Evidences of God - Preface



 Religions > Atheism > Evidences of God - Preface

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 18 of 32

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 

18

 

19

 

20

 

21

 

22

 

23

 

24

 

25

 

26

 

27

 

28

 

29

 

30

 

31

 

32

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Jeremy"
Date: 20 Aug 2003 08:27:43 PM
Object: Evidences of God - Preface
Evidences of God - Preface
I have recently been involved in discussions that have been crossposted
in several newsgroups. Because, in all of these newsgroups, people have
asked me for my evidence that God exists, I am cross posting this thread
to all of these newsgroups, so that everyone who has been discussing on
the other threads will see and be able to converse in this thread.
Some of the items that I will be posting will be items that I have
posted before. I know this, but everyone may not have read them that
will be in this discussion, so I am reposting it.
Because of the amount of information that I plan on posting for this
discussion, I would like to make a suggestion. If you plan on posting a
reply to a single point made in the discussion, please append a suffix
(or change an existing one) to the subject line of the post. It will
make it easier to follow the threads.
Also please note that, unless I state otherwise, my postings will be
based on my beliefs. I know that there will be other people who have
differing beliefs and opinions, and that is fine.
In summary, I want to be able to have an honest, open minded discussion
on the subject. By open minded I simply mean that we look at each post,
regardless of the author, at face value. We should at least try to
understand what the author is saying before replying. I am not saying
that anyone needs to believe or accept anything that is posted, I would
just ask that we respect each other's views as being valid in their eyes.
Now I know asking Usenet posters to behave can be like asking a dog to
quit chasing cats, but at least I made the attempt.
--- Jeremy
.

User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 21 Aug 2003 10:20:47 PM
Al Klein wrote:

On 21 Aug 2003 10:19:32 -0700,

(Jon Goslee) posted
in alt.atheism:

The Bible from cover to cover is a story of Jesus Christ, old
testament and new.


*****. The OT never mentions your Jesus myth.

===>Biblicist Christians are such brainwashed dummies!

There are so many instances of this it is very
exciting. The Gospels (or good news) was given by four different
writers.....Why?


Each one contradicts the other 3. Why?

===>The author of "Mark" wrote an early story for his Gentile convert brethren,
depicting Jesus as a kind of itinerant philosopher-teacher.
The authors of "Matthew" and "Luke" decided to embellish it their own ways.
The author of "John" reflects an advanced Christos-worshiping Gentile community.
So, they all had their own reasons. But they all saw him differently. Only the
author of "John" is attempting to present him as an incarnate deity -- the
LOGOS incarnate. -- L.
.

User: "Mekkala"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 25 Aug 2003 09:35:36 AM
On 21 Aug 2003,
(Jon Goslee) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:6602b0bd.0308210919.1d6c847c@posting.google.com:

bobcrowley@optusnet.com.au (Bob Crowley) wrote in message
news:<adff117.0308210212.19cf38a9@posting.google.com>...

"JDub" <jwhipple10@attbi.the_pooch.com> wrote in message
news:<DXY0b.159390$cF.56935@rwcrnsc53>...

David wrote:

That doesn't help any since
this god still needed to see his son tortured in order to
forgive us. Why not just forgive?


Why not just forgive?

This all knowing deity made his first mistake when he gave us free
will. Wouldn'tcha know it, right from the start, man is
misbehaving. So god tries threats of eternal damnation, hell fire,
brimstone and so forth, yet man still misbehaves.
Thus, god is forced to try another strategy: the guilt trip. My son
suffered and died for your sins...please obey me!

Forgiveness is the face saving cover up of a god that really
botched the creation of heaven and earth.
Sort of like the cat the looks at you with that "I meant to do
that!" expression after slipping into the bubblebath.


We, Man, with a capital M, are the guilty party who kill each other
in war, enslave each other in concentration camps, poison each other
with poison gases, spend many times the amount on military force than
we do on helping each other, destroy the environment and waste
resources.

For this we have nobody but ourselves to blame. Blaming God is is
like Saddam Hussein blaming his overwhelmed commanders for his own
stupidity. He made his bed, and he has to lie on it. Man makes
these stupid mistakes and deliberate incidents of evil, and he has to
live with it.

Now if God is a judge who is going to hold each and every one of us
accountable for our actions, then we must all face a sentence of some
sort. At the same time God can only truly experience the human
problem by becoming human. The only way David could experience the
pain a llama might feel, but be unable to express by virtue of it's
being a llama, would be to become one for a season. Then of course
he would have to face the same fate as other llamas - being shorn
occasionally, left in the cold all night, and probably sent to the
abattoir when the time was up.

Some of the Bible stories are lengthy parables, eg. Jonah. Others
illustrate a truth in story form. So what? Memorising the planets
from the sun outwards can be told as a nonsense sentence - "My very
elderly mother just sat up near pluto."

In other words, why are the stories there? They illustrate a truth
or truths, which could no doubt be explained in legal or scientific
terms if need be, but they would then be exceedingly dull. I know
which reading I prefer - a novel or a scientific paper.

Bob Crowley.



My dear friends....

Let me start by saying WOW.....I see such anger and contempt for
Christianity, or even the notion of God. My view on the Bible is
simple, it is the perfect true word of God himself inspired and
written from the hearts of those he anointed to record his love for
mankind. You see, an understanding of the scriptures cannot come from
a mear excerpt or short study. Learning to interperet the scriptures
is a lifelong commitment.

To try to make sense out of a whole story without knowing other
passages is almost a waste of time. Not to say that there are no
messages within it (the Bible) that can be aquired by reading a few
words. But if you are jaded and your heart is hardened to even
receive the truth before you begin to read, then of course it may seem
like foolishness to the unbeliever.

The Bible from cover to cover is a story of Jesus Christ, old
testament and new. There are so many instances of this it is very
exciting. The Gospels (or good news) was given by four different
writers.....Why?

Jesus came into the world to reconcile first, his people, the Jews.
So we have the Gospel of Matthew, written by a Jewish tax collector.
I mean a Tax collector! That was the most hated type of person their
was in that day. But Matthew was converted, gave up his profession,
and followed Jesus.

Next you have the Gospel of Mark. Mark was written to minister the
Roman, fast paced and to the point. Some call the Gospel of Mark, the
turbo-charged Gospel. But you see God knows what we all need.

Next you have the Gospel of Luke. Luke was a doctor, he traveled with
Paul the apostle. Luke was written for the Greek, analitical and
descriptive. Luke is structured almost like a term paper. The Greeks
prided themselves on their science and philosophies.

And last, but certainly not least..

You have the Gospel of John. The book of love. John was written to
the Gentiles....Us. Moreover, it is suggested that new believers who
have given themselves to Christ, should first read John.

These are an example from the new testament of how God is reaching out
to minister to us any way he can, by using people who have walked in
our ways, and now turned from their sins...Not to be perfect, just
accepting the sacrifice that was given for us.


Here is just one example of the many of how the gospel of the coming
of Jesus is encoded into the old testament.

The geneology of Noah speaks of the coming of Christ and mans
redemption. The meaning of each name in Hebrew speaks a very special
message. I was so excited to learn of this.....

From Adam to Noah

1. Adam - means: Man
2. Seth - means: Appointed
3. Enosh - means: Frail, weak, mortal
4. Kenan - means: Despairing
5. Mahalalel - means: The Blessed God
6. Jared - means: Shall come down, or to come down
7. Enoch - To teach or to make aware
8. Methuselah - means: His death shall bring
9. Lamech - means: Lamentation or anguish or affliced
10. Noah - means: Comfortor or Comfort

What does all of this read as? Man was appointed by sin to be mortal
and die, despairing. But, the Blessed God shall come down and teach,
that his death shall bring the afflicted comfort.

Just from the mear understanding of what each Hebrew name means we see
the Gospel of Jesus Christ. From father and son to father and son. I
found this to be quite amazing.

Look it up for yourself if you doubt. Do your homework. I have.

You quite complacently assume that we know nothing of the Bible but bits
and pieces here and there, and that if our hardened hearts would allow
us to read further, we would see the light and praise Jesus.
I studied the Bible cover to cover, in depth, under the training of a
number of well-educated theologists, as a Christian, for some 15 years.
After all that, my heart *became* "hardened", as you call it. I became
atheist after all that, because, do you know, the Bible makes no sense
whatsoever (besides desecribing an evil and depraved deity). To get
*anything* out of it, you have to become expert at jumping through
hoops, playing word games, and practicing doublethink.
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly
realized I was talking to myself!"
--Peter O'Toole.
.

User: "Michael Morrell"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 24 Aug 2003 06:21:49 PM
I would say that God being kind enough to tell us what happened in the
time of Noah is not a pointless story at all, about God being angry. It
teaches us that we must be baptised into Christ to be saved, and there
is no other way. Baptism saves us.
michael
lascruces.bereans.org
.
User: "Weatherwax"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 25 Aug 2003 12:48:35 AM
"Michael Morrell" <mgm@mnmtek.com> wrote

I would say that God being kind enough to tell us what
happened in the time of Noah is not a pointless story at
all, about God being angry. It teaches us that we must
be baptised into Christ to be saved, and there
is no other way. Baptism saves us.

michael

The Bible stories are not nearly as stupid as the idiotic
explanations some readers come up with.
--
Wax
.

User: "David"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 24 Aug 2003 09:59:27 PM
Michael Morrell wrote:

I would say that God being kind enough to tell us what
happened in the time of Noah is not a pointless story at
all...

It is pointless when people take the _ALLEGORICAL_ flood
story and believe that it actually happened. I cannot
understand how one can commit the intellectual suicide that
it would take to believe such a story. The flood stories are
so bizarre that it is obvious it is allegorical.
--
David V.
Yosemite Llama Ranch
dave@TheLlamaRanch.com
http://www.TheLlamaRanch.com
UDP for WebTV
.

User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 24 Aug 2003 09:34:00 PM
Michael Morrell wrote:

I would say that God being kind enough to tell us what happened in the
time of Noah is not a pointless story at all, about God being angry. It
teaches us that we must be baptised into Christ to be saved, and there
is no other way. Baptism saves us.

===>From what? The Flood?
.
User: "John Vogel"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 24 Aug 2003 09:42:24 PM
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F497598.FC84AA14@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...



Michael Morrell wrote:

I would say that God being kind enough to tell us what happened in the
time of Noah is not a pointless story at all, about God being angry. It
teaches us that we must be baptised into Christ to be saved, and there
is no other way. Baptism saves us.


===>From what? The Flood?

No from destruction. The flood saved the "race" from complete destruction,
by "washing" the earth of the sinners. The baptism saves from complete
destruction, by washing our souls of sin...
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
User: "John Vogel"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story -- DIVINE COVER-UP 24 Aug 2003 10:10:48 PM
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F4979F9.8E16BCD7@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...



John Vogel wrote:

"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F497598.FC84AA14@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...



Michael Morrell wrote:

I would say that God being kind enough to tell us what happened in

the

time of Noah is not a pointless story at all, about God being angry.

It

teaches us that we must be baptised into Christ to be saved, and

there

is no other way. Baptism saves us.


===>From what? The Flood?


No from destruction. The flood saved the "race" from complete

destruction,

by "washing" the earth of the sinners. The baptism saves from complete
destruction, by washing our souls of sin...


===>That is sooo cuuute!

Thanks ;)

Too bad the original flood story is not about "washing the earth", only
about washing away ("covering up") the mistake of YHWH.
Genesis 6:7
The LORD said,
"I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land,
from man to animals to creeping things and to birds of the sky;
for I am sorry that I have made them." -- L.

You know, I never could figure that one out. How could a God who is
omnicient regret taking ANY action (especially the creation of life)? It's
not like he didn't KNOW what would happen...
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story -- DIVINE COVER-UP 25 Aug 2003 10:58:54 AM
John Vogel wrote:

"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F4979F9.8E16BCD7@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...



John Vogel wrote:

"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F497598.FC84AA14@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...



Michael Morrell wrote:

I would say that God being kind enough to tell us what happened in

the

time of Noah is not a pointless story at all, about God being angry.

It

teaches us that we must be baptised into Christ to be saved, and

there

is no other way. Baptism saves us.


===>From what? The Flood?


No from destruction. The flood saved the "race" from complete

destruction,

by "washing" the earth of the sinners. The baptism saves from complete
destruction, by washing our souls of sin...


===>That is sooo cuuute!


Thanks ;)

Too bad the original flood story is not about "washing the earth", only
about washing away ("covering up") the mistake of YHWH.
Genesis 6:7
The LORD said,
"I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land,
from man to animals to creeping things and to birds of the sky;
for I am sorry that I have made them." -- L.


You know, I never could figure that one out. How could a God who is
omnicient regret taking ANY action (especially the creation of life)? It's
not like he didn't KNOW what would happen...

===>But it IS EXACTLY like that.
A close, objective reading of the story shows that the author did not
have an "omniscient" deity in mind at all! The YHWH ELOHIM of
that fable is a bungler who never quite knows what to do or what
the consequences of his actions would be. A tinkerer, not an
omniscient "creator". The entire history depicted therein is one of
trial and error. LOTS of error.
Libertarius
=============
.




User: "TCS"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 24 Aug 2003 07:50:08 PM
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 17:21:49 -0600, Michael Morrell <mgm@mnmtek.com> wrote:

I would say that God being kind enough to tell us what happened in the
time of Noah is not a pointless story at all, about God being angry. It
teaches us that we must be baptised into Christ to be saved, and there
is no other way. Baptism saves us.

It shows that there are idiots like you who will parrot anything they're
told no matter how stupid or bizarre.
Your statement is as nonsensical as telling you that you have to smear banana
pudding all over you because the diode in the garage door blew and that
only by cheating on calculus exams can you be a good lawyer.
Start smearing!
.


User: "Mark Fox"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 18 Sep 2003 11:02:40 AM
Mani Deli <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote

freatork1@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

According to the story, Adam and Eve have two sons, one of which kills
the other. So there are three people, Adam, Eve, and Cain. The authors
then tell us that Cain "knew" his "wife." Where did SHE come from?
Let's ditch this trash and move on. - Bob.


As the originator of this thread I occasionally repeat this message in
order to hear more flames and curses. I enjoy them. Its always
amusing when a good ....

Perhaps the problem is that we expect the Bible to be something it is
not. The bible is clearly a profound document containing a message of
morality and wisdom for those who read it with an open heart.
Unfortunately, people have also attempted to use the Bible as a
geological history document and as a weapon to condemn (in some cases
even kill) their neighbors.
We misuse the ancient texts so badly that God himself came to Earth in
the form of a man to tell us personally of our error:
Matthew 22:36
"Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?" Jesus
replied: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all
your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest
commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as
yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two
commandments."
Of course in our human wisdom we did not follow God's words but
instead killed the messenger. How ironic to kill God in the name of
God. Could there possibly be a more poignant story of how self
serving we are? In can't think of one.
Gods response was: "forgive them for they know not what they do"
Even now, in the modern age, do we really listen to that story and the
wisdom it contains?

Everyone should caste their vote for the stupidest Bible story.

The story of Noah gets my vote, not only for its pervasive influence
on creationist theory but because of its utter impossibility as truth.

The message I receive from reading about Noah is that if we listen to
God then we will be ready when the storms come.
I don't care how long is a Cubit or how deep the water became.
.
User: "Weatherwax"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 18 Sep 2003 01:15:46 PM
"Mark Fox" <mark_fox_@yahoo.com> wrote in message


Perhaps the problem is that we expect the Bible to be something

it

is not. The bible is clearly a profound document containing a
message of morality and wisdom for those who read it with an
open heart.

Unfortunately, people have also attempted to use the Bible as a
geological history document and as a weapon to condemn (in
some cases even kill) their neighbors.

All you are saying is that the Bible is what you read into it.
If you want profound messages of morality and wisdom, you can
find it. If you want ignorance and bigotry. That's in there
too.
The major problem is few people know which is which. The story
about Noah contains a great deal of ignorance, and the First
Commandment which forbids us to worship other gods is bigotry.

We misuse the ancient texts so badly that God himself came to
Earth in the form of a man to tell us personally of our error:

That is an example of misusing the Bible. Not only are you
giving too great of a literal interpretation to the text, but you
are interpolating the text to fit your theological viewpoint.

Matthew 22:36
"Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?" Jesus
replied: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with

all

your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and

greatest

commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as
yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two
commandments."

In this case, the first is impossible without the second. You
cannot love God unless you love your neighbor as yourself. But
"Love your neighbor as yourself" is nearly impossible to achieve,
and is impractical.
It is much easiar to follow the Ten Commandments. Then you can
hate everybody who does not worship the same god you worship.

Of course in our human wisdom we did not follow God's words but
instead killed the messenger. How ironic to kill God in the

name of

God. Could there possibly be a more poignant story of how self
serving we are? In can't think of one.

Gods response was: "forgive them for they know not what they

do"


Even now, in the modern age, do we really listen to that story
and the wisdom it contains?


< CLIP >

The message I receive from reading about Noah is that if we

listen to

God then we will be ready when the storms come.

I don't care how long is a Cubit or how deep the water became.

The message I get from Noah, is that we can take two versions of
the same story and place them together so that they appear as one
story. Of course you get repetitions and a few contradictions,
but it can be done.
--
Wax
.
User: "Mark Fox"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 18 Sep 2003 06:36:41 PM
"Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote
Hi, Wax!

It is much easiar to follow the Ten Commandments. Then you can
hate everybody who does not worship the same god you worship.

Yes, I agree that its much easier to misinterpret the Ten Commandments
for our own convenience then it is to misinterpret Matthew 22.
Perhaps that's why public officials aren't clammering to put Matthew
22 on stone monuments in public places.
.


User: "David"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 18 Sep 2003 09:00:04 PM
Mark Fox wrote:


Perhaps the problem is that we expect the Bible to be
something it is not.

Yes! Far too many expect the bible to tell the truth and
they turn a blind eye when it doesn't.
--
David V.
Yosemite Llama Ranch
dave@TheLlamaRanch.com
http://www.TheLlamaRanch.com
UDP for WebTV
.
User: "Mark Fox"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 20 Sep 2003 04:10:33 PM
David <dave@thellamaranch.com> wrote

Mark Fox wrote:


Perhaps the problem is that we expect the Bible to be
something it is not.


Yes! Far too many expect the bible to tell the truth and
they turn a blind eye when it doesn't.

How do we know when it doesn't??
.
User: "David"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 20 Sep 2003 11:50:07 PM
Mark Fox wrote:

David <dave@thellamaranch.com> wrote

Mark Fox wrote:

Perhaps the problem is that we expect the Bible to be
something it is not.


Yes! Far too many expect the bible to tell the truth and
they turn a blind eye when it doesn't.


How do we know when it doesn't??

Start with the first line. It's a lie and it goes down hill
from there.
--
David V.
Yosemite Llama Ranch
dave@TheLlamaRanch.com
http://www.TheLlamaRanch.com
UDP for WebTV
.

User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 20 Sep 2003 07:08:03 PM
Mark Fox wrote:

David <dave@thellamaranch.com> wrote

Mark Fox wrote:


Perhaps the problem is that we expect the Bible to be
something it is not.


Yes! Far too many expect the bible to tell the truth and
they turn a blind eye when it doesn't.


How do we know when it doesn't??

===>It does when it agrees with you. ;-)
.



User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 20 Sep 2003 07:31:53 PM
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:02:40 -0700, Mark Fox wrote:

The bible is clearly a profound document containing a message of morality
and wisdom for those who read it with an open heart.

<snort> <snicker> <snirk>
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.


User: "Jonathan"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 17 Sep 2003 02:24:49 PM
Mani Deli <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<bhd8kv8vkqu5mjdq73j887jc04fc5hd0sn@4ax.com>...

On 20 Aug 2003 16:07:25 -0700,


(
) wrote:

According to the story, Adam and Eve have two sons, one of which kills
the other. So there are three people, Adam, Eve, and Cain. The authors
then tell us that Cain "knew" his "wife." Where did SHE come from?
Let's ditch this trash and move on. - Bob.


THE BIBLE SAYS ADAM AND EVE HAD OTHER CHILDREN (AFTER)....THATS WHAT
YOU GET WHEN YOU DONT READ THE WHOLE STORY.
JONATHAN
.
User: "David"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 17 Sep 2003 03:32:58 PM
Jonathan wrote:

Mani Deli <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote

(freatork1@yahoo.co.uk) wrote:

According to the story, Adam and Eve have two sons,
one of which kills the other. So there are three
people, Adam, Eve, and Cain. The authors then tell us
that Cain "knew" his "wife." Where did SHE come from?
Let's ditch this trash and move on. - Bob.


THE BIBLE SAYS ADAM AND EVE HAD OTHER CHILDREN
(AFTER)....THATS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU DONT READ THE
WHOLE STORY.

Oh, according to the christian mythology, Cain mated with
his sister? Does that mean we are all products of incest?
--
David V.
Yosemite Llama Ranch
dave@TheLlamaRanch.com
http://www.TheLlamaRanch.com
UDP for WebTV
.
User: "386sx"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 18 Sep 2003 10:52:25 AM
David wrote:

Oh, according to the christian mythology, Cain mated with his sister?
Does that mean we are all products of incest?

Technically, it means we are all the products of mating between brother
and sister. If you want to call that incest, well then you go right
ahead. You might upset some troll "pastros" around here though.
--
"He affirmed that only in man we had the beatings of the heart, that the
left side of the body was colder than the right, that men have more teeth
than women." -- John Tyndall
.

User: "Mani Deli"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 17 Sep 2003 04:22:55 PM
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:32:58 -0700, David <dave@thellamaranch.com>
wrote:

Oh, according to the christian mythology, Cain mated with
his sister? Does that mean we are all products of incest?

Probably. Its even more interesting to know that Jesus is the product
of adultery.
Tired of Modern Art? See-
http://www3.sympatico.ca/manideli/
.
User: "David"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 17 Sep 2003 07:59:11 PM
Mani Deli wrote:

David <dave@thellamaranch.com> wrote:

Oh, according to the christian mythology, Cain mated
with his sister? Does that mean we are all products of
incest?


Probably. Its even more interesting to know that Jesus is
the product of adultery.

At least Zeus came down and took care of business himself.
The christian god had to send a flunky to do it for him.
--
David V.
Yosemite Llama Ranch
dave@TheLlamaRanch.com
http://www.TheLlamaRanch.com
UDP for WebTV
.
User: "Weatherwax"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 18 Sep 2003 02:24:38 AM
"David" <dave@thellamaranch.com> wrote in message
news:3f69035d$1@news.sti.net...

Mani Deli wrote:

David <dave@thellamaranch.com> wrote:

Oh, according to the christian mythology, Cain mated
with his sister? Does that mean we are all products of
incest?


Probably. Its even more interesting to know that Jesus is
the product of adultery.


At least Zeus came down and took care of business himself.
The christian god had to send a flunky to do it for him.

But Zeus did disguise himself at times. With Europa his took the
image of a bull. With Leda, he took the image of a swan, which
made for one of the most beautiful poems in English literature:
Leda and the Swan
A sudden blow: the great wings beating still
Above the staggering girl, her thighs caressed
By the dark webs, her nape caught in his bill,
He holds her helpless breast upon his breast.
How can those terrified vague fingers push
The feathered glory from her loosening thighs?
And how can body, laid in that white rush,
But feel the strange heart beating where it lies?
A shudder in the loins engenders there
The broken wall, the burning roof and tower
And Agamemnon dead.
Being so caught up,
So mastered by the brute blood of the air,
Did she put on his knowledge with his power
Before the indifferent beak could let her drop?
William Butler Yeats
--
Wax
.
User: "David"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 18 Sep 2003 09:02:55 PM
Weatherwax wrote:

"David" <dave@thellamaranch.com> wrote

Mani Deli wrote:

David <dave@thellamaranch.com> wrote:

Oh, according to the christian mythology, Cain
mated with his sister? Does that mean we are all
products of incest?


Probably. Its even more interesting to know that
Jesus is the product of adultery.


At least Zeus came down and took care of business
himself. The christian god had to send a flunky to do
it for him.


But Zeus did disguise himself at times. With Europa his
took the image of a bull. With Leda, he took the image
of a swan, which made for one of the most beautiful poems
in English literature:

Nice poem. Zeus may have disguised himself, but he was man
enough to take care of things himself.
--
David V.
Yosemite Llama Ranch
dave@TheLlamaRanch.com
http://www.TheLlamaRanch.com
UDP for WebTV
.





User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 17 Sep 2003 04:23:43 PM
Jonathan wrote:

Mani Deli <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<bhd8kv8vkqu5mjdq73j887jc04fc5hd0sn@4ax.com>...

On 20 Aug 2003 16:07:25 -0700,


(
) wrote:

According to the story, Adam and Eve have two sons, one of which kills
the other. So there are three people, Adam, Eve, and Cain. The authors
then tell us that Cain "knew" his "wife." Where did SHE come from?
Let's ditch this trash and move on. - Bob.


THE BIBLE SAYS ADAM AND EVE HAD OTHER CHILDREN (AFTER)....THATS WHAT
YOU GET WHEN YOU DONT READ THE WHOLE STORY.

===>So, is THAT how they had more children?
By not reading the whole story?
Like a story about contraception?
.

User: "Mani Deli"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 17 Sep 2003 04:20:59 PM
On 17 Sep 2003 12:24:49 -0700,
(Jonathan)
wrote:

Mani Deli <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<bhd8kv8vkqu5mjdq73j887jc04fc5hd0sn@4ax.com>...

On 20 Aug 2003 16:07:25 -0700,


(
) wrote:

According to the story, Adam and Eve have two sons, one of which kills
the other. So there are three people, Adam, Eve, and Cain. The authors
then tell us that Cain "knew" his "wife." Where did SHE come from?
Let's ditch this trash and move on. - Bob.


THE BIBLE SAYS ADAM AND EVE HAD OTHER CHILDREN (AFTER)....THATS WHAT
YOU GET WHEN YOU DONT READ THE WHOLE STORY.
JONATHAN

Hope you believe the story and that you are a dirty rotten sinner on
account of it.
Tired of Modern Art? See-
http://www3.sympatico.ca/manideli/
.


User: "dave e"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 27 Aug 2003 10:05:30 AM
Mani Deli <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<bhd8kv8vkqu5mjdq73j887jc04fc5hd0sn@4ax.com>...

On 20 Aug 2003 16:07:25 -0700,


(
) wrote:

According to the story, Adam and Eve have two sons, one of which kills
the other. So there are three people, Adam, Eve, and Cain. The authors
then tell us that Cain "knew" his "wife." Where did SHE come from?
Let's ditch this trash and move on. - Bob.


As the originator of this thread I occasionally repeat this message in
order to hear more flames and curses. I enjoy them. Its always
amusing when a good thread raises the swellings of holy hemorrhoids
and threats of hell..

Everyone should caste their vote for the stupidest Bible story.

I like the story of the virgin birth, only because it is so easy to
imagine the following alternate (and more credible) interpretation:
Mary is an unmarried teenager living in the first century, engaged to
a man from a good family (he's a descendent of King David), but not
yet married. They've never had sex. One morning she wakes up feeling
nauseus, and having missed her period. Imagine her dilemna. Should
she
A) Tell her fiancee that she's been impregnated by the Holy Spirit,
with the son of God, in fulfillment of the Hebrew prophets?
or
B) Admit that she's been sleeping around with every other Joe in town
but the one she's engaged to.
She chooses A.
Joseph is no fool. He knows her true character. But he feels rather
embarassed for both of them.
(Matthew 1:19) "And Joseph her husband, being a righteous man and not
wanting to disgrace her, planned to send her away secretly."
But then a second option occurs to him: he can claim to have had his
own Angelic visitation, and lend his support to her story.
(Matthew 1:20-21)
20 But when he had considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord
appeared to him in a dream, saying, "Joseph, son of David, do not be
afraid to take Mary as your wife; for the Child who has been conceived
in her is of the Holy Spirit. 21 "She will bear a Son; and you shall
call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins."
So they both tell their families that Mary has been knocked up by the
Holy Spirit, and the rest is Biblical history.
Dave
.
User: "John Vogel"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 27 Aug 2003 10:56:55 AM
"dave e" <dgenglish@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10ffa4e4.0308270705.1405e55b@posting.google.com...

Mani Deli <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote in message

news:<bhd8kv8vkqu5mjdq73j887jc04fc5hd0sn@4ax.com>...

On 20 Aug 2003 16:07:25 -0700,


(
) wrote:

According to the story, Adam and Eve have two sons, one of which kills
the other. So there are three people, Adam, Eve, and Cain. The authors
then tell us that Cain "knew" his "wife." Where did SHE come from?
Let's ditch this trash and move on. - Bob.


As the originator of this thread I occasionally repeat this message in
order to hear more flames and curses. I enjoy them. Its always
amusing when a good thread raises the swellings of holy hemorrhoids
and threats of hell..

Everyone should caste their vote for the stupidest Bible story.


I like the story of the virgin birth, only because it is so easy to
imagine the following alternate (and more credible) interpretation:

Mary is an unmarried teenager living in the first century, engaged to
a man from a good family (he's a descendent of King David), but not
yet married. They've never had sex. One morning she wakes up feeling
nauseus, and having missed her period. Imagine her dilemna. Should
she

A) Tell her fiancee that she's been impregnated by the Holy Spirit,
with the son of God, in fulfillment of the Hebrew prophets?

or

B) Admit that she's been sleeping around with every other Joe in town
but the one she's engaged to.

She chooses A.

Joseph is no fool. He knows her true character. But he feels rather
embarassed for both of them.

(Matthew 1:19) "And Joseph her husband, being a righteous man and not
wanting to disgrace her, planned to send her away secretly."

But then a second option occurs to him: he can claim to have had his
own Angelic visitation, and lend his support to her story.

(Matthew 1:20-21)
20 But when he had considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord
appeared to him in a dream, saying, "Joseph, son of David, do not be
afraid to take Mary as your wife; for the Child who has been conceived
in her is of the Holy Spirit. 21 "She will bear a Son; and you shall
call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins."

So they both tell their families that Mary has been knocked up by the
Holy Spirit, and the rest is Biblical history.

Dave

I see a few problems with this scenario. One of these problems would be in
Joseph's reaction. If Joseph WAS a righteous man, he would not have lied
about Mary's extramarital affair, he would have sent her away privately (and
not shamed her). If Joseph was NOT a righteous man, he would not have really
cared about shaming her and would have taken her before the council, to
relieve himself from his bond. According to other writings (extrabiblical
scripture) Joseph did NOT want to marry Mary to begin with... though I don't
believe the bible specifies this, if you read the scripture you can get a
sense of the truth, that this was an arranged marriage. I seriously doubt
Joseph would have lied for/about Mary eithor way.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
User: "Weatherwax"

Title: Re: the stupidest Bible story 27 Aug 2003 04:11:24 PM
"John Vogel" <jvogel2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message


"dave e" <dgenglish@hotmail.com> wrote in message


I like the story of the virgin birth, only because it is so
easy to imagine the following alternate (and more
credible) interpretation:

Mary is an unmarried teenager living in the first
century, engaged to a man from a good family (he's a
descendent of King David), but not yet married.
They've never had sex. One morning she wakes up
feeling nauseus, and having missed her period. Imagine
her dilemna. Should she

A) Tell her fiancee that she's been impregnated by the
Holy Spirit, with the son of God, in fulfillment of the
Hebrew prophets?

or

B) Admit that she's been sleeping around with every
other Joe in town but the one she's engaged to.

She chooses A.

Joseph is no fool. He knows her true character. But
he feels rather embarassed for both of them.

(Matthew 1:19) "And Joseph her husband, being a
righteous man and not wanting to disgrace her, planned
to send her away secretly."

But then a second option occurs to him: he can claim to
have had his own Angelic visitation, and lend his support
to her story.

(Matthew 1:20-21)
20 But when he had considered this, behold, an angel
of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying,
"Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary
as your wife; for the Child who has been conceived
in her is of the Holy Spirit. 21 "She will bear a Son;
and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His
people from their sins."

So they both tell their families that Mary has been
knocked up by the Holy Spirit, and the rest is Biblical
history.

Dave


I see a few problems with this scenario. One of these
problems would be in Joseph's reaction. If Joseph
WAS a righteous man, he would not have lied
about Mary's extramarital affair, he would have sent
her away privately (and not shamed her). If Joseph
was NOT a righteous man, he would not have really
cared about shaming her and would have taken her
before the council, to relieve himself from his bond.
According to other writings (extrabiblical scripture)
Joseph did NOT want to marry Mary to begin with...
though I don't believe the bible specifies this, if you
read the scripture you can get a sense of the truth,
that this was an arranged marriage. I seriously doubt
Joseph would have lied for/about Mary eithor way.

Your concept of a "righteous man" sickens me.
According to you, Joseph should have turned Mary over to the
council where she would have been publicly labeled a whole, or
stoned to death.
I see righteousness as including compassion and forgiveness.
--
Wax
.




  Page 18 of 32

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 

18

 

19

 

20

 

21

 

22

 

23

 

24

 

25

 

26

 

27

 

28

 

29

 

30

 

31

 

32

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3817     pg.2125