Evidence for God?



 Religions > Atheism > Evidence for God?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Bill"
Date: 28 Dec 2004 01:16:40 PM
Object: Evidence for God?
The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old, translated dozens of
times, made up, possibly from early parchments, the safe keeping and
therefore
the accuracy of which over a two thousand five hundred years would be truly
miraculous. Printing of books and bibles for general distribution did not
start until six hundred years ago, after the invention of the printing
press.
Before that such documents were hand written by scribes who added,
subtracted or altered whatever suited them, either on religious grounds or
for purely personal gratification, or under pressure from the warlords of
the
time who used religion and the fear of it's god to subjugate and manipulate
the
population in the absence of common law and the rule of law. We
humans do that you know.
There is no objective evidence that these collections of these documents
called the Bible are accurate history. As a minimum they are an abstruse
mixture of history, allegories, fables, folk tales and contain many
contradictions.
Archaeological evidence shows man has existed on earth for 150,000 years.
Why did God wait for well over 100,000 of those years to communicate his
wishes and commands and then to transmit this important information to only
a small part of the world by such inaccurate and unproven means?
God is claimed to be all powerful and creator of the heavens and the earth
and every thing in it.
There are thousands of Gods, religions and religious beliefs. Why does the
real God not tell us which is the correct one?
God is claimed to be all good. If this is true, why does he let man suffer
from thousands of painful and debilitating illnesses? Some have said this is
punishment for mans sins. If this true, why does God permit children to be
stillborn, born with debilitating handicaps and dysfunctional brains and die
at an early age of disease, before they have ever had a chance to sin?
Why did not God himself tell the whole world directly about his expectations
of man and why did he not do this when man first appeared on earth instead
of waiting over 100,000 years? Why did God not tell his story to the whole
world via International TV, instead of just a small population in the Middle
East? There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of any God
and logic and common sense indicates this is all fiction.
There is NO objective evidence that "Jesus" was Gods son. In fact there is
NO objective evidence that God exists much less that he has a son.
Why would Jesus have to descend to earth and be cruelly killed on a cross to
atone for man's sins? Why couldn't God just forgive these sins without this
grotesque and macabre arrangement of Jesus suffering on the cross with two
criminals?
Why would God wait over 100,000 years after man was on earth to send his son
down to save man which God himself created? God supposedly created the
universe and man. Why did God create man to be sinful and now have to save
him?
If there is a God he must be a cruel brutal barbarian. The evidence is that
no God created man. Quite the opposite, the evidence is that man created
God!
"Yesterday this days madness did prepare:
Tomorrow's silence, triumph, or despair:
Drink! For you know not whence you came, nor why;
Drink! For you know not why you go nor where."
The Rubaiyat - by Omar Khayyam
--
Bill
.

User: "Eat me"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 05:57:03 PM
"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:siiAd.1179946$Gx4.167617@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old, translated dozens of
times, made up, possibly from early parchments, the safe keeping and
therefore
the accuracy of which over a two thousand five hundred years would be

truly

miraculous. Printing of books and bibles for general distribution did not
start until six hundred years ago, after the invention of the printing
press.
Before that such documents were hand written by scribes who added,
subtracted or altered whatever suited them, either on religious grounds or
for purely personal gratification, or under pressure from the warlords of
the
time who used religion and the fear of it's god to subjugate and

manipulate

the
population in the absence of common law and the rule of law. We
humans do that you know.

There is no objective evidence that these collections of these documents
called the Bible are accurate history. As a minimum they are an abstruse
mixture of history, allegories, fables, folk tales and contain many
contradictions.

Archaeological evidence shows man has existed on earth for 150,000 years.
Why did God wait for well over 100,000 of those years to communicate his
wishes and commands and then to transmit this important information to

only

a small part of the world by such inaccurate and unproven means?

God is claimed to be all powerful and creator of the heavens and the earth
and every thing in it.
There are thousands of Gods, religions and religious beliefs. Why does the
real God not tell us which is the correct one?

God is claimed to be all good. If this is true, why does he let man suffer
from thousands of painful and debilitating illnesses? Some have said this

is

punishment for mans sins. If this true, why does God permit children to be
stillborn, born with debilitating handicaps and dysfunctional brains and

die

at an early age of disease, before they have ever had a chance to sin?

Why did not God himself tell the whole world directly about his

expectations

of man and why did he not do this when man first appeared on earth instead
of waiting over 100,000 years? Why did God not tell his story to the whole
world via International TV, instead of just a small population in the

Middle

East? There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of any

God

and logic and common sense indicates this is all fiction.

There is NO objective evidence that "Jesus" was Gods son. In fact there is
NO objective evidence that God exists much less that he has a son.

Why would Jesus have to descend to earth and be cruelly killed on a cross

to

atone for man's sins? Why couldn't God just forgive these sins without

this

grotesque and macabre arrangement of Jesus suffering on the cross with two
criminals?

Why would God wait over 100,000 years after man was on earth to send his

son

down to save man which God himself created? God supposedly created the
universe and man. Why did God create man to be sinful and now have to save
him?

If there is a God he must be a cruel brutal barbarian. The evidence is

that

no God created man. Quite the opposite, the evidence is that man created
God!

"Yesterday this days madness did prepare:
Tomorrow's silence, triumph, or despair:
Drink! For you know not whence you came, nor why;
Drink! For you know not why you go nor where."

The Rubaiyat - by Omar Khayyam





--
Bill
Amen,Thanks for saying what so many of us feel!

.

User: ""

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 05:51:19 PM
Bill wrote:

The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old,

which means it's an inane old piece of literature written by inane
senile old men.
.
User: "Barry OGrady"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 29 Dec 2004 05:47:50 AM
None.
-Barry
========
"I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for
their numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible;
in my opinion, only His nonexistence could excuse Him."
[A. Einstein (Letter to Edgar Meyer, Jan. 2, 1915)]
Web page: http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
.


User: "Jez"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 29 Dec 2004 02:29:52 PM
Bill wrote:

The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old,

Yeah...so fucking what. Please don't x-post between alt.atheism and any
religious group...
we get enough ***** believers already, without giving them an excuse
to post here.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
Skype callto://hellward
NFS Underground2.MOH PA And AA
Yeowww
.

User: "bob young"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 11:08:25 PM
Bill wrote:

The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old, translated dozens of
times, made up, possibly from early parchments, the safe keeping and
therefore
the accuracy of which over a two thousand five hundred years would be truly
miraculous. Printing of books and bibles for general distribution did not
start until six hundred years ago, after the invention of the printing
press.
Before that such documents were hand written by scribes who added,
subtracted or altered whatever suited them, either on religious grounds or
for purely personal gratification, or under pressure from the warlords of
the
time who used religion and the fear of it's god to subjugate and manipulate
the
population in the absence of common law and the rule of law. We
humans do that you know.

There is no objective evidence that these collections of these documents
called the Bible are accurate history. As a minimum they are an abstruse
mixture of history, allegories, fables, folk tales and contain many
contradictions.

Archaeological evidence shows man has existed on earth for 150,000 years.
Why did God wait for well over 100,000 of those years to communicate his
wishes and commands and then to transmit this important information to only
a small part of the world by such inaccurate and unproven means?

God is claimed to be all powerful and creator of the heavens and the earth
and every thing in it.
There are thousands of Gods, religions and religious beliefs. Why does the
real God not tell us which is the correct one?

God is claimed to be all good. If this is true, why does he let man suffer
from thousands of painful and debilitating illnesses? Some have said this is
punishment for mans sins. If this true, why does God permit children to be
stillborn, born with debilitating handicaps and dysfunctional brains and die
at an early age of disease, before they have ever had a chance to sin?

Why did not God himself tell the whole world directly about his expectations
of man and why did he not do this when man first appeared on earth instead
of waiting over 100,000 years? Why did God not tell his story to the whole
world via International TV, instead of just a small population in the Middle
East? There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of any God
and logic and common sense indicates this is all fiction.

There is NO objective evidence that "Jesus" was Gods son. In fact there is
NO objective evidence that God exists much less that he has a son.

Why would Jesus have to descend to earth and be cruelly killed on a cross to
atone for man's sins? Why couldn't God just forgive these sins without this
grotesque and macabre arrangement of Jesus suffering on the cross with two
criminals?

Why would God wait over 100,000 years after man was on earth to send his son
down to save man which God himself created? God supposedly created the
universe and man. Why did God create man to be sinful and now have to save
him?

If there is a God he must be a cruel brutal barbarian. The evidence is that
no God created man. Quite the opposite, the evidence is that man created
God!

"Yesterday this days madness did prepare:
Tomorrow's silence, triumph, or despair:
Drink! For you know not whence you came, nor why;
Drink! For you know not why you go nor where."

The Rubaiyat - by Omar Khayyam

--
Bill

The high deathtol from the Asian earthquake and Tsusami looks like reaching
100,000, the religionists will be closing their doors, drawing the curtains and
keeping a low profile. Not a good time to be talking about gods!
.
User: "Bill"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 29 Dec 2004 11:00:03 AM
Dead on!
--
Bill
"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:41D23BC9.690240A7@netvigator.com...



Bill wrote:

The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old, translated dozens of
times, made up, possibly from early parchments, the safe keeping and
therefore
the accuracy of which over a two thousand five hundred years would be

truly

miraculous. Printing of books and bibles for general distribution did

not

start until six hundred years ago, after the invention of the printing
press.
Before that such documents were hand written by scribes who added,
subtracted or altered whatever suited them, either on religious grounds

or

for purely personal gratification, or under pressure from the warlords

of

the
time who used religion and the fear of it's god to subjugate and

manipulate

the
population in the absence of common law and the rule of law. We
humans do that you know.

There is no objective evidence that these collections of these documents
called the Bible are accurate history. As a minimum they are an abstruse
mixture of history, allegories, fables, folk tales and contain many
contradictions.

Archaeological evidence shows man has existed on earth for 150,000

years.

Why did God wait for well over 100,000 of those years to communicate his
wishes and commands and then to transmit this important information to

only

a small part of the world by such inaccurate and unproven means?

God is claimed to be all powerful and creator of the heavens and the

earth

and every thing in it.
There are thousands of Gods, religions and religious beliefs. Why does

the

real God not tell us which is the correct one?

God is claimed to be all good. If this is true, why does he let man

suffer

from thousands of painful and debilitating illnesses? Some have said

this is

punishment for mans sins. If this true, why does God permit children to

be

stillborn, born with debilitating handicaps and dysfunctional brains and

die

at an early age of disease, before they have ever had a chance to sin?

Why did not God himself tell the whole world directly about his

expectations

of man and why did he not do this when man first appeared on earth

instead

of waiting over 100,000 years? Why did God not tell his story to the

whole

world via International TV, instead of just a small population in the

Middle

East? There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of any

God

and logic and common sense indicates this is all fiction.

There is NO objective evidence that "Jesus" was Gods son. In fact there

is

NO objective evidence that God exists much less that he has a son.

Why would Jesus have to descend to earth and be cruelly killed on a

cross to

atone for man's sins? Why couldn't God just forgive these sins without

this

grotesque and macabre arrangement of Jesus suffering on the cross with

two

criminals?

Why would God wait over 100,000 years after man was on earth to send his

son

down to save man which God himself created? God supposedly created the
universe and man. Why did God create man to be sinful and now have to

save

him?

If there is a God he must be a cruel brutal barbarian. The evidence is

that

no God created man. Quite the opposite, the evidence is that man created
God!

"Yesterday this days madness did prepare:
Tomorrow's silence, triumph, or despair:
Drink! For you know not whence you came, nor why;
Drink! For you know not why you go nor where."

The Rubaiyat - by Omar Khayyam

--
Bill


The high deathtol from the Asian earthquake and Tsusami looks like

reaching

100,000, the religionists will be closing their doors, drawing the

curtains and

keeping a low profile. Not a good time to be talking about gods!


.


User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 01:51:01 PM
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> pontificated:

The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old, translated dozens of
times, made up, possibly from early parchments, the safe keeping and
therefore
the accuracy of which over a two thousand five hundred years would be truly
miraculous. Printing of books and bibles for general distribution did not
start until six hundred years ago, after the invention of the printing
press.
Before that such documents were hand written by scribes who added,
subtracted or altered whatever suited them, either on religious grounds or
for purely personal gratification, or under pressure from the warlords of
the
time who used religion and the fear of it's god to subjugate and manipulate
the
population in the absence of common law and the rule of law. We
humans do that you know.

There is no objective evidence that these collections of these documents
called the Bible are accurate history. As a minimum they are an abstruse
mixture of history, allegories, fables, folk tales and contain many
contradictions.

Archaeological evidence shows man has existed on earth for 150,000 years.
Why did God wait for well over 100,000 of those years to communicate his
wishes and commands and then to transmit this important information to only
a small part of the world by such inaccurate and unproven means?

God is claimed to be all powerful and creator of the heavens and the earth
and every thing in it.
There are thousands of Gods, religions and religious beliefs. Why does the
real God not tell us which is the correct one?

God is claimed to be all good. If this is true, why does he let man suffer
from thousands of painful and debilitating illnesses? Some have said this is
punishment for mans sins. If this true, why does God permit children to be
stillborn, born with debilitating handicaps and dysfunctional brains and die
at an early age of disease, before they have ever had a chance to sin?

Why did not God himself tell the whole world directly about his expectations
of man and why did he not do this when man first appeared on earth instead
of waiting over 100,000 years? Why did God not tell his story to the whole
world via International TV, instead of just a small population in the Middle
East? There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of any God
and logic and common sense indicates this is all fiction.

There is NO objective evidence that "Jesus" was Gods son. In fact there is
NO objective evidence that God exists much less that he has a son.

Why would Jesus have to descend to earth and be cruelly killed on a cross to
atone for man's sins? Why couldn't God just forgive these sins without this
grotesque and macabre arrangement of Jesus suffering on the cross with two
criminals?

Why would God wait over 100,000 years after man was on earth to send his son
down to save man which God himself created? God supposedly created the
universe and man. Why did God create man to be sinful and now have to save
him?

If there is a God he must be a cruel brutal barbarian. The evidence is that
no God created man. Quite the opposite, the evidence is that man created
God!

"Yesterday this days madness did prepare:
Tomorrow's silence, triumph, or despair:
Drink! For you know not whence you came, nor why;
Drink! For you know not why you go nor where."

The Rubaiyat - by Omar Khayyam

You rant is noted. However, the truth is that the Old
Testament for example, is one of the greatest history
books ever written and has time and time again, proved
to be accurate.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.
User: "Family Man"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 03:20:23 PM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i7e3t0tscvlrces1dqc7nu7grq4nmf6not@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> pontificated:


The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old, translated dozens of
times, made up, possibly from early parchments, the safe keeping and
therefore
the accuracy of which over a two thousand five hundred years would be
truly
miraculous. Printing of books and bibles for general distribution did not
start until six hundred years ago, after the invention of the printing
press.
Before that such documents were hand written by scribes who added,
subtracted or altered whatever suited them, either on religious grounds or
for purely personal gratification, or under pressure from the warlords of
the
time who used religion and the fear of it's god to subjugate and
manipulate
the
population in the absence of common law and the rule of law. We
humans do that you know.

There is no objective evidence that these collections of these documents
called the Bible are accurate history. As a minimum they are an abstruse
mixture of history, allegories, fables, folk tales and contain many
contradictions.

Archaeological evidence shows man has existed on earth for 150,000 years.
Why did God wait for well over 100,000 of those years to communicate his
wishes and commands and then to transmit this important information to
only
a small part of the world by such inaccurate and unproven means?

God is claimed to be all powerful and creator of the heavens and the earth
and every thing in it.
There are thousands of Gods, religions and religious beliefs. Why does the
real God not tell us which is the correct one?

God is claimed to be all good. If this is true, why does he let man suffer
from thousands of painful and debilitating illnesses? Some have said this
is
punishment for mans sins. If this true, why does God permit children to be
stillborn, born with debilitating handicaps and dysfunctional brains and
die
at an early age of disease, before they have ever had a chance to sin?

Why did not God himself tell the whole world directly about his
expectations
of man and why did he not do this when man first appeared on earth instead
of waiting over 100,000 years? Why did God not tell his story to the whole
world via International TV, instead of just a small population in the
Middle
East? There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of any
God
and logic and common sense indicates this is all fiction.

There is NO objective evidence that "Jesus" was Gods son. In fact there is
NO objective evidence that God exists much less that he has a son.

Why would Jesus have to descend to earth and be cruelly killed on a cross
to
atone for man's sins? Why couldn't God just forgive these sins without
this
grotesque and macabre arrangement of Jesus suffering on the cross with two
criminals?

Why would God wait over 100,000 years after man was on earth to send his
son
down to save man which God himself created? God supposedly created the
universe and man. Why did God create man to be sinful and now have to save
him?

If there is a God he must be a cruel brutal barbarian. The evidence is
that
no God created man. Quite the opposite, the evidence is that man created
God!

"Yesterday this days madness did prepare:
Tomorrow's silence, triumph, or despair:
Drink! For you know not whence you came, nor why;
Drink! For you know not why you go nor where."

The Rubaiyat - by Omar Khayyam


You rant is noted. However, the truth is that the Old
Testament for example, is one of the greatest history
books ever written and has time and time again, proved
to be accurate.

You are so delusional, it's funny!
How "accurate" is a flat earth, plants before sun, the sun revolving around
the earth, virgin births,
etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.......
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 03:41:14 PM
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:20:23 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i7e3t0tscvlrces1dqc7nu7grq4nmf6not@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> pontificated:


The bible is a religious book, over 2500 years old, translated dozens of
times, made up, possibly from early parchments, the safe keeping and
therefore
the accuracy of which over a two thousand five hundred years would be
truly
miraculous. Printing of books and bibles for general distribution did not
start until six hundred years ago, after the invention of the printing
press.
Before that such documents were hand written by scribes who added,
subtracted or altered whatever suited them, either on religious grounds or
for purely personal gratification, or under pressure from the warlords of
the
time who used religion and the fear of it's god to subjugate and
manipulate
the
population in the absence of common law and the rule of law. We
humans do that you know.

There is no objective evidence that these collections of these documents
called the Bible are accurate history. As a minimum they are an abstruse
mixture of history, allegories, fables, folk tales and contain many
contradictions.

Archaeological evidence shows man has existed on earth for 150,000 years.
Why did God wait for well over 100,000 of those years to communicate his
wishes and commands and then to transmit this important information to
only
a small part of the world by such inaccurate and unproven means?

God is claimed to be all powerful and creator of the heavens and the earth
and every thing in it.
There are thousands of Gods, religions and religious beliefs. Why does the
real God not tell us which is the correct one?

God is claimed to be all good. If this is true, why does he let man suffer
from thousands of painful and debilitating illnesses? Some have said this
is
punishment for mans sins. If this true, why does God permit children to be
stillborn, born with debilitating handicaps and dysfunctional brains and
die
at an early age of disease, before they have ever had a chance to sin?

Why did not God himself tell the whole world directly about his
expectations
of man and why did he not do this when man first appeared on earth instead
of waiting over 100,000 years? Why did God not tell his story to the whole
world via International TV, instead of just a small population in the
Middle
East? There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of any
God
and logic and common sense indicates this is all fiction.

There is NO objective evidence that "Jesus" was Gods son. In fact there is
NO objective evidence that God exists much less that he has a son.

Why would Jesus have to descend to earth and be cruelly killed on a cross
to
atone for man's sins? Why couldn't God just forgive these sins without
this
grotesque and macabre arrangement of Jesus suffering on the cross with two
criminals?

Why would God wait over 100,000 years after man was on earth to send his
son
down to save man which God himself created? God supposedly created the
universe and man. Why did God create man to be sinful and now have to save
him?

If there is a God he must be a cruel brutal barbarian. The evidence is
that
no God created man. Quite the opposite, the evidence is that man created
God!

"Yesterday this days madness did prepare:
Tomorrow's silence, triumph, or despair:
Drink! For you know not whence you came, nor why;
Drink! For you know not why you go nor where."

The Rubaiyat - by Omar Khayyam


You rant is noted. However, the truth is that the Old
Testament for example, is one of the greatest history
books ever written and has time and time again, proved
to be accurate.


You are so delusional, it's funny!

How "accurate" is a flat earth, plants before sun, the sun revolving around
the earth, virgin births,
etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.......

Your idiotic attempts at an attack is noted. Now maybe
you might try basing your attacks on something the
Bible actually says. Or maybe you prefer to stay
ignorant.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.
User: "Family Man"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 04:51:40 PM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:cmk3t01o89stdkqb48hf8etmfj4hn2eunn@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:20:23 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i7e3t0tscvlrces1dqc7nu7grq4nmf6not@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.


Your idiotic attempts at an attack is noted. Now maybe
you might try basing your attacks on something the
Bible actually says. Or maybe you prefer to stay
ignorant.

Here you go Dave boy...
1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite. 1:1-2:3
2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark
them? 1:3-5
3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8
4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11
5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11
6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14
7.. God makes two lights: "the greater light [the sun] to rule the day,
and the lesser light [the moon] to rule the night." But the moon is not a
light, but only reflects light from the sun. And why, if God made the moon
to "rule the night", does it spend half of its time moving through the
daytime sky? 1:16
8.. "He made the stars also." God spends a day making light (before making
the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard
day's work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of stars.
1:16
9.. "And God set them [the stars] in the firmament of the heaven to give
light upon the earth." 1:17
10.. In verse 11, God "let the earth bring forth" the plants. Now he has
the earth "bring forth" the animals as well. So maybe the creationists have
it all wrong. Maybe God created livings things through the process of
evolution. 1:24
11.. God gave humans dominion over every other living thing on earth. 1:26
12.. God commands us to "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the
earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over ... every living thing that
moveth upon the earth." 1:28
13.. All animals were originally herbivores. Tapeworms, vampire bats,
mosquitoes, and barracudas -- all were strict vegetarians, as they were
created by God. 1:30
14.. "God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good." He purposefully designed a system that ensures the suffering and
death of all his creatures, parasite and host, predator and prey. 1:31
15.. In Genesis 1 the entire creation takes 6 days, but the universe is at
least 12 billion years old, with new stars constantly being formed. 1:31
16.. Humans were not created instantaneously from dust and breath, but
evolved over millions of years from simpler life forms. 2:7
17.. After making the animals, God has Adam name them all. The naming of
several million species must have kept Adam busy for a while. But animals
were not created instantaneously from the ground, but evolved over millions
of years. And we still don't have names for all of them. Ten thousand new
species of insects are discovered and named each year. 2:18-22
18.. God curses the serpent. From now on the serpent will crawl on his
belly and eat dust. One wonders how he got around before -- by hopping on
his tail, perhaps? But snakes don't eat dust, do they? 3:14
19.. Because Adam listened to Eve, God cursed the ground and causes thorns
and thistles to grow. Before this, according to the (false) Genesis story,
plants had no natural defenses. The rose had no thorn, cacti were spineless,
holly leaves were smooth, and the nettle had no sting. Foxgloves, oleander,
and milkweeds were all perfectly safe to eat. 3:17-18
20.. "There were giants in the earth in those days." Well, I suppose it's
good to know that. But why is there no archaeological evidence for the
existence of these giants? 6:4
21.. Noah is told to make an ark that is 450 feet long. 6:14-15
22.. Whether by twos or by sevens, Noah takes male and female
representatives from each species of "every thing that creepeth upon the
earth." 7:8
23.. God opens the "windows of heaven." He does this every time it rains.
7:11
24.. All of the animals boarded the ark "in the selfsame day." 7:13-14
25.. The flood covered the highest mountain tops (Mount Everest?) with
fifteen cubits to spare. 7:20
26.. "The windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was
restrained." This happens whenever it stops raining. 8:2
27.. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11
28.. When the animals left the ark, what would they have eaten? There
would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a
year. What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would
have gone extinct. And how did the New World primates or the Australian
marsupials find there way back after the flood subsided? 8:19
29.. Noah kills the "clean beasts" and burns their dead bodies for God.
According to 7:8 this would have caused the extinction of all "clean"
animals since only two of each were taken onto the ark. 8:20-21
30.. "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth." Although this
would have been good advice for the mythical Noah, it is deadly advice for
humankind as a whole. Overpopulation is one of our greatest problems, yet
there is nothing in the bible to address it. 9:1
31.. According to this verse, all animals fear humans. Although it is true
that many do, it is also true that some do not. Sharks and grizzly bears,
for example, are generally much less afraid of us than we are of them. 9:2
32.. "Into your hand are they (the animals) delivered." God gave the
animals to humans, and they can do whatever they please with them. This
verse has been used by bible believers to justify all kinds of cruelty to
anmials and environmental destruction. 9:2
33.. God is rightly filled with remorse for having killed his creatures.
He even puts the rainbow in the sky to remind himself of his promise to the
animals not to do it again. But rainbows are caused by the nature of light,
the refractive index of water, and the shape of raindrops. There were
rainbows billions of years before humans existed. 9:13
34.. Some creationists believe that this verse refers to continental
drift, which, they say, began to occur during the days of Pelag (which means
"division"), about 100 or so years after the flood. But many other
creationists disagree. 10:25
35.. "The whole earth was of one language." But this could not be true,
since by this time (around 2400 BCE) there were already many languages, each
unintelligible to the others. 11:1, 6
36.. God worries that people could actually build a tower high enough to
reach him (them?) in heaven. 11:4
37.. According to the Tower of Babel story, the many human languages were
created instantaneously by God. But actually the various languages evolved
gradually over long periods of time. 11:9
38.. The ridiculously long lives of the patriarchs. 11:10-32
39.. "And they returned to the land of the Philistines." But the
Philistines didn't arrive in the region of Canaan until around 1400 BCE --
600 years after Abraham's supposed migration from Ur. 21:32, 26:1, 21:32,
21:32, 8, 15, 18
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 07:32:36 PM
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:51:40 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:cmk3t01o89stdkqb48hf8etmfj4hn2eunn@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:20:23 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i7e3t0tscvlrces1dqc7nu7grq4nmf6not@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.


Your idiotic attempts at an attack is noted. Now maybe
you might try basing your attacks on something the
Bible actually says. Or maybe you prefer to stay
ignorant.


Here you go Dave boy...

See end of message.

1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite. 1:1-2:3

2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark
them? 1:3-5

3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8

4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11

5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11

6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14

7.. God makes two lights: "the greater light [the sun] to rule the day,
and the lesser light [the moon] to rule the night." But the moon is not a
light, but only reflects light from the sun. And why, if God made the moon
to "rule the night", does it spend half of its time moving through the
daytime sky? 1:16

8.. "He made the stars also." God spends a day making light (before making
the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard
day's work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of stars.
1:16

9.. "And God set them [the stars] in the firmament of the heaven to give
light upon the earth." 1:17

10.. In verse 11, God "let the earth bring forth" the plants. Now he has
the earth "bring forth" the animals as well. So maybe the creationists have
it all wrong. Maybe God created livings things through the process of
evolution. 1:24

11.. God gave humans dominion over every other living thing on earth. 1:26

12.. God commands us to "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the
earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over ... every living thing that
moveth upon the earth." 1:28

13.. All animals were originally herbivores. Tapeworms, vampire bats,
mosquitoes, and barracudas -- all were strict vegetarians, as they were
created by God. 1:30

14.. "God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good." He purposefully designed a system that ensures the suffering and
death of all his creatures, parasite and host, predator and prey. 1:31

15.. In Genesis 1 the entire creation takes 6 days, but the universe is at
least 12 billion years old, with new stars constantly being formed. 1:31

16.. Humans were not created instantaneously from dust and breath, but
evolved over millions of years from simpler life forms. 2:7

17.. After making the animals, God has Adam name them all. The naming of
several million species must have kept Adam busy for a while. But animals
were not created instantaneously from the ground, but evolved over millions
of years. And we still don't have names for all of them. Ten thousand new
species of insects are discovered and named each year. 2:18-22

18.. God curses the serpent. From now on the serpent will crawl on his
belly and eat dust. One wonders how he got around before -- by hopping on
his tail, perhaps? But snakes don't eat dust, do they? 3:14

19.. Because Adam listened to Eve, God cursed the ground and causes thorns
and thistles to grow. Before this, according to the (false) Genesis story,
plants had no natural defenses. The rose had no thorn, cacti were spineless,
holly leaves were smooth, and the nettle had no sting. Foxgloves, oleander,
and milkweeds were all perfectly safe to eat. 3:17-18

20.. "There were giants in the earth in those days." Well, I suppose it's
good to know that. But why is there no archaeological evidence for the
existence of these giants? 6:4

21.. Noah is told to make an ark that is 450 feet long. 6:14-15

22.. Whether by twos or by sevens, Noah takes male and female
representatives from each species of "every thing that creepeth upon the
earth." 7:8

23.. God opens the "windows of heaven." He does this every time it rains.
7:11

24.. All of the animals boarded the ark "in the selfsame day." 7:13-14

25.. The flood covered the highest mountain tops (Mount Everest?) with
fifteen cubits to spare. 7:20

26.. "The windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was
restrained." This happens whenever it stops raining. 8:2

27.. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11

28.. When the animals left the ark, what would they have eaten? There
would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a
year. What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would
have gone extinct. And how did the New World primates or the Australian
marsupials find there way back after the flood subsided? 8:19

29.. Noah kills the "clean beasts" and burns their dead bodies for God.
According to 7:8 this would have caused the extinction of all "clean"
animals since only two of each were taken onto the ark. 8:20-21

30.. "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth." Although this
would have been good advice for the mythical Noah, it is deadly advice for
humankind as a whole. Overpopulation is one of our greatest problems, yet
there is nothing in the bible to address it. 9:1

31.. According to this verse, all animals fear humans. Although it is true
that many do, it is also true that some do not. Sharks and grizzly bears,
for example, are generally much less afraid of us than we are of them. 9:2

32.. "Into your hand are they (the animals) delivered." God gave the
animals to humans, and they can do whatever they please with them. This
verse has been used by bible believers to justify all kinds of cruelty to
anmials and environmental destruction. 9:2

33.. God is rightly filled with remorse for having killed his creatures.
He even puts the rainbow in the sky to remind himself of his promise to the
animals not to do it again. But rainbows are caused by the nature of light,
the refractive index of water, and the shape of raindrops. There were
rainbows billions of years before humans existed. 9:13

34.. Some creationists believe that this verse refers to continental
drift, which, they say, began to occur during the days of Pelag (which means
"division"), about 100 or so years after the flood. But many other
creationists disagree. 10:25

35.. "The whole earth was of one language." But this could not be true,
since by this time (around 2400 BCE) there were already many languages, each
unintelligible to the others. 11:1, 6

36.. God worries that people could actually build a tower high enough to
reach him (them?) in heaven. 11:4

37.. According to the Tower of Babel story, the many human languages were
created instantaneously by God. But actually the various languages evolved
gradually over long periods of time. 11:9

38.. The ridiculously long lives of the patriarchs. 11:10-32

39.. "And they returned to the land of the Philistines." But the
Philistines didn't arrive in the region of Canaan until around 1400 BCE --
600 years after Abraham's supposed migration from Ur. 21:32, 26:1, 21:32,
21:32, 8, 15, 18

1) Dishonestly quoting the skepticsannotatedbible's web
site and not attributing it to them is noted.
2) If you wish to present an argument, then you need to
do it in your own words. Quote the Scripture and then
tell me why it is wrong and then proceed to prove that
you are right about your claim. Just saying, "it
really happened another way" is not proof.
3) I am not going to play this game where you take 30
seconds to paste in info and expect me to work for
hours, or days to refute it all, just so you can take
another 30 seconds to paste in more garbage.
Besides this, I have already correct this web site on
one of their claims, to make a point. They took that
reference down and then later put it back up again.
They are not interested in truth and neither are you.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.
User: "kathryn"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 29 Dec 2004 02:04:06 PM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:o124t0dp36hg6qekljmgu8vu3k7v85a0vd@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:51:40 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:cmk3t01o89stdkqb48hf8etmfj4hn2eunn@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:20:23 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i7e3t0tscvlrces1dqc7nu7grq4nmf6not@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.


Your idiotic attempts at an attack is noted. Now maybe
you might try basing your attacks on something the
Bible actually says. Or maybe you prefer to stay
ignorant.


Here you go Dave boy...


See end of message.


1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events
that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite.
1:1-2:3

2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects
(the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to
mark
them? 1:3-5

3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8

4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive
their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11

5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating
them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11

6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon,
and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in
an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14

7.. God makes two lights: "the greater light [the sun] to rule the day,
and the lesser light [the moon] to rule the night." But the moon is not a
light, but only reflects light from the sun. And why, if God made the moon
to "rule the night", does it spend half of its time moving through the
daytime sky? 1:16

8.. "He made the stars also." God spends a day making light (before
making
the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard
day's work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of
stars.
1:16

9.. "And God set them [the stars] in the firmament of the heaven to give
light upon the earth." 1:17

10.. In verse 11, God "let the earth bring forth" the plants. Now he has
the earth "bring forth" the animals as well. So maybe the creationists
have
it all wrong. Maybe God created livings things through the process of
evolution. 1:24

11.. God gave humans dominion over every other living thing on earth.
1:26

12.. God commands us to "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the
earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over ... every living thing that
moveth upon the earth." 1:28

13.. All animals were originally herbivores. Tapeworms, vampire bats,
mosquitoes, and barracudas -- all were strict vegetarians, as they were
created by God. 1:30

14.. "God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good." He purposefully designed a system that ensures the suffering and
death of all his creatures, parasite and host, predator and prey. 1:31

15.. In Genesis 1 the entire creation takes 6 days, but the universe is
at
least 12 billion years old, with new stars constantly being formed. 1:31

16.. Humans were not created instantaneously from dust and breath, but
evolved over millions of years from simpler life forms. 2:7

17.. After making the animals, God has Adam name them all. The naming of
several million species must have kept Adam busy for a while. But animals
were not created instantaneously from the ground, but evolved over
millions
of years. And we still don't have names for all of them. Ten thousand new
species of insects are discovered and named each year. 2:18-22

18.. God curses the serpent. From now on the serpent will crawl on his
belly and eat dust. One wonders how he got around before -- by hopping on
his tail, perhaps? But snakes don't eat dust, do they? 3:14

19.. Because Adam listened to Eve, God cursed the ground and causes
thorns
and thistles to grow. Before this, according to the (false) Genesis story,
plants had no natural defenses. The rose had no thorn, cacti were
spineless,
holly leaves were smooth, and the nettle had no sting. Foxgloves,
oleander,
and milkweeds were all perfectly safe to eat. 3:17-18

20.. "There were giants in the earth in those days." Well, I suppose
it's
good to know that. But why is there no archaeological evidence for the
existence of these giants? 6:4

21.. Noah is told to make an ark that is 450 feet long. 6:14-15

22.. Whether by twos or by sevens, Noah takes male and female
representatives from each species of "every thing that creepeth upon the
earth." 7:8

23.. God opens the "windows of heaven." He does this every time it
rains.
7:11

24.. All of the animals boarded the ark "in the selfsame day." 7:13-14

25.. The flood covered the highest mountain tops (Mount Everest?) with
fifteen cubits to spare. 7:20

26.. "The windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was
restrained." This happens whenever it stops raining. 8:2

27.. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the
dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes
out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11

28.. When the animals left the ark, what would they have eaten? There
would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a
year. What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would
have gone extinct. And how did the New World primates or the Australian
marsupials find there way back after the flood subsided? 8:19

29.. Noah kills the "clean beasts" and burns their dead bodies for God.
According to 7:8 this would have caused the extinction of all "clean"
animals since only two of each were taken onto the ark. 8:20-21

30.. "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth." Although this
would have been good advice for the mythical Noah, it is deadly advice for
humankind as a whole. Overpopulation is one of our greatest problems, yet
there is nothing in the bible to address it. 9:1

31.. According to this verse, all animals fear humans. Although it is
true
that many do, it is also true that some do not. Sharks and grizzly bears,
for example, are generally much less afraid of us than we are of them. 9:2

32.. "Into your hand are they (the animals) delivered." God gave the
animals to humans, and they can do whatever they please with them. This
verse has been used by bible believers to justify all kinds of cruelty to
anmials and environmental destruction. 9:2

33.. God is rightly filled with remorse for having killed his creatures.
He even puts the rainbow in the sky to remind himself of his promise to
the
animals not to do it again. But rainbows are caused by the nature of
light,
the refractive index of water, and the shape of raindrops. There were
rainbows billions of years before humans existed. 9:13

34.. Some creationists believe that this verse refers to continental
drift, which, they say, began to occur during the days of Pelag (which
means
"division"), about 100 or so years after the flood. But many other
creationists disagree. 10:25

35.. "The whole earth was of one language." But this could not be true,
since by this time (around 2400 BCE) there were already many languages,
each
unintelligible to the others. 11:1, 6

36.. God worries that people could actually build a tower high enough to
reach him (them?) in heaven. 11:4

37.. According to the Tower of Babel story, the many human languages
were
created instantaneously by God. But actually the various languages evolved
gradually over long periods of time. 11:9

38.. The ridiculously long lives of the patriarchs. 11:10-32

39.. "And they returned to the land of the Philistines." But the
Philistines didn't arrive in the region of Canaan until around 1400 BCE --
600 years after Abraham's supposed migration from Ur. 21:32, 26:1, 21:32,
21:32, 8, 15, 18


1) Dishonestly quoting the skepticsannotatedbible's web
site and not attributing it to them is noted.

2) If you wish to present an argument, then you need to
do it in your own words. Quote the Scripture and then
tell me why it is wrong and then proceed to prove that
you are right about your claim. Just saying, "it
really happened another way" is not proof.

They can prove it happened the other way, measurable evidence. All you have
is a much translated book from a questionable source, no historian worth
their salt would take that as primary evidence.
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 29 Dec 2004 05:36:58 PM
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:04:06 +0000 (UTC), while scaling
the Mt. Everest, "kathryn" <bob@bob.com> pontificated:

1) Dishonestly quoting the skepticsannotatedbible's web
site and not attributing it to them is noted.

2) If you wish to present an argument, then you need to
do it in your own words. Quote the Scripture and then
tell me why it is wrong and then proceed to prove that
you are right about your claim. Just saying, "it
really happened another way" is not proof.


They can prove it happened the other way, measurable evidence.

That I would like to see. If you wish to claim proof,
then you need to prove your case. I'm game, but bear
in mind, we're not going to play the game where you
paste a web link in and then expect me to do hours
worth of work. In order for your argument to be
credible, you must post the argument in your own words
and prove that you are correct. I.e., you're going to
do just as much work as I am. Otherwise, how do I even
know if you actually understand what you're pasting in?

All you have
is a much translated book from a questionable source, no historian worth
their salt would take that as primary evidence.

I'm sorry dear, but you're wrong. The Bible is the
most accurate and reliable book on ancient history
there is. If you don't want to believe in God, that's
up to you, but it is accurate historically and science
proves that over and over again. The sources aren't in
question and it is primary evidence. In fact, the rule
for textual criticism is to take it at face value,
until it is disproved. That has never happened. And
you can't just call it a religious book and wave it
away. Caesar claimed to be a god. By your rule, he
didn't exist and that document can't be used as
evidence. When it comes to the amount of textual
evidence and the closeness of it to the original
writing, nothing surpasses the Bible. Much of what you
call history, is taken from documents that are
hundreds, or even over a thousand years away from the
original writing. With the Bible, we have fragments
dating to the same century as the Gospel of John, for
example and any historian worth their salt, knows that
Luke was one of the greatest documenters of history of
all time. He can take you out to a certain spot in the
water and tell you the depth and guess what? It is
confirmed today.
So please, play that outdated philosophy game, which
comes from the days when archaeology was just starting,
back to wherever you got it. It isn't true.
Do yourself a favor and pick up a copy of Wycliffe's
dictionary of Biblical archaeology. You'll see over
400 examples of evidence in that book alone.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.


User: "Family Man"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 29 Dec 2004 04:52:01 PM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:o124t0dp36hg6qekljmgu8vu3k7v85a0vd@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:51:40 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:cmk3t01o89stdkqb48hf8etmfj4hn2eunn@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:20:23 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i7e3t0tscvlrces1dqc7nu7grq4nmf6not@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.


Your idiotic attempts at an attack is noted. Now maybe
you might try basing your attacks on something the
Bible actually says. Or maybe you prefer to stay
ignorant.


Here you go Dave boy...


See end of message.


1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events
that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite.
1:1-2:3

2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects
(the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to
mark
them? 1:3-5

3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8

4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive
their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11

5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating
them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11

6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon,
and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in
an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14

7.. God makes two lights: "the greater light [the sun] to rule the day,
and the lesser light [the moon] to rule the night." But the moon is not a
light, but only reflects light from the sun. And why, if God made the moon
to "rule the night", does it spend half of its time moving through the
daytime sky? 1:16

8.. "He made the stars also." God spends a day making light (before
making
the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard
day's work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of
stars.
1:16

9.. "And God set them [the stars] in the firmament of the heaven to give
light upon the earth." 1:17

10.. In verse 11, God "let the earth bring forth" the plants. Now he has
the earth "bring forth" the animals as well. So maybe the creationists
have
it all wrong. Maybe God created livings things through the process of
evolution. 1:24

11.. God gave humans dominion over every other living thing on earth.
1:26

12.. God commands us to "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the
earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over ... every living thing that
moveth upon the earth." 1:28

13.. All animals were originally herbivores. Tapeworms, vampire bats,
mosquitoes, and barracudas -- all were strict vegetarians, as they were
created by God. 1:30

14.. "God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good." He purposefully designed a system that ensures the suffering and
death of all his creatures, parasite and host, predator and prey. 1:31

15.. In Genesis 1 the entire creation takes 6 days, but the universe is
at
least 12 billion years old, with new stars constantly being formed. 1:31

16.. Humans were not created instantaneously from dust and breath, but
evolved over millions of years from simpler life forms. 2:7

17.. After making the animals, God has Adam name them all. The naming of
several million species must have kept Adam busy for a while. But animals
were not created instantaneously from the ground, but evolved over
millions
of years. And we still don't have names for all of them. Ten thousand new
species of insects are discovered and named each year. 2:18-22

18.. God curses the serpent. From now on the serpent will crawl on his
belly and eat dust. One wonders how he got around before -- by hopping on
his tail, perhaps? But snakes don't eat dust, do they? 3:14

19.. Because Adam listened to Eve, God cursed the ground and causes
thorns
and thistles to grow. Before this, according to the (false) Genesis story,
plants had no natural defenses. The rose had no thorn, cacti were
spineless,
holly leaves were smooth, and the nettle had no sting. Foxgloves,
oleander,
and milkweeds were all perfectly safe to eat. 3:17-18

20.. "There were giants in the earth in those days." Well, I suppose
it's
good to know that. But why is there no archaeological evidence for the
existence of these giants? 6:4

21.. Noah is told to make an ark that is 450 feet long. 6:14-15

22.. Whether by twos or by sevens, Noah takes male and female
representatives from each species of "every thing that creepeth upon the
earth." 7:8

23.. God opens the "windows of heaven." He does this every time it
rains.
7:11

24.. All of the animals boarded the ark "in the selfsame day." 7:13-14

25.. The flood covered the highest mountain tops (Mount Everest?) with
fifteen cubits to spare. 7:20

26.. "The windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was
restrained." This happens whenever it stops raining. 8:2

27.. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the
dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes
out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11

28.. When the animals left the ark, what would they have eaten? There
would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a
year. What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would
have gone extinct. And how did the New World primates or the Australian
marsupials find there way back after the flood subsided? 8:19

29.. Noah kills the "clean beasts" and burns their dead bodies for God.
According to 7:8 this would have caused the extinction of all "clean"
animals since only two of each were taken onto the ark. 8:20-21

30.. "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth." Although this
would have been good advice for the mythical Noah, it is deadly advice for
humankind as a whole. Overpopulation is one of our greatest problems, yet
there is nothing in the bible to address it. 9:1

31.. According to this verse, all animals fear humans. Although it is
true
that many do, it is also true that some do not. Sharks and grizzly bears,
for example, are generally much less afraid of us than we are of them. 9:2

32.. "Into your hand are they (the animals) delivered." God gave the
animals to humans, and they can do whatever they please with them. This
verse has been used by bible believers to justify all kinds of cruelty to
anmials and environmental destruction. 9:2

33.. God is rightly filled with remorse for having killed his creatures.
He even puts the rainbow in the sky to remind himself of his promise to
the
animals not to do it again. But rainbows are caused by the nature of
light,
the refractive index of water, and the shape of raindrops. There were
rainbows billions of years before humans existed. 9:13

34.. Some creationists believe that this verse refers to continental
drift, which, they say, began to occur during the days of Pelag (which
means
"division"), about 100 or so years after the flood. But many other
creationists disagree. 10:25

35.. "The whole earth was of one language." But this could not be true,
since by this time (around 2400 BCE) there were already many languages,
each
unintelligible to the others. 11:1, 6

36.. God worries that people could actually build a tower high enough to
reach him (them?) in heaven. 11:4

37.. According to the Tower of Babel story, the many human languages
were
created instantaneously by God. But actually the various languages evolved
gradually over long periods of time. 11:9

38.. The ridiculously long lives of the patriarchs. 11:10-32

39.. "And they returned to the land of the Philistines." But the
Philistines didn't arrive in the region of Canaan until around 1400 BCE --
600 years after Abraham's supposed migration from Ur. 21:32, 26:1, 21:32,
21:32, 8, 15, 18


1) Dishonestly quoting the skepticsannotatedbible's web
site and not attributing it to them is noted.

2) If you wish to present an argument, then you need to
do it in your own words. Quote the Scripture and then
tell me why it is wrong and then proceed to prove that
you are right about your claim. Just saying, "it
really happened another way" is not proof.

Why re-invent the wheel? Obviously your fictional bible is full of holes,
contradictions and is outright delusional.

3) I am not going to play this game where you take 30
seconds to paste in info and expect me to work for
hours, or days to refute it all, just so you can take
another 30 seconds to paste in more garbage.

Don't bother, you can't refute it anyway.

Besides this, I have already correct this web site on
one of their claims, to make a point. They took that
reference down and then later put it back up again.
They are not interested in truth and neither are you.

You wouldn't know "truth" if it smacked you in the face.
.

User: "John Harlow"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 29 Dec 2004 09:28:29 AM

Besides this, I have already correct this web site on
one of their claims, to make a point. They took that
reference down and then later put it back up again.

Then post a link to that. I'd love to see it.

They are not interested in truth and neither are you.

I very much am however. Please either explain the obvious errors and
injustices of the bible, or why they aren't meant to be taken litteraly
(another justification I've heard).
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
BTW - Excellent murder weapon as a .sig!
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 29 Dec 2004 05:05:25 PM
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:28:29 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "John Harlow" <sirsausage@hotmail.com>
pontificated:

Besides this, I have already correct this web site on
one of their claims, to make a point. They took that
reference down and then later put it back up again.


Then post a link to that. I'd love to see it.

I did, in another thread. I emailed them and they took
it down. I checked after a while and it was still
removed. After quite some time, I just happened to be
on that site and thought of it again and checked and it
was back. And guess what? No email link. :) After a
while, the email link reappeared and I emailed them
again. They never responded. Gee, I wonder why? :)
Anyway, go look at the following reference:
1 Kings 4:26 / 2 Chronicles 9:25
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/

They are not interested in truth and neither are you.


I very much am however. Please either explain the obvious errors and
injustices of the bible, or why they aren't meant to be taken litteraly
(another justification I've heard).

Your comment states that you are not in search of
truth, since it assumes that there are errors and you
now want me to explain everything you think is an
error. Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Read my
response to the other person. There are rules to a
debate and if it's going to involve 30 seconds of your
time and days of mine, then I'm not interested. Prove
your claim first.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.


User: "bob young"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 11:19:01 PM
Pastor Dave wrote:

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:51:40 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:cmk3t01o89stdkqb48hf8etmfj4hn2eunn@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:20:23 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i7e3t0tscvlrces1dqc7nu7grq4nmf6not@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.


Your idiotic attempts at an attack is noted. Now maybe
you might try basing your attacks on something the
Bible actually says. Or maybe you prefer to stay
ignorant.


Here you go Dave boy...


See end of message.

1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite. 1:1-2:3

2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark
them? 1:3-5

3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8

4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11

5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11

6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14

7.. God makes two lights: "the greater light [the sun] to rule the day,
and the lesser light [the moon] to rule the night." But the moon is not a
light, but only reflects light from the sun. And why, if God made the moon
to "rule the night", does it spend half of its time moving through the
daytime sky? 1:16

8.. "He made the stars also." God spends a day making light (before making
the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard
day's work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of stars.
1:16

9.. "And God set them [the stars] in the firmament of the heaven to give
light upon the earth." 1:17

10.. In verse 11, God "let the earth bring forth" the plants. Now he has
the earth "bring forth" the animals as well. So maybe the creationists have
it all wrong. Maybe God created livings things through the process of
evolution. 1:24

11.. God gave humans dominion over every other living thing on earth. 1:26

12.. God commands us to "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the
earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over ... every living thing that
moveth upon the earth." 1:28

13.. All animals were originally herbivores. Tapeworms, vampire bats,
mosquitoes, and barracudas -- all were strict vegetarians, as they were
created by God. 1:30

14.. "God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good." He purposefully designed a system that ensures the suffering and
death of all his creatures, parasite and host, predator and prey. 1:31

15.. In Genesis 1 the entire creation takes 6 days, but the universe is at
least 12 billion years old, with new stars constantly being formed. 1:31

16.. Humans were not created instantaneously from dust and breath, but
evolved over millions of years from simpler life forms. 2:7

17.. After making the animals, God has Adam name them all. The naming of
several million species must have kept Adam busy for a while. But animals
were not created instantaneously from the ground, but evolved over millions
of years. And we still don't have names for all of them. Ten thousand new
species of insects are discovered and named each year. 2:18-22

18.. God curses the serpent. From now on the serpent will crawl on his
belly and eat dust. One wonders how he got around before -- by hopping on
his tail, perhaps? But snakes don't eat dust, do they? 3:14

19.. Because Adam listened to Eve, God cursed the ground and causes thorns
and thistles to grow. Before this, according to the (false) Genesis story,
plants had no natural defenses. The rose had no thorn, cacti were spineless,
holly leaves were smooth, and the nettle had no sting. Foxgloves, oleander,
and milkweeds were all perfectly safe to eat. 3:17-18

20.. "There were giants in the earth in those days." Well, I suppose it's
good to know that. But why is there no archaeological evidence for the
existence of these giants? 6:4

21.. Noah is told to make an ark that is 450 feet long. 6:14-15

22.. Whether by twos or by sevens, Noah takes male and female
representatives from each species of "every thing that creepeth upon the
earth." 7:8

23.. God opens the "windows of heaven." He does this every time it rains.
7:11

24.. All of the animals boarded the ark "in the selfsame day." 7:13-14

25.. The flood covered the highest mountain tops (Mount Everest?) with
fifteen cubits to spare. 7:20

26.. "The windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was
restrained." This happens whenever it stops raining. 8:2

27.. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11

28.. When the animals left the ark, what would they have eaten? There
would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a
year. What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would
have gone extinct. And how did the New World primates or the Australian
marsupials find there way back after the flood subsided? 8:19

29.. Noah kills the "clean beasts" and burns their dead bodies for God.
According to 7:8 this would have caused the extinction of all "clean"
animals since only two of each were taken onto the ark. 8:20-21

30.. "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth." Although this
would have been good advice for the mythical Noah, it is deadly advice for
humankind as a whole. Overpopulation is one of our greatest problems, yet
there is nothing in the bible to address it. 9:1

31.. According to this verse, all animals fear humans. Although it is true
that many do, it is also true that some do not. Sharks and grizzly bears,
for example, are generally much less afraid of us than we are of them. 9:2

32.. "Into your hand are they (the animals) delivered." God gave the
animals to humans, and they can do whatever they please with them. This
verse has been used by bible believers to justify all kinds of cruelty to
anmials and environmental destruction. 9:2

33.. God is rightly filled with remorse for having killed his creatures.
He even puts the rainbow in the sky to remind himself of his promise to the
animals not to do it again. But rainbows are caused by the nature of light,
the refractive index of water, and the shape of raindrops. There were
rainbows billions of years before humans existed. 9:13

34.. Some creationists believe that this verse refers to continental
drift, which, they say, began to occur during the days of Pelag (which means
"division"), about 100 or so years after the flood. But many other
creationists disagree. 10:25

35.. "The whole earth was of one language." But this could not be true,
since by this time (around 2400 BCE) there were already many languages, each
unintelligible to the others. 11:1, 6

36.. God worries that people could actually build a tower high enough to
reach him (them?) in heaven. 11:4

37.. According to the Tower of Babel story, the many human languages were
created instantaneously by God. But actually the various languages evolved
gradually over long periods of time. 11:9

38.. The ridiculously long lives of the patriarchs. 11:10-32

39.. "And they returned to the land of the Philistines." But the
Philistines didn't arrive in the region of Canaan until around 1400 BCE --
600 years after Abraham's supposed migration from Ur. 21:32, 26:1, 21:32,
21:32, 8, 15, 18


1) Dishonestly quoting the skepticsannotatedbible's web
site and not attributing it to them is noted.

2) If you wish to present an argument, then you need to
do it in your own words. Quote the Scripture and then
tell me why it is wrong and then proceed to prove that
you are right about your claim. Just saying, "it
really happened another way" is not proof.

3) I am not going to play this game where you take 30
seconds to paste in info and expect me to work for
hours, or days to refute it all, just so you can take
another 30 seconds to paste in more garbage.

Nice escape Pastor.
What you really mean is you are unable to refute any of it,
'cos, boy if you could you would be right out there!
Never mind we are used to it



Besides this, I have already correct this web site on
one of their claims, to make a point. They took that
reference down and then later put it back up again.
They are not interested in truth and neither are you.

--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17

.


User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Evidence for God? 28 Dec 2004 09:04:45 PM
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:51:40 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:cmk3t01o89stdkqb48hf8etmfj4hn2eunn@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:20:23 -0500, while scaling the
Mt. Everest, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:i7e3t0tscvlrces1dqc7nu7grq4nmf6not@4ax.com...

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:16:40 GMT, while scaling the Mt.


Your idiotic attempts at an attack is noted. Now maybe
you might try basing your attacks on something the
Bible actually says. Or maybe you prefer to stay
ignorant.


Here you go Dave boy...

See end of message.

1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite. 1:1-2:3

2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark
them? 1:3-5

3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8

4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11

5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11

6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14

7.. God makes two lights: "the greater light [the sun] to rule the day,
and the lesser light [the moon] to rule the night." But the moon is not a
light, but only reflects light from the sun. And why, if God made t