Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove



 Religions > Atheism > Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "4MO4ROVE"
Date: 07 Nov 2004 06:33:55 PM
Object: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove
Four More Years Attributed to Rove's Strategy
Despite Moments of Doubt, Adviser's Planning Paid Off
By Dan Balz and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 7, 2004; Page A01
As Air Force One made its final approach to Andrews Air Force Base on
Tuesday afternoon, White House senior adviser Karl Rove juggled a
telephone, a pen and a piece of paper, anxiously copying down the
first wave of exit polls that showed President Bush trailing John F.
Kerry.
"I saw this look on his face and then the phone died," said White
House communications director Dan Bartlett. "He said, 'Not good.' " It
was, Bartlett added, "like a punch in the gut."
At that point, years of planning and preparation appeared in doubt.
Skeptics in the Democratic and Republican parties believed the
strategy created by Rove and the rest of Bush's team was about to come
crashing down.
Had that happened, it would have put Bush in the history books with
his father for having been denied a second term after achieving a 90
percent approval rating, and relegated Rove to the long list of
strategists whose theories and assumptions have been undone by the
voters.
"I was sick," Rove said in an interview as he talked about those
moments on the president's plane. "But then angry when I started
seeing the numbers. None of them made any sense."
Those exit polls, of course, turned out to be wrong, as many inside
the Bush headquarters believed once they began to examine them in
detail, and today Rove is celebrated by none other than the president
as "the architect" of the reelection victory.
Admired, disparaged, respected and feared, Rove joins an elite cadre
of political strategists who can claim two presidential victories.
Bush's adviser can now look toward the goal he has pursued since he
was an obscure direct-mail specialist in Texas: the creation of a
durable Republican majority in Washington and across the country.
Building the Base, Bit by Bit
The reelection strategy was built on the belief that with U.S. forces
in Iraq, the outcome there uncertain, and fighting terrorism still at
the forefront of Bush's presidency, Bush had to shape and win the
debate on national security and still contend with Democratic
criticism that he had ignored domestic problems.
It was also designed around a plan to increase members of the
electorate calling themselves Republicans. This has been described as
a strategy aimed almost exclusively at energizing and mobilizing the
GOP's conservative base. While social and religious conservatives
played a significant role in the outcome, Bush campaign manager Ken
Mehlman said Bush's advisers also believed they could simultaneously
"reach out to and expand the base and expand support among
ticket-splitting swing voters."
John Weaver, a strategist for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) who ended a
longtime feud with Rove this year when Bush sought McCain's help, said
Rove has moved closer to the goal of creating a Republican majority
not by seeking one big realigning election, but by recognizing that
political change often is incremental and using every election to get
a little bit closer.
"He gets three feet here, three feet there, constantly eroding the
other side and grabbing turf," Weaver said. "He has proved his point
that you can expand the base, and not just among white males, without
drifting or modifying either language or policy. I'm not sure it would
work with any other candidate, at any other time. But it worked, and
he proved the skeptics wrong."
Rove's assessment is that the 2004 election pushed the country away
from deadlock, where it had come to rest after the disputed election
four years ago. "We now clearly are not the country that was 49-49,"
he said. "We're now at 51-48 and may be trending to 51-47. It is
incremental but small, persistent change. We saw it in 2002, and we
saw it again this year. . . . It tells me we may be seeing part of a
rolling realignment."
Bush's victory is likely to enlarge the myth of Rove, with all its
layers and complexities, but the reality is that Bush's reelection was
secured not by the design or execution of a single person but by a
team.
That team included Mehlman, who executed the game plan with an
extraordinary grasp of attention to detail, and chief strategist
Matthew Dowd, who provided a stream of research on the state of the
electorate that kept pessimists at bay and the campaign focused on the
big picture rather than, as one insider put it, "chasing rabbits."
Long ago, Dowd predicted a victory margin of close to three percentage
points.
Others who played significant roles were Bartlett, Republican National
Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, campaign communications director
Nicolle Devenish, media adviser Mark McKinnon, rapid response chief
Steve Schmidt, political director Terry Nelson, vice presidential
advisers I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and Mary Matalin, and presidential
confidante Karen Hughes. Many were regular members of a breakfast
group at Rove's house where strategy was developed and great
quantities of cholesterol consumed.
No small part of the credit, of course, goes to the president, the
point man on the campaign trail and, Rove says, the one who
established the broad outlines of the reelection strategy during a
meeting with his chief adviser in December 2002 at his Texas ranch.
The president also continually prodded his team to keep the pressure
on Kerry throughout the campaign.
Rove, who turns 54 at the end of the year, has a 30-year friendship
and an unbreakable bond with Bush, the two having first met the day
before Thanksgiving 1973. Their history put Rove at the center of the
operation, serving as the link between the campaign and the White
House and between the campaign advisers and the occupant of the Oval
Office.
McKinnon once described Rove, in language of the Internet age, as
having "more bandwidth" than any political strategist he had ever
worked with, able to juggle many balls and capable of thinking
strategically while never losing sight of, or interest in, tracking
polls, voter registration data or the details of Kerry's health care
plan.
After the president's victory, Rove earned praise even from some of
those he bested. One Kerry adviser said: "I think Rove is an
incredibly bright and effective and capable guy, and they clearly won.
The last guy they need lessons from is me, who lost."
But another Democrat, still digesting a loss that seemed unlikely to
Democrats when they first saw the exit polls, called him one of the
meanest people in politics. Said Rove: "This is a town that runs on
myths. That's one of the myths. The evil Rasputin Rove. There's
nothing I can do about it. If you want to rage against the system,
blame Rove."
Still, no one suggests that Rove does not play as hard as anyone
around. GOP strategists have felt the Rove lash when they were
perceived as straying in public from 100 percent support of the
president, making them far less willing to talk openly about what they
saw as problems with the strategy when the race was in doubt.
But those in the campaign said outsiders rarely see Rove in full,
someone they say is generous in giving others credit, willing to
listen to ideas and act on them, a cheerleader in times of trouble,
able to accept mistakes and move on, and a man with a slightly goofy
side.
Reporters traveling with Bush saw that goofy side in the waning days
of the campaign. He popped into the press cabin one night wearing a
surgical mask. "Dr. Rove is here," he announced. On Halloween night,
Rove was among the most gleeful of Bush's senior staff members as they
donned camouflage jackets and paraded down the front steps of Air
Force One for cameras to poke fun at Kerry's duck-hunting foray.
Targeted GOP Recruitment
Rove said that when he and Bush first talked about a reelection
strategy in December 2002, the president, anticipating a race that
resembled 2000 in its closeness, laid out a series of requests. He
wanted a strategy designed to enlarge GOP majorities in the House and
Senate, not what he called a "lonely victory." He wanted more emphasis
on grass-roots volunteers. And he told Rove he wanted a campaign about
big things and big issues, not "mini ball," and finally said he wanted
to leave the Republican Party "stronger, broader and better."
Democrats and others often described Bush's strategy as one designed
primarily to energize and mobilize the GOP's conservative base, but
Gillespie said, "You had to have energy in your base, but your base
doesn't get you to 51 percent."
Mehlman noted that Bush increased his support among various groups:
women, Roman Catholics, Latinos (although some people question the
accuracy of the exit polls showing Bush with 44 percent of the
Hispanic vote). Even among black voters, Bush increased his support by
two percentage points.
Bush's advisers said one key to victory was the early decision to
change the composition of the electorate by finding and registering
more Republicans. "When I went to the RNC in July [2003], I asked Karl
what was the most important thing I could do, and he said, 'Close the
gap between registered Republicans and registered Democrats,' "
Gillespie said. "We registered 3.4 million voters."
Bush's team did not go about this randomly. With considerable
assistance from Dowd's research, the Bush operation sniffed out
potential voters with precision-guided accuracy, particularly in
fast-growing counties beyond the first ring of suburbs of major
cities. The campaign used computer models and demographic files to
locate probable GOP voters. "They looked at what they read, what they
watch, what they spend money on," a party official said.
Once those people were identified, the RNC sought to register them,
and the campaign used phone calls, mail and front-porch visits -- all
with a message emphasizing the issues about which they cared most --
to encourage them to turn out for Bush. "We got a homogeneous group of
new registered voters and stayed on them like dogs," another official
said.
That combination -- careful identification of potential Bush voters
and continuing contact with the help of a volunteer army that Mehlman
said numbered 1.4 million people by Election Day -- helped Bush
overcome what Democrats regard as their best-ever get-out-the-vote
operation.
Many Democrats have seized on exit polls showing that 22 percent of
voters said "moral values" were most important to them as evidence of
what brought Bush the victory. But Democratic pollster Geoffrey Garin,
in an analysis released yesterday, said he disagrees, noting that Bush
had increased his support among nonregular churchgoers more than among
churchgoers. "To focus on values misses the crucial point that this
was the post-9/11 election, and the war on terror set the stage and
the context for the choices many voters were making," Garin wrote.
'Where Real Power Is'
Rove declined to speculate on his next act. He is happily married,
dotes on his teenage son and loves Texas. "I serve at the sufferance
of the president and with the approval of my wife," he said.
But those around him expect he will stay at Bush's side for the
foreseeable future. They note that his interest in policy is as deep
as his interest in politics. "Karl sits at the intersection of
politics and policy, and that's where real power is exercised in a
White House," said a Republican official who works closely with him.
There are still many who question the Bush-Rove strategy, even after
the latest success. They say Bush's style of governing from the right,
with policies that push the conservative edge of the envelope, puts a
ceiling on his and his party's ability to expand significantly more.
Others say the Bush model will not survive after he leaves the
presidency.
But some of those doubters are chastened by what happened Tuesday. The
night before the election, one strategist, who asked for anonymity to
be free with his opinions, predicted a Kerry victory. "It's a dumb
plan," he said of the Bush campaign strategy. By midnight of election
night, as first Florida fell to Bush and then his margin in Ohio
mounted, another message arrived. It said, "On second thought . . ."
=A9 2004 The Washington Post Company=20
.

User: "The Dixie Clits"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 11 Nov 2004 06:14:34 PM
"4MO4ROVE" <rove@did.it> wrote in message
news:ECOQ0ZBD38298.7735532407@anonymous.poster...
Four More Years Attributed to Rove's Strategy
Despite Moments of Doubt, Adviser's Planning Paid Off
By Dan Balz and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 7, 2004; Page A01
As Air Force One made its final approach to Andrews Air Force Base on
Tuesday afternoon, White House senior adviser Karl Rove juggled a
telephone, a pen and a piece of paper, anxiously copying down the
first wave of exit polls that showed President Bush trailing John F.
Kerry.
"I saw this look on his face and then the phone died," said White
House communications director Dan Bartlett. "He said, 'Not good.' " It
was, Bartlett added, "like a punch in the gut."
At that point, years of planning and preparation appeared in doubt.
Skeptics in the Democratic and Republican parties believed the
strategy created by Rove and the rest of Bush's team was about to come
crashing down.
Had that happened, it would have put Bush in the history books with
his father for having been denied a second term after achieving a 90
percent approval rating, and relegated Rove to the long list of
strategists whose theories and assumptions have been undone by the
voters.
"I was sick," Rove said in an interview as he talked about those
moments on the president's plane. "But then angry when I started
seeing the numbers. None of them made any sense."
Those exit polls, of course, turned out to be wrong, as many inside
the Bush headquarters believed once they began to examine them in
detail, and today Rove is celebrated by none other than the president
as "the architect" of the reelection victory.
Admired, disparaged, respected and feared, Rove joins an elite cadre
of political strategists who can claim two presidential victories.
Bush's adviser can now look toward the goal he has pursued since he
was an obscure direct-mail specialist in Texas: the creation of a
durable Republican majority in Washington and across the country.
Building the Base, Bit by Bit
The reelection strategy was built on the belief that with U.S. forces
in Iraq, the outcome there uncertain, and fighting terrorism still at
the forefront of Bush's presidency, Bush had to shape and win the
debate on national security and still contend with Democratic
criticism that he had ignored domestic problems.
It was also designed around a plan to increase members of the
electorate calling themselves Republicans. This has been described as
a strategy aimed almost exclusively at energizing and mobilizing the
GOP's conservative base. While social and religious conservatives
played a significant role in the outcome, Bush campaign manager Ken
Mehlman said Bush's advisers also believed they could simultaneously
"reach out to and expand the base and expand support among
ticket-splitting swing voters."
John Weaver, a strategist for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) who ended a
longtime feud with Rove this year when Bush sought McCain's help, said
Rove has moved closer to the goal of creating a Republican majority
not by seeking one big realigning election, but by recognizing that
political change often is incremental and using every election to get
a little bit closer.
"He gets three feet here, three feet there, constantly eroding the
other side and grabbing turf," Weaver said. "He has proved his point
that you can expand the base, and not just among white males, without
drifting or modifying either language or policy. I'm not sure it would
work with any other candidate, at any other time. But it worked, and
he proved the skeptics wrong."
Rove's assessment is that the 2004 election pushed the country away
from deadlock, where it had come to rest after the disputed election
four years ago. "We now clearly are not the country that was 49-49,"
he said. "We're now at 51-48 and may be trending to 51-47. It is
incremental but small, persistent change. We saw it in 2002, and we
saw it again this year. . . . It tells me we may be seeing part of a
rolling realignment."
Bush's victory is likely to enlarge the myth of Rove, with all its
layers and complexities, but the reality is that Bush's reelection was
secured not by the design or execution of a single person but by a
team.
That team included Mehlman, who executed the game plan with an
extraordinary grasp of attention to detail, and chief strategist
Matthew Dowd, who provided a stream of research on the state of the
electorate that kept pessimists at bay and the campaign focused on the
big picture rather than, as one insider put it, "chasing rabbits."
Long ago, Dowd predicted a victory margin of close to three percentage
points.
Others who played significant roles were Bartlett, Republican National
Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, campaign communications director
Nicolle Devenish, media adviser Mark McKinnon, rapid response chief
Steve Schmidt, political director Terry Nelson, vice presidential
advisers I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and Mary Matalin, and presidential
confidante Karen Hughes. Many were regular members of a breakfast
group at Rove's house where strategy was developed and great
quantities of cholesterol consumed.
No small part of the credit, of course, goes to the president, the
point man on the campaign trail and, Rove says, the one who
established the broad outlines of the reelection strategy during a
meeting with his chief adviser in December 2002 at his Texas ranch.
The president also continually prodded his team to keep the pressure
on Kerry throughout the campaign.
Rove, who turns 54 at the end of the year, has a 30-year friendship
and an unbreakable bond with Bush, the two having first met the day
before Thanksgiving 1973. Their history put Rove at the center of the
operation, serving as the link between the campaign and the White
House and between the campaign advisers and the occupant of the Oval
Office.
McKinnon once described Rove, in language of the Internet age, as
having "more bandwidth" than any political strategist he had ever
worked with, able to juggle many balls and capable of thinking
strategically while never losing sight of, or interest in, tracking
polls, voter registration data or the details of Kerry's health care
plan.
After the president's victory, Rove earned praise even from some of
those he bested. One Kerry adviser said: "I think Rove is an
incredibly bright and effective and capable guy, and they clearly won.
The last guy they need lessons from is me, who lost."
But another Democrat, still digesting a loss that seemed unlikely to
Democrats when they first saw the exit polls, called him one of the
meanest people in politics. Said Rove: "This is a town that runs on
myths. That's one of the myths. The evil Rasputin Rove. There's
nothing I can do about it. If you want to rage against the system,
blame Rove."
Still, no one suggests that Rove does not play as hard as anyone
around. GOP strategists have felt the Rove lash when they were
perceived as straying in public from 100 percent support of the
president, making them far less willing to talk openly about what they
saw as problems with the strategy when the race was in doubt.
But those in the campaign said outsiders rarely see Rove in full,
someone they say is generous in giving others credit, willing to
listen to ideas and act on them, a cheerleader in times of trouble,
able to accept mistakes and move on, and a man with a slightly goofy
side.
Reporters traveling with Bush saw that goofy side in the waning days
of the campaign. He popped into the press cabin one night wearing a
surgical mask. "Dr. Rove is here," he announced. On Halloween night,
Rove was among the most gleeful of Bush's senior staff members as they
donned camouflage jackets and paraded down the front steps of Air
Force One for cameras to poke fun at Kerry's duck-hunting foray.
Targeted GOP Recruitment
Rove said that when he and Bush first talked about a reelection
strategy in December 2002, the president, anticipating a race that
resembled 2000 in its closeness, laid out a series of requests. He
wanted a strategy designed to enlarge GOP majorities in the House and
Senate, not what he called a "lonely victory." He wanted more emphasis
on grass-roots volunteers. And he told Rove he wanted a campaign about
big things and big issues, not "mini ball," and finally said he wanted
to leave the Republican Party "stronger, broader and better."
Democrats and others often described Bush's strategy as one designed
primarily to energize and mobilize the GOP's conservative base, but
Gillespie said, "You had to have energy in your base, but your base
doesn't get you to 51 percent."
Mehlman noted that Bush increased his support among various groups:
women, Roman Catholics, Latinos (although some people question the
accuracy of the exit polls showing Bush with 44 percent of the
Hispanic vote). Even among black voters, Bush increased his support by
two percentage points.
Bush's advisers said one key to victory was the early decision to
change the composition of the electorate by finding and registering
more Republicans. "When I went to the RNC in July [2003], I asked Karl
what was the most important thing I could do, and he said, 'Close the
gap between registered Republicans and registered Democrats,' "
Gillespie said. "We registered 3.4 million voters."
Bush's team did not go about this randomly. With considerable
assistance from Dowd's research, the Bush operation sniffed out
potential voters with precision-guided accuracy, particularly in
fast-growing counties beyond the first ring of suburbs of major
cities. The campaign used computer models and demographic files to
locate probable GOP voters. "They looked at what they read, what they
watch, what they spend money on," a party official said.
Once those people were identified, the RNC sought to register them,
and the campaign used phone calls, mail and front-porch visits -- all
with a message emphasizing the issues about which they cared most --
to encourage them to turn out for Bush. "We got a homogeneous group of
new registered voters and stayed on them like dogs," another official
said.
That combination -- careful identification of potential Bush voters
and continuing contact with the help of a volunteer army that Mehlman
said numbered 1.4 million people by Election Day -- helped Bush
overcome what Democrats regard as their best-ever get-out-the-vote
operation.
Many Democrats have seized on exit polls showing that 22 percent of
voters said "moral values" were most important to them as evidence of
what brought Bush the victory. But Democratic pollster Geoffrey Garin,
in an analysis released yesterday, said he disagrees, noting that Bush
had increased his support among nonregular churchgoers more than among
churchgoers. "To focus on values misses the crucial point that this
was the post-9/11 election, and the war on terror set the stage and
the context for the choices many voters were making," Garin wrote.
'Where Real Power Is'
Rove declined to speculate on his next act. He is happily married,
dotes on his teenage son and loves Texas. "I serve at the sufferance
of the president and with the approval of my wife," he said.
But those around him expect he will stay at Bush's side for the
foreseeable future. They note that his interest in policy is as deep
as his interest in politics. "Karl sits at the intersection of
politics and policy, and that's where real power is exercised in a
White House," said a Republican official who works closely with him.
There are still many who question the Bush-Rove strategy, even after
the latest success. They say Bush's style of governing from the right,
with policies that push the conservative edge of the envelope, puts a
ceiling on his and his party's ability to expand significantly more.
Others say the Bush model will not survive after he leaves the
presidency.
But some of those doubters are chastened by what happened Tuesday. The
night before the election, one strategist, who asked for anonymity to
be free with his opinions, predicted a Kerry victory. "It's a dumb
plan," he said of the Bush campaign strategy. By midnight of election
night, as first Florida fell to Bush and then his margin in Ohio
mounted, another message arrived. It said, "On second thought . . ."
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
=====================================
I'm beginning to think Bush and Rove have been riding the hershey highway
for a loooong time......
.
User: "Matty"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 13 Nov 2004 06:27:34 AM
On 2004-11-12 11:14:34 +1100, "The Dixie Clits"
<wehatebush@dixieclits.com> said:

