| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
13 Jun 2005 04:43:39 PM |
| Object: |
Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
On June 7th in thread "Why There Is no God - Parts 156-170 - The Why
Edition" in a.a. at 6:38pm (http://tinyurl.com/d3ubb) Earl Weber said,
"Pick one subject line on the bible or God, as I've offered to you many
times, and we will talk again. Why are you so afraid of discussion,
bud?"
Earl loves to prove himself a liar. Here he is lying about engaging in
discussion when the truth is that for over a year he's run from every
discussion I've offered him. Even more hilariously, he's also run form
every signle time I've accepted one of his challenges!
The most recent one was *precisely* what he asked for: one subject line
on the bible or God. Here's the offer I've been making him since April
30th (a week *before* he told his lie above):
"Let's discuss the issue of what God thinks of libel. Let's discuss
what God would think of someone who made false accusations of
plagiarism and let's discuss what God might think would constitute
what's legally required to substantiate true accusations. Are you up
for it?"
Clearly Earl isn't up for anything. As usual, he's running away from a
challenge while lying through his teeth that it's the challenger who's
running! I've offered him variations on this challenge **AT LEAST 40
TIMES** since April 30th, and he's run away every time. No surprises
there.
But why would he run away, you ask? He has no choice. The reason he
runs so fast and so far is that if he engaged in this particular
discussion it would provide yet mroe proof of what a lousy liar he is.
In order to desperately try to hide his phenomenal cowardice, he has to
lie even about his lies. But then that is what he does best.
And this is the lying liar who lies that he never lies in his messages
on Usenet!
Now we can all see how cowardly and hypocritical he truly is.
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
06 Jul 2005 07:54:16 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
I don't expect him to answer *honestly*.
And you expect him to answer you at all? :-)
Well if you peruse the threads, you can see that he can't help himself.
The plagiarism thread (http://tinyurl.com/6mf6m) was a classic! I
knew he couldn't bear to stay out of it, so I set up a bunch of rules
(which were actually a lot fairer to him than they were to me), and
stated that if he posted even one message in that thread, regardless of
content, he was volutarily accepting the rules.
One of the rules was that he respond to my questions and support his
assertions of the question defaults to me. He blew all fifty
questions, which was precisely what I knew he'd do.
He about had a fit of apoplexy over those rules, especially since I was
able to parallel his free-will acceptance of the rules with his blather
about free will and the Garden of Eden! And there was a real
unexpected bonus in that thread in that he proved himself to be the
liar I'd said he was in his claim that *I* said I'd plagiarised
material. He specifically admitted I didn't say and further dug his
hole by accusing me directly of doing it. If I ever did really decide
to take him to court, he's won my case for me!
That thread was so funny, I was truly sorry when he ceased responding.
We all know that duke is a liar, hypocrite and coward. He makes himself
out to be one in nearly every post he makes. Duke does your job for
you. :-)
That's exactly how I see it, but I do feel it's important, now that
he's earned these singular distinctions for himself, not to let him
rest on his laurels when there's so much more lying and hypocrisy for
him to indulge himself in and run away from!
Sure. However, trying to get duke to respond when you know that he
won't in the way that you want him to is annoying to others.
Then don't read it, DanielSan! But you guys are missing the point! He
absolutely *does* respond in the way that I want him to. I learned
back before the Noahic flood thread that he wouldn't ever dare take
part in a honest discussion, From that point on I haven't looked for
one with him.
Instead, I've been manipulating him into embarrassment after
embarrassment and lie after lie, and cowardly exit after cowardly exit
for months! And every time he responds it tars him even further.
unfortunately, it backfired int hat he's now arrived at the point
where he's so deathly afraid of me that he doesn't even dare to answer
a simple, no tricks, straight-forward question!
Don't you think that's absolutely hilarious? Hurl is like my own
personal sculpture. I made him what he is by chipping away at the
surface to expose the work of art (or in this case, piece of work) that
he is underneath!
Actually I was about ready to ditch him a couple of weeks ago because I
finally had become bored with him, but then I had an idea for one or
two more things I could slap him with. One of those was the "WITS"
thread. I couldn't beleive how readily he walked right into it,
drooling mouth open and eyes shut. He is *such* a comprehensive moron!
That thread worked better than even *I* dreamed it would.
if you can forget the stupid little jibes that duke does, you can corner
him much better by using his own religion against him.
I agree, and I do that too if I can, but I've pretty much screwed the
pooch with him now, because, as I just said, he's too terrified of me
to even dare open up any sort of coversation!
Besides, if you've
kill-filed me, why do you care?
I unkillfiled you when I noticed that people responding to you and you
were posting some really good stuff.
Aw shucks, DanielSan!
Your constant badgering of him, when you know he refuses to answer, only
makes you look like the argumentative one.
I don't badger him any more than he badgers me.
Duke badgers me as well. Be the bigger man. :-)
LoL! If it will make atheists happy, I'll try and refrain. Like I
said, I really think I *am* done with him now since he appears not to
have the courage to even exchange with me any more on any level and
that's just boring.
What I if I undertake to not respond to him at all, *except* when he
starts in on me in threads that I've personally opened? Will that make
you all happy out there in a.a. land? It'll take some doing, because
it's an automatic response for me to go after religious proselytizers
and liars in a.a. (and please note that's what I do. It's not that
it's Puke, it's that it's a liar and a bullshitter. Puke just happens
to get in the way mor than most fundies do!
I mean, if you were driving around town, safely and considerately, but
an idiot kept running out in front of your car, wouldn't you feel
rather affronted if people told you to give up driving or leave town or
something? It's not my fault that Puke's too stupid to get out of the
way!
It's not really libel. Libel is writinng lies about someone in order to
harm the postee's reputation. Since no one believes duke, your
reputation remains unharmed.
Actually that's how I see it, but I don't see that someone should be
allowed to get away with outright lies like that and not have it
addressed. I'd fight just as hard if it were a fellow atheist
(assuming I knew they were innocent, of course).
I think duke has a life IRL away from this one, too. Your dislike for
duke causes you to lie about him like he lies about you.
What lies have I told about him? I'm not aware of any and even Puke
hasn't accused me of that!
Anyway, time to go eat risotto and watch (ironicly) a movie called
"Intolerable Cruelty"!
B.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
06 Jul 2005 07:57:12 PM |
|
|
Budikka666 wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
I don't expect him to answer *honestly*.
And you expect him to answer you at all? :-)
Well if you peruse the threads...
<snip for brevity>
You're absolutely right. :-) Go about your business, Budikka. Sorry
to interrupt you. :-)
Anyway, time to go eat risotto and watch (ironicly) a movie called
"Intolerable Cruelty"!
Oooh, risotto and Catherine Zeta-Jones. What a combination!
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, *
* the non-existence of Zeus or Thor - but they *
* have few followers now." Arthur C. Clarke *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
07 Jul 2005 04:52:46 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
I don't expect him to answer *honestly*.
And you expect him to answer you at all? :-)
Well if you peruse the threads...
<snip for brevity>
You're absolutely right. :-) Go about your business, Budikka. Sorry
to interrupt you. :-)
Well that was rather a let-down! Or are you just bored with this
covnersation? If only Earl had the honesty to capitulate like that,
huh? But then he can't hope to match your average atheist when it
comes to integrity!
You still didn't tell me what lies I may have inadvertently told about
Puke. I'm not trying to start a fight - I'm just really curious.
Anyway, time to go eat risotto and watch (ironicly) a movie called
"Intolerable Cruelty"!
Oooh, risotto and Catherine Zeta-Jones. What a combination!
It was a good movie. Zeta-Jones was delicious and Clooney was his
usual charming self. The plot was even half-way decent.
B.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
05 Jul 2005 08:56:16 PM |
|
|
Budikka666 wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
Still waiting on your cowardly ***** catching up with the latest two
in a long, long, LONG line of unanswered questions.
Why do you even expect duke to answer you? The discussion is awfully
one-sided where it comes to duke. He is a brick-wall. Nothing ever
gets through.
I don't expect him to answer *honestly*. I expect him to do precisely
what he does, thereby exposing him for the liar, hypocrite and coward
that he is. Aren't we allowed to have fun in a.a.? Besides, if
you've kill-filed me, why do you care?
Exactly. Earl is good for atheism because people on the fence will question
more.
It was such a person that made me question my beliefs and realize that I
have been an atheist rather than agnostic for as long as I can remember.
He's good for the EAC.
He's also fun to play with because it is not only easy to tell what he will
do but you can *tell* him that he is going to do it and he will.
I've noticed lately that he will not post more than a few comments when
others who call themselves christian are involved, even if none of them
agree with each other except to say that Earl,who claims to be a catholic is
not a christian.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
06 Jul 2005 07:22:58 PM |
|
|
Mike Painter wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
Still waiting on your cowardly ***** catching up with the latest two
in a long, long, LONG line of unanswered questions.
Why do you even expect duke to answer you? The discussion is awfully
one-sided where it comes to duke. He is a brick-wall. Nothing ever
gets through.
I don't expect him to answer *honestly*. I expect him to do precisely
what he does, thereby exposing him for the liar, hypocrite and coward
that he is. Aren't we allowed to have fun in a.a.? Besides, if
you've kill-filed me, why do you care?
Exactly. Earl is good for atheism because people on the fence will question
more.
It was such a person that made me question my beliefs and realize that I
have been an atheist rather than agnostic for as long as I can remember.
He's good for the EAC.
He's also fun to play with because it is not only easy to tell what he will
do but you can *tell* him that he is going to do it and he will.
I've noticed lately that he will not post more than a few comments when
others who call themselves christian are involved, even if none of them
agree with each other except to say that Earl,who claims to be a catholic is
not a christian.
Yeayyy! Let's hear it for Hurl. He's brought more people to atheism
than any of us "junior atheists"!!
B.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
23 Jun 2005 05:08:24 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:29:48 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
Made weapons of war, son of dud.
What specific systems?
Do you have a need to know?
Earl is afraid to answer questions like that, just as he is afraid to tell
anybody where he went to school because of what I may do with the
information. (his words)
Berry knows what I mean. You don't, mikey.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
23 Jun 2005 08:55:03 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 05:08:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> drained
his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:29:48 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
Made weapons of war, son of dud.
What specific systems?
Do you have a need to know?
Earl is afraid to answer questions like that, just as he is afraid to tell
anybody where he went to school because of what I may do with the
information. (his words)
Berry knows what I mean. You don't, mikey.
Earl, you are so full of it you're leaking all over the group. Let's
sum up:
1. You claim that you were ordered to make weapons, but refuse to tell
us who ordered you, and no one can find any sort of law or program
that would allow for civilians to be ordered to stay in a private
sector job.
2. You claim to be an engineer, but refuse to tell us what your degree
is in or where you earned it.
3. You refuse to tell us what weapons systems you worked on,
insinuating that the information is classified. Earl, the bloody
Pheonix Project was declassified over 20 years ago! I don't believe
you.
So, in short, you back up nothing. Know what I think? I think that
you had a low-level job in some defense industry that allowed you to
claim deferements. Now, years alter, your gult about dodging your
responsibilities has led you to construct this elaborate fantasy about
being ordered to build weapons. And I sevrely doubt you are any kind
of engineer.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
23 Jun 2005 06:25:35 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:29:48 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Made weapons of war, son of dud.
What specific systems?
Do you have a need to know?
Earl is afraid to answer questions like that, just as he is afraid
to tell anybody where he went to school because of what I may do
with the information. (his words)
Berry knows what I mean. You don't, mikey.
I'm aware of need to know but if you were not a cowardly little man you
could reveal enough information to allow anyone to find out the truth about
that statement and anything else you claim with little effort.
The drafted, hate the army soldiers I knew in Germany, even when drunk, did
NOT talk about what they did or what they guarded in that little fenced
area on the way to the training area in Wildflecken, Germany. They didn't
even say they could not talk about it. Your specious "I made weapons" makes
anybody who has been around secure installations more than a bit suspicious.
I suspect you're the only one who imposes a need to know clearance because
if we did know we'd laugh all the harder.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
20 Jun 2005 11:14:15 PM |
|
|
in article 1uheb19p2soshbc6ttem7u09r53bci6pet@4ax.com, duke at
duckgumbo32@cox.net wrote on 6/20/05 6:49 PM:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:14:24 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
Not in my engineering field.
Then you weren't in much of an engineering field,were you Earl?
Made weapons of war, son of dud.
That's our Duke...someone else does the dying, and he reaps the
rewards.
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
21 Jun 2005 05:57:45 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:14:15 -0400, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote:
Made weapons of war, son of dud.
That's our Duke...someone else does the dying, and he reaps the
rewards.
My country told me what to do.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
21 Jun 2005 05:05:11 PM |
|
|
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:14:15 -0400, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote:
Made weapons of war, son of dud.
That's our Duke...someone else does the dying, and he reaps the
rewards.
My country told me what to do.
So much for your faith in God.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
21 Jun 2005 11:33:33 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:57:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> drained
his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:14:15 -0400, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote:
Made weapons of war, son of dud.
That's our Duke...someone else does the dying, and he reaps the
rewards.
My country told me what to do.
Liar.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
20 Jun 2005 05:49:39 PM |
|
|
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
Not in my engineering field.
That would be the field out back of his house where he makes mud pies
and imagines throwing them at all the atheists who've endlessly whipped
his sorry retarded impotent ***** over the years.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
20 Jun 2005 07:27:42 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:08:41 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:22:11 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
I think that by that time they had switched to meters from yards for
targeting also.
Not in my engineering field.
What field would that be, the one where you dug the "Comfort cott"?
--
Puck Greenman
The spelling, Like any opinion stated here,
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
Plonked by Rob Duncan
Na bister 500,000
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
18 Jun 2005 02:50:53 PM |
|
|
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
Because I never lie on the ng.
This in itself is a lie. If you never lie on the ng, how come you
agreed to discuss the libel issue and then keep running away from it?
The lie is that you said you would discuss it, and you lied that you
would follow the rules. You lied about both of those things. This
proves you're a liar.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
19 Jun 2005 07:07:31 AM |
|
|
On 18 Jun 2005 12:50:53 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
Please, that's duck gumbo.
Because I never lie on the ng.
This in itself is a lie.
Nope, and you hate it.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
19 Jun 2005 07:47:21 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:bunab11f0kps8ppc22nuj0uj1ds3r7g4ec@4ax.com...
On 18 Jun 2005 12:50:53 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
Please, that's duck gumbo.
Because I never lie on the ng.
This in itself is a lie.
Nope, and you hate it.
How old are you Puke, 62?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
19 Jun 2005 07:59:06 AM |
|
|
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
duke wrote:
On 18 Jun 2005 12:50:53 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
Please, that's duck gumbo.
Well you do duck every question, but you're fundamentally a chicken and
the entire Internet knows it.
Because I never lie on the ng.
This in itself is a lie.
Nope, and you hate it.
16 documented lies (that you ran away from) can be found here:
http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx
In addition to that, you lied that you'd discuss this issue right here
in this thread:
Let's discuss the issue of of what God thinks of libel. Let's discuss
what God would think of someone who made false accusations of
plagiarism and let's discuss what God might think would constitute
what's legally required to substantiate true accusations. Are you up
for it?
Well over sixty messages from you in this thread and not once have you
found the manhood to actually address the topic you begged me to start
and you agreed to discuss, and then **YOU RAN AWAY FROM**! How
pathetic is that?
There's a good reason you're not getting anything for Father's Day,
Hurl, and we all know what it is.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
19 Jun 2005 05:10:35 PM |
|
|
On 19 Jun 2005 05:59:06 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Well you do duck every question, but you're fundamentally a chicken and
the entire Internet knows it.
Nah, I kicked your butt on the first 8 comments on your biblical flood
plagiarism, and have laughed thereafter.
Because I never lie on the ng.
This in itself is a lie.
Nope, and you hate it.
16 documented lies (that you ran away from) can be found here:
http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx
Never lied in my life on the ng, dud.
There's a good reason you're not getting anything for Father's Day,
Hurl, and we all know what it is.
Budikka
Hurl, now that's a new one. You're getting desperate, dud.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
19 Jun 2005 05:49:12 PM |
|
|
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
on your biblical flood plagiarism
Your colossal cowardice has proven you a liar on that score beyond any
shred of doubt.
Never lied in my life on the ng, dud.
16 documented lies prove that's yet another of your lies
(http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx)
Hurl, now that's a new one. You're getting desperate, dud.
No, it's an old one, which shows how fundamentlaly stupid you are.
Now, Chicken, are you going to address the topic you begged me to
start, in the opening message of this thread? The topic you promised
to discuss, the topic you promised to provide evidence for? Here it is
again, for the coward who has run away from it **OVER ONE HUNDRED
TIMES**:
Let's discuss the issue of what God thinks of libel. Let's discuss
what God would think of someone who made false accusations of
plagiarism and let's discuss what God might think would constitute
what's legally required to substantiate true accusations.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tak" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
20 Jun 2005 02:38:15 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:10:35 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Never lied in my life on the ng, dud.
your lies get posted and you ignore them till next time you claim
you never lie.......
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
20 Jun 2005 07:29:50 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:38:15 GMT, Tak <null@null.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:10:35 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Never lied in my life on the ng, dud.
your lies get posted and you ignore them till next time you claim
you never lie.......
He ignores them then, as well.
--
Puck Greenman
The spelling, Like any opinion stated here,
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
Plonked by Rob Duncan
Na bister 500,000
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
20 Jun 2005 06:09:43 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:38:15 GMT, Tak <null@null.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:10:35 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Never lied in my life on the ng, dud.
your lies get posted and you ignore them till next time you claim
you never lie.......
I never lie on the ng - never have, don't now, and never will. Don't need to -
the truth serves me just fine.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
20 Jun 2005 05:34:52 PM |
|
|
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
I never lie on the ng - never have, don't now,
and never will. Don't need to -
the truth serves me just fine.
Where was it that I exposed 16 of your lies in a simple list that even
you could grasp? Oh yes, here it is:
http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx
And what was your response, Chick? Did you refute the lies? No! Did
you even attempt a rebuttal of even one lie? No! What *did* you do,
Chick? Oh yes, **YOU RAN AWAY**!
Any time you want to go through that list with me and support your
contention **FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THOSE 16 ITEMS** that you never
lie - **SUPPORT IT WITH ACTUAL EVIDENCE (TAKEN FROM OUTSIDE OF THE
BIBLE) RATHER THAN MORE LIES**, *****, straw men, prevarication,
waffling and changing the subject, I'd be more than happy to
demonstrate all over again to the entire Internet what a pathetic
little pathological liar you are.
As long as we're reviewing your dismal record against me, let's
continue, shall we?
How many times was it I kicked your cowardly ***** on the Noahic flood?
Let's count them:
1. http://tinyurl.com/4dyok
2. http://tinyurl.com/664yu
3. http://tinyurl.com/apenc
And what was your response in each and every case, Chick? Oh yes,
**YOU RAN AWAY** and started lying that you kicked my *****, but every
time anyone asked you for **EVIDENCE** for this fictional *****-kicking,
what was your response, Chick? Oh yes, **YOU RAN AWAY AGAIN**!!!
And where was it I kicked your stupid, ignorant ***** and ran rings
around you on scriptures? Oh yes:
http://tinyurl.com/3z47u
And what was your response, Chick? Oh yes, **YOU RAN AWAY**!
And where was it that I exposed your pathetic little cheap-*****
plagiarism LIE? Oh, here it is:
http://tinyurl.com/ablwm
And what was your response, Chick? Oh yes, **YOU RAN AWAY**!
And what happened, Chick, when you demanded I start a thread on the
subject line of God, and I did precisely what you asked? Oh yes, **YOU
RAN AWAY OVER ONE HUNDRED TIMES (AND COUNTING) FROM THE VERY CHALLENGE
YOU BEGGED ME FOR**.
No one is in any doubt of what a coward, a liar, and a hypocritical
braggart you are, a braggart who cannot support a single thing you
claim, Chick.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "~Carol~" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
21 Jun 2005 04:54:39 PM |
|
|
Budikka666 wrote:
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
I never lie on the ng - never have, don't now,
and never will. Don't need to -
the truth serves me just fine.
Where was it that I exposed 16 of your lies in a simple list that even
you could grasp? Oh yes, here it is:
http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx
And what was your response, Chick? Did you refute the lies? No! Did
you even attempt a rebuttal of even one lie? No! What *did* you do,
Chick? Oh yes, **YOU RAN AWAY**!
Any time you want to go through that list with me and support your
contention **FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THOSE 16 ITEMS** that you never
lie - **SUPPORT IT WITH ACTUAL EVIDENCE (TAKEN FROM OUTSIDE OF THE
BIBLE) RATHER THAN MORE LIES**, *****, straw men, prevarication,
waffling and changing the subject, I'd be more than happy to
demonstrate all over again to the entire Internet what a pathetic
little pathological liar you are.
As long as we're reviewing your dismal record against me, let's
continue, shall we?
How many times was it I kicked your cowardly ***** on the Noahic flood?
Let's count them:
1. http://tinyurl.com/4dyok
2. http://tinyurl.com/664yu
3. http://tinyurl.com/apenc
And what was your response in each and every case, Chick? Oh yes,
**YOU RAN AWAY** and started lying that you kicked my *****, but every
time anyone asked you for **EVIDENCE** for this fictional *****-kicking,
what was your response, Chick? Oh yes, **YOU RAN AWAY AGAIN**!!!
And where was it I kicked your stupid, ignorant ***** and ran rings
around you on scriptures? Oh yes:
http://tinyurl.com/3z47u
And what was your response, Chick? Oh yes, **YOU RAN AWAY**!
And where was it that I exposed your pathetic little cheap-*****
plagiarism LIE? Oh, here it is:
http://tinyurl.com/ablwm
And what was your response, Chick? Oh yes, **YOU RAN AWAY**!
And what happened, Chick, when you demanded I start a thread on the
subject line of God, and I did precisely what you asked? Oh yes, **YOU
RAN AWAY OVER ONE HUNDRED TIMES (AND COUNTING) FROM THE VERY CHALLENGE
YOU BEGGED ME FOR**.
No one is in any doubt of what a coward, a liar, and a hypocritical
braggart you are, a braggart who cannot support a single thing you
claim, Chick.
Budikka
Carol Can be reported at:
abuse@xprivat.org
Tell Dimitry that NYM Shifting to bypass filters goes against netiquette
here is carol Id at x-privat.org
Organization: X-Privat NNTP Server - http://www.x-privat.org
X-Authenticated-User: $$wp88bm267170ku3euk728nz
X-Info: More info http://www.x-privat.org/infonews.php
.
|
|
|
| User: "APAS Lisa" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
22 Jun 2005 12:46:46 AM |
|
|
In article <G00ue.296$HX7.18691109@news.sisna.com>
~Carol~/JABRIOL/Antonio L Santana <invalid@invalid.net> wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
Chicken Gumbo Lied:
I never lie on the ng - never have, don't now,
and never will. Don't need to -
the truth serves me just fine....... SNNNIPPP!
Jabriol did you report the rape of the child you claimed you
witnessed? If not, why not? I'm sure the police in Camden NJ
(Camden NJ PD (Det.Gibson) at
1-856-757-7400) would like to talk to you concerning the crime
you claim you witnessed Carols husband commit. Child rape is a
serious crime.
Don't say Carol should make the call. Carol didn't make the
claims about these rapes,you did. YOU MADE CLAIMs several times
that you witnessed the rapes and yet you did nothing but post
about them here on usenet. Why didn't you call the police? It's
up to you to call the police, not Carol. You admitted she was
outside the house when the rapes occured. You can't remember
what you posted in the last few months?
ANTONIO L SANTANA
3072 CONSTITUTION RD
CAMDEN NJ
(856) 962-9003
Qwest/Jersey City NJ
He attends the Walnut St congragation of
jehovahs Witnesses and clims to be a Christian claims he
witnessed the rapes.
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tak" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
18 Jun 2005 01:43:45 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 06:44:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:25:37 GMT, Natalie Clifford Barney
<SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
PUKE LIED:
and this is a suprise how?
Because I never lie on the ng. And bud the dud knows it, and hates it.
alt.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
which group oh crossposting wonder?
Tak a#344
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
19 Jun 2005 07:06:27 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:43:45 GMT, Tak <null@null.com> wrote:
Because I never lie on the ng. And bud the dud knows it, and hates it.
alt.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
which group oh crossposting wonder?
All, and I never crosspost. I simply respond in the forum where I read the
comment and my response goes back to the groups from whence it came.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Naked in a Bath House |
18 Jun 2005 12:49:38 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:25:37 GMT, Natalie Clifford Barney
<SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
PUKE LIED:
and this is a suprise how?
Because I never lie on the ng. And bud the dud knows it, and hates
it.
Which of itself is a lie.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
18 Jun 2005 07:46:53 AM |
|
|
On 17 Jun 2005 14:21:36 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Metrics has been rejected by US engineers.
Hey, Duck *****,
Budikka
You really are a crude woman, aren't you dud.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
