| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Colin Powell" |
| Date: |
05 Oct 2004 08:54:21 PM |
| Object: |
Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their Neo-Nazi Party!
John Edwards wipes the floor with the old ***** in the debate!
Poor junkyard dog Cheney sniveled and barked his way through a pack of lies that even he
couldn't tell with a straight face. He could barely conceal his urge to laugh at the ridiculous
pathetic mountain of manure his administration has been feeding the American people.
They STILL don't get it:
- Their first priority should have been the war on terror, not Iraq.
- They were supposed to be after Bin Laden, not Hussein.
- There were NO WMDs!
- They had Bin Laden surrounded and they dropped the ball to go into Iraq.
- They bungled the war on terror AND the war in Iraq.
- All those American deaths in Iraq were in vain
- Repeating the same old LIES over and over only makes them look WORSE.
Bush is on his knees every day in the White House sucking Old *****'s ***** and Old ***** is
fucking Dubya in the ***** and they don't know and DON'T CARE that the U.S. is going down the
toilet.
Vote these motherfuckers out next month and throw OLD ***** and SHRUB in jail for life without
parole!
Bush says he talks to God. Let him talk to God in JAIL!
.
|
|
| User: "Riley The Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
05 Oct 2004 09:05:59 PM |
|
|
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?ISO-8859-15?Q?=A3=C5r=D0=C5=A7=A7?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
05 Oct 2004 09:09:25 PM |
|
|
In article <koI8d.19541$Xh4.6774@read1.cgocable.net>, says...
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
How can you know? It must be tough to watch and listen to the debate while giving
blow jobs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Riley The Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
05 Oct 2004 09:16:12 PM |
|
|
"£ÅrÐŧ§" <lardassa@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bcd1dddbad0286a9897bf@news.individual.net...
In article <koI8d.19541$Xh4.6774@read1.cgocable.net>, says...
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
How can you know? It must be tough to watch and listen to the debate
while giving
blow jobs.
Dear Lardass,
I wouldn't know about the blowjobs. Are you speaking from experience
on how challenging it is?
BTW, Let us know when you can chew gum and walk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
05 Oct 2004 09:24:51 PM |
|
|
Riley The Dog, <woof@wag.com>, the idle, airheaded ***** flogger, and
unskilled farm worker, declaimed:
Dear Lardass,
I wouldn't know about the blowjobs.
Never had one, huh?
--
Hideous Haiku:
piercing Private sore fool
fishhook puddles nightmare girls
miser gatekeepers
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
05 Oct 2004 09:51:03 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:05:59 -0400, "Riley The Dog" <woof@wag.com>
wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
LOL, Old ***** had to admit to everyone that Iraq had nothing to do
with 9/11 and pretended that he had never implied otherwise.
Sounds like he was kicked pretty bad when he had to back off his
number one lie.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
05 Oct 2004 09:16:20 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:05:59 -0400, "Riley The Dog" <woof@wag.com>
wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
They both seem to be lying through their teeth. But I wouldn't mind
meeting Edwards in a dark alley, but is there anything Cheney would
not say or do?
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Holden McGroyne" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
06 Oct 2004 03:41:25 PM |
|
|
They both seem to be lying through their teeth. But I wouldn't mind
meeting Edwards in a dark alley, but is there anything Cheney would
not say or do?
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
06 Oct 2004 05:01:12 PM |
|
|
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
When the US actually puts forth some "liberal" candidates, we'll keep your
advice in mind. However since the Democratic Party in the US is far, far to the
right of the Conservative Party in Britain I don't think we're going to have to
worry on that account. Most of the major Democratic candidates for the
Presidency in the US are so extremist right-wing that they make Thatcher look
like a card-carrying Red.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank F. Matthews" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
06 Oct 2004 10:53:16 PM |
|
|
Holden McGroyne wrote:
They both seem to be lying through their teeth. But I wouldn't mind
meeting Edwards in a dark alley, but is there anything Cheney would
not say or do?
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
As if the most liberal candidate were anything farther left than right
of center in europe.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
06 Oct 2004 04:17:52 PM |
|
|
On 6 Oct 2004 13:41:25 -0700, (Holden
McGroyne) wrote:
They both seem to be lying through their teeth. But I wouldn't mind
meeting Edwards in a dark alley, but is there anything Cheney would
not say or do?
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
Amen. But be prepared to be blasted by the mindless leftwing wackos
that patrol here. My wife is Swedish and I have seen the effects of
it there with the krona going from 4 to the dollar (on a par with the
DM at the time) in 1966 to about half that know--and that's with a
weak dollar.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam Albright" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
06 Oct 2004 04:57:52 PM |
|
|
On 6 Oct 2004 13:41:25 -0700, (Holden
McGroyne) wrote:
They both seem to be lying through their teeth. But I wouldn't mind
meeting Edwards in a dark alley, but is there anything Cheney would
not say or do?
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
Like the UK?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Holden McGroyne" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
07 Oct 2004 10:01:41 AM |
|
|
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
Like the UK?
Exactly. The only reason we are not further down the toilet is our ability
to control immigration. Something America appears either unable or unwilling
to deal with.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
07 Oct 2004 10:47:59 AM |
|
|
On 7 Oct 2004 08:01:41 -0700, (Holden
McGroyne) wrote:
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
Like the UK?
Exactly. The only reason we are not further down the toilet is our ability
to control immigration. Something America appears either unable or unwilling
to deal with.
America can't manage without immigration. Its own people won't do the
things poor immigrants will, and its education system isn't producing
enough scientists and technologists because high-school science has
been emasculated.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank F. Matthews" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
07 Oct 2004 03:26:52 PM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On 7 Oct 2004 08:01:41 -0700, (Holden
McGroyne) wrote:
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
Like the UK?
Exactly. The only reason we are not further down the toilet is our ability
to control immigration. Something America appears either unable or unwilling
to deal with.
America can't manage without immigration. Its own people won't do the
things poor immigrants will, and its education system isn't producing
enough scientists and technologists because high-school science has
been emasculated.
High school science is doing fine thank you. The problem is that most
of the kids who are willing to work are the children of immigrants.
That's why we need the immigrants. We also need some high end
scientists to help fill out the classes left empty by kids who would
rather make money. They are training to be corporate lawyers and
accountants.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
06 Oct 2004 05:49:21 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:57:52 -0500, Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:
On 6 Oct 2004 13:41:25 -0700, (Holden
McGroyne) wrote:
They both seem to be lying through their teeth. But I wouldn't mind
meeting Edwards in a dark alley, but is there anything Cheney would
not say or do?
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and in a
cell.
As a resident of the UK - who travels quite a bit in the US due to my
work - I would caution American voters about their liberal candidates.
Living in a country considered a postcard for socialism, allow me to
tell you that such does not work very well. Although it is very expensive
and requires vast regulating. Once your country reaches that point you
will become another second world has-been.
Like the UK?
No. like France moron.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Baldur" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
05 Oct 2004 11:04:09 PM |
|
|
In article <t7l6m0hn27cqdfa1jtfjiitu793esdi2ia@4ax.com>
Eris <vithant01@nospamcomcast.net> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:05:59 -0400, "Riley The Dog"
<woof@wag.com>
wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration
and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s licking wee Johnnie's *****.
They both seem to be lying through their teeth. But I wouldn't
mind
meeting Edwards in a dark alley, but is there anything Cheney
would
not say or do?
I don't think ether one is kicking the others *****, they are
both very
polished, in different ways. I want Cheney out of office and
in a
cell.
I agree that ***** Cheney isn't the embarassment to America that
George Bush was.
But he's obviously quite thoroughly divorced from reality.
He must think Americans can't see what's happening in Iraq or in
the USA on TV.
The 'Big Lie' doesn't work in the modern world.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Progressive with an Attitude" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
06 Oct 2004 11:54:23 AM |
|
|
Riley The Dog wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
Wow. A right winger who speaks French. I would call the debate the donut
man vs. the matinee idol. Edwards clearly did better with undecided
voters than Cheney. Check out the CBS poll.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Middlestat" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
07 Oct 2004 10:28:56 AM |
|
|
Wow. A right winger who speaks French. I would call the debate the donut
man vs. the matinee idol. Edwards clearly did better with undecided
voters than Cheney. Check out the CBS poll.
And there is no chance that CBS would produce poll results which could
be considered biased. Interesting that those who scream about Fox News
take as gospel anything which is reported from the Big Three.
My concern with the Democratic ticket is due, in part, to the following:
July 15, 2004
WorldDaily.Com
The Democratic Socialists of America Political Action Committee is
officially urging its members to work strongly for the election of
John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election.
The largest socialist organization in the U.S. the DSA is affiliated
with Socialist International, a federation of the world's socialist,
social democratic and labor parties. It was founded as a group dedica-
ted to moving the Democratic Party to the political left, and towards
this end has worked closely with the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
Frank Llewellyn, national director of the DSA, stated that it has been
a century since a major party candidate for president had such strong
support for the principle goals of his organization ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sven Paderkksson" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
08 Oct 2004 11:40:09 AM |
|
|
My concern with the Democratic ticket is due, in part, to the following:
July 15, 2004
WorldDaily.Com
The Democratic Socialists of America Political Action Committee is
officially urging its members to work strongly for the election of
John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election.
Having raised in a country with Socialism as the form of government,
I cannot understand how anyone would want more government control
and regulation.
I find it interesting that in any country support for expanding government
comes always from the elite of entertainment and media. Who have the
financial resource to make certain they do not have to live with either
the expense or inconvenience of the government controls they so actively
support.
Are Americans aware that George Soros does not enjoy such popular support
from much of Europe? And no one who I know would support a candidate who
is funded by Soros. Is anyone in America asking what benefits Soros will
gain if his candidate is elected? Soros does nothing which does not
benefit Soros. Ask how popular Soros is in a country in Europe where he
used his finances to devalue currency for his own profit. Do you Americans
know that the euro currency plan received much popular support because such
a european currency limited the ability of Soros or one like him to continue
to manipulate the money markets? I think your press does not much report
on this.
* and thanks to friend Gary who helped me with some of the English words.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
08 Oct 2004 05:03:10 PM |
|
|
On 8 Oct 2004 09:40:09 -0700, (Sven Paderkksson)
wrote:
My concern with the Democratic ticket is due, in part, to the following:
July 15, 2004
WorldDaily.Com
The Democratic Socialists of America Political Action Committee is
officially urging its members to work strongly for the election of
John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election.
Having raised in a country with Socialism as the form of government,
I cannot understand how anyone would want more government control
and regulation.
I find it interesting that in any country support for expanding government
comes always from the elite of entertainment and media.
You will have to be more specific there. I don't agree with this
statement at all.
Who have the
financial resource to make certain they do not have to live with either
the expense or inconvenience of the government controls they so actively
support.
Are Americans aware that George Soros does not enjoy such popular support
from much of Europe? And no one who I know would support a candidate who
is funded by Soros. Is anyone in America asking what benefits Soros will
gain if his candidate is elected? Soros does nothing which does not
benefit Soros. Ask how popular Soros is in a country in Europe where he
used his finances to devalue currency for his own profit. Do you Americans
know that the euro currency plan received much popular support because such
a european currency limited the ability of Soros or one like him to continue
to manipulate the money markets? I think your press does not much report
on this.
* and thanks to friend Gary who helped me with some of the English words.
Perhaps you are unaware that Mr. Bush has made huge increases to our
government - much more than liberal presidents and that most of the
jobs he has created have been government jobs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jerry Johnson" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
09 Oct 2004 11:54:53 AM |
|
|
(Kate ) wrote in message news:<416a0cbb.28898468@news-west.newscene.com>...
On 8 Oct 2004 09:40:09 -0700, (Sven Paderkksson)
wrote:
I find it interesting that in any country support for expanding government
comes always from the elite of entertainment and media.
You will have to be more specific there. I don't agree with this
statement at all.
Perhaps the writer has noticed that the media and entertainment professions
in western nations - Europe included - predominately favor the political
left. You may disagree with such an assessment, but it will be a very
difficult one to disprove.
I found it interesting that various super-wealthy rockers are screaming
for universal health care. Granted a noble idea, although not one in
which any wealthy individual would be expected to participate. You
believe you might see Bruce, Dave, or John spending half their day in a
waiting room? Don't bet on it. Although it is perfectly acceptable that
these same individuals demand that the rest of the population be mandatory
participants in such a program.
I also agree with the comments of an earlier writer to this sub-thread,
that politically Kerry is at the extreme left. Since I regard the vast
majority of LBJ's Great Society programs to be outright failures, why would
I support someone with this same philosophy to occupancy of the Whitehouse?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
10 Oct 2004 10:37:56 AM |
|
|
On 9 Oct 2004 09:54:53 -0700, (Jerry Johnson)
wrote:
cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote in message news:<416a0cbb.28898468@news-west.newscene.com>...
On 8 Oct 2004 09:40:09 -0700, (Sven Paderkksson)
wrote:
I find it interesting that in any country support for expanding government
comes always from the elite of entertainment and media.
You will have to be more specific there. I don't agree with this
statement at all.
Perhaps the writer has noticed that the media and entertainment professions
in western nations - Europe included - predominately favor the political
left. You may disagree with such an assessment, but it will be a very
difficult one to disprove.
No, he said that support for expanding the government always comes
from the media and entertainment.
You made the assumption that expanding the government is part of a
liberal agenda and only part of a liberal agenda, therefore expanding
the government is the same thing as a liberal agenda.
Neither is very true.
Liberals support less social laws and more regulations that protect
group assets, such as environment, individual rights and safety and
security.
Conservative support more social laws, and little or no regulations to
protect group assets.
Libertarians support pretty much no laws for everything.
Neo conservatives make lots of laws that promote favoritism for
specific corporation and support removing laws that these corporations
want removed. (Bush)
I found it interesting that various super-wealthy rockers are screaming
for universal health care. Granted a noble idea, although not one in
which any wealthy individual would be expected to participate. You
believe you might see Bruce, Dave, or John spending half their day in a
waiting room? Don't bet on it. Although it is perfectly acceptable that
these same individuals demand that the rest of the population be mandatory
participants in such a program.
Uh, rockers aren't born to their fame. They grew up in the same way
you did. Not to mention, universal health care is already in force.
No hospital is allowed to turn away someone who can't find emergency
care anywhere else. You pay for it in higher hospital fees. It's far
more cost effective for everyone that people without health care take
care of their problems before they become emergency room cases. You
are already a mandatory partipant in the program whether you like it
or not.
Apparently rockers have more common sense and care more about their
fellow countrymen than you.
I also agree with the comments of an earlier writer to this sub-thread,
that politically Kerry is at the extreme left. Since I regard the vast
majority of LBJ's Great Society programs to be outright failures, why would
I support someone with this same philosophy to occupancy of the Whitehouse?
LOL. You need to do more research.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sven Paderkksson" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
11 Oct 2004 12:29:08 PM |
|
|
No, he said that support for expanding the government always
comes from the media and entertainment.
You made the assumption that expanding the government is part
of a liberal agenda and only part of a liberal agenda, therefore
expanding the government is the same thing as a liberal agenda.
Neither is very true.
Liberals support less social laws and more regulations that protect
group assets, such as environment, individual rights and safety and
security.
I must disagree. Do you believe that an increase in regulation
must equals an increase in personal liberty? Not from what I have
witnessed personally.
The advantage of being raised and educated in other country is that
one can study the governments of other nations without the filter of
political bias. For example, when I began studying in the US I
was surprised by how little American knew about the social policies
started by your FD Roosevelt and expanded by LB Johnson and J Carter.
In my former classwork professors would use this to model how the US
was turning towards socialism as a political system. And, as socialism
gained, there would be a decline in the status of the US as a world
economic power. Which is the circimstance when a government controls
a larger increase in the means of production and distribution. As I
have told US students, your Bill Gates or Sam Wal-Mart would not have
happened in most of Europe. Because of the restrictive regulation
system which is in place. And where free enterprise without extensive
government control is not possible.
In my earlier message I questioned why a US voter would select
someone who would move them closer to this political system. A rise
in the economic power of a more united europe and more unified asia
is corresponding to a decrease in the US. If it not to late to
reverse this trend, in the next thirty years the US will drop into
the category of a second world nation. And your status of living
will be equal to what is now the circimstance in eastern europe.
Apparently rockers have more common sense and care more about their
fellow countrymen than you.
Several years back we faced with a taxation raise which we were
told was in order to meet continued medical needs. Our popular
entertainment people spoke out often in favor of this. Only after
did we learn that none of those so in favor of these changes would
be so effected. As they always go elsewhere for their medical needs,
and often to the US. I see that entertainment people in the US do
likewise in their support of a cause or candidate. They can not be
expected to personally experience the results of what they support.
(Yes, even if they did not grow up as wealthy.)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jerry Johnson" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
11 Oct 2004 12:20:07 PM |
|
|
I also agree with the comments of an earlier writer to this sub-thread,
that politically Kerry is at the extreme left. Since I regard the vast
majority of LBJ's Great Society programs to be outright failures, why would
I support someone with this same philosophy to occupancy of the Whitehouse?
LOL. You need to do more research.
LOL, you evidently know nothing of the programs enacted by LBJ. Or that
Ted Kennedy and his clone Kerry support the expansion of these failed
programs.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
07 Oct 2004 02:10:42 PM |
|
|
Wow. A right winger who speaks French. I would call the debate the donut
man vs. the matinee idol. Edwards clearly did better with undecided
voters than Cheney. Check out the CBS poll.
And there is no chance that CBS would produce poll results which could
be considered biased. Interesting that those who scream about Fox News
take as gospel anything which is reported from the Big Three.
CBS? The company whose CEO publicly endorsed Bush for president two weeks ago?
Now I know you commie-loving Republicans live on lies but usually you're not
this blatant.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110005669
Guess Who's a GOP Booster?
The CEO of CBS's parent company endorses President Bush.
Friday, September 24, 2004 12:01 a.m. EDT
With the scandal at CBS still festering, questions are being raised about
whether a felony was committed when the network broadcast apparently forged
memos in an attempt to discredit George W. Bush. Yesterday, the chairman of
CBS's parent company chose Hong Kong as a place to drop a little bomb. Sumner
Redstone, who calls himself a "liberal Democrat," said he's supporting
President Bush.
The chairman of the entertainment giant Viacom said the reason was simple:
Republican values are what U.S. companies need. Speaking to some of America's
and Asia's top executives gathered for Forbes magazine's annual Global CEO
Conference, Mr. Redstone declared: "I look at the election from what's good for
Viacom. I vote for what's good for Viacom. I vote, today, Viacom.
"I don't want to denigrate Kerry," he went on, "but from a Viacom standpoint,
the election of a Republican administration is a better deal. Because the
Republican administration has stood for many things we believe in, deregulation
and so on. The Democrats are not bad people. . . . But from a Viacom
standpoint, we believe the election of a Republican administration is better
for our company."
Sharing the stage with Mr. Redstone was Steve Forbes, CEO, president and editor
in chief of Forbes and a former Republican presidential aspirant, who quipped:
"Obviously you're a very enlightened CEO."
Mr. Redstone's unexpected declaration came at a time when an unwelcome
spotlight is directed at him and his board because of the CBS airing of what
everyone now believes was a fake memo alleging that Mr. Bush shirked his duties
three decades ago in the Texas Air National Guard. On Tuesday, Republican
National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie alleged a leftist bias at Viacom.
While it was well known that Mary Mapes, the producer who did most of the
reporting on the memos, is a liberal, and that anchorman Dan Rather, has always
been much tougher on Republicans, the Viacom board had heretofore remained in
the background.
Mr. Gillespie said, "This demonstrates a serious lack of judgment separate and
apart from the lack of judgment demonstrated in running a report based on
discredited documents. Did this producer's own political viewpoint cloud her
judgment? Is CBS News's decision to neither suspend nor release the producer in
question a result of judgment clouded by Viacom and CBS owner Sumner Redstone's
role as a Kerry fundraiser, or Viacom President Tom Freston's public support of
John Kerry for President?"
Mr. Redstone's office immediately went into overdrive, denying on Wednesday
that he's a raised funds for the Democratic presidential nominee. Then came
yesterday's "I vote Republican" vow in Hong Kong.
It was all the more surprising because the Boston-born Mr. Redstone was
co-chairman of Edmund Muskie's presidential campaign in 1972. He's also a close
friend of the other Massachusetts senator, Ted Kennedy. Monday's New York Sun,
quoting the Federal Election Commission, said that since 1998 Mr. Redstone had
given $50,000 to the Democratic Party. He's also donated the maximum $2,000 to
the Kerry campaign, after supporting Al Gore in 2000.
======================
What surprises me about this is that Viacom just got nailed with a $550,000
fine for the Super Bowl "wardrobe malfunction," something which they had no
control over. I am not entirely certain how Redstone sees this strict
totalitarian government regulation of his business as being healthy for his
company and I cannot see why he would support a president and an administration
which wants to put even more rigid federal controls on his industry. What next?
Maybe Bush wants to set the colors of the buffs on Survivor?
If I were on Viacom's board and I heard my CEO make statements like this, I
would begin looking for a replacement.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
06 Oct 2004 04:12:10 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:54:23 GMT, Progressive with an Attitude
<eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Riley The Dog wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
Wow. A right winger who speaks French. I would call the debate the donut
man vs. the matinee idol. Edwards clearly did better with undecided
voters than Cheney. Check out the CBS poll.
Oooh! CBS! 2/3 X CBS = BS. What forgeries have they used here? Hot
bed of credibility that network is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jenn" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
07 Oct 2004 04:50:42 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:54:23 GMT, Progressive with an Attitude
<eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Riley The Dog wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
Wow. A right winger who speaks French. I would call the debate the donut
man vs. the matinee idol. Edwards clearly did better with undecided
voters than Cheney. Check out the CBS poll.
Oooh! CBS! 2/3 X CBS = BS. What forgeries have they used here? Hot
bed of credibility that network is.
at least they didn't take the US to war and get 1000 plus Americans
alone killed over blatantly forged 'yellow cake' uranium documents
I suspect Rove provided the documents since they have so artfully
distracted attention from the fact that the CBS report was accurate
about Bush's behavior at the time [even the secretary who typed the
documents for Killian said that while she didn't type those, she typed
some that said the same thing]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
07 Oct 2004 09:14:05 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:12:10 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:54:23 GMT, Progressive with an Attitude
<eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Riley The Dog wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
Wow. A right winger who speaks French. I would call the debate the donut
man vs. the matinee idol. Edwards clearly did better with undecided
voters than Cheney. Check out the CBS poll.
Oooh! CBS! 2/3 X CBS = BS. What forgeries have they used here? Hot
bed of credibility that network is.
Well yes they do have more credibility now. They made a mistake and
they owned up to it. That's what you expect honest people to do.
duh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Lingo" |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
07 Oct 2004 09:30:02 PM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:4173f714.169278906@news-west.newscene.com...
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:12:10 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:54:23 GMT, Progressive with an Attitude
<eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Riley The Dog wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
Wow. A right winger who speaks French. I would call the debate the donut
man vs. the matinee idol. Edwards clearly did better with undecided
voters than Cheney. Check out the CBS poll.
Oooh! CBS! 2/3 X CBS = BS. What forgeries have they used here? Hot
bed of credibility that network is.
Well yes they do have more credibility now. They made a mistake and
they owned up to it. That's what you expect honest people to do.
duh.
It took them over a week and Dan Rather still claims they are not forgeries.
The only reason CBS admitted it is because they felt pressured into it from
all of the press against them. They HAD to verify them or admit they were
frauds! Had the pressure not been there, they probably would have never
owned up!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Edwards beats the Old ***** to a Pulp! |
08 Oct 2004 09:32:05 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 02:30:02 GMT, "Johnny Lingo"
<johnnylingo@spammenot.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:4173f714.169278906@news-west.newscene.com...
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:12:10 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:54:23 GMT, Progressive with an Attitude
<eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Riley The Dog wrote:
"Colin Powell" <*****.cheney@sucks.*****.*****> wrote in message
news:Y32GNBHO38265.8710763889@anonymous.poster...
What a humongous embarassment for the Bush administration and their
Neo-Nazi Party!
<Other Similar "Nazi" Nonsense Snipped>
Oh contraire my short peckered friend.
*****'s kicking wee Johnnie's *****.
Wow. A right winger who speaks French. I would call the debate the donut
man vs. the matinee idol. Edwards clearly did better with undecided
voters than Cheney. Check out the CBS poll.
Oooh! CBS! 2/3 X CBS = BS. What forgeries have they used here? Hot
bed of credibility that network is.
Well yes they do have more credibility now. They made a mistake and
they owned up to it. That's what you expect honest people to do.
duh.
It took them over a week and Dan Rather still claims they are not forgeries.
The only reason CBS admitted it is because they felt pressured into it from
all of the press against them. They HAD to verify them or admit they were
frauds! Had the pressure not been there, they probably would have never
owned up!
Oh Bull hockey. The memos were verified by the contents, not the form
which no one expected to be a problem if the contents were verified.
The contents are still verified - and the timing was appropriate for
Rather to get an admission from the source that the form was not
original. And one wonders why this might be true, unless someone was
trying to take CBS to make them look bad.
The point was and still is on the contents which have been verified
and still are.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