"4MO4ROVE" <rove@did.it> wrote in message
news:ECOQ0ZBD38298.7735532407@anonymous.poster...
Four More Years Attributed to Rove's Strategy
Despite Moments of Doubt, Adviser's Planning Paid Off

By Dan Balz and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 7, 2004; Page A01

As Air Force One made its final approach to Andrews Air Force Base on
Tuesday afternoon, White House senior adviser Karl Rove juggled a
telephone, a pen and a piece of paper, anxiously copying down the
first wave of exit polls that showed President Bush trailing John F.
Kerry.

"I saw this look on his face and then the phone died," said White
House communications director Dan Bartlett. "He said, 'Not good.' " It
was, Bartlett added, "like a punch in the gut."

At that point, years of planning and preparation appeared in doubt.
Skeptics in the Democratic and Republican parties believed the
strategy created by Rove and the rest of Bush's team was about to come
crashing down.

Had that happened, it would have put Bush in the history books with
his father for having been denied a second term after achieving a 90
percent approval rating, and relegated Rove to the long list of
strategists whose theories and assumptions have been undone by the
voters.

"I was sick," Rove said in an interview as he talked about those
moments on the president's plane. "But then angry when I started
seeing the numbers. None of them made any sense."

Those exit polls, of course, turned out to be wrong, as many inside
the Bush headquarters believed once they began to examine them in
detail, and today Rove is celebrated by none other than the president
as "the architect" of the reelection victory.

Admired, disparaged, respected and feared, Rove joins an elite cadre
of political strategists who can claim two presidential victories.
Bush's adviser can now look toward the goal he has pursued since he
was an obscure direct-mail specialist in Texas: the creation of a
durable Republican majority in Washington and across the country.
Building the Base, Bit by Bit

The reelection strategy was built on the belief that with U.S. forces
in Iraq, the outcome there uncertain, and fighting terrorism still at
the forefront of Bush's presidency, Bush had to shape and win the
debate on national security and still contend with Democratic
criticism that he had ignored domestic problems.

It was also designed around a plan to increase members of the
electorate calling themselves Republicans. This has been described as
a strategy aimed almost exclusively at energizing and mobilizing the
GOP's conservative base. While social and religious conservatives
played a significant role in the outcome, Bush campaign manager Ken
Mehlman said Bush's advisers also believed they could simultaneously
"reach out to and expand the base and expand support among
ticket-splitting swing voters."

John Weaver, a strategist for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) who ended a
longtime feud with Rove this year when Bush sought McCain's help, said
Rove has moved closer to the goal of creating a Republican majority
not by seeking one big realigning election, but by recognizing that
political change often is incremental and using every election to get
a little bit closer.

"He gets three feet here, three feet there, constantly eroding the
other side and grabbing turf," Weaver said. "He has proved his point
that you can expand the base, and not just among white males, without
drifting or modifying either language or policy. I'm not sure it would
work with any other candidate, at any other time. But it worked, and
he proved the skeptics wrong."

Rove's assessment is that the 2004 election pushed the country away
from deadlock, where it had come to rest after the disputed election
four years ago. "We now clearly are not the country that was 49-49,"
he said. "We're now at 51-48 and may be trending to 51-47. It is
incremental but small, persistent change. We saw it in 2002, and we
saw it again this year. . . . It tells me we may be seeing part of a
rolling realignment."

Bush's victory is likely to enlarge the myth of Rove, with all its
layers and complexities, but the reality is that Bush's reelection was
secured not by the design or execution of a single person but by a
team.

That team included Mehlman, who executed the game plan with an
extraordinary grasp of attention to detail, and chief strategist
Matthew Dowd, who provided a stream of research on the state of the
electorate that kept pessimists at bay and the campaign focused on the
big picture rather than, as one insider put it, "chasing rabbits."
Long ago, Dowd predicted a victory margin of close to three percentage
points.

Others who played significant roles were Bartlett, Republican National
Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, campaign communications director
Nicolle Devenish, media adviser Mark McKinnon, rapid response chief
Steve Schmidt, political director Terry Nelson, vice presidential
advisers I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and Mary Matalin, and presidential
confidante Karen Hughes. Many were regular members of a breakfast
group at Rove's house where strategy was developed and great
quantities of cholesterol consumed.

No small part of the credit, of course, goes to the president, the
point man on the campaign trail and, Rove says, the one who
established the broad outlines of the reelection strategy during a
meeting with his chief adviser in December 2002 at his Texas ranch.
The president also continually prodded his team to keep the pressure
on Kerry throughout the campaign.

Rove, who turns 54 at the end of the year, has a 30-year friendship
and an unbreakable bond with Bush, the two having first met the day
before Thanksgiving 1973. Their history put Rove at the center of the
operation, serving as the link between the campaign and the White
House and between the campaign advisers and the occupant of the Oval
Office.

McKinnon once described Rove, in language of the Internet age, as
having "more bandwidth" than any political strategist he had ever
worked with, able to juggle many balls and capable of thinking
strategically while never losing sight of, or interest in, tracking
polls, voter registration data or the details of Kerry's health care
plan.

After the president's victory, Rove earned praise even from some of
those he bested. One Kerry adviser said: "I think Rove is an
incredibly bright and effective and capable guy, and they clearly won.
The last guy they need lessons from is me, who lost."

But another Democrat, still digesting a loss that seemed unlikely to
Democrats when they first saw the exit polls, called him one of the
meanest people in politics. Said Rove: "This is a town that runs on
myths. That's one of the myths. The evil Rasputin Rove. There's
nothing I can do about it. If you want to rage against the system,
blame Rove."

Still, no one suggests that Rove does not play as hard as anyone
around. GOP strategists have felt the Rove lash when they were
perceived as straying in public from 100 percent support of the
president, making them far less willing to talk openly about what they
saw as problems with the strategy when the race was in doubt.

But those in the campaign said outsiders rarely see Rove in full,
someone they say is generous in giving others credit, willing to
listen to ideas and act on them, a cheerleader in times of trouble,
able to accept mistakes and move on, and a man with a slightly goofy
side.

Reporters traveling with Bush saw that goofy side in the waning days
of the campaign. He popped into the press cabin one night wearing a
surgical mask. "Dr. Rove is here," he announced. On Halloween night,
Rove was among the most gleeful of Bush's senior staff members as they
donned camouflage jackets and paraded down the front steps of Air
Force One for cameras to poke fun at Kerry's duck-hunting foray.
Targeted GOP Recruitment

Rove said that when he and Bush first talked about a reelection
strategy in December 2002, the president, anticipating a race that
resembled 2000 in its closeness, laid out a series of requests. He
wanted a strategy designed to enlarge GOP majorities in the House and
Senate, not what he called a "lonely victory." He wanted more emphasis
on grass-roots volunteers. And he told Rove he wanted a campaign about
big things and big issues, not "mini ball," and finally said he wanted
to leave the Republican Party "stronger, broader and better."

Democrats and others often described Bush's strategy as one designed
primarily to energize and mobilize the GOP's conservative base, but
Gillespie said, "You had to have energy in your base, but your base
doesn't get you to 51 percent."

Mehlman noted that Bush increased his support among various groups:
women, Roman Catholics, Latinos (although some people question the
accuracy of the exit polls showing Bush with 44 percent of the
Hispanic vote). Even among black voters, Bush increased his support by
two percentage points.

Bush's advisers said one key to victory was the early decision to
change the composition of the electorate by finding and registering
more Republicans. "When I went to the RNC in July [2003], I asked Karl
what was the most important thing I could do, and he said, 'Close the
gap between registered Republicans and registered Democrats,' "
Gillespie said. "We registered 3.4 million voters."

Bush's team did not go about this randomly. With considerable
assistance from Dowd's research, the Bush operation sniffed out
potential voters with precision-guided accuracy, particularly in
fast-growing counties beyond the first ring of suburbs of major
cities. The campaign used computer models and demographic files to
locate probable GOP voters. "They looked at what they read, what they
watch, what they spend money on," a party official said.

Once those people were identified, the RNC sought to register them,
and the campaign used phone calls, mail and front-porch visits -- all
with a message emphasizing the issues about which they cared most --
to encourage them to turn out for Bush. "We got a homogeneous group of
new registered voters and stayed on them like dogs," another official
said.

That combination -- careful identification of potential Bush voters
and continuing contact with the help of a volunteer army that Mehlman
said numbered 1.4 million people by Election Day -- helped Bush
overcome what Democrats regard as their best-ever get-out-the-vote
operation.

Many Democrats have seized on exit polls showing that 22 percent of
voters said "moral values" were most important to them as evidence of
what brought Bush the victory. But Democratic pollster Geoffrey Garin,
in an analysis released yesterday, said he disagrees, noting that Bush
had increased his support among nonregular churchgoers more than among
churchgoers. "To focus on values misses the crucial point that this
was the post-9/11 election, and the war on terror set the stage and
the context for the choices many voters were making," Garin wrote.
'Where Real Power Is'

Rove declined to speculate on his next act. He is happily married,
dotes on his teenage son and loves Texas. "I serve at the sufferance
of the president and with the approval of my wife," he said.

But those around him expect he will stay at Bush's side for the
foreseeable future. They note that his interest in policy is as deep
as his interest in politics. "Karl sits at the intersection of
politics and policy, and that's where real power is exercised in a
White House," said a Republican official who works closely with him.

There are still many who question the Bush-Rove strategy, even after
the latest success. They say Bush's style of governing from the right,
with policies that push the conservative edge of the envelope, puts a
ceiling on his and his party's ability to expand significantly more.
Others say the Bush model will not survive after he leaves the
presidency.

But some of those doubters are chastened by what happened Tuesday. The
night before the election, one strategist, who asked for anonymity to
be free with his opinions, predicted a Kerry victory. "It's a dumb
plan," he said of the Bush campaign strategy. By midnight of election
night, as first Florida fell to Bush and then his margin in Ohio
mounted, another message arrived. It said, "On second thought . . ."

� 2004 The Washington Post Company

=====================================

I'm beginning to think Bush and Rove have been riding the hershey
highway for a loooong time......

Listen to all the back patting at the Republican Party, given half a
chance, if all the cameras were to leave there would be a right old
orgy.
Matty
--
"If a nation could not prosper without the enjoyment of perfect liberty
and perfect justice, there is not in the world a nation which could
ever have prospered." - The Wealth of Nations, Book IV, Chapter IX
"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this
world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or
all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of
government except all those other forms that have been tried from time
to time." - Sir Winston Churchill, Hansard, November 11, 1947
.


User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 07 Nov 2004 10:47:51 PM
On 8 Nov 2004 00:33:55 -0000, 4MO4ROVE <rove@did.it> said in
alt.atheism:

Four More Years Attributed to Rove's Strategy
Despite Moments of Doubt, Adviser's Planning Paid Off

Why would anyone be interested in a 240 line plagiarism of a newspaper
article we can read elsewhere if we want? At least summarize it.
--
"Christians, it is needless to say, utterly detest each other. They slander each
other constantly with the vilest forms of abuse and cannot come to any sort of
agreement in their teachings. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its own
with deceitful nonsense, and makes perfect little pigs of those it wins over to its
side."
- Celsus On the True Doctrine, translated by R. Joseph Hoffman, Oxford University Press, 1987
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
User: "Stuart Warren"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 12 Nov 2004 04:09:41 AM
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vhuto0t6fgdqfeopqj4nvnrnj13dl9phb5@4ax.com...

Why would anyone be interested in a 240 line plagiarism of a newspaper
article we can read elsewhere if we want? At least summarize it.

Isn't it only plagarism when it doesn't list the authors/source and original
copyright info?
Stuart Warren
.
User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 14 Nov 2004 08:30:02 PM
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:09:41 -0600, "Stuart Warren"
<email@somewhere.com> said in alt.atheism:

"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vhuto0t6fgdqfeopqj4nvnrnj13dl9phb5@4ax.com...

Why would anyone be interested in a 240 line plagiarism of a newspaper
article we can read elsewhere if we want? At least summarize it.

Isn't it only plagarism when it doesn't list the authors/source and original
copyright info?

Yes. Listing it all without written permission is "merely" a
copyright violation.
I didn't read the entire post. Was there an attribution in it
somewhere?
--
"Christians, it is needless to say, utterly detest each other. They slander each
other constantly with the vilest forms of abuse and cannot come to any sort of
agreement in their teachings. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its own
with deceitful nonsense, and makes perfect little pigs of those it wins over to its
side."
- Celsus On the True Doctrine, translated by R. Joseph Hoffman, Oxford University Press, 1987
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.

User: "Tukla Ratte"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 12 Nov 2004 12:11:42 PM
Stuart Warren wrote:

"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vhuto0t6fgdqfeopqj4nvnrnj13dl9phb5@4ax.com...

Why would anyone be interested in a 240 line plagiarism of a newspaper
article we can read elsewhere if we want? At least summarize it.



Isn't it only plagarism when it doesn't list the authors/source and original
copyright info?

I think you're right, but I also think that posting the entire article
is a copyright violation.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.


User: "duke"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 08 Nov 2004 05:18:16 PM
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 04:47:51 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:

On 8 Nov 2004 00:33:55 -0000, 4MO4ROVE <rove@did.it> said in
alt.atheism:

Four More Years Attributed to Rove's Strategy
Despite Moments of Doubt, Adviser's Planning Paid Off


Why would anyone be interested in a 240 line plagiarism of a newspaper
article we can read elsewhere if we want? At least summarize it.

That's all most people do in this ng anyway.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "Stuart Warren"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 12 Nov 2004 04:08:37 AM
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:alvvo01flc8504ld3el5sibjsb8slukav5@4ax.com...

That's all most people do in this ng anyway.

LOL! At least it was from a national newspaper, half of this stuff is just
from someone's favorite hardcore but clueless liberal/conservative blogger.
Stuart Warren
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 13 Nov 2004 10:16:15 AM
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:08:37 -0600, "Stuart Warren" <email@somewhere.com> wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:alvvo01flc8504ld3el5sibjsb8slukav5@4ax.com...

That's all most people do in this ng anyway.


LOL! At least it was from a national newspaper, half of this stuff is just
from someone's favorite hardcore but clueless liberal/conservative blogger.

Stuart Warren

Isn't that the truth. Maff is a good example.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "maff"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 14 Nov 2004 04:07:46 AM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<upccp0dgse1n6uj2sc7rim9ophch98k78r@4ax.com>...

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:08:37 -0600, "Stuart Warren" <email@somewhere.com> wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:alvvo01flc8504ld3el5sibjsb8slukav5@4ax.com...

That's all most people do in this ng anyway.


LOL! At least it was from a national newspaper, half of this stuff is just
from someone's favorite hardcore but clueless liberal/conservative blogger.

Stuart Warren


Isn't that the truth. Maff is a good example.

Are you going to sacrifice your life and money for the Confederacy and
Christian fundadamentism, Confederate Christian fascist scum?




duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****

.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 14 Nov 2004 08:54:09 AM
On 14 Nov 2004 02:07:46 -0800,
(maff) wrote:

LOL! At least it was from a national newspaper, half of this stuff is just
from someone's favorite hardcore but clueless liberal/conservative blogger.


Isn't that the truth. Maff is a good example.

Are you going to sacrifice your life and money for the Confederacy and
Christian fundadamentism, Confederate Christian fascist scum?

Have you ever posted an original thread in your life?
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "maff"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 14 Nov 2004 05:02:08 PM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<sasep0d2civn731odtk1ii414ivd0v7ih4@4ax.com>...

On 14 Nov 2004 02:07:46 -0800,

(maff) wrote:

LOL! At least it was from a national newspaper, half of this stuff is just
from someone's favorite hardcore but clueless liberal/conservative blogger.


Isn't that the truth. Maff is a good example.


Are you going to sacrifice your life and money for the Confederacy and
Christian fundadamentism, Confederate Christian fascist scum?


Have you ever posted an original thread in your life?

I thought Confederates were busy with slaving and other criminal
activities, Christian fascist scum.


duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****

.





User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 08 Nov 2004 10:00:28 PM
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:18:16 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> said in
alt.atheism:

On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 04:47:51 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:

Why would anyone be interested in a 240 line plagiarism of a newspaper
article we can read elsewhere if we want? At least summarize it.

That's all most people do in this ng anyway.

That, or make stupid remarks.
Oh, hiya, Earl.
--
"Christians, it is needless to say, utterly detest each other. They slander each
other constantly with the vilest forms of abuse and cannot come to any sort of
agreement in their teachings. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its own
with deceitful nonsense, and makes perfect little pigs of those it wins over to its
side."
- Celsus On the True Doctrine, translated by R. Joseph Hoffman, Oxford University Press, 1987
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 13 Nov 2004 10:15:41 AM
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 04:00:28 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:

That's all most people do in this ng anyway.

That, or make stupid remarks.

Then why do you do that?

Oh, hiya, Earl.

Ready for more new lessons?
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Four More Years: Thank Karl Rove 14 Nov 2004 08:28:25 PM
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:15:41 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> said in
alt.atheism:

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 04:00:28 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:

That's all most people do in this ng anyway.


That, or make stupid remarks.


Then why do you do that?

Oh, hiya, Earl.


Ready for more new lessons?

Look up, Earl.
--
"Christians, it is needless to say, utterly detest each other. They slander each
other constantly with the vilest forms of abuse and cannot come to any sort of
agreement in their teachings. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its own
with deceitful nonsense, and makes perfect little pigs of those it wins over to its
side."
- Celsus On the True Doctrine, translated by R. Joseph Hoffman, Oxford University Press, 1987
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Liberals Resurrect Karl Marx!! LIBERALS HATE AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Regular GOP Voters Turned Off by Smearboat Lies Part I (Keep It Up Karl Rove!)
Even With Wires From Karl Rove, AWOL Can't String Two Coherent Thoughts Together
Karl Rove, Savior of the unborn
911 Family to Karl Rove: Don't Invoke Our Loved Ones For Your Political Gain!
Vet Whose Brother Was on Site at the Pentagon After 9/11: We Served. How About You, Karl?
Karl Rove exposed as Bush traitor
OT: Karl Rove's America
Republicans Speak Out On Karl Rove
GOP Senators Puts Karl Rove Before National Security
Karl Rove's Own Lawyer Calls Karl Rove a Liar
Oops, NeoCon "Stephen" Caught in a Lie As He Sucks Karl Rove's *****
Katrina Reconstruction to be Headed by... Karl Rove! (GOP, Party of Treason)
Re: LIBERALS PROVE THAT THEY ARE INSANE IDIOTS ==> Joseph Kenndy loved Hitler <-- ***** (GOP and Karl Rove: the American TREASON party)
Karl Rove AWOL During Recent WH Photo Ops (Indictment Cometh?)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER