| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
25 Mar 2006 11:12:52 PM |
| Object: |
Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
God bless them!!
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbccentral/content/local_news/epaper/2006/03/25/m1a_Church_0325.html
Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect
WEST PALM BEACH - For two months, they spent their nights as volunteer
security guards in their burglary-plagued house of God.
The vigilance paid off early Friday when a suspected burglar broke through a
window and encountered a half-dozen church members wielding baseball bats
and broom handles.
When police arrived, at about 1 a.m., they found the man battered and bound
with rope on the roof outside a second-story window of the Church of the
Nazarene in northern West Palm Beach.
"We think it was the same burglar who broke in two months ago. He used the
same window," said Aristeo Paxtor, 31, who was the first to confront the
suspect.
The action began around 12:50 a.m. when the makeshift guards, waiting in the
dark, heard the pattering of footsteps on the roof. They then heard a window
break, and one dialed 911.
Paxtor was the first to make contact, swinging a bat at the suspect as he
opened a door, striking him across the chest and sending him reeling
backward.
By then, volunteer guard Esteban Mendoza had made his way to the roof and
was waiting for the suspect to scramble out the same window he entered. When
he was halfway out the window, Mendoza hit him in the back with a bat,
according to police reports.
Using rope purchased just for this occasion, the volunteers tied him up and
waited for police to arrive.
"We were simply defending ourselves and our church," said Juan Delfin, 26,
one of the volunteers. "The police can't be everywhere."
--
----------------
" The truth shall set you free "
.
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 11:19:13 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:29:13 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Yo
Ok, bored now.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 12:04:04 PM |
|
|
As viewed from alt.california, Bonnie ***** wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:29:13 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Yo
Ok, bored now.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
This is not a cite from the current, mainstream, peer-reviewed,
scientific literature which supports your constant assertions.
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 12:16:04 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:04:04 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Jafo
<a@nospam.invalid>
As viewed from alt.california, Bonnie ***** wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:29:13 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Yo
Ok, bored now.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
This is not a cite from the current, mainstream, peer-reviewed,
scientific literature which supports your constant assertions.
Nice one!
Now go suck your boyfriend Stain's ***** and shut the ***** up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 12:32:27 PM |
|
|
As viewed from alt.california, Bonnie ***** wrote:
Yo
Ok, bored now.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
This is not a cite from the current, mainstream, peer-reviewed,
scientific literature which supports your constant assertions.
Nice one!
Yeah, I read it somewhere.
Now go suck your boyfriend Stain's *****
And kick you aside? No, you just keep going; you're doing fine.
and shut the ***** up.
And how do you propose to make that happen, Bonnie?
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 01:22:43 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:32:27 -0800, Jafo <a@nospam.invalid> wrote:
As viewed from alt.california, Bonnie ***** wrote:
Yo
Ok, bored now.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
This is not a cite from the current, mainstream, peer-reviewed,
scientific literature which supports your constant assertions.
Nice one!
Yeah, I read it somewhere.
Now go suck your boyfriend Stain's *****
And kick you aside? No, you just keep going; you're doing fine.
and shut the ***** up.
And how do you propose to make that happen, Bonnie?
Frankly, I'm still trying to figure out who "Stain" is.
Alberich
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 01:32:21 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:22:43 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:32:27 -0800, Jafo <a@nospam.invalid> wrote:
As viewed from alt.california, Bonnie ***** wrote:
Yo
Ok, bored now.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
This is not a cite from the current, mainstream, peer-reviewed,
scientific literature which supports your constant assertions.
Nice one!
Yeah, I read it somewhere.
Now go suck your boyfriend Stain's *****
And kick you aside? No, you just keep going; you're doing fine.
and shut the ***** up.
And how do you propose to make that happen, Bonnie?
Frankly, I'm still trying to figure out who "Stain" is.
Stain is everyone' pet name for Stan de SD.
His full pet name is Stain de STD.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 04:33:58 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:32:21 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:22:43 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:32:27 -0800, Jafo <a@nospam.invalid> wrote:
As viewed from alt.california, Bonnie ***** wrote:
Yo
Ok, bored now.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
This is not a cite from the current, mainstream, peer-reviewed,
scientific literature which supports your constant assertions.
Nice one!
Yeah, I read it somewhere.
Now go suck your boyfriend Stain's *****
And kick you aside? No, you just keep going; you're doing fine.
and shut the ***** up.
And how do you propose to make that happen, Bonnie?
Frankly, I'm still trying to figure out who "Stain" is.
Stain is everyone' pet name for Stan de SD.
His full pet name is Stain de STD.
Ahh... Thanks!
Alberich
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 08:40:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:33:58 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Stain is everyone' pet name for Stan de SD.
His full pet name is Stain de STD.
Ahh... Thanks!
You're not welcome.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 08:47:35 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:40:25 -0800, Bonnie B <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad>
wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:33:58 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Stain is everyone' pet name for Stan de SD.
His full pet name is Stain de STD.
Ahh... Thanks!
You're not welcome.
You're a real Dale Carnegie, ain't ya?
Alberich
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 10:50:25 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:47:35 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:40:25 -0800, Bonnie B <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad>
wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:33:58 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Stain is everyone' pet name for Stan de SD.
His full pet name is Stain de STD.
Ahh... Thanks!
You're not welcome.
You're a real Dale Carnegie, ain't ya?
Thank you very little, Mr. Bera.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 01:10:10 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:32:27 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Jafo
<a@nospam.invalid>
Ye
That's nice. Now go suck your boyfriend Stain's *****
and shut the ***** up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 10:22:26 PM |
|
|
As viewed from alt.california, Bonnie ***** wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:32:27 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Jafo
<a@nospam.invalid>
Ye
Tha
Sorry, but this is not a cite from the current, mainstream,
peer-reviewed, scientific literature which supports your constant
yowlings.
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 11:47:43 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:19:13 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:29:13 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
You *almost* flushed out the relevant stuff. Although I begin to
think you wouldn't know something relevant from a whole in your head.
Alberich
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 12:07:47 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:47:43 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Y
Ok, bored now.
You owe me some page numbers.
Got 'em?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
<flush>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 12:21:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:07:47 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:47:43 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Y
Ok, bored now.
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:07:34 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:46:35 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
O
Ok, bored now.
Figures--way over your head.
Questions:
(1) Want to have a conversation about the history of gay
marriage--excuse me!--"same-sex union" in the Church? You can quote
whatever revisionist historian you want, I will use primary text and
period writers.
(2) Why have you not yet disputed any of the substantive arguments
from Young or Shaw (or Paglia, or...)?
(3) Is this correct?: "If you don't already know why [the RCC is
concerned with all in the world], you will never understand. First,
the
RCC believes itself to have a divine mandate. You can disagree with
that all you want--I don't care, and won't be surprised when you do.
Second, part of this mandate includes certain social codes. Third,
another part of this mandate includes the command to teach all peoples
of this mandate. Which part of this do you have a hard time
understanding?
Now, I suppose you imply that you have a similar situation by your
statement that "When you can answer that honestly (like that'll ever
happen), then you will know why I post where I do." So, I would have
to imagine that you believe you have a divine mandate. (Except that
would be difficult without a belief in God.) Said mandate including
several social codes. (Again, problem with the mandate. But even so,
from whence come your codes?) And further, I imagine that you believe
that part of your mandate tells you to spread this news to other
people. (Again, mandate source problem.) Have I got that right?
Or is your personal code one more of "live and let live?" In which
case, coming in here is pretty danged hypocritical..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 12:26:15 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:21:25 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Fi
Ok, bored now.
You owe me some page numbers.
Got 'em?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
<flush>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 12:37:01 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:26:15 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:21:25 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Fi
Ok, bored now.
Figures--way over your head.
Questions:
(1) Want to have a conversation about the history of gay
marriage--excuse me!--"same-sex union" in the Church? You can quote
whatever revisionist historian you want, I will use primary text and
period writers.
(2) Why have you not yet disputed any of the substantive arguments
from Young or Shaw (or Paglia, or...)?
(3) Who peer-reviewed Boswell's book? How were they chosen?
(4) Is this correct?: "If you don't already know why [the RCC is
concerned with all in the world], you will never understand. First,
the
RCC believes itself to have a divine mandate. You can disagree with
that all you want--I don't care, and won't be surprised when you do.
Second, part of this mandate includes certain social codes. Third,
another part of this mandate includes the command to teach all peoples
of this mandate. Which part of this do you have a hard time
understanding?
Now, I suppose you imply that you have a similar situation by your
statement that "When you can answer that honestly (like that'll ever
happen), then you will know why I post where I do." So, I would have
to imagine that you believe you have a divine mandate. (Except that
would be difficult without a belief in God.) Said mandate including
several social codes. (Again, problem with the mandate. But even so,
from whence come your codes?) And further, I imagine that you believe
that part of your mandate tells you to spread this news to other
people. (Again, mandate source problem.) Have I got that right?
Or is your personal code one more of "live and let live?" In which
case, coming in here is pretty danged hypocritical..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 01:09:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:37:01 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Fig
Already answered, *****.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
<flush>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 01:14:12 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:09:25 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:37:01 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Questions:
(1) Want to have a conversation about the history of gay
marriage--excuse me!--"same-sex union" in the Church? You can quote
whatever revisionist historian you want, I will use primary text and
period writers.
(2) Why have you not yet disputed any of the substantive arguments
from Young or Shaw (or Paglia, or...)?
(3) Who peer-reviewed Boswell's book? How were they chosen?
(4) Is this correct?: "If you don't already know why [the RCC is
concerned with all in the world], you will never understand. First,
the
RCC believes itself to have a divine mandate. You can disagree with
that all you want--I don't care, and won't be surprised when you do.
Second, part of this mandate includes certain social codes. Third,
another part of this mandate includes the command to teach all peoples
of this mandate. Which part of this do you have a hard time
understanding?
Now, I suppose you imply that you have a similar situation by your
statement that "When you can answer that honestly (like that'll ever
happen), then you will know why I post where I do." So, I would have
to imagine that you believe you have a divine mandate. (Except that
would be difficult without a belief in God.) Said mandate including
several social codes. (Again, problem with the mandate. But even so,
from whence come your codes?) And further, I imagine that you believe
that part of your mandate tells you to spread this news to other
people. (Again, mandate source problem.) Have I got that right?
Or is your personal code one more of "live and let live?" In which
case, coming in here is pretty danged hypocritical..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 01:31:38 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:14:12 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:09:25 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:37:01 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Questions:
Already answered, *****.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
<flush>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 04:33:32 PM |
|
|
Questions:
(1) Want to have a conversation about the history of gay
marriage--excuse me!--"same-sex union" in the Church? You can quote
whatever revisionist historian you want, I will use primary text and
period writers.
(2) Why have you not yet disputed any of the substantive arguments
from Young or Shaw (or Paglia, or...)?
(3) Who peer-reviewed Boswell's book? How were they chosen?
(4) Is this correct?: "If you don't already know why [the RCC is
concerned with all in the world], you will never understand. First,
the
RCC believes itself to have a divine mandate. You can disagree with
that all you want--I don't care, and won't be surprised when you do.
Second, part of this mandate includes certain social codes. Third,
another part of this mandate includes the command to teach all peoples
of this mandate. Which part of this do you have a hard time
understanding?
Now, I suppose you imply that you have a similar situation by your
statement that "When you can answer that honestly (like that'll ever
happen), then you will know why I post where I do." So, I would have
to imagine that you believe you have a divine mandate. (Except that
would be difficult without a belief in God.) Said mandate including
several social codes. (Again, problem with the mandate. But even so,
from whence come your codes?) And further, I imagine that you believe
that part of your mandate tells you to spread this news to other
people. (Again, mandate source problem.) Have I got that right?
Or is your personal code one more of "live and let live?" In which
case, coming in here is pretty danged hypocritical..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 08:39:32 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:33:32 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Questions:
How many times will you be asking before you pull your head out of
your ***** and realize I already answered?
<flush asked and answered crap>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 08:47:12 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:39:32 -0800, Bonnie B <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad>
wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:33:32 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Questions:
How many times will you be asking before you pull your head out of
your ***** and realize I already answered?
<flush asked and answered crap>
I have searched for answers. I've seen some half-arsed answers to 1
and 2, but still nothing for the others. In fact, you pointedly
*refused* to answer four.
Alberich
(3) Who peer-reviewed Boswell's book? How were they chosen?
(4) Is this correct?: "If you don't already know why [the RCC is
concerned with all in the world], you will never understand. First,
the
RCC believes itself to have a divine mandate. You can disagree with
that all you want--I don't care, and won't be surprised when you do.
Second, part of this mandate includes certain social codes. Third,
another part of this mandate includes the command to teach all peoples
of this mandate. Which part of this do you have a hard time
understanding?
Now, I suppose you imply that you have a similar situation by your
statement that "When you can answer that honestly (like that'll ever
happen), then you will know why I post where I do." So, I would have
to imagine that you believe you have a divine mandate. (Except that
would be difficult without a belief in God.) Said mandate including
several social codes. (Again, problem with the mandate. But even so,
from whence come your codes?) And further, I imagine that you believe
that part of your mandate tells you to spread this news to other
people. (Again, mandate source problem.) Have I got that right?
Or is your personal code one more of "live and let live?" In which
case, coming in here is pretty danged hypocritical..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 10:49:55 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:47:12 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
I have searched for answers.
And what did you find when you shoved your head back up your rectum?
<flush already-answered questions>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
26 Mar 2006 10:55:08 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:07:56 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:50:40 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News 8aad22128bg2goujgd6bcclh8pndv8hjco@4ax.com,, Alberich at
Alberich@NoSpam.com, typed this:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:07:00 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News 122d7nbj2qguq30@corp.supernews.com,, Jim Higgins at
gordian238@hotmail.com, typed this:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:HQwVf.5219$HW2.1395@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
In News 122d5ccgck9lj5b@corp.supernews.com,, Jim Higgins at
gordian238@hotmail.com, typed this:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:AvwVf.7045$x94.1925@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
In News tb4d22d40cc8mnf0362llt2ig0dod5hj0t@4ax.com,, duke at
duckgumbo32@cox.net, typed this:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:15:53 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News mpidnUrr6sxsv7vZnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com,, J Young
at youngopinions@aol.com, typed this:
God bless them!!
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbccentral/content/local_news/epaper/2006/03/25/m1a_Church_0325.html
Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect
Yeah, nice... What would Jesus do? LOL!
What do you think? He threw the money changers out of his
Father's House for desecrating it.
Yet, he didn't beat them with a baseball bat.
What does a burglar deserve?
Who are you to judge?
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than
that of blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
He is certainly better able to judge than you.
No, he is not.
Remember that the
thief on the cross acknowledged that they were getting what they
deserved.
Yet, he went to heaven.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there
be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
Indeed he did but he first paid the penalty for being a thief-the
penalty was death.
He paid a penalty after his trial, and conviction. Not by a godless
mob with baseball bats.
Yeah, you're right. They may have had the wrong man. It was probably
Santa Claus coming to restore all that was taken.
Alberich
Whether it was the wrong man or not, you don't beat people with baseball
bats. Anyone for a silent alarm on the window, or is that too much to ask
from religionists? Of course, they probably enjoyed beating the man. Some
church.
I agree with the basic point. But I think you go about it the wrong
way, making it sound like there was any doubt that the man they beat
after he broke into the Church may not have been the man that broke
into the Church...
Yeah, they should have clubbed him to death.That's what Jesus would
have wanted. <eye roll>
So, how, exactly, is a mob beating the crap out of a robber with a
baseball bat a christian thing to do?
They couldn't have subdued him? Nah, because Jesus would have beaten
the crap out of him. <eye roll>
They couldn't have called the police first and then subdued him? Nah.
<eye roll>
And why did they just assume that he was the same burglar who had
struck before? Did they have fingerprints from the previous robberies?
Did they take this burglar's fingerprints from him after they clubbed
him and compare the two sets?
And no, Al, Andy did not imply or even suggest that there was any
doubt that this man was breaking and entering. That's your strawman
lie, which you are using to defend these people's actions, solely and
simply because they are your co-cultists of yours.
If a group of atheists had behaved so poorly, you would be screaming
for mercy and shouting about arresting the atheists.
But since it was a group of christstains, you simply _must_ make
excuses for them and lie lie lie about any assessment of the situation
which does not exculpate the christstains.
Good show, Mr. "Intellectual Honesty." <eye roll>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
26 Mar 2006 11:12:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:55:08 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:07:56 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:50:40 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News 8aad22128bg2goujgd6bcclh8pndv8hjco@4ax.com,, Alberich at
Alberich@NoSpam.com, typed this:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:07:00 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News 122d7nbj2qguq30@corp.supernews.com,, Jim Higgins at
gordian238@hotmail.com, typed this:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:HQwVf.5219$HW2.1395@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
In News 122d5ccgck9lj5b@corp.supernews.com,, Jim Higgins at
gordian238@hotmail.com, typed this:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:AvwVf.7045$x94.1925@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
In News tb4d22d40cc8mnf0362llt2ig0dod5hj0t@4ax.com,, duke at
duckgumbo32@cox.net, typed this:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:15:53 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News mpidnUrr6sxsv7vZnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com,, J Young
at youngopinions@aol.com, typed this:
God bless them!!
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbccentral/content/local_news/epaper/2006/03/25/m1a_Church_0325.html
Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect
Yeah, nice... What would Jesus do? LOL!
What do you think? He threw the money changers out of his
Father's House for desecrating it.
Yet, he didn't beat them with a baseball bat.
What does a burglar deserve?
Who are you to judge?
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than
that of blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
He is certainly better able to judge than you.
No, he is not.
Remember that the
thief on the cross acknowledged that they were getting what they
deserved.
Yet, he went to heaven.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there
be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
Indeed he did but he first paid the penalty for being a thief-the
penalty was death.
He paid a penalty after his trial, and conviction. Not by a godless
mob with baseball bats.
Yeah, you're right. They may have had the wrong man. It was probably
Santa Claus coming to restore all that was taken.
Alberich
Whether it was the wrong man or not, you don't beat people with baseball
bats. Anyone for a silent alarm on the window, or is that too much to ask
from religionists? Of course, they probably enjoyed beating the man. Some
church.
I agree with the basic point. But I think you go about it the wrong
way, making it sound like there was any doubt that the man they beat
after he broke into the Church may not have been the man that broke
into the Church...
Yeah, they should have clubbed him to death.That's what Jesus would
have wanted. <eye roll>
So, how, exactly, is a mob beating the crap out of a robber with a
baseball bat a christian thing to do?
They couldn't have subdued him? Nah, because Jesus would have beaten
the crap out of him. <eye roll>
They couldn't have called the police first and then subdued him? Nah.
<eye roll>
And why did they just assume that he was the same burglar who had
struck before? Did they have fingerprints from the previous robberies?
Did they take this burglar's fingerprints from him after they clubbed
him and compare the two sets?
Who said they assumed he was the same one. He was certainly *a*
burglar, unless you want to argue that he actually *was* Santa Claus.
Why do you make the point? Is everyone entitled to one free
burglarly?
And no, Al, Andy did not imply or even suggest that there was any
doubt that this man was breaking and entering. That's your strawman
lie, which you are using to defend these people's actions, solely and
simply because they are your co-cultists of yours.
I quote: "He paid a penalty after his trial, and conviction. Not by a
godless mob with baseball bats." If you can honestly say that you
can't see the implication, I would suggest that you go take a course
in basic comprehension.
If a group of atheists had behaved so poorly, you would be screaming
for mercy and shouting about arresting the atheists.
I've maintained throughout here that I think that acted wrongly. I
don't know why you've got such a hard-on, except for the fact that I
disagreed with you before. But grow a pair and actually argue with me
when we disagree on something. Looks kind of silly you trying to pick
a fight when I already agree with you.
But since it was a group of christstains, you simply _must_ make
excuses for them and lie lie lie about any assessment of the situation
which does not exculpate the christstains.
Cite where I say that I think they did the right thing. Go ahead,
just do it. (Mr Intellectual Honesty.)
Alberich
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 01:00:23 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:12:58 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:55:08 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:07:56 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:50:40 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News 8aad22128bg2goujgd6bcclh8pndv8hjco@4ax.com,, Alberich at
Alberich@NoSpam.com, typed this:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:07:00 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News 122d7nbj2qguq30@corp.supernews.com,, Jim Higgins at
gordian238@hotmail.com, typed this:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:HQwVf.5219$HW2.1395@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
In News 122d5ccgck9lj5b@corp.supernews.com,, Jim Higgins at
gordian238@hotmail.com, typed this:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:AvwVf.7045$x94.1925@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
In News tb4d22d40cc8mnf0362llt2ig0dod5hj0t@4ax.com,, duke at
duckgumbo32@cox.net, typed this:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:15:53 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News mpidnUrr6sxsv7vZnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com,, J Young
at youngopinions@aol.com, typed this:
God bless them!!
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbccentral/content/local_news/epaper/2006/03/25/m1a_Church_0325.html
Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect
Yeah, nice... What would Jesus do? LOL!
What do you think? He threw the money changers out of his
Father's House for desecrating it.
Yet, he didn't beat them with a baseball bat.
What does a burglar deserve?
Who are you to judge?
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than
that of blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
He is certainly better able to judge than you.
No, he is not.
Remember that the
thief on the cross acknowledged that they were getting what they
deserved.
Yet, he went to heaven.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there
be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
Indeed he did but he first paid the penalty for being a thief-the
penalty was death.
He paid a penalty after his trial, and conviction. Not by a godless
mob with baseball bats.
Yeah, you're right. They may have had the wrong man. It was probably
Santa Claus coming to restore all that was taken.
Alberich
Whether it was the wrong man or not, you don't beat people with baseball
bats. Anyone for a silent alarm on the window, or is that too much to ask
from religionists? Of course, they probably enjoyed beating the man. Some
church.
I agree with the basic point. But I think you go about it the wrong
way, making it sound like there was any doubt that the man they beat
after he broke into the Church may not have been the man that broke
into the Church...
Yeah, they should have clubbed him to death.That's what Jesus would
have wanted. <eye roll>
So, how, exactly, is a mob beating the crap out of a robber with a
baseball bat a christian thing to do?
They couldn't have subdued him? Nah, because Jesus would have beaten
the crap out of him. <eye roll>
They couldn't have called the police first and then subdued him? Nah.
<eye roll>
And why did they just assume that he was the same burglar who had
struck before? Did they have fingerprints from the previous robberies?
Did they take this burglar's fingerprints from him after they clubbed
him and compare the two sets?
Who said they assumed he was the same one.
" 'We think it was the same burglar who broke in two months ago. He
used the same window,' said Aristeo Paxtor, 31, who was the first to
confront the suspect."
Dumbass.
You can't even read a short article and retain basic facts. No wonder
you're afraid of the Boswell book.
He was certainly *a*
burglar, unless you want to argue that he actually *was* Santa Claus.
Why do you make the point? Is everyone entitled to one free
burglarly?
Oh, goodie -- another strawman, where you lie about what I said, and
then lie lie lie some more while you argue against your previous lie.
Good show, Mr. Intellectual Honesty.
And no, Al, Andy did not imply or even suggest that there was any
doubt that this man was breaking and entering. That's your strawman
lie, which you are using to defend these people's actions, solely and
simply because they are your co-cultists of yours.
I quote: "He paid a penalty after his trial, and conviction. Not by a
godless mob with baseball bats." If you can honestly say that you
can't see the implication, I would suggest that you go take a course
in basic comprehension.
The implication is that vigilante justice, even with a mandate from
your sky *****, is wrong.
The implication is that the christstains had no business, from a legal
standpoint, beating the ***** out of the crook.
The implication is that the christstains had no business, from a moral
standpoint, beating the ***** out of the crook.
The implication is that anyone who would support the crowd's actions,
as you have done, is one sick anarchistic *****.
Now, about your impending reading for comprehension class and
pathological lying support group meetings..........
If a group of atheists had behaved so poorly, you would be screaming
for mercy and shouting about arresting the atheists.
I've maintained throughout here that I think that acted wrongly.
And then you excused it. Typical christstain -- "we can do no wrong,
and if it was wrong, we'll rationalize it away."
I
don't know why you've got such a hard-on, except for the fact that I
disagreed with you before. But grow a pair and actually argue with me
when we disagree on something.
Oh, I do, sweetie. Desp[ite your not noticing that, I have:
-called you out for your tete-a-tete with Geloso where you gossiped
about me
- not hidden behind others' words while parroting those words as a
position I take on an issue
- not ignored the fact that those sources you used have lied
- not lied about others' positions (like you do routinely)
- not refused to examine both sides of an issue (like you do)
- confronted you directly for your crap (unlike you do)
Now, about that pair you need to grow so you can act like a man -----
Fuckin' christstains.
Looks kind of silly you trying to pick
a fight when I already agree with you.
Liar.
But since it was a group of christstains, you simply _must_ make
excuses for them and lie lie lie about any assessment of the situation
which does not exculpate the christstains.
Cite where I say that I think they did the right thing.
Oh goodie -- another strawman, where you lie about what I say and then
lie lie lie some more while you argue against the previous lie.
Now, about that reading for comprehension class you so desperately
need, followed by that 12-step group for pathological liars........
Go ahead,
just do it. (Mr Intellectual Honesty.)
Oh, how cute -- the lie lie lie portion had a coda.
Good christstain! <eye roll>
Oh, and bunky -- don't forget about those page numbers you owe me, to
verify your claims about Boswell.
After all, the one making the positive assertion is responsible for
proving his claims.
It is, in the end, the intellectually honest thing for you to do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 06:24:02 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:00:23 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:12:58 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:55:08 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:07:56 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:50:40 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News 8aad22128bg2goujgd6bcclh8pndv8hjco@4ax.com,, Alberich at
Alberich@NoSpam.com, typed this:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:07:00 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News 122d7nbj2qguq30@corp.supernews.com,, Jim Higgins at
gordian238@hotmail.com, typed this:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:HQwVf.5219$HW2.1395@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
In News 122d5ccgck9lj5b@corp.supernews.com,, Jim Higgins at
gordian238@hotmail.com, typed this:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:AvwVf.7045$x94.1925@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
In News tb4d22d40cc8mnf0362llt2ig0dod5hj0t@4ax.com,, duke at
duckgumbo32@cox.net, typed this:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:15:53 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL11@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
In News mpidnUrr6sxsv7vZnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com,, J Young
at youngopinions@aol.com, typed this:
God bless them!!
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbccentral/content/local_news/epaper/2006/03/25/m1a_Church_0325.html
Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect
Yeah, nice... What would Jesus do? LOL!
What do you think? He threw the money changers out of his
Father's House for desecrating it.
Yet, he didn't beat them with a baseball bat.
What does a burglar deserve?
Who are you to judge?
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than
that of blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
He is certainly better able to judge than you.
No, he is not.
Remember that the
thief on the cross acknowledged that they were getting what they
deserved.
Yet, he went to heaven.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there
be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
Indeed he did but he first paid the penalty for being a thief-the
penalty was death.
He paid a penalty after his trial, and conviction. Not by a godless
mob with baseball bats.
Yeah, you're right. They may have had the wrong man. It was probably
Santa Claus coming to restore all that was taken.
Alberich
Whether it was the wrong man or not, you don't beat people with baseball
bats. Anyone for a silent alarm on the window, or is that too much to ask
from religionists? Of course, they probably enjoyed beating the man. Some
church.
I agree with the basic point. But I think you go about it the wrong
way, making it sound like there was any doubt that the man they beat
after he broke into the Church may not have been the man that broke
into the Church...
Yeah, they should have clubbed him to death.That's what Jesus would
have wanted. <eye roll>
So, how, exactly, is a mob beating the crap out of a robber with a
baseball bat a christian thing to do?
They couldn't have subdued him? Nah, because Jesus would have beaten
the crap out of him. <eye roll>
They couldn't have called the police first and then subdued him? Nah.
<eye roll>
And why did they just assume that he was the same burglar who had
struck before? Did they have fingerprints from the previous robberies?
Did they take this burglar's fingerprints from him after they clubbed
him and compare the two sets?
Who said they assumed he was the same one.
" 'We think it was the same burglar who broke in two months ago. He
used the same window,' said Aristeo Paxtor, 31, who was the first to
confront the suspect."
My mistake. I was referring to this question: "So, how, exactly, is a
mob beating the crap out of a robber with a baseball bat a christian
thing to do?"--not the original article.
<snip>
You can't even read a short article and retain basic facts. No wonder
you're afraid of the Boswell book.
Just what I thought--you're simply stalking me because you don't like
opposing viewpoints. If you're really this hard up for attention, go
flip over a barstool, sit down, and enjoy the rest of the evening.
He was certainly *a*
burglar, unless you want to argue that he actually *was* Santa Claus.
Why do you make the point? Is everyone entitled to one free
burglarly?
Oh, goodie -- another strawman, where you lie about what I said, and
then lie lie lie some more while you argue against your previous lie.
Good show, Mr. Intellectual Honesty.
I love your exegesis, showing where I do these things. I begin to
understand why you hate Catholicism so much--because it means that we
aren't accepting *you* as God, taking everything *you* say at face
value.
(I'm still wondering, by the way, why you stay in this group if all
you do is complain about it...)
And no, Al, Andy did not imply or even suggest that there was any
doubt that this man was breaking and entering. That's your strawman
lie, which you are using to defend these people's actions, solely and
simply because they are your co-cultists of yours.
I quote: "He paid a penalty after his trial, and conviction. Not by a
godless mob with baseball bats." If you can honestly say that you
can't see the implication, I would suggest that you go take a course
in basic comprehension.
The implication is that vigilante justice is wrong.
Agreed, as edited.
The implication is that the christstains had no business, from a legal
standpoint, beating the ***** out of the crook.
Ditto.
The implication is that the christstains had no business, from a moral
standpoint, beating the ***** out of the crook.
Again, ditto.
The implication is that anyone who would support the crowd's actions,
as you have done, is one sick anarchistic *****.
I have not done so, as you will see if you open your eyes long enough.
I only said that they could be sure that the guy was a burglar.
<snip>
If a group of atheists had behaved so poorly, you would be screaming
for mercy and shouting about arresting the atheists.
I've maintained throughout here that I think that acted wrongly.
And then you excused it. Typical christstain -- "we can do no wrong,
and if it was wrong, we'll rationalize it away."
Show me where I excused it.
don't know why you've got such a hard-on, except for the fact that I
disagreed with you before. But grow a pair and actually argue with me
when we disagree on something.
Oh, I do, sweetie. Desp[ite your not noticing that, I have:
-called you out for your tete-a-tete with Geloso where you gossiped
about me
Gossiped? What are you, a fourth-grader? I can't call the guy up to
talk, so I responded to him here. Next time, I'll put up a warning
sign: Don't read, BB: You may get your pwetty widdle feewings hurt.
- not hidden behind others' words while parroting those words as a
position I take on an issue
Nobody's hidden. Except maybe you, who has yet to show where those
reviewers are wrong. Of course, it's much easier to hide behind the
red herring of "give me page numbers! waaaahhhh!"
- not ignored the fact that those sources you used have lied
As you have yet to substantiate.
- not lied about others' positions (like you do routinely)
Oh? Such as...?
- not refused to examine both sides of an issue (like you do)
Baloney.
- confronted you directly for your crap (unlike you do)
I don't directly confront myself for my crap? That makes a lot of
sense...
<snip rest of self-rightious rambling>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
27 Mar 2006 08:34:37 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:24:02 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Alberich
<Alberich@NoSpam.com>
Who said they assumed he was the same one.
" 'We think it was the same burglar who broke in two months ago. He
used the same window,' said Aristeo Paxtor, 31, who was the first to
confront the suspect."
My mistake.
One among many, to be sure.
Got those page numbers yet?
No?
Then shut the ***** up.
<flush>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "FED UP" |
|
| Title: Re: Fed-up church members stand guard, beat suspect |
26 Mar 2006 07:55:00 AM |
|
|
Yeah, nice... What would Jesus do? LOL!
Liberals do ever bother telling Christains what Jesus would do...
Oh know you and Hillary think you have Jesus all figured out and feel
compell to lecture Christians...
...wrong.....Liberals you know NOTHING about Jesus.....you really
embarrass yourselves.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
