| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Andres64" |
| Date: |
01 Mar 2007 12:07:05 PM |
| Object: |
Don't you think... |
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
.
|
|
| User: "Ghod" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 02:24:13 PM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1172772425.113880.103530@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than
Himself?
Ghod prefers that you go post your silly xian crap elsewhere....Ghod
wants to talk about ATHEIST matters, since theists _don't_ matter.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 03:43:17 PM |
|
|
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103530@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "jem" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 06:56:17 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:13:17 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103530@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
"fucking god"..... hmmmmm
as in really good at it?
Absolutely no disagreement from me if the word "fucking" is removed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 10:45:13 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:56:17 +0100, jem <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7sseu29r6dafjr4truod6ormg5kb8btfle@4ax.com>
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:13:17 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103530@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
"fucking god"..... hmmmmm
as in really good at it?
Absolutely no disagreement from me if the word "fucking" is removed.
I was using it in the Australian sense, as an extreme superlative
emphatic adjective.
It was not intended to be taken literally.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "jem" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
02 Mar 2007 01:34:06 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:15:13 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:56:17 +0100, jem <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7sseu29r6dafjr4truod6ormg5kb8btfle@4ax.com>
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:13:17 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103530@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
"fucking god"..... hmmmmm
as in really good at it?
Absolutely no disagreement from me if the word "fucking" is removed.
I was using it in the Australian sense, as an extreme superlative
emphatic adjective.
It was not intended to be taken literally.
I know, it was just my attempt at levity. I use it the same way.
I had no idea it was the Australian sense.... I may be pronouncing it
wrong then.... :)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
02 Mar 2007 02:58:01 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:34:06 +0100, jem <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ejkfu2hed9dovbfr8fcdqlac8g17oeuept@4ax.com>
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:15:13 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:56:17 +0100, jem <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7sseu29r6dafjr4truod6ormg5kb8btfle@4ax.com>
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:13:17 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103530@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
"fucking god"..... hmmmmm
as in really good at it?
Absolutely no disagreement from me if the word "fucking" is removed.
I was using it in the Australian sense, as an extreme superlative
emphatic adjective.
It was not intended to be taken literally.
I know, it was just my attempt at levity.
I knew, that was *my* attempt at levity!
I use it the same way.
I had no idea it was the Australian sense.... I may be pronouncing it
wrong then.... :)
It is pronounced with the emphasis at the end.
(subtle?)
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 07:04:23 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:13:17 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103530@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
It would have to exist before doing that to it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
02 Mar 2007 05:47:26 AM |
|
|
On Mar 1, 4:43 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andres...@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
Want twits? Try looking in the mirror.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
02 Mar 2007 02:47:18 PM |
|
|
On 2 Mar 2007 03:47:26 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172836046.927331.298220@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 1, 4:43 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andres...@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
Want twits? Try looking in the mirror.
How old are you?
You offer nothing but feeble playground taunts that would embarrass a
5 year old, you fervently believe in imaginary sky pixies, you admit
to not knowing the name of the newsgroup that you are posting to, etc
etc.
Get help, please.
Or at least take your infantile fantasies, and leave the grown ups in
peace.
--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
02 Mar 2007 06:26:10 AM |
|
|
On 2 Mar 2007 03:47:26 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
On Mar 1, 4:43 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andres...@excite.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1172772425.113880.103...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
There is no fucking god, you twit.
Want twits? Try looking in the mirror.
Here's a clue, moron: did we drag you into here to rub your
question-begging stupidity in our faces?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gospel Bretts" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 08:05:53 PM |
|
|
On 1 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
Xians marvel neither at God nor creation. They're too busy with their
desperate attempts at self-deception.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Santolina chamaecyparissus" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 08:37:24 PM |
|
|
On Mar 1, 10:07 am, "Andres64" <andres...@excite.com> wrote:
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
No, you attribute a lofty selflessness to Him which is contradicted by
His own Holy Word, which portrays Him as a quite embarrassingly self-
centered *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richo" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 07:10:26 PM |
|
|
On Mar 2, 5:07 am, "Andres64" <andres...@excite.com> wrote:
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
Depends if he is egotistical narcissist or not.
According to the stories that describe him he is an insane jelous and
vengeful egotistical narcissist.
You are free make up your own God of course.
The attributes of God reflect the nature of the people that have
imagined him.
Cheers, Mark.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Don't you think... |
01 Mar 2007 09:16:42 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:07:05 -0800, Andres64 wrote:
that God would prefer that we marvel at creation rather than Himself?
It amazes me that many people who believe in God imagine Him to be just as
vain and petty as they are.
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
