duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained.



 Religions > Atheism > duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"
Date: 11 Jan 2005 06:27:35 AM
Object: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained.
Since duke "admits" to his fuzzy math NeoCon error*, his "analysis"
should be modified accordingly.
duke's erroneous version:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in Clinton's 2nd term with the start of the Clinton recession
in 2000 with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================
The correct version:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in AWOL's term with the start of the AWOL recession in 2001
with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================
Of course we should thank duke for bringing this to our attention.
*i.e. 5.66 minus 5.65 does not equal .01
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1355 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.

User: "Little Me"

Title: Re: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained. 11 Jan 2005 08:40:45 AM

duke's erroneous version:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in Clinton's 2nd term with the start of the Clinton recession
in 2000 with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================

The correct version:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in AWOL's term with the start of the AWOL recession in 2001
with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================

Of course we should thank duke for bringing this to our attention.


*i.e. 5.66 minus 5.65 does not equal .01

Thank you Duke! You utter mong
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained. 11 Jan 2005 11:26:17 PM
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:40:45 GMT, "Little Me" <soul.lover@ntlworld.com> wrote:

Thank you Duke! You utter mong

You're quite welcome, little miss "know nothing about the bible".
duke
*****
Matthew 7
21"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,'
will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he
who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
*****
.
User: "Little Me"

Title: Re: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained. 12 Jan 2005 07:44:33 AM

Thank you Duke! You utter mong


You're quite welcome, little miss "know nothing about the bible".

LOL! You are the sweetest Catholic I know.
.



User: "duke"

Title: Re: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained. 11 Jan 2005 11:25:30 PM
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:27:35 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Since duke "admits" to his fuzzy math NeoCon error*, his "analysis"
should be modified accordingly.
duke's erroneous version:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in Clinton's 2nd term with the start of the Clinton recession
in 2000 with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================
The correct version:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in AWOL's term with the start of the AWOL recession in 2001
with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================
Of course we should thank duke for bringing this to our attention.

Along with the following:
1. Bush 1, in his last 2 years as President, set the norm for rise in debt.
'rat willie followed exactly in line with Bush 1 did.
2. Contrary to popular belief, the debt did not go down under Clinton. From
1987 to 2004, each and every ensuing year showed an increase, including the
clinton 8 years. (Courtesy taliban yang's referenced site)
3. the big upswing was in Bush2's first year in his first term - taking on
clinton's post 911 economy.
too bad you missed that I failed to post the data for 2003, going from 2002
directly to 2004.
You really don't know how to pay attention to details or what data says, do you
taliban?
duke
*****
Matthew 7
21"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,'
will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he
who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
*****
.
User: "Little Me"

Title: Re: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained. 12 Jan 2005 07:44:33 AM

Of course we should thank duke for bringing this to our attention.


Along with the following:

1. Bush 1, in his last 2 years as President, set the norm for rise in

debt.

'rat willie followed exactly in line with Bush 1 did.

2. Contrary to popular belief, the debt did not go down under Clinton.

From

1987 to 2004, each and every ensuing year showed an increase, including

the

clinton 8 years. (Courtesy taliban yang's referenced site)

3. the big upswing was in Bush2's first year in his first term - taking

on

clinton's post 911 economy.

too bad you missed that I failed to post the data for 2003, going from

2002

directly to 2004.

You really don't know how to pay attention to details or what data says,

do you

taliban?

You like to think you know a lot dont you? LOL. Until, of course, someone
finds several hundred sites proving you wrong, then you move on quickly
hehehe must be simply awful being as wrong as you
Fa la la la Little Miss "Know nothing about the Bible" needs to gloat . .
*gloat*
Okay I'm done, bye!
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained. 13 Jan 2005 11:18:14 AM
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:44:33 GMT, "Little Me" <soul.lover@ntlworld.com> wrote:

You really don't know how to pay attention to details or what data says,

do you

taliban?

You like to think you know a lot dont you? LOL. Until, of course, someone
finds several hundred sites proving you wrong, then you move on quickly
hehehe must be simply awful being as wrong as you

Oh well, here we go again. Another junior atheist bleating out nothing words
about hundreds of sites, blah, blah, nothing but sweet words of nothing.
Why do you waste electricity showing how dumb you are?

Fa la la la Little Miss "Know nothing about the Bible" needs to gloat . .
*gloat*
Okay I'm done, bye!

So long.
Do yourself a favor and go read something. Define a belief. Back it up. Stand
up for what you believe. Or do the same as you've been doing and go watch the
cartoons.

duke
*****
Matthew 7
21"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,'
will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he
who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
*****
.
User: "Little Me"

Title: Re: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained. 13 Jan 2005 01:50:12 PM

Oh well, here we go again. Another junior atheist bleating out nothing

words

about hundreds of sites, blah, blah, nothing but sweet words of nothing.

Why do you waste electricity showing how dumb you are?

LOL! it's not nice being a bad looser Dukey . . . .


Do yourself a favor and go read something. Define a belief. Back it up.

Stand

up for what you believe. Or do the same as you've been doing and go watch

the

cartoons.

Now that is not a Christian way to speak is it Duke?
I think you should stop using electricity yourself hon, I can find no one at
all on this ng that likes you in any form :-)
.



User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"

Title: Re: duke's Annoted *****, Corrected and Explained. 12 Jan 2005 08:34:22 AM
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:25:30 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:27:35 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Since duke "admits" to his fuzzy math NeoCon error*, his "analysis"
should be modified accordingly.


duke's erroneous version:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in Clinton's 2nd term with the start of the Clinton recession
in 2000 with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================


The correct version:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in AWOL's term with the start of the AWOL recession in 2001
with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================


Of course we should thank duke for bringing this to our attention.


Along with the following:

1. Bush 1, in his last 2 years as President, set the norm for rise in debt.
'rat willie followed exactly in line with Bush 1 did.

Bzzz. Debt was lower under Clinton than either AWOL or his dad.

2. Contrary to popular belief, the debt did not go down under Clinton. From
1987 to 2004, each and every ensuing year showed an increase, including the
clinton 8 years. (Courtesy taliban yang's referenced site)

Strawman. Debt was lower under Clinton than either AWOL or his dad.

too bad you missed that I failed to post the data for 2003, going from 2002
directly to 2004.

Too bad your "analysis" applies to AWOL rather than Clinton:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in AWOL's term with the start of the AWOL recession in 2001
with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================

You really don't know how to pay attention to details or what data says, do you
taliban?

You mean like how 5.66-5.65-.01?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1356 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Third Rebuttal, "The Skeptic's Annotated Bible Corrected and Explained"
Since You Brought It Up, Senator Craig (corrected)
Re: Gastrich JEPD - FFRF: Corrected and Explained
Corrected! TQOTM Nomination "Re: The Soul That Cannot Be"
Re: Gastrich JEPD - FFRF: Corrected and Explained
Re: Gastrich JEPD - FFRF: Corrected and Explained
Rumsfield called out publically on WMD lies by CIA analyst - Lies in public again, and is humiliatingly corrected.
An Atheist No More... Satan Does Exist (Corrected)
Re: Gastrich JEPD - FFRF: Corrected and Explained
Re: Gastrich JEPD - FFRF: Corrected and Explained
Re: The Shroud and Physics (with corrected web site www.resurrectionphysics.com)
Duke, Uncle Davey, Gastrich, you guys need one of these!
Fake Catholic Moron Of the Day: duke (re: Why Is duke Such a Draft Dodger?)
GI Joe Veterans For Truth Speak Out Against Duke and Lady Jaye!!!!
duke Dodging the Bet Like He Did His Draft. WWJ Think?
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER