| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"kope2" |
| Date: |
09 Sep 2006 07:38:37 PM |
| Object: |
do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
i want you to watch this video then i will tell you why islam is
spreading so fast and how can you stop spreading of islam.
Amie Gallagher, nine, and her sister Ashlene, 12, are all-too-typical
children of modern Britain in some ways, daughters of a single-parent
household where the father is absent.
video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6872731311255429137&q=convert+to+islam
also read this very interesting.
http://www.hvk.org/articles/1103/75.html
now first you must ask yourself 3 questions.
1. why does islam is spreading so fast in last 3 decades?
2. how can you stop spreading of islam ?
3. what are the reason you cant stop spreading of islam ?
as you know those kids cant posiblely know that islam is truth but they
did like something about islam that missing in christianity/society,
there conversion has nothing to do that islam is true or not, majority
of humanbeing are dumbs for example in india people worship snakes,
monkeys, stones, elephants etc. and christians worship a god who became
man and died on peice of wood so he can save humen.
1. why does islam is spreading so fast in last 3 decades?
the reason islam is spreading so fast last 3 decades is because of
sextual immorality wide spread in christians's society like premarital
sex,infidelity, homosextualty, porn etc. because of woman nudity
everywhere man lost respect for women and because of man dont respect
women so women dont respect men.
so man and mostly women joining islam for new lifestyle
2. how can you stop/slowdown spreading of islam ?
simple ban bikini and other revealing clothing and porn.
3. what are the reason you cant stop spreading of islam ?
because you believe in freedom to wear bikini and watch porn, a freedom
could destroy you and your freedom.
please read in detail. http://www.xanga.com/hfghj23458654fgha
.
|
|
| User: "Vernon athere@athere" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
12 Sep 2006 08:39:50 AM |
|
|
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism" means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Out of hundreds of real scientists, (earning money by producing) I have
never come across an atheist scientist. They are outward enough to let it
be known that they are theists.
I guess if one is simple, it sort of leads to Atheism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Father Haskell" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
12 Sep 2006 06:49:56 PM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism" means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Interesting. It used to be the other way around:
http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/summer97/secular.html
"A few Christian fundamentalists attempt to convince us to
return to the Christianity of early America, yet according
to the historian, Robert T. Handy, 'No more than 10 percent--
probably less-- of Americans in 1800 were members of
congregations.'"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vernon athere@athere" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
12 Sep 2006 11:40:18 PM |
|
|
"Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1158104996.748347.320160@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism"
means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Interesting. It used to be the other way around:
http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/summer97/secular.html
"A few Christian fundamentalists attempt to convince us to
return to the Christianity of early America, yet according
to the historian, Robert T. Handy, 'No more than 10 percent--
probably less-- of Americans in 1800 were members of
congregations.'"
So, a dumb atheist (not surprising) writes a book.
So, a dumb atheist (not surprising) writes a book using terminology such as
congregation and not know the meaning at the time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Panama Floyd" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
12 Sep 2006 11:46:51 PM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
"Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1158104996.748347.320160@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism"
means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Interesting. It used to be the other way around:
http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/summer97/secular.html
"A few Christian fundamentalists attempt to convince us to
return to the Christianity of early America, yet according
to the historian, Robert T. Handy, 'No more than 10 percent--
probably less-- of Americans in 1800 were members of
congregations.'"
So, a dumb atheist (not surprising) writes a book.
So, a dumb atheist (not surprising) writes a book using terminology such as
congregation and not know the meaning at the time.
And much less surprising than a theist that actually *reads* a book.
Now there's something rare.
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man, Sep 06
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vernon athere@athere" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
13 Sep 2006 12:30:37 PM |
|
|
"Panama Floyd" <panamaflyd@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1158122810.983701.39580@e63g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1158104996.748347.320160@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism"
means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Interesting. It used to be the other way around:
http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/summer97/secular.html
"A few Christian fundamentalists attempt to convince us to
return to the Christianity of early America, yet according
to the historian, Robert T. Handy, 'No more than 10 percent--
probably less-- of Americans in 1800 were members of
congregations.'"
So, a dumb atheist (not surprising) writes a book.
So, a dumb atheist (not surprising) writes a book using terminology such
as
congregation and not know the meaning at the time.
And much less surprising than a theist that actually *reads* a book.
Now there's something rare.
You cited the book
You assumed you knew what a congregation meant.
Of all the real scientists I am directly acquainted with (hundreds), none
are atheists.
Get an education.
Bye Bye
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
15 Sep 2006 08:21:22 PM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
"Panama Floyd" <panamaflyd@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1158122810.983701.39580@e63g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1158104996.748347.320160@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism"
means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Interesting. It used to be the other way around:
http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/summer97/secular.html
"A few Christian fundamentalists attempt to convince us to
return to the Christianity of early America, yet according
to the historian, Robert T. Handy, 'No more than 10 percent--
probably less-- of Americans in 1800 were members of
congregations.'"
So, a dumb atheist (not surprising) writes a book.
So, a dumb atheist (not surprising) writes a book using terminology such
as
congregation and not know the meaning at the time.
And much less surprising than a theist that actually *reads* a book.
Now there's something rare.
You cited the book
Please consult the attributions. I cited nothing. It was a simple
drive-by insult.
You assumed you knew what a congregation meant.
You assume I care what a congregation meant. In *my* dictionary, it
says "a collection of superstitious morons commiting superstitious
idiocy."
Of all the real scientists I am directly acquainted with (hundreds), none
are atheists.
Lawn care workers and insect exterminators, while requiring limited
knowledge of botany and biology, do not count as "scientists"
Get an education.
Get a life.
Bye Bye
Don't let the door...oh, never mind. You know the rest.
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man Sept 06
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
13 Sep 2006 12:00:28 AM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism" means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to
lose the ability to read or understand the written word--something I
think you may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
It means neither moral nor immoral.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
No, it's higher than that, idiot.
Out of hundreds of real scientists, (earning money by producing) I have
never come across an atheist scientist. They are outward enough to let it
be known that they are theists.
Totally, completely irrelevant.
I guess if one is simple, it sort of leads to Atheism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vernon athere@athere" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
13 Sep 2006 12:38:23 PM |
|
|
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:RJOdnX-gaL3zDZrYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism"
means, you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to lose
the ability to read or understand the written word--something I think you
may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
It means neither moral nor immoral.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
No, it's higher than that, idiot.
Out of hundreds of real scientists, (earning money by producing) I have
never come across an atheist scientist. They are outward enough to let
it be known that they are theists.
Totally, completely irrelevant.
I guess if one is simple, it sort of leads to Atheism.
Thank you very much for proving that YOU are religious about YOUR atheism.
It's simple to bait you guys.
You seldom are educated.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Don't tell that to an atheist. They are too uneducated to study
distributions.
I guess that's why only about 1 of 180 have such a low education. OR are
absolutely fixated with their own ego.
Take your pick.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
18 Sep 2006 04:59:58 PM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:RJOdnX-gaL3zDZrYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to lose
the ability to read or understand the written word--something I think you
may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Thank you very much for proving that YOU are religious about YOUR atheism.
It's simple to bait you guys.
You seldom are educated.
http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm
A study in today's edition of the prestigious science
journal "Nature" When queried about belief in
"personal god," only 7% responded in the affirmative,
while 72.2% expressed "personal disbelief," and 20.8%
expressed "doubt or agnosticism." Belief in the
concept of human immortality, i.e. life after death
declined from the 35.2% measured in 1914 to just
7.9%. 76.7% reject the "human immortality" tenet,
compared with 25.4% in 1914, and 23.2% claimed
"doubt or agnosticism" on the question, compared
with 43.7% in Leuba's
Larry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vernon athere@athere" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
19 Sep 2006 09:55:01 AM |
|
|
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1158616798.651989.274220@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:RJOdnX-gaL3zDZrYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to
lose
the ability to read or understand the written word--something I think
you
may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Thank you very much for proving that YOU are religious about YOUR
atheism.
It's simple to bait you guys.
You seldom are educated.
Try a controlled study in 2006.
Face it, psychologically speaking, you and all Atheists are perverts.
Scientifically speaking you are retarded (in the general area of fields /
spirits)
Oh well.
Atheist who actually posts is ANTI theist.
It is almost a shame to bait the simple.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
19 Sep 2006 01:27:43 PM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1158616798.651989.274220@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:RJOdnX-gaL3zDZrYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to
lose
the ability to read or understand the written word--something I think
you
may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Thank you very much for proving that YOU are religious about YOUR
atheism.
It's simple to bait you guys.
You seldom are educated.
Try a controlled study in 2006.
Face it, psychologically speaking, you and all Atheists are perverts.
Uhm...cite please?
Scientifically speaking you are retarded (in the general area of fields /
spirits)
Fields/spirits?
Spirits aren't science dude, though you woulda learned that, you being
so smart and all.
FOAD, troll
Oh well.
Atheist who actually posts is ANTI theist.
It is almost a shame to bait the simple.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
19 Sep 2006 12:30:39 PM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1158616798.651989.274220@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:RJOdnX-gaL3zDZrYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to
lose
the ability to read or understand the written word--something I think
you
may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Thank you very much for proving that YOU are religious about YOUR
atheism.
