| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Xomicron" |
| Date: |
02 Jun 2004 09:03:21 AM |
| Object: |
Evil Halliburton |
Take note, all you people who are always trying to say that this
administration is responsible for Halliburton getting so many government
contracts.
_________________________________________________________
HERE WE GO WITH HALLIBURTON AGAIN
This is turning into a farce, but then again that's a liberal specialty.
The media has once again climbed aboard the Halliburton merry-go-round.
This is the oil services company that Vice President ***** Cheney headed
before he took a gigantic pay cut to become President Bush's running
mate. The latest accusation: ***** Cheney coordinated a huge government
contract for Iraq.
The "smoking gun" is apparently an e-mail over a year old stating that
the contract for Halliburton was "coordinated with the VP's office."
Cheney's spokesman said the e-mail was sent as a heads-up in
anticipation of the controversy over awarding the contract, since he
used to head the firm. That's it. Nothing really to it.
Once again ... Halliburton was awarded this services contract under the
Clinton administration. In the 1990s the Army wanted to get outside
help handling the logistics associated with actions overseas. That's
when the Army came up with LOGCAP, the U.S. Army Logistics Civil
Augmentation Program. Halliburton first won the competitive bid for
LOGCAP in 1992. It lost the contract in 1997. Who was president in
1997? Someone named Bill Clinton. Halliburton was out, but Clinton
needed help with his logistics efforts in Bosnia. Who did he turn to?
Halliburton? He gave another contract to Halliburton with NO
COMPETITIVE BIDDING. Halliburton then won the competitive bidding
process again in 2001. So .. which party seems to favor Halliburton?
In 1992 and in 2001, under Republican presidents, Halliburton wins
competitive bids for LOGCAP. In 1997, under a Democratic president,
Halliburton gets the contract without a bid.
So ... Bush haters. Get over it. If anyone was showing favoritism to
Halliburton, it was Clinton, not Bush and Cheney.
It's interesting that the Bush-haters think Cheney is some sort of evil
mastermind ripping off the government and enriching his buddies at
Halliburton, while at the same time accusing him of being stupid enough
to coordinate a huge contract with a company with which they say he has
a conflict of interest. So...which is it?
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
02 Jun 2004 09:14:42 AM |
|
|
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote
Once again ... Halliburton was awarded this services
contract under the Clinton administration.
*****.
Now you idiots are pretending that Clinton was President
in 2003?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Corey Is Naked" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
02 Jun 2004 01:06:48 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3tOdnUt1W6g2QiDdRVn-vg@comcast.com>...
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote
Once again ... Halliburton was awarded this services
contract under the Clinton administration.
*****.
Now you idiots are pretending that Clinton was President
in 2003?
talking politics with Xomicron is like teaching a monkey about
advanced caculus. he'll never understand true meaning
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
02 Jun 2004 08:41:20 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Xomicron"
*plonk*
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo SMP Linux kernel 2.6.6 <-- rolled my own
.
|
|
|
| User: "relic" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
03 Jun 2004 10:14:23 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Xomicron"
*plonk*
You're tiring of him, huh.
--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
03 Jun 2004 10:54:53 AM |
|
|
"relic" <reply.to@the.group> wrote in
news:jfHvc.27534$wO4.683@twister.socal.rr.com:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Xomicron"
*plonk*
You're tiring of him, huh.
He can't take the heat.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
03 Jun 2004 11:40:43 AM |
|
|
relic wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Xomicron"
*plonk*
You're tiring of him, huh.
I've had the loony in the bin since his second post in here.
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo SMP Linux kernel 2.6.6 <-- rolled my own
.
|
|
|
| User: "relic" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
03 Jun 2004 11:43:04 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
relic wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Xomicron"
*plonk*
You're tiring of him, huh.
I've had the loony in the bin since his second post in here.
I've wondered why he excluded the cola loonie bin from his cross-posting.
Most of his list is full of crazies.
--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DaveNOSPAM" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
03 Jun 2004 05:50:07 PM |
|
|
Here's the thing though -- Bill Clinton didn't start a dubious war for
the SOLE PURPOSE of rewarding Helliburton and other defense companies
for their campaign donations.
And the reason Halliburton gets no-bid work assignments is,
admittedly, the stuff they do is fairly exclusive. You can't exactly
pick up the yellow pages and find "Burning Oil-Well Firefighters"
One other thing -- Cheney IS an evil mastermind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
03 Jun 2004 06:01:28 PM |
|
|
(DaveNOSPAM) wrote in
news:1a9cab55.0406031450.5a297df7@posting.google.com:
Here's the thing though -- Bill Clinton didn't start a dubious war for
the SOLE PURPOSE of rewarding Helliburton and other defense companies
for their campaign donations.
Neither did Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DaveNOSPAM" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
03 Jun 2004 09:53:03 PM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2i9ou7Fl3cqfU1@uni-berlin.de>...
janklowicz24@yahoo.com (DaveNOSPAM) wrote in
news:1a9cab55.0406031450.5a297df7@posting.google.com:
Here's the thing though -- Bill Clinton didn't start a dubious war for
the SOLE PURPOSE of rewarding Helliburton and other defense companies
for their campaign donations.
Neither did Bush.
Wow. Is it true what they say about ignorance being bliss?
.
|
|
|
| User: "relic" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
04 Jun 2004 10:26:03 AM |
|
|
DaveNOSPAM wrote:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<2i9ou7Fl3cqfU1@uni-berlin.de>...
janklowicz24@yahoo.com (DaveNOSPAM) wrote in
news:1a9cab55.0406031450.5a297df7@posting.google.com:
Here's the thing though -- Bill Clinton didn't start a dubious war
for the SOLE PURPOSE of rewarding Helliburton and other defense
companies for their campaign donations.
Neither did Bush.
Wow. Is it true what they say about ignorance being bliss?
You tell us. Are you blissfull too?
--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Poster Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
03 Jun 2004 06:06:28 PM |
|
|
On 3 Jun 2004 15:50:07 -0700, (DaveNOSPAM)
wrote:
Here's the thing though -- Bill Clinton didn't start a dubious war for
the SOLE PURPOSE of rewarding Helliburton and other defense companies
for their campaign donations.
And the reason Halliburton gets no-bid work assignments is,
admittedly, the stuff they do is fairly exclusive. You can't exactly
pick up the yellow pages and find "Burning Oil-Well Firefighters"
Actually you can. Lots of them. Try Calgary or Dallas under "Oil"
and "Safety." BTW, Safety Boss rules!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
02 Jun 2004 04:10:55 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 14:03:21 GMT, <J6lvc.306$vO1.3128@nnrp1.uunet.ca> Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
Take note, all you people who are always trying to say that this
administration is responsible for Halliburton getting so many government
contracts.
_________________________________________________________
HERE WE GO WITH HALLIBURTON AGAIN
This is turning into a farce, but then again that's a liberal specialty.
The media has once again climbed aboard the Halliburton merry-go-round.
This is the oil services company that Vice President ***** Cheney headed
before he took a gigantic pay cut to become President Bush's running
mate. The latest accusation: ***** Cheney coordinated a huge government
contract for Iraq.
The "smoking gun" is apparently an e-mail over a year old stating that
the contract for Halliburton was "coordinated with the VP's office."
Cheney's spokesman said the e-mail was sent as a heads-up in
anticipation of the controversy over awarding the contract, since he
used to head the firm. That's it. Nothing really to it.
Once again ... Halliburton was awarded this services contract under the
Clinton administration. In the 1990s the Army wanted to get outside
help handling the logistics associated with actions overseas. That's
when the Army came up with LOGCAP, the U.S. Army Logistics Civil
Augmentation Program. Halliburton first won the competitive bid for
LOGCAP in 1992. It lost the contract in 1997. Who was president in
1997? Someone named Bill Clinton. Halliburton was out, but Clinton
needed help with his logistics efforts in Bosnia. Who did he turn to?
Halliburton? He gave another contract to Halliburton with NO
COMPETITIVE BIDDING. Halliburton then won the competitive bidding
process again in 2001. So .. which party seems to favor Halliburton?
In 1992 and in 2001, under Republican presidents, Halliburton wins
competitive bids for LOGCAP. In 1997, under a Democratic president,
Halliburton gets the contract without a bid.
So ... Bush haters. Get over it. If anyone was showing favoritism to
Halliburton, it was Clinton, not Bush and Cheney.
It's interesting that the Bush-haters think Cheney is some sort of evil
mastermind ripping off the government and enriching his buddies at
Halliburton, while at the same time accusing him of being stupid enough
to coordinate a huge contract with a company with which they say he has
a conflict of interest. So...which is it?
You will confuse leftist kooks with facts. Be prepared for the whining and
wailing they will start.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evil Halliburton |
02 Jun 2004 04:19:27 PM |
|
|
"James Roberts" <jimbo12@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2igsb0ln9oke2jr52k2gcghh54lp4h3o09@4ax.com...
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 14:03:21 GMT, <J6lvc.306$vO1.3128@nnrp1.uunet.ca>
Xomicron
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
Take note, all you people who are always trying to say that this
administration is responsible for Halliburton getting so many government
contracts.
_________________________________________________________
HERE WE GO WITH HALLIBURTON AGAIN
This is turning into a farce, but then again that's a liberal specialty.
The media has once again climbed aboard the Halliburton merry-go-round.
This is the oil services company that Vice President ***** Cheney headed
before he took a gigantic pay cut to become President Bush's running
mate. The latest accusation: ***** Cheney coordinated a huge government
contract for Iraq.
The "smoking gun" is apparently an e-mail over a year old stating that
the contract for Halliburton was "coordinated with the VP's office."
Cheney's spokesman said the e-mail was sent as a heads-up in
anticipation of the controversy over awarding the contract, since he
used to head the firm. That's it. Nothing really to it.
Once again ... Halliburton was awarded this services contract under the
Clinton administration. In the 1990s the Army wanted to get outside
help handling the logistics associated with actions overseas. That's
when the Army came up with LOGCAP, the U.S. Army Logistics Civil
Augmentation Program. Halliburton first won the competitive bid for
LOGCAP in 1992. It lost the contract in 1997. Who was president in
1997? Someone named Bill Clinton. Halliburton was out, but Clinton
needed help with his logistics efforts in Bosnia. Who did he turn to?
Halliburton? He gave another contract to Halliburton with NO
COMPETITIVE BIDDING. Halliburton then won the competitive bidding
process again in 2001. So .. which party seems to favor Halliburton?
In 1992 and in 2001, under Republican presidents, Halliburton wins
competitive bids for LOGCAP. In 1997, under a Democratic president,
Halliburton gets the contract without a bid.
So ... Bush haters. Get over it. If anyone was showing favoritism to
Halliburton, it was Clinton, not Bush and Cheney.
It's interesting that the Bush-haters think Cheney is some sort of evil
mastermind ripping off the government and enriching his buddies at
Halliburton, while at the same time accusing him of being stupid enough
to coordinate a huge contract with a company with which they say he has
a conflict of interest. So...which is it?
You will confuse leftist kooks with facts.
In order to have a chance of doing that, he'd have to come up with some
facts. So far, he hasn't.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|