Religions > Atheism > Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Randy Jabsco" |
| Date: |
20 Dec 2003 06:55:16 PM |
| Object: |
Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
Hey faggots, I'm still confused. Help me out here. Didn't you faggots say
that the tide has changed and that EVERYONE is accepting faggots now, and
that only a few minor bigots won't accept? Didn't you say the majority of
people are accepting ***** behavior? I don't understand this article, I am
very confused. Why is it that faggots can only be accepted by imposing
their will on other people and seeking out sypathetic judges to change laws
for them? How come they can't take their case to the 'majority public' in
the voting booths? Surely if EVERYONE is accepting faggots now, they should
EASILY get these laws passed on the ballots!! Why is it that 38 states now
have a consititutional ban on ***** marriages if the majority of the voters
want otherwise? Help me out here...
===
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/21/national/21GAY.html?ex=1073192400&en=a887ec494ccc1c01&ei=5004&partner=UNTD
Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage
The latest New York Times/CBS News poll has found widespread support for an
amendment to the United States Constitution to ban gay marriage. It also
found unease about homosexual relations in general, making the issue a
potentially divisive one for the Democrats and an opportunity for the
Republicans in the 2004 election.
Support for a constitutional amendment extends across a wide swath of the
public and includes a majority of people traditionally viewed as supportive
of gay rights, including Democrats, women and people who live on the East
Coast.
Attitudes on the subject seem to be inextricably linked to how people view
marriage itself. For a majority of Americans - 53 percent - marriage is
largely a religious matter. Seventy-one percent of those people oppose gay
marriage. Similarly, 33 percent of Americans say marriage is largely a legal
matter and a majority of those people - 55 percent - say they support gay
marriage.
The most positive feelings toward gay people were registered among
respondents under 30, and among those who knew gay people.
The nationwide poll found that 55 percent of Americans favored an amendment
to the constitution that would allow marriage only between a man and a
woman, while 40 percent opposed the idea.
The findings come after the highest court in Massachusetts ruled 4 to 3 last
month that same-sex marriage was permissible under the state's Constitution.
That ruling followed a 6-to-3 decision in late June by the United States
Supreme Court striking down antisodomy laws.
President Bush had been noncommittal about a constitutional amendment
immediately after the Massachusetts ruling, with the administration worried
that support for a ban on gay marriage would alienate moderate voters. But
last week Mr. Bush for the first time voiced his support, saying, "I will
support a constitutional amendment which would honor marriage between a man
and a woman, codify that."
The statement signals the White House's increasing confidence that it can
exploit the matter in the presidential campaign, both to energize its
evangelical supporters and to discredit the eventual Democratic nominee.
Most of the Democratic candidates oppose gay marriage but favor civil
unions. Howard Dean, who is leading in the polls for the Democratic
nomination, signed a law when he was governor of Vermont allowing civil
unions, an action that Republicans have already used to portray him as too
liberal for mainstream America.
The court rulings generated extensive publicity and concern, not only about
same-sex marriage but also about having the courts set social agendas that
have not been approved by the legislative process.
"We have found that the more people focus on it, the less they support it,"
said the Rev. Lou Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition,
which strongly opposes gay marriage and is working actively for a
constitutional ban.
The Times/CBS News poll was conducted from Dec. 10 through Dec. 13 in
telephone interviews with 1,057 people. It carries a margin of sampling
error of plus or minus three percentage points. Responses about gay rights
tend to be influenced somewhat by the wording of the questions.
This poll and other surveys show that as the courts have extended legal
rights to gays this year, Americans have become increasingly uncomfortable
with same-sex relations.
For decades, a majority of Americans have not approved of homosexual
relations. That had begun to change, until the Supreme Court ruling in June
and the Massachusetts ruling in November. A New York Times/CBS News poll
conducted in July found that 54 percent of respondents said homosexual
relations should be legal. Only 41 percent of the respondents in the latest
poll said they should be legal.
Richard Waters, 71, a retired elementary school teacher in Little Valley,
N.Y., and a Republican, said in a follow-up interview to the poll that he
strongly supported a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.
.
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
08 Jan 2004 09:39:10 PM |
|
|
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or else you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your language use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing Christian that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
08 Jan 2004 09:54:40 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE225E.4010503@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or else you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your language
use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing Christian that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
wow...my guesses about bob? Are you Bob Dole? That's the only bob I know
that called himself by his name instead of "me"...or are you just so
important that you can't be so informal?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
08 Jan 2004 10:06:07 PM |
|
|
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE225E.4010503@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or else you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your language
use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing Christian that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
wow...my guesses about bob? Are you Bob Dole? That's the only bob I know
that called himself by his name instead of "me"...or are you just so
important that you can't be so informal?
Bob is more important than Mr. Dole. If you don't like the writing
style don't read the posts.
Bob
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
08 Jan 2004 10:16:21 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE28AF.5050809@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE225E.4010503@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can
actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or else you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight
people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your
language
use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing Christian that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
wow...my guesses about bob? Are you Bob Dole? That's the only bob I know
that called himself by his name instead of "me"...or are you just so
important that you can't be so informal?
Bob is more important than Mr. Dole. If you don't like the writing
style don't read the posts.
Bob
Oh, Damn this is fun! A narcissist with delusions of superiority and
grandeur...
Answer the question.
How does legal recognition of a civil union of (my) rump rider (or lolly
licker) buddies make any
difference (to) the age old institution of marriage?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roger" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
08 Jan 2004 11:25:46 PM |
|
|
"Amelia M. Samples" <milla@georgebush.visi.com> wrote in message
news:pWpLb.1947$LW.1732@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE28AF.5050809@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE225E.4010503@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can
actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or else
you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight
people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have
answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your
language
use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing Christian
that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I
close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your
lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
wow...my guesses about bob? Are you Bob Dole? That's the only bob I
know
that called himself by his name instead of "me"...or are you just so
important that you can't be so informal?
Bob is more important than Mr. Dole. If you don't like the writing
style don't read the posts.
Bob
Oh, Damn this is fun! A narcissist with delusions of superiority and
grandeur...
Answer the question.
How does legal recognition of a civil union of (my) rump rider (or lolly
licker) buddies make any
difference (to) the age old institution of marriage?
They think it's mandatory.
(Thanks, Jon Stewart.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
08 Jan 2004 11:36:38 PM |
|
|
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uXqLb.8760$MF5.864@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
"Amelia M. Samples" <milla@georgebush.visi.com> wrote in message
news:pWpLb.1947$LW.1732@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE28AF.5050809@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE225E.4010503@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can
actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or else
you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight
people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have
answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your
language
use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing Christian
that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I
close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your
lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and
apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
wow...my guesses about bob? Are you Bob Dole? That's the only bob I
know
that called himself by his name instead of "me"...or are you just so
important that you can't be so informal?
Bob is more important than Mr. Dole. If you don't like the writing
style don't read the posts.
Bob
Oh, Damn this is fun! A narcissist with delusions of superiority and
grandeur...
Answer the question.
How does legal recognition of a civil union of (my) rump rider (or lolly
licker) buddies make any
difference (to) the age old institution of marriage?
They think it's mandatory.
(Thanks, Jon Stewart.)
I don't follow...who thinks what's madatory?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roger" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
08 Jan 2004 11:40:14 PM |
|
|
"Amelia M. Samples" <milla@georgebush.visi.com> wrote in message
news:G5rLb.1960$LW.1528@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uXqLb.8760$MF5.864@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
"Amelia M. Samples" <milla@georgebush.visi.com> wrote in message
news:pWpLb.1947$LW.1732@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE28AF.5050809@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE225E.4010503@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can
actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or
else
you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight
people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of
my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have
answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends
are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your
language
use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing
Christian
that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I
close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your
lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and
apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
wow...my guesses about bob? Are you Bob Dole? That's the only bob
I
know
that called himself by his name instead of "me"...or are you just
so
important that you can't be so informal?
Bob is more important than Mr. Dole. If you don't like the writing
style don't read the posts.
Bob
Oh, Damn this is fun! A narcissist with delusions of superiority and
grandeur...
Answer the question.
How does legal recognition of a civil union of (my) rump rider (or
lolly
licker) buddies make any
difference (to) the age old institution of marriage?
They think it's mandatory.
(Thanks, Jon Stewart.)
I don't follow...who thinks what's madatory?
Some straights seem to think that gay marriage is mandatory.
Otherwise, it has no impact on them. Why else would they care?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 12:01:29 AM |
|
|
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE28AF.5050809@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE225E.4010503@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can
actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or else you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight
people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your
language
use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing Christian that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
wow...my guesses about bob? Are you Bob Dole? That's the only bob I know
that called himself by his name instead of "me"...or are you just so
important that you can't be so informal?
Bob is more important than Mr. Dole. If you don't like the writing
style don't read the posts.
Bob
Oh, Damn this is fun! A narcissist with delusions of superiority and
grandeur...
Answer the question.
How does legal recognition of a civil union of (my) rump rider (or lolly
licker) buddies make any
difference (to) the age old institution of marriage?
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 10:43:44 AM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE43B9.5060807@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE28AF.5050809@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE225E.4010503@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE1758.4060909@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE13EB.205@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
I know I'm asking a lot...I was just hoping to see if he can
actually
pull
something besides his fist out of his *****...
YOU obviously have your head where the sun don't shine, or else
you
would answer a simple question.
It's so much easier just to spew your typical hate of straight
people.
Is that why you are so adamant about destroying marriage?
I don't hate straight people. My parents are straight, most of my
friends
are straight, my boss is straight, I hate homophobes. I have
answered
your
question, could you please answer mine?
Nice try at a lolly licker version of "Some of my best friends are
niggers." Sorry Toots, that one don't fly either.
When you get done dodging, answer the question.
I've given at least 10 answers to your silly question. And your
language
use
above tells me exactly who you are. You are a right wing Christian
that
thinks he's better than anyone else except "god" himself...am I
close?
Your guesses about Bob are as far off the mark as the rest of your
lolly
licker agenda. You haven't answered a simple question and apparently
won't. All you do is dodge and call people names.
Bob
wow...my guesses about bob? Are you Bob Dole? That's the only bob I
know
that called himself by his name instead of "me"...or are you just so
important that you can't be so informal?
Bob is more important than Mr. Dole. If you don't like the writing
style don't read the posts.
Bob
Oh, Damn this is fun! A narcissist with delusions of superiority and
grandeur...
Answer the question.
How does legal recognition of a civil union of (my) rump rider (or lolly
licker) buddies make any
difference (to) the age old institution of marriage?
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
Enjoy that little corner, dude...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 10:53:09 AM |
|
|
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
Enjoy that little corner, dude...
Another non-conversation with a ***** idiot.
-- PLOINK --
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 11:18:15 AM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFEDC75.4030908@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
Enjoy that little corner, dude...
Another non-conversation with a ***** idiot.
-- PLOINK --
And to think you're the one that says name calling is bad. I really hope you
haven't plonked me...you're so fun!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 12:04:46 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFEDC75.4030908@hotmail.com...
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
Enjoy that little corner, dude...
Another non-conversation with a ***** idiot.
-- PLOINK --
I received this via email after bob "ploinked" me...
<message and reply>
No...I want equality under the law. Either legalization of gay marriage and
full recognition under secular law, or removal of state benefits from hetero
marrieds. Either way is fine by me. BTW, I thought you plonked me...;)
hugs-n-kisses
me
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Allan" <boby23456@hotmail.com>
To: <milla@visi.com>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay
Marriage
From: "Amelia M. Samples" <milla@visi.com>
Bob
What "age old" instituion? The one made up by the Catholic Church? The
modern state recognition and granting of benefits to married couples is a
relatively new phenomenon. Try moving into the 20th century.
IOW: You want to replace the age old (much older and wider than the
Catholic Church) institution of marriage with some new rump rider version
of
a government handout program. Sorry toots, that is just another way of
advocating the destruction of the age old tradition of marriage. And your
allusion to the 20the century is out of date in addition to being false
logic.
Bob
_________________________________________________________________
Enjoy a special introductory offer for dial-up Internet access - limited
time only! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
</message and reply>
Fun, ain't it...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 01:01:06 PM |
|
|
Bob wrote:
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
Enjoy that little corner, dude...
Another non-conversation with a ***** idiot.
How come it's all right for you to call people names, and
ask questions?
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = dictator.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 01:04:19 PM |
|
|
"Fritz" <fsmith@22b54clpl.net> wrote in message
news:3FFEFA71.FF688571@22b54clpl.net...
Bob wrote:
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
Enjoy that little corner, dude...
Another non-conversation with a ***** idiot.
How come it's all right for you to call people names, and
ask questions?
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = dictator.
Because he's special, that's why...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Emi M Briet" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 04:24:47 PM |
|
|
In article <TWCLb.2057$LW.1019@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com>,
"Amelia M. Samples" <milla@georgebush.visi.com> wrote:
Because he's special, that's why...
....but we already knew he was 'special'...VERY 'special' ;)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Emi M Briet" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 04:42:05 PM |
|
|
In article <3FFEDC75.4030908@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
wrote:
-- PLOINK --
<Announcer> This is a KBC News special report...from New York, here's
John Maze...
<JM> The Usenet world of alt.politics cheered today as prolific
right-winger-turned-repetitive troll "Bob" gave up on his argument
against gay marriage after numerous requests to prove that allowing gays
to marry destroys the idea of 'marriage'. Live on the scene is Usenet
field reporter Emi Briet.
<EB> Thanks, John. "Bob" recently had been repeating the same question
in Usenet over and over again, either unaware or uncaring about the fact
that the question's given condition of "gay marriage destroys
'marriage'" has not been proven, making the question itself invalid.
After being told of the flaw in the scientific method, and even
knowledge that if phrased differently, his question could be valid, he
decided to just plonk those asking for proof, effectively running away
from the argument. This is a victory for those on the other side of the
argument, John.
<JM> What about the other people arguing against gay marriage? Surely
they still have voice in the newsgroup.
<EB> Yes they do, John, but unlike "Bob" they are putting actual
thought into their posts....but Bob took the argument into a very
repetitive and thoughtless direction which he was refusing to budge on,
and was finally worn out when, by leaving the discussion, he told the
others involved that he had no way to prove his given and refuses to try
to rephrase his question, and is now safely plonkable by the general
populace for the simple reason that...he ran away.
<JM> Well, I for one am glad that this matter is finally closed.
<EB> As am I, John. For KBC News, I'm Emi Briet.
<JM> Thanks, Emi. We will now take you back to your regularly
scheduled programming. We will have more on this subject on tonight's
"KBC Network News" at 6:30, 5:30 central. For KBC News, I'm John Maze.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 04:56:54 PM |
|
|
"Emi M Briet" <emi@emiofbrie.cx> wrote in message
news:emi-90246D.16470809012004@zeus-ge0.rdc-kc.rr.com...
In article <3FFEDC75.4030908@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
wrote:
-- PLOINK --
<Announcer> This is a KBC News special report...from New York, here's
John Maze...
<JM> The Usenet world of alt.politics cheered today as prolific
right-winger-turned-repetitive troll "Bob" gave up on his argument
against gay marriage after numerous requests to prove that allowing gays
to marry destroys the idea of 'marriage'. Live on the scene is Usenet
field reporter Emi Briet.
<EB> Thanks, John. "Bob" recently had been repeating the same question
in Usenet over and over again, either unaware or uncaring about the fact
that the question's given condition of "gay marriage destroys
'marriage'" has not been proven, making the question itself invalid.
After being told of the flaw in the scientific method, and even
knowledge that if phrased differently, his question could be valid, he
decided to just plonk those asking for proof, effectively running away
from the argument. This is a victory for those on the other side of the
argument, John.
<JM> What about the other people arguing against gay marriage? Surely
they still have voice in the newsgroup.
<EB> Yes they do, John, but unlike "Bob" they are putting actual
thought into their posts....but Bob took the argument into a very
repetitive and thoughtless direction which he was refusing to budge on,
and was finally worn out when, by leaving the discussion, he told the
others involved that he had no way to prove his given and refuses to try
to rephrase his question, and is now safely plonkable by the general
populace for the simple reason that...he ran away.
<JM> Well, I for one am glad that this matter is finally closed.
<EB> As am I, John. For KBC News, I'm Emi Briet.
<JM> Thanks, Emi. We will now take you back to your regularly
scheduled programming. We will have more on this subject on tonight's
"KBC Network News" at 6:30, 5:30 central. For KBC News, I'm John Maze.
I guess Bob picked up his balls and went home...;)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 12:55:29 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:53:09 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
Enjoy that little corner, dude...
Another non-conversation with a ***** idiot.
-- PLOINK --
And Bob runs away again. Typical bigoted coward. He's brave and bold
when talking with people who agree with him, but when he's asked to
defend his stupid statements, he runs like a deer.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amelia M. Samples" |
|
| Title: Re: Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage |
09 Jan 2004 01:01:45 PM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:j7utvvo7v8tinb0ei2a21dv562tahu2on9@4ax.com...
Lo, many moons past, on Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:53:09 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
Amelia M. Samples wrote:
Answer the question.
How does destroying the age old institution of marriage make any
difference in your relationship with your rump rider (or lolly licker)
buddies?
Enjoy that little corner, dude...
Another non-conversation with a ***** idiot.
-- PLOINK --
And Bob runs away again. Typical bigoted coward. He's brave and bold
when talking with people who agree with him, but when he's asked to
defend his stupid statements, he runs like a deer.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
Typical dittohead.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | |
