| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
13 Jun 2005 09:43:39 PM |
| Object: |
Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
On June 7th in thread "Why There Is no God - Parts 156-170 - The Why
Edition" in a.a. at 6:38pm (http://tinyurl.com/d3ubb) Earl Weber said,
"Pick one subject line on the bible or God, as I've offered to you many
times, and we will talk again. Why are you so afraid of discussion,
bud?"
Earl loves to prove himself a liar. Here he is lying about engaging in
discussion when the truth is that for over a year he's run from every
discussion I've offered him. Even more hilariously, he's also run form
every signle time I've accepted one of his challenges!
The most recent one was *precisely* what he asked for: one subject line
on the bible or God. Here's the offer I've been making him since April
30th (a week *before* he told his lie above):
"Let's discuss the issue of what God thinks of libel. Let's discuss
what God would think of someone who made false accusations of
plagiarism and let's discuss what God might think would constitute
what's legally required to substantiate true accusations. Are you up
for it?"
Clearly Earl isn't up for anything. As usual, he's running away from a
challenge while lying through his teeth that it's the challenger who's
running! I've offered him variations on this challenge **AT LEAST 40
TIMES** since April 30th, and he's run away every time. No surprises
there.
But why would he run away, you ask? He has no choice. The reason he
runs so fast and so far is that if he engaged in this particular
discussion it would provide yet mroe proof of what a lousy liar he is.
In order to desperately try to hide his phenomenal cowardice, he has to
lie even about his lies. But then that is what he does best.
And this is the lying liar who lies that he never lies in his messages
on Usenet!
Now we can all see how cowardly and hypocritical he truly is.
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
13 Jun 2005 10:06:11 PM |
|
|
Here are some classic examples of Earl's cowardice - over 20 examples
of the challenge that he has fled since April 30th:
What If We Found A New Gospel ?
.... and what is legally required to substantiate such an accusation.
Are you
up for it? (Hint: now is the time to run away to another ...
alt.atheism - Apr 30, 4:39 pm by Budikka666
What If We Found A New Gospel ?
.... substantiate such an accusation. Oh, you clearly plagiarized the
questions
on the biblical flood. Are you up for it? (Hint: now is the ...
alt.atheism - May 1, 9:58 am by Budikka666
What If We Found A New Gospel ?
Now let's discuss the issue of libel; of accusations of plagiarism and
what is legally required to substantiate such an accusation. Are you up
for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 2, 7:31 pm by Budikka666
Good News! Catholic church in crisis!
.... libel; of accusations of plagiarism and what is legally required to
substantiate such an accusation. Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 2, 7:35 pm by Budikka666
Good News! Catholic church in crisis!
.... of accusations of plagiarism and what evidence is legally required
to
substantiate such an accusation. Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 5, 8:39 pm by Budikka666
President Hypocrite Strikes Again
Let's discuss of accusations of plagiarism and what's legally required
to
substantiate such accusations, shall we? Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 19, 7:03 pm by Budikka666
Islam Invites Women in While US Army Keeps 'Em Out!
Let's discuss accusations of plagiarism and what's legally required to
substantiate such accusations, shall we? Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 24, 4:52 pm by Budikka666
President Hypocrite Declares Opposition to Death Penalty
Let's discuss accusations of plagiarism and what's legally required to
substantiate such accusations, shall we? Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 26, 5:59 pm by Budikka666
Why There is no God - Parts 140-155 (Miraculous Edition Vol 1)
Let's discuss accusations of plagiarism and what's legally required to
substantiate such accusations, shall we? Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 29, 9:43 am by Budikka666
Why There is no God - Parts 140-155 (Miraculous Edition Vol 1)
Let's discuss accusations of plagiarism and what's legally required to
substantiate such accusations, shall we? Are you up for it? ...
alt.atheism - May 29, 5:49 pm by Budikka666
Why There is no God - Parts 140-155 (Miraculous Edition Vol 1)
Let's discuss accusations of plagiarism and what's legally required to
substantiate such accusations, shall we? Are you up for it? ...
alt.atheism - May 29, 10:38 pm by Budikka666
Pope Announces Plan to Waste His Time
.... he might think would consstitute what's legally required to
substantiate
true accusations, shall we? Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 29, 5:45 pm by Budikka666
Why There is no God - Parts 140-155 (Miraculous Edition Vol 1)
.... Are you up for it? Or are you going to run away *again*, thereby
admitting
that you have no support for your lie whatsoever? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 30, 4:14 pm by Budikka666
Pope Announces Plan to Waste His Time
.... what he might think would constitute what's legally required to
substantiate true accusations, shall we? Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - May 30, 4:09 pm by Budikka666
Why There is no God - Parts 140-155 (Miraculous Edition Vol 1)
.... what's legally required to substantiate accusations, shall we? Are
you up
for it? Cutting this challenge from your reponse, or blowing ...
alt.atheism - May 31, 6:16 am by Budikka666
Pope Announces Plan to Waste His Time
.... Are you up for it? I want to discuss God and the bible with you.
