| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Amandla" |
| Date: |
12 Aug 2005 07:22:45 PM |
| Object: |
Fabulous Angelification |
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
There are MANY scientists who will not understand me. There are also
some who should KNOW BETER! The 'intelligent design' argument has
WON!!!
Although it has won, it is WRONG to call it that. GOD does not reveal
Hymself. HE is at one remove from the design. The philosophical
agumaent (and lots of philosphy groups and evolution GROUPS agree!!!)
is that if GOD is needed for Fabulous Angelification (they call it
Intelligant Design because they do not KNOW that it was ANGELS!!)..
GOD made the ANGELS to fabulate his PROMISE to make CREATION.
We have mathamatacal PROOF that HE did this with ANGELS. See the proof
in these statements - they KNOW not WHAT they DO, even though they are
right!!!!
http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/
http://www.ncseweb.org
http://www.crisismagazine.com/april2003/feature1.htm&ei=bjD9QvHEF4eKsQGn8427Dg
http://www.origins.org/menus/design.html&ei=bjD9QvHEF4eKsQGn8427Dg
These articles PROVE that we are STARDUST made by ANGELS!
The ignorant think that we need to prove that GOD made GOD. That is the
mistake of Inteligant Design. We were made by ANGELS by a FABULOUS
incarnetion. The phioosofers get it wrong. We do not need to PROOVE
that GOD is there - even the ATHEISTS ans liars adn WHORES of BABYLON
kno that GOD is there. They just missed the philosiphical point that it
was ANGELS not GOD, so there is no argement!!!
I tell you. I tel you with deep wisdem. GOD will not be mocaed. HE made
the ANGELS and they made life. We kno that because ANGELS are not that
inteligint so they got it wron - like the appendixz
Only if they was tru to themself wood the INTELLEGINT DESIGN people kno
that we are made by desegn! STARDUST profs it. Fabel it C-now-en tru.
There is no argiment.
Now is time for EVIL to repent AN confes. EVILUTON is the DEVIL. He
make us SIN. We must apoligize and say FABULOUS EVOLUTION is the only
tru TEUTH.
I kno the WIKED will DENI wot I say. BUT it is PROFED in the BIBEL.
Only Angels can xplain wot is. No EVIL LY like EVILUTION will giv us
the NEW DAWN.
MR PRESEDENT BUSH he KNO that it is ANGELS that mad us. HE is the one
that SMITE the HETHWEN and mak our CUNTRY FREEE, BRAV and NICE.
My PRAERS are for PRESDENT BUSH even tho he say INTLWEGENT DISIN, not
the propre FABULOUS ANGELIFICATION (like the filosifers do.
My PREERS are with YOU. EVEN YOU EVIL ETHISTS. YOU WILL KNO THAT IT IS
THE ANGALS OR BROL IN HELL IN THE DEP DA--TN THAT you KNO!!!
I RECT MY CESE. DETH TO THE UNGODLY WO DO NOT AGRE!!!
Fabulous Angelification is wot made me wot I am and the moncies too .
Ant the flours and the tres to.
\
So the.
Suc on that.
I wont
PRAZ HIM!!!
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
14 Aug 2005 01:36:54 AM |
|
|
"Amandla" <amandla@union.org.za> wrote
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard
Darwiniman Evolution, but now, entirely by the application
of logic, philosophy and the scientific redux, I have been
forced to change my position.
So you argue that life on Earth was created by space aliens who
flew here in their slying saucers and seeded our planet with DNA.
I disagree with you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
14 Aug 2005 07:33:17 PM |
|
|
Can the original poster possibly have made that many spelling mistakes
by accident !
I found these particularly entertaining for some reason.
quotes
SMITE the HETHWEN and mak our CUNTRY FREEE,
Ant the flours and the tres to
endquotes.
I did try to solve the "angels on the head of a pin" problem when I was
in high school but gave it up. Then realized the head of a pin is the
flat pushy part opposite end of the point. Then I got different answers
for the different types of pins, type of dance conducted, and
considered the relative size of angels depending on rank.
This led to the determination that two Archangels with flaming swords
could probably not successfully gavotte on the head of a normal size
dressmakers pin but Might manage a sedate waltz on the pins used for
corkboards.
I had never considered Angels line dancing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GWhyte" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
15 Aug 2005 07:06:38 AM |
|
|
<marks542004@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124065997.217377.297740@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Can the original poster possibly have made that many spelling mistakes
by accident !
I found these particularly entertaining for some reason.
quotes
SMITE the HETHWEN and mak our CUNTRY FREEE,
Ant the flours and the tres to
endquotes.
I did try to solve the "angels on the head of a pin" problem when I was
in high school but gave it up. Then realized the head of a pin is the
flat pushy part opposite end of the point. Then I got different answers
for the different types of pins, type of dance conducted, and
considered the relative size of angels depending on rank.
This led to the determination that two Archangels with flaming swords
could probably not successfully gavotte on the head of a normal size
dressmakers pin but Might manage a sedate waltz on the pins used for
corkboards.
I had never considered Angels line dancing.
For all those who still don't realise it, "Amandla" is a troll. He's writing
from South Africa using a slogan of the anti-apartheid struggle, cross-posts
to soc.culture.african-american and alt.prisons to give the impression that
he is black and can't spell properly.
A close analysis of his post will indicate that he seemed to have more
problems with spelling as he wrote. The mistakes are obviously "doctored".
Do yourselves a favour and don't waste more time on this thread.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morphys ghost" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
13 Aug 2005 09:28:41 PM |
|
|
"Amandla" <amandla@union.org.za> wrote in
news:1123892564.989481.49640@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
Is there any particular reason why you are crossposting this to
alt.prisons?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
12 Aug 2005 09:52:35 PM |
|
|
"Amandla" <amandla@union.org.za> wrote in
news:1123892564.989481.49640@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
There are MANY scientists who will not understand me. There are also
some who should KNOW BETER! The 'intelligent design' argument has
WON!!!
Although it has won, it is WRONG to call it that. GOD does not reveal
Hymself. HE is at one remove from the design. The philosophical
agumaent (and lots of philosphy groups and evolution GROUPS agree!!!)
is that if GOD is needed for Fabulous Angelification (they call it
Intelligant Design because they do not KNOW that it was ANGELS!!)..
GOD made the ANGELS to fabulate his PROMISE to make CREATION.
We have mathamatacal PROOF that HE did this with ANGELS. See the proof
in these statements - they KNOW not WHAT they DO, even though they are
right!!!!
http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/
http://www.ncseweb.org
http://www.crisismagazine.com/april2003/feature1.htm&ei=bjD9QvHEF4eKsQG
n8427Dg
http://www.origins.org/menus/design.html&ei=bjD9QvHEF4eKsQGn8427Dg
These articles PROVE that we are STARDUST made by ANGELS!
The ignorant think that we need to prove that GOD made GOD. That is
the mistake of Inteligant Design. We were made by ANGELS by a FABULOUS
incarnetion. The phioosofers get it wrong. We do not need to PROOVE
that GOD is there - even the ATHEISTS ans liars adn WHORES of BABYLON
kno that GOD is there. They just missed the philosiphical point that
it was ANGELS not GOD, so there is no argement!!!
I tell you. I tel you with deep wisdem. GOD will not be mocaed. HE
made the ANGELS and they made life. We kno that because ANGELS are not
that inteligint so they got it wron - like the appendixz
Only if they was tru to themself wood the INTELLEGINT DESIGN people
kno that we are made by desegn! STARDUST profs it. Fabel it C-now-en
tru. There is no argiment.
Now is time for EVIL to repent AN confes. EVILUTON is the DEVIL. He
make us SIN. We must apoligize and say FABULOUS EVOLUTION is the only
tru TEUTH.
I kno the WIKED will DENI wot I say. BUT it is PROFED in the BIBEL.
Only Angels can xplain wot is. No EVIL LY like EVILUTION will giv us
the NEW DAWN.
MR PRESEDENT BUSH he KNO that it is ANGELS that mad us. HE is the one
that SMITE the HETHWEN and mak our CUNTRY FREEE, BRAV and NICE.
My PRAERS are for PRESDENT BUSH even tho he say INTLWEGENT DISIN, not
the propre FABULOUS ANGELIFICATION (like the filosifers do.
My PREERS are with YOU. EVEN YOU EVIL ETHISTS. YOU WILL KNO THAT IT IS
THE ANGALS OR BROL IN HELL IN THE DEP DA--TN THAT you KNO!!!
I RECT MY CESE. DETH TO THE UNGODLY WO DO NOT AGRE!!!
Fabulous Angelification is wot made me wot I am and the moncies too .
Ant the flours and the tres to.
\
So the.
Suc on that.
I wont
PRAZ HIM!!!
Well, I'm trying to figure out if this is a bunch of real xian idiocy or
someone trying to parody xian idiocy? The line blurs.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
12 Aug 2005 11:41:46 PM |
|
|
Woden wrote:
"Amandla" <amandla@union.org.za> wrote in
news:1123892564.989481.49640@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
There are MANY scientists who will not understand me. There are also
some who should KNOW BETER! The 'intelligent design' argument has
WON!!!
Although it has won, it is WRONG to call it that. GOD does not reveal
Hymself. HE is at one remove from the design. The philosophical
agumaent (and lots of philosphy groups and evolution GROUPS agree!!!)
is that if GOD is needed for Fabulous Angelification (they call it
Intelligant Design because they do not KNOW that it was ANGELS!!)..
GOD made the ANGELS to fabulate his PROMISE to make CREATION.
We have mathamatacal PROOF that HE did this with ANGELS. See the proof
in these statements - they KNOW not WHAT they DO, even though they are
right!!!!
http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/
http://www.ncseweb.org
http://www.crisismagazine.com/april2003/feature1.htm&ei=bjD9QvHEF4eKsQG
n8427Dg
http://www.origins.org/menus/design.html&ei=bjD9QvHEF4eKsQGn8427Dg
These articles PROVE that we are STARDUST made by ANGELS!
The ignorant think that we need to prove that GOD made GOD. That is
the mistake of Inteligant Design. We were made by ANGELS by a FABULOUS
incarnetion. The phioosofers get it wrong. We do not need to PROOVE
that GOD is there - even the ATHEISTS ans liars adn WHORES of BABYLON
kno that GOD is there. They just missed the philosiphical point that
it was ANGELS not GOD, so there is no argement!!!
I tell you. I tel you with deep wisdem. GOD will not be mocaed. HE
made the ANGELS and they made life. We kno that because ANGELS are not
that inteligint so they got it wron - like the appendixz
Only if they was tru to themself wood the INTELLEGINT DESIGN people
kno that we are made by desegn! STARDUST profs it. Fabel it C-now-en
tru. There is no argiment.
Now is time for EVIL to repent AN confes. EVILUTON is the DEVIL. He
make us SIN. We must apoligize and say FABULOUS EVOLUTION is the only
tru TEUTH.
I kno the WIKED will DENI wot I say. BUT it is PROFED in the BIBEL.
Only Angels can xplain wot is. No EVIL LY like EVILUTION will giv us
the NEW DAWN.
MR PRESEDENT BUSH he KNO that it is ANGELS that mad us. HE is the one
that SMITE the HETHWEN and mak our CUNTRY FREEE, BRAV and NICE.
My PRAERS are for PRESDENT BUSH even tho he say INTLWEGENT DISIN, not
the propre FABULOUS ANGELIFICATION (like the filosifers do.
My PREERS are with YOU. EVEN YOU EVIL ETHISTS. YOU WILL KNO THAT IT IS
THE ANGALS OR BROL IN HELL IN THE DEP DA--TN THAT you KNO!!!
I RECT MY CESE. DETH TO THE UNGODLY WO DO NOT AGRE!!!
Fabulous Angelification is wot made me wot I am and the moncies too .
Ant the flours and the tres to.
\
So the.
Suc on that.
I wont
PRAZ HIM!!!
Well, I'm trying to figure out if this is a bunch of real xian idiocy or
someone trying to parody xian idiocy? The line blurs.
Indeed. *That* should send a signal to the "real xian". When a parody is
indistinguishable from your real message, you've got a problem!
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Panama Floyd" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
13 Aug 2005 12:52:52 PM |
|
|
Amandla wrote:
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
There are MANY scientists who will not understand me.
These folks might.
http://www.danversstateinsaneasylum.com/home.html
http://www.oboylephoto.com/state_hospital/
http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/travel/santaclara/agn.htm
I wish you luck.
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ordog" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
13 Aug 2005 12:58:37 AM |
|
|
Amandla wrote:
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
I just wonder what the "Soft Darwinian Evolution" might be like.
There are MANY scientists who will not understand me.
Many??????? I would wager, all of them!!!
There are also
some who should KNOW BETER! The 'intelligent design' argument has
WON!!!
No *****!
Although it has won, it is WRONG to call it that.
No kidding?!
GOD does not reveal
Hymself. HE is at one remove from the design. The philosophical
agumaent (and lots of philosphy groups and evolution GROUPS agree!!!)
providing they are run by Christians
is that if GOD is needed for Fabulous Angelification (they call it
Intelligant Design because they do not KNOW that it was ANGELS!!)..
GOD made the ANGELS to fabulate his PROMISE to make CREATION.
We have mathamatacal PROOF that HE did this with ANGELS.
Oh my!
<Rest snipped and teleported to the electronic nirvana>
Ordog
"Beware of the man whose God is in the skies." Bernard Shaw
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
13 Aug 2005 02:18:15 AM |
|
|
Amandla wrote:
GOD made the ANGELS to fabulate his PROMISE to make CREATION.
We have mathamatacal PROOF that HE did this with ANGELS.
And we have equally valid mathematical proof that 'Amandla' is no
better at fabulating than he is at spelling.
fab·u·late P Pronunciation Key (fby-lt)
intr.v. fab·u·lat·ed, fab·u·lat·ing, fab·u·lates
To engage in the composition of fables or stories, especially those in
which the element of fantasy comes into heavy play: ła land which... had
given itself up to dreaming, to fabulating, to tale-telling (Lawrence
Durrell).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
13 Aug 2005 12:32:26 PM |
|
|
on 12 Aug 2005 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Ordog (odbok001@sneakemail.com)
made the light shine upon us with this:
Amandla wrote:
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
I just wonder what the "Soft Darwinian Evolution" might be like
Probably like Darwin over easy.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
http://home.comcast.net/~vickman/
______________
'03 XVS650A
'04 XVS1100
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ash" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
20 Aug 2005 05:32:07 AM |
|
|
Amandla wrote:
snip 3/10
You had the ignorance, poor spelling, inappropriate capitalisation. all
the ingredients were there, but somehow, the overall product just didn't
work
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
13 Aug 2005 07:04:03 AM |
|
|
In episode <1123892564.989481.49640@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Amandla
burst into the room and exclaimed:
There are MANY scientists who will not understand me.
Huh. Wonder why.
There are also some
who should KNOW BETER! The 'intelligent design' argument has WON!!!
Maybe in your little mind but that's about all.
The number of "scientists" pushing ID could still be listed on a sheet of
paper while by contrast the membership of only *one scientific
organization of *one country (the NAS of the US) is 2200 people.
That's why the advocates of ID have resorted to politics to achieve their
goals. They know they can only convince people who do *not* have the
education, knowledge, and expertise to evaluate their claims.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million
monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet
is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" -- Blair Houghton
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
12 Aug 2005 09:08:10 PM |
|
|
On 12 Aug 2005 17:22:45 -0700, "Amandla" <amandla@union.org.za> wrote:
:
I tell you. I tel you with deep wisdem.
:
That about sums it up...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
14 Aug 2005 11:52:36 PM |
|
|
On 12 Aug 2005 17:22:45 -0700, "Amandla" <amandla@union.org.za> wrote:
I must declare myself.
So you're checking into the lockdown ward of the local looney bin.
Good on ya.
[]
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gail Futoran" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
13 Aug 2005 10:18:03 AM |
|
|
[newsgroups trimmed]
"Amandla" <amandla@union.org.za> wrote in message
news:1123892564.989481.49640@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
Liar. No one can go on as you do in the rest of
your post and have any slight comprehension of
the scientific method.
There are MANY scientists who will not understand me. There are also
some who should KNOW BETER! The 'intelligent design' argument has
WON!!!
Only among the lunatic fringe - unfortunately about
half the USA given voting results from 2000 and 2004.
[big snip to avoid barfing up my breakfast oatmeal]
PRAZ HIM!!!
I'm hoping that was all a joke. I would think that no
one capable of turning on a computer and logging onto
the Internet and composing a post (however badly
written) is that frelling STOOPID! But I can be naive...
BTW, how many angels do dance on the head
of a pin? [for those who haven't progressed in
scientific understanding since the Dark Ages]
Gail
Warrior Gardener aa#2247 ["Shiny..."]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: Fabulous Angelification |
13 Aug 2005 12:30:30 PM |
|
|
on 12 Aug 2005 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Amandla (amandla@union.org.za)
made the light shine upon us with this:
I must declare myself. I was a skeptic and believed in Hard Darwiniman
Evolution, but now, entirely by the application of logic, philosophy
and the scientific redux, I have been forced to change my position.
There are MANY scientists who will not understand me. There are also
some who should KNOW BETER! The 'intelligent design' argument has
WON!!!
Although it has won, it is WRONG to call it that. GOD does not reveal
Hymself. HE is at one remove from the design. The philosophical
agumaent (and lots of philosphy groups and evolution GROUPS agree!!!)
is that if GOD is needed for Fabulous Angelification (they call it
Intelligant Design because they do not KNOW that it was ANGELS!!)..
GOD made the ANGELS to fabulate his PROMISE to make CREATION.
We have mathamatacal PROOF that HE did this with ANGELS. See the proof
in these statements - they KNOW not WHAT they DO, even though they are
right!!!!
<***** SLAP!>
It never ceases to amaze me that there are still people like this alive in
this day and age. For humanity's sake, this is the 21st century, folks.
Do you think we can all crawl out from under our beds now and face the
light of day? No, leave the fucking teddy bear where it is, the nurse
will collect them.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
http://home.comcast.net/~vickman/
______________
'03 XVS650A
'04 XVS1100
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
