| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Bonfire of the Deities..." |
| Date: |
05 Jan 2006 05:41:09 PM |
| Object: |
Fw: Commentary: Intelligent Design: Foolish Darwinians |
<jrsp8s@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:i6bvf.49526$q%.32197@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"NashtOn" <nana@na.ca> wrote in message
news:Xp7vf.150045$Ph4.4577747@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
Robert J. Kolker wrote:
Jason Spaceman wrote:
So with the evidence now in, why are the Darwinians steadfastly
defending their system? Simple. Because materialistic, naturalistic
evolution has never been primarily about science. It has always been
about denying the obvious existence of God.
If the existence of God were obvious this NG would not exist. Science is
not about denying the existence of God. Science is stone silent on the
question of the existence of God. It has nothing to say about it.
Nothing.
The question of God's existence is not resolvable by empirical means.
Which indicates that it is either metaphysical or nonsensical.
Bob Kolker
You seem to have an answer for everything, Kolker.
The proof of God's existence is all around you, just open your eyes.
The only way to see God's existence with your eyes open is with the
assistance of an opiate or a narcotic.
Indeed. And what's more, we should all stop and ask ourselves what kind of
deluded wing-nut someone has to be in order to stand there and blandly
assert that 'science has nothing to say on the question of the existence of
God': fact is, the Judaeo-Christian 'god', like every other, has had its
imaginary ***** whipped so many times that it has gradually -- and rather
recently! -- been forced to change into something that is so conveniently
and charmingly 'metaphysical' that it now *can't be tested for*. Prior to
this vital re-definition, of course, their 'God' was very physically and
very decisively *all over the place*: he would smite, speak, shout, burn,
knock down, blow over, part, raise up, appear, disappear, command, make ill,
make well, kill, resurrect, turn to salt, and even show his 'rear parts' --
yes, the very same buttocks that, if they ever went so far as to actually
fucking *exist*, would be smarting from the protracted smacking that science
has given them. And under the impact of this multi-dimensional scientific
onslaught on ancient stupidity -- the 'War on Error', as we ought to call
it -- there soon came to be *nothing left*: the 'God' these people still
love to speak of is nowadays *utterly unconnected* with the terrible figure
feared by the ancients. He's now nothing but a milk-sop, pantywaist idol; a
god that *can't ever do anything*; an *impotent, non-interventionist
phantom* -- who, though he is grandly supposed to have first 'created' our
entire universe (something which, incidentally, the 'Bible' doesn't actually
claim), and then to have spent century upon century controlling it and
interfering in it on a daily basis, now can't be held actually to *do* or
*be* anything that has *any empirically detectable aspect whatsoever*!! What
kind of fucking come-down is *that*...?!? He 'really, really, really,
exists', oh yes; and he's 'really, really, really great and all-powerful' --
but the moment these credulous fools actually risk claiming that he's *doing
anything specific in the world*, they're sunk -- because the unavoidable
empirical traces of such 'doing' will be *completely and crushingly
absent*...
To those of us who live in the real world, science actually has *this* to
say 'on the question of the existence of God':
"Look, every time we search in a place you say your 'god' is, for signs that
you say we'll find of the things that you say your 'god' has done, all we
discover is that you idiots have suddenly changed the definition again to
prevent it being 'a problem' that we didn't bloody find anything. You're
*wasting our time*: you have a 'god' without actions; a 'god' without
qualities' -- a 'god' who isn't even fucking *there*..."
Bonf.
.
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: AQOTM Nomination (Was: Re: Fw: Commentary: Intelligent Design: Foolish Darwinians) |
06 Jan 2006 10:06:15 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:41:09 -0600, Bonfire of the Deities...' wrote
(in article <p8ivf.70592$7p5.6877@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>):
<jrsp8s@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:i6bvf.49526$q%.32197@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
Snip
The only way to see God's existence with your eyes open is with the
assistance of an opiate or a narcotic.
Indeed. And what's more, we should all stop and ask ourselves what kind of
deluded wing-nut someone has to be in order to stand there and blandly
assert that 'science has nothing to say on the question of the existence of
God': fact is, the Judaeo-Christian 'god', like every other, has had its
imaginary ***** whipped so many times that it has gradually -- and rather
recently! -- been forced to change into something that is so conveniently
and charmingly 'metaphysical' that it now *can't be tested for*. Prior to
this vital re-definition, of course, their 'God' was very physically and
very decisively *all over the place*: he would smite, speak, shout, burn,
knock down, blow over, part, raise up, appear, disappear, command, make ill,
make well, kill, resurrect, turn to salt, and even show his 'rear parts' --
yes, the very same buttocks that, if they ever went so far as to actually
fucking *exist*, would be smarting from the protracted smacking that science
has given them. And under the impact of this multi-dimensional scientific
onslaught on ancient stupidity -- the 'War on Error', as we ought to call
it -- there soon came to be *nothing left*: the 'God' these people still
love to speak of is nowadays *utterly unconnected* with the terrible figure
feared by the ancients. He's now nothing but a milk-sop, pantywaist idol; a
god that *can't ever do anything*; an *impotent, non-interventionist
phantom* -- who, though he is grandly supposed to have first 'created' our
entire universe (something which, incidentally, the 'Bible' doesn't actually
claim), and then to have spent century upon century controlling it and
interfering in it on a daily basis, now can't be held actually to *do* or
*be* anything that has *any empirically detectable aspect whatsoever*!! What
kind of fucking come-down is *that*...?!? He 'really, really, really,
exists', oh yes; and he's 'really, really, really great and all-powerful' --
but the moment these credulous fools actually risk claiming that he's *doing
anything specific in the world*, they're sunk -- because the unavoidable
empirical traces of such 'doing' will be *completely and crushingly
absent*...
To those of us who live in the real world, science actually has *this* to
say 'on the question of the existence of God':
"Look, every time we search in a place you say your 'god' is, for signs that
you say we'll find of the things that you say your 'god' has done, all we
discover is that you idiots have suddenly changed the definition again to
prevent it being 'a problem' that we didn't bloody find anything. You're
*wasting our time*: you have a 'god' without actions; a 'god' without
qualities' -- a 'god' who isn't even fucking *there*..."
Bonf.
Seconds?
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
"(St. Paul)... preached holy acrimony, which is another
name for marriage."-12/31/95 issue of National Review
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanitys little helper" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination (Was: Re: Fw: Commentary: Intelligent Design: Foolish Darwinians) |
06 Jan 2006 10:59:24 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:06:15 -0600, Harry F. Leopold wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:41:09 -0600, Bonfire of the Deities...' wrote
(in article <p8ivf.70592$7p5.6877@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>):
<jrsp8s@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:i6bvf.49526$q%.32197@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
Snip
The only way to see God's existence with your eyes open is with the
assistance of an opiate or a narcotic.
Indeed. And what's more, we should all stop and ask ourselves what kind of
deluded wing-nut someone has to be in order to stand there and blandly
assert that 'science has nothing to say on the question of the existence of
God': fact is, the Judaeo-Christian 'god', like every other, has had its
imaginary ***** whipped so many times that it has gradually -- and rather
recently! -- been forced to change into something that is so conveniently
and charmingly 'metaphysical' that it now *can't be tested for*. Prior to
this vital re-definition, of course, their 'God' was very physically and
very decisively *all over the place*: he would smite, speak, shout, burn,
knock down, blow over, part, raise up, appear, disappear, command, make ill,
make well, kill, resurrect, turn to salt, and even show his 'rear parts' --
yes, the very same buttocks that, if they ever went so far as to actually
fucking *exist*, would be smarting from the protracted smacking that science
has given them. And under the impact of this multi-dimensional scientific
onslaught on ancient stupidity -- the 'War on Error', as we ought to call
it -- there soon came to be *nothing left*: the 'God' these people still
love to speak of is nowadays *utterly unconnected* with the terrible figure
feared by the ancients. He's now nothing but a milk-sop, pantywaist idol; a
god that *can't ever do anything*; an *impotent, non-interventionist
phantom* -- who, though he is grandly supposed to have first 'created' our
entire universe (something which, incidentally, the 'Bible' doesn't actually
claim), and then to have spent century upon century controlling it and
interfering in it on a daily basis, now can't be held actually to *do* or
*be* anything that has *any empirically detectable aspect whatsoever*!! What
kind of fucking come-down is *that*...?!? He 'really, really, really,
exists', oh yes; and he's 'really, really, really great and all-powerful' --
but the moment these credulous fools actually risk claiming that he's *doing
anything specific in the world*, they're sunk -- because the unavoidable
empirical traces of such 'doing' will be *completely and crushingly
absent*...
To those of us who live in the real world, science actually has *this* to
say 'on the question of the existence of God':
"Look, every time we search in a place you say your 'god' is, for signs that
you say we'll find of the things that you say your 'god' has done, all we
discover is that you idiots have suddenly changed the definition again to
prevent it being 'a problem' that we didn't bloody find anything. You're
*wasting our time*: you have a 'god' without actions; a 'god' without
qualities' -- a 'god' who isn't even fucking *there*..."
Bonf.
Seconds?
In absolutely no respect whatsoever, in the entire realm of possibility,
could I have put that better myself.
Seconded!
--
Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow, we eat, drink and be merry.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination (Was: Re: Fw: Commentary: Intelligent Design: Foolish Darwinians) |
08 Jan 2006 07:08:16 AM |
|
|
In article <1v7ww5g4giwi8.1hmoncbl81w9z.dlg@40tude.net>,
Sanity's little helper <elvish@noshpam.net> wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:06:15 -0600, Harry F. Leopold wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:41:09 -0600, Bonfire of the Deities...' wrote
(in article <p8ivf.70592$7p5.6877@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>):
<jrsp8s@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:i6bvf.49526$q%.32197@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
Snip
The only way to see God's existence with your eyes open is with the
assistance of an opiate or a narcotic.
Indeed. And what's more, we should all stop and ask ourselves what kind of
deluded wing-nut someone has to be in order to stand there and blandly
assert that 'science has nothing to say on the question of the existence
of
God': fact is, the Judaeo-Christian 'god', like every other, has had its
imaginary ***** whipped so many times that it has gradually -- and rather
recently! -- been forced to change into something that is so conveniently
and charmingly 'metaphysical' that it now *can't be tested for*. Prior to
this vital re-definition, of course, their 'God' was very physically and
very decisively *all over the place*: he would smite, speak, shout, burn,
knock down, blow over, part, raise up, appear, disappear, command, make
ill,
make well, kill, resurrect, turn to salt, and even show his 'rear parts'
--
yes, the very same buttocks that, if they ever went so far as to actually
fucking *exist*, would be smarting from the protracted smacking that
science
has given them. And under the impact of this multi-dimensional scientific
onslaught on ancient stupidity -- the 'War on Error', as we ought to call
it -- there soon came to be *nothing left*: the 'God' these people still
love to speak of is nowadays *utterly unconnected* with the terrible
figure
feared by the ancients. He's now nothing but a milk-sop, pantywaist idol;
a
god that *can't ever do anything*; an *impotent, non-interventionist
phantom* -- who, though he is grandly supposed to have first 'created' our
entire universe (something which, incidentally, the 'Bible' doesn't
actually
claim), and then to have spent century upon century controlling it and
interfering in it on a daily basis, now can't be held actually to *do* or
*be* anything that has *any empirically detectable aspect whatsoever*!!
What
kind of fucking come-down is *that*...?!? He 'really, really, really,
exists', oh yes; and he's 'really, really, really great and all-powerful'
--
but the moment these credulous fools actually risk claiming that he's
*doing
anything specific in the world*, they're sunk -- because the unavoidable
empirical traces of such 'doing' will be *completely and crushingly
absent*...
To those of us who live in the real world, science actually has *this* to
say 'on the question of the existence of God':
"Look, every time we search in a place you say your 'god' is, for signs
that
you say we'll find of the things that you say your 'god' has done, all we
discover is that you idiots have suddenly changed the definition again to
prevent it being 'a problem' that we didn't bloody find anything. You're
*wasting our time*: you have a 'god' without actions; a 'god' without
qualities' -- a 'god' who isn't even fucking *there*..."
Bonf.
Seconds?
In absolutely no respect whatsoever, in the entire realm of possibility,
could I have put that better myself.
Seconded!
Recorded.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|