you do unto the least of my brothers, you do unto me".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "V" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 10:13:00 PM |
|
|
On Dec 20, 7:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
I don't think they do give the OT as much weight as the NT.
We can ask the question Would the 'ideal' of a perfect, all loving God
approve of the Hebrew and Christian God Yahweh?
No, the ideal of God would not approve of God if the old testament is
a true accounting of Yahweh. The evidence shows that the God of the
monotheists as written in the bible is a man made story, whether it is
the story of Jesus or the God Yahweh of the Hebrews.
I write this after being a Catholic for 50+ years. What caused my
change in heart about God? Was it God's refusal to answer a self
centered prayer...No. Was it all the evil in the world...No. My change
in heart with my belief in God came from 'real study' of the dogma and
the books claimed to be the written words of God with a desire to get
closer to God. But, the more I studied, the further from God my
studies took me. But this is only a by product of the study of truth,
for if the study leads to a certain direction one must follow it, if
one is truth based. And if one is not truth based one makes up fantasy
and excuses and lives a delusional life.
If we look at logical and philosophical arguments for God they add up
to zero as each one of these arguments can be argued for or against
God
Ontological Argument +
Ontological Argument (--)
Cosmological Argument +
Cosmological Argument (--)
Teleological Argument +
Teleological Argument (--)
-----------------------------------------
Total = ZERO
As such, we need to look deeper into what the various religions of the
monotheist say to find the truth. There are four books claiming to be
the word of God. they are the Old Testament, New Testament, Qur'an and
the Book of Mormon. (OT, NT, Q and BOM) All these books conflict, yet
all claim to be the perfect word of God? Why doesn't God make clear
which one of these books to follow so there is no misunderstanding?
After all, a mistake in direction yield everlasting torture in hell?
Since God wont answer, we will have to answer for God by asking some
questions to get at the truth that God was invented by man. In short
we will judge God by the ideals of God. Then we can see clearly these
words of God were not written by an all perfect and all loving, all
good God but were just written by men claiming to be God.
Some religious advocates say it is presumptuous of anyone to 'judge'
God. But, such persons also judge God when they say God is good? In
order to judge something good it must still be judged? From my
studies, I have judged God as a creation or fantasy of man's mind and
a God that would refuse to tell the direction for a person to take and
then take joy in torturing that person for a mistake that the person
could not avoid is definitely bad.
God was no always so silent with direction. If we go back to the OT we
can see God communicated extensively with the Hebrews. God directed
them specifically with how to design and build things and how to
worship him through burnt offerings and penance. God was very detailed
with his directions about unclean women during menses and how the
Hebrews should keep their slaves. All quotes courtesy of http://www.evilbible.com/
(BTW, they banned me from their forums...so much for freethinkers.)
"When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that
the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the
slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the
slave is his own property." Exodus 21:20-21
God approving of slavery? God not approving of the Egyptians keeping
slaves yet is OK for the Hebrews to keep slaves? Again not a perfect
God. If we read further we will see God very bigoted and condemning of
all other nationalities except his chosen people the Hebrews. What
makes the world think such a bigoted God would accept them when God
had such hatred for others he supposedly created?
If we go to more modern times and the Christian dogma where God
offered his son to be tortured and killed in order for God to forgive
our sins? What do we do when we forgive another? Do we kill our son or
daughter or just forgive? How much more a perfect God could have just
forgiven us without killing his son? But God seemed to emphasize the
killing children in his words to his faithful as we can see in these
OT quotes.
"Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, "Follow him through the
city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy;
have no pity! Kill them all - old and young, girls and women and
little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your
task right here at the Temple." So they began by killing the seventy
leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards
with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the
city and did as they were told." Ezekiel 9:5-7
"The glory of Israel will fly away like a bird, for your children will
die at birth or perish in the womb or never even be conceived. Even
if your children do survive to grow up, I will take them from you. It
will be a terrible day when I turn away and leave you alone. I have
watched Israel become as beautiful and pleasant as Tyre. But now
Israel will bring out her children to be slaughtered." O LORD, what
should I request for your people? I will ask for wombs that don't
give birth and breasts that give no milk. The LORD says, "All their
wickedness began at Gilgal; there I began to hate them. I will drive
them from my land because of their evil actions. I will love them no
more because all their leaders are rebels. The people of Israel are
stricken. Their roots are dried up; they will bear no more fruit.
And if they give birth, I will slaughter their beloved children."
Hosea 9:11-16
"Suppose a man has a stubborn, rebellious son who will not obey his
father or mother, even though they discipline him. In such cases, the
father and mother must take the son before the leaders of the town.
They must declare: 'This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious and
refuses to obey. He is a worthless drunkard.' Then all the men of the
town must stone him to death. In this way, you will cleanse this evil
from among you, and all Israel will hear about it and be afraid."
Deuteronomy 21:18-21
What happened to this vocal God that seemed to die with the authors
of the Old Testament, for no one ever hears a peep from God? Did God
die with the writers? BTW, if God was a perfect designer, should he
have not made women 'unclean' and not have menses and that way God
could have saved some breath and cut his 600+ commandants to the
Hebrew down by one? See: http://members.ozemail.com.au/~adamgosp/otcomm.htm
God even commanded the people how to bake bread, (with human
excrement) discriminate against the handicapped, kill the faithful of
other religions and how much money to pay to rape young women.
Each day prepare your bread as you would barley cakes. While all the
people are watching, bake it over a fire using dried human dung as
fuel and then eat the bread. For this is what the LORD says: "Israel
will eat defiled bread in the Gentile lands, where I will banish
them!" Then I said, "O Sovereign LORD, must I be defiled by using
human dung? For I have never been defiled before. From the time I was
a child until now I have never eaten any animal that died of sickness
or that I found dead. And I have never eaten any of the animals that
our laws forbid." "All right," the LORD said. "You may bake your
bread with cow dung instead of human dung." Ezekiel 4:12-15
"No one whose testicles have been crushed or whose penis has been cut
off may be admitted into the community of the Lord." Deuteronomy
23:2
"If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not
engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he
must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never
be allowed to divorce her." Deuteronomy 22:28-29
"If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved
wife, or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other
gods, whom you and your fathers have not known, gods of any other
nations, near at hand or far away, from one end of the earth to the
other: do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon
him, to spare or shield him, but kill him. Your hand shall be the
first raised to slay him; the rest of the people shall join in with
you. You shall stone him to death, because he sought to lead you
astray from the Lord, your God, who brought you out of the land of
Egypt, that place of slavery. And all Israel, hearing of this, shall
fear and never do such evil as this in your midst." Deuteronomy
13:7-12
Yes, the writers for God's word will be able to show you how the God
they claim to be perfect is not perfect and just an extension of
imperfect man's mind. If you read the bible with an open mind that is
logical and rational you will see this for yourself. It is only when
we make excuses for God that God is relieved from being a true God.
In the OT it says God is a 'jealous God' and requires worship.
"You shall not carve idols for yourselves in the shape of anything in
the sky above or on the earth below or in the waters beneath the
earth; you shall not bow down before them or worship them. For I, the
Lord, your God, am a jealous God, inflicting punishment for their
father's wickedness on the children of those who hate me, down to the
third and fourth generation" Exodus 20:4-5
Once someone 'requires' anything outside themselves the persons peace
will be disturbed. Yet the popular belief that God is perfect...the
two (jealousy and perfection) don't go together. In addition such a
God would not pass the peace test. If the God did not receive worship
the God's peace would be disturbed from having demands and not getting
those demands fulfilled. Then the God would have its peace disturbed
even further by torturing the person for everlasting eternity since
that person did not provide the worship the God demanded. Does all
this smack of a perfect being, perfectly at peace or just man
impersonating God
See:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=133.0
You see, many people do with religion and their religious fixations
the same as the compulsive gambler does with their fantasy.
Excerpt From: Gamblers Anonymous pamphlet "The dream world of a
compulsive gambler." A lot of time is spent creating images of great
and wonderful things they are going to do as soon as they make "the
big win."... No one can convince them that their great schemes will
not come true. They believe they will, for without this dream world,
life for them would not be tolerable.
The truth is that which does not change. Man made religion is always
changing. This phenomena of putting a spin on truth goes back to the
earliest formations of the church when it was voted on by presumptuous
individuals as to how to describe God and the trinity. You see it was
all voted on and the proponent that had the 'best spin' on it got the
credit for Nicene Creed. But in reality no one has a clew about this
subject. Want a modern day example of such spiritual sickness, spin
and lies?
"Roman Catholic Church Considers Abolishing Limbo Theory" A commission
that met at the Vatican last week is expected to recommend to Pope
Benedict XVI that the teaching of limbo be dropped. The Roman Catholic
Church may abolish the concept of limbo - the place some Catholics
believe the spirit of babies go if they die before being baptized
Snip from: http://www.christianpost.com/article/20051209/22492.htm
But it is impossible to have a rational discussion with most religious
devotees when they insist on irrationality as their first line of
defense. We are rational beings, logical beings, yet belief in God can
only come about through irrational, non logical thought. Would a God
that created rational, logical beings require such beings to follow
irrational fantasy in order to believe in him? An example? While
discussing fossils and ancient coal with a Christian he claimed that
fossils and ancient coal are not really old and 'planted by the devil'
to trick people from believing in God? this also recalls the book of
Enoch, a book that was left out of the bible by the powers that
decided what went into it when it was first formed. This book
described many fantastic claims about how Eve was tricked by the devil
masquerading as an angel. Would God create such subterfuge as planted
fake fossils in order to trick his loved ones only to condom them to
burning and torture for all eternity in hell because they cannot find
out the rational and logical truth? Yes, such an unjust God would if
your God is that of a sickly, delusional, religious devotee that
believe is such fantasy.
Even when we discuss the story of Jesus, is it rational for God to
have to kill his only begotten son in order to forgive us? What do we
do when we forgive another? Do we kill our mother, son or daughter in
order to forgive another person? Yet, Christians cling to this
fantasy. Jesus was never born on December 25 and in fact there is no
evidence Jesus was ever born at all. Christians adopted Christmas from
the pagan December 25 holiday in order to promote their own agenda,
just as they did with Halloween.
For further discussion of the Jesus myth see:
http://www.vexen.co.uk/books/jesusmysteries.html
http://www.atheists.org/christianity/myth.html
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/fabrication.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_as_myth
http://home.ca.inter.net/~oblio/home.htm
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/7748/106446
http://www.abc.net.au/religion/stories/s1517078.htm
http://www.atheist-community.org/library/articles/read.php?id=700
http://www.christianorigins.com/goguel/
http://www.bede.org.uk/price1.htm
http://www.objectivethought.com/atheism/jesusmyth.html
http://pages.ca.inter.net/~oblio/jesus.html
http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/historicus/jesus.html
http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/jesusmyth.htm
http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/origins_of_christianity.htm
"Theology is a superstition - Humanity is a religion" - Robert G.
Ingersol
BTW, what does work if all religion is created man made fantasy?
Just dropping God is not the answer for inner peace as this forum is
proof positive of that. With the multitude of spiritually sick
individuals here we can see humans need something in their life to
guide them to peace...at least it is so within our modern society of
sick complexities Neil.
See my previous discussion of this topic of what does work:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=4.0
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
.
|
|
|
| User: "cactus" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 12:11:30 AM |
|
|
V wrote:
On Dec 20, 7:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
I don't think they do give the OT as much weight as the NT.
We can ask the question Would the 'ideal' of a perfect, all loving God
approve of the Hebrew and Christian God Yahweh?
No, the ideal of God would not approve of God if the old testament is
a true accounting of Yahweh. The evidence shows that the God of the
monotheists as written in the bible is a man made story, whether it is
the story of Jesus or the God Yahweh of the Hebrews.
I write this after being a Catholic for 50+ years. What caused my
change in heart about God? Was it God's refusal to answer a self
centered prayer...No. Was it all the evil in the world...No. My change
in heart with my belief in God came from 'real study' of the dogma and
the books claimed to be the written words of God with a desire to get
closer to God. But, the more I studied, the further from God my
studies took me. But this is only a by product of the study of truth,
for if the study leads to a certain direction one must follow it, if
one is truth based. And if one is not truth based one makes up fantasy
and excuses and lives a delusional life.
If we look at logical and philosophical arguments for God they add up
to zero as each one of these arguments can be argued for or against
God
Ontological Argument +
Ontological Argument (--)
Cosmological Argument +
Cosmological Argument (--)
Teleological Argument +
Teleological Argument (--)
-----------------------------------------
Total = ZERO
As such, we need to look deeper into what the various religions of the
monotheist say to find the truth. There are four books claiming to be
the word of God. they are the Old Testament, New Testament, Qur'an and
the Book of Mormon. (OT, NT, Q and BOM) All these books conflict, yet
all claim to be the perfect word of God? Why doesn't God make clear
which one of these books to follow so there is no misunderstanding?
After all, a mistake in direction yield everlasting torture in hell?
Since God wont answer, we will have to answer for God by asking some
questions to get at the truth that God was invented by man. In short
we will judge God by the ideals of God. Then we can see clearly these
words of God were not written by an all perfect and all loving, all
good God but were just written by men claiming to be God.
Some religious advocates say it is presumptuous of anyone to 'judge'
God. But, such persons also judge God when they say God is good? In
order to judge something good it must still be judged? From my
studies, I have judged God as a creation or fantasy of man's mind and
a God that would refuse to tell the direction for a person to take and
then take joy in torturing that person for a mistake that the person
could not avoid is definitely bad.
God was no always so silent with direction. If we go back to the OT we
can see God communicated extensively with the Hebrews. God directed
them specifically with how to design and build things and how to
worship him through burnt offerings and penance. God was very detailed
with his directions about unclean women during menses and how the
Hebrews should keep their slaves. All quotes courtesy of http://www.evilbible.com/
(BTW, they banned me from their forums...so much for freethinkers.)
"When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that
the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the
slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the
slave is his own property." Exodus 21:20-21
God approving of slavery? God not approving of the Egyptians keeping
slaves yet is OK for the Hebrews to keep slaves? Again not a perfect
God. If we read further we will see God very bigoted and condemning of
all other nationalities except his chosen people the Hebrews. What
makes the world think such a bigoted God would accept them when God
had such hatred for others he supposedly created?
If we go to more modern times and the Christian dogma where God
offered his son to be tortured and killed in order for God to forgive
our sins? What do we do when we forgive another? Do we kill our son or
daughter or just forgive? How much more a perfect God could have just
forgiven us without killing his son? But God seemed to emphasize the
killing children in his words to his faithful as we can see in these
OT quotes.
"Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, "Follow him through the
city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy;
have no pity! Kill them all - old and young, girls and women and
little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your
task right here at the Temple." So they began by killing the seventy
leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards
with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the
city and did as they were told." Ezekiel 9:5-7
"The glory of Israel will fly away like a bird, for your children will
die at birth or perish in the womb or never even be conceived. Even
if your children do survive to grow up, I will take them from you. It
will be a terrible day when I turn away and leave you alone. I have
watched Israel become as beautiful and pleasant as Tyre. But now
Israel will bring out her children to be slaughtered." O LORD, what
should I request for your people? I will ask for wombs that don't
give birth and breasts that give no milk. The LORD says, "All their
wickedness began at Gilgal; there I began to hate them. I will drive
them from my land because of their evil actions. I will love them no
more because all their leaders are rebels. The people of Israel are
stricken. Their roots are dried up; they will bear no more fruit.
And if they give birth, I will slaughter their beloved children."
Hosea 9:11-16
"Suppose a man has a stubborn, rebellious son who will not obey his
father or mother, even though they discipline him. In such cases, the
father and mother must take the son before the leaders of the town.
They must declare: 'This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious and
refuses to obey. He is a worthless drunkard.' Then all the men of the
town must stone him to death. In this way, you will cleanse this evil
from among you, and all Israel will hear about it and be afraid."
Deuteronomy 21:18-21
What happened to this vocal God that seemed to die with the authors
of the Old Testament, for no one ever hears a peep from God? Did God
die with the writers? BTW, if God was a perfect designer, should he
have not made women 'unclean' and not have menses and that way God
could have saved some breath and cut his 600+ commandants to the
Hebrew down by one? See: http://members.ozemail.com.au/~adamgosp/otcomm.htm
God even commanded the people how to bake bread, (with human
excrement) discriminate against the handicapped, kill the faithful of
other religions and how much money to pay to rape young women.
Each day prepare your bread as you would barley cakes. While all the
people are watching, bake it over a fire using dried human dung as
fuel and then eat the bread. For this is what the LORD says: "Israel
will eat defiled bread in the Gentile lands, where I will banish
them!" Then I said, "O Sovereign LORD, must I be defiled by using
human dung? For I have never been defiled before. From the time I was
a child until now I have never eaten any animal that died of sickness
or that I found dead. And I have never eaten any of the animals that
our laws forbid." "All right," the LORD said. "You may bake your
bread with cow dung instead of human dung." Ezekiel 4:12-15
"No one whose testicles have been crushed or whose penis has been cut
off may be admitted into the community of the Lord." Deuteronomy
23:2
"If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not
engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he
must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never
be allowed to divorce her." Deuteronomy 22:28-29
"If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved
wife, or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other
gods, whom you and your fathers have not known, gods of any other
nations, near at hand or far away, from one end of the earth to the
other: do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon
him, to spare or shield him, but kill him. Your hand shall be the
first raised to slay him; the rest of the people shall join in with
you. You shall stone him to death, because he sought to lead you
astray from the Lord, your God, who brought you out of the land of
Egypt, that place of slavery. And all Israel, hearing of this, shall
fear and never do such evil as this in your midst." Deuteronomy
13:7-12
Yes, the writers for God's word will be able to show you how the God
they claim to be perfect is not perfect and just an extension of
imperfect man's mind. If you read the bible with an open mind that is
logical and rational you will see this for yourself. It is only when
we make excuses for God that God is relieved from being a true God.
In the OT it says God is a 'jealous God' and requires worship.
"You shall not carve idols for yourselves in the shape of anything in
the sky above or on the earth below or in the waters beneath the
earth; you shall not bow down before them or worship them. For I, the
Lord, your God, am a jealous God, inflicting punishment for their
father's wickedness on the children of those who hate me, down to the
third and fourth generation" Exodus 20:4-5
Once someone 'requires' anything outside themselves the persons peace
will be disturbed. Yet the popular belief that God is perfect...the
two (jealousy and perfection) don't go together. In addition such a
God would not pass the peace test. If the God did not receive worship
the God's peace would be disturbed from having demands and not getting
those demands fulfilled. Then the God would have its peace disturbed
even further by torturing the person for everlasting eternity since
that person did not provide the worship the God demanded. Does all
this smack of a perfect being, perfectly at peace or just man
impersonating God
See:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=133.0
You see, many people do with religion and their religious fixations
the same as the compulsive gambler does with their fantasy.
Excerpt From: Gamblers Anonymous pamphlet "The dream world of a
compulsive gambler." A lot of time is spent creating images of great
and wonderful things they are going to do as soon as they make "the
big win."... No one can convince them that their great schemes will
not come true. They believe they will, for without this dream world,
life for them would not be tolerable.
The truth is that which does not change. Man made religion is always
changing. This phenomena of putting a spin on truth goes back to the
earliest formations of the church when it was voted on by presumptuous
individuals as to how to describe God and the trinity. You see it was
all voted on and the proponent that had the 'best spin' on it got the
credit for Nicene Creed. But in reality no one has a clew about this
subject. Want a modern day example of such spiritual sickness, spin
and lies?
"Roman Catholic Church Considers Abolishing Limbo Theory" A commission
that met at the Vatican last week is expected to recommend to Pope
Benedict XVI that the teaching of limbo be dropped. The Roman Catholic
Church may abolish the concept of limbo - the place some Catholics
believe the spirit of babies go if they die before being baptized
Snip from: http://www.christianpost.com/article/20051209/22492.htm
But it is impossible to have a rational discussion with most religious
devotees when they insist on irrationality as their first line of
defense. We are rational beings, logical beings, yet belief in God can
only come about through irrational, non logical thought. Would a God
that created rational, logical beings require such beings to follow
irrational fantasy in order to believe in him? An example? While
discussing fossils and ancient coal with a Christian he claimed that
fossils and ancient coal are not really old and 'planted by the devil'
to trick people from believing in God? this also recalls the book of
Enoch, a book that was left out of the bible by the powers that
decided what went into it when it was first formed. This book
described many fantastic claims about how Eve was tricked by the devil
masquerading as an angel. Would God create such subterfuge as planted
fake fossils in order to trick his loved ones only to condom them to
burning and torture for all eternity in hell because they cannot find
out the rational and logical truth? Yes, such an unjust God would if
your God is that of a sickly, delusional, religious devotee that
believe is such fantasy.
Even when we discuss the story of Jesus, is it rational for God to
have to kill his only begotten son in order to forgive us? What do we
do when we forgive another? Do we kill our mother, son or daughter in
order to forgive another person? Yet, Christians cling to this
fantasy. Jesus was never born on December 25 and in fact there is no
evidence Jesus was ever born at all. Christians adopted Christmas from
the pagan December 25 holiday in order to promote their own agenda,
just as they did with Halloween.
For further discussion of the Jesus myth see:
http://www.vexen.co.uk/books/jesusmysteries.html
http://www.atheists.org/christianity/myth.html
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/fabrication.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_as_myth
http://home.ca.inter.net/~oblio/home.htm
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/7748/106446
http://www.abc.net.au/religion/stories/s1517078.htm
http://www.atheist-community.org/library/articles/read.php?id=700
http://www.christianorigins.com/goguel/
http://www.bede.org.uk/price1.htm
http://www.objectivethought.com/atheism/jesusmyth.html
http://pages.ca.inter.net/~oblio/jesus.html
http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/historicus/jesus.html
http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/jesusmyth.htm
http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/origins_of_christianity.htm
"Theology is a superstition - Humanity is a religion" - Robert G.
Ingersol
BTW, what does work if all religion is created man made fantasy?
Just dropping God is not the answer for inner peace as this forum is
proof positive of that. With the multitude of spiritually sick
individuals here we can see humans need something in their life to
guide them to peace...at least it is so within our modern society of
sick complexities Neil.
See my previous discussion of this topic of what does work:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=4.0
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
No they don't. They consider the commandments to have been superseded by
the actions of Jesus of Nazareth.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kickin Ass and Takin Names" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 06:53:35 PM |
|
|
On Dec 20, 7:44 pm, Simpson <2p...@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
Probably. After all, biblethumpers will believe anything.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 06:48:51 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
The New Testament is the follow-on of the prophesies of the Old Testament.
In the beginning, God created the universe, and mankind, and introduced himself
to his creation. Then he revealed that he would reveal himself as Messiah. Then
the messiah came 2000 years ago, and said "this is the new way".
So, the OT prophesies the coming of the messiah. And is treated as such in
Christian faith.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Feng" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 09:25:16 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
There is nothing wrong with the Old Testament, except how we
understand it.
Under the light of truth, according to the judgment of good and evil
based on the truth, there can be very good understandings about the
Old Testament.
.
|
|
|
| User: "What Me Worry?" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 10:01:21 PM |
|
|
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:n3bmm3penqg864h4t1mrn74gsugo6e7nhi@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
There is nothing wrong with the Old Testament, except how we
understand it.
Under the light of truth, according to the judgment of good and evil
based on the truth, there can be very good understandings about the
Old Testament.
Can you translate that for non-wackos?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Feng" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 10:30:05 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:01:21 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:n3bmm3penqg864h4t1mrn74gsugo6e7nhi@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
There is nothing wrong with the Old Testament, except how we
understand it.
Under the light of truth, according to the judgment of good and evil
based on the truth, there can be very good understandings about the
Old Testament.
Can you translate that for non-wackos?
No problem.
According to the judgment of common sense in life, anyone who asks you
to kill your own son for his pleasure is evil. When a god asks you to
kill your own son for his pleasure, it should be obvious to you that
such god is the Devil instead of God.
Now, if you can reach such conclusion while reading the Old Testament,
you will have graduated from the class of Old Testament to be ready to
receive higher understandings of the truth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "What Me Worry?" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 10:42:59 PM |
|
|
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:agfmm3dgbq9545i3d46i6um17fg8jbu9h6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:01:21 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:n3bmm3penqg864h4t1mrn74gsugo6e7nhi@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
There is nothing wrong with the Old Testament, except how we
understand it.
Under the light of truth, according to the judgment of good and evil
based on the truth, there can be very good understandings about the
Old Testament.
Can you translate that for non-wackos?
No problem.
According to the judgment of common sense in life, anyone who asks you
to kill your own son for his pleasure is evil. When a god asks you to
kill your own son for his pleasure, it should be obvious to you that
such god is the Devil instead of God.
This assertion presumes that flawed, sinning Man is capable of correct moral
judgement in the absence of a divinely-inspired standard. If true, then Man
would have no need for divine guidance.
Now, if you can reach such conclusion while reading the Old Testament,
you will have graduated from the class of Old Testament to be ready to
receive higher understandings of the truth.
Do you mean "the truth" or "the Truth?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Feng" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
20 Dec 2007 11:15:02 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:42:59 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:agfmm3dgbq9545i3d46i6um17fg8jbu9h6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:01:21 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:n3bmm3penqg864h4t1mrn74gsugo6e7nhi@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this issue?
There is nothing wrong with the Old Testament, except how we
understand it.
Under the light of truth, according to the judgment of good and evil
based on the truth, there can be very good understandings about the
Old Testament.
Can you translate that for non-wackos?
No problem.
According to the judgment of common sense in life, anyone who asks you
to kill your own son for his pleasure is evil. When a god asks you to
kill your own son for his pleasure, it should be obvious to you that
such god is the Devil instead of God.
This assertion presumes that flawed, sinning Man is capable of correct moral
judgement in the absence of a divinely-inspired standard. If true, then Man
would have no need for divine guidance.
That statement presumes the divinely-inspired standard is absent in
the human nature which is supposed to be a creation of God.
I will agree that sin does corrupt the human nature, but it should
also be obvious that the human nature does survive the corruption and
destruction of sin throughout the human history.
Could it be because the human nature does possess certain innate
knowledge about the truth?
I think so.
Now, if you can reach such conclusion while reading the Old Testament,
you will have graduated from the class of Old Testament to be ready to
receive higher understandings of the truth.
Do you mean "the truth" or "the Truth?"
I don't make that distinction since the human mind can not understand
the Truth without the truth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 12:03:24 AM |
|
|
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:oohmm318o113el189n4mdetjf60b7jdhus@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:42:59 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:agfmm3dgbq9545i3d46i6um17fg8jbu9h6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:01:21 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:n3bmm3penqg864h4t1mrn74gsugo6e7nhi@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the
New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this
issue?
There is nothing wrong with the Old Testament, except how we
understand it.
Under the light of truth, according to the judgment of good and evil
based on the truth, there can be very good understandings about the
Old Testament.
Can you translate that for non-wackos?
No problem.
According to the judgment of common sense in life, anyone who asks you
to kill your own son for his pleasure is evil. When a god asks you to
kill your own son for his pleasure, it should be obvious to you that
such god is the Devil instead of God.
This assertion presumes that flawed, sinning Man is capable of correct
moral
judgement in the absence of a divinely-inspired standard. If true, then
Man
would have no need for divine guidance.
That statement presumes the divinely-inspired standard is absent in
the human nature which is supposed to be a creation of God.
I will agree that sin does corrupt the human nature, but it should
also be obvious that the human nature does survive the corruption and
destruction of sin throughout the human history.
So, if common sense can be corrupted, then we're back where we started. How
do you determine what's "the light of truth" if common sense, which you use
as your yardstick, is corruptable?
Could it be because the human nature does possess certain innate
knowledge about the truth?
Irrelevant, even if it were true. You can't know the truth if your nature is
corruptable. If you had the truth, it would only be by accident.
I think so.
But, as you insist, your nature is corruptable. So why should we listen to
anything you have to say?
Now, if you can reach such conclusion while reading the Old Testament,
you will have graduated from the class of Old Testament to be ready to
receive higher understandings of the truth.
Do you mean "the truth" or "the Truth?"
I don't make that distinction since the human mind can not understand
the Truth without the truth.
How convenient.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Feng" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 01:21:29 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:03:24 -0600, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:oohmm318o113el189n4mdetjf60b7jdhus@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:42:59 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:agfmm3dgbq9545i3d46i6um17fg8jbu9h6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:01:21 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:n3bmm3penqg864h4t1mrn74gsugo6e7nhi@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the
New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this
issue?
There is nothing wrong with the Old Testament, except how we
understand it.
Under the light of truth, according to the judgment of good and evil
based on the truth, there can be very good understandings about the
Old Testament.
Can you translate that for non-wackos?
No problem.
According to the judgment of common sense in life, anyone who asks you
to kill your own son for his pleasure is evil. When a god asks you to
kill your own son for his pleasure, it should be obvious to you that
such god is the Devil instead of God.
This assertion presumes that flawed, sinning Man is capable of correct
moral
judgement in the absence of a divinely-inspired standard. If true, then
Man
would have no need for divine guidance.
That statement presumes the divinely-inspired standard is absent in
the human nature which is supposed to be a creation of God.
I will agree that sin does corrupt the human nature, but it should
also be obvious that the human nature does survive the corruption and
destruction of sin throughout the human history.
So, if common sense can be corrupted, then we're back where we started. How
do you determine what's "the light of truth" if common sense, which you use
as your yardstick, is corruptable?
The love in my heart and everyone's heart. That is the yardstick my
common sense is based on.
Could it be because the human nature does possess certain innate
knowledge about the truth?
Irrelevant, even if it were true. You can't know the truth if your nature is
corruptable. If you had the truth, it would only be by accident.
Thanks to Jesus Christ, that problem has already been solved. Anyone
who follows the teaching of Christ can always find the truth thorough
his Love.
I think so.
But, as you insist, your nature is corruptable. So why should we listen to
anything you have to say?
Just because the human nature is corruptible, doesn't mean the innate
knowledge of truth in our human nature is corruptible. The truth can
always be realized by searching and inquiring into our inner soul.
Now, if you can reach such conclusion while reading the Old Testament,
you will have graduated from the class of Old Testament to be ready to
receive higher understandings of the truth.
Do you mean "the truth" or "the Truth?"
I don't make that distinction since the human mind can not understand
the Truth without the truth.
How convenient.
No, it's simply a matter of fact according to what I have learned.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 02:51:58 AM |
|
|
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:hnomm3po2lpg2cf2j1uusj1cdss2omlttg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:03:24 -0600, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:oohmm318o113el189n4mdetjf60b7jdhus@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:42:59 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:agfmm3dgbq9545i3d46i6um17fg8jbu9h6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:01:21 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:n3bmm3penqg864h4t1mrn74gsugo6e7nhi@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the
New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this
issue?
There is nothing wrong with the Old Testament, except how we
understand it.
Under the light of truth, according to the judgment of good and evil
based on the truth, there can be very good understandings about the
Old Testament.
Can you translate that for non-wackos?
No problem.
According to the judgment of common sense in life, anyone who asks you
to kill your own son for his pleasure is evil. When a god asks you to
kill your own son for his pleasure, it should be obvious to you that
such god is the Devil instead of God.
This assertion presumes that flawed, sinning Man is capable of correct
moral
judgement in the absence of a divinely-inspired standard. If true, then
Man
would have no need for divine guidance.
That statement presumes the divinely-inspired standard is absent in
the human nature which is supposed to be a creation of God.
I will agree that sin does corrupt the human nature, but it should
also be obvious that the human nature does survive the corruption and
destruction of sin throughout the human history.
So, if common sense can be corrupted, then we're back where we started.
How
do you determine what's "the light of truth" if common sense, which you
use
as your yardstick, is corruptable?
The love in my heart and everyone's heart. That is the yardstick my
common sense is based on.
So the love in your heart is absolutely not corruptable?
How can you tell, since I presume you would use it to determine whether it's
corrupted or not. If the love in your heart is corrupted, it might very well
tell you that it's not. Then where would you be?
Could it be because the human nature does possess certain innate
knowledge about the truth?
Irrelevant, even if it were true. You can't know the truth if your nature
is
corruptable. If you had the truth, it would only be by accident.
Thanks to Jesus Christ, that problem has already been solved. Anyone
who follows the teaching of Christ can always find the truth thorough
his Love.
But that's according to your common sense, which you admit is corruptable.
Why would you believe it?
I think so.
But, as you insist, your nature is corruptable. So why should we listen to
anything you have to say?
Just because the human nature is corruptible, doesn't mean the innate
knowledge of truth in our human nature is corruptible.
Since your "innate knowledge of truth" is part of your human nature, which
you admit is corruptable, then clearly it can be corrupted just like the
rest of your human nature.
The truth can
always be realized by searching and inquiring into our inner soul.
But the search is carried out by a corruptable nature, which I assume would
result in falsehoods being mistaken for truth. And how did you determine
that your inner soul is accurate? Is there some objective test that can be
performed?
Now, if you can reach such conclusion while reading the Old Testament,
you will have graduated from the class of Old Testament to be ready to
receive higher understandings of the truth.
Do you mean "the truth" or "the Truth?"
I don't make that distinction since the human mind can not understand
the Truth without the truth.
How convenient.
No, it's simply a matter of fact according to what I have learned.
But you've learned it all through a corruptable human nature. You've just
arbitrarily decided that it's true.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Feng" |
|
| Title: Re: Do Christians accept the Old Testament as the word of God? |
21 Dec 2007 09:37:14 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:51:58 -0600, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:hnomm3po2lpg2cf2j1uusj1cdss2omlttg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:03:24 -0600, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:oohmm318o113el189n4mdetjf60b7jdhus@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:42:59 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:agfmm3dgbq9545i3d46i6um17fg8jbu9h6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:01:21 -0600, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:n3bmm3penqg864h4t1mrn74gsugo6e7nhi@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:52 -0800, Simpson <2part@epoxy.com> wrote:
Do Christians accept the teachings of the Old Testament?
Do Christians give the Old Testament every bit as much weight as the
New
Testament?
Is there a variety of opinions amongst Christians regarding this
issue?
| | | | | | | | | |