Duke???...Where are yoooouuu????



 Religions > Atheism > Duke???...Where are yoooouuu????

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 11

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Steve O"
Date: 19 Nov 2004 06:31:32 AM
Object: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu????

Read my lips, ms libby, one moment after you die, you too will stand

before God to answer

for what you did while in the flesh.

You don't want to believe me - fine. It's your funeral, not mine.

duke
*****



Duke...Is God all forgiving?
If he is, I'll be right behind you at the Pearly Gates.
And we'll both get in, right?

No answer, Duke???
Is God an all forgiving God or not?
Difficult conundrum isn't it?
While you reckon I'll be going straight to hell, it would appear, if God is
all forgiving, that I'll be just as forgiven as you expect to be.
God loves all sinners, Duke.
Perhaps he even loves you more than me?
Doesn't that ***** you off a little?
Still no answer, Duke?
....Duke???????
.

User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 26 Nov 2004 03:24:14 PM
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:22:45 GMT, GlennGlenn <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote:

I just might be doing the alleged "will of the Father" more than *you*
do. Guess I'll be going to "heaven" even if I don't believe in it.


Yes, there's always that possibility.

So you'd better drop your beliefs and wake up to your own dishonesty
with others, including those who don't believe as you do... your very
fate may be resting on it.
After all, it's your funeral.

Yes, thank God for my selection.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 26 Nov 2004 05:56:49 PM
duke wrote:

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:22:45 GMT, GlennGlenn <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote:


I just might be doing the alleged "will of the Father" more than *you*
do. Guess I'll be going to "heaven" even if I don't believe in it.




Yes, there's always that possibility.



So you'd better drop your beliefs and wake up to your own dishonesty
with others, including those who don't believe as you do... your very
fate may be resting on it.



After all, it's your funeral.



Yes, thank God for my selection.

Your selection had nothing to do with any gods. Or what happened to the
alleged free will not to select what might be the wrong god? Are you
ready to suffer for eternity for the choice you've made, if it came down
to that?
GlennGlenn
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 27 Nov 2004 07:24:19 AM
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:56:49 GMT, GlennGlenn <DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com> wrote:

After all, it's your funeral.

Yes, thank God for my selection.

Your selection had nothing to do with any gods. Or what happened to the
alleged free will not to select what might be the wrong god? Are you
ready to suffer for eternity for the choice you've made, if it came down
to that?

My choice is already made.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 27 Nov 2004 02:15:18 PM
In article <euvgq05088vj2ckfb0u4m7keb72lqjchn4@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:56:49 GMT, GlennGlenn
<DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com> wrote:

After all, it's your funeral.

Yes, thank God for my selection.


Your selection had nothing to do with any gods. Or what happened to the
alleged free will not to select what might be the wrong god? Are you
ready to suffer for eternity for the choice you've made, if it came down
to that?


My choice is already made.

I take it that's a yes.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.

User: "RainLover"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 27 Nov 2004 06:37:57 PM
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 07:24:19 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:56:49 GMT, GlennGlenn <DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com> wrote:

After all, it's your funeral.

Yes, thank God for my selection.


Your selection had nothing to do with any gods. Or what happened to the
alleged free will not to select what might be the wrong god? Are you
ready to suffer for eternity for the choice you've made, if it came down
to that?


My choice is already made.

I believe his point is that what if *YOU* have chosen the wrong 'god'
to believe in? What if you discover that ALLAH is pissed at your poor
choices and your willful disregard for Mosaic Law?
There are more followers of Allah than your God and there is a high
probability that your choice is WRONG.
What will you do when you discover this? Will you Accept ALLAH as
your Lord?
James, Seattle
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 28 Nov 2004 09:08:35 AM
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:37:57 -0800, RainLover <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote:

Your selection had nothing to do with any gods. Or what happened to the
alleged free will not to select what might be the wrong god? Are you
ready to suffer for eternity for the choice you've made, if it came down
to that?

My choice is already made.

I believe his point is that what if *YOU* have chosen the wrong 'god'
to believe in?

How does he know? My choice is ALL-mighty God.

What if you discover that ALLAH is pissed at your poor
choices and your willful disregard for Mosaic Law?

Same almighty God, Muslim name

There are more followers of Allah than your God and there is a high
probability that your choice is WRONG.

Silly statement, twice over.
1. Same God.
2. More Christians than Muslims.

What will you do when you discover this? Will you Accept ALLAH as
your Lord?
James, Seattle

duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "Les Hellawell"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 28 Nov 2004 01:06:46 PM
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 09:08:35 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:37:57 -0800, RainLover <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote:

Your selection had nothing to do with any gods. Or what happened to the
alleged free will not to select what might be the wrong god? Are you
ready to suffer for eternity for the choice you've made, if it came down
to that?


My choice is already made.


I believe his point is that what if *YOU* have chosen the wrong 'god'
to believe in?


How does he know? My choice is ALL-mighty God.

What if you discover that ALLAH is pissed at your poor
choices and your willful disregard for Mosaic Law?


Same almighty God, Muslim name

There are more followers of Allah than your God and there is a high
probability that your choice is WRONG.


Silly statement, twice over.

1. Same God.
2. More Christians than Muslims.

I hope you are not counting me as a Christian?
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.






User: "ShrikeBack"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 27 Nov 2004 04:52:25 PM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<9iceq0tt39sejf79i3llrfkvlqdea9k216@4ax.com>...

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 18:38:43 GMT, GlennGlenn <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote:

In article <9ehbq0dpvbe8kje6unu5o5u018770m7tou@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:34:33 -0800, "shrikeback" <hewpiedawg@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

So, really, even an atheist can get into heaven, according to your
dogma?


The magic words are: those that do the will of the Father who is in
heaven. His will is fully revealed in John 13:34 - Love one another
as I love you.


In the words of the great poet: "Your love is like bad medicine."
Especially when you say endearing stuff like "burn baby burn" and "it's
your funeral"... such love in those words.

Such "love" we can do without. It is dishonest, patronizing, and false
to the core.... wrapped in ideological rhetoric.

I just might be doing the alleged "will of the Father" more than *you*
do. Guess I'll be going to "heaven" even if I don't believe in it.


Yes, there's always that possibility.

Wait a minute. So we can get to heaven by our own efforts,
in spite of John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way,
the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but
by me"
So maybe the unbelievers can make it to heaven, but not to
God. They can't get an audience. They live in the atheist/
pagan ghetto of heaven.
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 27 Nov 2004 05:59:23 PM
In article <59b8bc96.0411271452.46cb4df2@posting.google.com>,
ShrikeBack <hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:

duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:<9iceq0tt39sejf79i3llrfkvlqdea9k216@4ax.com>...

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 18:38:43 GMT, GlennGlenn
<

> wrote:

In article <9ehbq0dpvbe8kje6unu5o5u018770m7tou@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:34:33 -0800, "shrikeback" <hewpiedawg@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

So, really, even an atheist can get into heaven, according to your
dogma?


The magic words are: those that do the will of the Father who is in
heaven. His will is fully revealed in John 13:34 - Love one another
as I love you.


In the words of the great poet: "Your love is like bad medicine."
Especially when you say endearing stuff like "burn baby burn" and "it's
your funeral"... such love in those words.

Such "love" we can do without. It is dishonest, patronizing, and false
to the core.... wrapped in ideological rhetoric.

I just might be doing the alleged "will of the Father" more than *you*
do. Guess I'll be going to "heaven" even if I don't believe in it.


Yes, there's always that possibility.


Wait a minute.

You caught that too. Interesting, no?

So we can get to heaven by our own efforts,
in spite of John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way,
the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but
by me"

Duke proclaimeth it; therefore, it must be so.

So maybe the unbelievers can make it to heaven, but not to
God. They can't get an audience. They live in the atheist/
pagan ghetto of heaven.

