| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
21 Apr 2006 07:35:07 PM |
| Object: |
Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/20/AR2006042001351.html
Rove's New Mission: Survival
By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Friday, April 21, 2006; Page A23
Here's the real meaning of the White House shake-up and the redefinition of
Karl Rove's role in the Bush presidency: The administration's one and only
domestic priority in 2006 is hanging on to control of Congress.
That, in turn, means that all the spin about Rove's power being diminished
is simply wrong. Yes, Rove is giving up some policy responsibilities to
concentrate on politics, but guess what: The possibility of President Bush's
winning enactment of any major new policy initiative this year is zero. Rove
is simply moving to where all the action will, of necessity, be.
As one outside adviser to the administration said, the danger of a
Democratic takeover of at least one house of Congress looms large and would
carry huge penalties for Bush. The administration fears "investigations of
everything" by congressional committees, this adviser said, and the
"possibility of a forced withdrawal from Iraq" through legislative action.
"I don't think they see much chance of accomplishing anything this year,"
said this Republican strategist, who preferred not to be quoted by name.
"The bulk of their agenda, let's say, has been put on hold."
Rove never stopped being political, even when he had formal responsibility
for policy. What's intriguing about the shift in the direction of Rove's
energies is that it marks a turn from the high politics of a partisan
realignment driven by ideas and policies to the more mundane politics of
eking out votes, seat by seat and state by state. Most of Rove's grander
dreams have died as the president's poll numbers have come crashing down.
It's forgotten that the president's proposal to privatize part of Social
Security was not primarily about creating solvency in the system, since the
creation of private accounts would have aggravated deficits for a
significant period. It was part of a larger effort to reorganize government
and bring the New Deal era to a definitive close.
The president's "ownership society" was a political project designed to
increase Americans' reliance on private markets for their retirements and,
over the longer run, on their own resources for health coverage. The idea
was that broadening the "investor class," a totemic phrase among tax-cutting
conservatives, would change the economic basis of politics -- and create
more Republicans.
The collapse of the Social Security initiative was thus more than a policy
failure. It was a decisive political defeat that left Bush and Rove with no
fallback ideas around which to organize domestic policy. And just as the
growing unpopularity of the war in Vietnam after 1966 forced Lyndon Johnson
to abandon his Great Society programs -- partly because of large GOP gains
in Congress during that year's midterm elections -- opposition to the Iraq
war is undercutting Bush's effort to create a kind of Great
Society-in-reverse.
The Democrats had such large congressional margins in 1966 that they could
suffer major losses and still maintain at least nominal control of both
houses. But Republican congressional margins are thin, particularly in the
House, where a shift of 15 seats would make Democrat Nancy Pelosi the
speaker.
And the possibility of a Democratic tide that might sweep in second- or
third-tier challengers is no longer mere fantasy talk among liberals at
cocktail parties. It is a genuine Republican fear. According to figures from
state polls published this week by SurveyUSA, Bush has an approval rating
above 50 percent in just four states -- Utah, Idaho, Wyoming and Nebraska.
His disapproval rating is 60 percent or higher in such key battlegrounds as
Virginia, Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, Colorado, New Mexico, Iowa, Ohio,
Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
The Virginia numbers from a survey earlier this month -- 37 percent approval
for Bush, 60 percent disapproval -- are particularly intriguing. Democrats
are beginning to think that Sen. George Allen, who is up for reelection this
year and considering a run at the presidency in 2008, may be vulnerable.
Democrats already see Republican seats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Missouri,
Montana, Tennessee, Rhode Island and Arizona as reasonable targets. While a
Democratic takeover of the Senate is still a long shot, it is no longer a
preposterous idea.
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on the
Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing
state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Michelle: No Thanks, Too Many Skidmarks |
21 Apr 2006 08:26:32 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in
news:r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/04/20/AR20060
42001351.html
Rove's New Mission: Survival
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/21/mollohan.ap/index.html
Senior Democrat on House ethics committee stepping down
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The top Democrat on the House ethics committee, Alan
Mollohan, will leave the panel -- at least temporarily -- while he
defends his own financial conduct, Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said
Friday.
Mollohan's decision comes in an election year when his party is accusing
majority Republicans of allowing a "culture of corruption" in Congress.
Mollohan, of West Virginia, will be replaced by Rep. Howard Berman of
California, a former ranking Democrat on the panel. Mollohan has denied
any wrongdoing.
{{{{{{}}}}}}
And now the *sensitive *emotional types among the democrats will start
to cry about being "swiftboated". Aww.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/953/472/1600/democratic_sealsmall.jpg
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Master of Orion 3 lives!
Patch 1.2.5 - http://moo3.quicksilver.com/official/patch071803.html
Strawberry Mod - http://www.moo3.at/mods/link.php?id=142
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Michelle: No Thanks, Too Many Skidmarks |
21 Apr 2006 09:57:02 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:26:32 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in
news:r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/04/20/AR20060
42001351.html
Rove's New Mission: Survival
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/21/mollohan.ap/index.html
Senior Democrat on House ethics committee stepping down
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The top Democrat on the House ethics committee, Alan
Mollohan, will leave the panel -- at least temporarily -- while he
defends his own financial conduct, Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said
Friday.
Mollohan's decision comes in an election year when his party is accusing
majority Republicans of allowing a "culture of corruption" in Congress.
Mollohan, of West Virginia, will be replaced by Rep. Howard Berman of
California, a former ranking Democrat on the panel. Mollohan has denied
any wrongdoing.
{{{{{{}}}}}}
And now the *sensitive *emotional types among the democrats will start
to cry about being "swiftboated". Aww.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/953/472/1600/democratic_sealsmall.jpg
LOL Freddy. Your boy is going down as the absolute worst president in
the history of this country. The historians are so sure, they aren't
even waiting for the ink to dry on his horrifying siege to this
country.
Must suck to be you. Not that you seem to be able to tell. Next
lifetime - don't ***** up your head so bad.
One democrat - that actually stepped down from his post instead of
having the law rewritten - not that there's been any thing other than
a lot of hot air from a lot of red face repugicans trying desperately
to keep attention from the overwhelming corruption that stinks in
their party. And that's the best you can do in defence of the worst
president ever.
Poor boy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Michelle: No Thanks, Too Many Skidmarks |
21 Apr 2006 10:24:54 PM |
|
|
(Kate ) wrote in
news:444a99e3.3996453@news-west.newscene.com:
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:26:32 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in
news:r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/04/20/AR20060
42001351.html
Rove's New Mission: Survival
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/21/mollohan.ap/index.html
Senior Democrat on House ethics committee stepping down
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The top Democrat on the House ethics committee,
Alan Mollohan, will leave the panel -- at least temporarily -- while
he defends his own financial conduct, Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi
said Friday.
Mollohan's decision comes in an election year when his party is
accusing majority Republicans of allowing a "culture of corruption" in
Congress.
Mollohan, of West Virginia, will be replaced by Rep. Howard Berman of
California, a former ranking Democrat on the panel. Mollohan has
denied any wrongdoing.
{{{{{{}}}}}}
And now the *sensitive *emotional types among the democrats will start
to cry about being "swiftboated". Aww.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/953/472/1600/democratic_sealsmall.jp
g
LOL Freddy. Your boy is going down as the absolute worst president in
the history of this country. The historians are so sure, they aren't
even waiting for the ink to dry on his horrifying siege to this
country.
Those aren't historians, darlin. Those are has-been reporters who see
their own reputations going down the tubes faster than the stock values
of their corporate press companies.
Must suck to be you. Not that you seem to be able to tell. Next
lifetime - don't ***** up your head so bad.
At least I take my meds, deary. What's your excuse?
One democrat - that actually stepped down from his post instead of
having the law rewritten - not that there's been any thing other than
a lot of hot air from a lot of red face repugicans trying desperately
to keep attention from the overwhelming corruption that stinks in
their party. And that's the best you can do in defence of the worst
president ever.
Poor boy.
Oh, he's just the latest in a long series. And there'll be plenty more
where he came from. Drip drip drip all summer long. You think the
culture of corruption stops with Republicans? Get real, Katie. Your
media pals can't stop the Repubs from getting the word out on corrupt
Democrats this time around.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Master of Orion 3 lives!
Patch 1.2.5 - http://moo3.quicksilver.com/official/patch071803.html
Strawberry Mod - http://www.moo3.at/mods/link.php?id=142
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Michelle: No Thanks, Too Many Skidmarks |
22 Apr 2006 07:33:54 AM |
|
|
On 21 Apr 2006 21:57:02 -0500, (Kate ) wrote:
LOL Freddy. Your boy is going down as the absolute worst president in
the history of this country. The historians are so sure, they aren't
even waiting for the ink to dry on his horrifying siege to this
country.
Popularity and best president don't go hand in hand. rat willie was popular
because he make decisions intended to make him popular, rather than what was
good for the county.
Thank you, President Bush.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Michelle: No Thanks, Too Many Skidmarks |
22 Apr 2006 02:08:31 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On 21 Apr 2006 21:57:02 -0500, (Kate ) wrote:
LOL Freddy. Your boy is going down as the absolute worst president in
the history of this country. The historians are so sure, they aren't
even waiting for the ink to dry on his horrifying siege to this
country.
Popularity and best president don't go hand in hand. rat willie was popular
because he make decisions intended to make him popular, rather than what was
good for the county.
"Good for the country" and what Clinton did was hand-in-hand. As
evidnece: The reduction of the unemployment rate, the raising of job
numbers, the fact that we never were attacked for which the perpetrator
was never caught and prosecuted, the fact that mulitple terrorist
attacks have been thwarted, the reduction (to the point of surplus) our
debt and deficits...
Thank you, President Bush.
....for taking us towards theocratic rule?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Michelle: No Thanks, Too Many Skidmarks |
23 Apr 2006 06:28:00 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:08:31 -0700, DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
"Good for the country" and what Clinton did was hand-in-hand. As
evidnece: The reduction of the unemployment rate, the raising of job
numbers, the fact that we never were attacked for which the perpetrator
was never caught and prosecuted, the fact that mulitple terrorist
attacks have been thwarted, the reduction (to the point of surplus) our
debt and deficits...
1. 'rat willie clinton left the country and went to Russia to avoid the draft.
2. 'rat willie clinton was impeached.
3. 'rat willie clinton paid the NKoreans not to build nukes than watched as
they took the money and told him to stuff it.
4. Eight times terrorists bombed US embassies and a warship, and 8 times 'rat
willie clinton said we will find out who did this and punish them, and 8 times
he did nothing.
5. 'rat willie clinton destroyed the US ground-based intel in favor of
satellites. The US says "thanks for 911, 'rat willie".
6. 'rat willie clinton resided over a massive drop in prosperity in America in
his 2nd term.
7. 'rat willie clinton created a US recession in his 2nd term.
8. The stock market tanked in 'rat willie clinton's 2nd term.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Michelle: No Thanks, Too Many Skidmarks |
23 Apr 2006 06:53:26 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:08:31 -0700, DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
"Good for the country" and what Clinton did was hand-in-hand. As
evidnece: The reduction of the unemployment rate, the raising of job
numbers, the fact that we never were attacked for which the perpetrator
was never caught and prosecuted, the fact that mulitple terrorist
attacks have been thwarted, the reduction (to the point of surplus) our
debt and deficits...
1. 'rat willie clinton left the country and went to Russia to avoid the draft.
Along with _MANY_ cons.
<snip the rest> You've said all this before and have been rebuked so
many times, I'm surprised you're trying it again.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
21 Apr 2006 10:43:58 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 02:20:41 AM |
|
|
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 03:11:59 AM |
|
|
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Panama Floyd" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 04:55:51 AM |
|
|
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
And if one does not occur, he'll simply create something. You saw the
little news item maff posted about the actor who played a terrorist in
the Flt.93 movie not being granted a visa?
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article359460.ece
\Rovian
"Well, I can't imagine why someone would even *think* of playing in
such a despicable role, unless their feelings are very, very close to
the ones of the person they portray! You saw `The Postman', didn't you?
And we all know how Kevin Costner hates this government!!"
/Rovian
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 11:12:42 AM |
|
|
Panama Floyd wrote:
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
And if one does not occur, he'll simply create something. You saw the
little news item maff posted about the actor who played a terrorist in
the Flt.93 movie not being granted a visa?
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article359460.ece
\Rovian
"Well, I can't imagine why someone would even *think* of playing in
such a despicable role, unless their feelings are very, very close to
the ones of the person they portray! You saw `The Postman', didn't you?
And we all know how Kevin Costner hates this government!!"
/Rovian
LMFAO! You can't legitimately criticize him for anything he actually
said, so you just make up a phony script for him and criticize him for
that! What a fucking tool you are! Oh, BTW, from your own citation:
<quote>
Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the American Embassy said the actor had not
been denied a visa, simply not applied for one yet.
</quote>
Did you even read it? ROTFL!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 08:18:31 PM |
|
|
Fester wrote:
Panama Floyd wrote:
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
And if one does not occur, he'll simply create something. You saw the
little news item maff posted about the actor who played a terrorist in
the Flt.93 movie not being granted a visa?
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article359460.ece
\Rovian
"Well, I can't imagine why someone would even *think* of playing in
such a despicable role, unless their feelings are very, very close to
the ones of the person they portray! You saw `The Postman', didn't you?
And we all know how Kevin Costner hates this government!!"
/Rovian
LMFAO! You can't legitimately criticize him for anything he actually
said, so you just make up a phony script for him and criticize him for
that! What a fucking tool you are! Oh, BTW, from your own citation:
<quote>
Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the American Embassy said the actor had not
been denied a visa, simply not applied for one yet.
</quote>
Did you even read it? ROTFL!
"..a spokeswoman for the American Embassy.."
IOW, another lying government fuckwit. Jeez, I thought you
right-wingers *liked* it when folks mistrusted the bureaucracy.
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
23 Apr 2006 12:19:25 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Fester wrote:
Panama Floyd wrote:
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
And if one does not occur, he'll simply create something. You saw the
little news item maff posted about the actor who played a terrorist in
the Flt.93 movie not being granted a visa?
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article359460.ece
\Rovian
"Well, I can't imagine why someone would even *think* of playing in
such a despicable role, unless their feelings are very, very close to
the ones of the person they portray! You saw `The Postman', didn't you?
And we all know how Kevin Costner hates this government!!"
/Rovian
LMFAO! You can't legitimately criticize him for anything he actually
said, so you just make up a phony script for him and criticize him for
that! What a fucking tool you are! Oh, BTW, from your own citation:
<quote>
Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the American Embassy said the actor had not
been denied a visa, simply not applied for one yet.
</quote>
Did you even read it? ROTFL!
"..a spokeswoman for the American Embassy.."
IOW, another lying government fuckwit. Jeez, I thought you
right-wingers *liked* it when folks mistrusted the bureaucracy.
I see. When you don't like what one has to say you just assume that
he's lying. The quote came from *your* source, and lacking evidence to
the contrary, I find the embassy spokesman no less credible than the
rest of the article. And while your lamely trying to weasel your way
out of your own stupid arguments, try explaining how it is that you
think anyone should think you other than a tool when you argue against
the bogus words that you yourself put in Rove's mouth.
In fact don't even bother. I'll invent words that I think you'll say,
and then I'll call you an ***** because you may say such a thing.
Here goes:
<tool speak>
A dollar not confiscated by the gummint by force from an honest
businessman or worker is a dollar stolen from a needy slob who refuses
to work.
</tool speak>
What a tool you are for possibly having thought such a thing!
Gee, that was easy. No wonder you've adopted as your preferred form of
argument.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
23 Apr 2006 12:53:44 AM |
|
|
Fester wrote:
panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote:
Fester wrote:
Panama Floyd wrote:
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
And if one does not occur, he'll simply create something. You saw the
little news item maff posted about the actor who played a terrorist in
the Flt.93 movie not being granted a visa?
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article359460.ece
\Rovian
"Well, I can't imagine why someone would even *think* of playing in
such a despicable role, unless their feelings are very, very close to
the ones of the person they portray! You saw `The Postman', didn't you?
And we all know how Kevin Costner hates this government!!"
/Rovian
LMFAO! You can't legitimately criticize him for anything he actually
said, so you just make up a phony script for him and criticize him for
that! What a fucking tool you are! Oh, BTW, from your own citation:
<quote>
Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the American Embassy said the actor had not
been denied a visa, simply not applied for one yet.
</quote>
Did you even read it? ROTFL!
"..a spokeswoman for the American Embassy.."
IOW, another lying government fuckwit. Jeez, I thought you
right-wingers *liked* it when folks mistrusted the bureaucracy.
I see. When you don't like what one has to say you just assume that
he's lying.
Well, at least I didn't start up my own news network to do it..
The quote came from *your* source, and lacking evidence to
the contrary, I find the embassy spokesman no less credible than the
rest of the article. And while your lamely trying to weasel your way
out of your own stupid arguments, try explaining how it is that you
think anyone should think you other than a tool when you argue against
the bogus words that you yourself put in Rove's mouth.
Examining Rove's behavior on previous occasions doesn't count?
In fact don't even bother. I'll invent words that I think you'll say,
and then I'll call you an ***** because you may say such a thing.
Here goes:
<tool speak>
A dollar not confiscated by the gummint by force from an honest
businessman or worker is a dollar stolen from a needy slob who refuses
to work.
</tool speak>
What a tool you are for possibly having thought such a thing!
Gee, that was easy. No wonder you've adopted as your preferred form of
argument.
And small wonder you've adopted ignoring the obvious as yours.
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Department of Telepropaganda
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "L.Roberts." |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 11:43:15 AM |
|
|
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority. And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
If Al Q manages another major attack, it will be, once again, with the
help of this administration and for the purpose you stated. I would put
nothing past this administration.
I love that: 'God's Only Party'. Is that your's?
L.Roberts.
Atheist *****
aa #2258
aw Hellboy #13
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 12:52:31 PM |
|
|
In article <1145724195.102092.137330@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"L.Roberts." <ozzcat2003@yahoo.com> wrote:
If Al Q manages another major attack, it will be, once again, with the
help of this administration and for the purpose you stated. I would put
nothing past this administration.
I love that: 'God's Only Party'. Is that your's?
I doubt it. I have the impression I read it some where... I just can't
exactly place it.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 11:46:33 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, L.Roberts. in episode
<1145724195.102092.137330@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to
include a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for
the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's not
the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last
time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
If Al Q manages another major attack, it will be, once again, with the
help of this administration and for the purpose you stated. I would put
nothing past this administration.
I don't buy that this administration is competent enough to run a decent
conspiracy...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "L.Roberts." |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 11:57:07 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, L.Roberts. in episode
<1145724195.102092.137330@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to
include a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for
the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's not
the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last
time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
If Al Q manages another major attack, it will be, once again, with the
help of this administration and for the purpose you stated. I would put
nothing past this administration.
I don't buy that this administration is competent enough to run a decent
conspiracy...
LOL, agreed, but somebody with a lot of bucks has managed to get some
milage out of it regardless. How it was not obvious to all from day one
that Georgie's IQ is so low it's preceded with a decimal point is
beyond me. Of course, rulers, in this case, the US Plutocracy, have
shown once again and quite classically, the usefulness of religion.
L.Roberts.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 12:21:31 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, L.Roberts. in episode
<1145725027.083384.143230@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>...
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, L.Roberts. in episode
<1145724195.102092.137330@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to
include a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for
the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's
not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops
last time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it
out even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve
around the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare
people into voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a
major attack outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of
how he'll use it to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
If Al Q manages another major attack, it will be, once again, with the
help of this administration and for the purpose you stated. I would
put nothing past this administration.
I don't buy that this administration is competent enough to run a decent
conspiracy...
LOL, agreed, but somebody with a lot of bucks has managed to get some
milage out of it regardless. How it was not obvious to all from day one
that Georgie's IQ is so low it's preceded with a decimal point is beyond
me. Of course, rulers, in this case, the US Plutocracy, have shown once
again and quite classically, the usefulness of religion.
Interestingly enough, only barely so.
The fundies went all out in 2004 and it was a squeaker of an election. I
think it's a definite case of "objects in this mirror may be smaller than
they appear."
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "L.Roberts." |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 02:14:24 PM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, L.Roberts. in episode
<1145725027.083384.143230@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>...
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, L.Roberts. in episode
<1145724195.102092.137330@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to
include a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for
the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's
not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops
last time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it
out even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve
around the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare
people into voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a
major attack outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of
how he'll use it to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
If Al Q manages another major attack, it will be, once again, with the
help of this administration and for the purpose you stated. I would
put nothing past this administration.
I don't buy that this administration is competent enough to run a decent
conspiracy...
LOL, agreed, but somebody with a lot of bucks has managed to get some
milage out of it regardless. How it was not obvious to all from day one
that Georgie's IQ is so low it's preceded with a decimal point is beyond
me. Of course, rulers, in this case, the US Plutocracy, have shown once
again and quite classically, the usefulness of religion.
Interestingly enough, only barely so.
The fundies went all out in 2004 and it was a squeaker of an election. I
think it's a definite case of "objects in this mirror may be smaller than
they appear."
Well, I don't believe he got as much as 48% of the votes in either
election (I believe God's Only Party tampered with the ballots boxes)
and what votes he did get, again, it being unbelievable he got any
considering his glaring ineptitude, were because of his having been
coached to say he was a born again Christian, and ***** like that.
That he got as many actual votes as he did in the two elections, to me,
would not be any more astounding than it would if an idiot like the
character Jethro Bodine got that many votes.
L.Roberts.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
24 Apr 2006 08:40:31 AM |
|
|
On 22 Apr 2006 12:14:24 -0700, "L.Roberts." <ozzcat2003@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, L.Roberts. in episode
<1145725027.083384.143230@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>...
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, L.Roberts. in episode
<1145724195.102092.137330@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
*nemo* wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to
include a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for
the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's
not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops
last time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it
out even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve
around the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare
people into voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a
major attack outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of
how he'll use it to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
If Al Q manages another major attack, it will be, once again, with the
help of this administration and for the purpose you stated. I would
put nothing past this administration.
I don't buy that this administration is competent enough to run a decent
conspiracy...
LOL, agreed, but somebody with a lot of bucks has managed to get some
milage out of it regardless. How it was not obvious to all from day one
that Georgie's IQ is so low it's preceded with a decimal point is beyond
me. Of course, rulers, in this case, the US Plutocracy, have shown once
again and quite classically, the usefulness of religion.
Interestingly enough, only barely so.
The fundies went all out in 2004 and it was a squeaker of an election. I
think it's a definite case of "objects in this mirror may be smaller than
they appear."
Well, I don't believe he got as much as 48% of the votes in either
election (I believe God's Only Party tampered with the ballots boxes)
and what votes he did get, again, it being unbelievable he got any
considering his glaring ineptitude, were because of his having been
coached to say he was a born again Christian, and ***** like that.
That he got as many actual votes as he did in the two elections, to me,
would not be any more astounding than it would if an idiot like the
character Jethro Bodine got that many votes.
Jethro Bodine would probably make a better president. <G>
L.Roberts.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
23 Apr 2006 01:05:28 AM |
|
|
In article <nemo0037-3C380B.04090722042006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration priority.
And
given the unfavorable political terrain for the president, Rove's
recipe
this year, as in 2004, is likely to include a heavy dollop of attacks
on
the Democrats. Hold on for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your
swing state. It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often
works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last time
and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest re-election
margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their solution
is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican. I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack
outside the US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it
to assure yet another victory for God's Only Party.
Even if there isn't an attack they'll start raising orange and red
alerts just like they did during the last national campaign. I also
wouldn't put it past them to try provoking Iran into doing something.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
22 Apr 2006 06:35:02 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, *nemo* in episode
<nemo0037-3C380B.04090722042006@news.east.earthlink.net>...
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to include
a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for the new
Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's not the
politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last
time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around the
issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into voting
Republican.
Good ol' one note Rovey.
I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack outside the
US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it to assure yet
another victory for God's Only Party.
And I'm betting he'll neglect the major factor they took advantage of
before: the short attention span of the US electorate.
For the next several months, any time anybody tries to yell "LOOK! A
TERRIERIST!!!" the public will forget about it soon as they try to fill up
their car.
It's not even the start of the "summer driving season" and we're pushing
$3 a gallon already...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
23 Apr 2006 01:10:01 AM |
|
|
In article <buednZ-R2-R6idfZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, *nemo* in episode
<nemo0037-3C380B.04090722042006@news.east.earthlink.net>...
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to include
a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for the new
Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's not the
politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops last
time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it out
even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around the
issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into voting
Republican.
Good ol' one note Rovey.
I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack outside the
US, he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it to assure yet
another victory for God's Only Party.
And I'm betting he'll neglect the major factor they took advantage of
before: the short attention span of the US electorate.
For the next several months, any time anybody tries to yell "LOOK! A
TERRIERIST!!!" the public will forget about it soon as they try to fill up
their car.
It's not even the start of the "summer driving season" and we're pushing
$3 a gallon already...
His Dumbness was out in California today to see his buddy Ah-nuld. The
news showed a large group of protesters. It seems the the most numerous
signs were split between the war and gas prices. $3.15/gal. is the
cheapest I've seen it here and it's going up.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
23 Apr 2006 07:55:31 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, johac in episode
<jhachmann-D49193.23100122042006@news.giganews.com>...
In article <buednZ-R2-R6idfZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, *nemo* in episode
<nemo0037-3C380B.04090722042006@news.east.earthlink.net>...
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to
include a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for
the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's not
the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops
last time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it
out even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican.
Good ol' one note Rovey.
I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack outside the US, he'll
have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it to assure yet
another victory for God's Only Party.
And I'm betting he'll neglect the major factor they took advantage of
before: the short attention span of the US electorate.
For the next several months, any time anybody tries to yell "LOOK! A
TERRIERIST!!!" the public will forget about it soon as they try to fill
up their car.
It's not even the start of the "summer driving season" and we're pushing
$3 a gallon already...
His Dumbness was out in California today to see his buddy Ah-nuld. The
news showed a large group of protesters. It seems the the most numerous
signs were split between the war and gas prices. $3.15/gal. is the
cheapest I've seen it here and it's going up.
It's gonna get nasty. We haven't even started the "summer driving season"
when prices normally rise. I'm betting a national average of, say, $3.25.
(In California terms, that translates to $3.60 or so)
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
23 Apr 2006 11:34:03 PM |
|
|
In article <ufKdnUOjTsyev9HZnZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, johac in episode
<jhachmann-D49193.23100122042006@news.giganews.com>...
In article <buednZ-R2-R6idfZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, *nemo* in episode
<nemo0037-3C380B.04090722042006@news.east.earthlink.net>...
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to
include a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on for
the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state. It's not
the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops
last time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the) smallest
re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it
out even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve around
the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare people into
voting Republican.
Good ol' one note Rovey.
I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack outside the US, he'll
have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it to assure yet
another victory for God's Only Party.
And I'm betting he'll neglect the major factor they took advantage of
before: the short attention span of the US electorate.
For the next several months, any time anybody tries to yell "LOOK! A
TERRIERIST!!!" the public will forget about it soon as they try to fill
up their car.
It's not even the start of the "summer driving season" and we're pushing
$3 a gallon already...
His Dumbness was out in California today to see his buddy Ah-nuld. The
news showed a large group of protesters. It seems the the most numerous
signs were split between the war and gas prices. $3.15/gal. is the
cheapest I've seen it here and it's going up.
It's gonna get nasty. We haven't even started the "summer driving season"
when prices normally rise. I'm betting a national average of, say, $3.25.
(In California terms, that translates to $3.60 or so)
At least. No one has ever explained to me why the California prices
should be so much higher. The oil companies complain about the lack of
refineries here, but it seems that every time the price goes up like
this, three or four of them are 'down for maintenance' . What gives?
I also am hearing nothing about the oil companies helping out by
trimming their profits or cutting their executive salaries.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred Stone: Eat Mah Shorts! |
24 Apr 2006 07:51:38 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, johac in episode
<jhachmann-CE04F6.21340323042006@news.giganews.com>...
In article <ufKdnUOjTsyev9HZnZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, johac in episode
<jhachmann-D49193.23100122042006@news.giganews.com>...
In article <buednZ-R2-R6idfZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, *nemo* in episode
<nemo0037-3C380B.04090722042006@news.east.earthlink.net>...
In article <jhachmann-BCC1A2.00204122042006@news.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:
In article <i7KdnTppE_vjO9TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Michelle Malkin in episode
<r7mdnTihccSl59TZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>...
Thus Rove's new electoral focus is an urgent administration
priority. And given the unfavorable political terrain for the
president, Rove's recipe this year, as in 2004, is likely to
include a heavy dollop of attacks on the Democrats. Hold on
for the new Swift Boaters, coming soon to your swing state.
It's not the politics dreams are made of, but it often works.
Yeah but Rove is a one note Johnny. He pulled out all the stops
last time and managed to only eek out one of (maybe the)
smallest re-election margins in history.
Fortunately, when the Bushies see their policies failing, their
solution is to do more of the same...
The way things are going, I don't see how Rove is going to pull it
out even with advanced slime tactics.
The other week, Karl said that the coming election will revolve
around the issue of security. In other words, he expects to scare
people into voting Republican.
Good ol' one note Rovey.
I bet if Al Qaeda manages to run a major attack outside the US,
he'll have an orgasm at the thought of how he'll use it to assure
yet another victory for God's Only Party.
And I'm betting he'll neglect the major factor they took advantage of
before: the short attention span of the US electorate.
For the next several months, any time anybody tries to yell "LOOK! A
TERRIERIST!!!" the public will forget about it soon as they try to
fill up their car.
It's not even the start of the "summer driving season" and we're
pushing $3 a gallon already...
His Dumbness was out in California today to see his buddy Ah-nuld. The
news showed a large group of protesters. It seems the the most
numerous signs were split between the war and gas prices. $3.15/gal.
is the cheapest I've seen it here and it's going up.
It's gonna get nasty. We haven't even started the "summer driving
season" when prices normally rise. I'm betting a national average of,
say, $3.25.
(In California terms, that translates to $3.60 or so)
At least. No one has ever explained to me why the California prices should
be so much higher. The oil companies complain about the lack of refineries
here, but it seems that every time the price goes up like this, three or
four of them are 'down for maintenance' . What gives?
The price difference is in part because of California environmental
regulations. So, yes, the anti-environmentalist crowd is partially
correct. California was the first in requiring certain formulations of
gasoline that now are more wide spread as other cities discovered *why
California did it.
So it could be cheaper. You just couldn't ever go outside again.
Especially in SoCal. With the density of the cities, the number of cars,
and the particular weather conditions, every summer would look like Mexico
city where the smog gets so bad, birds *literally fall out of trees dead.
LA natives I knew when I lived there would talk about the 70s smog
situation when stage twos were common. Kids being kept inside for recess,
elderly ending up in hospitals, everybody getting sore throats and
respiratory problems during their commutes. Imagine if they'd just let it
progress for another thirty years.
Far as refineries shutting down, we're in a bad situation. Our refining
capacity is maxed out. It really is a normal process to shut down some
plants for maintenance in the spring. They're gearing up for the busy
summer driving season. But with no spare capacity, a | | | | | | | | |
