| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Rev. 11D Meow!" |
| Date: |
02 Nov 2005 07:08:13 PM |
| Object: |
First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
.
|
|
| User: "brutus" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 07:56:14 PM |
|
|
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:SsqdnZ3HDrRhB_benZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@inreach.com...
no need to belive about so called ' salvation ' as there is no god to save
anyone anyhow.
Our atoms where born in the hart of Supernovas and some day they'll return
to the void of space when the earth itself is distroyed by our own Star
Sol 1.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
So where did that supernove come from?
Sleep tight!
Brutus
.
|
|
|
| User: "Starlord" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 11:38:31 AM |
|
|
Follow the Astronomy world, there's supernovas happing all the time, one was
just found a short time ago in M51 which means even more atoms have seeded
the far reachs of space.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net
In Garden Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden
Blast Off Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/starlords
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in message
news:2jUaf.25$Id6.6@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:SsqdnZ3HDrRhB_benZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@inreach.com...
no need to belive about so called ' salvation ' as there is no god to
save anyone anyhow.
Our atoms where born in the hart of Supernovas and some day they'll
return to the void of space when the earth itself is distroyed by our own
Star Sol 1.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
So where did that supernove come from?
Sleep tight!
Brutus
.
|
|
|
| User: "brutus" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 07:07:34 PM |
|
|
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:Pa6dnUBFbPegcvHeRVn-tg@inreach.com...
Follow the Astronomy world, there's supernovas happing all the time, one
was just found a short time ago in M51 which means even more atoms have
seeded the far reachs of space.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net
In Garden Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden
Blast Off Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/starlords
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in message
news:2jUaf.25$Id6.6@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:SsqdnZ3HDrRhB_benZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@inreach.com...
no need to belive about so called ' salvation ' as there is no god to
save anyone anyhow.
Our atoms where born in the hart of Supernovas and some day they'll
return to the void of space when the earth itself is distroyed by our
own Star Sol 1.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
So where did that supernove come from?
Sleep tight!
Brutus
So where did that supernova come from?
Sleep tight!
Brutus
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
06 Nov 2005 12:33:58 AM |
|
|
Your bum? ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 08:21:36 PM |
|
|
Your bum? ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 11:22:14 AM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com>
posting the following on Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:33:49 GMT iin
alt.atheism?
We all got to worship something.
No we don't. I don't worship science, I use it to explore the
universe.
I think this directly relates to "brutus'" ignorance. He "assumes" that
cause he worships something, that everyone must. It refuses to educate
itself and just guesses that everyone experiences the same thing it
does.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 03:45:02 PM |
|
|
Tim Crowley wrote:
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com>
posting the following on Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:33:49 GMT iin
alt.atheism?
We all got to worship something.
No we don't. I don't worship science, I use it to explore the
universe.
I think this directly relates to "brutus'" ignorance. He "assumes" that
cause he worships something, that everyone must. It refuses to educate
itself and just guesses that everyone experiences the same thing it
does.
I discriminate against idiots like you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 07:07:53 PM |
|
|
Al Smith wrote:
Tim Crowley wrote:
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com>
posting the following on Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:33:49 GMT iin
alt.atheism?
We all got to worship something.
No we don't. I don't worship science, I use it to explore the
universe.
I think this directly relates to "brutus'" ignorance. He "assumes" that
cause he worships something, that everyone must. It refuses to educate
itself and just guesses that everyone experiences the same thing it
does.
I discriminate against idiots like you.
you attempt to discriminate against everything you are afraid of.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?utf-8?B?UmHimaXDr+KBv2cgIEzimYLimYDimatpzrU=?=" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 01:10:55 AM |
|
|
brutus wrote:
"Max Masters!!!" <maxmasters@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:RumdnaOkGqeVevfenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in message
news:HZyaf.1285$uD5.476@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
At least NG had the common sense to couch therir claims in conditions:
"Known as population III stars, the distant bodies *are thought* to have
formed just 200 million years after the big bang, the event that *in
theory* created the universe some 14 billion years ago. " Most of the
members of the First Church of Evolution seems to forget that they are
worshipping theories.
Brutus
Science is a methodology. Please stop trying to equate worship (which
is a necessarily religious notion) with measurement.
We all got to worship something. And please stop trying to tell me what to
do. Do I tell YOU what to do? Nope.
Uhmmm. ... Isn't this called "Worshiping"
Brutus
.
|
|
|
| User: "Twittering One" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 03:11:48 AM |
|
|
"Science is a methodology.
Please stop trying to equate worship
(which
Is a necessarily religious notion)
With measurement."
~ Max Master
"Not if 4 Pounds Sterling,
Darling."
~ Sheriff Blair
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 02:29:39 AM |
|
|
Contrary to the twelve brazilian versions of xtianity that can't agree
what color Jeezus painted his toenails on Tuesday, eh?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Starlord" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 10:01:08 AM |
|
|
100% Bull *****, the Hubble Deep Space Image shows some of the 1st Galaxys
and they are at lest 12 BILLION years old.
That makes your so called 6,660 years ( that alone makes it a fake number )
Null and Void.
Go Jump Down a Black Hole.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Posted 100% Pure Garbage.
.
|
|
|
| User: "God is a Republican" |
|
| Title: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 11:51:36 AM |
|
|
As Jesus has revealed through his defense plans,
Scooter Libbey is most definitely innocent on all
charges!
First, he's asking for a trial by jury. There's no
secrets in a trial by jury. All the jurors are
supposed to be randomly selected, with the defense
having the option of challenging any juror they
deem as something other than an ordinary,
loud-mouthed average American.
Next, they're asking for classified information. Yup.
You see, there's all these files & stuff that pretty
much say Scooter Libbey is innocent. But they don't
know which files they are.... or it's all written in
invisible ink or something. Anyhow, if the people
Libbey is going on trial to protect don't agree to
release even one classified document, not only does
that make a mistrial very likely, but it's the basis
for a guaranteed appeal if by some miracle Scooter
is convicted.
Even for genuinely innocent people, when the
government withholds information that the defense
argues is critical to their case, convictions are
often over-turned!
But, hey, why take the risk?
Libbey is also planning on calling administration
officials to testify UNDER OATH at this public
jury trial. They've even dropped ***** Cheney's
name in their threats...errrr... hints.
This places "Justice" directly at odds with "Executive
privilege." Yup. The administration has often been
quick to invoke "Executive privileges" in their efforts
to avoid answering for anything. But if they do that
now the defense has a likely mistrial and/or automatic
appeal of any conviction. And if they don't do it then
administration officials will have to testify under oath,
potentially revealing all kinds of damaging tid-bits,
including implicated other officials and/or revealing
other crimes.
And then, of course, they're going to re-play the
"Jouralism" card. Yup. They're also talking about
calling journalists as witnesses, starting that whole
"Protecting the source" battle all over again... dragging
things out for months & months at a time.
And then there's the fact that Libbey is an insider. He
knows where the bodies are buried. If the administration
doesn't play ball with him, he can easily reveal all
sorts of secrets...errr... "As part of his defense," of
course... ensuring that the invisible hand of the Bush
junta will be pulling all the right strings on Libbey's
behalf.
Now I ask you, would a guilty man stoop to all this?
NO!
Because, um, because a guilty man would want to
AVOID the appearance of being guilty. Right?
So Scooter Libbey is innocent.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim07D5" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 11:57:52 AM |
|
|
"God is a Republican" <gymraven@hotmail.com> said:
As Jesus has revealed through his defense plans,
Scooter Libbey is most definitely innocent on all
charges!
First, he's asking for a trial by jury. There's no
secrets in a trial by jury. All the jurors are
supposed to be randomly selected, with the defense
having the option of challenging any juror they
deem as something other than an ordinary,
loud-mouthed average American.
Next, they're asking for classified information. Yup.
You see, there's all these files & stuff that pretty
much say Scooter Libbey is innocent. But they don't
know which files they are.... or it's all written in
invisible ink or something. Anyhow, if the people
Libbey is going on trial to protect don't agree to
release even one classified document, not only does
that make a mistrial very likely, but it's the basis
for a guaranteed appeal if by some miracle Scooter
is convicted.
Even for genuinely innocent people, when the
government withholds information that the defense
argues is critical to their case, convictions are
often over-turned!
But, hey, why take the risk?
Libbey is also planning on calling administration
officials to testify UNDER OATH at this public
jury trial. They've even dropped ***** Cheney's
name in their threats...errrr... hints.
This places "Justice" directly at odds with "Executive
privilege." Yup. The administration has often been
quick to invoke "Executive privileges" in their efforts
to avoid answering for anything. But if they do that
now the defense has a likely mistrial and/or automatic
appeal of any conviction. And if they don't do it then
administration officials will have to testify under oath,
potentially revealing all kinds of damaging tid-bits,
including implicated other officials and/or revealing
other crimes.
And then, of course, they're going to re-play the
"Jouralism" card. Yup. They're also talking about
calling journalists as witnesses, starting that whole
"Protecting the source" battle all over again... dragging
things out for months & months at a time.
And then there's the fact that Libbey is an insider. He
knows where the bodies are buried. If the administration
doesn't play ball with him, he can easily reveal all
sorts of secrets...errr... "As part of his defense," of
course... ensuring that the invisible hand of the Bush
junta will be pulling all the right strings on Libbey's
behalf.
Now I ask you, would a guilty man stoop to all this?
NO!
Because, um, because a guilty man would want to
AVOID the appearance of being guilty. Right?
So Scooter Libbey is innocent.
This will make him not "Innocent", but will make all he needs to be:
"Not Guilty" which is all a jury can say.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Welch" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 11:53:24 AM |
|
|
"God is a Republican" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XdGdnRx29YsD1vfeRVn-iA@comcast.com...
First, he's asking for a trial by jury.
Not really. A "not guilty" plea is routine in most arraignments. The
defendant reserves the right to alter his or her plea at any time during the
proceedings.
There's no secrets in a trial by jury.
False. There are a LOT of secrets in a trial by jury.
--
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 12:40:42 PM |
|
|
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote
First, he's asking for a trial by jury.
Not really.
Yes, really. The defense has already revealed that much.
There's no secrets in a trial by jury.
False.
Wrong again, though I'm sure that you're used to it at this
point.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Welch" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 01:26:38 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HNOdna_yS_29yvfenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
First, he's asking for a trial by jury.
Not really.
Yes, really. The defense has already revealed that much.
LOL. No, not really. What the defense has "revealed" are sound-bites to
the press to do damage control.
There's no secrets in a trial by jury.
False.
Wrong again, though I'm sure that you're used to it at this
point.
Wow - you really are a stupid ***** with no idea how trials work.
Do you know what a "discovery process" is? Do you know what it means to
"admit" evidence? Do you know what it means when evidence is NOT admitted?
Do you know what a "gag rule" is?
Tell me again that there are no secrets in a trial by jury you ignorant
pinhead.
--
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
04 Nov 2005 06:34:34 AM |
|
|
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote
Yes, really. The defense has already revealed that much.
LOL. No, not really. What the defense has "revealed" are
sound-bites to the press to do damage control.
What the revealed wasn't "damage control." It was a shot
fired across the bow of the Bush administration. They said
that they intend to call administration officials as witnesses,
and classified information as evidence.
Wow - you really are a stupid ***** with no idea how trials work.
For saying there are no secret jury trials? Hardly.
This is already an extremely high profile case. And the defense
does have the power to challenge any juror they think is
something other than Joe & Jane average American.
If the administration doesn't play ball with the defense, all their
dirty laundry is going to get hung out on the line.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde by a commodius vicus of" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 08:21:42 PM |
|
|
Joseph Welch wrote:
"God is a Republican" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XdGdnRx29YsD1vfeRVn-iA@comcast.com...
First, he's asking for a trial by jury.
Not really. A "not guilty" plea is routine in most arraignments. The
defendant reserves the right to alter his or her plea at any time during the
proceedings.
Even Bigger Thomas pled innocent before the trial started.
--
Had Tolstoy confined himself to war or peace, he could have been
finished in seven hundred and fifty pages.
--
In a day and age when some people would think nothing of throwing stones
at Rosa Parks, she dared to rock the bus. Bully for her!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 11:58:31 AM |
|
|
God is a Republican wrote:
So Scooter Libbey is innocent.
Who the hell is Scooter Libbey?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Quarlous" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 12:42:09 PM |
|
|
On 3 Nov 2005 09:58:31 -0800, "Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com>
wrote:
God is a Republican wrote:
So Scooter Libbey is innocent.
Who the hell is Scooter Libbey?
I think it's supposed to be Scootie Libby.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP 2006" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 01:10:34 PM |
|
|
"Tom Quarlous" <bartholomew@benjonson.com> wrote
I think it's supposed to be Scootie Libby.
Do you? Think? Ever?
You frigging liberal homo! Go back to France, and take
John Kerry with you!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 04:11:51 PM |
|
|
GOP 2006 wrote:
"Tom Quarlous" <bartholomew@benjonson.com> wrote
I think it's supposed to be Scootie Libby.
Do you? Think? Ever?
You frigging liberal homo! Go back to France, and take
John Kerry with you!
Aww, the brains of the GOP. Please post often.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: Scooter Libbey Innocent! |
03 Nov 2005 05:02:32 PM |
|
|
GOP 2006 wrote:
"Tom Quarlous" <bartholomew@benjonson.com> wrote
I think it's supposed to be Scootie Libby.
Do you? Think? Ever?
You frigging liberal homo! Go back to France, and take
John Kerry with you!
Aww, the brains of the GOP. Please post often.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Double-A" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 10:49:36 AM |
|
|
Starlord wrote:
100% Bull *****, the Hubble Deep Space Image shows some of the 1st Galaxys
and they are at lest 12 BILLION years old.
That makes your so called 6,660 years ( that alone makes it a fake number )
Null and Void.
Go Jump Down a Black Hole.
There are no black holes, Starbuck!
Double-A
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "heathdwatts" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 07:26:47 PM |
|
|
How in the world does that show that ID is true? ID is BS.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde by a commodius vicus of" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 10:49:52 PM |
|
|
heathdwatts wrote:
How in the world does that show that ID is true? ID is BS.
Not entirely unike those first stars dimly shining through the aeons,
you aren't too bright either, are you?
--
Had Tolstoy confined himself to war or peace, he could have been
finished in seven hundred and fifty pages.
--
In a day and age when some people would think nothing of throwing stones
at Rosa Parks, she dared to rock the bus. Bully for her!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 11:16:25 AM |
|
|
On 2 Nov 2005 17:08:13 -0800, "Rev. 11D Meow!"
<rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote:
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 01:53:59 AM |
|
|
On 2 Nov 2005 17:08:13 -0800, "Rev. 11D Meow!"
<rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote:
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
Are you really this fucking stupid, or are you just pretending?
I call Loki.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 04:05:18 AM |
|
|
Kali tells me what to do, each and every moment.
What say ewe, doofuss?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 11:20:36 AM |
|
|
On 2 Nov 2005 17:08:13 -0800, "Rev. 11D Meow!"
<rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote:
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
Fucking kindergarteners.
[]
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|