It's simple to bait you guys.
You seldom are educated.
Try a controlled study in 2006.
I will stick with respected scientific journals
Face it, psychologically speaking, you and all Atheists are perverts.
Immature ad homonym.
Scientifically speaking you are retarded
Immature ad homonym.
(in the general area of fields / spirits)
Unsupported assertion.
Oh well.
It is almost a shame to bait the simple.
If name calling is your thing you can keep on making
embarrassing posts until you realize it reflects your
maturity.
Larry
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
13 Sep 2006 02:13:22 PM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:RJOdnX-gaL3zDZrYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism"
means, you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to lose
the ability to read or understand the written word--something I think you
may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
It means neither moral nor immoral.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
No, it's higher than that, idiot.
Out of hundreds of real scientists, (earning money by producing) I have
never come across an atheist scientist. They are outward enough to let
it be known that they are theists.
Totally, completely irrelevant.
I guess if one is simple, it sort of leads to Atheism.
Thank you very much for proving that YOU are religious about YOUR atheism.
It's simple to bait you guys.
You seldom are educated.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Don't tell that to an atheist. They are too uneducated to study
distributions.
I guess that's why only about 1 of 180 have such a low education. OR are
absolutely fixated with their own ego.
Take your pick.
You'll find that, on average, scientists have a much higher chance of
being atheist than the average population, while criminals are less
likely to be atheist than the general population.
In other words, atheists tend to do very well in science, and are not
likely to go to jail
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
13 Sep 2006 09:17:42 PM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:RJOdnX-gaL3zDZrYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism"
means, you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to lose
the ability to read or understand the written word--something I think you
may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
It means neither moral nor immoral.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
No, it's higher than that, idiot.
Out of hundreds of real scientists, (earning money by producing) I have
never come across an atheist scientist. They are outward enough to let
it be known that they are theists.
Totally, completely irrelevant.
I guess if one is simple, it sort of leads to Atheism.
Thank you very much for proving that YOU are religious about YOUR atheism.
Wrong again. You're on a roll. Look up "religion" in the dictionary.
It's simple to bait you guys.
You seldom are educated.
Just admit you're wrong already.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Wow, really bad math skills you have there.
Don't tell that to an atheist. They are too uneducated to study
distributions.
I guess that's why only about 1 of 180 have such a low education. OR are
absolutely fixated with their own ego.
Take your pick.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SmartyPants" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
14 Sep 2006 01:59:31 PM |
|
|
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Wow, really bad math skills you have there.
That math is right
lets say there are 100 people in the nation
11% have no affiliation - that is 11 people
Of those 11 people, 5% claim to be atheist - (11*.05=.55) that's .55
people
..55 people out of 100 is .55%.
That is very basic math.
If you need it broken down more then that then please don't have any
children.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
14 Sep 2006 02:05:06 PM |
|
|
In article <1158260371.665686.110980@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> "SmartyPants" <joshgoku@hotmail.com> writes:
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Wow, really bad math skills you have there.
That math is right
The math is right; the conclusion is wrong, by virtue of having
misinterpreted the original statment.
Of the 11% of all Americans who are unchurched, a block comprising
5% of all Americans is made up of self-declared atheists. The
remaining fraction, 6% of all Americans, did not describe themselves
as atheists.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "SmartyPants" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
14 Sep 2006 03:16:30 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
snip
Of the 11% of all Americans who are unchurched, a block comprising
5% of all Americans is made up of self-declared atheists. The
remaining fraction, 6% of all Americans, did not describe themselves
as atheists.
-- cary
Please don't do math anymore. the remaining fraction would be 10.55%
moron.
89% = churched
11% = unchurched
10.45% = unchurched and unatheist
..55% = unchurched AND athiest
I don't agree with the statement either, but don't make yourself look
stupid by trying to do math.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
14 Sep 2006 04:00:00 PM |
|
|
In article <1158264990.164424.79690@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "SmartyPants" <joshgoku@hotmail.com> writes:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
snip
Of the 11% of all Americans who are unchurched, a block comprising
5% of all Americans is made up of self-declared atheists. The
remaining fraction, 6% of all Americans, did not describe themselves
as atheists.
-- cary
Please don't do math anymore. the remaining fraction would be 10.55%
moron.
89% = churched
11% = unchurched
10.45% = unchurched and unatheist
.55% = unchurched AND athiest
I don't agree with the statement either, but don't make yourself look
stupid by trying to do math.