But we tried that, Earl in the "Scriptural Circles" thread - you ran
away, remember?
alt.atheism - May 31, 5:54 am by Budikka666
Why There is no God - Parts 140-155 (Miraculous Edition Vol 1)
.... think of someone who lies about palgiarism, shall we? Are you up
for it?
Cutting this challenge from your reponse, or blowing out ...
alt.atheism - May 31, 6:07 am by Budikka666
Why There Is no God - Parts 156-170 - The Why Edition
Let's discuss accusations of plagiarism and what is legally required to
substantiate such an accusation. Are you up for it? Budikka
alt.atheism - Jun 6, 4:32 pm by Budikka666
Why There Is no God - Parts 156-170 - The Why Edition
.... accusations of plagiarism and let's discuss what God might think
would constitute what's legally required to substantiate true
accusations." Are you up for it? ...
alt.atheism - Jun 8, 6:48 pm by Budikka666
Why There Is no God - Parts 156-170 - The Why Edition
.... true accusations. Are you up for it?" And yoru response to that?
**YOU RAN
AWAY**. No surprises there. Duck ***** will out. And what ...
alt.atheism - Jun 10, 5:48 am by Budikka666
Why Do Believers Insist That Their God Is Substandard?
.... accusations. Are you up for it?" And ever since then, Earl J. Weber
of
Baton Rouge has been running away, as he always does. So ...
alt.atheism - Jun 12, 7:39 am by Budikka666
Why Do Believers Insist That Their God Is Substandard?
.... accusations. Are you up for it?" And ever since then, Earl J. Weber
of
Baton Rouge has been running away, as he always does. So ...
alt.atheism - Jun 12, 2:25 pm by Budikka666
Why Do Believers Insist That Their God Is Substandard?
.... accusations. Are you up for it?" And ever since then, Earl J. Weber
of
Baton Rouge has been running away, as he always does. So ...
alt.atheism - Jun 13, 5:24 pm by Budikka666
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
14 Jun 2005 12:24:55 AM |
|
|
On 13 Jun 2005 15:06:11 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Here are some classic examples of Earl's cowardice - over 20 examples
of the challenge that he has fled since April 30th:
What If We Found A New Gospel ?
Gee, is life so rough that you have to answer yourself?
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
14 Jun 2005 02:40:30 AM |
|
|
Oh, I forgot, a couple of ground rules so that the Internet's biggest
coward can't wriggle out of things.
Duck ***** - you're not required to post anything in this thread at all.
It's entirely your free will to post or not to post - your choice
completely.
If you disagree with this thread or with these rules, then you can
express your disagreement by not posting another thing in this thread,
not even a response to this message.
Of course, if you run away like that, it will prove you a coward and a
liar.
However, if you voluntarily choose to post in response to this message
or any other message in this thread dated/times after this message, you
will then be voluntarily accepting these rules:
1. Any response that doesn't take up the challenge in the opening
message of the thread will be an admission that you are a coward and a
liar.
2. Taking up the challenge in the opening message in this thread means
you agree to support your responses with **EVIDENCE** or admit you have
none.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
14 Jun 2005 10:23:11 AM |
|
|
On 13 Jun 2005 19:40:30 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Oh, I forgot, a couple of ground rules so that the Internet's biggest
coward can't wriggle out of things.
A discussion doens't need ground rules.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
14 Jun 2005 02:28:37 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1obta15e8kebt457smtrvum3lrbku1khpt@4ax.com...
On 13 Jun 2005 19:40:30 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Oh, I forgot, a couple of ground rules so that the Internet's biggest
coward can't wriggle out of things.
A discussion doens't need ground rules.
With you it does, Puke.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
15 Jun 2005 01:42:20 AM |
|
|
PUKE LIED:
On 13 Jun 2005 19:40:30 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Oh, I forgot, a couple of ground rules so that the Internet's biggest
coward can't wriggle out of things.
A discussion doens't need ground rules.
You're right, it doesn't when you're dealing with a decent person with
integrity, who stands their ground and supports their assertions.
Unfortunately, when you'r dealing with a snivelling little hypocritical
lying cowardly braggart like you, who runs away when the going gets
tough, then yes, you need rules, and your response is your acceptance
of the rules, whicha re:
1. Any response that doesn't take up the challenge in the opening
message of the thread will be an admission that you are a coward and a
liar.
You responded, thereby accepting the rules and your response did not
take up the challenge, so you have already admitted that you are a
coward and a
liar.
The second rule was: Taking up the challenge in the opening message in
this thread means you agree to support your responses with **EVIDENCE**
or admit you have none.
Since you're universally known to be too stupid to fully grasp both
rules in one take, I will overlook this pathetic response and give you
another chance.
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules. Your next message
needs to be one that takes up the challenge and supports your
assertions with evidence, otherwise you will be admitting you have no
evidence to support any of your prior assertions on this topic, and you
will lose. Again.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
15 Jun 2005 11:13:38 PM |
|
|
On 14 Jun 2005 18:42:20 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
1. Any response that doesn't take up the challenge in the opening
message of the thread will be an admission that you are a coward and a
liar.
You responded, thereby accepting the rules and your response did not
take up the challenge, so you have already admitted that you are a
coward and a
liar.
Bud, the joke dud.
The second rule was: Taking up the challenge in the opening message in
this thread means you agree to support your responses with **EVIDENCE**
or admit you have none.
Since you're universally known to be too stupid to fully grasp both
rules in one take, I will overlook this pathetic response and give you
another chance.
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope, my rules said you are held to the same standards as me.
Shirley you are past the little girls tea parties by now.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
15 Jun 2005 11:24:23 PM |
|
|
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope
Yes you did. Which part of "If you respond to this message you agree
to the rules" didn't you get this time, Duck *****? You chose to
respond, therefore by your own free will you accepted the rules. We
went through this half a dozen times in the other thread. If you can't
grasp these simple concepts, then get professional help before using
Usenet any more.
Moving right along now, here's the subject line about god that you
demanded. I'm still waiting on you actually dealing with it instead of
prevaricating, posting ***** and tossing straw men in your wake as
you run away as fast as you can:
Let's discuss the issue of what God thinks of libel. Let's discuss
what God would think of someone who made false accusations of
plagiarism and let's discuss what God might think would constitute
what's legally required to substantiate true accusations. So let's
hear it, Earl. Here's a handful of simple questions to get you
started. I've kept the number limited because we all know your
intellect (such as it is) can't handle more than you can count on the
fingers of one hand.
1. Would your god agree that an accusation of plagiarism (without
valid legal evidence to support it) was a lie, and constitutes libel?
Just what *would* your god think about a person who repeatedly accuses
someone else of plagiarism, when the accused has repeatedly
demonstrated innocence, and the accuser cannot offer evidence
independent of the parties involved to support his accusation? Would
your gosd think them a liar, or just mean-spirited?
2. If a person repeated accusations of plagiarism, claiming material
had been stolen from a book or some such publication, and was asked to
provide the name of the book, its author, publisher, etc., from which
the material was plagiarised, would your god want you to help the
requestor by providing the material? If not, why not?
3. In a court of law, when a Christian is under oath (to tell the
truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth "so help me God" sworn
on a Holy Bible), and they maintained that a person had plagiarised
material from a book or some such publication, what would they need to
produce in the way of evidence to support their testimony? If the
accuser had insisted the material was stolen from a book or some such
publication, wouldn't the accuser actually have to provide the name and
other details of the publication from which they claim the material was
plagiarised?
4. Does your god want you to bear false witness? I mean, if a person
accused of plagiarism has repeatedly asked the accuser to discuss it,
has repeatedly tried to explain why the accuser is making a false
accusation, has demonstrated why the accusation cannot possibly be
true, and the accuser has failed to support their accusation, would
your god want to accuser to admit he made a mistake and apologize, or
would your god want the accuser to continue to bear false witness in
the absence of evidence independent of the parties involved?
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Duck ***** is clearly ignoring his mythical master's teachings on the
Lord's Prayer and prayer technique here, isn't he?! But then he
ignores his mythical master's teachings on everything else, so why
would this bother him?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
16 Jun 2005 10:21:48 PM |
|
|
On 15 Jun 2005 16:24:23 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope
Yes you did.
Nope, not unless to agree to do the same.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
16 Jun 2005 11:15:35 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4ru3b19paekpermdp38qbjtjrvhfbc4h78@4ax.com...
On 15 Jun 2005 16:24:23 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope
Yes you did.
Nope, not unless to agree to do the same.
Yep, no need to talk rules with an ***** like Puke. In his view rules are made
for others.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
17 Jun 2005 10:42:05 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:15:35 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4ru3b19paekpermdp38qbjtjrvhfbc4h78@4ax.com...
On 15 Jun 2005 16:24:23 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope
Yes you did.
Nope, not unless to agree to do the same.
Yep, no need to talk rules with an ***** like Puke. In his view rules are made
for others.
Congrats t-tom. You have never presented anything more than an unfounded
*****-covering insult in the entire time you have been posting. So tell me - are
you the son of dud?
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
18 Jun 2005 12:51:40 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4ck6b1d9mdk1uou6dadm86b0d604cg9meu@4ax.com...
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:15:35 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4ru3b19paekpermdp38qbjtjrvhfbc4h78@4ax.com...
On 15 Jun 2005 16:24:23 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope
Yes you did.
Nope, not unless to agree to do the same.
Yep, no need to talk rules with an ***** like Puke. In his view rules are
made
for others.
Congrats t-tom. You have never presented anything more than an unfounded
*****-covering insult in the entire time you have been posting. So tell
me - are
you the son of dud?
Oh really? You must have forgotten the flood discussion or the quantum
discussion. After those two it was apparent that you didn't know your *****
from first base and thus, I treated you accordingly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
18 Jun 2005 11:58:30 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:51:40 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
Congrats t-tom. You have never presented anything more than an unfounded
*****-covering insult in the entire time you have been posting. So tell
me - are you the son of dud?
Oh really? You must have forgotten the flood discussion or the quantum
discussion. After those two it was apparent that you didn't know your *****
from first base and thus, I treated you accordingly.
I saw you repeat a couple of the dud's comment. So much for your discussion.
Quantum discussion? You must have been talking to yourself on that one.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
18 Jun 2005 01:11:49 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:7038b1l0ajk4t5jv68fu7ggrskuc831gfv@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:51:40 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
Congrats t-tom. You have never presented anything more than an
unfounded
*****-covering insult in the entire time you have been posting. So tell
me - are you the son of dud?
Oh really? You must have forgotten the flood discussion or the quantum
discussion. After those two it was apparent that you didn't know your *****
from first base and thus, I treated you accordingly.
I saw you repeat a couple of the dud's comment. So much for your
discussion.
Quantum discussion? You must have been talking to yourself on that one.
Your memory fails you Puke, just as your morals fail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
19 Jun 2005 12:15:40 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:11:49 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quantum discussion? You must have been talking to yourself on that one.
Your memory fails you Puke
or yours.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
19 Jun 2005 12:40:53 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:leoab19ac7qegamf0igt3o4lfpquh7a3lr@4ax.com...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:11:49 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quantum discussion? You must have been talking to yourself on that one.
Your memory fails you Puke
or yours.
No Puke, I remember the discussion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
19 Jun 2005 10:15:03 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:40:53 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
Your memory fails you Puke
or yours.
No Puke, I remember the discussion.
Apparently not.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
20 Jun 2005 12:31:10 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:nirbb1hkog6chm3oqrpj5lchrgob0cdlhj@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:40:53 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
Your memory fails you Puke
or yours.
No Puke, I remember the discussion.
Apparently not.
Hey *****, I have a brain to remember it with. It is difficult to remember
wehn you have duck ***** for a brain :-).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Natalie Clifford Barney" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
19 Jun 2005 10:48:12 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:40:53 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
Your memory fails you Puke
or yours.
No Puke, I remember the discussion.
Apparently not.
duke
He probably remembers correctly.
You do not
*****
"SOW! PIG! WOHRE."
St Josemarie Escriva
*****
--
"A woman without a touch of bitchery is like milk without Vitamin D."
Caresse Crosby
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Natalie Clifford Barney" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
17 Jun 2005 11:27:23 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:15:35 -0400, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4ru3b19paekpermdp38qbjtjrvhfbc4h78@4ax.com...
On 15 Jun 2005 16:24:23 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope
Yes you did.
Nope, not unless to agree to do the same.
Yep, no need to talk rules with an ***** like Puke. In his view rules are made
for others.
Congrats t-tom. You have never presented anything more than an unfounded
*****-covering insult in the entire time you have been posting. So tell me - are
you the son of dud?
duke
*****
Hitler will save the Church from communism.
ST Josemaria Escriva*
--
"A woman without a touch of bitchery is like milk without Vitamin D."
Caresse Crosby
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
16 Jun 2005 11:49:07 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On 15 Jun 2005 16:24:23 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope
Yes you did.
Nope, not unless to agree to do the same.
Which part of "YES" is it that you're not grasping, Earl? Which part
of "I'm the only one of the two of us who *is* following the rules" is
it that you need remedial education with, Earl? I've been repeatedly
refocusing you on this topic despite your evasions and cowardice.
Now can we dispense with your straw men and prevarications and
side-stepping and let's discuss the issue of what God thinks of libel?
Can we discuss the subject line of god that *you* asked for? That
you've been avoiding over seventy times now since April 30th through to
this very thread? Shall we discuss what God would think of someone who
made false accusations of plagiarism and let's discuss what God might
think would constitute what's legally required to substantiate true
accusations?
Or shall we meet in a court room and discuss it there? Your choice,
Earl. Your free will. But we *will* discuss this one way or another,
I guarantee it.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
16 Jun 2005 12:28:57 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:13:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope, my rules said you are held to the same standards as me.
I doubt me, that Budikka, or any of the rest of us, are willing to come down
that low.
--
Puck Greenman
The spelling, Like any opinion stated here,
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
Plonked by Rob Duncan
Na bister 500,000
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
16 Jun 2005 10:22:20 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:28:57 GMT, Dubh Ghall <puck@pooks.hill.fey> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:13:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
But note that the rules are now in force. You have of your own free
will and quite voluntarily accepted these rules.
Nope, my rules said you are held to the same standards as me.
I doubt me, that Budikka, or any of the rest of us, are willing to come down
that low.
But I'm standing on your shoulders.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
14 Jun 2005 10:47:41 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On 13 Jun 2005 19:40:30 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
Oh, I forgot, a couple of ground rules so that the Internet's biggest
coward can't wriggle out of things.
A discussion doens't need ground rules.
Not if there are two reasonable people involved.
For you ground rules are needed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
14 Jun 2005 01:51:06 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On 13 Jun 2005 15:06:11 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
Here are some classic examples of Earl's cowardice - over 20 examples
of the challenge that he has fled since April 30th:
What If We Found A New Gospel ?
Gee, is life so rough that you have to answer yourself?
We know that you won't make any attempt to answer the questions but now and
then a new commer comes along and it might take him two or three days to
find out what you are.
Odd isn't it. *NO ONE* on any group you've posted or crossposted to has ever
defendned you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
14 Jun 2005 05:15:39 PM |
|
|
"Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:eKqre.806$Pa5.431@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
duke wrote:
On 13 Jun 2005 15:06:11 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
Here are some classic examples of Earl's cowardice - over 20 examples
of the challenge that he has fled since April 30th:
What If We Found A New Gospel ?
Gee, is life so rough that you have to answer yourself?
We know that you won't make any attempt to answer the questions but now
and then a new commer comes along and it might take him two or three days
to find out what you are.
Odd isn't it. *NO ONE* on any group you've posted or crossposted to has
ever defendned you.
Probably because they all have him blocked
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
14 Jun 2005 10:37:22 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:15:39 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote:
Odd isn't it. *NO ONE* on any group you've posted or crossposted to has
ever defendned you.
Probably because they all have him blocked
Gosh, isn't the truth sweet.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
15 Jun 2005 12:30:17 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:40nua1d9pl6gfpk11urjlvnn9kjn0ieu66@4ax.com...
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:15:39 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn" <nospam@here.com>
wrote:
Odd isn't it. *NO ONE* on any group you've posted or crossposted to has
ever defendned you.
Probably because they all have him blocked
Gosh, isn't the truth sweet.
I would block him, but he is such an ignorant ***** that I rather enjoy this
:-).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Natalie Clifford Barney" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
15 Jun 2005 12:33:44 AM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:40nua1d9pl6gfpk11urjlvnn9kjn0ieu66@4ax.com...
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:15:39 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn" <nospam@here.com>
wrote:
Odd isn't it. *NO ONE* on any group you've posted or crossposted to has
ever defendned you.
Probably because they all have him blocked
Gosh, isn't the truth sweet.
I would block him, but he is such an ignorant ***** that I rather enjoy this
:-).
Duke is a bandwidth occupying lesion.........
A syphilitic lesion at that
--
"A woman without a touch of bitchery is like milk without Vitamin D."
Caresse Crosby
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Earl J. Weber Running Scared!! |
15 Jun 2005 01:35:45 AM |
|
|
PUKE LIED:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:15:39 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote:
Odd isn't it. *NO ONE* on any group you've posted or crossposted to has
ever defendned you.
Probably because they all have him blocked
Gosh, isn't the truth sweet.
The truth is that you;ve been running from this challenge since April
30th:
Let's discuss the issue of what God thinks of libel. Let's discuss
what God would think of someone who made false accusations of
plagiarism and let's discuss what God might think would constitute
what's legally required to substantiate true accusations.
I've repeatedly asked you if you're up for it, but the painful truth is
that you haven't been up for it since puberty half-a-century ago, have
you, Earl?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
