Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage

Religions > Atheism > Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 64 of 110

Topic:	Religions > Atheism
User:	"Randy Jabsco"
Date:	20 Dec 2003 06:55:16 PM
Object:	Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage

Hey faggots, I'm still confused. Help me out here. Didn't you faggots say
that the tide has changed and that EVERYONE is accepting faggots now, and
that only a few minor bigots won't accept? Didn't you say the majority of
people are accepting ***** behavior? I don't understand this article, I am
very confused. Why is it that faggots can only be accepted by imposing
their will on other people and seeking out sypathetic judges to change laws
for them? How come they can't take their case to the 'majority public' in
the voting booths? Surely if EVERYONE is accepting faggots now, they should
EASILY get these laws passed on the ballots!! Why is it that 38 states now
have a consititutional ban on ***** marriages if the majority of the voters
want otherwise? Help me out here...
===
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/21/national/21GAY.html?ex=1073192400&en=a887ec494ccc1c01&ei=5004&partner=UNTD
Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage
The latest New York Times/CBS News poll has found widespread support for an
amendment to the United States Constitution to ban gay marriage. It also
found unease about homosexual relations in general, making the issue a
potentially divisive one for the Democrats and an opportunity for the
Republicans in the 2004 election.
Support for a constitutional amendment extends across a wide swath of the
public and includes a majority of people traditionally viewed as supportive
of gay rights, including Democrats, women and people who live on the East
Coast.
Attitudes on the subject seem to be inextricably linked to how people view
marriage itself. For a majority of Americans - 53 percent - marriage is
largely a religious matter. Seventy-one percent of those people oppose gay
marriage. Similarly, 33 percent of Americans say marriage is largely a legal
matter and a majority of those people - 55 percent - say they support gay
marriage.
The most positive feelings toward gay people were registered among
respondents under 30, and among those who knew gay people.
The nationwide poll found that 55 percent of Americans favored an amendment
to the constitution that would allow marriage only between a man and a
woman, while 40 percent opposed the idea.
The findings come after the highest court in Massachusetts ruled 4 to 3 last
month that same-sex marriage was permissible under the state's Constitution.
That ruling followed a 6-to-3 decision in late June by the United States
Supreme Court striking down antisodomy laws.
President Bush had been noncommittal about a constitutional amendment
immediately after the Massachusetts ruling, with the administration worried
that support for a ban on gay marriage would alienate moderate voters. But
last week Mr. Bush for the first time voiced his support, saying, "I will
support a constitutional amendment which would honor marriage between a man
and a woman, codify that."
The statement signals the White House's increasing confidence that it can
exploit the matter in the presidential campaign, both to energize its
evangelical supporters and to discredit the eventual Democratic nominee.
Most of the Democratic candidates oppose gay marriage but favor civil
unions. Howard Dean, who is leading in the polls for the Democratic
nomination, signed a law when he was governor of Vermont allowing civil
unions, an action that Republicans have already used to portray him as too
liberal for mainstream America.
The court rulings generated extensive publicity and concern, not only about
same-sex marriage but also about having the courts set social agendas that
have not been approved by the legislative process.
"We have found that the more people focus on it, the less they support it,"
said the Rev. Lou Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition,
which strongly opposes gay marriage and is working actively for a
constitutional ban.
The Times/CBS News poll was conducted from Dec. 10 through Dec. 13 in
telephone interviews with 1,057 people. It carries a margin of sampling
error of plus or minus three percentage points. Responses about gay rights
tend to be influenced somewhat by the wording of the questions.
This poll and other surveys show that as the courts have extended legal
rights to gays this year, Americans have become increasingly uncomfortable
with same-sex relations.
For decades, a majority of Americans have not approved of homosexual
relations. That had begun to change, until the Supreme Court ruling in June
and the Massachusetts ruling in November. A New York Times/CBS News poll
conducted in July found that 54 percent of respondents said homosexual
relations should be legal. Only 41 percent of the respondents in the latest
poll said they should be legal.
Richard Waters, 71, a retired elementary school teacher in Little Valley,
N.Y., and a Republican, said in a follow-up interview to the poll that he
strongly supported a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.
.

User: "Throatwarbler Mangrove"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	27 Jan 2004 07:33:33 PM

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:56:42 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <4016A65A.87322177@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:43:28 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <401632BF.A6423784@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:03:09 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <40158E9D.D78FE8A2@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

There must be an echo in here......

You mis-spelled "filthy top-posting ***** pedophile", you filthy
top-posting ***** pedophile.

You're one of those christians, aren't you ?

No, I just don't like child molestors.

Child molestors are worse than christians. You are worse than a
christian.

I am not a child molester.

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?
Perhaps you will become a child molester when it becomes legal to
molest children?
Well, I got bad news for you. It will never be legal to molest
children.
---------------------
Jesus had himself killed because he needed the publicity.
.

User: "Fritz"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	29 Jan 2004 01:20:41 PM

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:56:42 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <4016A65A.87322177@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:43:28 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <401632BF.A6423784@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:03:09 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <40158E9D.D78FE8A2@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

There must be an echo in here......

You mis-spelled "filthy top-posting ***** pedophile", you filthy
top-posting ***** pedophile.

You're one of those christians, aren't you ?

No, I just don't like child molestors.

Child molestors are worse than christians. You are worse than a
christian.

I am not a child molester.

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = dictator.
.

User: "Throatwarbler Mangrove"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	30 Jan 2004 06:03:00 AM

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:20:41 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@bcpl.net> wrote in
message <40195D09.32DDDEC1@bcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:56:42 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <4016A65A.87322177@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:43:28 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <401632BF.A6423784@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:03:09 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@5ae2dbcpl.net> wrote
in message <40158E9D.D78FE8A2@5ae2dbcpl.net>:

There must be an echo in here......

You mis-spelled "filthy top-posting ***** pedophile", you filthy
top-posting ***** pedophile.

You're one of those christians, aren't you ?

No, I just don't like child molestors.

Child molestors are worse than christians. You are worse than a
christian.

I am not a child molester.

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.
I repeat - child molestation will never be legal in any country which
has an advanced western-style culture.
If you want to satisfy your perverted longings, you will have to go to
some dirt-poor 3rd world toilet of a country.
Goodbye. Don't let the door slam into your filthy prolapsed shitter on
your way out...
--
"And stay off the drugs;
they're turning your brain to silly putty."
- John Iser, in _Note To Self_, 31 Mar 2002
"I am an *ex*-pothead - of nearly two years' standing."
- John Iser, mid Jan 2004.
"I'm more of an Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me And My
Monkey sort of person."
- John Iser, late Jan 2004.
See failed pot-smoker John's kooky website, *updated late Jan 2004*,
before he shitcans it completely!
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~jiser/rednex_stalking.html
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	30 Jan 2004 09:10:44 PM

(Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<402a4708.42535898@news.dodo.com.au>:

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:20:41 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@bcpl.net> wrote in
message <40195D09.32DDDEC1@bcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

While I'm here...
[snip]

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.

Oh, you mean where he wrote...
"I see you don't know what NAMBLA is all about, and I'm not here
to defend them. But, it's an organization of gay men loving younger
gay boys. They don't have any interest in molesting straight boys.
But molesting is molesting with whomever, and I'm not so sure it
a good idea."
Message-ID: <3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net>
....which you then 'revised' by deleting the last two sentences. It's
called *selective quotation*, AKA quoting people out of context, Alan,
and I've busted you for it numerous times.
DON'T DO IT. Okay? 'Cos Unka John will thmack your botty for it. (In a
non-molesting sort of way, of course.)
.

User: "Throatwarbler Mangrove"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	30 Jan 2004 10:41:51 PM

[alt.kook.john-iser.koff.scratch.a-choo added.]
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:10:44 +1100, John Iser <be@glebdamned.com>
wrote in message <sh6m10df8coi78j9rm5jcfv6mlnvi6s6sd@4ax.com>:

Raymond_Luxury_Y@tcht.com (Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<402a4708.42535898@news.dodo.com.au>:

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:20:41 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@bcpl.net> wrote in
message <40195D09.32DDDEC1@bcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

While I'm here...
[snip]

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.

Oh, you mean where he wrote...
"I see you don't know what NAMBLA is all about, and I'm not here
to defend them. But, it's an organization of gay men loving younger
gay boys. They don't have any interest in molesting straight boys.
But molesting is molesting with whomever, and I'm not so sure it
a good idea."
Message-ID: <3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net>

...which you then 'revised' by deleting the last two sentences. It's
called *selective quotation*, AKA quoting people out of context, Alan,
and I've busted you for it numerous times.

DON'T DO IT. Okay? 'Cos Unka John will thmack your botty for it. (In a
non-molesting sort of way, of course.)

This is sorta like when you interceded on Peter M*ck*y's behalf when
he said something which many took as being supportive of child
molestation.
Now you think it's OK for Fritz to defend NAMBLA.
Explain yourself, John.
I can only repeat what I said to fritz, ie, child molestation will
never be legal, and will never be "okay", in any advanced culture. So
anyone who wants to indulge in such a thing will have to go to a third
world country.
--
"And stay off the drugs;
they're turning your brain to silly putty."
- John Iser, in _Note To Self_, 31 Mar 2002
"I am an *ex*-pothead - of nearly two years' standing."
- John Iser, mid Jan 2004.
"I'm more of an Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me And My
Monkey sort of person."
- John Iser, late Jan 2004.
See failed pot-smoker John's kooky website, *updated late Jan 2004*,
before he shitcans it completely!
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~jiser/rednex_stalking.html
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	31 Jan 2004 09:43:09 AM

(Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<401b309a.1331955@news.dodo.com.au>:

[alt.kook.john-iser.koff.scratch.a-choo added.]

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:10:44 +1100, John Iser <be@glebdamned.com>
wrote in message <sh6m10df8coi78j9rm5jcfv6mlnvi6s6sd@4ax.com>:

(Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<402a4708.42535898@news.dodo.com.au>:

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:20:41 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@bcpl.net> wrote in
message <40195D09.32DDDEC1@bcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

While I'm here...
[snip]

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.

Oh, you mean where he wrote...
"I see you don't know what NAMBLA is all about, and I'm not here
to defend them. But, it's an organization of gay men loving younger
gay boys. They don't have any interest in molesting straight boys.
But molesting is molesting with whomever, and I'm not so sure it
a good idea."
Message-ID: <3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net>

...which you then 'revised' by deleting the last two sentences. It's
called *selective quotation*, AKA quoting people out of context, Alan,
and I've busted you for it numerous times.

DON'T DO IT. Okay? 'Cos Unka John will thmack your botty for it. (In a
non-molesting sort of way, of course.)

This is sorta like when you interceded on Peter M*ck*y's behalf when
he said something which many took as being supportive of child
molestation.

Now you think it's OK for Fritz to defend NAMBLA.

No, I was commenting on your practice of quoting people out of
context. That is where it begins and ends. Got it?
(How did I *know*, ahead of time, you'd try to pull a diversion like
that? It's because I have this 'power' called Iser's ESP: "Everybody's
So Predictable".)
[snip the insincere hand-on-heart trollery]
.

User: "Throatwarbler Mangrove"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	31 Jan 2004 03:12:10 PM

[alt.kook.john-iser.must.check.labels.on.pillows added.]
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:43:09 +1100, John Iser <john_iser@yahoo.com>
wrote in message <gkin10lv1c3sco44bfl2bh214bn2s22rv9@4ax.com>:
....

I have this 'power' called Iser's ESP:

So how come you can't figure out who's turning your pillows around, as
per your website?
As a matter of interest, how often do you check the labels on your
pillows?
--
"And stay off the drugs;
they're turning your brain to silly putty."
- John Iser, in _Note To Self_, 31 Mar 2002
"I am an *ex*-pothead - of nearly two years' standing."
- John Iser, mid Jan 2004.
"I'm more of an Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me And My
Monkey sort of person."
- John Iser, late Jan 2004.
See failed pot-smoker John's kooky website, *updated late Jan 2004*,
before he shitcans it completely!
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~jiser/rednex_stalking.html
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	01 Feb 2004 06:25:27 AM

(Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<401e1a26.906700@news.dodo.com.au>:

[alt.kook.john-iser.must.check.labels.on.pillows added.]

Can't avoid seeing the ends of my pillows, as they are compressed from
eight years of carrying my heavy head and so slip out of the
pillowcases every day.
But feel free to go on displaying your ignorance. I know you're proud
of it.

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:43:09 +1100, John Iser <john_iser@yahoo.com>
wrote in message <gkin10lv1c3sco44bfl2bh214bn2s22rv9@4ax.com>:

...

I have this 'power' called Iser's ESP:

(Unacknowledged [snip] noted.)
Alan, you are a sad little man.
--
Alan, the Rush Limbaugh of TV criticism:
[Re the Paul Hogan Show, braindead Aussie TV dross of the 1970s:]
"That's a shame, it was a good show. Those were the days before all
the anal-retentive PC do-gooders like you put a stultifying blanket of
"sensitivity" over everything. Can't risk upsetting the Homos or the
Feminags or the Multiculturals, eh? Yes, no more Luigi the
Magnificent, and no more Con the Fruiterer either. "Coupla days,
byooodiful".
<4010aee7.44519947@news.dodo.com.au>, 10 Jan 2004 00:47:36
.

User: "Throatwarbler Mangrove"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	31 Jan 2004 03:02:32 PM

[alt.kook.john-iser.must.check.labels.on.pillows added.]
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:43:09 +1100, John Iser <john_iser@yahoo.com>
wrote in message <gkin10lv1c3sco44bfl2bh214bn2s22rv9@4ax.com>:

Raymond_Luxury_Y@tcht.com (Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<401b309a.1331955@news.dodo.com.au>:

[alt.kook.john-iser.koff.scratch.a-choo added.]

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:10:44 +1100, John Iser <be@glebdamned.com>
wrote in message <sh6m10df8coi78j9rm5jcfv6mlnvi6s6sd@4ax.com>:

Raymond_Luxury_Y@tcht.com (Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<402a4708.42535898@news.dodo.com.au>:

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:20:41 -0500, Fritz <fsmith@bcpl.net> wrote in
message <40195D09.32DDDEC1@bcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

While I'm here...
[snip]

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.

Oh, you mean where he wrote...
"I see you don't know what NAMBLA is all about, and I'm not here
to defend them. But, it's an organization of gay men loving younger
gay boys. They don't have any interest in molesting straight boys.
But molesting is molesting with whomever, and I'm not so sure it
a good idea."
Message-ID: <3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net>

...which you then 'revised' by deleting the last two sentences. It's
called *selective quotation*, AKA quoting people out of context, Alan,
and I've busted you for it numerous times.

DON'T DO IT. Okay? 'Cos Unka John will thmack your botty for it. (In a
non-molesting sort of way, of course.)

This is sorta like when you interceded on Peter M*ck*y's behalf when
he said something which many took as being supportive of child
molestation.

Now you think it's OK for Fritz to defend NAMBLA.

No,

So why defend him then?
--
"And stay off the drugs;
they're turning your brain to silly putty."
- John Iser, in _Note To Self_, 31 Mar 2002
"I am an *ex*-pothead - of nearly two years' standing."
- John Iser, mid Jan 2004.
"I'm more of an Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me And My
Monkey sort of person."
- John Iser, late Jan 2004.
See failed pot-smoker John's kooky website, *updated late Jan 2004*,
before he shitcans it completely!
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~jiser/rednex_stalking.html
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	01 Feb 2004 06:25:26 AM

(Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<401c183e.418482@news.dodo.com.au>:

[alt.kook.john-iser.must.check.labels.on.pillows added.]

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:43:09 +1100, John Iser <john_iser@yahoo.com>
wrote in message <gkin10lv1c3sco44bfl2bh214bn2s22rv9@4ax.com>:

[snip]

No,

So why defend him then?

(Unacknowledged [snip] noted.)
Alan, you are a sad little man.
--
Alan (Throatgobbler) the Charm School failure:
"I love the way you constantly beg me to kick you and ***** on
your stupid ugly face."
<401bc1de.3987823@news.dodo.com.au>, 27 Jan 2004
.

User: "Fritz"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	31 Jan 2004 11:15:44 PM

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.

Oh, you mean where he wrote...
"I see you don't know what NAMBLA is all about, and I'm not here
to defend them. But, it's an organization of gay men loving younger
gay boys. They don't have any interest in molesting straight boys.
But molesting is molesting with whomever, and I'm not so sure it
a good idea."
Message-ID: <3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net>

...which you then 'revised' by deleting the last two sentences. It's
called *selective quotation*, AKA quoting people out of context, Alan,
and I've busted you for it numerous times.

DON'T DO IT. Okay? 'Cos Unka John will thmack your botty for it. (In a
non-molesting sort of way, of course.)

This is sorta like when you interceded on Peter M*ck*y's behalf when
he said something which many took as being supportive of child
molestation.

Now you think it's OK for Fritz to defend NAMBLA.

You are a liar.
Again I ask for proof.
I already know you can't provide it, it's so much fun outing
you, as a liar and a mouth with no brain.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = dictator.
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	01 Feb 2004 06:25:28 AM

Fritz <fsmith@1sibm11bcpl.net> wrote in message
<401C8B80.E157E5@1sibm11bcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

[snip]

Now you think it's OK for Fritz to defend NAMBLA.

You are a liar.

No, he's a troll. Save your breath, keyboard strokes and bandwidth.
--
Alan (Throatgobbler) the self-confessed troll:
"Thanks for all the laughs, John. I hope you enjoy being trolled as
much as I enjoy trolling you."
<4013b0ae.44975053@news.dodo.com.au>, 10 Jan 2004
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	30 Jan 2004 08:55:34 PM

(Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<402a4708.42535898@news.dodo.com.au>:
Umm Alan... I think that .sig was intended for <koff> someone else.
Goose.
<scratches neck>
.

User: "Throatwarbler Mangrove"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	30 Jan 2004 10:45:24 PM

[alt.kook.john-iser.koff.scratch.a-choo added.]
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:55:34 +1100, John Iser <be@glebdamned.com>
wrote in message <s56m10l6uq10gsfhfhonbbcorfv583svio@4ax.com>:

Raymond_Luxury_Y@tcht.com (Throatwarbler Mangrove) wrote in message
<402a4708.42535898@news.dodo.com.au>:

Umm Alan... I think that .sig was intended for <koff> someone else.

I think it may have reached its target.

Goose.

Honk if you think John Iser is a kook.
Honk.

--
"And stay off the drugs;
they're turning your brain to silly putty."
- John Iser, in _Note To Self_, 31 Mar 2002
"I am an *ex*-pothead - of nearly two years' standing."
- John Iser, mid Jan 2004.
"I'm more of an Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me And My
Monkey sort of person."
- John Iser, late Jan 2004.
See failed pot-smoker John's kooky website, *updated late Jan 2004*,
before he shitcans it completely!
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~jiser/rednex_stalking.html
.

User: "Fritz"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	31 Jan 2004 11:09:24 PM

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

You mis-spelled "filthy top-posting ***** pedophile", you filthy
top-posting ***** pedophile.

You're one of those christians, aren't you ?

No, I just don't like child molestors.

Child molestors are worse than christians. You are worse than a
christian.

I am not a child molester.

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.

What would I look for, at least give me a clue.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = dictator.
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	01 Feb 2004 06:25:31 AM

Fritz <fsmith@1sibm11bcpl.net> wrote in message
<401C8A03.BF02B205@1sibm11bcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

You mis-spelled "filthy top-posting ***** pedophile", you filthy
top-posting ***** pedophile.

You're one of those christians, aren't you ?

No, I just don't like child molestors.

Child molestors are worse than christians. You are worse than a
christian.

I am not a child molester.

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.

What would I look for, at least give me a clue.

Go to http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en and paste
<3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net> into the 'message ID' field.
Hint: he was quoting you slightly out of context. There are four
sentences in the paragraph of yours Alan (sorry, Throatgobbler) is
referring to, and he only quoted the first two.
That said, you should put up another post in this thread and actively
disassociate yourself from any implied approval of NAMBLA. Even if
they are promoting consensual relationships betwen older and younger
gays, they are still encouraging the manipulation of young gays by
older ones.
Dunno about you, but that sort of thing creeps me out badly.
.

User: "Fritz"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	01 Feb 2004 01:58:00 PM

John Iser wrote:

Fritz <fsmith@1sibm11bcpl.net> wrote in message
<401C8A03.BF02B205@1sibm11bcpl.net>:

Throatwarbler Mangrove wrote:

You mis-spelled "filthy top-posting ***** pedophile", you filthy
top-posting ***** pedophile.

You're one of those christians, aren't you ?

No, I just don't like child molestors.

Child molestors are worse than christians. You are worse than a
christian.

I am not a child molester.

If you're not a child molester, then why do you promote an
organization that wants to legalize child molestation?

Show me where I promoted anything of the kind.

I showed you. You google it.

What would I look for, at least give me a clue.

Go to http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en and paste
<3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net> into the 'message ID' field.

Hint: he was quoting you slightly out of context. There are four
sentences in the paragraph of yours Alan (sorry, Throatgobbler) is
referring to, and he only quoted the first two.

That said, you should put up another post in this thread and actively
disassociate yourself from any implied approval of NAMBLA. Even if
they are promoting consensual relationships betwen older and younger
gays, they are still encouraging the manipulation of young gays by
older ones.

Dunno about you, but that sort of thing creeps me out badly.

I believe I already said that in the statement you referred too.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = dictator.
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	01 Feb 2004 11:33:26 PM

Fritz <fsmith@1sibm11bcpl.net> wrote in message
<401D5A48.EF50960F@1sibm11bcpl.net>:

John Iser wrote:

[snip]

Go to http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en and paste
<3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net> into the 'message ID' field.

Hint: he was quoting you slightly out of context. There are four
sentences in the paragraph of yours Alan (sorry, Throatgobbler) is
referring to, and he only quoted the first two.

That said, you should put up another post in this thread and actively
disassociate yourself from any implied approval of NAMBLA. Even if
they are promoting consensual relationships betwen older and younger
gays, they are still encouraging the manipulation of young gays by
older ones.

Dunno about you, but that sort of thing creeps me out badly.

I believe I already said that in the statement you referred too.

You did, for my money, but I still think "...I'm not so sure
[molesting is] a good idea." should be upgraded to "...I'm 100% sure
[molesting is] a bad idea."
Just to keep trollo-literalists like Alan (Throatgobbler) happy, you
understand. Otherwise, they just come back making mountains out of
molehills and wasting valuable time and bandwidth indefinitely.
.

User: "Fritz"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	03 Feb 2004 03:07:51 AM

John Iser wrote:

Fritz <fsmith@1sibm11bcpl.net> wrote in message
<401D5A48.EF50960F@1sibm11bcpl.net>:

John Iser wrote:

[snip]

Go to http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en and paste
<3F8D8BA0.7CD9471E@bcfjeupl.net> into the 'message ID' field.

Hint: he was quoting you slightly out of context. There are four
sentences in the paragraph of yours Alan (sorry, Throatgobbler) is
referring to, and he only quoted the first two.

That said, you should put up another post in this thread and actively
disassociate yourself from any implied approval of NAMBLA. Even if
they are promoting consensual relationships betwen older and younger
gays, they are still encouraging the manipulation of young gays by
older ones.

Dunno about you, but that sort of thing creeps me out badly.

I believe I already said that in the statement you referred too.

You did, for my money, but I still think "...I'm not so sure
[molesting is] a good idea." should be upgraded to "...I'm 100% sure
[molesting is] a bad idea."

Just to keep trollo-literalists like Alan (Throatgobbler) happy, you
understand. Otherwise, they just come back making mountains out of
molehills and wasting valuable time and bandwidth indefinitely.

I thank you for your advice, but I don't consider it my job to
keep the morons "happy". Besides, that's an impossible
task to begin with.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = dictator.
.

User: "John Iser"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	03 Feb 2004 05:13:34 PM

Fritz <fsmith@1sib22qmvim11bcnytpl.net> wrote in message
<401F64E6.17FC7D76@1sib22qmvim11bcnytpl.net>:

John Iser wrote:

Fritz <fsmith@1sibm11bcpl.net> wrote in message
<401D5A48.EF50960F@1sibm11bcpl.net>:

[snip]

I believe I already said that in the statement you referred too.

You did, for my money, but I still think "...I'm not so sure
[molesting is] a good idea." should be upgraded to "...I'm 100% sure
[molesting is] a bad idea."

Just to keep trollo-literalists like Alan (Throatgobbler) happy, you
understand. Otherwise, they just come back making mountains out of
molehills and wasting valuable time and bandwidth indefinitely.

I thank you for your advice, but I don't consider it my job to
keep the morons "happy". Besides, that's an impossible
task to begin with.

Well put. Thank you for your replies, and I'll leave it there.
You can bet Alan (Throatgobbler) won't, though. My advice: bozo-bin
him. He's just trolling for attention, AFAICT.
.

User: "Throatwarbler Mangrove"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	04 Feb 2004 05:24:10 AM

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 10:13:34 +1100, John Iser
<looking@theworldthroughawindshield.com> wrote in message
<iga020h6skleql76mpirejf3hols6lh9mo@4ax.com>:

Fritz <fsmith@1sib22qmvim11bcnytpl.net> wrote in message
<401F64E6.17FC7D76@1sib22qmvim11bcnytpl.net>:

John Iser wrote:

Fritz <fsmith@1sibm11bcpl.net> wrote in message
<401D5A48.EF50960F@1sibm11bcpl.net>:

[snip]

I believe I already said that in the statement you referred too.

You did, for my money, but I still think "...I'm not so sure
[molesting is] a good idea." should be upgraded to "...I'm 100% sure
[molesting is] a bad idea."

He won't say it, John. He supports NAMBLA, and that's all there is to
it.

Just to keep trollo-literalists like Alan (Throatgobbler) happy, you
understand. Otherwise, they just come back making mountains out of
molehills and wasting valuable time and bandwidth indefinitely.

NAMBLA is an organization of dirty old men that want to sodomize young
boys as young as eight years old, John. In short, they want to make
child rape legal.

I thank you for your advice, but I don't consider it my job to
keep the morons "happy". Besides, that's an impossible
task to begin with.

Well put. Thank you for your replies, and I'll leave it there.

You're showing a very laid-back approach to child abuse yet again,
John. Seems to be sort of a pattern with you, doesn't it?

You can bet Alan (Throatgobbler) won't, though.

Well, if you mean that I don't condone child abuse, John, then you're
right. And what's more, all decent people agree with my stance on
that. You'll just have to accept that you and Fritz are in the tiny
minority.

My advice: bozo-bin
him. He's just trolling for attention, AFAICT.

Do you truly regret making the decision not to report the child abuse
happening next door to you, John? You claim that you regret having
decided to keep quiet about it, but your statements here would seem to
say otherwise.
--
Jesus had himself killed because he needed the publicity.
.

User: "Fritz"
Title: Re: "Fritz"	05 Feb 2004 01:20:31 PM