Religions > Atheism > Earthquack's new 419 scam (and trying to cover his a**) - busted again!
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Demon Chunky Style" |
| Date: |
02 Jan 2007 03:50:41 PM |
| Object: |
Earthquack's new 419 scam (and trying to cover his a**) - busted again! |
Andy Chung of the Ridgeview Institute wrote:
Meanwhile, HIS brethren have been blessed:
http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/DreadNought
... and continue to be blessed:
http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/Guarantee
(note: Only those who are blessed by GOD will have access to these
OurLittle.net articles per a secure IP database. All others will have
to make charitable $30.00 donations to TheWellnessFoundation.com first
to gain access.)
What's the problem with free access to the information, nutjob? Did you
get a call from James Shaw or something? Toeing that legal line again?
Abusing your net privileges again?
http://www.ourlittle.net/
james.shaw@ourlittle.net
P.S. You remain convicted.
.
|
|
| User: "GOD aka Jaguar and sometimes referred to as THE HOLY SPIRIT or the voices in Andy B. Chumps head" |
|
| Title: Re: Earthquack's new 419 scam (and trying to cover his a**) - busted again! |
02 Jan 2007 03:57:12 PM |
|
|
Chunks needs the money to pay hookers to spend time with him. Blow jobs
dont grow on fig trees.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Karl Childers Karl" |
|
| Title: Re: Earthquack's new 419 scam (and trying to cover his a**) - busted again! |
02 Jan 2007 04:01:29 PM |
|
|
Demon Chunky Style wrote:
Andy Chung of the Ridgeview Institute wrote:
Meanwhile, HIS brethren have been blessed:
http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/DreadNought
... and continue to be blessed:
http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/Guarantee
(note: Only those who are blessed by GOD will have access to these
OurLittle.net articles per a secure IP database. All others will
have to make charitable $30.00 donations to
TheWellnessFoundation.com first to gain access.)
What's the problem with free access to the information, nutjob? Did
you get a call from James Shaw or something? Toeing that legal line
again? Abusing your net privileges again?
http://www.ourlittle.net/
james.shaw@ourlittle.net
P.S. You remain convicted.
And you, and Art Deco (whom I used to enjoy reading but
maybe-you're-a-sock-of-his-and-I-dunno-and-I-don't-care) and anybody else
who pays attention to that quack, Chung all deserve some kind of kook award.
WAIT a SECOND!
Has Chung been nominated for the "Golden Killfile" I know I can't do it
becuase I'm a n00b, but if someome else does, and it gets seconded, and he
wins, would that preclude any of the AUK regs from replying to him in the
future? Or do I not understand the consequences of the award properly?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Demon Chunky Style" |
|
| Title: Re: Earthquack's new 419 scam (and trying to cover his a**) - busted again! |
02 Jan 2007 04:14:26 PM |
|
|
Karl Childers wrote:
WAIT a SECOND!
Has Chung been nominated for the "Golden Killfile"
Yes, and he won as expected:
http://groups.google.com.bh/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/51f8d7ec9131afef?dmode=source&hl=en
I know I can't do it becuase I'm a n00b,
This much is certain. If you knew what you were talking about, you'd
that you *can* nominate.
Just make it good (with links to proof) or YOU'LL be the one mocked out
of town on a rail.
but if someome else does, and it gets seconded, and he
wins, would that preclude any of the AUK regs from replying to him in the
future?
No.
Or do I not understand the consequences of the award properly?
Probably not.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Karl Childers Karl" |
|
| Title: Re: Earthquack's new 419 scam (and trying to cover his a**) - busted again! |
02 Jan 2007 04:22:29 PM |
|
|
Demon Chunky Style wrote:
Karl Childers wrote:
WAIT a SECOND!
Has Chung been nominated for the "Golden Killfile"
Yes, and he won as expected:
http://groups.google.com.bh/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/51f8d7ec9131afef?dmode=source&hl=en
I know I can't do it becuase I'm a n00b,
This much is certain. If you knew what you were talking about, you'd
that you *can* nominate.
Just make it good (with links to proof) or YOU'LL be the one mocked
out of town on a rail.
but if someome else does, and it gets seconded, and he
wins, would that preclude any of the AUK regs from replying to him
in the future?
No.
Or do I not understand the consequences of the award properly?
Probably not.
Fair enough. :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
