| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Joe" |
| Date: |
29 Dec 2007 07:26:43 PM |
| Object: |
(Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
Read it via http://Muvy.org
.
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 10:35:01 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:27:03 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
My thought exactly. What is *your* problem (with religion) and why
do *I* have to listen to it?
How about, "Because you are posting to an atheist NG"?
The question was a weaseling non-response after he had got atheism
wrong and arrogantly refused to be corrected.
Yep.
I have never understood why so many theists in America do this. I
think I only ever saw this twice in forty-odd years in England.
I think it is primarily usenet xtians, that do it.
They want to provoke anger.
I think that the reasoning is that anger proves that atheists are in
some way inferior, OTOH, an angry xtian, is the embodiment of the
holey spirit, or some such
However, even they wouldn't be so stupid as to try it on your door
step, so they do it here, instead.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 10:51:18 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:35:01 GMT, Dubh Ghall <puck@pooks.hill.fey>
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:27:03 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
My thought exactly. What is *your* problem (with religion) and why
do *I* have to listen to it?
How about, "Because you are posting to an atheist NG"?
The question was a weaseling non-response after he had got atheism
wrong and arrogantly refused to be corrected.
Yep.
I have never understood why so many theists in America do this. I
think I only ever saw this twice in forty-odd years in England.
I think it is primarily usenet xtians, that do it.
They want to provoke anger.
I've seen it regularly in the real world since I emigrated to the USA.
I think that the reasoning is that anger proves that atheists are in
some way inferior, OTOH, an angry xtian, is the embodiment of the
holey spirit, or some such
However, even they wouldn't be so stupid as to try it on your door
step, so they do it here, instead.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 01:29:15 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:51:18 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
I have never understood why so many theists in America do this. I
think I only ever saw this twice in forty-odd years in England.
I think it is primarily usenet xtians, that do it.
They want to provoke anger.
I've seen it regularly in the real world since I emigrated to the USA.
Of course, in America, they are allowed to carry guns, which no doubt
makes them braver.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 01:01:00 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:30:36 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
In article <p89in3h0pus4q7ba7urt9srphrdpam0rgl@4ax.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:00 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
In article <jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
In article
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:26 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it. But, Ill
tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a wayward faith-based
secular religion if you choose to.
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you
must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What is it with you in-our-face, arrogantly nasty liars?
Well?
What part of "we know what our own point of view is perfectly well"
are you too stupid to understand?
Well?
What are you pretending we have to be agnostic about?
Well?
Why do you imagine the theist's inside-their-religion presumptions
have any relevance in the rest of the world beyond it?
Well?
Why is it so difficult for you in-denial sociopaths to allow us to be
what we actually are?
Well?
Or for you to grasp the sheer irrelevance of your hypothetical
belief-object to people who outside your religion?
Well?
My thought exactly. What is *your* problem (with religion) and why
do *I* have to listen to it?
So why did you lie about atheists in an atheist newsgroup?
My problem is with lying psychopaths like you who insist you know our
POV better than we do ourselves.
.
|
|
|
| User: "krw" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 01:34:13 PM |
|
|
In article <kvein3l168c4ns4t8ocui3hb1tqidvb7r4@4ax.com>,=20
misc.consumers, says...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:30:36 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
=20
In article <p89in3h0pus4q7ba7urt9srphrdpam0rgl@4ax.com>,=20
misc.consumers, says...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:00 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
=20
In article <jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,=20
misc.consumers, says...
In article=20
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>=
,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
=20
On Dec 29, 7:26=A0pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
=20
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it. But, Ill
tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a wayward faith-base=
d
secular religion if you choose to.
=20
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?=20
=20
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you=20
must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
=20
What is it with you in-our-face, arrogantly nasty liars?
=20
Well?
Asked and answered.
What part of "we know what our own point of view is perfectly well"
are you too stupid to understand?
=20
Well?
Asked and answered.
=20
What are you pretending we have to be agnostic about?
=20
Well?
Asked and answered.
Why do you imagine the theist's inside-their-religion presumptions
have any relevance in the rest of the world beyond it?
=20
Well?
Asked and answered.
=20
Why is it so difficult for you in-denial sociopaths to allow us to be
what we actually are?
=20
Well?
Asked and answered.
=20
Or for you to grasp the sheer irrelevance of your hypothetical
belief-object to people who outside your religion?=20
=20
Well?
Asked and answered.
My thought exactly. What is *your* problem (with religion) and why=20
do *I* have to listen to it?
=20
So why did you lie about atheists in an atheist newsgroup?
I'm not lying. You must be stupid as a stump, as well as ignorant=20
as a stone.
=20
My problem is with lying psychopaths like you who insist you know our
POV better than we do ourselves.
You obviously don't. It's not a matter of POV. You are=20
*obviously*, by your actions in this thread, in the state of active=20
(dis)belief.
--=20
Keith
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 02:25:36 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:34:13 -0500, in alt.atheism
krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote in
<MPG.21e30e41664ff4c19897d9@news.individual.net>:
In article <kvein3l168c4ns4t8ocui3hb1tqidvb7r4@4ax.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:30:36 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
In article <p89in3h0pus4q7ba7urt9srphrdpam0rgl@4ax.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:00 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
In article <jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
In article
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:26 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it. But, Ill
tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a wayward faith-based
secular religion if you choose to.
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you
must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What is it with you in-our-face, arrogantly nasty liars?
Well?
Asked and answered.
What part of "we know what our own point of view is perfectly well"
are you too stupid to understand?
Well?
Asked and answered.
What are you pretending we have to be agnostic about?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Why do you imagine the theist's inside-their-religion presumptions
have any relevance in the rest of the world beyond it?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Why is it so difficult for you in-denial sociopaths to allow us to be
what we actually are?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Or for you to grasp the sheer irrelevance of your hypothetical
belief-object to people who outside your religion?
Well?
Asked and answered.
My thought exactly. What is *your* problem (with religion) and why
do *I* have to listen to it?
So why did you lie about atheists in an atheist newsgroup?
I'm not lying. You must be stupid as a stump, as well as ignorant
as a stone.
My problem is with lying psychopaths like you who insist you know our
POV better than we do ourselves.
You obviously don't. It's not a matter of POV. You are
*obviously*, by your actions in this thread, in the state of active
(dis)belief.
You refuse to admit that you don't know the meanings of 'atheism' and
'agnosticism'. How can you discuss anything with us if you are so
unwilling to correct such fundamental errors?
--
"... There's glory for you."
"I don't know what you mean by 'glory,'" Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiles contemptuously. "Of course you don't--till
I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
"But glory doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument," Alice objected.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,
"it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice "whether you can make words mean so
many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master--that's
all."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 01:51:50 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:34:13 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
In article <kvein3l168c4ns4t8ocui3hb1tqidvb7r4@4ax.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:30:36 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
In article <p89in3h0pus4q7ba7urt9srphrdpam0rgl@4ax.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:00 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzz> wrote:
In article <jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
In article
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:26 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it. But, Ill
tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a wayward faith-based
secular religion if you choose to.
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you
must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What is it with you in-our-face, arrogantly nasty liars?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Where, liar?
You lied about atheists to our faces.
What part of "we know what our own point of view is perfectly well"
are you too stupid to understand?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Where, liar?
You lied about atheists to our faces.
What are you pretending we have to be agnostic about?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Where, liar?
Why do you imagine the theist's inside-their-religion presumptions
have any relevance in the rest of the world beyond it?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Where, liar?
Why is it so difficult for you in-denial sociopaths to allow us to be
what we actually are?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Where, liar?
Or for you to grasp the sheer irrelevance of your hypothetical
belief-object to people who outside your religion?
Well?
Asked and answered.
Where, liar?
My thought exactly. What is *your* problem (with religion) and why
do *I* have to listen to it?
So why did you lie about atheists in an atheist newsgroup?
I'm not lying. You must be stupid as a stump, as well as ignorant
as a stone.
Yes you are, liar.
The only one "ignorant as a stone", is yourself - who rudely and
stupidly told atheists what our POV "really" was based on presumptions
that are only granted inside theistic religion.
And nastily refused to be corrected.
My problem is with lying psychopaths like you who insist you know our
POV better than we do ourselves.
You obviously don't. It's not a matter of POV. You are
*obviously*, by your actions in this thread, in the state of active
(dis)belief.
Why do you keep lying?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 11:19:09 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:00 -0500, krw wrote:
In article <jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
In article
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:26Â pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it. But, Ill
tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a wayward faith-based
secular religion if you choose to.
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you must).
A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
Wrong.
Try reading Huxley someday.
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
âWe move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and
glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach
their heart's desire at last, and the White House will
be adorned by a downright moron.â
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David V." |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 11:46:18 AM |
|
|
krw wrote:
In article
<jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
In article
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:26 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it.
But, Ill tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a
wayward faith-based secular religion if you choose to.
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if
you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
Of course we expect morons like you to get that wrong. Why do you
have this dire need to lie about Atheists? And who the ***** are
you that YOU get to define Atheists in a way that is different
from the way Atheists define themselves?
--
Dave
You measure a democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents,
not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
- Abbie Hoffman
.
|
|
|
| User: "krw" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 12:32:46 PM |
|
|
In article <1JWdnYsQR7N2t-TanZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@sti.net>,
misc.consumers, says...
krw wrote:
In article
<jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
In article
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:26 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it.
But, Ill tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a
wayward faith-based secular religion if you choose to.
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if
you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
Of course we expect morons like you to get that wrong. Why do you
have this dire need to lie about Atheists? And who the ***** are
you that YOU get to define Atheists in a way that is different
from the way Atheists define themselves?
Um, I'm not the liar here. I've got nothing wrong, and indeed have
stepped all over your toes, apparently. Thanks for being such a
thin-skinned idiot, for we already knew about the "idiot" part.
--
Keith
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 08:19:33 PM |
|
|
krw wrote:
In article <jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
In article
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:26 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it. But, Ill
tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a wayward faith-based
secular religion if you choose to.
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you
must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
Do you even know what the word "agnosticism" means? Might want to look
it up in a couple dictionaries and form a consensus opinion across them.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act *
* of the whole American people which declared that *
* their legislature should make no law respecting *
* an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the *
* free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of *
* separation between church and state." *
* --Thomas Jefferson, 1802 *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 11:21:02 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:19:33 -0800, DanielSan wrote:
krw wrote:
In article <jhachmann-8258D6.00094331122007@news.giganews.com>,
misc.consumers, says...
In article
<9b0ad579-7c24-439f-9ccb-20bf1dfea408@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:26 pm, Joe <useful_in...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read it viahttp://Muvy.org
REPLY: If you follow atheism, then i dont respect it. But, Ill
tolerate it because youre entitled to follow a wayward faith-based
secular religion if you choose to.
Why don't you learn what atheism is before you knock it?
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you must).
A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
Do you even know what the word "agnosticism" means?
I'll take "No" for 200...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"You believe in a book that has talking animals, wizards,
witches, demons, sticks turning into snakes, food falling
from the sky, people walking on water, and all sorts of magical,
absurd and primitive stories, and you say that *we* are the
ones that need help?" - Jon Stoll
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charles & Mambo Duckman" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 06:45:52 PM |
|
|
krw wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you
must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on a couch for that?
--
Come down off the cross
We can use the wood
Tom Waits, Come On Up To The House
.
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
31 Dec 2007 09:10:28 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:45:52 -0800, Charles & Mambo Duckman <duckman@gfy.slf> wrote:
krw wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you
must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on a couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Goren" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 04:43:03 PM |
|
|
Apostate wrote:
Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote:
krw wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if
you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on a
couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Cheers,
b&
--
EAC Memographer
BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy
``All but God can prove this sentence true.''
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles & Mambo Duckman" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 08:36:38 PM |
|
|
Ben Goren wrote:
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Well, I don't want to brag, but... oh, wait, that's a *d*.
--
Come down off the cross
We can use the wood
Tom Waits, Come On Up To The House
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Goren" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
02 Jan 2008 07:37:09 AM |
|
|
Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Well, I don't want to brag, but... oh, wait, that's a *d*.
How many chicks could the Duckman ***** if the Duckman were a duck?
Cheers,
b&
--
EAC Memographer
BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy
``All but God can prove this sentence true.''
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles & Mambo Duckman" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
02 Jan 2008 06:16:10 PM |
|
|
Ben Goren wrote:
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Well, I don't want to brag, but... oh, wait, that's a *d*.
How many chicks could the Duckman ***** if the Duckman were a duck?
Are you suggesting I am some sort of a canard pedophile?
--
Come down off the cross
We can use the wood
Tom Waits, Come On Up To The House
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
03 Jan 2008 10:49:31 AM |
|
|
"Charles & Mambo Duckman" <duckman@gfy.slf> wrote in message
news:YoKdnUdiDP3UtOHanZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@comcast.com...
Ben Goren wrote:
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Well, I don't want to brag, but... oh, wait, that's a *d*.
How many chicks could the Duckman ***** if the Duckman were a duck?
Are you suggesting I am some sort of a canard pedophile?
Goddamnit, you owe me a keyboard ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles & Mambo Duckman" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
04 Jan 2008 12:03:01 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Well, I don't want to brag, but... oh, wait, that's a *d*.
How many chicks could the Duckman ***** if the Duckman were a duck?
Are you suggesting I am some sort of a canard pedophile?
Goddamnit, you owe me a keyboard ;)
Jesus, Robyn, can't you use Kleenex like the rest of us?
--
Come down off the cross
We can use the wood
Tom Waits, Come On Up To The House
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
04 Jan 2008 10:47:05 AM |
|
|
"Charles & Mambo Duckman" <duckman@gfy.slf> wrote in message
news:kNGdnUqNcLiIUeDanZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@comcast.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Well, I don't want to brag, but... oh, wait, that's a *d*.
How many chicks could the Duckman ***** if the Duckman were a duck?
Are you suggesting I am some sort of a canard pedophile?
Goddamnit, you owe me a keyboard ;)
Jesus, Robyn, can't you use Kleenex like the rest of us?
Well, yeah, but where's the fun in that? :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
02 Jan 2008 06:17:21 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:16:10 -0800, Charles & Mambo Duckman
<duckman@gfy.slf> wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Well, I don't want to brag, but... oh, wait, that's a *d*.
How many chicks could the Duckman ***** if the Duckman were a duck?
Are you suggesting I am some sort of a canard pedophile?
You've just had a quack up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
03 Jan 2008 07:51:02 AM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:16:10 -0800, Charles & Mambo Duckman
<duckman@gfy.slf> wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
Well, I don't want to brag, but... oh, wait, that's a *d*.
How many chicks could the Duckman ***** if the Duckman were a duck?
Are you suggesting I am some sort of a canard pedophile?
You've just had a quack up.
His feathers have been ruffled.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 05:34:16 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:43:03 -0700, Ben Goren <ben@trumpetpower.com> wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote:
krw wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if
you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on a
couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
And jive, I have little doubt. :-)
Cheers,
b&
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Goren" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 05:46:00 PM |
|
|
Apostate wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote:
krw wrote:
johac wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if
you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on
a couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
And jive, I have little doubt. :-)
Aw, no, man. I know the dude, and he don't give us no jive -- he
talks /straight,/ I tell ya.
Cheers,
b&
--
EAC Memographer
BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy
``All but God can prove this sentence true.''
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 05:52:02 PM |
|
|
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote:
krw wrote:
johac wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if
you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on
a couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
And jive, I have little doubt. :-)
Aw, no, man. I know the dude, and he don't give us no jive -- he
talks /straight,/ I tell ya.
"Excuse me, stewardess. I speak jive."
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act *
* of the whole American people which declared that *
* their legislature should make no law respecting *
* an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the *
* free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of *
* separation between church and state." *
* --Thomas Jefferson, 1802 *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Goren" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 06:09:30 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote:
krw wrote:
johac wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god"
if you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit
on a couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
And jive, I have little doubt. :-)
Aw, no, man. I know the dude, and he don't give us no jive --
he talks /straight,/ I tell ya.
"Excuse me, stewardess. I speak jive."
Smo fo buttah layin' to the bone, jackin' me up...tightly!
Cheers,
b&
--
EAC Memographer
BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy
``All but God can prove this sentence true.''
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 06:04:40 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:52:02 -0800, DanielSan <petersonj07@comcast.net> wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote:
krw wrote:
johac wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if
you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on
a couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
And jive, I have little doubt. :-)
Aw, no, man. I know the dude, and he don't give us no jive -- he
talks /straight,/ I tell ya.
"Excuse me, stewardess. I speak jive."
Oh, *****. I don't watch enough movies.
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 06:18:36 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:04:40 -0500, Apostate
<godless.*****@yeehaw.org.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:52:02 -0800, DanielSan <petersonj07@comcast.net> wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Ben Goren wrote:
Apostate wrote:
Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote:
krw wrote:
johac wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of
story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if
you must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on
a couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
Yeah, but can the man duck?
And jive, I have little doubt. :-)
Aw, no, man. I know the dude, and he don't give us no jive -- he
talks /straight,/ I tell ya.
"Excuse me, stewardess. I speak jive."
Oh, *****. I don't watch enough movies.
Barbara Billingsley a.k.a. June Cleaver, and totally unexpected.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charles & Mambo Duckman" |
|
| Title: Re: (Essay:) I Don't Respect Your Religion, by Cenk Uygur. |
01 Jan 2008 03:52:08 PM |
|
|
Apostate wrote:
Atheism is simply lack of belief in gods. Period. End of story.
No, it's the active disbelief in a superior being ("god" if you
must). A lack of belief would be agnosticism.
What would "passive" disbelief look like? Do I have to sit on a couch for that?
You certainly can't Mambo.
Good one :-)
--
Come down off the cross
We can use the wood
Tom Waits, Come On Up To The House
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