You are mis-interpreting the original statement. Which
means that while your arithmetic is correct, in the mechanical
sense of multiplying correctly, your input is wrong -- and
thus your conclusion is incorrect.
Garbage in -> garbage out still applies, even if the
computer in the middle is flawless.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
17 Sep 2006 10:56:20 AM |
|
|
SmartyPants wrote:
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Wow, really bad math skills you have there.
That math is right
Let's look at a survey conducted b the BBC in 2004.
In 2004 there were approximately 293,028,000 people in the US. The study
found that 8,790,840 to 26,822,520 Americans consider themselves
atheists. That's approximately 3% to 9% of the population.
This is very basic math.
If you need it broken down more than (not then) that, please don't have
any children.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Malcolm" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
17 Sep 2006 03:04:47 PM |
|
|
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:peednV3xgqiA7ZDYnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
SmartyPants wrote:
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Wow, really bad math skills you have there.
That math is right
Let's look at a survey conducted b the BBC in 2004.
In 2004 there were approximately 293,028,000 people in the US. The study
found that 8,790,840 to 26,822,520 Americans consider themselves atheists.
That's approximately 3% to 9% of the population.
This is very basic math.
If you need it broken down more than (not then) that, please don't have
any children.
Let's get this right. The BBC sent out 293,028,000 surveys, and got back
between 8,790,840 and 26,822,520 back claiming that the respondents were
atheists.
You then did a brief calculation and worked out that 3-9% of Americans are
atheists. That's what happened, and anyone who disbelieves you isn't fit to
have children.
--
www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm
freeware games to download.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vernon athere@athere" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
17 Sep 2006 06:31:43 PM |
|
|
"Malcolm" <regniztar@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:S9mdnR9gr6eBJpDYRVnysQ@bt.com...
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:peednV3xgqiA7ZDYnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
SmartyPants wrote:
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Wow, really bad math skills you have there.
That math is right
Let's look at a survey conducted b the BBC in 2004.
In 2004 there were approximately 293,028,000 people in the US. The study
found that 8,790,840 to 26,822,520 Americans consider themselves
atheists. That's approximately 3% to 9% of the population.
This is very basic math.
If you need it broken down more than (not then) that, please don't have
any children.
Let's get this right. The BBC sent out 293,028,000 surveys, and got back
between 8,790,840 and 26,822,520 back claiming that the respondents were
atheists.
You then did a brief calculation and worked out that 3-9% of Americans are
atheists. That's what happened, and anyone who disbelieves you isn't fit
to have children.
--
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
NOT BBC
Americans.
Not 2004 with respondents only those with some sort of conviction, a
controlled survey in 2006 (PUBLISHED in ALL major newspapers a month ago)
Your twit survey had no base.
If one "sends out" a survey and the "response" is voluntary, what do you
get? A totally useless survey.
AND
The BBC has never in its history sent out 293 million surveys. They also
have NEVER sent out 293 million requests in ONE survey.
The BBC has not received 9 million or 27 million comments of any sort on
anything.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
19 Sep 2006 01:50:34 AM |
|
|
Vernon wrote:
"Malcolm" <regniztar@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:S9mdnR9gr6eBJpDYRVnysQ@bt.com...
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:peednV3xgqiA7ZDYnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
SmartyPants wrote:
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Wow, really bad math skills you have there.
That math is right
Let's look at a survey conducted b the BBC in 2004.
In 2004 there were approximately 293,028,000 people in the US. The study
found that 8,790,840 to 26,822,520 Americans consider themselves
atheists. That's approximately 3% to 9% of the population.
This is very basic math.
If you need it broken down more than (not then) that, please don't have
any children.
Let's get this right. The BBC sent out 293,028,000 surveys, and got back
between 8,790,840 and 26,822,520 back claiming that the respondents were
atheists.
You then did a brief calculation and worked out that 3-9% of Americans are
atheists. That's what happened, and anyone who disbelieves you isn't fit
to have children.
--
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
NOT BBC
Americans.
Not 2004 with respondents only those with some sort of conviction, a
controlled survey in 2006 (PUBLISHED in ALL major newspapers a month ago)
Let's see it, then. The 3% to 9% statistic is one that's widely accepted.
Your twit survey had no base.
If one "sends out" a survey and the "response" is voluntary, what do you
get? A totally useless survey.
AND
The BBC has never in its history sent out 293 million surveys. They also
have NEVER sent out 293 million requests in ONE survey.
The BBC has not received 9 million or 27 million comments of any sort on
anything.
See my response to Malcolm.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
19 Sep 2006 01:49:00 AM |
|
|
Malcolm wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:peednV3xgqiA7ZDYnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
SmartyPants wrote:
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
Wow, really bad math skills you have there.
That math is right
Let's look at a survey conducted b the BBC in 2004.
In 2004 there were approximately 293,028,000 people in the US. The study
found that 8,790,840 to 26,822,520 Americans consider themselves atheists.
That's approximately 3% to 9% of the population.
This is very basic math.
If you need it broken down more than (not then) that, please don't have
any children.
Let's get this right. The BBC sent out 293,028,000 surveys, and got back
between 8,790,840 and 26,822,520 back claiming that the respondents were
atheists.
Are you serious?
You then did a brief calculation and worked out that 3-9% of Americans are
atheists. That's what happened, and anyone who disbelieves you isn't fit to
have children.
No, you fucking moron. Once again, you demonstrate that you have NO IDEA
how science works. It's not necessary to ask *every single citizen* (nor
is it possible) about their beliefs in God to draw the conclusion.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Should ethnocentricism replace religion? |
13 Sep 2006 02:31:30 PM |
|
|
Josh Miles wrote:
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:sc6dnTPZPok6pZvYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote in message
news:t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net...
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism" means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
Realistically, it means "anti"
No it doesn't. It means "without."
WRONG.
It means "without" or "not." No amount of shrieking on your part will
change that.
Asexual: "without sex"
Anoxia: "without oxygen"
Anemia: "without blood" (the condition of having fewer red blood cells
than normal)
Aphonia: "without voice" (inability to speak)
Alexia: "not read" (a neurological disorder that causes people to to
lose the ability to read or understand the written word--something I
think you may have a slight case of)
Aphagia: "not eat" (the inability to eat)
Anotia: "no ear" (absence of external ear)
Are all Atheists illiterate?
Amoral does not simply mean without morals.
It means neither moral nor immoral.
Of course simply is too complex.
Did you know that about 11% of Americans have no church affiliation.
Of that 11%, 5% are Atheists.
That means about 0.55% of the population are atheists.
No, it's higher than that, idiot.
Out of hundreds of real scientists, (earning money by producing) I have
never come across an atheist scientist. They are outward enough to let it
be known that they are theists.
Totally, completely irrelevant.
I guess if one is simple, it sort of leads to Atheism.
If a jew gets rid of his religion what makes him a jew? Ethnocentricism?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
10 Sep 2006 10:29:38 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:41:53 -0500, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote:
- Refer: <t-2dnWKim5AkP5nYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@sigecom.net>
Vernon wrote:
"kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157892885.627586.68210@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
His religion is Atheism.
If you would make the effort to learn what that "a" in "atheism" means,
you might realize why that's such a stupid thing to say.
He has been told countless times.
"Vernon" actively chooses to remain ignorant.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
10 Sep 2006 03:00:10 PM |
|
|
On 10 Sep 2006 05:54:45 -0700, "kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote:
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
That's like asking why he would want to find a cure for cancer.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "kope2" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
10 Sep 2006 04:35:03 PM |
|
|
raven1 wrote:
On 10 Sep 2006 05:54:45 -0700, "kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote:
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
That's like asking why he would want to find a cure for cancer.
religious people build civilization and one day will find a cure for
cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
10 Sep 2006 04:46:15 PM |
|
|
kope2 wrote:
raven1 wrote:
On 10 Sep 2006 05:54:45 -0700, "kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote:
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
That's like asking why he would want to find a cure for cancer.
religious people build civilization and one day will find a cure for
cancer.
If you believe in god, then where does cancer come from then?
Anyway, religion is a cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kope2" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
10 Sep 2006 08:09:28 PM |
|
|
Lucifer wrote:
kope2 wrote:
raven1 wrote:
On 10 Sep 2006 05:54:45 -0700, "kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote:
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
That's like asking why he would want to find a cure for cancer.
religious people build civilization and one day will find a cure for
cancer.
If you believe in god, then where does cancer come from then?
if there is no god then where does cancer come from then?
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: do you want to stop spreading of islam? |
11 Sep 2006 06:06:39 AM |
|
|
On 10 Sep 2006 18:09:28 -0700, "kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote:
Lucifer wrote:
kope2 wrote:
raven1 wrote:
On 10 Sep 2006 05:54:45 -0700, "kope2" <kope22222@yahoo.com> wrote:
Josh Miles wrote:
kope2 wrote:
do you want to stop spreading of islam?
No. I'd like to see all religions eventually disappear.
why would you want religions to disappear?
That's like asking why he would want to find a cure for cancer.
religious people build civilization and one day will find a cure for
cancer.
If you believe in god, then where does cancer come from then?
if there is no god then where does cancer come from then?
I have to admit I'm baffled as to what your point is.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
