| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"No One" |
| Date: |
31 Mar 2004 11:41:07 PM |
| Object: |
Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
It seems a bunch of San Jose's Evangelical residents want to recall
the mayor and the city council (or most of it) over a same-sex
marriage flap. The city passed a law giving married same-sex couples
the same benefits given to other married city employees *provided*
that the marriages are determined to be legal by the courts. Mostly
the additional benefits are things like not having to wait until an
"open enrollment" period before coverage starts - things married
couples take for granted. The "Christians" are apparently a rather
hateful and mean spirited lot - in some cases the people being
denied immediate coverage are adopted children.
Not all Christians are pleased with these antics and are getting tired
of these Evangelicals trying to speak for them. But we know which
"Christians" George Bush is supporting, and he probably doesn't
realize how many votes he'll lose over it.
.
|
|
| User: "Lawrence Seib" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
08 Apr 2004 05:03:59 PM |
|
|
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in
alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from a
mainstream church to start their own church under the ***** excuse
of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was a
"magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is write a
book about that special pineapple and get at least 150 people to believe
me to make it into a religion. The fact that it is a plain old pineapple
is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat" via
standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what else is
'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could. But I
would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be incredibly funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it
was still alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the
Cat first, and then everything will become quite clear.
Larry
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
09 Apr 2004 04:10:32 PM |
|
|
On 8 Apr 2004 15:03:59 -0700, (Lawrence Seib),
Message ID: <75ab6396.0404081403.3638cdc@posting.google.com> wrote in
alt.atheism;
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in
alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from a
mainstream church to start their own church under the ***** excuse
of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was a
"magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is write a
book about that special pineapple and get at least 150 people to believe
me to make it into a religion. The fact that it is a plain old pineapple
is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat" via
standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what else is
'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could. But I
would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be incredibly funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it
was still alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the
Cat first, and then everything will become quite clear.
I'm sure John would have, if the opportunity had presented itself.
Larry
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
08 Apr 2004 06:31:34 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:03:59 -0700, (Lawrence
Seib) wrote in message
news:<75ab6396.0404081403.3638cdc@posting.google.com>:
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in
alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from a
mainstream church to start their own church under the *****
excuse of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes
mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was a
"magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is write
a book about that special pineapple and get at least 150 people to
believe me to make it into a religion. The fact that it is a plain
old pineapple is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat"
via standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what
else is 'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could. But
I would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be incredibly
funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it was still
alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the Cat first,
and then everything will become quite clear.
Larry
ROFL!!! Absolutely! Did you happen to see the thread where he made up a
verse from the book of Bruce? It starts here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
--
Lurlean Lie #14:
Sometimes the ground opens up beneath gay bars and swallows them clean up.
news:7908c278.0402181855.34315917@posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Poster Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
08 Apr 2004 06:47:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:03:59 -0700, (Lawrence
Seib) wrote in message
news:<75ab6396.0404081403.3638cdc@posting.google.com>:
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in
alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from a
mainstream church to start their own church under the *****
excuse of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes
mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was a
"magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is write
a book about that special pineapple and get at least 150 people to
believe me to make it into a religion. The fact that it is a plain
old pineapple is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat"
via standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what
else is 'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could. But
I would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be incredibly
funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it was still
alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the Cat first,
and then everything will become quite clear.
Larry
ROFL!!! Absolutely! Did you happen to see the thread where he made up a
verse from the book of Bruce? It starts here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
Don't forget the verses about the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch!
And the Lord spake, saying, 'First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin.
Then, shalt thou count to three. No more. No less. Three shalt be the
number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be
three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting
that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number
three, being the third number, be reached, then, lobbest thou thy Holy
Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My
sight, shall snuff it.'
Monty Python's Quest for the Holy Grail
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
08 Apr 2004 07:32:37 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:47:13 -0400, Poster Boy <PosterBoy@localhost.com>
wrote in message news:<ulob70d1avd107ap2kcs207m23t02uhs0q@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:03:59 -0700, (Lawrence
Seib) wrote in message
news:<75ab6396.0404081403.3638cdc@posting.google.com>:
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote
in message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote
in alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from
a mainstream church to start their own church under the
***** excuse of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes
mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was
a "magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is
write a book about that special pineapple and get at least 150
people to believe me to make it into a religion. The fact that it
is a plain old pineapple is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat"
via standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what
else is 'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could.
But I would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be
incredibly funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it was still
alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the Cat first,
and then everything will become quite clear.
Larry
ROFL!!! Absolutely! Did you happen to see the thread where he made up
a verse from the book of Bruce? It starts here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
Don't forget the verses about the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch!
And the Lord spake, saying, 'First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin.
Then, shalt thou count to three. No more. No less. Three shalt be the
number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three.
Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that
thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three,
being the third number, be reached, then, lobbest thou thy Holy Hand
Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight,
shall snuff it.'
Monty Python's Quest for the Holy Grail
"One...two...five!"
"Three, sir!"
"Three!"
(Angels singing)
BOOM
--
Lurlean Lie #12:
Homo's are all play and no work. They get jobs only to recruit and gather
support from other deviants such as your whores and dope addicts.
news:7908c278.0312061629.623c571@posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
09 Apr 2004 04:14:38 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:32:37 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.00.32.35.436439@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:47:13 -0400, Poster Boy <PosterBoy@localhost.com>
wrote in message news:<ulob70d1avd107ap2kcs207m23t02uhs0q@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:03:59 -0700, (Lawrence
Seib) wrote in message
news:<75ab6396.0404081403.3638cdc@posting.google.com>:
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote
in message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote
in alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from
a mainstream church to start their own church under the
***** excuse of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes
mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was
a "magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is
write a book about that special pineapple and get at least 150
people to believe me to make it into a religion. The fact that it
is a plain old pineapple is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat"
via standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what
else is 'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could.
But I would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be
incredibly funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it was still
alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the Cat first,
and then everything will become quite clear.
Larry
ROFL!!! Absolutely! Did you happen to see the thread where he made up
a verse from the book of Bruce? It starts here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
Don't forget the verses about the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch!
And the Lord spake, saying, 'First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin.
Then, shalt thou count to three. No more. No less. Three shalt be the
number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three.
Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that
thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three,
being the third number, be reached, then, lobbest thou thy Holy Hand
Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight,
shall snuff it.'
Monty Python's Quest for the Holy Grail
"One...two...five!"
"Three, sir!"
"Three!"
(Angels singing)
BOOM
Don't forget to 'Google' on "holy round meal." :))))
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
09 Apr 2004 06:51:11 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:14:38 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<2h4e70p8pd2kka66hnt54pfclol8lif5lf@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:32:37 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.00.32.35.436439@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:47:13 -0400, Poster Boy <PosterBoy@localhost.com>
wrote in message news:<ulob70d1avd107ap2kcs207m23t02uhs0q@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:03:59 -0700, (Lawrence
Seib) wrote in message
news:<75ab6396.0404081403.3638cdc@posting.google.com>:
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote
in message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote
in alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from
a mainstream church to start their own church under the
***** excuse of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes
mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was
a "magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is
write a book about that special pineapple and get at least 150
people to believe me to make it into a religion. The fact that it
is a plain old pineapple is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat"
via standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what
else is 'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could.
But I would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be
incredibly funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it was still
alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the Cat first,
and then everything will become quite clear.
Larry
ROFL!!! Absolutely! Did you happen to see the thread where he made up
a verse from the book of Bruce? It starts here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
Don't forget the verses about the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch!
And the Lord spake, saying, 'First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin.
Then, shalt thou count to three. No more. No less. Three shalt be the
number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three.
Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that
thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three,
being the third number, be reached, then, lobbest thou thy Holy Hand
Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight,
shall snuff it.'
Monty Python's Quest for the Holy Grail
"One...two...five!"
"Three, sir!"
"Three!"
(Angels singing)
BOOM
Don't forget to 'Google' on "holy round meal." :))))
ROTFL!!!
--
Funny Lurlean quote #34:
"I hope a piece of the sun falls directly on Baghdad and burns it all up."
--Lurlean provides her own commentary to the lyrics "Re, a drop of golden sun"
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
10 Apr 2004 12:41:57 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 23:51:11 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.23.51.08.413008@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:14:38 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<2h4e70p8pd2kka66hnt54pfclol8lif5lf@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:32:37 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.00.32.35.436439@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
(snip)
Monty Python's Quest for the Holy Grail
"One...two...five!"
"Three, sir!"
"Three!"
(Angels singing)
BOOM
Don't forget to 'Google' on "holy round meal." :))))
ROTFL!!!
I thought that would be your reaction... :)
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
09 Apr 2004 04:13:33 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.08.23.31.29.711564@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:03:59 -0700, (Lawrence
Seib) wrote in message
news:<75ab6396.0404081403.3638cdc@posting.google.com>:
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in
alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from a
mainstream church to start their own church under the *****
excuse of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes
mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was a
"magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is write
a book about that special pineapple and get at least 150 people to
believe me to make it into a religion. The fact that it is a plain
old pineapple is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat"
via standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what
else is 'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could. But
I would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be incredibly
funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it was still
alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the Cat first,
and then everything will become quite clear.
Larry
ROFL!!! Absolutely! Did you happen to see the thread where he made up a
verse from the book of Bruce? It starts here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
/quote
Oh and Jason "only one error in the KJV" Gastrich is free to play too."
/quote
The single error starts with the first word
and ends with the last..... :))
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
09 Apr 2004 06:57:32 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:13:33 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<ae4e709p339v6c20ac6gc87epkvjnknef2@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.08.23.31.29.711564@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:03:59 -0700, (Lawrence
Seib) wrote in message
news:<75ab6396.0404081403.3638cdc@posting.google.com>:
Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org>...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in
alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from a
mainstream church to start their own church under the *****
excuse of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes
mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was a
"magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is write
a book about that special pineapple and get at least 150 people to
believe me to make it into a religion. The fact that it is a plain
old pineapple is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat"
via standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what
else is 'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could. But
I would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be incredibly
funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
This is just great! I wish I had seen the thread while it was still
alive. They should have added that you must beleive in the Cat first,
and then everything will become quite clear.
Larry
ROFL!!! Absolutely! Did you happen to see the thread where he made up a
verse from the book of Bruce? It starts here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
/quote
Oh and Jason "only one error in the KJV" Gastrich is free to play too."
/quote
The single error starts with the first word
and ends with the last..... :))
Hahaha! Yeah, I've "debated" Jason Gastrich, myself, and know exactly how
he can be. When he lost the argument, he offered to debate someone over
the telephone, then when nobody took him up on it he proclaimed victory.
--
Q. How many people with ADD does it take to change a light bulb?
A. Let's go ride a bike.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
10 Apr 2004 12:43:31 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 23:57:32 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.23.57.28.27706@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:13:33 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<ae4e709p339v6c20ac6gc87epkvjnknef2@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.08.23.31.29.711564@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
(snip)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
/quote
Oh and Jason "only one error in the KJV" Gastrich is free to play too."
/quote
The single error starts with the first word
and ends with the last..... :))
Hahaha! Yeah, I've "debated" Jason Gastrich, myself, and know exactly how
he can be. When he lost the argument, he offered to debate someone over
the telephone, then when nobody took him up on it he proclaimed victory.
He's an amoral and terminally dishonest *****. He even bestowed a PHD
upon himself....(MMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIIRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHH)
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
10 Apr 2004 06:41:34 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:43:31 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<2gcg70ljf34i0212dqevlmbhv1bqjdjmpo@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 23:57:32 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.23.57.28.27706@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:13:33 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<ae4e709p339v6c20ac6gc87epkvjnknef2@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.08.23.31.29.711564@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
(snip)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
/quote
Oh and Jason "only one error in the KJV" Gastrich is free to play
too." /quote
The single error starts with the first word and ends with the
last..... :))
Hahaha! Yeah, I've "debated" Jason Gastrich, myself, and know exactly
how he can be. When he lost the argument, he offered to debate someone
over the telephone, then when nobody took him up on it he proclaimed
victory.
He's an amoral and terminally dishonest *****. He even bestowed a PHD
upon himself....(MMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIIRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHH)
While I was debating him, he started to put a "B.A., M.A." after his name.
Here is my response to that:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=pan.2003.10.17.07.49.02.692825%40postini.spamcon.org
--
Lurlean Lie #10:
I'm sure old Curt-See-Bare (deep throats) all the time.
news:7908c278.0310151920.29215c3f@posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
11 Apr 2004 11:54:37 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:41:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.10.23.41.25.599208@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:43:31 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<2gcg70ljf34i0212dqevlmbhv1bqjdjmpo@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 23:57:32 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.23.57.28.27706@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:13:33 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<ae4e709p339v6c20ac6gc87epkvjnknef2@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.08.23.31.29.711564@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
(snip)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
/quote
Oh and Jason "only one error in the KJV" Gastrich is free to play
too." /quote
The single error starts with the first word and ends with the
last..... :))
Hahaha! Yeah, I've "debated" Jason Gastrich, myself, and know exactly
how he can be. When he lost the argument, he offered to debate someone
over the telephone, then when nobody took him up on it he proclaimed
victory.
He's an amoral and terminally dishonest *****. He even bestowed a PHD
upon himself....(MMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIIRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHH)
While I was debating him, he started to put a "B.A., M.A." after his name.
Here is my response to that:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=pan.2003.10.17.07.49.02.692825%40postini.spamcon.org
LOL...
jason the dingleberry;
It was included to show something important. Homosexuals aren't created
to be homosexuals. They choose to be homosexuals.
bill;
Unfortunately, science is not on your side.
The Bible isn't on his side, either.... :)
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
11 Apr 2004 05:41:01 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 09:54:37 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<ovti709dbomhsdsd8onc4oh5oqijff89er@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:41:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.10.23.41.25.599208@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:43:31 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<2gcg70ljf34i0212dqevlmbhv1bqjdjmpo@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 23:57:32 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.23.57.28.27706@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:13:33 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<ae4e709p339v6c20ac6gc87epkvjnknef2@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.08.23.31.29.711564@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
(snip)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
/quote
Oh and Jason "only one error in the KJV" Gastrich is free to play
too." /quote
The single error starts with the first word and ends with the
last..... :))
Hahaha! Yeah, I've "debated" Jason Gastrich, myself, and know exactly
how he can be. When he lost the argument, he offered to debate
someone over the telephone, then when nobody took him up on it he
proclaimed victory.
He's an amoral and terminally dishonest *****. He even bestowed a
PHD upon
himself....(MMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIIRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHH)
While I was debating him, he started to put a "B.A., M.A." after his
name. Here is my response to that:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=pan.2003.10.17.07.49.02.692825%40postini.spamcon.org
LOL...
I thought you'd like that. :-)
jason the dingleberry;
It was included to show something important. Homosexuals aren't
created to be homosexuals. They choose to be homosexuals.
bill;
Unfortunately, science is not on your side.
The Bible isn't on his side, either.... :)
Nope. Hehehe. :-)
He also challenged me to find 10 Biblical scholars that agree with my
position. When I found 15, he stopped responding to me. Instead, he
whined that everybody was ganging up on him and left the thread by quoting
Bible verses that I had already successfully refuted as not being against
homosexuality.
--
Lurlean Lie #10:
I'm sure old Curt-See-Bare (deep throats) all the time.
news:7908c278.0310151920.29215c3f@posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
12 Apr 2004 09:31:26 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:41:01 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.11.22.40.56.432285@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 09:54:37 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<ovti709dbomhsdsd8onc4oh5oqijff89er@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:41:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.10.23.41.25.599208@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:43:31 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<2gcg70ljf34i0212dqevlmbhv1bqjdjmpo@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 23:57:32 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.09.23.57.28.27706@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:13:33 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<ae4e709p339v6c20ac6gc87epkvjnknef2@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:31:34 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.08.23.31.29.711564@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
(snip)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ujbmv4srmmmuu577j0h0mgs4g9rae8bvc%404ax.com
/quote
Oh and Jason "only one error in the KJV" Gastrich is free to play
too." /quote
The single error starts with the first word and ends with the
last..... :))
Hahaha! Yeah, I've "debated" Jason Gastrich, myself, and know exactly
how he can be. When he lost the argument, he offered to debate
someone over the telephone, then when nobody took him up on it he
proclaimed victory.
He's an amoral and terminally dishonest *****. He even bestowed a
PHD upon
himself....(MMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIIRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHH)
While I was debating him, he started to put a "B.A., M.A." after his
name. Here is my response to that:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=pan.2003.10.17.07.49.02.692825%40postini.spamcon.org
LOL...
I thought you'd like that. :-)
jason the dingleberry;
It was included to show something important. Homosexuals aren't
created to be homosexuals. They choose to be homosexuals.
bill;
Unfortunately, science is not on your side.
The Bible isn't on his side, either.... :)
Nope. Hehehe. :-)
He also challenged me to find 10 Biblical scholars that agree with my
position. When I found 15, he stopped responding to me. Instead, he
whined that everybody was ganging up on him and left the thread by quoting
Bible verses that I had already successfully refuted as not being against
homosexuality.
Figures. Cowardly, ignorant, and dishonest fundy shitheads.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
09 Apr 2004 04:09:40 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:58:58 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.07.16.58.53.60673@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:58:07 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<c79870d82t7noo99q985mu1kk83ucs8383@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:42:25 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>, Message ID:
<pan.2004.04.06.15.42.21.926508@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:42:06 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message news:<cbg5701cr1lpqeof0hpsg4epi8i25rb7mk@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:37:39 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c4s20k$2m4gsb$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in
alt.atheism;
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from a
mainstream church to start their own church under the ***** excuse
of, "I received a revelation".
Give it a few decades and the *****, once again, becomes mainstream.
Yeap, as I said to a friend, if I had a Pineapple and said it was a
"magical and spiritual pineapple", all I would have to do is write a
book about that special pineapple and get at least 150 people to believe
me to make it into a religion. The fact that it is a plain old pineapple
is immaterial.
Indeed, it is. :\
One gentleman in aa defended the 'truth' of "The Cat in the Hat" via
standard xtian apologetics. Xtians were not amused. (what else is
'new?')
Actually, I don't think he has. He has only said that he could. But I
would love to see it, since it sounds like it would be incredibly funny.
He did. A couple of people challenged him on it...it was quite
amusing.... :)
I think I found it. It's at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=msgid%3A9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4%404ax.com
Yes, that's it. I had 'remembered' (wrongly) it was a couple of theists
who had challenged him.
Google link:
news:9i2neu8cb1magncb26rj522jsf81stehm4@4ax.com
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jaonajames" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
04 Apr 2004 01:11:57 AM |
|
|
first stupid ***** poster for a prophylactic shoots for his mouth and tells us
all he knows about American exit polls(nothing). Now dipshit is an expert on
Christians. The fact is Gay marriage will never be a reality in America and
most of the world. In America, 99 of 100 churches will X communicate you for
being gay and that 1 of 100 church that is so called tolerant church is
called a pariah church, usually located in a ghetto area or run by hospice
or salvation army. The few gay Catholic churches are not reconized by Rome.
"Matt" <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:c4o7cd$2ljii4$1@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de...
Poster Boy wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 00:16:37 +1000, Matt
<kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
You don't know how happy I am to know that there are decent
Christians like you. It's unfortunate that the RRR cultists make
Christians
look bad as a group. Christians need more like you to stand up and
speak. I salute you.
Thanks. Honest and normal Christains are fair-minded and
compassionate people, and they want NOTHING to do with the
hateful agendas of the RRR Cult. Unfortunately, they **also**
tend to be very apathetic, and thus they manifest their disdain
for the RRR by simply *ignoring* them. I really don't thin that most
christians have any idea of just how MUCH the RRR cult has
damaged the image of Christianity, both in America, and in much
of the rest of the world -- since the world watches the USA so
closely.
I'll tell you how badly it has damaged the US; people in the middle east
now associate Bill Graham's sons comments about Islam to the views of
the whole population of the US. Where do they make this conclusion? when
a president aligns himself, standing shoulder to shoulder with every
anti-Islamic preacher the US has to offer.
For those who are interested in Islam; The Life of Muhammad is a VERY
good book. It talks about the early part of his life and how he received
his revelations (and his his ministry up until his death with a small
passage about those who continued his work). When you read and look into
the origins of Islam, you start to appreciate that it has a close
relationship with Christianity; even the Vatican has opened up dialogue
with Islamic clerics.
The fact is, the large establish churches like the Church of England and
Catholic Church are opening dialogues to all faiths and working
together, which is a far cry to the so-called Christians who bible thump
and call themselves reverends on the basis that they did a lowly liberal
arts degree in theology (which anyone can do standing on their head).
Matt
Ha! You don't even need that. You can get ordained free
(accessories extra) in a couple of days through the
Universal Life Church at http://www.ulc.net/
"Become Ordained here today and begin your own ministry! As
a legally ordained minister, you may perform weddings,
funerals, baptisms and other functions of the clergy.
In existence since 1959, the Universal Life Church is
headquartered in Modesto, California, and has congregations
around the world. The sun never sets on the Universal Life
Church. ULC ministers come from all walks of life and
spiritual traditions. Our common thread is our adherence to
the universal doctrine of religious freedom:
Do only that which is right.
Every person has the natural right (and the responsibility)
to peacefully determine what is right. We are advocates of
religious freedom.
The Universal Life Church wants you to pursue your spiritual
beliefs without interference from any outside agency,
including government or church authority.
You may become a legally ordained minister for life, without
cost, and without question of faith."
LOL, that explains Phelps.
Mind you, I've always been sceptical of those who peal off from a
mainstream church to start their own church under the ***** excuse
of, "I received a revelation".
Matt
--
http://home.iprimus.com.au/matgarnz
"Atheism is a non-prophet organisation"
"Mays Gilliam didn't attend the 'Rally to Fight Cancer'
last year. Does this mean Mays Gilliam is for Cancer?
A vote for Mays Gilliam is a vote for Cancer." - Head of State
"Baldrick, you are as thick as some extra-clotted clotted
cream that has been left out in the rain by some clot, so
much that you couldn't unclot it with an electric
declotter." - Edmund Blackadder
"I have a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and
call it a weasel!" - Edmund Blackadder
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
04 Apr 2004 01:23:59 AM |
|
|
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> writes:
In America, 99 of 100 churches will X communicate you for being gay
and that 1 of 100 church that is so called tolerant church is called
a pariah church, usually located in a ghetto area or run by hospice
or salvation army.
That is utter nonesense. The Episcopal Church just elected a gay
bishop, and you coudn't do that if 99% of that church opposed it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Poster Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
04 Apr 2004 01:00:07 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 07:23:59 GMT, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net>
wrote:
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> writes:
In America, 99 of 100 churches will X communicate you for being gay
and that 1 of 100 church that is so called tolerant church is called
a pariah church, usually located in a ghetto area or run by hospice
or salvation army.
That is utter nonesense. The Episcopal Church just elected a gay
bishop, and you coudn't do that if 99% of that church opposed it.
I think the fool is going to argue that one church the size of the
Episcopal Church counts the same as one of the (seemingly infinite)
number of branches of southern baptism, etc. As for "pariah church,"
that is the fool's opinion only: in her mind, every church which
differs in any manner whatsoever from her church is automatically a
"pariah church."
Without hate the Reactionary Religious Right KKKultist "churches"
would cease to exist. For this reason, they must constantly seek out
new targets to attack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
04 Apr 2004 05:14:16 AM |
|
|
In article <1zObc.610$SW4.533@news01.roc.ny>,
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
first stupid ***** poster for a prophylactic shoots for his mouth and tells us
all he knows about American exit polls(nothing). Now dipshit is an expert on
Christians. The fact is Gay marriage will never be a reality in America and
most of the world. In America, 99 of 100 churches will X communicate you for
being gay and that 1 of 100 church that is so called tolerant church is
called a pariah church, usually located in a ghetto area or run by hospice
or salvation army. The few gay Catholic churches are not reconized by Rome.
I seem to recall recent news stories about a prominent Christian
denomination electing a gay bishop. Of course that denomination had
differences with Rome long before this recent election.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
04 Apr 2004 03:20:50 AM |
|
|
jaonajames wrote:
first stupid ***** poster for a prophylactic shoots for his mouth and tells us
all he knows about American exit polls(nothing). Now dipshit is an expert on
Christians. The fact is Gay marriage will never be a reality in America and
most of the world. In America, 99 of 100 churches will X communicate you for
being gay and that 1 of 100 church that is so called tolerant church is
called a pariah church, usually located in a ghetto area or run by hospice
or salvation army. The few gay Catholic churches are not reconized by Rome.
Explain why the Jesuits haven't been ex-communicated from the Catholic
church and yet have supported the use of condoms to stop the spread of
aids and have come out in favour of same sex unions to be recognised by
the Catholic Church.
Matt
--
http://home.iprimus.com.au/matgarnz
"Atheism is a non-prophet organisation"
"Mays Gilliam didn't attend the 'Rally to Fight Cancer'
last year. Does this mean Mays Gilliam is for Cancer?
A vote for Mays Gilliam is a vote for Cancer." - Head of State
"Baldrick, you are as thick as some extra-clotted clotted
cream that has been left out in the rain by some clot, so
much that you couldn't unclot it with an electric
declotter." - Edmund Blackadder
"I have a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and
call it a weasel!" - Edmund Blackadder
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
03 Apr 2004 08:09:21 AM |
|
|
Peacenik wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:407851ab.29464948@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 01:38:38 -0500,
Brian E. Clark wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
The "evangelicals," of course, are the RRR cultists... and they
don't even BEGIN to represent the views of **normal**, fair-minded,
tolerant, and sensible Christians, who outnumber them IMMENSELY.
Perhaps so -- but so what?
If you'll pardon the paraphrase: All it takes for Christian
extremism to prosper is that good Christians do nothing.
Precisely. And being well aware of that is one of the reasons
why *this* normal Christian is out here doing **something.**
You don't know how happy I am to know that there are decent Christians like
you. It's unfortunate that the RRR cultists make Christians look bad as a
group. Christians need more like you to stand up and speak. I salute you.
Yeap, but unfortunately when we have GWB on his little crusade doing it
in the name of Christianity whilst aligning himself with Bill Graham's
son, who declared Islam as "evil", one really has to wonder who the real
Christians are and those who merely use Christianity as a uniting
vehicle to push a particular agenda; aka, like Ho Chi Minh used
Nationalism and anti-Imperialism to push his communist agenda, or
Islamic revolution in Iran launched under the guise of anti-Imperialism
and Nationalism.
Matt
--
http://home.iprimus.com.au/matgarnz
"Atheism is a non-prophet organisation"
"Mays Gilliam didn't attend the 'Rally to Fight Cancer'
last year. Does this mean Mays Gilliam is for Cancer?
A vote for Mays Gilliam is a vote for Cancer." - Head of State
"Baldrick, you are as thick as some extra-clotted clotted
cream that has been left out in the rain by some clot, so
much that you couldn't unclot it with an electric
declotter." - Edmund Blackadder
"I have a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and
call it a weasel!" - Edmund Blackadder
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
02 Apr 2004 06:02:13 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:49:40 GMT, (Craig Chilton),
Message ID: <407851ab.29464948@netnews.mchsi.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 01:38:38 -0500,
Brian E. Clark wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
The "evangelicals," of course, are the RRR cultists... and they
don't even BEGIN to represent the views of **normal**, fair-minded,
tolerant, and sensible Christians, who outnumber them IMMENSELY.
Perhaps so -- but so what?
If you'll pardon the paraphrase: All it takes for Christian
extremism to prosper is that good Christians do nothing.
Precisely. And being well aware of that is one of the reasons
why *this* normal Christian is out here doing **something.**
(tip o' the hat)
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
02 Apr 2004 08:39:13 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 16:02:13 -0800,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Brian E. Clark wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
The "evangelicals," of course, are the RRR cultists...
and they don't even BEGIN to represent the views of
**normal**, fair-minded, tolerant, and sensible Christians,
who outnumber them IMMENSELY.
Perhaps so -- but so what?
If you'll pardon the paraphrase: All it takes for Christian
extremism to prosper is that good Christians do nothing.
Precisely. And being well aware of that is one of the reasons
why *this* normal Christian is out here doing **something.**
(tip o' the hat)
Thanks!
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ed Sather" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
01 Apr 2004 10:47:06 AM |
|
|
There was an article awhile back that Barry Goldwater wouldn't be
allowed in the Republican Party. That Barry Goldwater who was the
"original conservative." He was for minimiun govt, lower taxes and
"keep the G** D*** government out of people lives. Per his wife, he
was pro choice, a kiss of death for any protenial republican.
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 10:27:11 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 05:41:07 GMT,
No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
It seems a bunch of San Jose's Evangelical residents want to
recall the mayor and the city council (or most of it) over a same-sex
marriage flap. The city passed a law giving married same-sex couples
the same benefits given to other married city employees *provided*
that the marriages are determined to be legal by the courts. Mostly
the additional benefits are things like not having to wait until an
"open enrollment" period before coverage starts -- things married
couples take for granted. The "Christians" are apparently a rather
hateful and mean spirited lot -- in some cases the people being
denied immediate coverage are adopted children.
Not all Christians are pleased with these antics and are getting tired
of these Evangelicals trying to speak for them. But we know which
"Christians" George Bush is supporting, and he probably doesn't
realize how many votes he'll lose over it.
The "evangelicals," of course, are the RRR cultists... and they
don't even BEGIN to represent the views of **normal**, fair-minded,
tolerant, and sensible Christians, who outnumber them IMMENSELY.
The RRR cult's agendas of hate against women and gays ultimately
WILL go down the Drain of Extinction to join the bones of their first
cousin in bigotry, segregation. All we need to do is to CONTINUE to
shine the spotlight of truth on their hatefulness and hypocrisies. And
they'll shrivel up and crumble into a heap of dust like Dracula caught
in a sunbeam.
As for BUSH... well... the *sig* says it all...
Craig Chilton < >
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
01 Apr 2004 12:48:41 PM |
|
|
There was an article awhile back that Barry Goldwater wouldn't be
allowed in the Republican Party. That Barry Goldwater who was the
"original conservative." He was for minimiun govt, lower taxes and
"keep the G** D*** government out of people lives. Per his wife, he
was pro choice, a kiss of death for any protenial republican.
Goldwater considered the "Religious Right" to be enemies of conservatism and
freedom. When they usurped the Republican Party in the early 1980s, Goldwater,
and the rest of the old-school conservatives became terminally estranged from
the GOP while the big-government, Christian-supremacist theocrats took over the
Party.
Interesting site you might want to read.
http://liberalslikechrist.org/about/goldwater.html
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
02 Apr 2004 05:54:25 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 08:47:06 -0800, Ed Sather <sathered@wvi.com>,
Message ID: <8mgo60hp4gfgl98fi0etsk90vmq5gsn3r6@4ax.com> wrote in
alt.atheism;
There was an article awhile back that Barry Goldwater wouldn't be
allowed in the Republican Party. That Barry Goldwater who was the
"original conservative." He was for minimiun govt, lower taxes and
"keep the G** D*** government out of people lives. Per his wife, he
was pro choice, a kiss of death for any protenial republican.
That's true. And in 1981 Goldwater warned the Congress in a speech on
the floor on what would happen if the Religious Reich ever took over the
Republican party. Sadly, or perhaps fortunately, Barry couldn't
visualize their depths of depravity-he might not have lived as long.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
02 Apr 2004 05:47:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 05:41:07 GMT, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net>,
Message ID: <m3smfotfy4.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in alt.atheism;
It seems a bunch of San Jose's Evangelical residents want to recall
the mayor and the city council (or most of it) over a same-sex
marriage flap. The city passed a law giving married same-sex couples
the same benefits given to other married city employees *provided*
that the marriages are determined to be legal by the courts. Mostly
the additional benefits are things like not having to wait until an
"open enrollment" period before coverage starts - things married
couples take for granted. The "Christians" are apparently a rather
hateful and mean spirited lot - in some cases the people being
denied immediate coverage are adopted children.
Sadly, the Christians with compassion and empathy for others aren't
taking care of their rabid brethen.
Not all Christians are pleased with these antics and are getting tired
of these Evangelicals trying to speak for them. But we know which
"Christians" George Bush is supporting, and he probably doesn't
realize how many votes he'll lose over it.
Why should Bush care? Fundamentalist Republicans control the electronic
voting machines.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
02 Apr 2004 08:50:31 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:47:45 -0800,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
It seems a bunch of San Jose's Evangelical residents want to
recall the mayor and the city council (or most of it) over a same-sex
marriage flap. The city passed a law giving married same-sex couples
the same benefits given to other married city employees *provided*
that the marriages are determined to be legal by the courts. Mostly
the additional benefits are things like not having to wait until an
"open enrollment" period before coverage starts - things married
couples take for granted. The "Christians" are apparently a rather
hateful and mean spirited lot - in some cases the people being
denied immediate coverage are adopted children.
Sadly, the Christians with compassion and empathy for others
aren't taking care of their rabid brethen.
And equally unfortunately, 'WAY too many normal and
unobtrusive Christians don't seem to realize that the continuation
of many of our most fundamental liberties DEPENDS upon our
doing that **very** soon!
Not all Christians are pleased with these antics and are getting tired
of these Evangelicals trying to speak for them. But we know which
"Christians" George Bush is supporting, and he probably doesn't
realize how many votes he'll lose over it.
Why should Bush care? Fundamentalist Republicans control the
electronic voting machines.
To see just HOW critically-important that is, see:
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Evangelicals madder than a hatter in San Jose |
03 Apr 2004 12:32:22 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 02:50:31 G | | | |
