| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
20 Dec 2005 11:05:30 PM |
| Object: |
F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
21 Dec 2005 08:09:15 AM |
|
|
In <b5-dnUQir88IfzXenZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com>, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous people - Bush, Cheney,
Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft and Rice? And, why weren't they watching
Abramov and Delay?
'Cause they're made men of course!
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We need everything you've got"
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R2726554C
Forgotten Already
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H1233272C
Feds are treating Louisiana like enemy
"...it may be that they may have written us off."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?O21E51C1C
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
21 Dec 2005 01:13:50 AM |
|
|
In article <b5-dnUQir88IfzXenZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
Like the Mafia, they don't rat on their own. I really hope that they
caught those horrible Vegans.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 04:16:06 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:13:50 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
In article <b5-dnUQir88IfzXenZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
Like the Mafia, they don't rat on their own. I really hope that they
caught those horrible Vegans.
My eyes read that as Vogons.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wunderkind" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 06:56:59 PM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:13:50 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
In article <b5-dnUQir88IfzXenZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
Like the Mafia, they don't rat on their own. I really hope that they
caught those horrible Vegans.
My eyes read that as Vogons.
Don't Panic!
WK
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
23 Dec 2005 09:50:43 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:56:59 GMT, Wunderkind <a@b.com> wrote:
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:13:50 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
In article <b5-dnUQir88IfzXenZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
Like the Mafia, they don't rat on their own. I really hope that they
caught those horrible Vegans.
My eyes read that as Vogons.
Don't Panic!
I sure hope he's got his towel!
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
21 Dec 2005 09:17:16 AM |
|
|
Michelle Malkin wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
Because *everyone* knows that the biggest threats to American national
security are gays, Quakers and the pinko commies who don't like the
military recruiting in high schools!
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[W]e have never held that moral disapproval, without any other asserted
state interest, is a sufficient rationale under the Equal Protection
Clause to justify a law that discriminates among groups of persons."
- Sandra Day O`Conner, _Lawrence v Texas_
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=02-102
.
|
|
|
| User: "skyeyes" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 05:58:42 PM |
|
|
Gregory Gadow wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
Abramov and Delay?
Because *everyone* knows that the biggest threats to American national
security are gays, Quakers and the pinko commies who don't like the
military recruiting in high schools!
Yup, 'specially them Quakers. Viscious lot, The Society of Friends.
;->
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
23 Dec 2005 09:51:18 AM |
|
|
On 22 Dec 2005 15:58:42 -0800, "skyeyes" <skyeyes@dakotacom.net>
wrote:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
Abramov and Delay?
Because *everyone* knows that the biggest threats to American national
security are gays, Quakers and the pinko commies who don't like the
military recruiting in high schools!
Yup, 'specially them Quakers. Viscious lot, The Society of Friends.
;->
Nixon was just that.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 01:47:55 AM |
|
|
In article <43A971FC.ADF44E6B@serv.net>,
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
Because *everyone* knows that the biggest threats to American national
security are gays, Quakers and the pinko commies who don't like the
military recruiting in high schools!
And don't forget the Vegans:
http://www.buzzflash.com/peyser/05/12/pey05357.html
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[W]e have never held that moral disapproval, without any other asserted
state interest, is a sufficient rationale under the Equal Protection
Clause to justify a law that discriminates among groups of persons."
- Sandra Day O`Conner, _Lawrence v Texas_
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=02-102
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ken" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 05:53:34 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:47:55 -0800, johac wrote:
And don't forget the Vegans:
http://www.buzzflash.com/peyser/05/12/pey05357.html
I tried going vegan, a couple of times. I just couldn't give up the
cheese.
Saved me from hours of needless interrogation. Thanks Wisconsin!
--
Ken
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
23 Dec 2005 12:57:00 AM |
|
|
In article <pan.2005.12.22.23.53.33.946670@volkswagon>,
Ken <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:47:55 -0800, johac wrote:
And don't forget the Vegans:
http://www.buzzflash.com/peyser/05/12/pey05357.html
I tried going vegan, a couple of times. I just couldn't give up the
cheese.
Saved me from hours of needless interrogation. Thanks Wisconsin!
I went vegan for a while, but became bored with the diet. I still cook
veggie meals occasionally so I guess that makes me a potential sleeper
vegan terrorist.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
21 Dec 2005 10:44:12 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:05:30 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
That could get them killed. There's little danger of the other groups
shooting back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
December 20, 2005
F.B.I. Watched Activist Groups, New Files Show
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
WASHINGTON, Dec. 19 - Counterterrorism agents at the Federal Bureau of
Investigation have conducted numerous surveillance and
intelligence-gathering operations that involved, at least indirectly,
groups active in causes as diverse as the environment, animal cruelty
and poverty relief, newly disclosed agency records show.
F.B.I. officials said Monday that their investigators had no interest
in monitoring political or social activities and that any
investigations that touched on advocacy groups were driven by evidence
of criminal or violent activity at public protests and in other
settings.
After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, John Ashcroft, who was then
attorney general, loosened restrictions on the F.B.I.'s investigative
powers, giving the bureau greater ability to visit and monitor Web
sites, mosques and other public entities in developing terrorism
leads. The bureau has used that authority to investigate not only
groups with suspected ties to foreign terrorists, but also protest
groups suspected of having links to violent or disruptive activities.
But the documents, coming after the Bush administration's confirmation
that President Bush had authorized some spying without warrants in
fighting terrorism, prompted charges from civil rights advocates that
the government had improperly blurred the line between terrorism and
acts of civil disobedience and lawful protest.
One F.B.I. document indicates that agents in Indianapolis planned to
conduct surveillance as part of a "Vegan Community Project." Another
document talks of the Catholic Workers group's "semi-communistic
ideology." A third indicates the bureau's interest in determining the
location of a protest over llama fur planned by People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals.
The documents, provided to The New York Times over the past week, came
as part of a series of Freedom of Information Act lawsuits brought by
the American Civil Liberties Union. For more than a year, the A.C.L.U.
has been seeking access to information in F.B.I. files on about 150
protest and social groups that it says may have been improperly
monitored.
The F.B.I. had previously turned over a small number of documents on
antiwar groups, showing the agency's interest in investigating
possible anarchist or violent links in connection with antiwar
protests and demonstrations in advance of the 2004 political
conventions. And earlier this month, the A.C.L.U.'s Colorado chapter
released similar documents involving, among other things, people
protesting logging practices at a lumber industry gathering in 2002.
The latest batch of documents, parts of which the A.C.L.U. plans to
release publicly on Tuesday, totals more than 2,300 pages and centers
on references in internal files to a handful of groups, including
PETA, the environmental group Greenpeace and the Catholic Workers
group, which promotes antipoverty efforts and social causes.
Many of the investigative documents turned over by the bureau are
heavily edited, making it difficult or impossible to determine the
full context of the references and why the F.B.I. may have been
discussing events like a PETA protest. F.B.I. officials say many of
the references may be much more benign than they seem to civil rights
advocates, adding that the documents offer an incomplete and sometimes
misleading snapshot of the bureau's activities.
"Just being referenced in an F.B.I. file is not tantamount to being
the subject of an investigation," said John Miller, a spokesman for
the bureau.
"The F.B.I. does not target individuals or organizations for
investigation based on their political beliefs," Mr. Miller said.
"Everything we do is carefully promulgated by federal law, Justice
Department guidelines and the F.B.I.'s own rules."
A.C.L.U officials said the latest batch of documents released by the
F.B.I. indicated the agency's interest in a broader array of activist
and protest groups than they had previously thought. In light of other
recent disclosures about domestic surveillance activities by the
National Security Agency and military intelligence units, the A.C.L.U.
said the documents reflected a pattern of overreaching by the Bush
administration.
"It's clear that this administration has engaged every possible
agency, from the Pentagon to N.S.A. to the F.B.I., to engage in spying
on Americans," said Ann Beeson, associate legal director for the
A.C.L.U.
"You look at these documents," Ms. Beeson said, "and you think, wow,
we have really returned to the days of J. Edgar Hoover, when you see
in F.B.I. files that they're talking about a group like the Catholic
Workers league as having a communist ideology."
The documents indicate that in some cases, the F.B.I. has used
employees, interns and other confidential informants within groups
like PETA and Greenpeace to develop leads on potential criminal
activity and has downloaded material from the groups' Web sites, in
addition to monitoring their protests.
In the case of Greenpeace, which is known for highly publicized acts
of civil disobedience like the boarding of cargo ships to unfurl
protest banners, the files indicate that the F.B.I. investigated
possible financial ties between its members and militant groups like
the Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front.
These networks, which have no declared leaders and are only loosely
organized, have been described by the F.B.I. in Congressional
testimony as "extremist special interest groups" whose cells engage in
violent or other illegal acts, making them "a serious domestic
terrorist threat."
In testimony last year, John E. Lewis, deputy assistant director of
the counterterrorism division, said the F.B.I. estimated that in the
past 10 years such groups had engaged in more than 1,000 criminal acts
causing more than $100 million in damage.
When the F.B.I. investigates evidence of possible violence or criminal
disruptions at protests and other events, those investigations are
routinely handled by agents within the bureau's counterterrorism
division.
But the groups mentioned in the newly disclosed F.B.I. files
questioned both the propriety of characterizing such investigations as
related to "terrorism" and the necessity of diverting counterterrorism
personnel from more pressing investigations.
"The fact that we're even mentioned in the F.B.I. files in connection
with terrorism is really troubling," said Tom Wetterer, general
counsel for Greenpeace. "There's no property damage or physical injury
caused in our activities, and under any definition of terrorism, we'd
take issue with that."
Jeff Kerr, general counsel for PETA, rejected the suggestion in some
F.B.I. files that the animal rights group had financial ties to
militant groups, and said he, too, was troubled by his group's
inclusion in the files.
"It's shocking and it's outrageous," Mr. Kerr said. "And to me, it's
an abuse of power by the F.B.I. when groups like Greenpeace and PETA
are basically being punished for their social activism."
Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
21 Dec 2005 07:43:29 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:44:12 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:05:30 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
That could get them killed. There's little danger of the other groups
shooting back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
I think the most telling fact is that there hasn't been any mention of
surveillance of anti-abortion groups despite the history of terrorism
in that movement.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 01:43:28 AM |
|
|
In article <o21kq1pqd2csi7sgosjrghn68ip53ou94m@4ax.com>,
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:44:12 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:05:30 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
That could get them killed. There's little danger of the other groups
shooting back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
I think the most telling fact is that there hasn't been any mention of
surveillance of anti-abortion groups despite the history of terrorism
in that movement.
They probably call them 'Freedom Fighters'.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 08:38:43 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:43:29 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org>
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:44:12 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:05:30 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
That could get them killed. There's little danger of the other groups
shooting back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
I think the most telling fact is that there hasn't been any mention of
surveillance of anti-abortion groups despite the history of terrorism
in that movement.
BushCo supports Christian terrorism.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 04:16:31 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:43:29 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org>
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:44:12 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:05:30 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
That could get them killed. There's little danger of the other groups
shooting back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
I think the most telling fact is that there hasn't been any mention of
surveillance of anti-abortion groups despite the history of terrorism
in that movement.
Christian terrorists are different.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
23 Dec 2005 09:51:46 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:16:31 +0000, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:43:29 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org>
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:44:12 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:05:30 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
That could get them killed. There's little danger of the other groups
shooting back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
I think the most telling fact is that there hasn't been any mention of
surveillance of anti-abortion groups despite the history of terrorism
in that movement.
Christian terrorists are different.
They're the *reich* kind of terrorist.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wunderkind" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
22 Dec 2005 06:56:17 PM |
|
|
satyr wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:44:12 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:05:30 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
That could get them killed. There's little danger of the other groups
shooting back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
I think the most telling fact is that there hasn't been any mention of
surveillance of anti-abortion groups despite the history of terrorism
in that movement.
What do you expect with the Christofascists in power?
WK
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: F.B.I. Watched Activust groups Not the Real Crooks |
21 Dec 2005 07:11:07 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:05:30 -0500, Michelle Malkin wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html
Why doesn't the FBI watch the really dangerous
people - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft
and Rice? And, why weren't they watching Abramov
and Delay?
"Keep your friends close; keep your enemies even closer."
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
