| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fred Stone" |
| Date: |
02 May 2005 09:54:54 PM |
| Object: |
Free Testaclese! |
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/sommers200505020808.asp
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters Eve Ensler’s
play The Vagina Monologues and schools across the nation celebrate “V-
Day” (short for Vagina Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained on the celebrations
of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror. Two participating
students, Monique Stuart and Andy Mainiero, have just received sharp
letters of reprimand and have been placed on probation by the Office of
Judicial Affairs. The costume of the P-Day “mascot” — a friendly looking
“penis” named Testaclese, has been confiscated and is under lock and key
in the office of the assistant dean of student affairs, John King.
The P-Day satirists are the first to admit that their initiative is
tasteless and crude. But they rightly point out that V-Day is far more
extreme. They are shocked that the administration has come down hard on
their good-natured spoof, when all along it has been completely
accommodating to the in-your-face vulgarity of the vagina activists.
V-Day has now replaced Valentine’s Day on more than 500 college campuses
(including Catholic ones). The high point of the day is a performance of
Ensler’s raunchy play, which consists of various women talking in
graphic, and I mean graphic, terms about their intimate anatomy. The
play is poisonously anti-male. Its only romantic scene, if you can call
it that, takes place when a 24-year-old woman seduces a young girl (in
the original version she was 13 years old, but in a more recent version
is played as a 16-year-old.) The woman invites the girl into her car,
takes her to her house, plies her with vodka, and seduces her. What
might seem like a scene from a public-service kidnapping-prevention
video shown to schoolchildren becomes, in Ensler’s play “a kind of
heaven.”
The week before V-Day, the Roger Williams campus was plastered with
flyers emblazoned with slogans such as “My Vagina is Flirty” and “My
Vagina is Huggable.” There was a widely publicized “orgasm workshop.” On
the day of the play, the V-warriors sold lollipops in the in the shape
of–-guess what? Last year, the student union was flooded with
questionnaires asking unsuspecting students questions like “What does
your Vagina smell like?” None of this offended the administration or
elicited any reprimands, probations, or confiscations.
The campus conservatives artfully (in the college sense of "artful")
mimicked the V-Day campaign. They papered the school with flyers that
said, “My penis is majestic” and “My penis is hilarious.” The caption on
one handout read, “My Penis is studious.” It showed Testaclese reclining
on a couch reading Michael Barone’s Hard America, Soft America.
“Testaclese” tipped the scales when he approached the university
Provost, Edward J. Kavanagh, outside the student union. Apparently
taking him/it for a giant mushroom, Provost Kavanagh cheerfully greeted
him. But when Testaclese presented him with an honorary award as a
campus “Penis Warrior,” the stunned official realized that it was no
mushroom. After this incident, which was recorded on videotape, the
promoters of P-Day were ordered to cease circulating their flyers and to
keep Testaclese off campus grounds. Mindful of how school officers had
never once protested any of the antics of Vagina warriors, the P-
warriors did not comply. The Testaclese costume was then confiscated and
formal charges followed.
It is easy to understand why school officials would not want a six-foot
phallus wandering around campus; nor why they would ask students not to
paper the college with posters describing all the things it likes to do.
But that is just the sort of thing the vagina warriors have been doing,
year after year, on hundreds of campuses. In fact, P-Day at Roger
Williams was mild by comparison. Wesleyan College hosted a “C***”
workshop; Penn State held a “C***”-fest. At Arizona State, students
displayed a 40-foot inflatable plastic vagina. It was not confiscated
and no one was ever threatened with probation.
Unhappily, P-Day may be the only effective means of countering V-Day
with all its c-fests, graphic lollipops, intrusive questionnaires,
outsized effigies of vaginas and its thematic anti-male play. The
prospect of public readings from P-Monologues on campuses around the
country just might be the reductio ad absurdum that could drive the
vagina warriors to the bargaining table. The student activists opposed
to V-Day will gladly cancel P-Day the moment the V-warriors abandon
their vagina–fests.
But for the short term, college administrators should brace themselves.
The rebels at Roger Williams are talking about a Free Testaclese Fund.
And word is spreading to other campuses. P-Day and Testaclese will be
back next year. And not just in Rhode Island...
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 12:24:47 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
What if their response to MLK day was "Satire" aimed at
those remembering the man and his achievements?
Go, "Fred," pretend that you've got some genitals of your
own and explain it to us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AckbarJedi" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 01:34:15 AM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
What if their response to MLK day was "Satire" aimed at
those remembering the man and his achievements?
Go, "Fred," pretend that you've got some genitals of your
own and explain it to us.
Those suggestions are irrelavant.
Everyone in the US has the right to employ satire against any group they
disagree with without regard to the level of respect the community has
for it. If you want to make fun of passover or Martin Luther King Jr.
then fine, they ought to be able to do that just as they ought to be
allowed to mock V-day. One might be regarded as *stupid* for one's own
comments, but that doesn't justify judicial action against any student
and especially not in this case.
The administrators are unjustified as are your emotion-based arguments
that one simply ought not to be able to make fun of things because of
the level of respect one has for them.
--
AckbarJedi
Agnostic Atheist #2113
---
"That theory is worthless. It isn't even wrong!"
~Wolfgang Pauli
---
To e-mail remove DeathtoSpam from my e-mail address.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 02:23:27 AM |
|
|
"AckbarJedi" <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
What if their response to MLK day was "Satire" aimed at
those remembering the man and his achievements?
Go, "Fred," pretend that you've got some genitals of your
own and explain it to us.
Those suggestions are irrelavant.
Of course they're not.
Everyone in the US has the right to employ satire against
any group they disagree with without regard to the level
of respect the community has for it.
Everyone in the US has a right to be offended by bigoted
malice.
One might be regarded as *stupid* for one's own comments,
but that doesn't justify judicial action against any student
and especially not in this case.
Again, motives do play a role here, as much as you need
to pretend otherwise.
The malice is undeniable.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank J Warner" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 08:16:58 AM |
|
|
In article <OMWdnZ3Tbth-uerfRVn-sA@comcast.com>, JTEM
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
The malice is undeniable.
Sounds to me, JTEM, that the organizers (I love the puns that come
(oops) up spontaneously here) of P-Day are fighting malice with humor.
-Frank
--
Here's some of my work:
http://www.franksknives.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "L. Raymond" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 12:57:35 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 May 2005 06:16:58 -0700, Frank J Warner wrote:
In article <OMWdnZ3Tbth-uerfRVn-sA@comcast.com>, JTEM
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
The malice is undeniable.
Sounds to me, JTEM, that the organizers (I love the puns that come
(oops) up spontaneously here) of P-Day are fighting malice with humor.
I'm afraid you've got that wrong. The V-day organizers
(www.v-day.org) have a deadly serious message about the abuse of women
that they are trying to spread, while the P-day people, not having
anything constructive message of their own to put forward, are just
mocking them
Personally, I don't care for either happening, since I think the whole
V-day thing is definitely *not* the best nor even a particularly good
way to do what they want, but I care even less for people suggesting
they're a pack of man-hating viragos without having read up on their
organization.
By the way, did you read Non Sequitur yesterday? That dog ended up at
the Yankee grandmother's diner and is now with the main family.
--
L. Raymond
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 01:35:20 PM |
|
|
"L. Raymond" <badaddress@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in
news:77a12j316shg$.1w02lzygkj5s8$.dlg@40tude.net:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 06:16:58 -0700, Frank J Warner wrote:
In article <OMWdnZ3Tbth-uerfRVn-sA@comcast.com>, JTEM
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
The malice is undeniable.
Sounds to me, JTEM, that the organizers (I love the puns that come
(oops) up spontaneously here) of P-Day are fighting malice with
humor.
I'm afraid you've got that wrong. The V-day organizers
(www.v-day.org)
Domain registered but no content.
Try http://www.vday.org
have a deadly serious message about the abuse of women
that they are trying to spread,
while the P-day people, not having
anything constructive message of their own to put forward, are just
mocking them
Personally, I don't care for either happening, since I think the
whole
V-day thing is definitely *not* the best nor even a particularly good
way to do what they want, but I care even less for people suggesting
they're a pack of man-hating viragos without having read up on their
organization.
I think it's their methods being mocked, not their message.
By the way, did you read Non Sequitur yesterday? That dog ended up
at
the Yankee grandmother's diner and is now with the main family.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank J Warner" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 05:19:35 PM |
|
|
In article <77a12j316shg$.1w02lzygkj5s8$.dlg@40tude.net>, L. Raymond
<badaddress@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 06:16:58 -0700, Frank J Warner wrote:
In article <OMWdnZ3Tbth-uerfRVn-sA@comcast.com>, JTEM
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
The malice is undeniable.
Sounds to me, JTEM, that the organizers (I love the puns that come
(oops) up spontaneously here) of P-Day are fighting malice with humor.
I'm afraid you've got that wrong. The V-day organizers
(www.v-day.org) have a deadly serious message about the abuse of women
But, sadly, their message isn't aimed at abusers. It's aimed rather
indiscriminately at men. In all of the "Vagina Monologues" there is but
one positive passage about a man, a lucky fellow named Bob who helped
one woman to love her vagina. The remainder of Ensler's play is
vitriolically anti-male (that is, the parts that don't advocate the
seduction of 13-year-old girls by older women, characterized as "good
rape").
I am totally opposed to violence against women (or any innocent person)
and will actively combat it when I see it. I simply think the
organizers and some supporters of V-Day events go too far when they
condemn nearly half the population for the actions of a few.
that they are trying to spread, while the P-day people, not having
anything constructive message of their own to put forward, are just
mocking them
Personally, I don't care for either happening, since I think the whole
V-day thing is definitely *not* the best nor even a particularly good
way to do what they want, but I care even less for people suggesting
they're a pack of man-hating viragos without having read up on their
organization.
I have read a great deal of the information at their web site, and they
go to great lengths to avoid the appearance of misandry. But their
actual events pull very few punches with regard to a zeal for
male-bashing. Males aren't even allowed to speak at their events, no
matter how much they agree with the messages being broadcast.
To my mind, this is one of those instances where you have to substitute
their use of the word "male" or "penis" or "patriarchal" with another
word such as "Jew" or "handicapped" or "communist" to see how far
overboard they've gone, not to mention the tendency to alienate people
like me who actually sympathize with their objectives.
Violence against women is not solely a female problem. I think satire
is a viable way of pointing that out.
By the way, did you read Non Sequitur yesterday? That dog ended up at
the Yankee grandmother's diner and is now with the main family.
Yeah. I liked it. I liked today's even better, "The Prince formerly
known as Charming." It was perfect for those of us with short attention
spans.
-Frank
--
fwarner1-at-franksknives-dot-com
Here's some of my work:
http://www.franksknives.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
04 May 2005 08:37:45 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 3 May 2005 03:23:27 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and wrote:
"AckbarJedi" <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
What if their response to MLK day was "Satire" aimed at
those remembering the man and his achievements?
Go, "Fred," pretend that you've got some genitals of your
own and explain it to us.
Those suggestions are irrelavant.
Of course they're not.
Everyone in the US has the right to employ satire against
any group they disagree with without regard to the level
of respect the community has for it.
Everyone in the US has a right to be offended by bigoted
malice.
*****.
One might be regarded as *stupid* for one's own comments,
but that doesn't justify judicial action against any student
and especially not in this case.
Again, motives do play a role here, as much as you need
to pretend otherwise.
The malice is undeniable.
Are rights being violated by this malice?
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 17 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
05 May 2005 12:39:04 AM |
|
|
"Daniel Kolle" <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote
Everyone in the US has a right to be offended by bigoted
malice.
*****.
Grow the ***** up.
Thanks in advance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
05 May 2005 05:54:46 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 May 2005 01:39:04 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and wrote:
"Daniel Kolle" <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote
Everyone in the US has a right to be offended by bigoted
malice.
*****.
Grow the ***** up.
Thanks in advance.
I am offended by bigoted malice.
Are you familiar with the concept of rights? If it is a right,
the state must protect it. Does the state protect people from having
their widdle feelings hurt? No? Well, now.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 17 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
06 May 2005 02:42:20 AM |
|
|
"Daniel Kolle" <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote
I am offended by bigoted malice.
According to you, you have no right to be offended.
Are you familiar with the concept of rights? If it is a
right, the state must protect it.
It does. You didn't think "Free Speech" only protected
hate group, did you?
Does the state protect people from having
their widdle feelings hurt?
You're imagining things.
Lots of things.
No? Well, now.
Well, what?
Go on.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
05 May 2005 08:08:06 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 05 May 2005 17:54:46 -0500, Daniel Kolle
<Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2005 01:39:04 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and wrote:
"Daniel Kolle" <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote
Everyone in the US has a right to be offended by bigoted
malice.
*****.
Grow the ***** up.
Thanks in advance.
I am offended by bigoted malice.
Are you familiar with the concept of rights? If it is a right,
the state must protect it. Does the state protect people from having
their widdle feelings hurt? No? Well, now.
You seem to mistake the statement for 'every person has a right to be
protected from being offended'.
Read it again. You blew it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 06:41:39 AM |
|
|
AckbarJedi <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote in
news:d57618$cmp$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu:
JTEM wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
Hint: "Freedom of expression".
Bigger hint: "Liberal Double Standards".
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
I find it hilarious that JTEM compares "Vagina Day", celebrating a
vulgar play that glorifies child abuse, with a cultural and religious
holiday like Passover.
What if their response to MLK day was "Satire" aimed at
those remembering the man and his achievements?
And again, JTEM tries to abduct the standing of an honorable man for
support of a feminist glorification of vulgarity and child abuse.
Go, "Fred," pretend that you've got some genitals of your
own and explain it to us.
Those suggestions are irrelavant.
Everyone in the US has the right to employ satire against any group
they disagree with without regard to the level of respect the
community has for it. If you want to make fun of passover or Martin
Luther King Jr. then fine, they ought to be able to do that just as
they ought to be allowed to mock V-day. One might be regarded as
*stupid* for one's own comments, but that doesn't justify judicial
action against any student and especially not in this case.
The administrators are unjustified as are your emotion-based arguments
that one simply ought not to be able to make fun of things because of
the level of respect one has for them.
JTEM is a typical liberal. Freedom of expression is only allowed for
other liberals, and only for party-approved expression. All others need
not apply.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 01:45:30 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Hint: "Freedom of expression".
