Religions > Atheism > Editorial: State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Jason Spaceman" |
| Date: |
02 Feb 2004 03:27:57 AM |
| Object: |
Editorial: State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity |
From the article:
------------------------------------------
Ever try to listen to someone talk at a party but find yourself unable
to focus because they have spinach stuck in their teeth?
After describing evolution as a "controversial buzzword" and striking
the term from Georgia's proposed curriculum, state School
Superintendent Kathy Cox has spinach caught in her teeth. And nobody
is going to hear another word she has to say about the new k-12
curriculum until she cleans it up. To do so, Cox has to stop acting
like a politician and start acting like an educator.
The state was hanging its hopes for academic improvement on its
long-awaited overhaul of the current curriculum that's been condemned
as "a mile wide and an inch deep." Cox hired nationally renowned
education experts, including Diane Ravitch and James Rutherford, and
assembled a panel of teachers.
Now, by eliminating any mention of evolution from the resulting
product, Cox has cast the integrity and the intelligence of the
process in doubt and raised questions about her ability to provide the
education leadership necessary to prepare Georgia students for an
information economy.
--------------------------------------------
Read it at
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0204a/02evolution.html
J. Spaceman
.
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Editorial: State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity |
04 Feb 2004 04:04:24 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:27:57 +0000 (UTC), Jason Spaceman
<I@Eat.Spammers.For.Breakfast.com>, Message ID:
<ru5s10la4k7bpumucu4s6qu9c74jsisau6@4ax.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0204a/02evolution.html
State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity
Ever try to listen to someone talk at a party but find yourself unable
to focus because they have spinach stuck in their teeth?
After describing evolution as a "controversial buzzword" and striking
the term from Georgia's proposed curriculum, state School Superintendent
Kathy Cox has spinach caught in her teeth. And nobody is going to hear
another word she has to say about the new k-12 curriculum until she
cleans it up. To do so, Cox has to stop acting like a politician and
start acting like an educator.
The state was hanging its hopes for academic improvement on its
long-awaited overhaul of the current curriculum that's been condemned as
"a mile wide and an inch deep." Cox hired nationally renowned education
experts, including Diane Ravitch and James Rutherford, and assembled a
panel of teachers.
Now, by eliminating any mention of evolution from the resulting product,
Cox has cast the integrity and the intelligence of the process in doubt
and raised questions about her ability to provide the education
leadership necessary to prepare Georgia students for an information
economy.
As a former teacher in a high-performing district, Cox would never have
permitted politics to compromise her McIntosh High School social studies
class. Had she tried, the parents of Fayette County would have
confiscated her chalk and sent her packing.
Fayette parents, like parents everywhere, want their children to be well
educated. They want them enrolled in Advanced-Placement Biology, which,
according to the College Board's Web site, requires students to devote
25 percent of their time to "heredity and evolution." They want them to
get into Georgia Tech and Duke, and they want them to win jobs at the
high-tech firms that the governor says are critical to Georgia's
economic future.
Well, those high-tech firms are now looking toward North Carolina after
Cox confirmed every stereotype about Southern ignorance with her
explanation of why Georgia ought to teach evolutionary science without
using the e-word itself. Instead, Cox advocates replacing "evolution"
with "biological changes over time."
"The unfortunate truth is that evolution has become a controversial
buzzword that could prevent some from reading the proposed biology
curriculum comprehensive document with multiple scientific models woven
throughout," says Cox.
Cox's irrational position is a sop to a handful of religious hard-liners
who believe that schools should teach creationism, a belief born of
faith rather than science. If faith replaces science as the standard in
Georgia's classrooms, can we expect the banishment of globes from
geography classes to placate the flat-Earth folks? Would alchemy be
given equal time with chemistry? That seems to be the direction we're
headed: backward.
© 2004 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Editorial: State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity |
05 Feb 2004 01:18:19 AM |
|
|
In article <05r220tlir64eo3jihcfgsugr25jj4ju2k@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:27:57 +0000 (UTC), Jason Spaceman
<I@Eat.Spammers.For.Breakfast.com>, Message ID:
<ru5s10la4k7bpumucu4s6qu9c74jsisau6@4ax.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0204a/02evolution.html
State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity
Ever try to listen to someone talk at a party but find yourself unable
to focus because they have spinach stuck in their teeth?
After describing evolution as a "controversial buzzword" and striking
the term from Georgia's proposed curriculum, state School Superintendent
Kathy Cox has spinach caught in her teeth. And nobody is going to hear
another word she has to say about the new k-12 curriculum until she
cleans it up. To do so, Cox has to stop acting like a politician and
start acting like an educator.
The state was hanging its hopes for academic improvement on its
long-awaited overhaul of the current curriculum that's been condemned as
"a mile wide and an inch deep." Cox hired nationally renowned education
experts, including Diane Ravitch and James Rutherford, and assembled a
panel of teachers.
Now, by eliminating any mention of evolution from the resulting product,
Cox has cast the integrity and the intelligence of the process in doubt
and raised questions about her ability to provide the education
leadership necessary to prepare Georgia students for an information
economy.
As a former teacher in a high-performing district, Cox would never have
permitted politics to compromise her McIntosh High School social studies
class. Had she tried, the parents of Fayette County would have
confiscated her chalk and sent her packing.
Fayette parents, like parents everywhere, want their children to be well
educated. They want them enrolled in Advanced-Placement Biology, which,
according to the College Board's Web site, requires students to devote
25 percent of their time to "heredity and evolution." They want them to
get into Georgia Tech and Duke, and they want them to win jobs at the
high-tech firms that the governor says are critical to Georgia's
economic future.
Well, those high-tech firms are now looking toward North Carolina after
Cox confirmed every stereotype about Southern ignorance with her
explanation of why Georgia ought to teach evolutionary science without
using the e-word itself. Instead, Cox advocates replacing "evolution"
with "biological changes over time."
"The unfortunate truth is that evolution has become a controversial
buzzword that could prevent some from reading the proposed biology
curriculum comprehensive document with multiple scientific models woven
throughout," says Cox.
Cox's irrational position is a sop to a handful of religious hard-liners
who believe that schools should teach creationism, a belief born of
faith rather than science. If faith replaces science as the standard in
Georgia's classrooms, can we expect the banishment of globes from
geography classes to placate the flat-Earth folks? Would alchemy be
given equal time with chemistry? That seems to be the direction we're
headed: backward.
.....and of course, astrology should be taught along with astronomy. Who
ever heard of a subject removed from a school curriculum because is was
a "controversial buzzword"? Why don't they talk to some scientists. In
the mainstream scientific community. 'Evolution' is hardly a buzzword
and there is no controversy about it.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, bit in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Editorial: State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity |
05 Feb 2004 06:42:55 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:18:19 +0000 (UTC), johac
<jhachm@ixpresremove.com>, Message ID:
<jhachm-E28087.23220504022004@news-60.giganews.com> wrote in
alt.atheism;
In article <05r220tlir64eo3jihcfgsugr25jj4ju2k@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:27:57 +0000 (UTC), Jason Spaceman
<I@Eat.Spammers.For.Breakfast.com>, Message ID:
<ru5s10la4k7bpumucu4s6qu9c74jsisau6@4ax.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0204a/02evolution.html
State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity
Ever try to listen to someone talk at a party but find yourself unable
to focus because they have spinach stuck in their teeth?
After describing evolution as a "controversial buzzword" and striking
the term from Georgia's proposed curriculum, state School Superintendent
Kathy Cox has spinach caught in her teeth. And nobody is going to hear
another word she has to say about the new k-12 curriculum until she
cleans it up. To do so, Cox has to stop acting like a politician and
start acting like an educator.
(snip)
"The unfortunate truth is that evolution has become a controversial
buzzword that could prevent some from reading the proposed biology
curriculum comprehensive document with multiple scientific models woven
throughout," says Cox.
Cox's irrational position is a sop to a handful of religious hard-liners
who believe that schools should teach creationism, a belief born of
faith rather than science. If faith replaces science as the standard in
Georgia's classrooms, can we expect the banishment of globes from
geography classes to placate the flat-Earth folks? Would alchemy be
given equal time with chemistry? That seems to be the direction we're
headed: backward.
....and of course, astrology should be taught along with astronomy. Who
ever heard of a subject removed from a school curriculum because is was
a "controversial buzzword"? Why don't they talk to some scientists. In
the mainstream scientific community. 'Evolution' is hardly a buzzword
and there is no controversy about it.
/fundy
Scientists aren't an *authority.* (Sniff) Scientists do not do "God's
Work(tm)" as their world is of absurdities, lies, and deceit. There
world is not of 'God' but is, instead of 'Satan.' Their world is one of
'ungodliness' which leads to cheating at Bingo and even worse
attrocities.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Editorial: State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity |
06 Feb 2004 12:32:27 AM |
|
|
In article <cmo520hl1d6m2rvakr18ncpj9uj66j31pd@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:18:19 +0000 (UTC), johac
<jhachm@ixpresremove.com>, Message ID:
<jhachm-E28087.23220504022004@news-60.giganews.com> wrote in
alt.atheism;
In article <05r220tlir64eo3jihcfgsugr25jj4ju2k@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:27:57 +0000 (UTC), Jason Spaceman
<I@Eat.Spammers.For.Breakfast.com>, Message ID:
<ru5s10la4k7bpumucu4s6qu9c74jsisau6@4ax.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0204a/02evolution.html
State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity
Ever try to listen to someone talk at a party but find yourself unable
to focus because they have spinach stuck in their teeth?
After describing evolution as a "controversial buzzword" and striking
the term from Georgia's proposed curriculum, state School Superintendent
Kathy Cox has spinach caught in her teeth. And nobody is going to hear
another word she has to say about the new k-12 curriculum until she
cleans it up. To do so, Cox has to stop acting like a politician and
start acting like an educator.
(snip)
"The unfortunate truth is that evolution has become a controversial
buzzword that could prevent some from reading the proposed biology
curriculum comprehensive document with multiple scientific models woven
throughout," says Cox.
Cox's irrational position is a sop to a handful of religious hard-liners
who believe that schools should teach creationism, a belief born of
faith rather than science. If faith replaces science as the standard in
Georgia's classrooms, can we expect the banishment of globes from
geography classes to placate the flat-Earth folks? Would alchemy be
given equal time with chemistry? That seems to be the direction we're
headed: backward.
....and of course, astrology should be taught along with astronomy. Who
ever heard of a subject removed from a school curriculum because is was
a "controversial buzzword"? Why don't they talk to some scientists. In
the mainstream scientific community. 'Evolution' is hardly a buzzword
and there is no controversy about it.
/fundy
Scientists aren't an *authority.* (Sniff) Scientists do not do "God's
Work(tm)" as their world is of absurdities, lies, and deceit. There
world is not of 'God' but is, instead of 'Satan.' Their world is one of
'ungodliness' which leads to cheating at Bingo and even worse
attrocities.
If it wasn't for those darn scientists, we'd still be swinging from
trees, the way that *GAWD* intended us to do.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, bit in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Editorial: State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity |
06 Feb 2004 07:23:42 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 06:32:27 +0000 (UTC), johac
<jhachm@ixpresremove.com>, Message ID:
<jhachm-F12FE2.22361805022004@news-60.giganews.com> wrote in
alt.atheism;
In article <cmo520hl1d6m2rvakr18ncpj9uj66j31pd@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:18:19 +0000 (UTC), johac
<jhachm@ixpresremove.com>, Message ID:
<jhachm-E28087.23220504022004@news-60.giganews.com> wrote in
alt.atheism;
In article <05r220tlir64eo3jihcfgsugr25jj4ju2k@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:27:57 +0000 (UTC), Jason Spaceman
<I@Eat.Spammers.For.Breakfast.com>, Message ID:
<ru5s10la4k7bpumucu4s6qu9c74jsisau6@4ax.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0204a/02evolution.html
State stance on evolution a devolution into stupidity
Ever try to listen to someone talk at a party but find yourself unable
to focus because they have spinach stuck in their teeth?
After describing evolution as a "controversial buzzword" and striking
the term from Georgia's proposed curriculum, state School Superintendent
Kathy Cox has spinach caught in her teeth. And nobody is going to hear
another word she has to say about the new k-12 curriculum until she
cleans it up. To do so, Cox has to stop acting like a politician and
start acting like an educator.
(snip)
"The unfortunate truth is that evolution has become a controversial
buzzword that could prevent some from reading the proposed biology
curriculum comprehensive document with multiple scientific models woven
throughout," says Cox.
Cox's irrational position is a sop to a handful of religious hard-liners
who believe that schools should teach creationism, a belief born of
faith rather than science. If faith replaces science as the standard in
Georgia's classrooms, can we expect the banishment of globes from
geography classes to placate the flat-Earth folks? Would alchemy be
given equal time with chemistry? That seems to be the direction we're
headed: backward.
....and of course, astrology should be taught along with astronomy. Who
ever heard of a subject removed from a school curriculum because is was
a "controversial buzzword"? Why don't they talk to some scientists. In
the mainstream scientific community. 'Evolution' is hardly a buzzword
and there is no controversy about it.
/fundy
Scientists aren't an *authority.* (Sniff) Scientists do not do "God's
Work(tm)" as their world is of absurdities, lies, and deceit. There
world is not of 'God' but is, instead of 'Satan.' Their world is one of
'ungodliness' which leads to cheating at Bingo and even worse
attrocities.
If it wasn't for those darn scientists, we'd still be swinging from
trees, the way that *GAWD* intended us to do.
And scratching fleas.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|