fabled primordial soup never existed



 Religions > Atheism > fabled primordial soup never existed

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "david ford"
Date: 18 Feb 2005 01:12:03 PM
Object: fabled primordial soup never existed
John Wilkins wrote in "Re: Evidence for a frozen sea on Mars":

Harlequin <usenet@sdc.cox.net> wrote:

Look at this file before it is deleted:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2005/pdf/1741.pdf

Basically the European Space Agency's Mars Express orbiter
has found evidence of a frozen sea of water near the Martian
equator. The size is 800 km x 900 km with an average 45 m depth.
They say this is similiar to the size and depth of the North Sea.

The reason they believe it has not sublimed away is that it got
covered with volcanic ash shortly after forming.


Oh gosh, I hope so. It would make a Mars expedition almost a certainty.
Now, if they can just find an available carbonaceous chondritic impact,

I'm reminded of the Chyba & Sagan article cited below.
Yockey, Hubert P. January 1995. Correspondence
"Information in bits and bytes: Reply to Lifson's Review of
[Yockey's] 'Information Theory and Molecular Biology'" _BioEssays_
17(1): 85-88. On 87, two paragraphs:
According to the standard model of the origin of life, there are
two paths the carbon would follow in the primeval soup. The first
is toward forming the ancient protobiont, the remains of which
would go to kerogen. The second, and the much more abundant
amount, is the tarry material generated in all origin-of-life
simulation experiments. No kerogen from the tarry material left
over from the generation of the 'building blocks' of life is found.
This is extremely good confirmation that there never were the large
quantities of dissolved amino acids, or other 'building blocks',
that could be called a primeval soup. The significance of the very
old kerogen in the Isua rocks in Greenland is that there never was
a primeval soup and that living matter must have existed abundantly
on earth before 3.8 billion years ago.
Even the true believers Stanley Miller^19 and Carl Sagan^20 have
estimated an extremely dilute primeval soup. Miller's latest
(1992) estimate of the concentration of the primeval soup is 0.0003
M. Chyba and Sagan^20 estimated the concentration of organic
compounds in the primeval ocean as 0.1% if the atmosphere had been
reducing (it was not), or 0.0001% if it had been neutral (it was).
That is as far as a true believer has gone towards admitting that
no primeval soup ever existed. So much for prebiotic synthesis of
organic compounds and chemical evolution! _The absence of evidence
is evidence of absence!_
19: S. L. Miller, "The prebiotic synthesis of organic compounds as a
step toward the origin of life" in _Major Events in the History of
Life_, ed. J. Schopf (1992).
20: C. Chyba and C. Sagan, "Endogenous production, exogenous delivery
and impact-shock synthesis of organic molecules: an inventory for
the origins of life" _Nature_ 355: 125-32 (1992).

and a nitrogen source...

Did you intend "methane and ammonia"?
You still believe in spontaneous generation, I take it. In all
probability, the fabled organic soup never existed. The early earth's
atmosphere was _not_ highly-reducing, as is required if one is to get
anywhere close to a reasonable number and variety of amino acids.
Instead, the atmosphere was for the most part nitrogen, carbon monoxide,
and carbon dioxide, with volcanoes spewing out CO_2 and N.[1] With such
an atmosphere, experimenters report getting only glycine. With some
reactions, one can obtain an additional 4 amino acids, but then that's
it.[2]
About the amount of time available for spontaneous generation: Manfred
Schidlowski of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry reports from
studying carbon 12 and carbon 13 isotopes that he's found, in the words
of his article's title, "A 3,800-million-year isotopic record of life
from carbon in sedimentary rocks" (_Nature_ 333: 313-318 (1988)).
That's on the lower end.
At the upper end, it's reported in _Nature_ 342: 139-42 (1989) that
early earth suffered much bombardment by asteroids, bombardments that
may have sterilized the earth, with the latest sterilizing bombardment
most likely occurring 3.8 billion years ago. (For something not
requiring light, i.e., living near an ocean vent, it could have survived
as early as 4.44 bya.)
So, in the words of Christopher Chyba and Carl Sagan, "The terrestrial
origins of life must therefore have coincided with the final stages of
the heavy bombardment of the inner Solar System..."(_Nature_ 355:
125-132 (1992), 125.)
You have extremely little time, if any, for your non-existent
nucleotides and amino acids to happen to come together to form life.
Notes
1. Naeye, Robert. July 1996. "Okay, Where Are They?" _Astronomy_,
38-43, 41. For volcanoes, see
Horgan, John. February 1991. "In the Beginning..."
_Scientific American_, 117-125, 121. See also
Shapiro, Robert. 1986. _Origins: A Skeptic's Guide to the
Creation of Life on Earth_ (Great Britain: Penguin Books), 332pp., 111-112.
Rana, Fazale and Hugh Ross (creationists). 2004. _Origins of Life:
Biblical and Evolutionary Models Face Off_ (USA: NavPress), 298pp., 99-100.
2. Schlesinger, Gordon and Stanley L. Miller. 1983. "Prebiotic
Synthesis in Atmospheres Containing CH_4, CO, and CO_2: I. Amino Acids"
_Journal of Molecular Evolution_ 19: 376-382, 381.
For Further Reading
1985 A.G. Cairns-Smith, 1986 Andrew Scott, 1999 Freeman Dyson
http://groups.google.co.in/groups?selm=dford3-33bltcF3rgbovU1%40individual.net
some 1915-1999 doses of reality
http://groups.google.co.in/groups?selm=dford3-33arf3F3vjdggU1%40individual.net
.

User: "Bob"

Title: Re: fabled primordial soup never existed 18 Feb 2005 03:57:04 PM
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:12:03 -0500, david ford <dford3@gl.umbc.edu>
wrote:


You still believe in spontaneous generation, I take it.

since life did not always exist on earth, either it came from
somewhere else, or was spontaneously generated here.


You have extremely little time, if any, for your non-existent
nucleotides and amino acids to happen to come together to form life.

amino acids have been found in meteorites. so they ALREADY existed
before life.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field
.
User: "Walter Bushell"

Title: Re: fabled primordial soup never existed 20 Feb 2005 01:45:09 PM
In article <4216644e.11038930@usenet.ptd.net>,
(Bob)
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:12:03 -0500, david ford <dford3@gl.umbc.edu>
wrote:


You still believe in spontaneous generation, I take it.


since life did not always exist on earth, either it came from
somewhere else, or was spontaneously generated here.


You have extremely little time, if any, for your non-existent
nucleotides and amino acids to happen to come together to form life.


amino acids have been found in meteorites. so they ALREADY existed
before life.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

We know the first Mars expedition was wiped out after a jealous rage,
when one of the explorers killed another for killing his wife by getting
here pregnant millions of miles from medical help. A later mission using
the Lyle drive (IIRC named after his mother) "rescues" the sole
survivor. Much hilarity ensues.
Anyone else want to step up to the Mike?
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.
User: "Euan Troup"

Title: Re: fabled primordial soup never existed 21 Feb 2005 01:43:00 AM
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:45:09 -0500, Walter Bushell ascii'd:


You have extremely little time, if any, for your non-existent
nucleotides and amino acids to happen to come together to form life.


amino acids have been found in meteorites. so they ALREADY existed
before life.

We know the first Mars expedition was wiped out after a jealous rage,
when one of the explorers killed another for killing his wife by getting
here pregnant millions of miles from medical help. A later mission using
the Lyle drive (IIRC named after his mother) "rescues" the sole
survivor. Much hilarity ensues.


Anyone else want to step up to the Mike?

You're a few days late to be looking for a Valentine.
--
...mostly harmless.
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Evidence for a frozen sea on Mars 19 Feb 2005 01:43:09 AM
The dishonest quote-miner David Ford tries to highjack
the thread.
For an example of his dishonest quote mining see:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.atheism/msg/80b9d71ca7be1da0
Vrs
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_tautology.html

david ford wrote:
.

User: "Michael Altarriba"

Title: Re: fabled primordial soup never existed 18 Feb 2005 02:17:20 PM
david ford wrote:

John Wilkins wrote in "Re: Evidence for a frozen sea on Mars":

Harlequin <usenet@sdc.cox.net> wrote:

<implied "Appeal to Authority" and "Argument From Personal Incredulity"
snipped>
You have to love words like "never", when applied to the real world...
they imply a level of arrogance bordering on delusions of omniscience.
They say that "I can't imagine an alternative, therefore no alternative
exists"... a lack of imagination magically converts into knowledge.
.

User: "Prof Weird"

Title: Re: fabled primordial soup never existed 18 Feb 2005 02:07:21 PM
david ford wrote:

John Wilkins wrote in "Re: Evidence for a frozen sea on Mars":

Harlequin <usenet@sdc.cox.net> wrote:

Look at this file before it is deleted:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2005/pdf/1741.pdf

Basically the European Space Agency's Mars Express orbiter
has found evidence of a frozen sea of water near the Martian
equator. The size is 800 km x 900 km with an average 45 m depth.
They say this is similiar to the size and depth of the North Sea.

The reason they believe it has not sublimed away is that it got
covered with volcanic ash shortly after forming.


Oh gosh, I hope so. It would make a Mars expedition almost a

certainty.

Now, if they can just find an available carbonaceous chondritic

impact,


I'm reminded of the Chyba & Sagan article cited below.

Yockey, Hubert P. January 1995. Correspondence
"Information in bits and bytes: Reply to Lifson's Review of
[Yockey's] 'Information Theory and Molecular Biology'" _BioEssays_
17(1): 85-88. On 87, two paragraphs:
According to the standard model of the origin of life, there are
two paths the carbon would follow in the primeval soup. The

first

is toward forming the ancient protobiont, the remains of which
would go to kerogen. The second, and the much more abundant
amount, is the tarry material generated in all origin-of-life
simulation experiments. No kerogen from the tarry material left
over from the generation of the 'building blocks' of life is

found.

This is extremely good confirmation that there never were the

large

quantities of dissolved amino acids, or other 'building blocks',
that could be called a primeval soup. The significance of the

very

old kerogen in the Isua rocks in Greenland is that there never

was

a primeval soup and that living matter must have existed

abundantly

on earth before 3.8 billion years ago.

Even the true believers Stanley Miller^19 and Carl Sagan^20 have
estimated an extremely dilute primeval soup. Miller's latest
(1992) estimate of the concentration of the primeval soup is

0.0003

M. Chyba and Sagan^20 estimated the concentration of organic
compounds in the primeval ocean as 0.1% if the atmosphere had

been

reducing (it was not), or 0.0001% if it had been neutral (it

was).

That is as far as a true believer has gone towards admitting that
no primeval soup ever existed. So much for prebiotic synthesis

of

organic compounds and chemical evolution! _The absence of

evidence

is evidence of absence!_

Therefore, ABSENCE of evidence for supernatural
intervention/'intelligent' designers is evidence of the absence of
supernatural intervention/'intelligent' designers !
Unfortunately for you, prebiotic synthesis is quite possible - you
don't even need a planet to do it :
"Self-assembling amphiphilic molecules : synthesis in simulated
interstellar/precometary ices", Dworkin J, Deamer D, Sanford S,
Allamondola L, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98(3):
815-819, Jan 2001
You ARE aware that amino acids and sugars have been discovered in
meteorites, right ?
There are known, naturalistic ways to concentrate organic molecules -
clays do it quite well. As do the interstices of iron sulfide
precipitates.


You still believe in spontaneous generation, I take it.

Ah - the standard mistake of 'confusing' abiogenesis with spontaneous
generation.
But, since all creationists have to support their feeble and flaccid
'hypotheses' is ignorance, personal incredulity, and misrepresentation,
that is not overly surprising.
In all

probability, the fabled organic soup never existed. The early

earth's

atmosphere was _not_ highly-reducing, as is required if one is to get
anywhere close to a reasonable number and variety of amino acids.

Do we actually need the ENTIRE atmosphere to be highly reducing, or
just some regions ?

Instead, the atmosphere was for the most part nitrogen, carbon

monoxide,

and carbon dioxide, with volcanoes spewing out CO_2 and N.[1] With

such

an atmosphere, experimenters report getting only glycine. With some
reactions, one can obtain an additional 4 amino acids, but then

that's

it.[2]

You COULD try citing works less than 20 YEARS out of date ?
Nah - they might show you are wrong, and so you MUST avoid them.
The most common ices in space are methanol, ammonia, carbon monoxide,
and carbon dioxide.
Know what happens when you expose those ices to UV light in a vacuum ?
You get COMPLEX ORGANIC MOLECULES. That form micelles in water.


About the amount of time available for spontaneous generation:

Manfred

Schidlowski of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry reports from
studying carbon 12 and carbon 13 isotopes that he's found, in the

words

of his article's title, "A 3,800-million-year isotopic record of life
from carbon in sedimentary rocks" (_Nature_ 333: 313-318 (1988)).
That's on the lower end.

At the upper end, it's reported in _Nature_ 342: 139-42 (1989) that
early earth suffered much bombardment by asteroids, bombardments that
may have sterilized the earth, with the latest sterilizing

bombardment

most likely occurring 3.8 billion years ago. (For something not
requiring light, i.e., living near an ocean vent, it could have

survived

as early as 4.44 bya.)

"On the origins of cells : a hypothesis for the evolutionary
transitions from abiotic geochemistry to chemoautotrophic prokaryotes,
and from prokaryotes to nucleated cells", Martin W, Russell MJ, Phil
Trans. R. Soc. London B (2003) 358: 59-85. Seems the 3D lattices of
iron sulfide can catalyze and concentrate organic molecules. They are
deep sea vent - so immune to need for light, and could indeed start
early.


So, in the words of Christopher Chyba and Carl Sagan, "The

terrestrial

origins of life must therefore have coincided with the final stages

of

the heavy bombardment of the inner Solar System..."(_Nature_ 355:
125-132 (1992), 125.)

You have extremely little time, if any, for your non-existent
nucleotides and amino acids to happen to come together to form life.

A few tens of MILLIONS years is 'extremely little time' ?!?!?!?!
It has been OBSERVED that nucleotides and amino acids can be formed by
abiotic means; hence, your whine of 'non-existent' is thus rendered
pathetic.
And your 'explanation' of the origin of life is what ?
Oh yes - "An unknowable being somehow did something sometime in the
past for some reason !!!"
.
User: "rj"

Title: Re: fabled primordial soup never existed 19 Feb 2005 11:02:58 AM
"Prof Weird" <poland@msx.dept-med.pitt.edu> wrote in
news:1108757241.840406.275570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:


And your 'explanation' of the origin of life is what ?

Oh yes - "An unknowable being somehow did something sometime in the
past for some reason !!!"

Actually I was told God created man because he wanted someone to worship him.
I am paraphrasing it but that is the general idea. I would consider that act
to be the ultimate in meglamania.
rj
.

User: "Walter Bushell"

Title: Re: fabled primordial soup never existed 20 Feb 2005 03:15:40 PM
In article <1108757241.840406.275570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"Prof Weird" <poland@msx.dept-med.pitt.edu> wrote:
<snip>

h - the standard mistake of 'confusing' abiogenesis with spontaneous
generation.

<snip>
I admit I was confused in Junior High School, perhaps the teachers just
glided over the situation, until I asked. If one has no idea of how
freaky and baroquely elaborated we metazoa are, it is a little confusing.
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.


User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: fabled primordial soup never existed 18 Feb 2005 04:41:14 PM
david ford wrote:

Basically the European Space Agency's Mars Express orbiter
has found evidence of a frozen sea of water near the Martian
equator. The size is 800 km x 900 km with an average 45 m depth.
They say this is similiar to the size and depth of the North Sea.

The reason they believe it has not sublimed away is that it got
covered with volcanic ash shortly after forming.


Oh gosh, I hope so. It would make a Mars expedition almost a
certainty. Now, if they can just find an available carbonaceous
chondritic impact,

Science News Item, dated 5/17/2343.
Lost datachips from the First mars expedition in late 2009 revealed what may
have been the reason for the murders and suicide of all people on the ship.
After listening to the voice data announcing a successful landing and the
jubilant report that there was indeed a frozen sea what sounded like a flaw
turned out to be the sound of an enraged person, believed to be the
perpetrator of the slaughter.
It was finally determined that the voice was screaming "What do you mean you
forgot the ice skates?"
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER