Religions > Atheism > "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman For Having a Child With Her Husband
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
25 Dec 2007 11:55:42 PM |
| Object: |
"Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman For Having a Child With Her Husband |
Aren't these "family value" Repubilcans too busy passing love letters
in men's bathrooms to care?
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/25/kirsten-gillibrand-getting-heat-for-getting-pregnant/
First term Congresswoman Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY20), in a
highly-vulnerable district in New York’s Hudson Valley, is being
attacked, not for her politics, not for her stand against the Iraq
war, not for the earmarks she’s bringing home including money for
rural broadband development.
Nope…
She’s being attacked because she and her husband have conceived a
child.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
"FRED STONE YOU GOT PWNED. "
-laleeloolelo <at> yahoo, 12/28/2007
"Face it, Fred, you've been pwn3d."
-Bill Baker, 12/21/2007
.
|
|
| User: "•R. L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman For Having a Child With Her Husband |
26 Dec 2007 04:27:15 AM |
|
|
In article <44r3n3tjjp4mdsd3kc4771u0ttmluau8gu@4ax.com>, "Yang, AthD
(h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Aren't these "family value" Repubilcans too busy passing love letters
in men's bathrooms to care?
• chortle.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/25/kirsten-gillibrand-getting-heat-for-getting-pregnant/
First term Congresswoman Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY20), in a
highly-vulnerable district in New York’s Hudson Valley, is being
attacked, not for her politics, not for her stand against the Iraq
war, not for the earmarks she’s bringing home including money for
rural broadband development.
Nope…
She’s being attacked because she and her husband have conceived a
child.
--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman ForHaving a Child With Her Husband |
26 Dec 2007 06:08:13 AM |
|
|
On 26 dec, 06:55, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Aren't these "family value" Repubilcans too busy passing love letters
in men's bathrooms to care?
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/25/kirsten-gillibrand-getting-h...
First term Congresswoman Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY20), in a
highly-vulnerable district in New York's Hudson Valley, is being
attacked, not for her politics, not for her stand against the Iraq
war, not for the earmarks she's bringing home including money for
rural broadband development.
Nope...
She's being attacked because she and her husband have conceived a
child.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
"FRED STONE YOU GOT PWNED. "
-laleeloolelo <at> yahoo, 12/28/2007
"Face it, Fred, you've been pwn3d."
-Bill Baker, 12/21/2007
Although there is nothing irrational about discussing the efectiveness
at the job of a pregnant woman, it is quite funny the way you desribe
it.
Personally I am OK with it, but wait till she starts breast-feeding
the baby in the house! Than you will really have the republicans
protesting the family!
(I do hope she is going to do that!)
Peter van Velzen
December 2007
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
PS can't reply at alt.rush.limbaugh
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman For Having a Child With Her Husband |
26 Dec 2007 04:57:11 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 04:08:13 -0800 (PST), in alt.abortion,
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote:
On 26 dec, 06:55, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Aren't these "family value" Repubilcans too busy passing love letters
in men's bathrooms to care?
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/25/kirsten-gillibrand-getting-h...
First term Congresswoman Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY20), in a
highly-vulnerable district in New York's Hudson Valley, is being
attacked, not for her politics, not for her stand against the Iraq
war, not for the earmarks she's bringing home including money for
rural broadband development.
Nope...
She's being attacked because she and her husband have conceived a
child.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
"FRED STONE YOU GOT PWNED. "
-laleeloolelo <at> yahoo, 12/28/2007
"Face it, Fred, you've been pwn3d."
-Bill Baker, 12/21/2007
Although there is nothing irrational about discussing the efectiveness
at the job of a pregnant woman, it is quite funny the way you desribe
it.
Personally I am OK with it, but wait till she starts breast-feeding
the baby in the house! Than you will really have the republicans
protesting the family!
(I do hope she is going to do that!)
So Do I. Breast feed is natural.
I would suggest a donation of 100Bucks for her re-election.
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BobR" |
|
| Title: Re: "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman ForHaving a Child With Her Husband |
26 Dec 2007 09:07:52 AM |
|
|
On Dec 25, 11:55 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Aren't these "family value" Repubilcans too busy passing love letters
in men's bathrooms to care?
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/25/kirsten-gillibrand-getting-h...
First term Congresswoman Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY20), in a
highly-vulnerable district in New York's Hudson Valley, is being
attacked, not for her politics, not for her stand against the Iraq
war, not for the earmarks she's bringing home including money for
rural broadband development.
Nope...
She's being attacked because she and her husband have conceived a
child.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
"FRED STONE YOU GOT PWNED. "
-laleeloolelo <at> yahoo, 12/28/2007
"Face it, Fred, you've been pwn3d."
-Bill Baker, 12/21/2007
How strange, read the entire thing twice and can't find a single
reference to Republican in the story. A single moronic idiot without
any reference to party shows their stupidity and you have to add to
that stupidity by the *****-U-mption that it represents the Republican
view. Shows that you are just as dumb as the moron who wrote the
letter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kenny McCormack" |
|
| Title: Re: "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman ForHaving a Child With Her Husband |
26 Dec 2007 09:36:02 AM |
|
|
In article <cb0fc957-3607-4337-91f1-ad52d9051c27@l6g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
BobR <reed1@r-a-reed-assoc.com> wrote:
....
How strange, read the entire thing twice and can't find a single
reference to Republican in the story. A single moronic idiot without
any reference to party shows their stupidity and you have to add to
that stupidity by the *****-U-mption that it represents the Republican
view. Shows that you are just as dumb as the moron who wrote the
letter.
While it is not a certainty that when you hear something stupid from
someone in Congress, it was said by a Republican, it is certainly the
way to bet.
And, the more stupid it is, the better the bet becomes.
Note that there's not really anything untoward here. It is well
understood that Republicans come from, and represent, the stupid people in
the stupid states (aka, "Red States"). And there is nothing immoral
about being stupid. It is a natural condition.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BobR" |
|
| Title: Re: "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman ForHaving a Child With Her Husband |
26 Dec 2007 02:57:24 PM |
|
|
On Dec 26, 9:36=A0am, (Kenny McCormack)
wrote:
In article <cb0fc957-3607-4337-91f1-ad52d9051...@l6g2000prm.googlegroups.c=
om>,BobR =A0<re...@r-a-reed-assoc.com> wrote:
...
How strange, read the entire thing twice and can't find a single
reference to Republican in the story. =A0A single moronic idiot without
any reference to party shows their stupidity and you have to add to
that stupidity by the *****-U-mption that it represents the Republican
view. =A0Shows that you are just as dumb as the moron who wrote the
letter.
While it is not a certainty that when you hear something stupid from
someone in Congress, it was said by a Republican, it is certainly the
way to bet.
And, the more stupid it is, the better the bet becomes.
Note that there's not really anything untoward here. =A0It is well
understood that Republicans come from, and represent, the stupid people in=
the stupid states (aka, "Red States"). =A0And there is nothing immoral
about being stupid. =A0It is a natural condition.
The letter wasn't from someone in Congress and your *****-U-mptions tell
much about you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gwyne=F0_Bennetdottir?=" |
|
| Title: Re: "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman ForHaving a Child With Her Husband |
26 Dec 2007 04:54:36 AM |
|
|
On Dec 25, 11:55 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Aren't these "family value" Repubilcans too busy passing love letters
in men's bathrooms to care?
There you go...
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/25/kirsten-gillibrand-getting-h...
First term Congresswoman Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY20), in a
highly-vulnerable district in New York's Hudson Valley, is being
attacked, not for her politics, not for her stand against the Iraq
war, not for the earmarks she's bringing home including money for
rural broadband development.
Nope...
She's being attacked because she and her husband have conceived a
child.
....and she's keeping it! If she elected to have an abortion, she'd
have been crucified.
What a bunch of *****-sucking (in every sense) fucking losers.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
"FRED STONE YOU GOT PWNED. "
-laleeloolelo <at> yahoo, 12/28/2007
"Face it, Fred, you've been pwn3d."
-Bill Baker, 12/21/2007
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: "Family Value" Republicans Angry at Democrat Congresswoman ForHaving a Child With Her Husband |
26 Dec 2007 06:37:35 AM |
|
|
Gwyneð Bennetdottir wrote:
On Dec 25, 11:55 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Aren't these "family value" Repubilcans too busy passing love letters
in men's bathrooms to care?
There you go...
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/25/kirsten-gillibrand-getting-h...
First term Congresswoman Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY20), in a
highly-vulnerable district in New York's Hudson Valley, is being
attacked, not for her politics, not for her stand against the Iraq
war, not for the earmarks she's bringing home including money for
rural broadband development.
Nope...
She's being attacked because she and her husband have conceived a
child.
...and she's keeping it! If she elected to have an abortion, she'd
have been crucified.
Well, see, that's the thing. A female Democrat can never do a thing
right. If a Democratic politician becomes pregnant, she's "wasting
taxpayer money". If she has an abortion, she "murdered a baby".
The misogyny of the stupid-class (mainly the religious*, but also some
atheists) in the Republican party knows no bounds.
* Just so I'm not misconstrued. I'm not saying all religious in the
Republican party are members of the stupid-class, just that the majority
of the stupid-class in the Republican party are religious. :-)
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act *
* of the whole American people which declared that *
* their legislature should make no law respecting *
* an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the *
* free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of *
* separation between church and state." *
* --Thomas Jefferson, 1802 *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
