| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
05 Mar 2006 09:06:46 AM |
| Object: |
Doonesbury nails it again |
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20060305
.
|
|
| User: "Harlequin" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
05 Mar 2006 09:16:00 AM |
|
|
"chris.linthompson@gmail.com" <chris.linthompson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1141571206.212916.133950@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20060
305
The first two panels are so Zoe!
--
Anti-spam: replace "usenet@sdc." with "harlequin2@"
"Solipsism has always been a part of creationist ideas. The
whole 'were you there' and related retorts boils down to
solipsism."
- Ken Shaw
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank J" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
05 Mar 2006 10:45:56 AM |
|
|
wrote:
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20060305
Is the character Nathan Null supposed to be based on John Marburger? If
so, in all fairness it deserves repeating that Marburger defended
evolution, and said several times that ID is not science.
Either way, I liked the strip. It nails Bush at least.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harlequin" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
05 Mar 2006 01:08:30 PM |
|
|
"Frank J" <fnci@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1141577156.328521.126070@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
chris.linthompson@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=2006
0305
Is the character Nathan Null supposed to be based on John Marburger?
If so, in all fairness it deserves repeating that Marburger defended
evolution, and said several times that ID is not science.
Either way, I liked the strip. It nails Bush at least.
John Marburger has the offical title of science advicer and
cashes a pay check at the first of the month (or however
his pay is handled).
But somehow, I really don't think that Bush is getting
his science from Marburger.
--
Anti-spam: replace "usenet@sdc." with "harlequin2@"
"Solipsism has always been a part of creationist ideas. The
whole 'were you there' and related retorts boils down to
solipsism."
- Ken Shaw
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tink" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
05 Mar 2006 04:21:00 PM |
|
|
Harlequin wrote:
"Frank J" <fnci@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1141577156.328521.126070@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
chris.linthompson@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=2006
0305
Is the character Nathan Null supposed to be based on John Marburger?
If so, in all fairness it deserves repeating that Marburger defended
evolution, and said several times that ID is not science.
Either way, I liked the strip. It nails Bush at least.
John Marburger has the offical title of science advicer and
cashes a pay check at the first of the month (or however
his pay is handled).
But somehow, I really don't think that Bush is getting
his science from Marburger.
You mean Bush is getting science?
--
Skydivers don't knock on death's door; they ring the bell and run
away... It really pisses him off.
The World Famous Tink. (I never heard of you either!!)
AA #2069 ASA#33 POPS# 8808
EAC Chairman, Division of Skydiving and Sushi consumption.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
07 Mar 2006 12:48:30 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:21:00 -0500, Tink
<kjgrish@comcast.net.spamno.ccom> wrote in alt.atheism
Harlequin wrote:
"Frank J" <fnci@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1141577156.328521.126070@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
chris.linthompson@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=2006
0305
Is the character Nathan Null supposed to be based on John Marburger?
If so, in all fairness it deserves repeating that Marburger defended
evolution, and said several times that ID is not science.
Either way, I liked the strip. It nails Bush at least.
John Marburger has the offical title of science advicer and
cashes a pay check at the first of the month (or however
his pay is handled).
But somehow, I really don't think that Bush is getting
his science from Marburger.
You mean Bush is getting science?
That's what everyone else calls seance.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harlequin" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
05 Mar 2006 05:08:05 PM |
|
|
Tink <kjgrish@comcast.net.spamno.ccom> wrote in news:s72dncQ0qtvS-
ZbZRVn-vg@comcast.com:
Harlequin wrote:
"Frank J" <fnci@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1141577156.328521.126070@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
chris.linthompson@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=
2006
0305
Is the character Nathan Null supposed to be based on John Marburger?
If so, in all fairness it deserves repeating that Marburger defended
evolution, and said several times that ID is not science.
Either way, I liked the strip. It nails Bush at least.
John Marburger has the offical title of science advicer and
cashes a pay check at the first of the month (or however
his pay is handled).
But somehow, I really don't think that Bush is getting
his science from Marburger.
You mean Bush is getting science?
Okay, okay. Put "science" in quotes.
--
Anti-spam: replace "usenet@sdc." with "harlequin2@"
"Solipsism has always been a part of creationist ideas. The
whole 'were you there' and related retorts boils down to
solipsism."
- Ken Shaw
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pip R. Lagenta" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
05 Mar 2006 07:50:32 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:08:05 GMT, Harlequin <usenet@cox.net> wrote:
Tink <kjgrish@comcast.net.spamno.ccom> wrote in news:s72dncQ0qtvS-
ZbZRVn-vg@comcast.com:
[snip]
You mean Bush is getting science?
Okay, okay. Put "science" in quotes.
""science""
--
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,
Pip R. Lagenta Pip R. Lagenta Pip R. Lagenta Pip R. Lagenta
ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°
-- Pip R. Lagenta
President for Life
International Organization Of People Named Pip R. Lagenta
(If your name is Pip R. Lagenta, ask about our dues!)
<http://home.comcast.net/~galentripp/pip.html>
(For Email: I'm at home, not work.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Wilkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
05 Mar 2006 10:12:09 PM |
|
|
Pip R. Lagenta wrote:
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:08:05 GMT, Harlequin <usenet@cox.net> wrote:
Tink <kjgrish@comcast.net.spamno.ccom> wrote in news:s72dncQ0qtvS-
ZbZRVn-vg@comcast.com:
[snip]
You mean Bush is getting science?
Okay, okay. Put "science" in quotes.
""science""
Is that a use or a mention?
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
Servum tui ero, ipse vespera
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cyde Weys" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
06 Mar 2006 08:23:53 PM |
|
|
Sayeth John Wilkins:
Pip R. Lagenta wrote:
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:08:05 GMT, Harlequin <usenet@cox.net> wrote:
Tink <kjgrish@comcast.net.spamno.ccom> wrote in news:s72dncQ0qtvS-
ZbZRVn-vg@comcast.com:
[snip]
You mean Bush is getting science?
Okay, okay. Put "science" in quotes.
""science""
Is that a use or a mention?
What's a youthful pension?
--
~ Cyde Weys ~
Sub veste quisque nudus est.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
06 Mar 2006 08:50:59 PM |
|
|
Cyde Weys wrote:
Sayeth John Wilkins:
Pip R. Lagenta wrote:
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:08:05 GMT, Harlequin <usenet@cox.net> wrote:
Tink <kjgrish@comcast.net.spamno.ccom> wrote in news:s72dncQ0qtvS-
ZbZRVn-vg@comcast.com:
[snip]
You mean Bush is getting science?
Okay, okay. Put "science" in quotes.
""science""
Is that a use or a mention?
What's a youthful pension?
Pell grants.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "VoiceOfReason" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
05 Mar 2006 06:37:42 PM |
|
|
wrote:
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20060305
Ziiiiiing!
Love it :-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
06 Mar 2006 09:59:49 PM |
|
|
I don't know what nail you thought he nailed. Only thing is, as I
recall, it was only when controversy was put into the class and that
students actually debated issues was there intense interest. I
recalled being in this controversial class and started asking
questions. Afterward one of the women in the class told me that she
liked what I was doing but disagreed with my views. And of course
unlike what evolutionists like to say here, there is actually plenty of
time to discuss all sides of the issue. I know so, I was in high
school, jr. college and university.
JM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
06 Mar 2006 10:14:52 PM |
|
|
wrote:
<snip>
I was in high
school, jr. college and university.
Asserting facts not in evidence.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank J" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
07 Mar 2006 05:36:29 PM |
|
|
wrote:
I don't know what nail you thought he nailed. Only thing is, as I
recall, it was only when controversy was put into the class and that
students actually debated issues was there intense interest. I
recalled being in this controversial class and started asking
questions. Afterward one of the women in the class told me that she
liked what I was doing but disagreed with my views. And of course
unlike what evolutionists like to say here, there is actually plenty of
time to discuss all sides of the issue. I know so, I was in high
school, jr. college and university.
JM
So tell us how they handled the mutually contradictory accounts that
claim to be alternatives to evolution. Was one selected as the most
promising? Did anyone propose testable hypotheses to explain it, or did
it remain a "just-so" story. Was the "don't ask, don't tell" ID
strategy around yet, and did the debate include how it tries to divert
attention to the flaws and contradictions in the other accounts?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Donalbain" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
07 Mar 2006 10:34:01 AM |
|
|
wrote:
I don't know what nail you thought he nailed. Only thing is, as I
recall, it was only when controversy was put into the class and that
students actually debated issues was there intense interest. I
recalled being in this controversial class and started asking
questions. Afterward one of the women in the class told me that she
liked what I was doing but disagreed with my views. And of course
unlike what evolutionists like to say here, there is actually plenty of
time to discuss all sides of the issue. I know so, I was in high
school, jr. college and university.
Well, if that is how you spent your school science career, then frankly
it is little wonder that you have such a woeful misunderstanding of
scientific principles.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SeppoP" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
07 Mar 2006 12:59:24 AM |
|
|
wrote:
I don't know what nail you thought he nailed. Only thing is, as I
recall, it was only when controversy was put into the class and that
students actually debated issues was there intense interest. I
recalled being in this controversial class and started asking
questions. Afterward one of the women in the class told me that she
liked what I was doing but disagreed with my views. And of course
unlike what evolutionists like to say here, there is actually plenty of
time to discuss all sides of the issue. I know so, I was in high
school, jr. college and university.
JM
Panhandling at close to high schools or universities does not count as being *in* those places...
--
Seppo P.
What's wrong with Theocracy? (a Finnish Taliban, Oct 1, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Earle Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
10 Mar 2006 12:51:24 AM |
|
|
In article <1141703988.942928.59220@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
I don't know what nail you thought he nailed. Only thing is, as I
recall, it was only when controversy was put into the class and that
students actually debated issues was there intense interest. I
recalled being in this controversial class and started asking
questions. Afterward one of the women in the class told me that she
liked what I was doing but disagreed with my views. And of course
unlike what evolutionists like to say here, there is actually plenty of
time to discuss all sides of the issue. I know so, I was in high
school, jr. college and university.
JM
*
Now you're bragging, McCoy. You know you never got past third-year
basket weaving.
earle
*
In which University did you grace your presence?
And what degrees did you receive?
Put your academic credentials here: ___________.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
07 Mar 2006 04:28:23 AM |
|
|
On 6 Mar 2006 19:59:49 -0800, enriched this group
when s/he wrote:
I don't know what nail you thought he nailed. Only thing is, as I
recall, it was only when controversy was put into the class and that
students actually debated issues was there intense interest. I
recalled being in this controversial class and started asking
questions. Afterward one of the women in the class told me that she
liked what I was doing but disagreed with my views. And of course
unlike what evolutionists like to say here, there is actually plenty of
time to discuss all sides of the issue. I know so, I was in high
school, jr. college and university.
JM
Which just goes to show the US education system can take in an idiot
and produce a moron.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "A.Carlson" |
|
| Title: Re: Doonesbury nails it again |
10 Mar 2006 03:44:38 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:28:23 GMT, Ye Old One <usenet@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006 19:59:49 -0800, enriched this group
when s/he wrote:
I don't know what nail you thought he nailed. Only thing is, as I
recall, it was only when controversy was put into the class and that
students actually debated issues was there intense interest. I
recalled being in this controversial class and started asking
questions. Afterward one of the women in the class told me that she
liked what I was doing but disagreed with my views. And of course
unlike what evolutionists like to say here, there is actually plenty of
time to discuss all sides of the issue. I know so, I was in high
school, jr. college and university.
JM
Which just goes to show the US education system can take in an idiot
and produce a moron.
You can lead a horticulture...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
