| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"IKnowHimDoYou" |
| Date: |
22 May 2004 11:01:12 AM |
| Object: |
Evolution-The Great Lie |
Evolution-The Great Lie
The evolutionary religionist fanatics try and tell us(sans evidence) that
evolution means a massive increase in genetic information that is produced
by chance variation and differential reproductive success leading upward
and onward to you.
They leave out the question of where did these genetic instructions come
from in the first instance or where did the first complete set of
instrictions come from(and they had to be complete and not partial) or how
did the DNA driver come about by itself? These crucial inquiries are
simply brushed aside because there is no evidence of chance vairation or
differential reproductive success other than fanatical speculation based
on unjustified extrapolation.
The theory of evolution is not a theory at all(this is part of the great
lie) it is simply an opinion by preoffered by those who hate God and do
not want to be accountable to Him. It certainly is not real science where
the actions of chance variation and differential reproductive success can
be demonstrated and reproduced at will for all to examine.
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion years
for it to devolop one of its own....
.
|
|
| User: "R Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 11:35:45 AM |
|
|
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com...
Evolution-The Great Lie
The evolutionary religionist fanatics try and tell us(sans evidence) that
evolution means a massive increase in genetic information that is produced
by chance variation and differential reproductive success leading upward
and onward to you.
Crazed religionist evolutionist fanatic that I am, you're actually speaking
to Aristotle's Scala Natura in which living organisms are arranged in an
immutable hierarchy. This Pagan notion was later adopted by the Christian
church because it fit in quite nicely with doctrine: Humans are near the top
of the ladder with the angels and God above them. Evolution, as you well
know, is not a linear progression, but is more likened to an ever branching
bush that consists of organisms arranged in clades. There is overwhelming
and consistent evidence for this cladistic arrangement in both extant and
fossil species. There is no emperical evidence for a 6000 year old earth
created in six days. You need to re-think the false belief systems that you
operate under in the light of reality.
They leave out the question of where did these genetic instructions come
from in the first instance or where did the first complete set of
instrictions come from(and they had to be complete and not partial) or how
did the DNA driver come about by itself? These crucial inquiries are
simply brushed aside because there is no evidence of chance vairation or
differential reproductive success other than fanatical speculation based
on unjustified extrapolation.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago. There
is evidence of life after that. So, it happened. Abiogenisis concerns itself
with pre-cellular chemosmotic processes and their relation to
self-replicating nucleotide sequences. Evolution concerns itself with the
mechanisms responsible for change and diversity of self-replicating
nucleotide sequences over time. In order to be investigated these mechanisms
must be of natural rather than supernatural cause. You, however, are free to
indulge you superstitious and supernatural religious fantasies as you wish.
Those of us who understand the nature of science have no such freedom.
The theory of evolution is not a theory at all(this is part of the great
lie) it is simply an opinion by preoffered by those who hate God and do
not want to be accountable to Him. It certainly is not real science where
the actions of chance variation and differential reproductive success can
be demonstrated and reproduced at will for all to examine.
You obviously don't understand (or more likely, don't choose to understand)
the nature of scientific theories. Scientific theories are naturalistic,
materialistic explanations for natural phenomena based upon empirical
evidence. Because they have no ability to operate on the supernatural, God
or gods are not mentioned. You are erecting a false dichotomy: if you're not
for me, you're against me. Such is not necessary the case, as you well know.
Many empirical scientists are Christians.
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion years
for it to devolop one of its own....
The analogy is interesting, superficially, but false. Your computer is the
product of empirical science - it was not created in six days. Your
"operating system" has bugs in it because it causes you to lie for its sake.
You are a paradox and are ultimately self-contradictory. You just don't
(won't) realize it. Your very human behavior is an understandable adaptation
to your environment. In other words, it sucks to be you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "+Church of The Painful Truth+" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 12:20:32 PM |
|
|
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BjLrc.565967$Ig.496070@pd7tw2no...
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com...
1 Evolution-The Great Lie
The evolutionary religionist fanatics try and tell us(sans evidence)
that
evolution means a massive increase in genetic information that is
produced
by chance variation and differential reproductive success leading upward
and onward to you.
Crazed religionist evolutionist fanatic that I am, you're actually
speaking
to Aristotle's Scala Natura in which living organisms are arranged in an
immutable hierarchy. This Pagan notion was later adopted by the Christian
church because it fit in quite nicely with doctrine: Humans are near the
top
of the ladder with the angels and God above them. Evolution, as you well
know, is not a linear progression, but is more likened to an ever
branching
bush that consists of organisms arranged in clades. There is overwhelming
and consistent evidence for this cladistic arrangement in both extant and
fossil species. There is no emperical evidence for a 6000 year old earth
created in six days. You need to re-think the false belief systems that
you
operate under in the light of reality.
They leave out the question of where did these genetic instructions come
from in the first instance or where did the first complete set of
instrictions come from(and they had to be complete and not partial) or
how
did the DNA driver come about by itself? These crucial inquiries are
simply brushed aside because there is no evidence of chance vairation or
differential reproductive success other than fanatical speculation based
on unjustified extrapolation.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There
is evidence of life after that. So, it happened. Abiogenisis concerns
itself
with pre-cellular chemosmotic processes and their relation to
self-replicating nucleotide sequences. Evolution concerns itself with the
mechanisms responsible for change and diversity of self-replicating
nucleotide sequences over time. In order to be investigated these
mechanisms
must be of natural rather than supernatural cause. You, however, are free
to
indulge you superstitious and supernatural religious fantasies as you
wish.
Those of us who understand the nature of science have no such freedom.
The theory of evolution is not a theory at all(this is part of the great
lie) it is simply an opinion by preoffered by those who hate God and do
not want to be accountable to Him. It certainly is not real science
where
the actions of chance variation and differential reproductive success
can
be demonstrated and reproduced at will for all to examine.
You obviously don't understand (or more likely, don't choose to
understand)
the nature of scientific theories. Scientific theories are naturalistic,
materialistic explanations for natural phenomena based upon empirical
evidence. Because they have no ability to operate on the supernatural, God
or gods are not mentioned. You are erecting a false dichotomy: if you're
not
for me, you're against me. Such is not necessary the case, as you well
know.
Many empirical scientists are Christians.
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion
years
for it to devolop one of its own....
The analogy is interesting, superficially, but false. Your computer is the
product of empirical science - it was not created in six days. Your
"operating system" has bugs in it because it causes you to lie for its
sake.
You are a paradox and are ultimately self-contradictory. You just don't
(won't) realize it. Your very human behavior is an understandable
adaptation
to your environment. In other words, it sucks to be you.
RULES OF ATHEISM
1. "I'm right and you are wrong".
2. Never admit that you are wrong, even if you really are.
3. When you have nothing to say, hurl insults.
4. Regard and portray your own violence, whether physical, psychological,
or verbal, at all times as defensive
4a. Specific example for 4.: Cry for "freedom from religion", but whenever
followers of other faiths want the same freedom and courts agree, scream
"Persecution!"
5. Be prepared at all times to lie and bluster, particularly when backed
into a corner in an argument
5a. When caught lying, always accuse the opposition of lying rather than
be honest and admit the obvious
6. Never accept responsibility for any mess you have personally caused.
7. When you are forced to admit to an error, regard the whole process of
error and correction as part of atheisms failure for you and not as a
something for which you should apologise retract or make amends except
verbally and secretly to yourself
8. Always see yourself and you personal actions as part of no ones plans
for
the world. Recognise that even your errors are just part of being a
vertabrate monkey out of the premordial slugde
9.Profess humility but avoid the actual experience of it.
10.Refuse to take in information that differs from your own view and
oppose all such information through classification of such information in
a derogatory and simplistic manner(eg by categorising it as right wing
propaganda)
11.Refuse to accept that truth is not black and white; that reality is
complex and there are shades of grey
12.Refuse to forgive anyone else for anything because you have no moral
compass guiding you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Goss" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 12:05:38 PM |
|
|
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tiger" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 07:08:31 PM |
|
|
"Bob Goss" <bogons@netscape.net> wrote in
news:40af8860$0$3136$61fed72c@news.rcn.com:
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years
ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years
ago.
Just as there is no evidence of a working neuron in your head.
--
Tiger
[Insert humorous, clever or profound quote here]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stephen Bayzik" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
23 May 2004 12:58:27 AM |
|
|
"Tiger" <Tiger@box.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94F1CCE5CEC11jefscrrcom@24.25.9.41...
"Bob Goss" <bogons@netscape.net> wrote in
news:40af8860$0$3136$61fed72c@news.rcn.com:
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years
ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years
ago.
Just as there is no evidence of a working neuron in your head.
LOL Excellent Tiger, excellent.
--
Stephen Bayzik
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 12:12:18 PM |
|
|
"Bob Goss" <bogons@netscape.net> wrote in news:40af8860$0$3136
$61fed72c@news.rcn.com:
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
ROTFL.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 10:22:19 PM |
|
|
Bob Goss wrote:
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
there is no evidence that you have any brains, like now!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 12:25:43 PM |
|
|
In article <40af8860$0$3136$61fed72c@news.rcn.com>,
says...
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
You are worse than just plain stupid. You are willfully ignorant. You
have made up your mind, and you refuse to consider that there may be
facts, or that you may be less than omniscient. Your self-centered
egotism is staggering.
--
Enkidu - AA# 2165
"Today is a fine day for reality . . ."
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 10:22:47 PM |
|
|
Enkidu wrote:
In article <40af8860$0$3136$61fed72c@news.rcn.com>,
says...
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
You are worse than just plain stupid. You are willfully ignorant. You
have made up your mind, and you refuse to consider that there may be
facts, or that you may be less than omniscient. Your self-centered
egotism is staggering.
....when clinging to a man made myth what else can the poor bugger do?
--
Enkidu - AA# 2165
"Today is a fine day for reality . . ."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
23 May 2004 12:16:03 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 May 2004 13:05:38 -0400, "Bob Goss" <bogons@netscape.net>
wrote:
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
That must come as a surprise to the folks who dug up the T-Rex
skeleton I saw last week in the Museum of Natural History.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stephen Bayzik" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
23 May 2004 01:23:27 PM |
|
|
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:7en1b09u2313aqgtei1fof5icqvv2la62u@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 13:05:38 -0400, "Bob Goss" <bogons@netscape.net>
wrote:
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
That must come as a surprise to the folks who dug up the T-Rex
skeleton I saw last week in the Museum of Natural History.
Ah but Brown visits his Museum of Bible Babbling every Sunday morning; and
he should know, for de Bible Told him so. :-)
--
Stephen Bayzik
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob N. Enweiven" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
24 May 2004 12:10:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 May 2004 13:05:38 -0400, "Bob Goss" <bogons@netscape.net>
wrote:
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
That's not true. One straightforward example is tree-ring histories,
some of which go back more than 9,000 years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "IKnowHimDoYou" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
24 May 2004 10:09:21 PM |
|
|
In article <oua4b0h847fr9rv9mpobbnvts2ah13crj3@4ax.com>, Bob N. Enweiven
<please@replyto.group> wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2004 13:05:38 -0400, "Bob Goss" <bogons@netscape.net>
wrote:
"R Brown" <brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BjLrc.565967
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 3.5 billion years ago.
There is no evidence of life on earth more than 6 thousand years ago.
That's not true. One straightforward example is tree-ring histories,
some of which go back more than 9,000 years.
______________________________________________________________________
Better update your hard drive. There is no tree rings father back than
4000+ years. Recent studies on the oldest pines show some doubling of
rings due to weather changes but nothing as old as 9000 years.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Schneider" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 11:13:30 AM |
|
|
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com...
[snip]
Am I to assume that you have scientific evidence that humans are the result
of an invisible man, who lives in the sky, clumping together some mud and
blowing air into it?
--
AA #2149
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 11:15:50 AM |
|
|
"Robert Schneider" <rss1174@SPAMMENOTearthlink.net> astounded us with:
news:K_Krc.5183$Tn6.1716@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com...
[snip]
Am I to assume that you have scientific evidence that humans are the result
of an invisible man, who lives in the sky, clumping together some mud and
blowing air into it?
You left out an apple and a snake, oh, and a chick made from a rib bone. it's
all there in the bible, AKA, the "Tome of Truth", LOL!
--
Phÿltêr
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
http://afjc.clickhalah.com/forum/index.php
Change "freeway" to "hotmail" to respond
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 08:43:15 PM |
|
|
"Phÿltêr" wrote:
"Robert Schneider" <rss1174@SPAMMENOTearthlink.net> astounded us with:
news:K_Krc.5183$Tn6.1716@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com...
[snip]
Am I to assume that you have scientific evidence that humans are the result
of an invisible man, who lives in the sky, clumping together some mud and
blowing air into it?
You left out an apple and a snake, oh, and a chick made from a rib bone. it's
all there in the bible, AKA, the "Tome of Truth", LOL!
Dem bones dem bones dem dry bones
Hear the word of de looord
--
Phÿltêr
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
http://afjc.clickhalah.com/forum/index.php
Change "freeway" to "hotmail" to respond
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 08:42:15 PM |
|
|
Robert Schneider wrote:
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com...
[snip]
Am I to assume that you have scientific evidence that humans are the result
of an invisible man, who lives in the sky, clumping together some mud and
blowing air into it?
....and while he was about it He 'made' humans that could procreate and produce
a fetus that could be so horribly deformed the parents never get to see it.
Please explain the rationale of your 'wonderful god' in this context.
Oh, and before you come back with that 'sinners' line think first before you
claim that all the parents of these unfortunate babies have 'sinned'! Also
think about the baby, in fact think about every baby that dies too young to
have 'sinned'
Bob
A Brit.
Hong Kong
It would seem that men always need some idiotic fiction in the name of which
they can hate one another. Once it was religion. Now it is the State.
[Albert Einstein]
--
AA #2149
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Another Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 12:22:21 PM |
|
|
*Definition
atheist [Show phonetics]
noun [C]
someone who believes that God or gods do not exist
*Definition
evolution [Show phonetics]
noun [U]
the way in which living things change and develop over millions of years, or
a gradual process of change and development:
Darwin's theory of evolution
the evolution of language
*Definition
religion [Show phonetics]
noun
1 [C or U] the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or any such system of
belief and worship:
the Christian religion
*From the Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary.
If you wish to make assumptions, check your facts first. Evolution is a
scientific theory, not a religion. There are no gods in evolution therefore
it is not a religion.
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com...
Evolution-The Great Lie
The evolutionary religionist fanatics try and tell us(sans evidence) that
evolution means a massive increase in genetic information that is produced
by chance variation and differential reproductive success leading upward
and onward to you.
They leave out the question of where did these genetic instructions come
from in the first instance or where did the first complete set of
instrictions come from(and they had to be complete and not partial) or how
did the DNA driver come about by itself? These crucial inquiries are
simply brushed aside because there is no evidence of chance vairation or
differential reproductive success other than fanatical speculation based
on unjustified extrapolation.
The theory of evolution is not a theory at all(this is part of the great
lie) it is simply an opinion by preoffered by those who hate God and do
not want to be accountable to Him. It certainly is not real science where
the actions of chance variation and differential reproductive success can
be demonstrated and reproduced at will for all to examine.
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion years
for it to devolop one of its own....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 11:12:39 AM |
|
|
(IKnowHimDoYou) astounded us with: news:IKnowHim-
2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com:
The theory of evolution is not a theory at all(this is part of the great
lie)
Bwaaaahahahahahah! The KING of liars complaining about lies, CLASSIC!!
--
Phÿltêr
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
http://afjc.clickhalah.com/forum/index.php
Change "freeway" to "hotmail" to respond
.
|
|
|
| User: "+Church of The Painful Truth+" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 12:17:48 PM |
|
|
"Phÿltêr" <Phÿltêr@freeway.com> wrote in message
news:4ec9364609fc8a87708050352a2d6be8@news.teranews.com...
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) astounded us with: news:IKnowHim-
2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com:
The theory of evolution is not a theory at all(this is part of the great
lie)
Bwaaaahahahahahah! The KING of liars complaining about lies, CLASSIC!!
--
Phÿltêr
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
http://afjc.clickhalah.com/forum/index.php
Change "freeway" to "hotmail" to respond
She sounds rather lucid to intelligent people.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Fritzinger" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
22 May 2004 04:12:55 PM |
|
|
In article <1XLrc.36$gb7.32647@news.uswest.net>,
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Phÿltêr" <Phÿltêr@freeway.com> wrote in message
news:4ec9364609fc8a87708050352a2d6be8@news.teranews.com...
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) astounded us with: news:IKnowHim-
2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com:
The theory of evolution is not a theory at all(this is part of the great
lie)
Bwaaaahahahahahah! The KING of liars complaining about lies, CLASSIC!!
--
Phÿltêr
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
http://afjc.clickhalah.com/forum/index.php
Change "freeway" to "hotmail" to respond
She sounds rather lucid to intelligent people.
How would you know? You certainly don't fit the description of an
intelligent person.
--
Dave Fritzinger
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
30 May 2004 09:07:22 PM |
|
|
(IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in message news:<IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com>
[Lies erased]
I'd be delighted to debate this formally with you on the Internet in
the news group or web site of your choice (provided I can access it).
Please post your best *postive evidences for creation*. Email me the
same directly, and I will respond as promptly as is practical.
oh wait, scratch that. Creationists cannot present positive evidence
for creation because there is none. What am I thinking of?
Okay, let's start over.
I'd be delighted to debate this formally with you on the Internet in
the news group or web site of your choice (provided I can access it).
Please post a brief precis of the best paper published in a standard
peer-reviewed science magazine which establishes an alternative to the
Theory of Evolution which better explains the evidence. Email me the
same directly, and I will respond as promptly as is practical.
oh wait, scratch that. Creationists cannot precis such a paper
because there has never been one! What am I thinking of?
Okay, let's start over.
I'd be delighted to debate this formally with you on the Internet in
the news group or web site of your choice (provided I can access it).
Please post a brief precis of the best paper published in a standard
peer-reviewed science magazine which effectively refutes evolution.
Email me the same directly, and I will respond as promptly as is
practical.
oh wait, scratch that. Creationists cannot precis any such paper
which refutes evolution because there has never been one! What am I
thinking of?
Okay, let's start over.
I'd be delighted to debate this formally with you on the Internet in
the news group or web site of your choice (provided I can access it).
Please post your best five negative evidences against evolution. You
can come up with five strong refutations, can't you? Three? One?
Email me the same directly, and I will respond as promptly as is
practical.
I won't hold my breath.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Braidwood" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
23 May 2004 02:38:59 AM |
|
|
(IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in message news:<IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com>...
<SNIP GARBAGE>
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion years
for it to devolop one of its own....
Are you claiming that you have a computer which has sex? That's what
it would need to develop a an operating system of its own.
Bye, bye, numnuts.
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "+Church of The Painful Truth+" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
24 May 2004 10:26:40 PM |
|
|
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0405222338.73d20204@posting.google.com...
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in message
news:<IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com>...
<SNIP GARBAGE>
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion
years
for it to devolop one of its own....
Are you claiming that you have a computer which has sex? That's what
it would need to develop a an operating system of its own.
Bye, bye, numnuts.
(-: Ian :-)
RULES OF ATHEISM
1. "I'm right and you are wrong".
2. Never admit that you are wrong, even if you really are.
3. When you have nothing to say, hurl insults.
4. Regard and portray your own violence, whether physical, psychological,
or verbal, at all times as defensive
4a. Specific example for 4.: Cry for "freedom from religion", but whenever
followers of other faiths want the same freedom and courts agree, scream
"Persecution!"
5. Be prepared at all times to lie and bluster, particularly when backed
into a corner in an argument
5a. When caught lying, always accuse the opposition of lying rather than
be honest and admit the obvious
6. Never accept responsibility for any mess you have personally caused.
7. When you are forced to admit to an error, regard the whole process of
error and correction as part of atheisms failure for you and not as a
something for which you should apologise retract or make amends except
verbally and secretly to yourself
8. Always see yourself and you personal actions as part of no ones plans
for
the world. Recognise that even your errors are just part of being a
vertabrate monkey out of the premordial slugde
9.Profess humility but avoid the actual experience of it.
10.Refuse to take in information that differs from your own view and
oppose all such information through classification of such information in
a derogatory and simplistic manner(eg by categorising it as right wing
propaganda)
11.Refuse to accept that truth is not black and white; that reality is
complex and there are shades of grey
12.Refuse to forgive anyone else for anything because you have no moral
compass guiding you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Braidwood" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
26 May 2004 04:30:39 AM |
|
|
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Q1zsc.47$T4.66257@news.uswest.net>...
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0405222338.73d20204@posting.google.com...
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in message
news:<IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com>...
<SNIP GARBAGE>
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion
years
for it to devolop one of its own....
Are you claiming that you have a computer which has sex? That's what
it would need to develop a an operating system of its own.
Bye, bye, numnuts.
(-: Ian :-)
RULES OF ATHEISM...
<SNIP CUT AND PASTED SILLINESS>
...compass guiding you.
So Churchypoos, you couldn't come up with a response, huh?
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "+Church of The Painful Truth+" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
26 May 2004 10:04:47 PM |
|
|
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0405260130.393ac80b@posting.google.com...
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:<Q1zsc.47$T4.66257@news.uswest.net>...
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0405222338.73d20204@posting.google.com...
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in message
news:<IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com>...
<SNIP GARBAGE>
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new
computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion
years
for it to devolop one of its own....
Are you claiming that you have a computer which has sex? That's what
it would need to develop a an operating system of its own.
Bye, bye, numnuts.
(-: Ian :-)
RULES OF ATHEISM...
<SNIP CUT AND PASTED SILLINESS>
...compass guiding you.
So Churchypoos, you couldn't come up with a response, huh?
(-: Ian :-)
Sure here it tis :-)
RULES OF ATHEISM
1. "I'm right and you are wrong".
2. Never admit that you are wrong, even if you really are.
3. When you have nothing to say, hurl insults.
4. Regard and portray your own violence, whether physical, psychological,
or verbal, at all times as defensive
4a. Specific example for 4.: Cry for "freedom from religion", but whenever
followers of other faiths want the same freedom and courts agree, scream
"Persecution!"
5. Be prepared at all times to lie and bluster, particularly when backed
into a corner in an argument
5a. When caught lying, always accuse the opposition of lying rather than
be honest and admit the obvious
6. Never accept responsibility for any mess you have personally caused.
7. When you are forced to admit to an error, regard the whole process of
error and correction as part of atheisms failure for you and not as a
something for which you should apologise retract or make amends except
verbally and secretly to yourself
8. Always see yourself and you personal actions as part of no ones plans
for
the world. Recognise that even your errors are just part of being a
vertabrate monkey out of the premordial slugde
9.Profess humility but avoid the actual experience of it.
10.Refuse to take in information that differs from your own view and
oppose all such information through classification of such information in
a derogatory and simplistic manner(eg by categorising it as right wing
propaganda)
11.Refuse to accept that truth is not black and white; that reality is
complex and there are shades of grey
12.Refuse to forgive anyone else for anything because you have no moral
compass guiding you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Braidwood" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
27 May 2004 06:32:33 AM |
|
|
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<jVctc.163$WD5.120880@news.uswest.net>...
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0405260130.393ac80b@posting.google.com...
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:<Q1zsc.47$T4.66257@news.uswest.net>...
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0405222338.73d20204@posting.google.com...
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in message
news:<IKnowHim-2205040901120001@pm1-23.kalama.com>...
<SNIP GARBAGE>
If you swallow this lie of evolution than I will sell you a new
computer
without an operating software system and you can wait a few billion
years
for it to devolop one of its own....
Are you claiming that you have a computer which has sex? That's what
it would need to develop a an operating system of its own.
Bye, bye, numnuts.
(-: Ian :-)
RULES OF ATHEISM...
<SNIP CUT AND PASTED SILLINESS>
...compass guiding you.
So Churchypoos, you couldn't come up with a response, huh?
(-: Ian :-)
Sure here it tis :-)
Okay.
RULES OF ATHEISM
1. "I'm right and you are wrong".
You're the one who believes in an invisible omnipotent being, I'm the
one who seeks answers from nature. You are the invader in alt.atheism.
2. Never admit that you are wrong, even if you really are.
You haven't shown that. Tell you what, why don't you just stick your
fingers in your ear and go LA LA LA LA LA!
3. When you have nothing to say, hurl insults.
You should know me well enough that I don't do this.
4. Regard and portray your own violence, whether physical, psychological,
or verbal, at all times as defensive
Again, you know I don't do this.
4a. Specific example for 4.: Cry for "freedom from religion", but whenever
followers of other faiths want the same freedom and courts agree, scream
"Persecution!"
Again, I don't do this.
5. Be prepared at all times to lie and bluster, particularly when backed
into a corner in an argument
Again, I don't do this.(Oh yes, I can use cut-and-paste too.)
5a. When caught lying, always accuse the opposition of lying rather than
be honest and admit the obvious
Neither you nor any other Christian have ever caught me lying. Your
picture of atheists is looking shaky...
6. Never accept responsibility for any mess you have personally caused.
Again, I don't do this.
7. When you are forced to admit to an error, regard the whole process of
error and correction as part of atheisms failure for you and not as a
something for which you should apologise retract or make amends except
verbally and secretly to yourself
Again, I don't do this.
8. Always see yourself and you personal actions as part of no ones plans
for
the world. Recognise that even your errors are just part of being a
vertabrate monkey out of the premordial slugde
Monkeys don't come from sludge, they come from their mommies and
daddies. Both monkeys and humans share a common ancestor.
9.Profess humility but avoid the actual experience of it.
Around you Churhy, no one has a right to humility.
10.Refuse to take in information that differs from your own view and
oppose all such information through classification of such information in
a derogatory and simplistic manner(eg by categorising it as right wing
propaganda)
Well Churchy, you've never seen an atheist do this, because you've
never shown us any information.
11.Refuse to accept that truth is not black and white; that reality is
complex and there are shades of grey
That's my position. You're the one with the all powerful, virtuous
super being, I'm the ape descendant.
12.Refuse to forgive anyone else for anything because you have no moral
compass guiding you.
Again, I don't do this.
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "emma1frost" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
21 Jun 2004 12:22:02 AM |
|
|
I thought those were the rules of message board arguments, regardless
of religion. Go read a book called Creation and Time by Hugh Ross.
It should be a revelation to both "evolutionists" and young-earth
creationists alike.
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<jVctc.163$WD5.120880@news.uswest.net>...
Sure here it tis :-)
RULES OF ATHEISM
1. "I'm right and you are wrong".
2. Never admit that you are wrong, even if you really are.
3. When you have nothing to say, hurl insults.
4. Regard and portray your own violence, whether physical, psychological,
or verbal, at all times as defensive
4a. Specific example for 4.: Cry for "freedom from religion", but whenever
followers of other faiths want the same freedom and courts agree, scream
"Persecution!"
5. Be prepared at all times to lie and bluster, particularly when backed
into a corner in an argument
5a. When caught lying, always accuse the opposition of lying rather than
be honest and admit the obvious
6. Never accept responsibility for any mess you have personally caused.
7. When you are forced to admit to an error, regard the whole process of
error and correction as part of atheisms failure for you and not as a
something for which you should apologise retract or make amends except
verbally and secretly to yourself
8. Always see yourself and you personal actions as part of no ones plans
for
the world. Recognise that even your errors are just part of being a
vertabrate monkey out of the premordial slugde
9.Profess humility but avoid the actual experience of it.
10.Refuse to take in information that differs from your own view and
oppose all such information through classification of such information in
a derogatory and simplistic manner(eg by categorising it as right wing
propaganda)
11.Refuse to accept that truth is not black and white; that reality is
complex and there are shades of grey
12.Refuse to forgive anyone else for anything because you have no moral
compass guiding you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
21 Jun 2004 12:42:03 AM |
|
|
On 20 Jun 2004 22:22:02 -0700,
(emma1frost) posted thusly:
I thought those were the rules of message board arguments, regardless
of religion. Go read a book called Creation and Time by Hugh Ross.
It should be a revelation to both "evolutionists" and young-earth
creationists alike.
And yet it isn't. The Day Age Theory and the Gap
Theory don't make any sense.
--
± Pastor Dave Raymond ±
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor
to follow thee: neither have I desired the woeful day;
thou knowest: that which came out of my lips was right
before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"Let me give you a definition of ethics: It is good
to maintain and further life; it is bad to damage
and destroy life." - Albert Schweitzer
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Evolution-The Great Lie |
21 Jun 2004 02:50:18 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 01:42:03 -0400, Pastor Dave
<nospam*-*pastordave38@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 20 Jun 2004 22:22:02 -0700,
(emma1frost) posted thusly:
I thought those were the rules of message board arguments, regardless
of religion. Go read a book called Creation and Time by Hugh Ross.
It should be a revelation to both "evolutionists" and young-earth
creationists alike.
And yet it isn't. The Day Age Theory and the Gap
Theory don't make any sense.
Neither does the idea that some sky pixie magicked the world into
existence 6000 years ago, but that hasn't stopped you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