Sounds pretty cool to me.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.
User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 27 Nov 2004 11:57:56 PM
GlennGlenn wrote:
<snip>


So maybe the unbelievers can make it to heaven, but not to
God. They can't get an audience. They live in the atheist/
pagan ghetto of heaven.


Sounds pretty cool to me.

If Earl said that, it's about his third idea of what heaven is and not what
the RCC currently teaches.
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 28 Nov 2004 01:57:45 AM
In article <ENdqd.51038$QJ3.42244@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>, Mike
Painter <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

GlennGlenn wrote:
<snip>


So maybe the unbelievers can make it to heaven, but not to
God. They can't get an audience. They live in the atheist/
pagan ghetto of heaven.


Sounds pretty cool to me.


If Earl said that, it's about his third idea of what heaven is and not what
the RCC currently teaches.

He said something akin to that in this thread. He even agreed that I
might even get into heaven even though I don't believe in it.
I've been enjoying getting rather intriguing answers out of the guy.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.



User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 28 Nov 2004 09:10:49 AM
On 27 Nov 2004 14:52:25 -0800,
(ShrikeBack) wrote:

I just might be doing the alleged "will of the Father" more than *you*
do. Guess I'll be going to "heaven" even if I don't believe in it.

Yes, there's always that possibility.

Wait a minute. So we can get to heaven by our own efforts,
in spite of John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way,
the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but
by me"

Nope. Just like it says, Jesus is the only way. What that statement doesn't say is that
one must be a Christian.

So maybe the unbelievers can make it to heaven, but not to
God. They can't get an audience. They live in the atheist/
pagan ghetto of heaven.

duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 28 Nov 2004 02:23:35 PM
In article <vgqjq0tsn23855og5eq4fpqko6086nagnq@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On 27 Nov 2004 14:52:25 -0800,

(ShrikeBack) wrote:

I just might be doing the alleged "will of the Father" more than *you*
do. Guess I'll be going to "heaven" even if I don't believe in it.

Yes, there's always that possibility.

Remember, Earl: That was YOU who said the above. I won't soon forget
that.

Wait a minute. So we can get to heaven by our own efforts,
in spite of John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way,
the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but
by me"


Nope. Just like it says, Jesus is the only way. What that statement
doesn't say is that one must be a Christian.

For fun, tell me how one can follow Jesus, "the only way," and not be a
Christian.

So maybe the unbelievers can make it to heaven, but not to
God. They can't get an audience. They live in the atheist/
pagan ghetto of heaven.

The atheist/pagan ghetto of heaven. I like that. I suppose Lennon,
Hendrix, Morrison, et al. are there... not that I believe that it
exists, of course, but wow, that would be cool.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.



User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 27 Nov 2004 06:02:03 PM
In article <bq82q09tmtm1mmlbf9v6ssuuamcogmnaoj@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:34:38 GMT, "Raptor514" <Raptor514@SPAMSUCKS.com> wrote:

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that the God you believe in
will forgive an honestly non-believing person who lived a moral life. Is
that what you're saying (just to be sure)?


Yes, I believe that.


Well, I'm not going to argue with that. The believers who insist that 'God'
judges us based on religious conviction rather than actual behaviour turn
their 'God' into a moral monstrosity. I'm glad to hear you don't believe
that.
Raptor514


Which is why I laugh at some of the atheist thoughts here on the ng.

Then you must laugh at an awful lot of your fellow believers.

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

Don't blame atheists for not seeing a clear picture that isn't there.
Christians have utterly failed to present a single coherent image of
Christianity.
This is likely because they reject each other's notions of what it
means to be a Christian.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 28 Nov 2004 09:16:55 AM
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:02:03 GMT, GlennGlenn <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote:

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that the God you believe in
will forgive an honestly non-believing person who lived a moral life. Is
that what you're saying (just to be sure)?

Yes, I believe that.


Well, I'm not going to argue with that. The believers who insist that 'God'
judges us based on religious conviction rather than actual behaviour turn
their 'God' into a moral monstrosity. I'm glad to hear you don't believe
that.
Raptor514


Which is why I laugh at some of the atheist thoughts here on the ng.

Then you must laugh at an awful lot of your fellow believers.

Not really. Many do take the idea that one must believe in Christ to gain eternal
salvation. And that may well be true. However, when one reads what the bible says, it
says "love one another as God loves you", not that one must be a Christian.
Naturally they do hand in hand, but there is a demonstrated difference evident there.

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

Don't blame atheists for not seeing a clear picture that isn't there.

33% of the world population sees it, and believes. 2.5% of the world population sees it
and doesn't believe.

Christians have utterly failed to present a single coherent image of
Christianity.

It's very clear to me.

This is likely because they reject each other's notions of what it
means to be a Christian.

No, we don't reject, we all just don't see the fullness of a belief in Christ.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 28 Nov 2004 02:00:46 PM
In article <qkqjq05grlen6lme958gg6q7d6nckhr28t@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:02:03 GMT, GlennGlenn
<

> wrote:

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that the God you
believe in will forgive an honestly non-believing person who
lived a moral life. Is that what you're saying (just to be
sure)?

Yes, I believe that.


Well, I'm not going to argue with that. The believers who insist
that 'God' judges us based on religious conviction rather than
actual behaviour turn their 'God' into a moral monstrosity. I'm
glad to hear you don't believe that. Raptor514


Which is why I laugh at some of the atheist thoughts here on the ng.


Then you must laugh at an awful lot of your fellow believers.


Not really. Many do take the idea that one must believe in Christ to
gain eternal salvation. And that may well be true.

You're not sure? Isn't that a central issue? Doesn't that tear you up?

However, when one reads what the bible says, it says "love one
another as God loves you", not that one must be a Christian.

It says lots of things. The salad-bar Christian can pick and choose.
You all do that.

Naturally they do hand in hand, but there is a demonstrated
difference evident there.

The above sentence is incoherent.

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

Don't blame atheists for not seeing a clear picture that isn't there.


33% of the world population sees it, and believes. 2.5% of the world
population sees it and doesn't believe.

That doesn't wash, mathematically speaking. *IF* 33% of the world is
Christian, that leaves 67% who are not. Whip out your calculator,
Earl. That's *how* many billions of people who don't bow and scrape
before your stick-boy?

Christians have utterly failed to present a single coherent image of
Christianity.


It's very clear to me.

Well, DUH.

This is likely because they reject each other's notions of what it
means to be a Christian.


No, we don't reject, we all just don't see the fullness of a belief in Christ.

You're wrong, but you tell *them* that. I'm not going to get into your
squabbles with other Christers. I don't care about your theological
disputes, so long as you folks stop shooting at each other around
innocents.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.



User: "RainLover"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 27 Nov 2004 06:19:11 PM
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:24:14 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:34:38 GMT, "Raptor514" <Raptor514@SPAMSUCKS.com> wrote:

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that the God you believe in
will forgive an honestly non-believing person who lived a moral life. Is
that what you're saying (just to be sure)?


Yes, I believe that.


Well, I'm not going to argue with that. The believers who insist that 'God'
judges us based on religious conviction rather than actual behaviour turn
their 'God' into a moral monstrosity. I'm glad to hear you don't believe
that.
Raptor514


Which is why I laugh at some of the atheist thoughts here on the ng.

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

What's the difference between an athiest 'rejecting' Christianity and
you 'rejecting' Mormonism or Jehovah Witness?
If you REALLY knew what Taoism (actually a philosophy, not a religion)
was about, would you still reject it, or would you understand and
embrace it as the truth?
Truth be told, you REJECT only one less religion that atheists do.
Why do you reject all of those other religions?
James, Seattle
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 28 Nov 2004 09:23:01 AM
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:19:11 -0800, RainLover <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote:

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

What's the difference between an athiest 'rejecting' Christianity and
you 'rejecting' Mormonism or Jehovah Witness?

The expressed line of belief is false for Mormans/JW's. A Christian professes that God
became man in the person of Jesus, who was fully man and fully divine. The JW's reject the
humanness of Christ. And further state that other men can become God.
One can call them followers of Christ, but not Christian.

If you REALLY knew what Taoism (actually a philosophy, not a religion)
was about, would you still reject it, or would you understand and
embrace it as the truth?

I have no idea what Taoism is. My only answer is that physics and chemistry are also
true, but I don't worship either one.

Truth be told, you REJECT only one less religion that atheists do.
Why do you reject all of those other religions?

They're false.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "RainLover"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 29 Nov 2004 09:34:13 AM
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 09:23:01 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:19:11 -0800, RainLover <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote:

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.


What's the difference between an athiest 'rejecting' Christianity and
you 'rejecting' Mormonism or Jehovah Witness?


The expressed line of belief is false for Mormans/JW's. A Christian professes that God
became man in the person of Jesus, who was fully man and fully divine. The JW's reject the
humanness of Christ. And further state that other men can become God.

Their beliefs.. articles of faith if you will.. are only 'false'
from YOUR point of view... just as your articles of faith are 'false'
from theirs.
Their faith and beliefs are EXACTLY as valid as yours.
I honestly don't believe you are so self-centered as to not see that.
While I don't normally agree with your arguements, I have read enough
of you to see you're intelligent.

One can call them followers of Christ, but not Christian.

You can't look at the world and all religions from YOUR personal point
of view! You need to allow OTHERS to express their spirituality and
their faiths and beliefs just as you are allowed to express your own.
Just because you THINK you are right, doesn't make all others
automatically wrong.

If you REALLY knew what Taoism (actually a philosophy, not a religion)

was about, would you still reject it, or would you understand and
embrace it as the truth?


I have no idea what Taoism is. My only answer is that physics and chemistry are also
true, but I don't worship either one.

Taoism isn't related to physics or chemistry... well, no more than
christianity is at least. There is a religious aspect to it for many,
but for others it's just a philosophical system that advocats a
simple, honest life and noninterference with the course of natural
events.
Of course, in your world view, that's a highway to HELL... but for me,
it isn't at all.

Truth be told, you REJECT only one less religion that atheists do.
Why do you reject all of those other religions?


They're false.

Exactly!!!!!!
James, Seattle
.



User: "Les Hellawell"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 22 Nov 2004 07:39:37 AM
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:24:14 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:34:38 GMT, "Raptor514" <Raptor514@SPAMSUCKS.com> wrote:

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that the God you believe in
will forgive an honestly non-believing person who lived a moral life. Is
that what you're saying (just to be sure)?


Yes, I believe that.


Well, I'm not going to argue with that. The believers who insist that 'God'
judges us based on religious conviction rather than actual behaviour turn
their 'God' into a moral monstrosity. I'm glad to hear you don't believe
that.
Raptor514


Which is why I laugh at some of the atheist thoughts here on the ng.

Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

I admit I do not fully understand the tenets of Christianity, few
Christians do either hence the myriad of sometime violent
disagreement. This is why I have been aking questions of Duke
and what he undertands Chritianity to mean. Judging by some of
the answers it seems Duke isn't sure either. It all goes back to
the Bible which does not seem certain either!
What matters initially is whether or not Christianity is the true
religion fo which we require proof of course if only to ensure
we don't follow the wrong one.


duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."

For what?
I think Duke has played a joke on us. We asked Duke to present
evidence to show how he knows god exists and threatened
to append this request and other requests to every post he makes
in this newsgroup.
In return he posts an article entitled "Evidence of gods existence"
(or words to that affect)
The article turns out to be rambling expostion of something about
levels which even the author admits is unprovable and is just his
idea and dreams. Even Duke must have known it was rubbish.
We asked for "Evidence of gods existence" and we got an article
entitled "Evidence of gods existence". Request fullfilled!
What Duke and seemingly everybody else, including me, have
forgotten, is that we asked for HIS evidence to show how he knows for
certain there is a god.
To claim certainty comes from belief would be an honest
position to take and many Christians openly admit that including
archbishops of England. Such belief I respect but do not share.
I only ask in return that they respect my equally sincere absence
of belief, but I do not respect the dishonest who claim they have
knowledge 'god' exist but do not then present that knowledge to us.
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 22 Nov 2004 05:46:59 PM
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:39:37 +0000, Les Hellawell <myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:

Which is why I laugh at some of the atheist thoughts here on the ng.
Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.

I admit I do not fully understand the tenets of Christianity, few
Christians do either hence the myriad of sometime violent
disagreement. This is why I have been aking questions of Duke
and what he undertands Chritianity to mean. Judging by some of
the answers it seems Duke isn't sure either. It all goes back to
the Bible which does not seem certain either!

Sorry you don't understand. It's all in John 13:34 - Very, very clear.
All of the bible radiates out of that single verse.

What matters initially is whether or not Christianity is the true
religion fo which we require proof of course if only to ensure
we don't follow the wrong one.

Why do you require proof? Doesn't John 13:34 make it pretty clear?

I think Duke has played a joke on us. We asked Duke to present
evidence to show how he knows god exists and threatened
to append this request and other requests to every post he makes
in this newsgroup.

I told you - I believe. If you want proof, I can't give you that. If you want evidence,
see my "Evidence for God"..

In return he posts an article entitled "Evidence of gods existence"
(or words to that affect)

Didn't you understand it?

The article turns out to be rambling expostion of something about
levels which even the author admits is unprovable and is just his
idea and dreams. Even Duke must have known it was rubbish.

I think your ability to reason is rubbish.

We asked for "Evidence of gods existence" and we got an article
entitled "Evidence of gods existence". Request fullfilled!

I wrote it.

What Duke and seemingly everybody else, including me, have
forgotten, is that we asked for HIS evidence to show how he knows for
certain there is a god.

I gave you what I had. Are you looking for a magic portion to make you believe whether
you want to or not.

To claim certainty comes from belief would be an honest
position to take and many Christians openly admit that including
archbishops of England. Such belief I respect but do not share.
I only ask in return that they respect my equally sincere absence
of belief, but I do not respect the dishonest who claim they have
knowledge 'god' exist but do not then present that knowledge to us.

That's our fault. You demand to define the evidence I must give you, rather than give you
the evidence I can.
If you couldn't understand it, I'm sorry.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "Les Hellawell"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 23 Nov 2004 06:52:36 AM
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:46:59 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:39:37 +0000, Les Hellawell <myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:

Which is why I laugh at some of the atheist thoughts here on the ng.
Absolutely no idea what Christianity is about, yet they reject it.


I admit I do not fully understand the tenets of Christianity, few
Christians do either hence the myriad of sometime violent
disagreement. This is why I have been aking questions of Duke
and what he undertands Chritianity to mean. Judging by some of
the answers it seems Duke isn't sure either. It all goes back to
the Bible which does not seem certain either!


Sorry you don't understand. It's all in John 13:34 - Very, very clear.

All of the bible radiates out of that single verse.

"A new commandment I give unto you, That you love one another;
as I have loved you, that ye have love to one another"
John 13:34 (King James)
John states Jesus told him that, which, for sake of argument
I will not dispute.

What matters initially is whether or not Christianity is the true
religion fo which we require proof of course if only to ensure
we don't follow the wrong one.


Why do you require proof? Doesn't John 13:34 make it pretty clear?

Confucius is reputed to have said
CHAP. XV. The Master said, 'Learning without thought is
labour lost; thought without learning is perilous.'
CHAP. XVI. The Master said, 'The study of strange doctrines is
injurious indeed!'
http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/etext02/cnfcs10.txt
(Confucius like Christ is more a legendary figure than a
known real person)
Many Chinese became followers of 'Confucius' in the centuries
following his death. Many, around the world, still 'follow' his
teaching but as far as I know no one has claimed he was other
than a man.
Many follow the teachings of St. Francis Of Assisi but don't
claim he was other than a man
There have been many good men down the centuries with
teachings well worth heeding and some bad ones of
course.
I suspect you could follow the teachings of Christ, be a Christian,
without ever believing or claiming he was other than a man. You
could also agree with what Christ said in the above quote and not
be his follower. There are many things that are universally
accepted as right and good and worthy of being followed
Christ did not invent love.
The problem is when Christians claim Christ was 'divine'
supernatural, a god or a son of a 'god'. There is nothing in
the passage you quote which claims that. So no, the
passage does not make it clear Christianity is the one true
religion as it does not even claim Christianity IS a religion.
It is just Christ telling us about love.
Try "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and render
unto God that which is god's" (I paraphrase Matthew)
Which I take to mean ," obey the law of the land and the laws
of god as you will be answerable to the state and to god".
I also take it as advocacy that there should be a
separation of State from 'god' or at least a separation
from those who claim to speak for the god on earth from
the state.
This is another teaching of Christ I follow. As I know of
no communication from a god that I do not believe exists
there is nothing to render as far as I am concerned.
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 23 Nov 2004 06:00:16 PM
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:52:36 +0000, Les Hellawell <myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:

"A new commandment I give unto you, That you love one another;
as I have loved you, that ye have love to one another"
John 13:34 (King James)
John states Jesus told him that, which, for sake of argument
I will not dispute.

It is THE basic concept of Christianity.

(Confucius like Christ is more a legendary figure than a
known real person)

Yet Christ as a man was experienced by men who walked and talked and ate and drank with
him.
Christ died a man and was buried, and on the 3rd day, walked out of the tomb the risen
Lord.
It started 2000 years ago and has grown to where 2 billion people alive and well on this
earth today believe. If it was nonsense then, it would have died out quickly.

duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 25 Nov 2004 03:18:33 AM
In article <9hj7q0pa2eaf66a93mi3isfgofd0tpc8hp@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

It started 2000 years ago and has grown to where 2 billion people
alive and well on this earth today believe. If it was nonsense then,
it would have died out quickly.

Lots of nonsense has survived for as long as the Christer nonsense.
Persistence and popularity is no proof of veracity. Or consistency.
Or logic.
My guess is that Christianity just happened to be in the right place at
the right time and grabbed on to the right political coat-tails.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.
User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 25 Nov 2004 05:26:03 PM
GlennGlenn wrote:

In article <9hj7q0pa2eaf66a93mi3isfgofd0tpc8hp@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

It started 2000 years ago and has grown to where 2 billion people
alive and well on this earth today believe. If it was nonsense then,
it would have died out quickly.


Lots of nonsense has survived for as long as the Christer nonsense.
Persistence and popularity is no proof of veracity. Or consistency.
Or logic.

My guess is that Christianity just happened to be in the right place
at the right time and grabbed on to the right political coat-tails.

There were lots of similar sects starting at the time.
It's interesting to note that in most cases the best format does not
survive, only the one with the best PR and or the lowest prices.

.

User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 26 Nov 2004 07:40:03 AM
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:18:33 GMT, GlennGlenn <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote:

In article <9hj7q0pa2eaf66a93mi3isfgofd0tpc8hp@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

It started 2000 years ago and has grown to where 2 billion people
alive and well on this earth today believe. If it was nonsense then,
it would have died out quickly.


Lots of nonsense has survived for as long as the Christer nonsense.
Persistence and popularity is no proof of veracity. Or consistency.
Or logic.

My guess is that Christianity just happened to be in the right place at
the right time and grabbed on to the right political coat-tails.

Guess all you want. It's your funeral, not mine.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 26 Nov 2004 10:17:08 AM
In article <vgceq09es0m3pdscdu29j0t7p4rg1acgdt@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:18:33 GMT, GlennGlenn
<

> wrote:

In article <9hj7q0pa2eaf66a93mi3isfgofd0tpc8hp@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

It started 2000 years ago and has grown to where 2 billion people
alive and well on this earth today believe. If it was nonsense then,
it would have died out quickly.


Lots of nonsense has survived for as long as the Christer nonsense.
Persistence and popularity is no proof of veracity. Or consistency.
Or logic.

My guess is that Christianity just happened to be in the right place at
the right time and grabbed on to the right political coat-tails.


Guess all you want. It's your funeral, not mine.

Wanna cracker?
Your threats are impotent, Earl.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.



User: "Les Hellawell"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 24 Nov 2004 06:36:19 AM
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:00:16 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:52:36 +0000, Les Hellawell <myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:

"A new commandment I give unto you, That you love one another;
as I have loved you, that ye have love to one another"
John 13:34 (King James)


John states Jesus told him that, which, for sake of argument
I will not dispute.


It is THE basic concept of Christianity.

(Confucius like Christ is more a legendary figure than a
known real person)


Yet Christ as a man was experienced by men who walked and talked and ate and drank with
him.

If true

Christ died a man and was buried, and on the 3rd day, walked out of the tomb the risen
Lord.

If true

It started 2000 years ago and has grown to where 2 billion people alive and well on this
earth today believe. If it was nonsense then, it would have died out quickly.

If true,
Ditto the saying of Confucius
Many words have been expended and thousands of trees sacrificed
discussing the truth or otherwise of this I will not add further.
f
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 25 Nov 2004 05:45:00 AM
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:36:19 +0000, Les Hellawell <myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:

Yet Christ as a man was experienced by men who walked and talked and ate and drank with
him.

If true

Christ died a man and was buried, and on the 3rd day, walked out of the tomb the risen
Lord.


If true

It started 2000 years ago and has grown to where 2 billion people alive and well on this
earth today believe. If it was nonsense then, it would have died out quickly.

If true,

Yes, if true, which is why I say:
Me: win (hopefully)/no win. Atheist: lose/no win. No win comes into play if there is
no God.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "GlennGlenn"

Title: Re: Duke???...Where are yoooouuu???? 25 Nov 2004 12:34:21 PM
In article <t8hbq01jdnq54vq81qi0it3nudaga8sccv@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:36:19 +0000, Les Hellawell
<myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:

Yet Christ as a man was experienced by men who walked and talked and ate
and drank with
him.

If true

Christ died a man and was buried, and on the 3rd day, walked out of the
tomb the risen
Lord.


If true

It started 2000 years ago and has grown to where 2 billion people
alive and well on this earth today believe. If it was nonsense
then, it would have died out quickly.

If true,


Yes, if true,

"IF TRUE"??? You mean you think it might not be true?
Oy, ye of little faith.

which is why I say:

Me: win (hopefully)/no win. Atheist: lose/no win. No win comes into play
if there is no God.

...or if your "God®" is the wrong one.
Sorry, Pascal's Wager has been severely thrashed. You, apparently, are
in the same "lose/no win" position as the atheist with your
uncertainty.
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.








  Page 2 of 11

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 


Related Articles
AA "People who choose to reproduce in today's world are incredibly selfish"
--- Why are hares mad during March?
There are planets in your head!
Re: aa - The Polls Are Open! - AQOTM for March 2004
Well Known Liberal -> Michael Jackson! HE SHOWS HOW SICK LIBERALS ARE!!!!!!!!!
[OT] Re: Only Americans with pro-Bush signs are allowed to line the President's route
So, What are the rank & File Liberals Saying?
OT: Liberal Documentarians Are the Reel Majority
Teresa's nondisclosure. Liberals Are Morons!
OT: Why the old are on the march
!Leftwing Hate Dreams are MELTING!
PROOF NEO-FASCISTS ARE PARASITIC TROLLS >>> Re: LIBERALS ARE AS FUNNY AS A BARREL OF RETARDED MONKEYS! ==> Death toll an awkward yardstick on Iraq
Are chimps and humans the same "kind"?
What Are The Evolutionists Afraid Of?
OT: Timing is everything. Interesting photos which are safe for work
 

NEWER

pg.3801     pg.2109     pg.1169     pg.647     pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER