"Fred" and fester were RIGHT!



 Religions > Atheism > "Fred" and fester were RIGHT!

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "JTEM"
Date: 27 Feb 2007 08:46:25 PM
Object: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT!
The DJIA grew over 200% under Clinton, but under
Bush it's already grown something like 20%.
And even if real growth, after inflation, amounts to
squat, it's still difficult to argue with the great
success which is Bush's economic policies....
The huge deficits... their pressure on interest rates...
the inflation they caused... they certainly paid off!
So what if they only benefited the wealthy? The
rest of us indirectly benefited from all that patented
Robust Economic Growth(tm).
Throughout the annals of human history there have
been but two measures of great leadership, and they
are:
#1. Peace
#2. Prosperity
I dare anyone to claim that Bush has failed to deliver
on both...
.

User: "jem"

Title: Re: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT! 28 Feb 2007 03:29:17 PM
On 27 Feb 2007 18:46:25 -0800, "JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:


The DJIA grew over 200% under Clinton, but under
Bush it's already grown something like 20%.

And even if real growth, after inflation, amounts to
squat, it's still difficult to argue with the great
success which is Bush's economic policies....

The huge deficits... their pressure on interest rates...
the inflation they caused... they certainly paid off!
So what if they only benefited the wealthy? The
rest of us indirectly benefited from all that patented
Robust Economic Growth(tm).

Throughout the annals of human history there have
been but two measures of great leadership, and they
are:

#1. Peace

#2. Prosperity

I dare anyone to claim that Bush has failed to deliver
on both...

Absolutely fucking stupid statement.
Ask your average Iraqi about that peacenik bush.
Ask the 20-something thousand seriously wounded young vets we have
now, ask the families of over 3 thousand DEAD American soldiers, for a
fucking war that never should have happened. Bush is a pox on us all,
along with his puppeteers pulling his strings.
Going from the largest surplus in history to the largest deficit in
history, ya real prosperity there dumbass. The shrinking middle class
with jack-***** for medical coverage, and dwindling savings, ask them
how prosperous we are as a whole.
To be far right-winger, you need to be one of two things, very rich,
or a brainwashed athoritarian idiot.
My guess is you are not very rich.
.
User: "Brian E. Clark"

Title: Re: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT! 01 Mar 2007 10:12:38 AM
In article <tesbu2tdm5df744gd1mvl48kurg5tpamuc@4ax.com>,
jem said...

I dare anyone to claim that Bush has failed to deliver
on both...


Absolutely fucking stupid statement.
Ask your average Iraqi about that peacenik bush.

I think you failed to notice the sardonic undercurrent in
jtem's postings. There is a venerated species of sarcasm
labeled "damning with faint praise." The quintiessential
example runs something like this:
Q: "Is Tammy's boyfriend handsome?"
A: "Well, he's not *ugly*..."
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
User: "jem"

Title: Re: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT! 03 Mar 2007 03:02:07 AM
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:12:38 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:

In article <tesbu2tdm5df744gd1mvl48kurg5tpamuc@4ax.com>,
jem said...

I dare anyone to claim that Bush has failed to deliver
on both...


Absolutely fucking stupid statement.
Ask your average Iraqi about that peacenik bush.


I think you failed to notice the sardonic undercurrent in
jtem's postings. There is a venerated species of sarcasm
labeled "damning with faint praise." The quintiessential
example runs something like this:

Q: "Is Tammy's boyfriend handsome?"
A: "Well, he's not *ugly*..."

Point taken, I was dumber than a bag of broken hammers.
The little rant was misdirected, in spirit it was meant to counter
bushco blind supporters. I apologize for shooting at the messenger and
not the message. I'm getting so fed up with this administration and
their Orwellian *****. It is *ugly*
.


User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT! 01 Mar 2007 02:12:19 AM
jem <A0054...@airmail.net> wrote:

Absolutely fucking stupid statement.

No, seriously, what do you really think?
.
User: "jem"

Title: Re: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT! 03 Mar 2007 03:29:33 AM
On 1 Mar 2007 00:12:19 -0800, "JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:


jem <A0054...@airmail.net> wrote:

Absolutely fucking stupid statement.


No, seriously, what do you really think?

I think I should have read it with my brain in gear, Mr. Clark pointed
that out for me. I scanned it too fast & shot off my big mouth. The
target of my rant is the same target I believe you had.
Unbelievably, bushco will retain something like 22% support no matter
how damaging his actions are, he could lead them into a burning
building telling them it's chilly inside, and they would all shiver as
their parkas burned off their bodies.
Those are are largely the same people that believe in creationism and
many other fantasies, because their athority figures say so. They were
my intended targets. So I stand by what I said, but not how I
delivered it.
They are pretty much impervious to criticism, but it sure makes me
feel better bitching at them.
.



User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT! 28 Feb 2007 12:56:40 AM
On 27 Feb 2007 18:46:25 -0800, "JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:


The DJIA grew over 200% under Clinton, but under
Bush it's already grown something like 20%.

And even if real growth, after inflation, amounts to
squat, it's still difficult to argue with the great
success which is Bush's economic policies....

The huge deficits... their pressure on interest rates...
the inflation they caused... they certainly paid off!
So what if they only benefited the wealthy? The
rest of us indirectly benefited from all that patented
Robust Economic Growth(tm).

Throughout the annals of human history there have
been but two measures of great leadership, and they
are:

#1. Peace

#2. Prosperity

I dare anyone to claim that Bush has failed to deliver
on both...

You *are* joking, right?
.
User: ""

Title: Re: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT! 28 Feb 2007 08:37:44 AM
On Feb 28, 1:56 am, John Baker <n...@bizniz.net> wrote:

On 27 Feb 2007 18:46:25 -0800, "JTEM" <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:





The DJIA grew over 200% under Clinton, but under
Bush it's already grown something like 20%.


And even if real growth, after inflation, amounts to
squat, it's still difficult to argue with the great
success which is Bush's economic policies....


The huge deficits... their pressure on interest rates...
the inflation they caused... they certainly paid off!
So what if they only benefited the wealthy? The
rest of us indirectly benefited from all that patented
Robust Economic Growth(tm).


Throughout the annals of human history there have
been but two measures of great leadership, and they
are:


#1. Peace


#2. Prosperity


I dare anyone to claim that Bush has failed to deliver
on both...


You *are* joking, right?

http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/21/markets/election_demsvreps/
But here's Wall Street's strange little irony -- studies show the
stock market performs better and tends to be less volatile when
Democrats are in power.
This discrepancy was explored recently in a study by two finance
professors at the University of California at Los Angeles, Pedro Santa-
Clara and Rossen Valkanov.
.


User: ""

Title: Re: "Fred" and fester were RIGHT! 28 Feb 2007 12:49:17 AM
On Feb 28, 9:46 am, "JTEM" <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:

The DJIA grew over 200% under Clinton, but under
Bush it's already grown something like 20%.

And even if real growth, after inflation, amounts to
squat, it's still difficult to argue with the great
success which is Bush's economic policies....

The huge deficits... their pressure on interest rates...
the inflation they caused... they certainly paid off!
So what if they only benefited the wealthy? The
rest of us indirectly benefited from all that patented
Robust Economic Growth(tm).

Throughout the annals of human history there have
been but two measures of great leadership, and they
are:

#1. Peace

#2. Prosperity

I dare anyone to claim that Bush has failed to deliver
on both...

Would have been funny if it wasn't so serious.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
You Atheists were right and I was wrong
OT: We were right to invade Iraq
Why were the thorns of Christ imprinted onto my right arm?
Would you believe in Jesus if the thorns of christ were imprintedonto your right arm?
OT: War Foes Were Right
OT: Were Sanctions Right?
left right liberal conservative and in between
Infidel guy on "Real Truth" radio right now
Talking Fish Predicted End Of the World - Was It Right ?
Re: Today's Founder Quote: States have every right to honor God within their public places
If Thy Right Eye Offend Thee
Hanoi John Kerry MUST be Kidding, right???????
OT: What's Right and What's Left to Say on the Political Divide
"The Manchurian Candidate" director Jonathan Demme, "This is a movie about political brainwashing, and we're right back there again now"
America, Your God Drew Near Right There Above Atlanta
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER