The posts JW JABRIOL nuked .. and how to get Jabriol NUKED!
Q1. Who is Jabriol, and where can I find his posts?
A1. Antonio Santana, of Camden, NJ, one of Jehovah's Witnesses and a
regular contributor to Usenet via a large number of different ISPs,
mail2news servers and email accounts (which he sometimes uses in

ways so as to make himself difficult to track down). To find out about

he posts, you should click on:
http://google.com/groups?as_uauthors=jabriol&num=100
You might quickly conclude that Jabriol:
* supports the act of rape, and believes the victim is often to blame -

that the rape victim should be explicitly told this;
* actively encourages depressed people to commit suicide - and this has

the predictable effect - at least once;
* supports violence by husbands against wives, who must show total
subjection;
* derives great satisfaction from images of billions of children and

being slaughtered by the leader of his JW Cult;
* has beaten and driven away his own daughter, etc.
Jabriol has been doing this for many, many years. Indeed, there are so

posts by him that you will fall afoul of Google's limitation of search
results to 1000 matches at most. To get around this, surf to:
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
and then, in sequence:
(a) in the box marked "Author Return only messages where the author is "
enter Jabriol ; and
(b) Click on "Return messages posted between " ; and
(c) Enter a restricted date range of (say) 6 months (his first post was in
June 1996, and the volume of posts per month from him has grown and

and
(d) Set the dropdown list which defaults to "10 messages" to "100
messages"; and
(e) Press the button marked "Google Search"; and
(f) Systematically work your way through the lists of messages you get -
this may be many pages full of headers, at a hundred per page. Then loop
back to the Search page and use a further date range.
Q2. I have read what he has put out there, and I am horrified and

If all this is known, how come Jabriol has not been disfellowshipped (the
kooky Watchtower word for "excommunicated") from the Jehovah's Witnesses?
A2. Firstly, JWs stick together. "The Brothers" routinely shield
wife-beaters, pedophiles and so on. Their official policy is to shield
accused pedophiles from the law (they won't report them to the cops unless
absolutely legally compelled to do so, and will threaten family members
with excommunication i.e. certain death if they whistleblow, the charge
being "bringing the name of Jehovah into disrepute") UNLESS the pedo
confesses OR there are two witnesses to the same occurrence (hey, how many
pedos invite non-pedo onlookers??). So it is not surprising that the
filthy, disgusting JW *SWINE* here in Usenet stick by Jabriol. For more
evidence of how the Jehovah's Witnesses stick together, irrespective of
right or wrong, please read A8 below.
Also, Jabriol knows something those immediately above him do not wish him
to divulge.
Q3. So, what did Jabriol nuke from the Google posting archives??
A3. You will have observed Jabriol posts quoting a huge number of

email accounts. Many of these are fake ones (either non-existent, or
belonging to someone else). One drawback of this is that is hard (or
impossible) to nuke material that has originated from an email account one
does not control, as confirmation of identity must come from that email
account.
So, from time to time he uses real accounts. Two recent ones have been:

he knew he could remove later on.
And, after his despicable actions re Chris Dubose (the suicide), these
posts HAVE been nuked from the archives. For proof, check out these URLs:
http://google.com/groups?as_uauthors=

Q4. Could the nuked posts have been forgeries?
A4. No. Using my contacts at echelon.net, I archived all of them. Here

a few of the message-IDs:
1KNd7.167576$Cu6.13518...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
BxBd7.164642$Cu6.13078...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
cP%d7.171092$Cu6.14043...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
DmEc7.205216$Gk.12836...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
FmEc7.205218$Gk.12837...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
fxBd7.164621$Cu6.13078...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
hNhe7.7053$NK1.355...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
LCAc7.200458$Gk.12684...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
LzRa7.122018$Gk.7795...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
MCAc7.200461$Gk.12683...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
MCAc7.200461$Gk.12683...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
pwNd7.167404$Cu6.13515...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
QmEc7.205229$Gk.12836...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
RCAc7.200468$Gk.12684...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
roGe7.5418$Lw3.617...@news2.aus1.giganews.com
sb8d7.151897$Cu6.12039...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
TCAc7.200470$Gk.12684...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
WCAc7.200474$Gk.12684...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
YL%d7.171073$Cu6.14041...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com
[snip]
A careful check of the headers show some of the messages originated from
Astra Labs Limited, whose services are often employed by Jabriol. Contrary
to what the MIDs suggestion, they did not originate in Australia.
Secondly, the language and message in them is vintage Jabriol (just a bit
more extreme).
Thirdly, while many of those posts occurred in threads in which Jabriol

also participating with other email addresses (and which posts are not
nuked), not once did he cry "forgery", even in responses to persons who
were themselves responding to