Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship?



 Religions > Atheism > Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Yang, AthD h.c"
Date: 27 Sep 2004 09:35:00 PM
Object: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship?
And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.
"I think Rumsfeld has to take the responsibility there, because he's
the defense secretary and it looks like he didn't have a clue that
this was gonna happen. But, just like a baseball manager, I think he
should take one for the team."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/23/60minutes/main645202.shtml
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1051 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.

User: "Jésus Pépé"

Title: {{{ PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE AMERICA! }}} ==> Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 28 Sep 2004 04:34:55 AM
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:00 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.

"I think Rumsfeld has to take the responsibility there, because he's
the defense secretary and it looks like he didn't have a clue that
this was gonna happen. But, just like a baseball manager, I think he
should take one for the team."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/23/60minutes/main645202.shtml


-----

Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec

The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1051 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting

Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless

.

User: "duke"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 28 Sep 2004 06:50:38 PM
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:00 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:

And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.

But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service, including bill
clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.
Better luck next time, turkey.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "David Galehouse"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 28 Sep 2004 09:10:46 PM
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:94ujl016mk0b6sv31l7d2q7esskisdkbna@4ax.com...

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:00 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"

<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>

wrote:

And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.


But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service,

including bill

clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.

Better luck next time, turkey.

What are you babbling on about now, Dookie? Who was responsible for
constructing a reasonable exit strategy? Bill Clinton? John Kerry? Where's
that personal responsibility thing you rightards pretend to be so fond of?
You're a doofus, Dookie.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 30 Sep 2004 04:26:50 AM
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:10:46 GMT, "David Galehouse" <AndyG@cinci.rr.com> wrote:

But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service,

including bill

clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.
Better luck next time, turkey.

What are you babbling on about now, Dookie? Who was responsible for
constructing a reasonable exit strategy? Bill Clinton? John Kerry? Where's
that personal responsibility thing you rightards pretend to be so fond of?
You're a doofus, Dookie.

Very simple. 'rat willie set you up for the fall. President Bush is making sure it
doesn't happen again. flipper, well...................flipper is flipper.
You identify with flipper, I don't.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.


User: "Yang, AthD h.c"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 28 Sep 2004 09:31:21 PM
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:50:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:00 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:

And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.


But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service, including bill
clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.

That must be why the IAEA and the UN said (correctly) that AWOL was
full of ***** right before the invasion.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1051 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
User: "Jésus Pépé"

Title: {{{ PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE AMERICA }}} ==> Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 29 Sep 2004 05:38:48 AM
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:31:21 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:50:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:00 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:

And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.


But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service, including bill
clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.


That must be why the IAEA and the UN said (correctly) that AWOL was
full of ***** right before the invasion.


-----

Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec

The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1051 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting

Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless

.

User: "duke"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 30 Sep 2004 04:29:55 AM
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:31:21 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:50:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:00 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:

And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.


But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service, including bill
clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.


That must be why the IAEA and the UN said (correctly) that AWOL was
full of ***** right before the invasion.

Too bad your little Ununited Nations friends couldn't make a case.
There would be 1050 American soldiers still alive today if they could have walked the
street without holding hands with their handlers. But, you know, 'rat willie wasn't
interested - he was too busy getting blowjobs.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.


User: "wbarwell"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 29 Sep 2004 05:16:32 AM
duke wrote:

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:00 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.


But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service,
including bill clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.

The same intelligence that did not warn us of Saddam's
attack on Kuwait, let the 9/11 terrorists run free and
enact their plans and totally missed the collapse of the USSR.
We need a total overhaul of what passes laughingly as intelligence
in the USA.
We don't have any and obviously they botched the claim Saddam
has WMDs too.
Obviously you are too ignorant to realize, US intelligence is utterly
useless and has a long and horrendous record on all of this.
After the USSR collapsed into chaos and Yeltsin came to power,
I remember reading a sarcastic article by ex-President Ford.
After he became president, the CIA marched into his office
and gave him an official briefing on the US and the USSR.
They set up their flip charts and ran through a long list of
supposed intelligence. The US was in grip of inflation, high
unemployment dropping income, problems with failing industries
risiong poverty, failure! Failure! We were in a steady decline
with no relief in sight in the immediate future.
The USSR on the other hand was growing rapidly in GDP and
its economy was poised to grow rapidly for the next decade. Their armies
were bigger that ours and rapidly closeing the gap qualitatively, already
theuir tanks and artillery werre better than ours and their missles
would soon be as good as ours.
The USSR was poised to overtake the US in all fields, military,
economic, GDP growth, everything
Ford said he sat there feeling smaller and smaller in his chair
as the grim faced CIA officer rattled through the bad news,
on and on and on flipping his charts from one bad piece of news
to the next, relentlessly.
And it was all *****. It was total *****.
The USSR a decade later collapsed totally and utterly, the
economy so collapsed that for two years the real twin
currencies of the USSR was the homemade bottle of vodka
and smuggled American dollars.
The USSR had trouble feeding itself and had to mobile
college students and the Red Army to harvest potatos.
If we are in a war because these ***** artists, we should all of us be
outraged about it. Not saying is OK because they foiolled Clinton too.
This is the difference between right winger morions, llike youm and sane
people.
Anybody not outraged and worried about teh failures of the
US intellgence community to get the collapse of the USSR right and to
claim falsely for years Saddam hasd large WMD programs
and stockpiles of weapons which turned out like their USSR claims to be
totally and utterly false to the last particular is not doing this nation a
favor.
That Kerry's purple heart is a campaign issue and this grotesque
failure of intelligence, one of a string of outsized and very dangerous
failures is not is an utter outrage.
A sign our leaders, whether Democrat or GOP are all idiots that this is not
a major issue.
--
Kerry - two medals a silver and bronze star.
Bush? Well they don't give medals
for going AWOL, missing your medical and
getting grounded or falling off of a bar stool.
Kerry - a hero, Bush - a zero
Cheerful Charlie
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 30 Sep 2004 04:50:54 AM
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:16:32 -0400, wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:

But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service,
including bill clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.

The same intelligence that did not warn us of Saddam's
attack on Kuwait,

Even your pet cat saw that one coming even though you didn't..

let the 9/11 terrorists run free and
enact their plans

No body knew what the plan was.

and totally missed the collapse of the USSR.

President Reagan ran a brilliant campaign in bringing down the USSR.

We need a total overhaul of what passes laughingly as intelligence
in the USA.
We don't have any and obviously they botched the claim Saddam
has WMDs too.

It was 'rat willie's group.

Obviously you are too ignorant to realize, US intelligence is utterly
useless and has a long and horrendous record on all of this.

Then what do you suggest as an alternative. 'rat willie is the one that took all it's
steam away by eliminating ground intelligence and replacing with satellite data.

After the USSR collapsed into chaos and Yeltsin came to power,
I remember reading a sarcastic article by ex-President Ford.
After he became president, the CIA marched into his office
and gave him an official briefing on the US and the USSR.
They set up their flip charts and ran through a long list of
supposed intelligence. The US was in grip of inflation, high
unemployment dropping income, problems with failing industries
risiong poverty, failure! Failure! We were in a steady decline
with no relief in sight in the immediate future.
The USSR on the other hand was growing rapidly in GDP and
its economy was poised to grow rapidly for the next decade. Their armies
were bigger that ours and rapidly closeing the gap qualitatively, already
theuir tanks and artillery werre better than ours and their missles
would soon be as good as ours.
The USSR was poised to overtake the US in all fields, military,
economic, GDP growth, everything
Ford said he sat there feeling smaller and smaller in his chair
as the grim faced CIA officer rattled through the bad news,
on and on and on flipping his charts from one bad piece of news
to the next, relentlessly.
And it was all *****. It was total *****.
The USSR a decade later collapsed totally and utterly, the
economy so collapsed that for two years the real twin
currencies of the USSR was the homemade bottle of vodka
and smuggled American dollars.
The USSR had trouble feeding itself and had to mobile
college students and the Red Army to harvest potatos.
If we are in a war because these ***** artists, we should all of us be
outraged about it. Not saying is OK because they foiolled Clinton too.
This is the difference between right winger morions, llike youm and sane
people.

Interesting comment. Why wan't the left wing morons like you a part of it also? Maybe
it's because you read too many comics, and watch too many movies, where the script says
the good guy (us Republicans) always win in the end.

Anybody not outraged and worried about teh failures of the
US intellgence community to get the collapse of the USSR right and to
claim falsely for years Saddam hasd large WMD programs
and stockpiles of weapons which turned out like their USSR claims to be
totally and utterly false to the last particular is not doing this nation a
favor.

So what is your solution?

That Kerry's purple heart is a campaign issue and this grotesque
failure of intelligence, one of a string of outsized and very dangerous
failures is not is an utter outrage.

He's the one that brought it up. He's the one that elected to build his campaign around
his military record. He's the one that begged for it to deeply reviewed. Too bad lather
rather destroyed the parallel effort to find fault with President Bush's brilliant
military record.

A sign our leaders, whether Democrat or GOP are all idiots that this is not
a major issue.

I don't see it as our leaders being the idiots, but the people doing the voting.
The backbone of your party is the left wing fringe element - abortion queens, war
activists, queers, lesbians, minorities, union labor that can't even direct it's dues to
it's selected party, etc. Better known as the me-first group.
The backbone of my party is the right wing who pays for it all.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.

User: "Vash The Stampede"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 30 Sep 2004 07:30:50 AM
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:16:32 -0400, wbarwell wrote:
<Interesting story about Ford snipped for brevity>

This is the difference between right winger morions, llike youm and sane
people.

Anybody not outraged and worried about teh failures of the
US intellgence community to get the collapse of the USSR right and to
claim falsely for years Saddam hasd large WMD programs
and stockpiles of weapons which turned out like their USSR claims to be
totally and utterly false to the last particular is not doing this nation a
favor.

The creation of the Office of Homeland Security is a waste and a joke. Has
it *really* made us any safer? I doubt it.
In the days after the attack of Pearl Harbor, the military did some soul
searching, and it was discovered that *maybe* they knew more than they
thought they did. The problem was, the Navy had half the story, and the
Army had the other half. So, it was decided that any information gathered
by any branch of the military should be reviewed by a third party and then
disseminated to all branches so they would all have valid information. A
new department was created to do just this, and was called the Central
Intelligence Agency. THat was it's original function, to take all
information from all sources and glean it until it all made sense. Seems
to me that if the CIA were doing the job it was created to do, yet
*another* office would be unnecessary, and Homeland Seurity would be
redundant.


That Kerry's purple heart is a campaign issue and this grotesque
failure of intelligence, one of a string of outsized and very dangerous
failures is not is an utter outrage.

I'll agree with that...on *both* sides of the issue! (Hey, I'm startiing
to *sound* like Kerry!)


A sign our leaders, whether Democrat or GOP are all idiots that this is not
a major issue.

Yeah, I'll agree with that one too! This guy hit it right on the head.
Move away from 30+ years ago and deal with recent history. Gee, where have
I heard that before? Good luck...they're too wrapped up in a war nobody
wanted to fight to pay attention to what has happened in the last four
years...
--
Besides, what would they say if I told them
I was hanging out with Vash The Stampede?
.


User: "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"

Title: Re: Even Bill O'Reilly Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship? 28 Sep 2004 09:44:19 PM
duke wrote:

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:00 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:


And Iraq is why the O'Reilly finger is increasingly being pointed at
the Bush White House. "A huge mistake was made in underestimating the
aftermath of Saddam," says O'Reilly.



But the decision was based on every free world intelligence service, including bill
clinton and john kerry that we needed to move now.

Come again? Are you saying that Bill Clinton and John Kerry are
"intelligence services?"
-n
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Even Leading NeoCons Jumps Off AWOL's Sinking Ship
Even Bob Barr Is Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship?
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XX (re: Why Are NeoCons so Incompetent?)
Conservatives Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Surprise! Bush's Own Staff Jumping Off His Sinking Ship (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetemn)t
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXIII (re: Why Are NeoCons so Incompetent?)
Another Intelligent Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXXI (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
WSJ: American Soldiers Watching F911, Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship (re: Why Are NeoCons so Incompetent?)
Tony Blair Jumping Off of AWOL's Sinking Ship
Yet More Conservatives Jumping Off Of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XV (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXIX (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
More Conservatives Jumping off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part LII (Special Michael Moore Edition)
More Conservatives Jumping off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part LIV (Special Michael Moore Edition)
Conservatives Jumping Off Bush's Sinking Ship, Part IV (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
More Conservatives Jumping off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part LI (Special Michael Moore Edition)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER