| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Rev. 11D Meow!" |
| Date: |
03 Nov 2005 01:08:13 AM |
| Object: |
First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
.
|
|
| User: "da_bastige" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 08:51:00 AM |
|
|
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
I do believe in Intelligent Design. I do not believe the Earth is only
6,000 years old. If you will look in the Book of Job, it talks of Creation
as a time when the "Sons of God sang for joy." Those can not be Angels.
Those has to be literal Sons. Why? In the New Testament, it speaks of God
never calling an Angel a Son. Even in Psalms. So I subscribe to a "Cyclic
Earth" Theory: That all this has happened before, Before the Creation,
before this current Cycle. There is nothing new under the Sun. That at the
Creation, Earth already was, because it was without form and void. A
Carpenter is only as good as the materials He has to work with. Also,
Peakes Commentary on the Bible says that the word "Created" in Genesis means
to "Carve out," not a literal create out of Nothing. How many Cycles the
Earth has had, only God knows, but I think its funny how finite Man tries to
find out the way of God. They are very mysterious. You, my friend need to
read and study more.
Da
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 10:07:16 AM |
|
|
Didn't Job, like get all infected with AIDS or something like that?
EWE!!!!
SHEEP, especially the people kind, FUCKING DISGUST ME!!!!
Go soak your intestines in some other manure or worse!
EWE EWE EWE!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "da_bastige" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 06:10:07 AM |
|
|
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131012436.898401.5860@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Didn't Job, like get all infected with AIDS or something like that?
EWE!!!!
SHEEP, especially the people kind, FUCKING DISGUST ME!!!!
Go soak your intestines in some other manure or worse!
EWE EWE EWE!!!
Idiots Fred Garvin,and Rev 11d meow has made my block senders list. buh
bye. dont forget to write. I see no serious debate here. Just blasphemy
and pratt diatribes.
DA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 08:25:41 AM |
|
|
I take it you had you humor gland removed when you had that brain
reduction surgery, eh?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 12:06:23 PM |
|
|
On 3 Nov 2005 02:07:16 -0800, "Rev. 11D Meow!"
<rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote:
Didn't Job, like get all infected with AIDS or something like that?
EWE!!!!
SHEEP, especially the people kind, FUCKING DISGUST ME!!!!
Go soak your intestines in some other manure or worse!
EWE EWE EWE!!!
Drunk again?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Piranha tank missionaries" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 09:23:12 AM |
|
|
It started with a Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!!.
Who (other than "da_bastige" <aperio@frontiernet.net>) would have
guessed it would end like:
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
I do believe in Intelligent Design. I do not believe the Earth is only
6,000 years old. If you will look in the Book of Job, it talks of Creation
as a time when the "Sons of God sang for joy." Those can not be Angels.
Those has to be literal Sons. Why? In the New Testament, it speaks of God
never calling an Angel a Son. Even in Psalms. So I subscribe to a "Cyclic
Earth" Theory: That all this has happened before, Before the Creation,
before this current Cycle. There is nothing new under the Sun. That at the
Creation, Earth already was, because it was without form and void. A
Carpenter is only as good as the materials He has to work with. Also,
Peakes Commentary on the Bible says that the word "Created" in Genesis means
to "Carve out," not a literal create out of Nothing. How many Cycles the
Earth has had, only God knows, but I think its funny how finite Man tries to
find out the way of God. They are very mysterious. You, my friend need to
read and study more.
Da
Thanks for that welter of creative stupidity. I think it's funny how
people who believe in god try to pretend they are being honest.
------------------------------------------------
Conflict over the exact will/purpose/nature of God cannot ever be
resolved, since there are no facts to go on.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 10:20:45 AM |
|
|
The absolute most funny part is...
I actually do believe in some sort of intelligence behind all this
Mystery Of Life and all that rots beneath it and such and stuff.
Thees ID nerkles simply don't plain have a clue how said Intelligent
Design may just plain be responsible for all those non-existent fossil
evidences and such and stuff.
It really cracks me up to see the Jelly Beans jump and squirm when
their cherished belief systems crumble.
*****! I don't know how any and/or all this stuff got here any better
than the rest do.
Belief? A Dying Prospect! If you ask/Axe me.
Who Fucking Cares Where All This Miracle Came From?
It's Live! maybe
It's Real!! maybe
It's Happening Now!!! maybe
WHO CARES?
Usenet sure doesn't have enough fucking bandwidth to explore what we as
the NOW EXISTENT HUMYN RICE can come up with in its lame
discom'BOB"ulated disunderstander of what really really.
Scientists are at least honest enough to say, "WE ARE NOT SURE, YET.
but here is what we experience and can measure so far with our limited
lame-***** tool fabricated from eons of gathered experience."
I have no freakin' clue what 'the other side' has to say.
But, I do hear a sense of sticking to guns built in 4000 DC... or
before.
THE KING TOLD ME TO SAY THIS SO I BELIEVE!!!
DOH!
whatever, doofusses.
Until you can prove there isn't three moons arond pluto, a planet you
disavow having ever existed in the first place, and you can tell me how
the phases of the moon work in conjunction with your false calendar,
and you can prove to me the Earth is flat and the sun rotates around
her, despite my own experiencial measurements to the contrary.
JESUS SAVES!
Well. Okay.
Jesus Saves SHEEP!!!
and what goes around keeps going around
and the proof is in the tapioca...
whatever..
can ewe explain ???
never mind
never had one
never will
.
|
|
|
| User: "Piranha tank missionaries" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 12:37:15 PM |
|
|
It started with a Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!!.
Who (other than "Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com>) would have
guessed it would end like:
The absolute most funny part is...
I actually do believe in some sort of intelligence behind all this
Mystery Of Life and all that rots beneath it and such and stuff.
Thees ID nerkles simply don't plain have a clue how said Intelligent
Design may just plain be responsible for all those non-existent fossil
evidences and such and stuff.
It really cracks me up to see the Jelly Beans jump and squirm when
their cherished belief systems crumble.
*****! I don't know how any and/or all this stuff got here any better
than the rest do.
Belief? A Dying Prospect! If you ask/Axe me.
Who Fucking Cares Where All This Miracle Came From?
It's Live! maybe
It's Real!! maybe
It's Happening Now!!! maybe
WHO CARES?
Usenet sure doesn't have enough fucking bandwidth to explore what we as
the NOW EXISTENT HUMYN RICE can come up with in its lame
discom'BOB"ulated disunderstander of what really really.
Scientists are at least honest enough to say, "WE ARE NOT SURE, YET.
but here is what we experience and can measure so far with our limited
lame-***** tool fabricated from eons of gathered experience."
I have no freakin' clue what 'the other side' has to say.
But, I do hear a sense of sticking to guns built in 4000 DC... or
before.
THE KING TOLD ME TO SAY THIS SO I BELIEVE!!!
DOH!
whatever, doofusses.
Until you can prove there isn't three moons arond pluto, a planet you
disavow having ever existed in the first place, and you can tell me how
the phases of the moon work in conjunction with your false calendar,
and you can prove to me the Earth is flat and the sun rotates around
her, despite my own experiencial measurements to the contrary.
JESUS SAVES!
Well. Okay.
Jesus Saves SHEEP!!!
and what goes around keeps going around
and the proof is in the tapioca...
whatever..
can ewe explain ???
never mind
never had one
never will
Now I get it. You're a performance poet.
------------------------------------------------
Conflict over the exact will/purpose/nature of God cannot ever be
resolved, since there are no facts to go on.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 02:11:40 PM |
|
|
uh, thanks, i think... :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Liz" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 12:19:57 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:51:00 GMT, "da_bastige"
<aperio@frontiernet.net> in news message
<Ubkaf.1109$lg.672@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
I do believe in Intelligent Design. I do not believe the Earth is only
6,000 years old. If you will look in the Book of Job, it talks of Creation
as a time when the "Sons of God sang for joy." Those can not be Angels.
Those has to be literal Sons. Why? In the New Testament, it speaks of God
never calling an Angel a Son. Even in Psalms. So I subscribe to a "Cyclic
Earth" Theory: That all this has happened before, Before the Creation,
before this current Cycle. There is nothing new under the Sun. That at the
Creation, Earth already was, because it was without form and void. A
Carpenter is only as good as the materials He has to work with. Also,
Peakes Commentary on the Bible says that the word "Created" in Genesis means
to "Carve out," not a literal create out of Nothing. How many Cycles the
Earth has had, only God knows, but I think its funny how finite Man tries to
find out the way of God. They are very mysterious. You, my friend need to
read and study more.
Wow! All that from reading, nay studying, one book.
Do you have physical evidence to support your interpretation?
Liz #658 BAAWA
I find it absolutely incredible that a creator god and his savior son
would, instead of coming down to earth and handing us their message
personally, choose to communicate with mankind through cheese sandwiches.
- Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Max Masters!!!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 04:43:07 AM |
|
|
"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:7ovjm19caomc3fhbanrjs4aju51haev4n4@4ax.com...
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:51:00 GMT, "da_bastige"
<aperio@frontiernet.net> in news message
<Ubkaf.1109$lg.672@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
I do believe in Intelligent Design. I do not believe the Earth is only
6,000 years old. If you will look in the Book of Job, it talks of
Creation
as a time when the "Sons of God sang for joy." Those can not be Angels.
Those has to be literal Sons. Why? In the New Testament, it speaks of God
never calling an Angel a Son. Even in Psalms. So I subscribe to a
"Cyclic
Earth" Theory: That all this has happened before, Before the Creation,
before this current Cycle. There is nothing new under the Sun. That at
the
Creation, Earth already was, because it was without form and void. A
Carpenter is only as good as the materials He has to work with. Also,
Peakes Commentary on the Bible says that the word "Created" in Genesis
means
to "Carve out," not a literal create out of Nothing. How many Cycles the
Earth has had, only God knows, but I think its funny how finite Man tries
to
find out the way of God. They are very mysterious. You, my friend need
to
read and study more.
Wow! All that from reading, nay studying, one book.
Do you have physical evidence to support your interpretation?
Never confuse science with metaphysics.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 02:24:47 PM |
|
|
Well, if it wasn't for eBay selling Mother Mary Cheese sandwiches, I
guess we wouldn't all be laughing so hard.
Did you see the Bleeding Bicycle Pump story?
WHOA!
It's A Fucking MIRACLE!!!
whatever... ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Liz" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 01:22:40 AM |
|
|
On 3 Nov 2005 06:24:47 -0800, "Rev. 11D Meow!"
<rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> in news message
<1131027887.355331.282020@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Well, if it wasn't for eBay selling Mother Mary Cheese sandwiches, I
guess we wouldn't all be laughing so hard.
Did you see the Bleeding Bicycle Pump story?
No, I missed that, but it couldn't have been better than the Mary in
the salt-stained-underpass story.
WHOA!
It's A Fucking MIRACLE!!!
I'm trying to manufacture little urine stained pieces of wood that
look like the Madonna® and Child®, but I need help or I need to drink
more. One or the other.
whatever... ;-)
Überwench #658 Now a *real* atheist!
Dame Liz the Undaunted Ath.D BAAWA
Charter Member of SMASH
and Queen of the known universe
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "z" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 02:49:53 PM |
|
|
da_bastige wrote:
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
I do believe in Intelligent Design. I do not believe the Earth is only
6,000 years old. If you will look in the Book of Job, it talks of Creation
as a time when the "Sons of God sang for joy." Those can not be Angels.
Those has to be literal Sons. Why? In the New Testament, it speaks of God
never calling an Angel a Son. Even in Psalms. So I subscribe to a "Cyclic
Earth" Theory: That all this has happened before, Before the Creation,
before this current Cycle. There is nothing new under the Sun. That at the
Creation, Earth already was, because it was without form and void. A
Carpenter is only as good as the materials He has to work with. Also,
Peakes Commentary on the Bible says that the word "Created" in Genesis means
to "Carve out," not a literal create out of Nothing. How many Cycles the
Earth has had, only God knows, but I think its funny how finite Man tries to
find out the way of God. They are very mysterious. You, my friend need to
read and study more.
Da
The trouble is that since we haven't even come up with a reliable
universal definition of human intelligence, when we speak of divine, or
even just nonhuman intelligence, everybody has a different definition
in mind. When a crow figures out that a scarecrow is harmless, is he
being intelligent, or just doing what comes natural to him? Similarly,
when cosmic rays pass through a magnetic field and create matter, is
that intelligent planning or just a neat property of physics?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCM" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 02:57:53 PM |
|
|
I don't know that hyperspace theory is any better than fundamentalist
christianity at trying to use this small valve that is the conscious
human mind to understand the universe.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Smol" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
03 Nov 2005 04:16:07 PM |
|
|
da_bastige wrote:
I do believe in Intelligent Design. I do not believe the Earth is only
6,000 years old.
Doesn't matter, since it's all equally stupid.
RS
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "brutus" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 01:39:51 AM |
|
|
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
At least NG had the common sense to couch therir claims in conditions:
"Known as population III stars, the distant bodies *are thought* to have
formed just 200 million years after the big bang, the event that *in theory*
created the universe some 14 billion years ago. " Most of the members of
the First Church of Evolution seems to forget that they are worshipping
theories.
Brutus
.
|
|
|
| User: "Max Masters!!!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 04:45:59 AM |
|
|
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in message
news:HZyaf.1285$uD5.476@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
At least NG had the common sense to couch therir claims in conditions:
"Known as population III stars, the distant bodies *are thought* to have
formed just 200 million years after the big bang, the event that *in
theory* created the universe some 14 billion years ago. " Most of the
members of the First Church of Evolution seems to forget that they are
worshipping theories.
Brutus
Science is a methodology. Please stop trying to equate worship (which
is a necessarily religious notion) with measurement.
.
|
|
|
| User: "brutus" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 05:33:49 AM |
|
|
"Max Masters!!!" <maxmasters@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:RumdnaOkGqeVevfenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in message
news:HZyaf.1285$uD5.476@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
At least NG had the common sense to couch therir claims in conditions:
"Known as population III stars, the distant bodies *are thought* to have
formed just 200 million years after the big bang, the event that *in
theory* created the universe some 14 billion years ago. " Most of the
members of the First Church of Evolution seems to forget that they are
worshipping theories.
Brutus
Science is a methodology. Please stop trying to equate worship (which
is a necessarily religious notion) with measurement.
We all got to worship something. And please stop trying to tell me what to
do. Do I tell YOU what to do? Nope.
Brutus
.
|
|
|
| User: "da_bastige" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 06:12:29 AM |
|
|
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in message
news:1pCaf.5509$yX2.1138@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Max Masters!!!" <maxmasters@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:RumdnaOkGqeVevfenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in message
news:HZyaf.1285$uD5.476@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130980093.347827.117750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
And they are only 6,660 years old!!!
Well, so much for needing to fight for whether Intelligent Design is
true or not.
This PROVES ID is true!!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1102_051102_firststarlight.html
Yippee!
Yee Haw!!
Yahooie!!!
neener neener neener
At least NG had the common sense to couch therir claims in conditions:
"Known as population III stars, the distant bodies *are thought* to
have
formed just 200 million years after the big bang, the event that *in
theory* created the universe some 14 billion years ago. " Most of the
members of the First Church of Evolution seems to forget that they are
worshipping theories.
Brutus
Science is a methodology. Please stop trying to equate worship (which
is a necessarily religious notion) with measurement.
We all got to worship something. And please stop trying to tell me what
to
do. Do I tell YOU what to do? Nope.
Brutus
In the beginning God created Heaven and Earth. Then Satan created
usenet...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Starlord" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 02:56:14 PM |
|
|
Not realy, I worship NO so called GOD, it's all nothing but BS made up by
the Mind of Men to try and CONTROL other men's thinking and actions.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in message
news:1pCaf.5509$yX2.1138@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
We all got to worship something. And please stop trying to tell me what
to do. Do I tell YOU what to do? Nope.
Brutus
.
|
|
|
| User: "brutus" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 04:57:23 PM |
|
|
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:NoOdnRjOZ8aV6vbeRVn-gg@inreach.com...
Not realy, I worship NO so called GOD, it's all nothing but BS made up by
the Mind of Men to try and CONTROL other men's thinking and actions.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Like it or not we ALL worship something. You have chosen science, even
though you are unwilling to admit it. You put your trust in it, you feel it
is the answer to life.
Brutus
.
|
|
|
| User: "Liz" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 05:54:06 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:57:23 GMT, "brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> in
news message <TpMaf.5618$Rl1.4631@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
wrote:
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:NoOdnRjOZ8aV6vbeRVn-gg@inreach.com...
Not realy, I worship NO so called GOD, it's all nothing but BS made up by
the Mind of Men to try and CONTROL other men's thinking and actions.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Like it or not we ALL worship something. You have chosen science, even
though you are unwilling to admit it. You put your trust in it, you feel it
is the answer to life.
That is so inane. Science is a method by which we can gathering and
collate information about the physical universe. It isn't something
to worship.
The problem is that you can't imagine anyone who doesn't worship
because you can't imagine that you could live that way. Your
projection doesn't determine how I act. Get over it.
Liz #658 BAAWA
Many...freely confess that they believe what it makes them
feel good to believe. Evidence doesn't play much of a role.
They are alleviating their fear of randomness by identifying
regularities that are not there. - Murray Gell-Mann
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 05:42:29 AM |
|
|
"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:1k7nm1dimpe5n01poh3lc84si6tcka315c@4ax.com...
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:57:23 GMT, "brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> in
news message <TpMaf.5618$Rl1.4631@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
wrote:
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:NoOdnRjOZ8aV6vbeRVn-gg@inreach.com...
Not realy, I worship NO so called GOD, it's all nothing but BS made up
by
the Mind of Men to try and CONTROL other men's thinking and actions.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Like it or not we ALL worship something. You have chosen science, even
though you are unwilling to admit it. You put your trust in it, you feel
it
is the answer to life.
That is so inane. Science is a method by which we can gathering and
collate information about the physical universe. It isn't something
to worship.
The problem is that you can't imagine anyone who doesn't worship
because you can't imagine that you could live that way. Your
projection doesn't determine how I act. Get over it.
Wasted effort, I'm afraid.
Stupus is among that sad lot who've drunk so deeply from the Holy Kool-Aid
that they simply cannot imagine life without "believing" in something.
Strangely, these same people will insist to their dying breath that they
know more about what belief is than atheists, often conflating it with
knowledge.
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 06:41:41 AM |
|
|
Pinch Yourself Really Hard!!!
Does It Hurt?
IT'S GOD SWILL!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 07:58:59 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:57:23 GMT, in alt.atheism
"brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com> wrote in
<TpMaf.5618$Rl1.4631@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>:
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:NoOdnRjOZ8aV6vbeRVn-gg@inreach.com...
Not realy, I worship NO so called GOD, it's all nothing but BS made up by
the Mind of Men to try and CONTROL other men's thinking and actions.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Like it or not we ALL worship something. You have chosen science, even
though you are unwilling to admit it. You put your trust in it, you feel it
is the answer to life.
You must be very proud of your personal definition of 'worship'. Why not
join the rest of the English-speaking world and use their words, instead
of your own.
--
"... There's glory for you."
"I don't know what you mean by 'glory,'" Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiles contemptuously. "Of course you don't--till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
"But glory doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument," Alice objected.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master--that's all."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 08:25:08 PM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and "brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com>
posting the following on Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:57:23 GMT iin
alt.atheism?
Like it or not we ALL worship something. You have chosen science, even
though you are unwilling to admit it. You put your trust in it, you feel it
is the answer to life.
You have a very, very odd twist on the meaning of worship there.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 05:48:40 AM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:8sgnm1tor8jb129nt92t7824afn26sim7m@4ax.com...
What's so funny about peace, love and "brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com>
posting the following on Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:57:23 GMT iin
alt.atheism?
Like it or not we ALL worship something. You have chosen science, even
though you are unwilling to admit it. You put your trust in it, you feel
it
is the answer to life.
You have a very, very odd twist on the meaning of worship there.
This is exactly why Humpty Dumpty is mentioned so often in discussions
between Christians and atheists.
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
05 Nov 2005 05:27:29 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:48:40 -0800, in alt.atheism
"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote in
<yr-dnfszOOHx2vHenZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@cablespeedwa.com>:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:8sgnm1tor8jb129nt92t7824afn26sim7m@4ax.com...
What's so funny about peace, love and "brutus" <brutus@thebrute.com>
posting the following on Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:57:23 GMT iin
alt.atheism?
Like it or not we ALL worship something. You have chosen science, even
though you are unwilling to admit it. You put your trust in it, you feel
it
is the answer to life.
You have a very, very odd twist on the meaning of worship there.
This is exactly why Humpty Dumpty is mentioned so often in discussions
between Christians and atheists.
I wonder how many of the Christians who have Humpty Dumpty quoted at
them have any idea why.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: First Stars In Universe Detected!!! |
04 Nov 2005 08:26:22 PM |
|
|
brutus wrote:
"Starlord" <starlord@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:NoOdnRjOZ8aV6vbeRVn-gg@inreach.com...
Not realy, I worship NO so called GOD, it's all nothing but BS made
up by the Mind of Men to try and CONTROL other men's thinking and
actions.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Like it or not we ALL worship something. You have chosen science,
even
though you are unwilling to admit it. You put your trust in it, you
feel it is the answer to life.
No, why do you moron xians think a lie like that will
impress anybody?
You lie like that and all it does is show us you are a
weak minded idiot. is that what you are trying
to achieve?
--
The official spokesman of the Foxes said
today that investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
