| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
10 Jun 2005 12:04:06 AM |
| Object: |
Evolution And Genocide |
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
"science." They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
The modern world laughs at the Bible. "Myths and legends." "Full of
errors." The Biblical account of the creation of the universe in six
days not more than 10,000 years ago is laughed at by most (but not all)
scientists. In place of the Garden of Eden, modern scientists and
politicians have given us smog and smut, Hiroshima and homelessness.
The 20th century marks the triumph of secularism. Three centuries ago,
all the great nations of Western Civilization were openly Christian
nations. Today these same nations are openly atheistic. God and His Law
have no authority. No longer is man seen as created in the Image of
God. He is just a random mutation; a meaningless conglomeration of
chemicals. Social customs are also seen as meaningless and arbitrary.
"But at least we are no longer oppressed by the Bible," some will still
say.
They are on the road to death.
The 20th century is (not surprisingly) the most violent in history. The
existentialist philosopher Jean Paul Sartre put it well: "If I am god,
then my neighbor is the devil." Research led by Prof. R.J. Rummel at
the University of Hawaii has calculated that nearly 200 million human
beings have been deliberately killed by secular governments in this
century alone. A greater percentage of the human race has been murdered
- by governments - than any previous century.[1]
Followers of secularism have learned their lessons. They are not afraid
to kill their families, their own children, even themselves. Drugs,
sex, gangs, and alcohol bring escape from a meaningless, atheistic
world.
Followers of Christ may not have learned their lessons, but at least
they know Who the Teacher is. True Christians take the Bible seriously.
They believe its record of human history; they obey its laws. They work
for the full social embodiment of Biblical Creationism as seen in the
words of the Prophet Micah:
And it will come about in the last days
That the mountain of the House of the LORD
Will be established as the chief of the mountains
And it will be raised above the hills
And the peoples will stream to it.
And many nations will come and say,
"Come, let us go up to the mountain of the LORD
And to the House of the God of Jacob,
That He may teach us about His ways
And that we may walk in His paths."
For from Zion will go forth the Law
Even the Word of the LORD from Jerusalem.
And He will judge between many peoples
And render decisions for mighty, distant nations.
Then they will hammer their swords into plowshares
And their spears into pruning hooks;
Nation will not lift up sword against nation
And never again will they train for war.
And each of them will sit under his
Vine and under his fig tree,
With no one to make them afraid.
For the LORD of hosts has spoken.
Though all the peoples walk
Each in the name of his god,
As for us, we will walk
In the Name of the LORD our God
forever and ever.
In that day, saith the LORD, will I assemble her that halteth,
and I will gather her that is driven out,
and her that I have afflicted;
And I will make her that halted a remnant,
and her that was cast far off a strong nation:
and the LORD shall reign over them in mount Zion
from henceforth, even for ever.
Micah 4:1-4
We can call this the "Vine & Fig Tree" vision. "The Mountain of the
Lord" is a reference to the Garden of Eden: Micah's use of it here
speaks of the re-creation of the world into a Garden-Temple; a future
age of peace, secure property, and restored Edenic conditions.
We can also call this perspective "Patriarchy." Feminists hate the
word, but anyone who would believe in a literal Garden of Eden would
probably also try to convince men to become sons of the Patriarch
Abraham (Galatians 3:7,29) and to organize society Patriarchally (by
families) rather than politically (by conquest). This is in fact the
agenda of "Vine & Fig Tree."
You don't have to tell me that many who call themselves "followers of
Christ" or "students of Scripture" have denied that the Bible speaks
authoritatively and infallibly of a past six-day creation, or of the
future Edenification of the Earth. I think they're wrong. They don't
want to appear to be "unscientific." They regularly "vote" for
politicians in order to take vengeance on their enemies. Why do they
call themselves "Christians"?
In sharp contrast to this "Vine & Fig Tree" perspective which we find
in the Bible, we have the "Survival of the Fittest," embraced by
Fascism, Socialism, Communism, and the nationalism, militarism,
materialism, and cutthroat, State-buttressed "competition" of what is
sometimes called "capitalism."
You don't have to tell me that many who call themselves "Darwinists" or
"scientific" have denied that the Evolutionary world-view requires
racism, totalitarianism, lawlessness, and the Nazification of the
Earth. I think they're wrong.
Let's be consistent. If you believe something about the Bible, then be
consistent. It's the Creator of the universe speaking, or it's a joke.
"Vine & Fig Tree" imagery pervades the Bible. Christianity is a
religion of service, not conquest. Who can seriously maintain that the
Ethical World-View of Abraham, Moses, Isaiah, and Jesus is the same as
that of Darwin, Hitler, Marx, Mussolini, or Rockefeller?
But Jesus says if we are not for Him, we are against Him (Matthew
12:30). If we are not seeking to establish a Biblical culture, we are
unwittingly working for the establishment of a totalitarian,
homosexual, racist empire. We are enemies of Jesus.
Many people do not think of themselves as being enemies of Jesus just
because they believe in Evolutionism. They have been told that this
theory is "scientific." Doesn't Jesus want us to be "scientific"?
Before the "Enlightenment," scientists were Christian. In fact, science
can be said to exist only in Biblical cultures. Isaac Newton wrote more
books about the Bible than he did on physics. They believed science was
possible because the creation was a product of an orderly God. The
question we ask for now is, Why did scientists all of a sudden abandon
Biblical Creationism and embrace the theory of evolution?
Here's the answer in a nutshell: It wasn't "the facts." When evolution
swept the world, there were no "facts" to support it.[2] It was
supported by a faith - a faith against God; a desire to get out from
under His Law as recorded in the Bible.
Origin of a "New" Religion
Fable: In 1831 a divinity school drop-out began formulating the tenets
of a bizarre new religion that, playing on the hopes and fears of the
post-Christian world, and embraced by dictators and industrialists
around the world, would eventually become the largest pseudo-scientific
religious cult in the modern age. Without his degree in theology, and
lacking a degree in any natural science, he set sail to gather
anecdotes from nature to illustrate his new religion.
His timing was perfect. Men and nations were rebelling against the
Christianity of the Catholics and the Reformers. A "re-birth" of
Greco-Roman Caesarism - a pagan view of nature, and an elitist,
stratified view of social classes - left men and women panting for some
new religion that would spell freedom from responsibility under God and
yet still present an aura of "scientific respectability."
At last the creed was formulated. Drawing from various ancient
religions - from that of the Pharaohs of Egypt, the Emperors of Babylon
and China, the philosopher-kings of Greece, and the Caesars of Rome -
our seminary drop-out finally published his Confession of Faith. On
November 24, 1859, the first edition was released and by sundown every
single copy had been zealously purchased by devoted throngs of
pre-publication converts.
Fact: The Seminary drop-out was Charles Darwin; the book was The Origin
of Species; the rest is history.
Sure, we took some liberties with the story - but only in that we
presented the facts in a perspective somewhat unlike the one most of us
are taught in the State's schools.
It is clear (and we have demonstrated it elsewhere) that - far from
being "proven" - the difficulties in Darwin's thesis were - to use
Joseph Hooker's word - "appalling"; the task of finding "evidence" to
"prove" the theory was, to quote Dobzhansky, "the paramount task which
biologists faced in the closing decades of the 19th century."[3] It is
thus also clear that the devout fervor which surrounded the publication
of Darwin's work was not "scientific," but religious to the core.
Or perhaps we might say, "anti-religious." For most men of the 19th
century, "religion" was just another word for "Christianity."
Granted, many who embraced Darwin rejected much in the institutional
church which is itself "anti-Christian." We join the Evolutionists in
opposing "the Church." But many evolutionists also self-consciously
opposed the Bible. They had knowledge - perhaps a vague premonition,
perhaps a studied understanding - that the Bible was utterly opposed to
the kind of lawless, self-centered, materialistic lives they wanted to
lead. Darwin "liberated" them. We oppose them. We reject the hidden
agenda of these "Social Darwinists."
Motivation for Embracing Evolution: Darwin's Reception
It is not our purpose to prove that all who believe in Evolution are
Nazis. As we said above, many reject "Christianity" because of what is
done in the name of Christ by "christians" who do not really want
Micah's prophecy to come true. What is important to understand is that
the great majority of those who shouted "Hosanna" to Darwin were
motivated by greed, class hatred, militarism, and a thirst for
political power - to say nothing of their "private" (sexual) lives. The
broad cultural acceptance which Darwin received[4] was generated by
people who hold ideas which are diametrically opposed to the Bible's
"Vine & Fig Tree" imagery, and, hopefully, to the ideals which you
yourself hold. Recognizing what motivated an acceptance of Evolutionism
may help you see why you should reject Fascist Evolutionism and embrace
Radical Creationism.
RACISM Few people are aware that one of the reasons William Jennings
Bryan opposed the teaching of Evolution in public schools was that he
feared the teaching of racism. This is because few people are aware of
how racist non-Christian scientists had become by 1859.[5] John S.
Haller, Jr., has demonstrated that virtually all 19th-century
evolutionists believed in the evolutionary superiority of the white
race and the inferiority of others, especially the Negro race.[6] There
may have been some evolutionists who opposed the slave trade, but they
generally held - with Darwin himself - that the Negro was a backward
race, doomed to become extinct in future evolutionary competition with
the more favored races.
Racism is an easy justification for war. We will see this below; we can
see it in the words of Darwin himself:
I could show fight [sic] on natural selection having done more for the
progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what
risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago, of being
overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is? The
more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow
in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant
date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been
eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.[7]
What a pleasant thought!
OK; so racism is no longer as trendy as it was a hundred years ago.[8]
Still, ostensibly non-racist Bible-bashers continue telling us that
"Evolution was immediately accepted by scientists of the day as true"
and that we too should reject Biblical Patriarchy and bow before the
shrine of Darwin. But if scientists had not been motivated by racism,
Evolutionism might not have been so unanimously acclaimed.
What else motivated the "universal acceptance of Evolution"?
ANTI-FAMILIAL SEX In the Bible, the Family is the central unit of
social organization. The discipline and self-sacrifice required by
Biblical Laws governing the Family produces competence, social energy,
and an ability to deal with frustrations without resorting to
violence.[9]
In stark contrast to this view of life, marriage, and the sexes, is a
view which legitimizes and even extols the idea of immediate sexual
gratification, using anyone[10] of either sex[11] to achieve desired
pleasures. Prostitution, homosexuality, promiscuity, pedophilia, and
incest are not forbidden in the modern world. And in a world which is
evolving toward the unknown, empowered by the unthinking, there is no
basis for forbidding anything. "All is permitted," as Dostoyevsky
observed.
The Marquis de Sade declared that if sexual gratification could be
obtained either by dominating and torturing another, or by being so
abused, then it is good to do so. His writings preceded Darwin's by 50
years, but many who embraced Darwin found therein a "scientific"
justification for sadism, masochism, and other forms of deviance from
Christian Family forms. As Darwin noted,
A man who has no assured and no present belief in the existence of a
personal God or a future existence with retribution and rewards, can
have for his rule of life, as far as I can see, only to follow those
impulses and instincts which are the strongest or which seem to him the
best ones.
What seemed best to the Marquis de Sade was power over others. Whips
and chains excite some; still others, perhaps in a graphic and ritual
display of the "truth" of Evolutionism, gain sexual gratification
through intercourse with animals. As we move from Anti-Family Sex to a
third motivation for rejecting the Bible and embracing Evolutionism,
ask yourself the question, "What would my life be like if those
practicing these kinds of 'alternative life styles' were to gain
political power over me and my Family?" "What will the next generation
act like if these people write their school text-books?"[12]
FASCISM The desire for sexual "liberation" and the quest for God-like
power over others are admitted to be the prime motivations for belief
in the non-Christian religion of Meaningless Cosmic Evolutionism.
Aldous Huxley, grandson of "Darwin's bulldog," Sir Thomas Huxley, has
frankly confessed,
I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning; consequently
assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find
satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no
meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in
pure metaphysics, he is also concerned to prove that there is no valid
reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do, or why his
friends should not seize political power and govern in the way that
they find most advantageous to themselves. . . . For myself, the
philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of
liberation, sexual and political.
Gertrude Himmelfarb, observing what we saw above under "Racism," has
noted that
From the "preservation of favored races in the struggle for life," it
was a short step to the preservation of favored individuals, classes,
or nations - and from their preservation to their glorification. Social
Darwinism has often been understood in this sense: as a philosophy
exalting competition, power, and violence over convention, ethics, and
religion. Thus it has become a portmanteau of nationalism, imperialism,
militarism, and dictatorship, of the cults of the hero, the superman,
and the master race.
Recent expressions of this philosophy, such as Mein Kampf, are,
unhappily, too familiar to require exposition here. And it is by an
obvious process of analogy and deduction that they are said to derive
from Darwinism. Nietzsche predicted that this would be the consequence
if the Darwinian theory gained general acceptance:
If the doctrines of sovereign Becoming, of the liquidity of all . . .
species, of the lack of any cardinal distinction between man and animal
- doctrines which I consider true but deadly - are hurled into the
people for another generation . . . then nobody should be surprised
when . . . brotherhoods with the aim of robbery and exploitation of the
non-brothers . . . will appear on the arena of the future.
Himmelfarb is right in saying that such conclusions are arrived at by
"an obvious process of analogy and deduction." She is dreaming when she
asserts that the connections between Evolutionism and totalitarianism
are "too familiar to require exposition here." They are not familiar.
The connections are suppressed.
The self-centered "ME-generation" of the late 20th century is utterly
disconnected from the ideological movements of the early 20th century.
The State's schools have sent Secular Humanism's voluminous
failures[13] down the Orwellian "Memory Hole."
Volume after volume has poured from the publishing houses describing
every phase of the Hitler regime, but their writers are so timidly
afraid of being classed as anti-evolutionary "fundamentalists" by the
high-priests of Evolutionism that one may search through their books by
the hundreds and scarcely find a mention of evolution or Charles
Darwin.
Nevertheless, the rise of war and fascism in the 20th century is
inescapably attributable to the rise of Evolutionism; and the rise of
Evolutionism is attributable to the propaganda machines of the Emperors
who loved the Theory of Evolution precisely because it was useful in
justifying their total war against Eden.
But then, perhaps the connections are familiar enough: Richard
Hofstadter's book, Social Darwinism and American Thought,[14] records
the great chorus of voices which united in praising the word of Darwin
for the light it bestows on how nations, businesses, and relations
between economic classes should be governed. Wallbank and Taylor's
text, Civilization Past and Present,[15] evidences their conclusion
that Darwin's theory of the "survival of the fittest" "became a vogue
that swept western thought in the late nineteenth century. It . . .
became a convenient doctrine for justifying various economic and
political theories." Nietzsche, for example,
ridiculed democracy and socialism for protecting the worthless and weak
and hindering the strong. Social Darwinism and the antidemocratic cult
of naked power, as preached by advocates like Nietzsche, were laying
the foundations of fascism, which would one day plunge the world into
the most terrible convulsion in its history.
Ashley Montagu comments on an inflammatory book by Freiderich von
Bernhardi, Germany and the Next War:
"War," declared Bernhardi, "is a biological necessity;" it "is as
necessary as the struggle of the elements of Nature;" it "gives a
biologically just decision, since its decisions rest on the very nature
of things." "The whole idea of arbitration represents a presumptuous
encroachment on the natural laws of development," for "what is right is
decided by the arbitration of war." In proof thereof such notions of
Darwin's as "The Struggle for Existence," "Natural Selection," and the
"Survival of the Fittest" are invoked with sententiousness quite
military both in logic and in sense. According to Bernhardi, it is
plainly evident to anyone who makes a study of plant and animal life
that "war is a universal law of nature." This declaration and
fortification of Germany's will to war - for it had the highest
official sanction and approval - was published in 1911. Three years
later the greatest holocaust the world had ever known was launched. . .
..
Mussolini was strengthened in his belief that violence was basic to
social transformation by the philosophy of Nietzsche. Mussolini's
attitude was completely dominated by Evolutionism. In public utterances
he repeatedly used the Darwinian catchwords while he mocked at
perpetual peace: it would only hinder the evolutionary process.
Likewise Hitler based his politics on Darwin. Jews must be segregated,
he urged in Mein Kampf, to avoid mixed marriages; were they to occur,
all nature's efforts "to establish an evolutionary higher stage of
being may thus be rendered futile."
Sir Arthur Keith, an evolutionist, writing just after World War II,
observed,
The German Fuhrer, as I have consistently maintained, is an
evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany
conform to the theory of evolution. . . .
To see evolutionary measures and tribal morality being applied
vigorously to the affairs of a great modern nation, we must turn again
to Germany of 1942. We see Hitler devoutly convinced that evolution
produces the only real basis for a national policy. . . . The means he
adopted to secure the destiny of his race and people were organized
slaughter, which has drenched Europe in blood. . . . Such conduct is
highly immoral as measured by every scale of ethics, yet Germany
justifies it; it is consonant with tribal or evolutionary morality.
Germany has reverted to the tribal past, and is demonstrating to the
world, in their naked ferocity, the methods of evolution.
If Marx was not "converted" by the preaching of Darwin, he was
certainly "sanctified" by it. Jacques Barzun[16] notes that
In an age of social Darwinism, the combination of the ideas of
struggle, of historical evolution, and of progress proved irresistible.
The Marxists became merely a sect in the larger church . . . .
Marx wished to dedicate his book Das Kapital to Darwin, but Darwin
declined the offer, thinking it would have an adverse effect on the
popularity of his own books.
He had little to worry about. While Modernism was sweeping the Bible
under the rug, Evolutionism literally swept the globe. And its chief
propagandists were Hitler, Mussolini, and their totalitarian ilk, who,
early in their "careers," were well-respected by the United States
aristocracy because they were "scientific" social reformers who
defended "law and order."[17] Nazism may have been (temporarily) forced
underground, but the anti-Christian world-and-life-view it so
successfully propagated remains the centerpiece of the Dominant
Culture.[18] The Christian Patriarch can have no part in it.[19]
"CAPITALISM" Social Darwinism in Economics is perhaps more familiar to
some. Use the State to put your competitors out of business; ethics
must not stand in the way of the "Survival of the Fittest."
The railroad magnate James J. Hill, manipulating to get more railways
under his control, said that "the fortunes of railroad companies are
determined by the law of the survival of the fittest."
Andrew Carnegie, who made his fortune in the State-protected steel
industry, describes his conversion to Evolutionism upon reading Darwin
and Herbert Spencer:
I remember that light came as in a flood and all was clear. Not only
had I got rid of theology and the supernatural, but I had found the
truth of evolution.
John D. Rockefeller, who, like so many, attempted to seduce Christians
into Evolutionist harlotry, propagated his religion in Christian Sunday
School classes. His "testimony" was inspiring:
The growth of a large business is merely a survival of the fittest. . .
.. This is not an evil tendency in business. It is merely the working
out of a law of nature and a law of God.
Needless to say, the "God" of John D. Rockefeller and Adolph Hitler is
not the God of Micah and Jesus.
But these are the roots of corporate fascism in America.
They are also the roots of Racism
.. . . and we are now seeing the fruit of this deadly tree.
George Gaylord Simpson, one of the highest of Evolutionism's high
priests, who ministered in the parish of Harvard University, has
pontificated that Darwin
finally and definitely established evolution as a fact, no longer a
speculation or an alternative hypothesis for scientific investigation.
This is a lie.
If we are "normal" or "average" Americans, then we have been taught
this lie. We are continually bombarded with lies about Man as god and
the State as Savior. And we believe these lies. Only if we are radical
creationists are we cleansing our minds of lies and becoming effective
in standing against the violence, fascism, and racism of the Modern
World. We are surrounded by the dead and dying, victims of Darwin and
the Secular Humanists, and yet we think that we will not be touched and
that God will not hold us accountable.
And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they
should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not
believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
2 Thessalonians 2:12
Cosmic meaninglessness is a lie.
Political totalitarianism is a lie.
Sexual "freedom" is a lie.
War is a lie.
"The Truth shall make you free."
Jesus came to bring the "salvation" described by the Old Testament
prophets, which preeminently meant a decentralized spread of peace and
wholeness across the globe, free of secular militarism and Humanistic
empires. God's will would be done on earth as it is in heaven. The
Prophet Micah said people would one day put God's Law into practice,
beat their swords into plowshares, and be free from the despotic
genocidal tendencies of would-be gods, sitting peacefully under their
"Vine & Fig Tree." Don't wait for heaven; The end of evolutionism is
NOW!
NOTES
(1) Death by Government, published by Rutgers University in 1995. The
figure does not include murder by non-governmental agents. In the
United States alone, over 30 million children have been murdered by
their parents since 1973. The rates in China are higher. The average
Russian woman has had nine abortions.
(2) Even secularists admit this. Prof. Philip Johnson of the Law School
at Berkeley argues that if the facts are put on trial (and the jury is
not from Los Angeles!) Darwin would be convicted. See his book, Darwin
on Trial, 1985. Or judge for yourself. Read just one Creationist book.
Scientific Creationism is a good start. The facts simply do not support
the anti-Biblical position.
(3) Hooker was a famous scientist who lived in Darwin's day. Dobzhansky
was a modern scientist, widely acknowledged as one of the leading
defenders of Evolutionism.
(4) and still maintains: "What? You believe in Genesis?! Everybody
knows that Evolution is a scientific fact!!"
(5) In the middle ages, scientists were Christians. Isaac Newton wrote
more books about the Bible than he did about physics. But after the
"Renaissance" (the re-birth of paganism among philosophers) and the
"Enlightenment" (the acceptance of paganism by politicians), Christian
influence declined.
(6) Outcasts from Evolution: Scientific Attitudes of Racial
Inferiority, 1859-1900, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1971.
(7) Have we forgotten the full title of Darwin's book [of course we
have]: The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection; or, the
Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Memory is so
convenient. A diploma is bliss.
(8) Or so we are led to believe by politicians who claim to solve
social problems by their magic legislative wands.
(9) J.D. Unwin, "Monogamy as a Condition of Social Energy," The Hibbert
Journal, XXV:663-77; George Gilder, Sexual Suicide, NY: Quadrangle/New
York Times Book Co., 1973.
(10) or any thing, depending on how you classify animals.
(11) of any age
(12) Yes, ask this question quickly, for the next generation is already
buying their guns.
(13) Two World Wars head the list.
(14) Boston: Beacon Press, 1955.
(15) Scott, Foresman and Co., 1961.
(16) Darwin, Marx, Wagner, Doubleday, 1958.
(17) Catholics and Mormons have their theological differences, but they
will work together against abortion. American "capitalists" and German
"socialists" had their differences, but they could work together
against the Authority of the Bible and for a "modern," "scientific"
world. At the end of World War II, thousands of Nazi scientists were
given false identities and brought into the U.S. Military-Industrial
Complex. (Christopher Simpson, Blowback, 1987.) America has been
characterized by a fascist economy fueled by a Darwinian ideology. As
our ideology become sheer nihilism, it remains to be seen how our
fascist state will evolve.
(18) While Feminists bow before the altar of "Freedom from Biblical
Patriarchy," Nazis hide behind it, snickering at these "weaker
vessels."
(19) Members of "mainstream" Christian denominations are bugged by the
occasional presence of teams of Mormon missionaries at their door; at
the turn of the century, missionaries for the religion of Evolution
were in your face like pollen. Jehovah's Witnesses are persecuted by
most governments, barely tolerated by the rest; Darwin's witnesses are
accredited and funded, because their doctrines buttress the power of
the State. But perhaps a military metaphor is more appropriate than a
religious one: these are soldiers, spies, and agents of disinformation.
We cannot serve two captains (Matthew 6:24; Hebrews 2:10).
http://members.aol.com/XianAnarch/humanism/evol_genocide.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 01:39:25 AM |
|
|
<wordsoftruth114@email.com> wrote in message
news:1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
flame bait
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
12 Jun 2005 05:11:13 AM |
|
|
astounded us with: news:1118359198.929707.221170
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie
Well done! With your opening line you "lie for Jesus"
Evolution is observable and testable, therefore, it is not a theory, it is
science. Therefore, let's apply the scientific method to "creation".
Uh oh, it doesn't work, I guess there's only so many tests you can run on
"*****", the results being inconclusive in this case, other than it's
definitely *****.
--
Phÿltêr
AA#1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 12:21:22 AM |
|
|
wrote in news:1118359198.929707.221170
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
(snip)
It's amazing how much ***** you can dump into the USENET.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Hovnanian" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
11 Jun 2005 03:24:08 AM |
|
|
Woden wrote:
wordsoftruth114@email.com wrote in news:1118359198.929707.221170
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
(snip)
It's amazing how much ***** you can dump into the USENET.
Its the modern version of the crazy guy, standing on a street corner,
screaming at everyone.
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fast wine, loose cars, old women.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
11 Jun 2005 09:26:34 PM |
|
|
Paul Hovnanian <Paul@Hovnanian.com> wrote in news:42AA5958.6027B902
@Hovnanian.com:
Woden wrote:
wordsoftruth114@email.com wrote in news:1118359198.929707.221170
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
(snip)
It's amazing how much ***** you can dump into the USENET.
Its the modern version of the crazy guy, standing on a street corner,
screaming at everyone.
Well, at least it's bit quieter !
--
Jez, MBA.,
Country Dancing and Advanced Astrology, UBS.
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
11 Jun 2005 09:25:45 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:1118359198.929707.221170
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie
As if a fucking turd like you would know eh ?
(Cross-posted groups snipped)
Fucking troll.
--
Jez, MBA.,
Country Dancing and Advanced Astrology, UBS.
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 12:16:18 AM |
|
|
In article <1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> writes:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
their genocidal domination.
Right. Thousands of working biologists use the concept daily,
and hundreds of research articles are published in journals
like "The Journal of Evolutionary Biology", "Nature",
"Science", and "The Journal of Organic Evolution" --
all with the sole motive of giving rightwing rulers
a justification for taking over another Ira^H^H^H country.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 03:02:39 PM |
|
|
In article <1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> writes:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
"science."
They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
You are absolutely correct. And the bad news is that all
of us have become addicted to this so-called "science".
Like it or not, the Secular Imperialists chose wisely
when they settled on "science" as a means to seduce
God-fearing people away from the Truth. Well they
forsaw that once a people becomes accustomed to the
seductive pleasures "science" tempts us with, it
would be nearly imposible to go back.
But "nearly impossible" is not "impossible", and the
good news is that we CAN turn away from "science".
We can reject the blandishments and the false
ease. It won't be easy, but if we take it one
small step at a time, we CAN do it. And it
will have been worth it.
We should all start by burning our computers.
You go first.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Lister" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 04:03:53 PM |
|
|
(Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:d8ca2f$be3$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
In article <1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
wordsoftruth114@email.com writes:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the
world have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and
extending their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested
interest in propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have
found it a convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many
sincere Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be
compatible with the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out
of sync with "science."
They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
You are absolutely correct. And the bad news is that all
of us have become addicted to this so-called "science".
Like it or not, the Secular Imperialists chose wisely
when they settled on "science" as a means to seduce
God-fearing people away from the Truth. Well they
forsaw that once a people becomes accustomed to the
seductive pleasures "science" tempts us with, it
would be nearly imposible to go back.
But "nearly impossible" is not "impossible", and the
good news is that we CAN turn away from "science".
We can reject the blandishments and the false
ease. It won't be easy, but if we take it one
small step at a time, we CAN do it. And it
will have been worth it.
We should all start by burning our computers.
You go first.
LOL! Good one. Can I borrow it?
--
Republican Health Plan: Don't Get Sick
Guantanamo: The Gulag of Our Time
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 04:42:05 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns96715C9019B2Bretsildivad33hotmail@68.6.19.6> Dave Lister <retsildivad33@hotmail.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:d8ca2f$be3$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
In article <1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
wordsoftruth114@email.com writes:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the
world have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and
extending their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested
interest in propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have
found it a convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many
sincere Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be
compatible with the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out
of sync with "science."
They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
You are absolutely correct. And the bad news is that all
of us have become addicted to this so-called "science".
Like it or not, the Secular Imperialists chose wisely
when they settled on "science" as a means to seduce
God-fearing people away from the Truth. Well they
forsaw that once a people becomes accustomed to the
seductive pleasures "science" tempts us with, it
would be nearly imposible to go back.
But "nearly impossible" is not "impossible", and the
good news is that we CAN turn away from "science".
We can reject the blandishments and the false
ease. It won't be easy, but if we take it one
small step at a time, we CAN do it. And it
will have been worth it.
We should all start by burning our computers.
You go first.
LOL! Good one. Can I borrow it?
Sure. That is, if I can borrow:
Republican Health Plan: Don't Get Sick
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
11 Jun 2005 04:17:15 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> writes:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
"science."
They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
You are absolutely correct. And the bad news is that all
of us have become addicted to this so-called "science".
Like it or not, the Secular Imperialists chose wisely
when they settled on "science" as a means to seduce
God-fearing people away from the Truth. Well they
forsaw that once a people becomes accustomed to the
seductive pleasures "science" tempts us with, it
would be nearly imposible to go back.
But "nearly impossible" is not "impossible", and the
good news is that we CAN turn away from "science".
We can reject the blandishments and the false
ease. It won't be easy, but if we take it one
small step at a time, we CAN do it. And it
will have been worth it.
We should all start by burning our computers.
You go first.
-- cary
|Yes Cary, we can start by burning our computers. Then we cut off our
electricity and other utilities, do no watch TV or listen to Radio. We
must not use any vehicle which has wheels and certainly not aeroplanes.
So it is back to the jungle for us but we can keep our Bibles. But
watch out for talking snakes.
B C.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vladimir Makarenko" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
11 Jun 2005 05:22:24 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> writes:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
"science."
They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
You are absolutely correct. And the bad news is that all
of us have become addicted to this so-called "science".
Like it or not, the Secular Imperialists chose wisely
when they settled on "science" as a means to seduce
God-fearing people away from the Truth. Well they
forsaw that once a people becomes accustomed to the
seductive pleasures "science" tempts us with, it
would be nearly imposible to go back.
But "nearly impossible" is not "impossible", and the
good news is that we CAN turn away from "science".
We can reject the blandishments and the false
ease. It won't be easy, but if we take it one
small step at a time, we CAN do it. And it
will have been worth it.
We should all start by burning our computers.
You go first.
-- cary
|Yes Cary, we can start by burning our computers. Then we cut off our
electricity and other utilities, do no watch TV or listen to Radio. We
must not use any vehicle which has wheels and certainly not aeroplanes.
So it is back to the jungle for us but we can keep our Bibles.
As our hands will be busy to cling to trees we'll need tails to hold
Bibles. I hope the author of "intelligent design" included the
appropriate genes in his blueprints.
But who is going to provide Bibles supply?
VM.
But
watch out for talking snakes.
B C.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
12 Jun 2005 01:36:29 PM |
|
|
Vladimir Makarenko wrote:
bernard_connor@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> writes:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
"science."
They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
You are absolutely correct. And the bad news is that all
of us have become addicted to this so-called "science".
Like it or not, the Secular Imperialists chose wisely
when they settled on "science" as a means to seduce
God-fearing people away from the Truth. Well they
forsaw that once a people becomes accustomed to the
seductive pleasures "science" tempts us with, it
would be nearly imposible to go back.
But "nearly impossible" is not "impossible", and the
good news is that we CAN turn away from "science".
We can reject the blandishments and the false
ease. It won't be easy, but if we take it one
small step at a time, we CAN do it. And it
will have been worth it.
We should all start by burning our computers.
You go first.
-- cary
|Yes Cary, we can start by burning our computers. Then we cut off our
electricity and other utilities, do no watch TV or listen to Radio. We
must not use any vehicle which has wheels and certainly not aeroplanes.
So it is back to the jungle for us but we can keep our Bibles.
As our hands will be busy to cling to trees we'll need tails to hold
Bibles. I hope the author of "intelligent design" included the
appropriate genes in his blueprints.
But who is going to provide Bibles supply?
VM.
But
watch out for talking snakes.
B C.
We arrive in the jungle with our Bibles. But we must discard our clothes as they involve evil science. So back to fig leaves. I always wondered how they kept them in position. We cannot use needles and thread as they also invlove science, besides the inevitable flip-flop would cause immodesty. I suppose that we would have to stick them on with gum from a gum tree.
B C.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
12 Jun 2005 01:41:58 PM |
|
|
This is my third attempt. We arrive in the jungle with our bibles but
we must discard our clothes as they are made with evil science. So we
must make do with fig leaves. I always wondered how they kept them in
position. We cannot use needles and thread as they involve
science,besides the inevitable flip flop would be offensive to modesty.
I guess that we would have to stick them on with gum from a gum tree.
B C.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
13 Jun 2005 03:49:09 PM |
|
|
In article <1118506635.061215.38290@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> writes:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <1118359198.929707.221170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> writes:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
"science."
They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
You are absolutely correct. And the bad news is that all
of us have become addicted to this so-called "science".
Like it or not, the Secular Imperialists chose wisely
when they settled on "science" as a means to seduce
God-fearing people away from the Truth. Well they
forsaw that once a people becomes accustomed to the
seductive pleasures "science" tempts us with, it
would be nearly imposible to go back.
But "nearly impossible" is not "impossible", and the
good news is that we CAN turn away from "science".
We can reject the blandishments and the false
ease. It won't be easy, but if we take it one
small step at a time, we CAN do it. And it
will have been worth it.
We should all start by burning our computers.
You go first.
-- cary
|Yes Cary, we can start by burning our computers. Then we cut off our
electricity and other utilities, do no watch TV or listen to Radio. We
must not use any vehicle which has wheels and certainly not aeroplanes.
So it is back to the jungle for us but we can keep our Bibles. But
watch out for talking snakes.
Oh, I haven't drunk that heavily in quite some time.
You do realize that I was making fun of the original post, yes?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Hit-and-run troll. Do not feed. |
10 Jun 2005 06:44:28 AM |
|
|
K.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 02:53:49 AM |
|
|
On 09 Jun 2005, dropped trou, farted, whirled, then shouted:
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
their genocidal domination.
<irrelevant groups snipped>
If you substituted "Christianity" for "The Theory of Evolution" your
statement would actually be true.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Plonked by Jason Gastrich for all eternity...
Lovingly plonked by Roger Pearse
______________
"I'm sickened by all religions. Religion has divided people. I don't think
there's any difference between the pope wearing a large hat and parading
around with a smoking purse and an African painting his face white and
praying to a rock."
[Howard Stern]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 03:10:38 PM |
|
|
On 9 Jun 2005 17:04:06 -0700, wrote:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
Why do you lie, liar?
because it is "scientific" so much as because the empires of the world
Liar
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
Liar
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
Liar
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Liar
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
Liar
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
Liar
"science." They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
Liar
What do you imagine you are achieving by posting this endless stream
of deliberate lies to those who know just how false they are, moron?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Del" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
11 Jun 2005 08:09:47 AM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On 9 Jun 2005 17:04:06 -0700, wrote:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
Why do you lie, liar?
because it is "scientifi c" so much as because the empires of the world
Liar
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
Liar
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
Liar
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Liar
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
Liar
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
Liar
"science." They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
Liar
Very convincing "argument."
What do you imagine you are achieving by posting this endless stream
of deliberate lies to those who know just how false they are, moron?
What do you imagine _you_ are achieving by posting
your endless stream of flammage? Do you think you are
persuading anyone this way? I wouldn't care myself except
you do it as if you were some official spokesmodel for atheists
and you do it from alt.atheism. If you thought what you did
made atheists appear to be assholes would you knock it off?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nivlem" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
11 Jun 2005 06:56:24 PM |
|
|
On 11 Jun 2005 01:09:47 -0700, "Del" <jfacts@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On 9 Jun 2005 17:04:06 -0700, wrote:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Theory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
Why do you lie, liar?
because it is "scientifi c" so much as because the empires of the world
Liar
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and extending
Liar
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
Liar
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sincere
Liar
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
Liar
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
Liar
"science." They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
Liar
Very convincing "argument."
What do you imagine you are achieving by posting this endless stream
of deliberate lies to those who know just how false they are, moron?
What do you imagine _you_ are achieving by posting
your endless stream of flammage? Do you think you are
persuading anyone this way? I wouldn't care myself except
you do it as if you were some official spokesmodel for atheists
and you do it from alt.atheism. If you thought what you did
made atheists appear to be assholes would you knock it off?
You don't convince anyone of anything via usenet, I've
found. Besides, you fundy dingbats are very, very
repetitive, and not actually welcome to come and proselytize
on alt. atheism, where I am reading this. So since it's
futile, and you insist on going where you're not wanted, we
may as well have a bit of fun bashing you. I presume this is
all Chris does. The quality of sameness some of his posts
have when responding to drooling, mentally defective
religious fanatics is merely tit for tat. Since the headers
don't seem very apropriate to the thread, I'm going to trim
them and spoil some of the troll's fun. Maybe you'll see
this, maybe you won't. I don't actually give a *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Del" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
13 Jun 2005 11:49:19 AM |
|
|
Nivlem wrote:
On 11 Jun 2005 01:09:47 -0700, "Del" <jfacts@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On 9 Jun 2005 17:04:06 -0700, wrote:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
The Th eory of Evolution is a lie which is popularly believed not
Why do you lie, liar?
because it is "scientifi c" so much as because the empires of the world
Liar
have found the idea helpful in buttressing thier power and exte nding
Liar
their genocidal domination. Powerful men have had a vested interest in
Liar
propagating this faith, and the masses they dominate have found it a
convenient excuse for ignoring God's commandments. Many sin cere
Liar
Christians believe that the theory of evolution must be compatible with
Liar
the Bible because the Bible couldn't possibly be out of sync with
Liar
"science." They must come to see that "science" is a euphemism for
Secular Humanism's Genocidal Imperialism.
Liar
Very convincing "argument."
What do you imagine you are achieving by posting this endless stream
of deliberate lies to those who know just h ow false they are, moron?
What do you imagine _you_ are achieving by posting
your endless stream of flammage? Do you think you are
persuading anyone this way? I wouldn't care myself except
you do it as if you were some official spokesmodel for atheists
and you do it from alt.atheism. If you thought what you did
made atheists appear to be assholes would you knock it off?
You don't convince anyone of anything via usenet, I've
found.
Hope springs eternal. Actually lots of people's views are
motified in usenet, if not usually those of the one
you engage in debate with.
Besides, you fundy dingbats
Excuse me, but did you read what I said? Why would a
"fundy dingbat" care about him making atheists look
bad? Why do you automatically assume that any criticism
of an atheist here must be from a fundy? I'm an atheist
and I happen to care how people who go out of their
way to identify themselves as atheists--and even pretend
to speak for atheists--come across to other people.
Don't _you_? You really wouldn't mind how someone
who pretended to speak for atheists, came across?
are very, very
repetitive, and not actually welcome to come and proselytize
on alt. atheism, where I am reading this. So since it's
futile, and you insist on going where you're not wanted, we
may as well have a bit of fun bashing you.
Well as I pointed out, I am not who you assume I am.
I am an atheist. But you raise an interesting point.
If it is not all right to crosspost to a.a. isn't also not
all right to cross post to religious groups?
I presume this is
all Chr is does. The quality of sameness some of his posts
have when responding to drooling, mentally defective
religious fanatics is merely tit for tat.
By tit for tat" do you mean descending to the level of
a worst case fundy and responding in that manner?
Like "a drooling, mentally defective religious
fanatic," but from an "atheist" pov?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 11:08:53 AM |
|
|
On 9 Jun 2005 17:04:06 -0700, wrote:
EVOLUTION AND GENOCIDE
Oh, shut the ***** up, Raytard. I'll lay odds you don't even understand
most of the ***** you plagiarize.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 12:24:53 AM |
|
|
On 9 Jun 2005 17:04:06 -0700, wrote:
The Theory of Evolution is a lie
On what scientific evidence do you conclude this?
---
"This is how liberty dies: with thunderous applause"
- Padme Amidala, Episode III
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 12:37:40 AM |
|
|
In article <idnha1p8ov5q93v9g69vpisg8dr1r67npl@4ax.com> raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> writes:
Xref: news.arizona.edu alt.atheism:377070 rec.org.mensa:32260 soc.culture.russian:32789 soc.history.war.misc:32904
On 9 Jun 2005 17:04:06 -0700, wrote:
The Theory of Evolution is a lie
On what scientific evidence do you conclude this?
Why, because some nasty people believed in it. Obviously
if unpleasant people hold to some theory, that theory
must be wrong (ignore that Newton behind the curtain)
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution And Genocide |
10 Jun 2005 11:10:45 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:37:40 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <idnha1p8ov5q93v9g69vpisg8dr1r67npl@4ax.com> raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> writes:
Xref: news.arizona.edu alt.atheism:377070 rec.org.mensa:32260 soc.culture.russian:32789 soc.history.war.misc:32904
On 9 Jun 2005 17:04:06 -0700, wrote:
The Theory of Evolution is a lie
On what scientific evidence do you conclude this?
Why, because some nasty people believed in it. Obviously
if unpleasant people hold to some theory, that theory
must be wrong (ignore that Newton behind the curtain)
If a belief is false because nasty people subscribe to it, then
Christianity is the biggest lie of all. Not that it isn't
anyway........
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
