Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> writes:

Douglas Berry wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:39:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and
drunkenly proclaimed the following

On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:33:01 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

That's not a cite, loser. Cite the specific law that applies.

It works.

Not for those of us who understand what stalking really is.

Why not just admiot that you fucked up again, used a word you didn't
understand, and apologise?

Dozens of people would convert to christianity if such a miracle
happened.

But the little man won't admit error.

Beg pardon? I don't understand what you... oh, wait, I think
I see your problem. Perhaps you aren't familiar with the setup
around here.


See, Duke never makes a mistake.



Even when he does.

I keep forgetting. This is back when he called himself duke lebourgeois and
is from ARC.

"duke lebourgeois is the correct spelling but "duke's real name is probably
Earl Weber.

No one can get through to douche lebougre.
That is, of course, everyone else's fault -- according to douche himself.
Why, he's the most mild-mannered of fellows -- he keeps telling us so. He
knows about stuff. He knows more about more stuff than all of us together.
Didn't you know that? He's told us often enough! Why, he even knows that
the people who set up the newsgroup and wrote the charter and FAQ are the
ones who should never post here.He knows that anyone who disagrees with him
should leave the group immediately -- that's what he told me, and Mac, and
in time will tell Apostate of Grace.
It's obvious to him that a newsgroup established for ex-Catholics should
welcome preachers bent on bringing us back into the fold.
It's quite plain (to him) that anyone who hasn't told /him/ some
overwhelmingly good reason for feeling him/herself injured at the hands of
the RCC is just a weakling and a liar, badly in need of his help. And it's
widely known that douche never changes anyone else's name, always reads a
post to which he's replying all the way through, and never lies.
He's a superb logician, never resorts to ad hominem attacks, never
introduces red herrings and never changes definitions in mid post.
He's great at mathematics, too.

But the little man won't admit error.

Especially when I don't.

We all know you don't admit error.
Y'all talk real good english Earl.

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:41:39 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Earl, you will have to reveal who you are in order to file what is,
based on the law you claim, a false report.
I hope your contacts advise you to try it.

Per the instructions.