Religions > Atheism > Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Randy Jabsco" |
| Date: |
20 Dec 2003 06:55:16 PM |
| Object: |
Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
Hey faggots, I'm still confused. Help me out here. Didn't you faggots say
that the tide has changed and that EVERYONE is accepting faggots now, and
that only a few minor bigots won't accept? Didn't you say the majority of
people are accepting ***** behavior? I don't understand this article, I am
very confused. Why is it that faggots can only be accepted by imposing
their will on other people and seeking out sypathetic judges to change laws
for them? How come they can't take their case to the 'majority public' in
the voting booths? Surely if EVERYONE is accepting faggots now, they should
EASILY get these laws passed on the ballots!! Why is it that 38 states now
have a consititutional ban on ***** marriages if the majority of the voters
want otherwise? Help me out here...
===
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/21/national/21GAY.html?ex=1073192400&en=a887ec494ccc1c01&ei=5004&partner=UNTD
Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage
The latest New York Times/CBS News poll has found widespread support for an
amendment to the United States Constitution to ban gay marriage. It also
found unease about homosexual relations in general, making the issue a
potentially divisive one for the Democrats and an opportunity for the
Republicans in the 2004 election.
Support for a constitutional amendment extends across a wide swath of the
public and includes a majority of people traditionally viewed as supportive
of gay rights, including Democrats, women and people who live on the East
Coast.
Attitudes on the subject seem to be inextricably linked to how people view
marriage itself. For a majority of Americans - 53 percent - marriage is
largely a religious matter. Seventy-one percent of those people oppose gay
marriage. Similarly, 33 percent of Americans say marriage is largely a legal
matter and a majority of those people - 55 percent - say they support gay
marriage.
The most positive feelings toward gay people were registered among
respondents under 30, and among those who knew gay people.
The nationwide poll found that 55 percent of Americans favored an amendment
to the constitution that would allow marriage only between a man and a
woman, while 40 percent opposed the idea.
The findings come after the highest court in Massachusetts ruled 4 to 3 last
month that same-sex marriage was permissible under the state's Constitution.
That ruling followed a 6-to-3 decision in late June by the United States
Supreme Court striking down antisodomy laws.
President Bush had been noncommittal about a constitutional amendment
immediately after the Massachusetts ruling, with the administration worried
that support for a ban on gay marriage would alienate moderate voters. But
last week Mr. Bush for the first time voiced his support, saying, "I will
support a constitutional amendment which would honor marriage between a man
and a woman, codify that."
The statement signals the White House's increasing confidence that it can
exploit the matter in the presidential campaign, both to energize its
evangelical supporters and to discredit the eventual Democratic nominee.
Most of the Democratic candidates oppose gay marriage but favor civil
unions. Howard Dean, who is leading in the polls for the Democratic
nomination, signed a law when he was governor of Vermont allowing civil
unions, an action that Republicans have already used to portray him as too
liberal for mainstream America.
The court rulings generated extensive publicity and concern, not only about
same-sex marriage but also about having the courts set social agendas that
have not been approved by the legislative process.
"We have found that the more people focus on it, the less they support it,"
said the Rev. Lou Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition,
which strongly opposes gay marriage and is working actively for a
constitutional ban.
The Times/CBS News poll was conducted from Dec. 10 through Dec. 13 in
telephone interviews with 1,057 people. It carries a margin of sampling
error of plus or minus three percentage points. Responses about gay rights
tend to be influenced somewhat by the wording of the questions.
This poll and other surveys show that as the courts have extended legal
rights to gays this year, Americans have become increasingly uncomfortable
with same-sex relations.
For decades, a majority of Americans have not approved of homosexual
relations. That had begun to change, until the Supreme Court ruling in June
and the Massachusetts ruling in November. A New York Times/CBS News poll
conducted in July found that 54 percent of respondents said homosexual
relations should be legal. Only 41 percent of the respondents in the latest
poll said they should be legal.
Richard Waters, 71, a retired elementary school teacher in Little Valley,
N.Y., and a Republican, said in a follow-up interview to the poll that he
strongly supported a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.
.
|
|
| User: "Al Ongapo" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
24 Dec 2003 11:46:58 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:07:13 GMT, "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote:
<Al Ongapo> wrote in message
news:3e832461cbb6aded5b6cb23c2ee5aca0@news.teranews.com...
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:09:41 GMT, "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote:
<Al Ongapo> wrote in message
news:24a171107b2161fdf55c905c921e7ae9@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:22:34 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On 22 Dec 2003 09:32:58 -0500, <ahall@no-spam-panix.com> posted in
alt.atheism:
It is a national embarrassment that gays are still
second class citizens.
Second-class citizenship is a national disgrace in any country in
which any citizens are considered "second class"
Homosexuality, on the other hand, is a burden of disease and
immorality on any society.
Idiot.
Yes. And one have to wonder why homos can't stop ***** fucking each
other to save their life!
Obviously news to you: They like it.
They must -- Because in spite of the fact that it has been know for
more than two decades that such behavior is the number one cause of
HIV/AIDS transmission in the US homo's just keep on keeping on. One
has to wonder, "If it made their ***** rot off in six weeks rather than
killing them in 15 years would they would still continue to screw
each other in the *****?" I suspect that a homosexual male with out a
***** would be shunned by his fellow ***** suckers as a freak.
You seem to be under the impression that all people are like you.
You want all people to be and think like you and you are trying to
force it on society through your efforts toward ssm.
They aren't.
You won't
That's good.
That's better
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
24 Dec 2003 06:13:43 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:46:58 GMT, Al Ongapo posted to alt.atheism:
They must -- Because in spite of the fact that it has been know for
more than two decades that such behavior is the number one cause of
HIV/AIDS transmission in the US homo's just keep on keeping on.
"Known" only to the ignorant. The ONLY cause of HIV is the virus that
causes it. Anal sex doesn't cause it any more than peeling carrots
does.
One has to wonder, "If it made their ***** rot off in six weeks rather than
killing them in 15 years would they would still continue to screw
each other in the *****?"
Dunno. Would you?
I suspect that a homosexual male with out a
***** would be shunned by his fellow ***** suckers as a freak.
Nah, they'd still like you.
--
"Damn. Looks like all of usenet agrees that you don't have the logical
faculties to prove the statement 'dogshit is not peanut butter' if we
gave you a jar of each and a box of crackers" - John Hattan to Tichy
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Ongapo" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
24 Dec 2003 09:09:49 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 19:13:43 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:46:58 GMT, Al Ongapo posted to alt.atheism:
They must -- Because in spite of the fact that it has been know for
more than two decades that such behavior is the number one cause of
HIV/AIDS transmission in the US homo's just keep on keeping on.
"Known" only to the ignorant. The ONLY cause of HIV is the virus that
causes it. Anal sex doesn't cause it any more than peeling carrots
does.
Look ***** WIPE! I'm getting tired of having to define every fucking
word in a post in order for you to understand it. Either make an
effort to learn the meaning of words like "TRANSMISSION" relative
to a disease or SHUT THE ***** UP!
Now that I explained it all to you nicely -- I do hope that you will
try to get yourself straight, boy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
24 Dec 2003 09:58:26 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:09:49 GMT, Al Ongapo posted to alt.atheism:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 19:13:43 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:46:58 GMT, Al Ongapo posted to alt.atheism:
They must -- Because in spite of the fact that it has been know for
more than two decades that such behavior is the number one cause of
HIV/AIDS transmission in the US homo's just keep on keeping on.
"Known" only to the ignorant. The ONLY cause of HIV is the virus that
causes it. Anal sex doesn't cause it any more than peeling carrots
does.
Look ***** WIPE! I'm getting tired of having to define every fucking
word in a post in order for you to understand it. Either make an
effort to learn the meaning of words like "TRANSMISSION" relative
to a disease or SHUT THE ***** UP!
Oh? You have no argument? Okay.
Now that I explained it all to you nicely -- I do hope that you will
try to get yourself straight, boy.
As soon as you get yourself intelligent.
No, strike that - I've been straight longer than you've been alive.
And you'll never be intelligent.
--
"He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my
contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him, the
spinal cord would fully suffice."
- Albert Einstein
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on GayMarriage |
24 Dec 2003 03:50:06 PM |
|
|
in article fa829c4b685fada2814812acfcdbf2ab@news.teranews.com, Al Ongapo at
Al Ongapo wrote on 12/24/03 11:46 AM:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:07:13 GMT, "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote:
<Al Ongapo> wrote in message
news:3e832461cbb6aded5b6cb23c2ee5aca0@news.teranews.com...
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:09:41 GMT, "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote:
<Al Ongapo> wrote in message
news:24a171107b2161fdf55c905c921e7ae9@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:22:34 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On 22 Dec 2003 09:32:58 -0500, <ahall@no-spam-panix.com> posted in
alt.atheism:
It is a national embarrassment that gays are still
second class citizens.
Second-class citizenship is a national disgrace in any country in
which any citizens are considered "second class"
Homosexuality, on the other hand, is a burden of disease and
immorality on any society.
Idiot.
Yes. And one have to wonder why homos can't stop ***** fucking each
other to save their life!
Obviously news to you: They like it.
They must -- Because in spite of the fact that it has been know for
more than two decades that such behavior is the number one cause of
HIV/AIDS transmission in the US homo's just keep on keeping on. One
has to wonder, "If it made their ***** rot off in six weeks rather than
killing them in 15 years would they would still continue to screw
each other in the *****?" I suspect that a homosexual male with out a
***** would be shunned by his fellow ***** suckers as a freak.
You seem to be under the impression that all people are like you.
You want all people to be and think like you and you are trying to
force it on society through your efforts toward ssm.
Yah. Cuz a few gays getting married can cause you to turn gay as well,
right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
24 Dec 2003 08:04:16 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:50:06 -0600, Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com>
posted to alt.atheism:
in article fa829c4b685fada2814812acfcdbf2ab@news.teranews.com, Al Ongapo at
Al Ongapo wrote on 12/24/03 11:46 AM:
You want all people to be and think like you and you are trying to
force it on society through your efforts toward ssm.
Yah. Cuz a few gays getting married can cause you to turn gay as well,
right?
That's exactly what they're afraid of - that it would force them to
admit that they want a husband too.
--
"A truly unselfish act would be a Christian volunteering to have his soul take your
soul's place in hell, so yours could go to Heaven. Don't hold your breath."
- John Popelish
&
"The United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion"
- Treaty of Tripoli, 1797, ratified by Congress
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Ongapo" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
24 Dec 2003 09:03:17 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 21:04:16 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
(...)
That's exactly what they're afraid of - that it would force them to
admit that they want a husband too.
Yes, the females among we hets prefer the traditional male husband.
So you see you really have nothing to fear but you heterophobia
itself. Have you considered psychiatric help from your local free
clinic -- there should be one near your trailer park.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 12:23:27 AM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:03:17 GMT, a stranger
called by some Al Ongapo came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Yes, the females among we hets prefer the traditional male husband.
Well, no *****. They're striaght, of course they are attracted to men!
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roger" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 12:32:22 AM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:tg0luvcp5mo10gp8eljs4q2ea3soqmu5sk@4ax.com...
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:03:17 GMT, a stranger
called by some Al Ongapo came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Yes, the females among we hets prefer the traditional male husband.
Well, no *****. They're striaght, of course they are attracted to men!
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
You're going to be waiting a looooooooooooooong time.
There are none.
Bigotry and ignorance are their only justifications.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 12:32:32 AM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
So far y'all haven't offered a single compelling legal or other reason
for the society to support counterproductive mating.
Bob
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 12:40:43 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:32:32 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
So far y'all haven't offered a single compelling legal or other reason
for the society to support counterproductive mating.
Bob, try to get this through your head:
Sterile people are allowed to marry.
People unable to have sex are allowed to marry.
People who cannot safely carry a preganancy to term are allowed to
marry.
People who just don't want kids are allowed to marry.
We already grant marriage to people who don't reproduce. So, there's
my argument. Now, where's your compelling legal argument?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 03:05:42 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:32:32 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
So far y'all haven't offered a single compelling legal or other reason
for the society to support counterproductive mating.
try to get this through your head:
Sterile people are allowed to marry.
People unable to have sex are allowed to marry.
People who cannot safely carry a preganancy to term are allowed to
marry.
People who just don't want kids are allowed to marry.
We already grant marriage to people who don't reproduce. So, there's
my argument. Now, where's your compelling legal argument?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
Filthy rump rider scum. It's brain dead.
-- PLOINK --
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 04:00:50 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:05:42 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:32:32 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
So far y'all haven't offered a single compelling legal or other reason
for the society to support counterproductive mating.
try to get this through your head:
Sterile people are allowed to marry.
People unable to have sex are allowed to marry.
People who cannot safely carry a preganancy to term are allowed to
marry.
People who just don't want kids are allowed to marry.
We already grant marriage to people who don't reproduce. So, there's
my argument. Now, where's your compelling legal argument?
Filthy rump rider scum. It's brain dead.
-- PLOINK --
LOL! When faced with facts, Bob can't do anything but scream insults
and run away screaming "I can't hear you! Nyah nyah nyah!"
Bye Bob! It's been fun exposing you as the loser you are! (It's
spelled "plonk". Happy to help..)
So, anybody want to actually provide a compelling legal reason why
gays should not be allowed to marry?
"They can't procreate" isn't an argument, as we already allow people
who can't/don want to have children to marry.
"It's never existed" isn't an argument, since before 1920, women
voting for President hadn't existed. Yet it became law.
"Gays spread disease" isn't an argument, since heterosexuals do just
as good a job spreading STDs as gays do. Also, marriage encourages
monogamy. People in monogamous relationships don't spread diseases.
"Being gay is a behavior, and shouldn't be protected" isn't a legal
case. Keep to the legal side.
I've been waiting for years to see a good case made. I'm a patient
man.. I can wait until someone manages to make one.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Turin" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
26 Dec 2003 11:25:24 AM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<11nmuv0uf3ceqtai9if5v9m0vf72reo4oj@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:05:42 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:32:32 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
So far y'all haven't offered a single compelling legal or other reason
for the society to support counterproductive mating.
try to get this through your head:
Sterile people are allowed to marry.
People unable to have sex are allowed to marry.
People who cannot safely carry a preganancy to term are allowed to
marry.
People who just don't want kids are allowed to marry.
We already grant marriage to people who don't reproduce. So, there's
my argument. Now, where's your compelling legal argument?
Filthy rump rider scum. It's brain dead.
-- PLOINK --
LOL! When faced with facts, Bob can't do anything but scream insults
and run away screaming "I can't hear you! Nyah nyah nyah!"
Bye Bob! It's been fun exposing you as the loser you are! (It's
spelled "plonk". Happy to help..)
Bob's problem is nothing more than the fact that he's too stupid to
say anything accurate on politics or anything else because he's been
commercially programmed by a media which has a vested interest in
target marketing morons like him by continuing "coverage" on a cold
war that doesn't exist anymore. It not only gets idiots like him to
keep buying things for demographical reasons, it takes attention off
of the obvious fact of their own "liberal" activities.
Well, he's a mindless bigot, too.
- - -
This has been another enlightening moment, with:
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://members.fortunecity.com/turinturambar/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Men_First/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Men_Politics/
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
So, anybody want to actually provide a compelling legal reason why
gays should not be allowed to marry?
"They can't procreate" isn't an argument, as we already allow people
who can't/don want to have children to marry.
"It's never existed" isn't an argument, since before 1920, women
voting for President hadn't existed. Yet it became law.
"Gays spread disease" isn't an argument, since heterosexuals do just
as good a job spreading STDs as gays do. Also, marriage encourages
monogamy. People in monogamous relationships don't spread diseases.
"Being gay is a behavior, and shouldn't be protected" isn't a legal
case. Keep to the legal side.
I've been waiting for years to see a good case made. I'm a patient
man.. I can wait until someone manages to make one.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
27 Dec 2003 07:55:31 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:00:50 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>, Message ID:
<11nmuv0uf3ceqtai9if5v9m0vf72reo4oj@4ax.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:05:42 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:32:32 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
So far y'all haven't offered a single compelling legal or other reason
for the society to support counterproductive mating.
try to get this through your head:
Sterile people are allowed to marry.
People unable to have sex are allowed to marry.
People who cannot safely carry a preganancy to term are allowed to
marry.
People who just don't want kids are allowed to marry.
We already grant marriage to people who don't reproduce. So, there's
my argument. Now, where's your compelling legal argument?
Filthy rump rider scum. It's brain dead.
-- PLOINK --
LOL! When faced with facts, Bob can't do anything but scream insults
and run away screaming "I can't hear you! Nyah nyah nyah!"
Bye Bob! It's been fun exposing you as the loser you are! (It's
spelled "plonk". Happy to help..)
So, anybody want to actually provide a compelling legal reason why
gays should not be allowed to marry?
"They can't procreate" isn't an argument, as we already allow people
who can't/don want to have children to marry.
"It's never existed" isn't an argument, since before 1920, women
voting for President hadn't existed. Yet it became law.
"Gays spread disease" isn't an argument, since heterosexuals do just
as good a job spreading STDs as gays do. Also, marriage encourages
monogamy. People in monogamous relationships don't spread diseases.
"Being gay is a behavior, and shouldn't be protected" isn't a legal
case. Keep to the legal side.
I've been waiting for years to see a good case made. I'm a patient
man.. I can wait until someone manages to make one.
Forlorn and futile wait.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
27 Dec 2003 07:54:06 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:05:42 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>, Message
ID: <3FEB5126.7070502@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:32:32 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
So far y'all haven't offered a single compelling legal or other reason
for the society to support counterproductive mating.
try to get this through your head:
Sterile people are allowed to marry.
People unable to have sex are allowed to marry.
People who cannot safely carry a preganancy to term are allowed to
marry.
People who just don't want kids are allowed to marry.
We already grant marriage to people who don't reproduce. So, there's
my argument. Now, where's your compelling legal argument?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
Filthy rump rider scum. It's brain dead.
-- PLOINK --
Oh, the irony! Not only does he recognize his 'argument' wasn't, but it
drooled "brain dead" while misspelling 'plonk!' (peals of laughter)
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
27 Dec 2003 07:51:47 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:32:32 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>, Message
ID: <3FEA8480.5020800@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
So far y'all haven't offered a single compelling legal or other reason
for the society to support counterproductive mating.
Damn! Bigotry and ignorance personified.
So, you're against heterosexual marriages where the two have no
intention of having offspring or are beyond the offspring carrying
years.
You're a bigoted and ignorant hypocritical fool, "Bob."
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Quando Omni" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 10:29:03 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:23:27 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:03:17 GMT, a stranger
called by some Al Ongapo came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Yes, the females among we hets prefer the traditional male husband.
Well, no *****. They're striaght, of course they are attracted to men!
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
Homosexual marriage does not exist in the US. That's why you can't
engage in it. You cant do what doesn't exist. You can't ride a
unicorn.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 11:35:58 AM |
|
|
<Quando Omni> wrote in message
news:d2abf55241867304f09178b96d9c9b8c@news.teranews.com...
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:23:27 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:03:17 GMT, a stranger
called by some Al Ongapo came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Yes, the females among we hets prefer the traditional male husband.
Well, no *****. They're striaght, of course they are attracted to men!
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
Homosexual marriage does not exist in the US. That's why you can't
engage in it. You cant do what doesn't exist. You can't ride a
unicorn.
Inter-racial marriage didn't exist before anti-miscegenation laws were
overturned, and women couldn't vote before the suffrage movement.
Skipped eighth-grade civics, eh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
27 Dec 2003 07:59:09 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 09:35:58 -0800, "Dennis Kemmerer"
<dk@suespammers.org>, Message ID:
<bsf9c6$chi21$1@ID-120990.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in alt.atheism;
<Quando Omni> wrote in message
news:d2abf55241867304f09178b96d9c9b8c@news.teranews.com...
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:23:27 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:03:17 GMT, a stranger
called by some Al Ongapo came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Yes, the females among we hets prefer the traditional male husband.
Well, no *****. They're striaght, of course they are attracted to men!
Lesbians aren't. They want to marry other women. And so far none of
y'all have offered a single compelling legal cause for not allowing
this to happen.
Homosexual marriage does not exist in the US. That's why you can't
engage in it. You cant do what doesn't exist. You can't ride a
unicorn.
Inter-racial marriage didn't exist before anti-miscegenation laws were
overturned, and women couldn't vote before the suffrage movement.
Skipped eighth-grade civics, eh?
"Bob" was prime 'butt buddy' for the priests. With all his 'holy spurt'
injections there wasn't any room left for either education or thought.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 12:42:34 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:29:03 GMT, a stranger
called by some Quando Omni came forth and told this tale in
alt.atheism
Homosexual marriage does not exist in the US. That's why you can't
engage in it. You cant do what doesn't exist. You can't ride a
unicorn.
Until 1967. interracial marriage was illegal in several states. It's
legal now.
So your argument fails before it is started.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Quando Omni" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 01:15:55 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 18:42:34 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:29:03 GMT, a stranger
called by some Quando Omni came forth and told this tale in
alt.atheism
Homosexual marriage does not exist in the US. That's why you can't
engage in it. You cant do what doesn't exist. You can't ride a
unicorn.
Until 1967. interracial marriage was illegal in several states. It's
legal now.
Please try to stay on topic. The discussion is about homosexuality a
perverted sexual orientation and as has been noted, its desire to ride
a unicorn, not ones race or ethnicity.
So your argument fails before it is started.
Obviously that is self questioning...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
25 Dec 2003 04:07:58 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 19:15:55 GMT, a stranger
called by some Quando Omni came forth and told this tale in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 18:42:34 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Until 1967. interracial marriage was illegal in several states. It's
legal now.
Please try to stay on topic. The discussion is about homosexuality a
perverted sexual orientation and as has been noted, its desire to ride
a unicorn, not ones race or ethnicity.
In places like Alabama dating outside your race was an considered
offence against what God intended. You could get lynched for doing
it.
Another point. I know gay men and women. You are discussing the
subject with a bi man. Unicorns are mythical creatures, based on
stories about the rhino. We are discusing, again, reality.
What you think about other people's sex lives is not important when
discussing human and legal rights. We are discussing marraige rights,
so previous court decisions on the topic are on topic. Loving v.
Virginia established that in the US, marriage is considered a
fundamental human right.
Now, give me a compelling legal reason why adult American citizens
should be denied that right. The fact that it never existed before is
not a compelling reason. In fact, it is the worst argument I think
I've ever heard.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