Bigger hint: "Liberal Double Standards".
Where's the double standard?
Explain it.
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
I find it hilarious that JTEM compares "Vagina Day", celebrating a
vulgar play that glorifies child abuse, with a cultural and religious
holiday like Passover.
I find it surprising that you could convince yourself that you're
qualified to offer an accurate & unbiased description of anything
your partisan "team" told you to be against.
Why is it even supposed to be a "Political" issue here?
Seriously. These are college "Republicans" you said.
What if their response to MLK day was "Satire" aimed at
those remembering the man and his achievements?
And again, JTEM tries to abduct the standing of an honorable
man for support of a feminist glorification of vulgarity and
child abuse.
You'd be the first to ***** on MLK's grave, if the GOP "leadership"
so much as hinted that you should. And, if you didn't get it the
first time, you're the last person qualified to describe ANYTHING
that your partisan "team" is politicizing.
JTEM is a typical liberal.
Meaning, what? That I'm fed up with you filthy bastards ramming
politics into *Everything*.
Get it out. Like your sister told you that night in the woods: Get it
out!
The your fucking "politics" out of everyone's face, out of every
aspect of life.
Freedom of expression is only allowed for other liberals,
Well, moron, it appears you forgot to quote the part were
it explained that your V-Day was being conducted by people
representing Democrats.
Becuase, you know, it clearly did say that the malicious
bastards were acting AS PART of a Republican group.
Moron.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mephisto" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 02:42:04 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 May 2005 11:41:39 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
AckbarJedi <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote in
news:d57618$cmp$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu:
JTEM wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
Hint: "Freedom of expression".
Bigger hint: "Liberal Double Standards".
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
I find it hilarious that JTEM compares "Vagina Day", celebrating a
vulgar play that glorifies child abuse, with a cultural and religious
holiday like Passover.
Which part of the play glorifies child abuse?
Mephisto
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 03:31:21 PM |
|
|
"Mephisto" <mephisto@go.away> wrote
Which part of the play glorifies child abuse?
The part where everyone doesn't stop and explicitly
state -- for at least ten minutes -- that they're not
glorifying child abuse.
That is, going by the usual right-wing *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mephisto" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 05:08:45 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 3 May 2005 16:31:21 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Mephisto" <mephisto@go.away> wrote
Which part of the play glorifies child abuse?
The part where everyone doesn't stop and explicitly
state -- for at least ten minutes -- that they're not
glorifying child abuse.
That is, going by the usual right-wing *****.
I know they can be a bunch of loonies sometimes, but I'm surprised
they're attacking a play like this. It's pretty inoffensive and very
funny.
Mephisto
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
04 May 2005 02:24:14 AM |
|
|
"Mephisto" <mephisto@go.away> wrote
I know they can be a bunch of loonies sometimes, but I'm surprised
they're attacking a play like this. It's pretty inoffensive and very
funny.
All it takes is for one dog to start barking, and pretty soon every
&*%@ dog in the neighborhood is howling away.
"Fred," like the rest, is such an idiot he doesn't even know who
he doesn't like. He's not capable of forming an opinion on his
own, and these are college Republicans spewing their malice
towards the woman....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mephisto" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
05 May 2005 04:46:53 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 4 May 2005 03:24:14 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Mephisto" <mephisto@go.away> wrote
I know they can be a bunch of loonies sometimes, but I'm surprised
they're attacking a play like this. It's pretty inoffensive and very
funny.
All it takes is for one dog to start barking, and pretty soon every
&*%@ dog in the neighborhood is howling away.
"Fred," like the rest, is such an idiot he doesn't even know who
he doesn't like. He's not capable of forming an opinion on his
own, and these are college Republicans spewing their malice
towards the woman....
He hasn't seen the play. I think that was all I really needed to know.
If he wants to base his opinion of a play one that of a rabid
republican that's his business, but perhaps he shouldn't expect anyone
else to take it seriously.
Mephisto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
05 May 2005 09:44:28 AM |
|
|
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:urqj715bmlsfo9o7vck98nudtfk4meit4q@4ax.com:
On Wed, 4 May 2005 03:24:14 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Mephisto" <mephisto@go.away> wrote
I know they can be a bunch of loonies sometimes, but I'm surprised
they're attacking a play like this. It's pretty inoffensive and very
funny.
All it takes is for one dog to start barking, and pretty soon every
&*%@ dog in the neighborhood is howling away.
"Fred," like the rest, is such an idiot he doesn't even know who
he doesn't like. He's not capable of forming an opinion on his
own, and these are college Republicans spewing their malice
towards the woman....
He hasn't seen the play. I think that was all I really needed to know.
If he wants to base his opinion of a play one that of a rabid
republican that's his business, but perhaps he shouldn't expect anyone
else to take it seriously.
Nice to see that you're as rabid as JTEM and just as much of a dog,
howling because another one howls.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
05 May 2005 03:10:10 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Nice to see that you're as rabid as JTEM and just
as much of a dog, howling because another one howls.
...he said, while pissing down his leg over some
play he's never even seen.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mephisto" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
06 May 2005 02:37:43 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 05 May 2005 14:44:28 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:urqj715bmlsfo9o7vck98nudtfk4meit4q@4ax.com:
On Wed, 4 May 2005 03:24:14 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Mephisto" <mephisto@go.away> wrote
I know they can be a bunch of loonies sometimes, but I'm surprised
they're attacking a play like this. It's pretty inoffensive and very
funny.
All it takes is for one dog to start barking, and pretty soon every
&*%@ dog in the neighborhood is howling away.
"Fred," like the rest, is such an idiot he doesn't even know who
he doesn't like. He's not capable of forming an opinion on his
own, and these are college Republicans spewing their malice
towards the woman....
He hasn't seen the play. I think that was all I really needed to know.
If he wants to base his opinion of a play one that of a rabid
republican that's his business, but perhaps he shouldn't expect anyone
else to take it seriously.
Nice to see that you're as rabid as JTEM and just as much of a dog,
howling because another one howls.
What's rabid about pointing out your ignorance? It's not as though
you've made any attempt to keep it a secret :-)
Mephisto
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 03:30:13 PM |
|
|
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:gvkf71lrkhdf1vrn2budo95g3eq6tgmduq@4ax.com:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 11:41:39 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
AckbarJedi <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote in
news:d57618$cmp$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu:
JTEM wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
Hint: "Freedom of expression".
Bigger hint: "Liberal Double Standards".
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
I find it hilarious that JTEM compares "Vagina Day", celebrating a
vulgar play that glorifies child abuse, with a cultural and religious
holiday like Passover.
Which part of the play glorifies child abuse?
The scene where the older woman seduces the underage girl.
"Its only romantic scene, if you can call it that, takes place when a
24-year-old woman seduces a young girl (in the original version she was
13 years old, but in a more recent version is played as a 16-year-old.)
The woman invites the girl into her car, takes her to her house, plies
her with vodka, and seduces her. What might seem like a scene from a
public-service kidnapping-prevention video shown to schoolchildren
becomes, in Ensler’s play “a kind of heaven.”
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mephisto" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 05:06:20 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 May 2005 20:30:13 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:gvkf71lrkhdf1vrn2budo95g3eq6tgmduq@4ax.com:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 11:41:39 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
AckbarJedi <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote in
news:d57618$cmp$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu:
JTEM wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
Hint: "Freedom of expression".
Bigger hint: "Liberal Double Standards".
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
I find it hilarious that JTEM compares "Vagina Day", celebrating a
vulgar play that glorifies child abuse, with a cultural and religious
holiday like Passover.
Which part of the play glorifies child abuse?
The scene where the older woman seduces the underage girl.
"Its only romantic scene, if you can call it that, takes place when a
24-year-old woman seduces a young girl (in the original version she was
13 years old, but in a more recent version is played as a 16-year-old.)
The woman invites the girl into her car, takes her to her house, plies
her with vodka, and seduces her. What might seem like a scene from a
public-service kidnapping-prevention video shown to schoolchildren
becomes, in Ensler’s play “a kind of heaven.”
That just says that it happens in the play. It is described in some
detail and some people have found it offensive but that's art for you.
Where, though, is it glorified?
Have you seen the play, or are you just relying on one obviously
biased anti-feminist review for your information about it?
Mephisto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dale" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
04 May 2005 12:56:32 AM |
|
|
"Mephisto" <mephisto@go.away> wrote in message
news:getf71h56mv559m4odc1q84lm31ogquj7r@4ax.com...
[...]
Have you seen the play, or are you just relying on one obviously
biased anti-feminist review for your information about it?
Some info on the "anti-feminist" reviewer. Not that some women aren't
anti-feminist, especially right-wing women, but...
Christina Hoff Sommers is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise
Institute. She is the co-author of One Nation Under Therapy: How the Helping
Culture Undermines Self-Reliance, just out from St. Martin's Press.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 06:04:35 PM |
|
|
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:getf71h56mv559m4odc1q84lm31ogquj7r@4ax.com:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 20:30:13 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:gvkf71lrkhdf1vrn2budo95g3eq6tgmduq@4ax.com:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 11:41:39 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
AckbarJedi <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote in
news:d57618$cmp$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu:
JTEM wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
Hint: "Freedom of expression".
Bigger hint: "Liberal Double Standards".
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
I find it hilarious that JTEM compares "Vagina Day", celebrating a
vulgar play that glorifies child abuse, with a cultural and
religious holiday like Passover.
Which part of the play glorifies child abuse?
The scene where the older woman seduces the underage girl.
"Its only romantic scene, if you can call it that, takes place when a
24-year-old woman seduces a young girl (in the original version she
was 13 years old, but in a more recent version is played as a
16-year-old.) The woman invites the girl into her car, takes her to
her house, plies her with vodka, and seduces her. What might seem like
a scene from a public-service kidnapping-prevention video shown to
schoolchildren becomes, in Ensler’s play “a kind of heaven.”
That just says that it happens in the play. It is described in some
detail and some people have found it offensive but that's art for you.
Where, though, is it glorified?
http://research.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/vag_mon.html
[discussion thread]
Hi everyone,
I want to amend my earlier comment about the performance of The
Vagina Monologues that we saw in Detroit; it seems that my
description is confusing folks.
The monologue by the 13-year-old girl who was seduced by an older
woman was performed. However, in the published text of the work,
there is a concluding paragraph that was not performed. The
paragraph says, in part, "Now people say that it was a kind of rape.
I was only thirteen and she was twenty-four. Well, I say, if it was
a rape, it was a good rape then, a rape that turned my sorry-*****
coochi-snorcher [vagina] into a kind of heaven" (75).
The decision to leave these lines out of the performance troubles me
quite a bit, although I can imagine why people would be reluctant to
say "good rape" out loud in any setting.
Have you seen the play, or are you just relying on one obviously
biased anti-feminist review for your information about it?
As opposed to a few obviously biased pro-feminist reviews? I've seen
more than one negative review. Not all of them are from "conservative"
papers.
No, I haven't seen it. Have you?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Stahl" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
04 May 2005 12:34:34 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1115161475.589c6cc1b3288c20353a15f619fc5e43@teranews...
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:getf71h56mv559m4odc1q84lm31ogquj7r@4ax.com:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 20:30:13 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:gvkf71lrkhdf1vrn2budo95g3eq6tgmduq@4ax.com:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 11:41:39 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
AckbarJedi <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote in
news:d57618$cmp$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu:
JTEM wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
Hint: "Freedom of expression".
Bigger hint: "Liberal Double Standards".
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
I find it hilarious that JTEM compares "Vagina Day", celebrating a
vulgar play that glorifies child abuse, with a cultural and
religious holiday like Passover.
Which part of the play glorifies child abuse?
The scene where the older woman seduces the underage girl.
"Its only romantic scene, if you can call it that, takes place when a
24-year-old woman seduces a young girl (in the original version she
was 13 years old, but in a more recent version is played as a
16-year-old.) The woman invites the girl into her car, takes her to
her house, plies her with vodka, and seduces her. What might seem like
a scene from a public-service kidnapping-prevention video shown to
schoolchildren becomes, in Ensler’s play “a kind of heaven.”
That just says that it happens in the play. It is described in some
detail and some people have found it offensive but that's art for you.
Where, though, is it glorified?
http://research.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/vag_mon.html
[discussion thread]
Hi everyone,
I want to amend my earlier comment about the performance of The
Vagina Monologues that we saw in Detroit; it seems that my
description is confusing folks.
The monologue by the 13-year-old girl who was seduced by an older
woman was performed. However, in the published text of the work,
there is a concluding paragraph that was not performed. The
paragraph says, in part, "Now people say that it was a kind of rape.
I was only thirteen and she was twenty-four. Well, I say, if it was
a rape, it was a good rape then, a rape that turned my sorry-*****
coochi-snorcher [vagina] into a kind of heaven" (75).
The decision to leave these lines out of the performance troubles me
quite a bit, although I can imagine why people would be reluctant to
say "good rape" out loud in any setting.
Have you seen the play, or are you just relying on one obviously
biased anti-feminist review for your information about it?
As opposed to a few obviously biased pro-feminist reviews? I've seen
more than one negative review. Not all of them are from "conservative"
papers.
No, I haven't seen it. Have you?
I've seen it. As a hetero guy, I was not offended, nor did I get the
"vitriolic anti-male" vibe that people are taking from it. It had its
moments...but that's the thing about artistic expression: it's subject to
interpretation. I will say I thought it was "OK" in terms of enjoyment
(definitely some funny and some poignant moments) and certainly thought
provoking- but some parts were better than others. I think it's supposed
to make you uncomfortable. Would we prefer our art to be perfectly PC? I
hope not.
Personally, I think JTEM has a point: it's pretty disrespectful to protest
what the v-day folks are trying to promote which is, after all, awareness of
violence and other abuse of women. I personally find their protest to be in
kind of poor taste especially in that context. And it does suggest a certain
insecurity. *Nevertheless*, there's certainly a giggle factor involved in
vagina-shaped lollipops and some of the people who take it *way* too
seriously... it's bound to get ridiculed. So, fine- ridicule away. It's
crazy to "ban" the P-day thing. Jeez, just laugh it off and go on. Assuming
their protests were actually banned (and not just prevented from interfering
with the v-day functions, which would be understandable) it's clearly a form
of censorship, which is to be opposed in all cases. Yes, I believe the Klan
should be allowed to rally on MLK day, too (not that the P-day thing is
anything like the Klan, mind you, just saying that you don't have to agree
with someone's POV to want them to be able to express it).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
04 May 2005 06:48:45 AM |
|
|
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in
news:jKidnR_Arv1_w-XfRVn-hQ@giganews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1115161475.589c6cc1b3288c20353a15f619fc5e43@teranews...
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:getf71h56mv559m4odc1q84lm31ogquj7r@4ax.com:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 20:30:13 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:gvkf71lrkhdf1vrn2budo95g3eq6tgmduq@4ax.com:
On Tue, 03 May 2005 11:41:39 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
AckbarJedi <AckbarDEATHJediTO@hotSPAMmail.com> wrote in
news:d57618$cmp$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu:
JTEM wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters
Eve Ensler's play The Vagina Monologues and schools
across the nation celebrate "V- Day" (short for Vagina
Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained
on the celebrations of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day
and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror.
Um, "Fred," even someone of your stature must understand
that there's a difference between killing someone because
they're trying to butcher your mother & killing someone
because they think oranges taste better than apples.
"Motives" makes a difference to us humans, a very large
difference.
Concerning motives: Reading what I quote above, what
impression do you get?
Hint: "Rained on the celebrations of V-Day"
Bigger hint: "Satire"
Hint: "Freedom of expression".
Bigger hint: "Liberal Double Standards".
What would you think of these self-described Republicans
if they went out of their way to "Rain on the celebrations
of Passover"?
I find it hilarious that JTEM compares "Vagina Day", celebrating a
vulgar play that glorifies child abuse, with a cultural and
religious holiday like Passover.
Which part of the play glorifies child abuse?
The scene where the older woman seduces the underage girl.
"Its only romantic scene, if you can call it that, takes place when
a 24-year-old woman seduces a young girl (in the original version
she was 13 years old, but in a more recent version is played as a
16-year-old.) The woman invites the girl into her car, takes her to
her house, plies her with vodka, and seduces her. What might seem
like a scene from a public-service kidnapping-prevention video shown
to schoolchildren becomes, in Ensler’s play “a kind of heaven.”
That just says that it happens in the play. It is described in some
detail and some people have found it offensive but that's art for
you. Where, though, is it glorified?
http://research.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/vag_mon.html
[discussion thread]
Hi everyone,
I want to amend my earlier comment about the performance of The
Vagina Monologues that we saw in Detroit; it seems that my
description is confusing folks.
The monologue by the 13-year-old girl who was seduced by an older
woman was performed. However, in the published text of the work,
there is a concluding paragraph that was not performed. The
paragraph says, in part, "Now people say that it was a kind of rape.
I was only thirteen and she was twenty-four. Well, I say, if it was
a rape, it was a good rape then, a rape that turned my sorry-*****
coochi-snorcher [vagina] into a kind of heaven" (75).
The decision to leave these lines out of the performance troubles me
quite a bit, although I can imagine why people would be reluctant to
say "good rape" out loud in any setting.
Have you seen the play, or are you just relying on one obviously
biased anti-feminist review for your information about it?
As opposed to a few obviously biased pro-feminist reviews? I've seen
more than one negative review. Not all of them are from
"conservative" papers.
No, I haven't seen it. Have you?
I've seen it. As a hetero guy, I was not offended, nor did I get the
"vitriolic anti-male" vibe that people are taking from it. It had its
moments...but that's the thing about artistic expression: it's subject
to interpretation.
That's the problem, though. Liberals in general are more than happy to
"tolerate" this form of artistic expression but anything that questions
their dogma? Look out, here come the PC Police.
I will say I thought it was "OK" in terms of
enjoyment (definitely some funny and some poignant moments) and
certainly thought provoking- but some parts were better than others.
I think it's supposed to make you uncomfortable. Would we prefer our
art to be perfectly PC? I hope not.
The Vagina Monologues *IS* perfectly PC. It's OK to bash males,
especially white males. But don't even *hint* that a feminist might be
exaggerating a little.
The P-day folks are just making fun of the pompous and *serious*
feminists with their *****-shaped candy and their "I (heart) my Vagina"
stickers.
Personally, I think JTEM has a point: it's pretty disrespectful to
protest what the v-day folks are trying to promote which is, after
all, awareness of violence and other abuse of women.
And that's another problem. Why do we have to be respectful of people
who go out of their way to exaggerate and blame us for everything any
man ever did wrong? Yes, there is violence and abuse in the world. From
what I've read about it (more than I cared to, believe me) the Vagina
Monologues act like there is hardly anything else. All the men but one
are rapists or torturers. Where is the supportive, strong male? *****,
where is the happy airheaded boy-toy? Nowhere to be found.
I personally find
their protest to be in kind of poor taste especially in that context.
And it does suggest a certain insecurity. *Nevertheless*, there's
certainly a giggle factor involved in vagina-shaped lollipops and some
of the people who take it *way* too seriously... it's bound to get
ridiculed. So, fine- ridicule away. It's crazy to "ban" the P-day
thing. Jeez, just laugh it off and go on.
That's the whole problem with liberal "causes". They'll all taken *way*
too seriously. Can't make jokes about them, can't even *question* their
premises.
Assuming their protests were
actually banned (and not just prevented from interfering with the
v-day functions, which would be understandable) it's clearly a form
of censorship, which is to be opposed in all cases. Yes, I believe the
Klan should be allowed to rally on MLK day, too (not that the P-day
thing is anything like the Klan, mind you, just saying that you don't
have to agree with someone's POV to want them to be able to express
it).
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mephisto" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
05 May 2005 04:39:45 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 04 May 2005 11:48:45 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
And that's another problem. Why do we have to be respectful of people
who go out of their way to exaggerate and blame us for everything any
man ever did wrong? Yes, there is violence and abuse in the world. From
what I've read about it (more than I cared to, believe me) the Vagina
Monologues act like there is hardly anything else.
How do you know how it 'acts' when you haven't actually bothered to go
and see it? The play is not about men at all. It does not exaggerate
the blame, nor does it bang on about men for the entire play. You
obviously haven't even bothered to read the script, but still you
believe you are qualified to tell everyone what it's about.
All the men but one
are rapists or torturers. Where is the supportive, strong male? *****,
where is the happy airheaded boy-toy? Nowhere to be found.
It is not a play about men. If you're suggesting that every single
play MUST have a positive male role model then you're just being
silly. There are thousands of plays and TV shows and films that
portray women in a negative way and have no decent female role models,
but I don't hear you shouting about them.
The play presents one perspective, based on the experiences of some
women. You may not agree with it, but your rabid reaction to a play
that you haven't even seen puts you up there with the idiots who
restricted people's freedom of expression on the campus in the
original article.
Mephisto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
05 May 2005 09:42:21 AM |
|
|
Mephisto <mephisto@go.away> wrote in
news:ieqj71l8q76q8eranbqplj5m8v18uk1kt8@4ax.com:
On Wed, 04 May 2005 11:48:45 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
And that's another problem. Why do we have to be respectful of people
who go out of their way to exaggerate and blame us for everything any
man ever did wrong? Yes, there is violence and abuse in the world.
From what I've read about it (more than I cared to, believe me) the
Vagina Monologues act like there is hardly anything else.
How do you know how it 'acts' when you haven't actually bothered to go
and see it?
By reading the numerous reviews and discussion threads about it on the
internet.
The play is not about men at all. It does not exaggerate
the blame, nor does it bang on about men for the entire play.
True, mostly it appears that it doesn't mention men at all. The few
mentions men get are as rapists or abusers, except for "Bob".
You
obviously haven't even bothered to read the script, but still you
believe you are qualified to tell everyone what it's about.
So what?
All the men but one
are rapists or torturers. Where is the supportive, strong male? *****,
where is the happy airheaded boy-toy? Nowhere to be found.
It is not a play about men. If you're suggesting that every single
play MUST have a positive male role model then you're just being
silly. There are thousands of plays and TV shows and films that
portray women in a negative way and have no decent female role models,
but I don't hear you shouting about them.
I don't see anybody else making a Big Deal about them either. When was
the last time anybody declared a fake holiday complete with stickers and
candies to celebrate one of those TV shows or films you mention?
The play presents one perspective, based on the experiences of some
women. You may not agree with it, but your rabid reaction to a play
that you haven't even seen puts you up there with the idiots who
restricted people's freedom of expression on the campus in the
original article.
Oh, spare me. I'm not suggesting that the play be banned. Get over
yourself.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dale" |
|
| Title: Re: Free Testaclese! |
03 May 2005 12:42:53 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1115088894.0d711038c5b39e100d59360fbb933321@teranews...
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/sommers200505020808.asp
College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters Eve Ensler's
play The Vagina Monologues and schools across the nation celebrate "V-
Day" (short for Vagina Day) every year. But when the College Republicans
at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island rained on the celebrations
of V-Day by inaugurating Penis Day and staging a satire called The Penis
Monologues, the official reaction was horror. Two participating
students, Monique Stuart and Andy Mainiero, have just received sharp
letters of reprimand and have been placed on probation by the Office of
Judicial Affairs. The costume of the P-Day "mascot" - a friendly looking
"penis" named Testaclese, has been confiscated and is under lock and key
in the office of the assistant dean of student affairs, John King.
Though I'm quite liberal, I do get tired of these women shoving their
vaginas into my face, and I think it's high time we men gave them tit for
tat! I say, if those p*ssies can't take what they dish out, f*ck 'em!
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|