| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"maff" |
| Date: |
16 Nov 2005 01:33:36 AM |
| Object: |
E=mc2 |
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
.
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 11:22:35 AM |
|
|
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
#442. www.video2cd.co.uk. Your 8mm films on DVD.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dylan" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
17 Nov 2005 03:57:17 AM |
|
|
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
But we know that a matter-antimatter bomb is possible and feasible.
--Dylan
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
#442. www.video2cd.co.uk. Your 8mm films on DVD.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
19 Nov 2005 02:06:47 AM |
|
|
Dylan wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
But we know that a matter-antimatter bomb is possible and feasible.
--Dylan
Indeed, not making a bomb is the hard part ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dylan" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
19 Nov 2005 03:31:02 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Dylan wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
But we know that a matter-antimatter bomb is possible and feasible.
--Dylan
Indeed, not making a bomb is the hard part ;-)
The most powerful thermonuclear bomb in existance is the hydrogen
fusion bomb. Yet, by Einstein's equation E=MC^2, the resulting
explosion, awesome as it is, converts only about 0.7% of the mass
involved into energy. A matter-antimatter bomb, on the other hand,
converts 100%. 100%/0.7%=142.9. Hence the matter-antimatter bomb
releases more than 140 times as much energy, gram for gram, as the most
powerful bomb now in existance.
Dylan, a pro-evolution creationist
Uncommon sense trumps common sense every time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert J. Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
19 Nov 2005 12:50:29 PM |
|
|
Dylan wrote:
The most powerful thermonuclear bomb in existance is the hydrogen
fusion bomb. Yet, by Einstein's equation E=MC^2, the resulting
explosion, awesome as it is, converts only about 0.7% of the mass
involved into energy. A matter-antimatter bomb, on the other hand,
converts 100%. 100%/0.7%=142.9. Hence the matter-antimatter bomb
releases more than 140 times as much energy, gram for gram, as the most
powerful bomb now in existance.
Antimatter is very hard to make and to store which is why we do not have
antimatter bombs.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dylan" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
20 Nov 2005 06:24:12 AM |
|
|
Robert J. Kolker wrote:
Dylan wrote:
The most powerful thermonuclear bomb in existance is the hydrogen
fusion bomb. Yet, by Einstein's equation E=MC^2, the resulting
explosion, awesome as it is, converts only about 0.7% of the mass
involved into energy. A matter-antimatter bomb, on the other hand,
converts 100%. 100%/0.7%=142.9. Hence the matter-antimatter bomb
releases more than 140 times as much energy, gram for gram, as the most
powerful bomb now in existance.
Antimatter is very hard to make and to store which is why we do not have
antimatter bombs.
Bob Kolker
And so therefore we will never have antimatter bombs in the future?
--Dylan
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
17 Nov 2005 12:53:36 AM |
|
|
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
Well that's easy! First collect a kilo of antimatter....
Mark.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Wilkins" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
17 Nov 2005 01:23:35 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
Well that's easy! First collect a kilo of antimatter....
Mark.
What does one collect antimatter in? A Klein bottle?
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
"Darwin's theory has no more to do with philosophy than any other
hypothesis in natural science." Tractatus 4.1122
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dylan" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
17 Nov 2005 04:03:38 AM |
|
|
John Wilkins wrote:
m.richardson@utas.edu.au wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
Well that's easy! First collect a kilo of antimatter....
Mark.
What does one collect antimatter in? A Klein bottle?
A Penning trap. --Dylan
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
"Darwin's theory has no more to do with philosophy than any other
hypothesis in natural science." Tractatus 4.1122
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
21 Nov 2005 04:57:39 AM |
|
|
John Wilkins wrote:
m.richardson@utas.edu.au wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
Well that's easy! First collect a kilo of antimatter....
Mark.
What does one collect antimatter in? A Klein bottle?
Yes! Do not put you antimatter in a Deirty bottle!
Klein it real good first.
8-)
Mark.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
21 Nov 2005 05:45:41 AM |
|
|
On 20 Nov 2005 20:57:39 -0800, wrote:
John Wilkins wrote:
wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
Well that's easy! First collect a kilo of antimatter....
Mark.
What does one collect antimatter in? A Klein bottle?
Yes! Do not put you antimatter in a Deirty bottle!
Klein it real good first.
8-)
Mark.
You got very close to suggesting a "Deity" bottle...
But all they can hold is anti-reality.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eros" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
17 Nov 2005 03:07:53 AM |
|
|
John Wilkins wrote:
m.richardson@utas.edu.au wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
Well that's easy! First collect a kilo of antimatter....
Mark.
What does one collect antimatter in? A Klein bottle?
No... a Clayton's bottle.
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
"Darwin's theory has no more to do with philosophy than any other
hypothesis in natural science." Tractatus 4.1122
EROS.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Friar Broccoli" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
17 Nov 2005 02:02:03 AM |
|
|
John Wilkins wrote:
m.richardson@utas.edu.au wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005 17:33:36 -0800 in alt.atheism, maff ("maff"
<maff91@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
Interesting in its own right.
But what's more interesting is the general perception that E=MC^2 has
something to do with the A and H bombs.
Alas, as yet we can't make a "total conversion" bomb.... But give me
another hour or so....
Well that's easy! First collect a kilo of antimatter....
Mark.
What does one collect antimatter in? A Klein bottle?
Uncle boxes are cheaper.
Friar Broccoli
Robert Keith Elias, Quebec, Canada Email: EliasRK (of) gmail * com
Best programmer's & all purpose text editor: http://www.semware.com
--------- I consider ALL arguments in support of my views ---------
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dylan" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
18 Nov 2005 07:10:52 AM |
|
|
PRODUCTION AND STORAGE OF ANTIPROTONS
Relativistic quantum theory predicts the existence of two types of
elementary particles appearing on an equal footing with respect to the
fundamental equations. Thus, for each particle there exists an
antiparticle having the same mass and spin but opposite electrical
charge. Furthermore, particles and antiparticles can appear or
disappear in pairs, due to the transformation of energy into matter and
vice-versa.
Antiprotons and positrons are probably the only forms of antimatter
that will be able to be fabricated, in substantial quantities, in the
near future. They are produced by accelerating protons (or other
particles) to energies such that, when they collide with a target, a
part of the energy is transformed into particle-antiparticle pairs. In
practice, when using a fixed target, as a function of invested energy,
the maximum antiproton production yield occurs when the protons are
accelerated to an energy of about 120 Gev. Since less than one
collision out of thirty produces an antiproton, and since the mass of
an antiproton corresponds to only 0.94 GeV, the energy efficiency is
very poor. From this point of view, a better solution would be to use a
collider-ring in which the antiprotons would be produced by the head-on
collisions of protons turning in opposite directions. In theory, an
even higher yield could be obtained if conditions similar to the
original "Big Bang" could be recreated in the laboratory, conditions in
which proton-antiproton production becomes spontaneous. Such conditions
might be found in quark-gluon plasmas, which could be produced in
high-energy heavy-ion collisions, which are presently the subject of
intense research [C].
Once the antiprotons are created (with a whole spectrum of velocities
and directions), the following step consists of capturing them before
they interact with matter. This is a problem much more difficult to
resolve than that of production. It took almost thirty years before a
solution was found at CERN. This required the invention of "stochastic
cooling", a technique to decrease the width of the antiproton velocity
distribution (see La Recherche April 1984 p.508-511). It is then
possible to concentrate the collected antiprotons into a very small
beam, to accumulate them in storage rings, and finally slow them down
to energies such that they can be brought to a standstill in
electromagnetic traps.
In a Penning trap, particles are radially confined by a magnetic
field, and axially by an electrostatic field. A cylindrical trap of
this type served as host during the recent experiments at CERN in which
antiprotons were bottled for the first time. It also trapped
continuously a single electron for more than ten months at the
University of Washington. To store antiprotons for years, one needs a
vacuum better than 10-18 torr. This is obtainable only in enclosures
that are sealed (after filling) and cooled to the temperature of liquid
helium. It is therefore practically impossible to measure the vacuum
level, so that doing the experiment itself is the only way to verify
the technique. If this method is successful, it will be possible to
make transportable bottles with a capacity of 1012 to 1013 antiprotons
[E].
Then the decisive stage for the practical applications of antimatter
will begin: will it be possible to develop adequate simple and compact
storage techniques? For this, two major approaches are being
considered. The first consists of making antihydrogen by combining
antiprotons with positrons, and then trying to form solid antihydrogen
pellets which could be stored and manipulated with the help of various
electromagnetic and optical levitation techniques. Very high storage
densities would be obtained, but only in cryogenic enclosures and
extremely good vacuums.
The most appealing approach would be to store the antiprotons in
ordinary matter. In fact, if all antimatter particles have a tendency
to spontaneously annihilate when coming into contact with matter (be it
the effects of electromagnetic attraction in the case of positrons and
antiprotons, or van der Waals forces for antihydrogen), the existence
of metastable states of antiprotons in condensed matter can not be
ruled out a priori [F]. For example, if a very low energy antihydrogen
atom is diffused into a solid, it moves about until its positron
annihilates with an electron. The antiproton may then take the place of
this electron, and under some conditions, remain confined at certain
points within the crystalline structure. At present the kind of
substance to be used isn't known, but an enormous variety of chemical
compounds and crystal types are available for the search of an optimum
material.
Other less obvious solutions could still be discovered. For example,
antiprotons might, as electrons do when placed in liquid helium, form a
bubble at the center of which they could subsist indefinitely [F].
Also, similar to the electron pairs responsible for superconductivity,
antiprotons might possibly form Cooper pairs if placed in a metal,
becoming thereby unable to lose kinetic energy by shock, and thus to
annihilate.
SOURCE: Antimatter weapons
by Andre Gsponer and Jean-Pierre Hurni
http://cui.unige.ch/isi/sscr/phys/antim-BPP.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
18 Nov 2005 10:39:54 AM |
|
|
On 17 Nov 2005 23:10:52 -0800, "Dylan" <desertmountainholy@yahoo.com>
wrote:
PRODUCTION AND STORAGE OF ANTIPROTONS
Relativistic quantum theory predicts the existence of two types of
elementary particles appearing on an equal footing with respect to the
fundamental equations. Thus, for each particle there exists an
antiparticle having the same mass and spin but opposite electrical
charge. Furthermore, particles and antiparticles can appear or
disappear in pairs, due to the transformation of energy into matter and
vice-versa.
Antiprotons and positrons are probably the only forms of antimatter
that will be able to be fabricated, in substantial quantities, in the
near future. They are produced by accelerating protons (or other
:
Utter tommy-rot.
Anti-neutrinos are produced in the billions, every second, in nuclear
reactors.
Go back to school.
Do not pass GO.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dylan" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
18 Nov 2005 04:11:58 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
On 17 Nov 2005 23:10:52 -0800, "Dylan" <desertmountainholy@yahoo.com>
wrote:
PRODUCTION AND STORAGE OF ANTIPROTONS
Relativistic quantum theory predicts the existence of two types of
elementary particles appearing on an equal footing with respect to the
fundamental equations. Thus, for each particle there exists an
antiparticle having the same mass and spin but opposite electrical
charge. Furthermore, particles and antiparticles can appear or
disappear in pairs, due to the transformation of energy into matter and
vice-versa.
Antiprotons and positrons are probably the only forms of antimatter
that will be able to be fabricated, in substantial quantities, in the
near future. They are produced by accelerating protons (or other
:
Utter tommy-rot.
Anti-neutrinos are produced in the billions, every second, in nuclear
reactors.
Go back to school.
Do not pass GO.
Sorry your tummy rots so utterly. Sob sob sob. The context of this
article unmistakably indicates fabrication in order to make
matter-antimatter weapons. Neutrinos are not used to fabricate weapons,
much less antineutrinos. Incidentally, I am in school -- the school
of lifetime learning. Sorry you seem to have chosen truancy and are
stuck at GO.
Dylan, a pro-evolution creationist
Uncommon sense trumps common sense every time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
19 Nov 2005 03:16:17 AM |
|
|
On 18 Nov 2005 08:11:58 -0800, "Dylan" <desertmountainholy@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Michael Gray wrote:
On 17 Nov 2005 23:10:52 -0800, "Dylan" <desertmountainholy@yahoo.com>
wrote:
PRODUCTION AND STORAGE OF ANTIPROTONS
Relativistic quantum theory predicts the existence of two types of
elementary particles appearing on an equal footing with respect to the
fundamental equations. Thus, for each particle there exists an
antiparticle having the same mass and spin but opposite electrical
charge. Furthermore, particles and antiparticles can appear or
disappear in pairs, due to the transformation of energy into matter and
vice-versa.
Antiprotons and positrons are probably the only forms of antimatter
that will be able to be fabricated, in substantial quantities, in the
near future. They are produced by accelerating protons (or other
:
Utter tommy-rot.
Anti-neutrinos are produced in the billions, every second, in nuclear
reactors.
Go back to school.
Do not pass GO.
Sorry your tummy rots so utterly. Sob sob sob. The context of this
"Tommy" not "tummy"
Remedial reading class for you.
article unmistakably indicates fabrication in order to make
matter-antimatter weapons. Neutrinos are not used to fabricate weapons,
The statement is a clear assertion, unrelated the context.
My statement still stands.
More remedial reading for you, young lad.
much less antineutrinos. Incidentally, I am in school -- the school
of lifetime learning. Sorry you seem to have chosen truancy and are
stuck at GO.
I suppose you have a science degree, and are qualified to comment?
Or does your "school of hard knocks", not give out such
qualifications?
Dylan, a pro-evolution creationist
Ah, that explains it.
"creationist".
A self-admitted non-scientific mind, replacing rational thought with
superstition, and so proud of the fact, that you declare it out loud.
Uncommon sense trumps common sense every time.
*****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dylan" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
18 Nov 2005 11:02:13 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
On 17 Nov 2005 23:10:52 -0800, "Dylan" <desertmountainholy@yahoo.com>
wrote:
PRODUCTION AND STORAGE OF ANTIPROTONS
Relativistic quantum theory predicts the existence of two types of
elementary particles appearing on an equal footing with respect to the
fundamental equations. Thus, for each particle there exists an
antiparticle having the same mass and spin but opposite electrical
charge. Furthermore, particles and antiparticles can appear or
disappear in pairs, due to the transformation of energy into matter and
vice-versa.
Antiprotons and positrons are probably the only forms of antimatter
that will be able to be fabricated, in substantial quantities, in the
near future. They are produced by accelerating protons (or other
:
Utter tommy-rot.
Anti-neutrinos are produced in the billions, every second, in nuclear
reactors.
Go back to school.
Do not pass GO.
The context of this article unmistakably indicates fabrication in order
to make matter-antimatter weapons. Neutrinos are not used to fabricate
weapons, much less antineutrinos. Incidentally, I am in school ---
the school of lifetime learning -- and hope you are as well.
Dylan, a pro-evolution creationist
Uncommon sense trumps common sense every time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
19 Nov 2005 01:55:37 AM |
|
|
Dylan wrote:
The context of this article unmistakably indicates fabrication in order
to make matter-antimatter weapons. Neutrinos are not used to fabricate
weapons, much less antineutrinos.
They should be used. Those babies will just go straight through you.
:-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
19 Nov 2005 03:16:50 AM |
|
|
On 18 Nov 2005 17:55:37 -0800, wrote:
Dylan wrote:
The context of this article unmistakably indicates fabrication in order
to make matter-antimatter weapons. Neutrinos are not used to fabricate
weapons, much less antineutrinos.
They should be used. Those babies will just go straight through you.
:-)
Just like everything else does, it seems.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 01:55:06 AM |
|
|
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1132104816.572353.238960@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
WOW!
You mean only atheists are privy to this equation?
And to think I mistook murder for homicide.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jesus Sucks" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 02:02:08 AM |
|
|
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in message
news:Vjwef.2463$zb4.6852@news.uswest.net...
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1132104816.572353.238960@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
WOW!
You mean only atheists are privy to this equation?
And to think I mistook murder for homicide.
WOW, aren't you going to say Einstein's theory of realitivity is not
science? It's just a theory. You are pathetic.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 02:12:27 AM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Richard Dawkins
(Dawkins@Hell.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1132104816.572353.238960@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
WOW!
You mean only atheists are privy to this equation?
The only way you could come up with this moronic faux-paux would be if
you read only the URL, and didn't bother to open it. Are you always this
dishonest, Ray? Don't answer, we know you are.
And to think I mistook murder for homicide.
Idiot.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
----
"GARGOYLES, PSYCHICS, EVERYTHING UNGODLY, GET THE HELL OUT OF MY
HOUSE, IN JESUS NAME I PRAY. THE DARK SIDE, SHE's NOT A CHRISTIAN,
SHE'S DARK-SIDED, SHE'S DARK-SIDED, THIS IS MY HOUSE, I WANT MY GOD
AND I WANT MY FAMILY. I AM A GOD WARRIOR SHE'S A SPIRITUAL WARRIOR,
SHE WAS THROWN IN THE PITS, OH NO THE HORRORS"
Ain't Christianity great?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 02:08:59 PM |
|
|
Uncle Vic wrote:
----
"GARGOYLES, PSYCHICS, EVERYTHING UNGODLY, GET THE HELL OUT OF MY
HOUSE, IN JESUS NAME I PRAY. THE DARK SIDE, SHE's NOT A CHRISTIAN,
SHE'S DARK-SIDED, SHE'S DARK-SIDED, THIS IS MY HOUSE, I WANT MY GOD
AND I WANT MY FAMILY. I AM A GOD WARRIOR SHE'S A SPIRITUAL WARRIOR,
SHE WAS THROWN IN THE PITS, OH NO THE HORRORS"
Ain't Christianity great?
Google tells me that this is a memorable moment from "Trading Spouses".
Should I commit it to memory in case it comes up in a future "Quotable
Quotes" game?
Is it this year's "ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US." ("WHAT YOU
SAY!!")
But actual mental illness isn't really particularly funny.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
17 Nov 2005 02:48:03 AM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet
() made the light shine upon us with this:
Uncle Vic wrote:
----
"GARGOYLES, PSYCHICS, EVERYTHING UNGODLY, GET THE HELL OUT OF MY
HOUSE, IN JESUS NAME I PRAY. THE DARK SIDE, SHE's NOT A CHRISTIAN,
SHE'S DARK-SIDED, SHE'S DARK-SIDED, THIS IS MY HOUSE, I WANT MY GOD
AND I WANT MY FAMILY. I AM A GOD WARRIOR SHE'S A SPIRITUAL WARRIOR,
SHE WAS THROWN IN THE PITS, OH NO THE HORRORS"
Ain't Christianity great?
Google tells me that this is a memorable moment from "Trading Spouses".
Should I commit it to memory in case it comes up in a future "Quotable
Quotes" game?
How can anyone forget it?
Is it this year's "ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US." ("WHAT YOU
SAY!!")
Yup. I saw an episode of Futurama that made use of that phrase...
But actual mental illness isn't really particularly funny.
Christianity is mental illness, and it's hilarious.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
----
"GARGOYLES, PSYCHICS, EVERYTHING UNGODLY, GET THE HELL OUT OF MY
HOUSE, IN JESUS NAME I PRAY. THE DARK SIDE, SHE's NOT A CHRISTIAN,
SHE'S DARK-SIDED, SHE'S DARK-SIDED, THIS IS MY HOUSE, I WANT MY GOD
AND I WANT MY FAMILY. I AM A GOD WARRIOR SHE'S A SPIRITUAL WARRIOR,
SHE WAS THROWN IN THE PITS, OH NO THE HORRORS"
Ain't Christianity great?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dylan" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 07:28:57 AM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1132104816.572353.238960@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
WOW!
You mean only atheists are privy to this equation?
Precisely! For you it's E=MC^2+G, G=God. --Dylan
And to think I mistook murder for homicide.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 05:08:17 PM |
|
|
On 15 Nov 2005 23:28:57 -0800, "Dylan" <desertmountainholy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1132104816.572353.238960@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
WOW!
You mean only atheists are privy to this equation?
Precisely! For you it's E=MC^2+G, G=God. --Dylan
....And "G", is not only an imaginary number, but also a VARIABLE.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert J. Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 05:16:39 PM |
|
|
Dubh Ghall wrote:
...And "G", is not only an imaginary number, but also a VARIABLE.
1 + 1 = 2 for sufficiently small values of 1.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Forrest" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 09:55:32 AM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1132104816.572353.238960@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
WOW!
You mean only atheists are privy to this equation?
Well, as you use the word "atheist" to mean "scientist", in your
useage, yes.
For the people who understand the difference, no.
And to think I mistook murder for homicide.
A sentence well up to your normal standards of irrelevance and
incoherence.
RF
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Forrest" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 10:04:44 AM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1132104816.572353.238960@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/b97ded249f35b870
WOW!
You mean only atheists are privy to this equation?
Well, as you use the word "atheist" to mean "scientist", in your
useage, yes.
For the people who understand the difference, no.
And to think I mistook murder for homicide.
A sentence well up to your normal standards of irrelevance and
incoherence.
RF
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "thissteve" |
|
| Title: Re: E=mc2 |
16 Nov 2005 10:21:17 AM |
|
|
maff wrote:
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
E=mc2
D'oh! Still no program on G=8pT. That's the one I need the most help
on.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
