Religions > Atheism > Gandy challenge - day 2 - Process metaphyics is basis of science?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"wcb" |
| Date: |
12 Sep 2006 07:42:43 AM |
| Object: |
Gandy challenge - day 2 - Process metaphyics is basis of science? |
Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
Barwell:
Bwahahahahahahahahahhah! Only by process theology Dweebs!
There is not a single well known leading scientist that
can be quoted with a specific quote that says that at all.
When I last challenged you brazen lies on this, you to back
that up, sprayed AA down with lots of crap you dredged
from google, not a single one which showed this claim!
If some bozo had babbled nonsense and quoted from Whitehead
and then from Feynman, it got put here even when it these
quotes had nothing to do with each other!
You did this three times, you deeply incompetent idiot!
Of the numerous bits of crap you spewed here, not one, not one,
had anything to do with any well known physicists accepting
process bull doo doo.
You lied and got caught and got laughed at as a lying and
incompetent fool!
Again, the challenge stands!
Show us a quote from any really famous physicists that
say that; "Whitehead's philosophy is now acclaimed as the
philosophy behind modern science."
Show us any really great, well known working physicists
this day who say that!
Or admit you are wrong and had no idea what you were babbling
about when you posted you foolish and false claim!
NO! Do not spam us with crap you google up and spray here
without ever reading that turns out to ALL have nothing to
do with process stupidity and science.
SPECIFIC QUOTES! FROM PHYSICISTS! FROM WELL KNOWN WORKING SCIENTISTS!
Put them here.
---------------->
I will post this challenge ever day until you comply to show you are
a lying, stupid *****. Or until you admit you shot your intellectually
incompetent mouth off with having any reason to have made your foolish
claim.
--
Where did all these braindead morons come from!
What diseased sewer did they breed in and how did
they manage to find their way out on their own?
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell challenge - day 2 - Barwell's Fundie-Style Lies |
12 Sep 2006 12:07:39 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12gdargor5e0cfc@corp.supernews.com...
Gandy
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12gc6pn6ooss367@corp.supernews.com...
Barwell states:
When I dug up articles where the PT crew admitted
their PT god didn't exactly work,
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
This is equivalent to saying that when Stephen Jay Gould proposed the theory
of punctuated equilibrium as a better explanation of evolution and Jerry
Falwell said that he didn't believe in Evolution that meant that "the
evolution crew admitted their theory doesn't work."
An obvious and blatant lie, and one that well-read atheists know is used by
the creationist/Intelligent Design Fundamentalistsall the time.
Yet on exactly the same kind of evidence, Barwell states that the "PT crew
admitted their PT god didn't exactly work." An almost perfect copy of a
blatant fundamentalist tactical lie.
Since when do critics of a subject constitute the proponents of a subject?
I.e., a "crew."?
I'll be posting this in response to any of Bawell's bogus 'challenges' or
until he admits that he lied through his teeth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Gandys furious ad hominem attack - his response to challenging his idiot claims. |
12 Sep 2006 10:19:40 PM |
|
|
I'll be posting this in response to any of Bawell's bogus 'challenges' or
until he admits that he lied through his teeth.
The only liar here is you.
So, you aren't going to show us any quotes here and well known and creidble
scientists admits Whiteheads process metaphysics is
the basis of modern science like you lied?
Instead of supporting yoiur claim you are going to froth and foam and spew
angry ad hominems at me to divert attention from your ignorant claims?
---------
Gandy's claim.
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
There is not a single well known leading scientist that
can be quoted with a specific quote that says that at all.
Show us a quote from any really famous physicists that
say that; "Whitehead's philosophy is now acclaimed as the
philosophy behind modern science."
Or admit you are wrong and had no idea what you were babbling
about when you posted you foolish and false claim!
SPECIFIC QUOTES! FROM WELL KNOWN WORKING SCIENTISTS!
Put them here.
---------------->
I will post this challenge ever day until you comply, to show you are
a lying, stupid *****. Or until you admit you shot your intellectually
incompetent mouth off with having any reason to have made your foolish
claim and admit this was a gross error on your part.
--
Where did all these braindead morons come from!
What diseased sewer did they breed in and how did
they manage to find their way out on their own?
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious ad hominem attack - his response to challenging his idiot claims. |
12 Sep 2006 11:43:40 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12geu7phse6vkca@corp.supernews.com...
I'll be posting this in response to any of Bawell's bogus 'challenges' or
until he admits that he lied through his teeth.
The only liar here is you.
We have to probably call this A Mass of Lies.
When are you going to retract them all, Barney?
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12eq0glflosh03d@corp.supernews.com...
I tweaked my essay a bit to put things more
accurately. Over 35 years the mainstream religions
failed to utilize their large numbers to effectively
draw a line in the sand and end these policies of
supporting genocide and evil.
They were at best feeble and uncertain
where they should most certainly been
uncompromising and resolute.
TRANSLATION: Your original essay was sheer crap. And this newest version
continues to contain a mass of blatant lies.
***********************************************************
The Failure of Christianity in America
W. C . Barwell 3-8-05
***********************************************************
1 Corinthians 14:8 For if the trumpet give an
uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle?
Since Nixon, this nation has rapidly moved quite far to the
right, taken there mainly by christian right wingers who have
fully supported the GOP, as it has moved specifically to
gain support of christian right wingers. This started when
Nixon played the racist Southern Strategy card building on
civil rights era resentments by far right Southerners.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/2/23/172743.shtml
Conservative Southerners were very religious. Among other
things, after desegregation many religious groups started their
ownprivate segregated schools. White Citizens Councils
were formed,many meeting in churches.
The turn towards Christian conservatives accelerated
under Reagan, who skillfully played the religious card, and the
religious right joined the GOP-Reagan revolution that still
is a major influence. That has given the GOP control of Congress
for years, especially thanks to Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott
who gained control of the Congress, House and Senate in 1995
with full support of the politicized religious right.
So we now have had a essentially a christian-GOP government
for 30 years.
That's a lie. What we have is a Fundamentalist-GOP government.
We had large right wing Christian movements
who were formed expressedly for political reasons to move
America right and to empower America conservative religionists,
and they have been largely successful.
RICHARD M. NIXON - GERALD FORD.
Christian denominations largely supported incompetent
and corrupt Vietnamese politicians. And a senseless war
in Vietnam that accomplished nothing, run by incompetents.
That's a lie. The world and national council of churches opposed the war.
Not many Christian denominations respected life here.
Or freedom. But supported Nixon heartily despite the
horrors we committed in Vietnam and Cambodia and Chile
and winked at support for others mentioned above.
Another lie. Many denominations opposed all of the above.
Not many major religious denominations nor their leaders
spoke out and drew a line at any of this.
That's a lie.
RONALD REAGAN 1981 - 1989
Ronald Reagan came to power largely because of the
religious right's politicization and support.
Throughout his administration Ronald Reagan supported
Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge as the official government
of note in Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge delegation
as the official UN delegation of Cambodia to the UN.
Aid is funneled to the Khmer Rouge including $81 million
dollars, and food and uniforms funneled through aid
organizations. Reagan winked as China rearmed Pol Pot,
and leaned on nations not to send aid to Cambodia despite
the devastation of nearly 1/3 of Cambodia's population
killed by Pol Pot's genocidal regime.
Early in his administration Reagan lead the GOP in
support for military aid to the genocidal Rios Montt
of Guatemala, who practiced wholesale mass torture,
mass rape mass murder and genocide on the Mayan Indians
of Guatemala.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/daily/march99/guatemala11.htm
Reagan and the GOP supported the mass murdering ex-Somoza
Guards of Nicaragua.
Reagan and the GOP supported Saddam Hussein of Iraq.
Reagan and the GOP supported the murderous Robert
D'Aubisson of El Salvador, a known far right death
squad leader.
The El Salvadoran government was involved in numerous
murders, and massacres, such as the killing of 400
villagers at a small village called El Mezote, most
of them young women and children.
http://www.usip.org/library/tc/doc/reports/el_salvador/tc_es_03151993_chron1.html
Reagan and the GOP supported Noriega of Panama.
Reagan and the GOP supported a number of murdering
far right extremist guerrilla movements in Africa including
the genocidal RENAMO in Mozambique.
The Christian and religious right heavily supported Reagan
and the GOP despite numerous examples of such evils as
listed above.
Another lie. You're again conflating any and all Christian denominations
with the religious right.
They're not the same.
The leaders of the religious right never cared
nor complained, and rarely did the religious leaders of the
main stream christian denominations make any effort
to stand up and denounce these outrageous policies.
No more rarely than atheists, Barwell.
The members of major denominations made little effort to
complain and demand their religious leaders react to
support for genocidal mass murderers.
Another lie.
Despite having 100 + millions of members, the main stream
denominations made little difference to Reagan and GOP
policies, vigorously supported by the religious right.
As did the atheists make little difference.
There was and is little real respect for life in organized
American christianity as these wholesale and repeat failures of
America christianity collectively over 35 years shows.
Another lie. Liberation theology alone has been instrumental in opposing
right wing dictatorships around the world and particularly in South America.
Action was mainly confined to small liberal denominations.
Another lie. The world council and national council of churches have both
liberal and conservative members.
What main stream denomination action was taken was feeble
and half hearted at best.
Another lie.
Many churches and denominations whole-heartedly support
Reagan and the GOP despite these horrors, and many
actively worked for Reagan's re-election and support of GOP
candidates, passing out tens of millions of voters' guides
slanted to support of far right GOP candiates and policies.
GEORGE W. BUSH
Bush continued support for the evil dictators above,
including Pinochet, Pol Pot and others. However,
Saddam screwed us and invaded Kuwait, mainly because
Bush screwed up and did not warn him to not do so
as Hussein repeatedly threatened to invade Kuwait
for nearly two months and coolly noted Bush's lack
of much response.
Bush did not act in case of genocide by Yugoslavia's
Milosevic, and Bush and the GOP's loud and obnoxious
foot-dragging here allowed Milosevic to kill
hundreds of thousands with near impunity.
The leaders of the GOP, House and Senate, and religious
leaders of the right
and mainstream denominations never
cared about any of this.
Another lie.
The main stream denominations
rarely made much of an issue out of it, and what was done
was as usual,feeble.
Another lie.
Few Christian leaders of either far right or mainstream
denominations cared, nor brought Bush and the GOP leadership
of House and Senate to task for this genocide of innocents.
Anothe lie as any search on the subject will show.
The voters' guides pushed in many churches still were demanding
parishioners vote GOP despite these horrors and mass murders.
In many fundamentalist churches.
Few leaders of large, powerful and influential denominations
ever stood up and denounced these mass murders.
Another lie.
Christians
underneath did not push dilatory and feebly responsive denominational
leaders to speak out, act and lead against these mass murders
and war crimes.
Another lie.
Nor the support early in Bush's career for
Saddam and Pop Pot and other genocidal monsters.
The far right churches as usual made no almost no efforts at all.
Duh!
Clinton:
Under Clinton this Iraq policy continued. Again, Christians
did not care.
Another lie.
All many Christians cared about was Clinton's
don't-ask-don't-tell gays in military policy and Clinton's
sex life and Whitewater. $47 million spent investigating
Whitewater while the Christian right roared with naked hate.
Money spent investigation mass murder in Iraq caused by
our purposeful by our sanctions? $0.
Roars of disprovable from Christian America over these mass
murders? Not much.
Roars from Atheist America? Just as few.
From the large far right religious
denominations there was next to no effort at all.
Duh!
No large denominations ever made these war crimes and
mass murders an issue
A blatant lie.
nor took the GOP or president to
task over these horrors in a manner tha ever made a
difference.
What has 35 years of right winged GOP government and right
winger christianity got us?
Sliding again, I see. Right winger christianity is not "christianity"
Barwell. Like the true demagogue you are, I can understand your feverish
desire to obscure that fact.
Mass murder, genocide,
Nothing but callousness, disregard for human life,
support for dictators, a near total moral failure of
religion, Christianity, GOP and the American right.
And atheists.
Not once did the large mass of religious christian
Americans, either leadership or rank and file ever
find any of these evils unacceptable
A blatant lie.
or punish any
who supported any of this by using their large
memberships to draw a distinct line and make it an
unavoidable issue despite having numbers to do just
that. Not the christian right nor leaders of
major US religious denominations made a real difference.
Nor atheists.
Most GOP House and Senate members were people who
did these things claimed to be christians.
and many are atheists.
Not one
cares, not many christian denominations care that
they did not care or act.
That's because they DID act, moron.
Christians posture as moral,
So do atheists.
American christians
have a very bad track records when it comes to
morality,
So do atheists.
Christianity thus can only be called a moral failure,
Under the terms of your argument, atheism can also be called a complete
moral failure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: richard hanson furious ad hominem attack - his response to challenging his idiot claims. |
22 Sep 2006 04:22:07 PM |
|
|
Lies, all lies.
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
The people criticizing were open critics of process philosophy.
You lied, Barwell. When are you going to admit it?
Why are you lying here when people can easily check
up on your bizarre and hate filled lies?
http://www.religion-online.org/
Process Studies Journal
Al this is from process theologysown journals!
Do you think people are so stupid they can't figure
this out if I post the URLs? Do you think nobody will
bother to check up and see what a brazen, pathological,
chronic liar you are?
123
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics by David Ray Griffin
Even Charles Hartshorne, the preeminent interpreter of process thinking,
admitted that he could not reconcile his doctrine of god with relativity
physics. The author discusses the dichotomy between the two ideas and
offers some solutions.
Griffin is a long time process theology proponent.
Why do you lie a lie so easily debunked?
because you just do not care if you are a liar found out!
You must be desperate to keep reposting this lie!
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious ad hominem attack - his response to challenging his idiot claims. |
13 Sep 2006 01:48:07 PM |
|
|
Quit trying to divert attention with lies, Hanson.
Answer the challenge you hateful lying *****.
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
This is the issue.
Dont try to make you other lies the issue.
--
Where did all these braindead morons come from!
What diseased sewer did they breed in and how did
they manage to find their way out on their own?
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious ad hominem attack - his response to challenging his idiot claims. |
13 Sep 2006 01:51:46 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12ggkkj6j6hn38d@corp.supernews.com...
Answer the challenge you hateful lying *****.
Took the words right out of my mouth, Barney.
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12gggnsiuima8eb@corp.supernews.com...
In the end, no major religious denominations save the
usual Menonnites and Quakers came out against Vietnam.
That's a blatant lie.
Dorothy Day, Peter Maurin and the Catholic Worker Movement ... Dorothy Day,
Prophet of Pacifism for the Catholic Church ... The influence of the
Catholic Worker during the Vietnam War is explored in detail in American ...
www.cjd.org/paper/pacifism.html - 26k - Cached - Similar pages
Roman Catholic The Roman Catholic Church is the largest religious
institution in the United ... and corporate actions that awakened Catholic
opposition to the Vietnam War. ...
www.soulforce.org/article/95 - 19k - Cached - Similar pages
Research Advisory Service - Doe/Moffitt Libraries ... Catholic Church's
Position on Vietnam War & Daniel Berrigan; Healthcare-Cuba ... African
Americans & Education; Catholic Opposition to Birth Control ...
www.lib.berkeley.edu/doemoff/ras_topics.html - 19k - Cached - Similar
pages
Crisis Magazine A noticeable feature of Catholic opposition to the war was
that, outside America ... The second, more radical view thought that the
Vietnam War had revealed ...
www.crisismagazine.com/october2003/feature2.htm - 32k - Cached -
Similar pages
US Christian Leaders Rally as Peacemakers "We're further along now than we
were in the Vietnam War. ... of the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops, hand-delivered a letter of opposition to ...
www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1102-07.htm - 18k - Cached - Similar
pages
Chapter 16 To the Catholic Church, however, Vietnam was more than a mere
stepping stone in ... The Catholic communities reacted in turn. From passive
opposition they ...
www.reformation.org/chapter16.html - 15k - Cached - Similar pages
Legendary liberal WW Finlator fought segregation, poverty, war Finlator,
longtime pastor of Pullen Memorial Baptist Church in Raleigh, ... including
opposition to the Vietnam War, support for women's rights, ...
www.abpnews.com/1307.article - 11k - Cached - Similar pages
Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr
Declaration of Independence from the War in Vietnam. Delivered by Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr April 1967 At Manhattan's Riverside Church ...
www.commondreams.org/views04/0115-13.htm - 37k - Cached - Similar
pages
First Baptist Church - History First Baptist declared its opposition to the
deportation of "refugees as long as persecution, torture and murder of
civilians continued." The church has ...
www.firstbaptistithaca.org/history.html - 7k - Cached - Similar pages
Opposition to the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The executive
committee of World Council of Churches, an organization joined by churches
.... Opposition to US foreign policy · Opposition to the Vietnam War ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_Iraq_War - 63k - Cached -
Similar pages
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: hanson's furious ad hominem attack - his response to challenging his idiot claims. |
22 Sep 2006 04:27:35 PM |
|
|
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
This is soooooo, stupid.
IA AN Richard Hanson! I am a liar! I never correct my
lies and respond with swarms of spammed hate attacks on those
who point out I am a wrongheaded liar!
I LIKE lying as it shows my contempt top all.
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
The people criticizing were open critics of process philosophy.
You lied, Barwell. When are you going to admit it?
Why are you lying here when people can easily check
up on your bizarre and hate filled lies?
http://www.religion-online.org/
Process Studies Journal
Al this is from process theologysown journals!
Do you think people are so stupid they can't figure
this out if I post the URLs? Do you think nobody will
bother to check up and see what a brazen, pathological,
chronic liar you are?
123
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics by David Ray Griffin
Even Charles Hartshorne, the preeminent interpreter of process thinking,
admitted that he could not reconcile his doctrine of god with relativity
physics. The author discusses the dichotomy between the two ideas and
offers some solutions.
Griffin is a long time process theology proponent.
Why do you lie a lie so easily debunked?
because you just do not care if you are a liar found out!
You must be desperate to keep reposting this lie!
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious ad hominem attack - his response to challenging his idiot claims. |
22 Sep 2006 04:37:00 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12h8lbmmtob93d3@corp.supernews.com...
I LIKE lying as it shows my contempt top all.
Not to mention a problem with dyslexia.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Gandy still has no answer |
22 Sep 2006 11:58:52 PM |
|
|
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
Hanson do you think bluster and lying is an answer?
This is not true.
Why not admit it? Too proud to admit you made a bad claim? Too proud to
admit you know nothing about the real foundations of science?
The foundations of science came from Galileo when he threw
out physics and started from scratch on a firmly empirical basis.
Almost all scientists know of Bacon and Galileo.
Others added to science, Planck, Einstein, Heisenberg.
Not Whitehead's metaphysics.
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell still has no answer to His Lies |
23 Sep 2006 12:27:12 AM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12ggh2hposvrt6f@corp.supernews.com...
Viet Nam war
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12gggnsiuima8eb@corp.supernews.com...
In the end, no major religious denominations save the
usual Menonnites and Quakers came out against Vietnam.
That's a blatant lie.
Dorothy Day, Peter Maurin and the Catholic Worker Movement ... Dorothy Day,
Prophet of Pacifism for the Catholic Church ... The influence of the
Catholic Worker during the Vietnam War is explored in detail in American ...
www.cjd.org/paper/pacifism.html - 26k - Cached - Similar pages
Roman Catholic The Roman Catholic Church is the largest religious
institution in the United ... and corporate actions that awakened Catholic
opposition to the Vietnam War. ...
www.soulforce.org/article/95 - 19k - Cached - Similar pages
Research Advisory Service - Doe/Moffitt Libraries ... Catholic Church's
Position on Vietnam War & Daniel Berrigan; Healthcare-Cuba ... African
Americans & Education; Catholic Opposition to Birth Control ...
www.lib.berkeley.edu/doemoff/ras_topics.html - 19k - Cached - Similar
pages
Crisis Magazine A noticeable feature of Catholic opposition to the war was
that, outside America ... The second, more radical view thought that the
Vietnam War had revealed ...
www.crisismagazine.com/october2003/feature2.htm - 32k - Cached -
Similar pages
US Christian Leaders Rally as Peacemakers "We're further along now than we
were in the Vietnam War. ... of the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops, hand-delivered a letter of opposition to ...
www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1102-07.htm - 18k - Cached - Similar
pages
Chapter 16 To the Catholic Church, however, Vietnam was more than a mere
stepping stone in ... The Catholic communities reacted in turn. From passive
opposition they ...
www.reformation.org/chapter16.html - 15k - Cached - Similar pages
Legendary liberal WW Finlator fought segregation, poverty, war Finlator,
longtime pastor of Pullen Memorial Baptist Church in Raleigh, ... including
opposition to the Vietnam War, support for women's rights, ...
www.abpnews.com/1307.article - 11k - Cached - Similar pages
Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr
Declaration of Independence from the War in Vietnam. Delivered by Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr April 1967 At Manhattan's Riverside Church ...
www.commondreams.org/views04/0115-13.htm - 37k - Cached - Similar
pages
First Baptist Church - History First Baptist declared its opposition to the
deportation of "refugees as long as persecution, torture and murder of
civilians continued." The church has ...
www.firstbaptistithaca.org/history.html - 7k - Cached - Similar pages
Opposition to the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The executive
committee of World Council of Churches, an organization joined by churches
.... Opposition to US foreign policy · Opposition to the Vietnam War ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_Iraq_War - 63k - Cached -
Similar pages
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Hanson and process theology, changes subject because he can't answer. |
23 Sep 2006 04:48:58 PM |
|
|
Why are you trying to change the subject Liar?
Its about you, process theology and science.
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
Then you lied!:
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
The people criticizing were open critics of process philosophy.
You lied, Barwell. When are you going to admit it?
Why are you lying here when people can easily check
up on your bizarre and hate filled lies?
http://www.religion-online.org/
Process Studies Journal
Al this is from process theologysown journals!
Do you think people are so stupid they can't figure
this out if I post the URLs? Do you think nobody will
bother to check up and see what a brazen, pathological,
chronic liar you are?
123
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics by David Ray Griffin
Even Charles Hartshorne, the preeminent interpreter of process thinking,
admitted that he could not reconcile his doctrine of god with relativity
physics. The author discusses the dichotomy between the two ideas and
offers some solutions.
Griffin is a long time process theology proponent.
Why do you lie a lie so easily debunked?
because you just do not care if you are a liar found out!
You must be desperate to keep reposting this lie!
Now you change the subject because you weary of being
shown to be a liar!
Admit you lied about proces stheoolofgy and science.
Admit you lied about what I posted, from process theology experts, not
hostile critics?
Hanson, do you ever stop lying, lying, lying?
And again, 35 years of US support for genocide and mass murders and
dictators and in all that time, main stream religions collectively with
100+ members failed to say "Stop!" forcefully and using their numbers to
force change on the government.
Failure plain and simple.
But changing to THAT subject is rank incompetence
on your part.
As long as you take it on yourself to attack me everytime I post, I will
keep your rank incompetence and thorough dishoinesty on display so people
will realize I am being attacked by an idiot and a totally dishonest idiot
at that.
You could say "I was wrong about process metaphysics being basis of modern
science".
"I pulled that out of my ***** and I didn't check my claim and no scientists
can be quoted to prove that.
I withdraw that."
But that would take a man and you are not a man.
Desperate changing of subjects will not make this go away as
long as you insist on spwewing crap in AA.
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell and His Smears |
23 Sep 2006 09:31:53 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12ggo27ep3ohf80@corp.supernews.com...
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
And Barwell selectively edited a single article that WAS IN FACT A DEFENSE
OF PROCESS THEOLOGY.
What's interesting about Barwell's attack is that it is precisely the same
kind of attack that we expect from the Creationist Fundamentalists. He
noticed an internal debate within the process philosophy community and is
now pretending that the PT community has "admitted" that PT doesn't work.
All of that is precisely like saying that scientists have admitted that
Darwinian Evolution is false because Stephen Gould proposed the theory of
punctuated equilibrium.
Barwell has now emerged as, not only a vicious liar, but a man willing to
adopt the techniques and political rhetoric of the religious right in an
effort to silence his critics.
I've appended the conclusions of the article that Barwell attempted to
misrepresent so that the group can see the extent to which Barwell is
willing to go to spread his lies.
Anyone wishing to read the entire article can go to.
http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=2829
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics
by David Ray Griffin
[excerpt]
Summary
The idea that the special theory of relativity creates problems for
temporalistic theisms, such as that of Whitehead and especially Hartshorne
arises from a combination of a fact and an assumption. The fact is that this
theory does not provide the basis for a cosmic "now." The assumption is that
this theory has ontological implications for the truth about time. Combining
the fact and the assumption creates the idea that special relativity physics
rules out the possibility of a cosmic "now." And that idea, if true, would
seem to rule out the possible truth of temporalistic theisms in which God
and the world interact.
But we need not assume that special relativity physics has ontological
implications for the nature of time. One way to relativize its status is to
postulate a form of efficient causation that influences distant events
instantaneously. In Whiteheadian terms, the principle that contemporaries do
not interact causally is still affirmed, because the instantaneous influence
is exerted only after an occasion achieves satisfaction. This proposal,
which I prefer, is aligned with some positions currently proposed by
physicists, in which a cosmic "now" based on instantaneous effects is
affirmed. A second way to reconcile temporalistic theism and relativity
physics is simply to see the latter as having no ontological implications
about time whatsoever, so that the possibility of a cosmic "now" is left
open, then postulating that a cosmic "now" does exist for God by virtue of
God's all-inclusive standpoint. This second proposal is in harmony with
suggestions by temporalistic theists beyond the process camp.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Gandy and His Smears |
23 Sep 2006 11:07:38 PM |
|
|
Gandalf Grey repeats his tiresome lies.
Hanson, how many times are you going to post easily debunked lies?
Til everybody oin teh net KNOWS you are a liar?
There seems to be something deeply wrong with you.
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
The people criticizing were open critics of process philosophy.
You lied, Barwell. When are you going to admit it?
Why are you lying here when people can easily check
up on your bizarre and hate filled lies?
http://www.religion-online.org/
Process Studies Journal
All this is from process theology's own journals!
Do you think people are so stupid they can't figure
this out if I post the URLs? Do you think nobody will
bother to check up and see what a brazen, pathological,
chronic liar you are?
123
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics by David Ray Griffin
Even Charles Hartshorne, the preeminent interpreter of process thinking,
admitted that he could not reconcile his doctrine of god with relativity
physics. The author discusses the dichotomy between the two ideas and
offers some solutions.
Griffin is a long time process theology proponent.
Why do you lie a lie so easily debunked?
because you just do not care if you are a liar found out!
You must be desperate to keep reposting this lie!
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell and His Smears |
23 Sep 2006 11:55:40 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12ggo27ep3ohf80@corp.supernews.com...
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
And Barwell selectively edited a single article that WAS IN FACT A DEFENSE
OF PROCESS THEOLOGY.
What's interesting about Barwell's attack is that it is precisely the same
kind of attack that we expect from the Creationist Fundamentalists. He
noticed an internal debate within the process philosophy community and is
now pretending that the PT community has "admitted" that PT doesn't work.
All of that is precisely like saying that scientists have admitted that
Darwinian Evolution is false because Stephen Gould proposed the theory of
punctuated equilibrium.
Barwell has now emerged as, not only a vicious liar, but a man willing to
adopt the techniques and political rhetoric of the religious right in an
effort to silence his critics.
I've appended the conclusions of the article that Barwell attempted to
misrepresent so that the group can see the extent to which Barwell is
willing to go to spread his lies.
Anyone wishing to read the entire article can go to.
http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=2829
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics
by David Ray Griffin
[excerpt]
Summary
The idea that the special theory of relativity creates problems for
temporalistic theisms, such as that of Whitehead and especially Hartshorne
arises from a combination of a fact and an assumption. The fact is that this
theory does not provide the basis for a cosmic "now." The assumption is that
this theory has ontological implications for the truth about time. Combining
the fact and the assumption creates the idea that special relativity physics
rules out the possibility of a cosmic "now." And that idea, if true, would
seem to rule out the possible truth of temporalistic theisms in which God
and the world interact.
But we need not assume that special relativity physics has ontological
implications for the nature of time. One way to relativize its status is to
postulate a form of efficient causation that influences distant events
instantaneously. In Whiteheadian terms, the principle that contemporaries do
not interact causally is still affirmed, because the instantaneous influence
is exerted only after an occasion achieves satisfaction. This proposal,
which I prefer, is aligned with some positions currently proposed by
physicists, in which a cosmic "now" based on instantaneous effects is
affirmed. A second way to reconcile temporalistic theism and relativity
physics is simply to see the latter as having no ontological implications
about time whatsoever, so that the possibility of a cosmic "now" is left
open, then postulating that a cosmic "now" does exist for God by virtue of
God's all-inclusive standpoint. This second proposal is in harmony with
suggestions by temporalistic theists beyond the process camp.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell and His Smears |
23 Sep 2006 11:09:12 PM |
|
|
Gandalf Grey wrote:
"I haven't told a gross lie in a WHOLE HOUR!
I MUST GET ON LINE AND LIE!". Pant! Pant!
Gandy, get help.
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
The people criticizing were open critics of process philosophy.
You lied, Barwell. When are you going to admit it?
Why are you lying here when people can easily check
up on your bizarre and hate filled lies?
http://www.religion-online.org/
Process Studies Journal
Al this is from process theologysown journals!
Do you think people are so stupid they can't figure
this out if I post the URLs? Do you think nobody will
bother to check up and see what a brazen, pathological,
chronic liar you are?
123
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics by David Ray Griffin
Even Charles Hartshorne, the preeminent interpreter of process thinking,
admitted that he could not reconcile his doctrine of god with relativity
physics. The author discusses the dichotomy between the two ideas and
offers some solutions.
Griffin is a long time process theology proponent.
Why do you lie a lie so easily debunked?
because you just do not care if you are a liar found out!
You must be desperate to keep reposting this lie!
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell and His Smears |
23 Sep 2006 11:56:35 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12hc18bsvnq2m7c@corp.supernews.com...
"I haven't told a gross lie in a WHOLE HOUR!
I MUST GET ON LINE AND LIE!". Pant! Pant!
Thanks for the confession, but this isn't Dial-A-Priest
.
|
|
|
| User: "WCB" |
|
| Title: Gandy the biggest liar on the net |
24 Sep 2006 04:31:24 AM |
|
|
Gandalf Grey wrote:
"I haven't told a gross lie in a WHOLE HOUR!
I MUST GET ON LINE AND LIE!". Pant! Pant!
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
The people criticizing were open critics of process philosophy.
You lied, Barwell. When are you going to admit it?
Why are you lying here when people can easily check
up on your bizarre and hate filled lies?
http://www.religion-online.org/
Process Studies Journal
Al this is from process theologysown journals!
Do you think people are so stupid they can't figure
this out if I post the URLs? Do you think nobody will
bother to check up and see what a brazen, pathological,
chronic liar you are?
123
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics by David Ray Griffin
Even Charles Hartshorne, the preeminent interpreter of process thinking,
admitted that he could not reconcile his doctrine of god with relativity
physics. The author discusses the dichotomy between the two ideas and
offers some solutions.
Griffin is a long time process theology proponent.
Why do you lie a lie so easily debunked?
because you just do not care if you are a liar found out!
You must be desperate to keep reposting this lie!
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell the biggest liar on the net |
24 Sep 2006 01:10:46 PM |
|
|
"WCB" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12hck4faqv74m86@corp.supernews.com...
"I haven't told a gross lie in a WHOLE HOUR!
I MUST GET ON LINE AND LIE!". Pant! Pant!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell and His Smears |
23 Sep 2006 09:55:19 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12ggo27ep3ohf80@corp.supernews.com...
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
And Barwell selectively edited a single article that WAS IN FACT A DEFENSE
OF PROCESS THEOLOGY.
What's interesting about Barwell's attack is that it is precisely the same
kind of attack that we expect from the Creationist Fundamentalists. He
noticed an internal debate within the process philosophy community and is
now pretending that the PT community has "admitted" that PT doesn't work.
All of that is precisely like saying that scientists have admitted that
Darwinian Evolution is false because Stephen Gould proposed the theory of
punctuated equilibrium.
Barwell has now emerged as, not only a vicious liar, but a man willing to
adopt the techniques and political rhetoric of the religious right in an
effort to silence his critics.
I've appended the conclusions of the article that Barwell attempted to
misrepresent so that the group can see the extent to which Barwell is
willing to go to spread his lies.
Anyone wishing to read the entire article can go to.
http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=2829
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics
by David Ray Griffin
[excerpt]
Summary
The idea that the special theory of relativity creates problems for
temporalistic theisms, such as that of Whitehead and especially Hartshorne
arises from a combination of a fact and an assumption. The fact is that this
theory does not provide the basis for a cosmic "now." The assumption is that
this theory has ontological implications for the truth about time. Combining
the fact and the assumption creates the idea that special relativity physics
rules out the possibility of a cosmic "now." And that idea, if true, would
seem to rule out the possible truth of temporalistic theisms in which God
and the world interact.
But we need not assume that special relativity physics has ontological
implications for the nature of time. One way to relativize its status is to
postulate a form of efficient causation that influences distant events
instantaneously. In Whiteheadian terms, the principle that contemporaries do
not interact causally is still affirmed, because the instantaneous influence
is exerted only after an occasion achieves satisfaction. This proposal,
which I prefer, is aligned with some positions currently proposed by
physicists, in which a cosmic "now" based on instantaneous effects is
affirmed. A second way to reconcile temporalistic theism and relativity
physics is simply to see the latter as having no ontological implications
about time whatsoever, so that the possibility of a cosmic "now" is left
open, then postulating that a cosmic "now" does exist for God by virtue of
God's all-inclusive standpoint. This second proposal is in harmony with
suggestions by temporalistic theists beyond the process camp.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Gandys furious ad hominem attack |
22 Sep 2006 04:15:25 PM |
|
|
Gandy STILL lies and lies and lies!
---------
Gandy's claim.
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
There is not a single well known leading scientist that
can be quoted with a specific quote that says that at all.
Show us a quote from any really famous physicists that
say that; "Whitehead's philosophy is now acclaimed as the
philosophy behind modern science."
Or admit you are wrong and had no idea what you were babbling
about when you posted you foolish and false claim!
SPECIFIC QUOTES! FROM WELL KNOWN WORKING SCIENTISTS!
Put them here.
---------------->
I will post this challenge ever day until you comply, to show you are
a lying, stupid *****. Or until you admit you shot your intellectually
incompetent mouth off with having any reason to have made your foolish
claim and admit this was a gross error on your part.
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Gandys furious ad hominem attack |
22 Sep 2006 04:22:16 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12h8kkhe8jjhtf7@corp.supernews.com...
Gandy STILL lies and lies and lies!
The header coupled with the text really paints a beautiful picture of irony
at its best.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Gandys furious ad hominem attack |
22 Sep 2006 11:46:14 PM |
|
|
Gandalf Grey wrote:
September 11 - Gandy Grey:
As opposed to someone like you who never worked anything out, Whitehead's
philosophy is now acclaimed as the philosophy behind modern science.
Gandalf Grey wrote:
Barwell dug up the work of people who are openly critical of process
theology and exactly one process theologian who mentioned a doubt. The
subject is essentially an open debate on only one aspect of process
theology.
Barwell went to articles that had been printed in Process
Theology's own journals, not hostile outsiders
The people criticizing were open critics of process philosophy.
You lied, Barwell. When are you going to admit it?
Why are you lying here when people can easily check
up on your bizarre and hate filled lies?
http://www.religion-online.org/
Process Studies Journal
Al this is from process theologysown journals!
Do you think people are so stupid they can't figure
this out if I post the URLs? Do you think nobody will
bother to check up and see what a brazen, pathological,
chronic liar you are?
123
Hartshorne, God, and Relativity Physics by David Ray Griffin
Even Charles Hartshorne, the preeminent interpreter of process thinking,
admitted that he could not reconcile his doctrine of god with relativity
physics. The author discusses the dichotomy between the two ideas and
offers some solutions.
Griffin is a long time process theology proponent.
Why do you lie a lie so easily debunked?
because you just do not care if you are a liar found out!
You must be desperate to keep reposting this lie!
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious Fatheadedness |
23 Sep 2006 12:25:38 AM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12gm85o4g83vi69@corp.supernews.com...
Matt Silberstein wrote:
And some opposed it. Figure out where you want those goalposts.
Some religious people oppoesed it,
Another example of Barwell backpedaling from his lies.
You, sir, are a flaming, barefaced Liar.
Proof follows
This should be the end of the question of Barlow's credibility.
Path:
g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: wbarwell <wbarw...@mylinuxisp.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: The Problem of Evil
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 03:01:20 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID:
Snip to relevant passages. [CAPs for emphasis are mine....GG]
***********************************************************
The Failure of Christianity in America
W. C . Barwell 3-8-05
***********************************************************
NO Christians respected life here. Or freedom. But supported
Nixon heartily despite the horrors we committed in Vietnam
and Cambodia and Chile and winked at support for others
mentioned above.
NO CHRISTIAN LEADERS of either far right or mainstream
cared nor brought Bush and the GOP leadership of House
and Senate to task for this genocide of innocents.
NOT ONCE did religious christian Americans, EITHER
LEADERSHIP or rank and file ever find any of these
evils unacceptable or punish any who supported any
of this. Not the christian right NOR LEADERS of
major US religious denominations.
Most GOP House and Senate members were people who
did these things claimed to be christians. NOT A ONE
CARES, NOT A CHRISTIAN CARES they did not care or act.
Many of those who presided over these massive moral
failures still hold office in the US Congress and
Senate, leaders and ran and file. Almost all claim
to be christians.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious Fatheadedness |
23 Sep 2006 04:36:29 PM |
|
|
Gandalf Grey wrote:
sed it. Figure out where you want those goalposts.
Some religious people oppoesed it,
Another example of Barwell backpedaling from his lies.
No, the issue is, did main stream religions with 100+ million people do
theuir duty and end decages of support for Genocide.
They did not do so and made little sustained,competent effort to do so.
It is not about the small minority that tried and failed to get their
bretheren to pull their thumbs out. Nomatter how you twist and writhe, we
had 35 years of rank failure with no excuse for failure except moral
cowardice.
The Catonsville Nine
In 1968, after his release on bail, Berrigan decided to repeat the protest
in a somewhat modified form. A local high-school physics teacher helped to
concoct homemade napalm. Nine activists, who later became known as the
Catonsville Nine, walked into the draft board of Catonsville, Maryland,
and burned 378 draft files. The Catonsville Nine, who were all Catholic,
issued a statement:
"We confront the Catholic Church, other Christian bodies, and the
synagogues of America with their silence and cowardice in the face of our
country's crimes. We are convinced that the religious bureaucracy in this
country is racist, is an accomplice in this war, and is hostile to the
poor."
Berrigan was again arrested and was sentenced to three and a half years in
prison.
Whose word do I take Berrigan,
who shouted out about the failure of religion in America, or a lying
scumbag like you?
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious Fatheadedness |
23 Sep 2006 04:45:37 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12hba8ebh9u6sf5@corp.supernews.com...
Gandalf Grey wrote:
sed it. Figure out where you want those goalposts.
Some religious people oppoesed it,
Another example of Barwell backpedaling from his lies.
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12gf51pcjn3h361@corp.supernews.com...
On the peace movement during the vietnam war....
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12f6pbesv6ltr97@corp.supernews.com...
Basically, it was not the churches that did anything,
You're a liar as history shows.
http://encyclopedia.com/html/p/pacifism.asp
Motivations
One of the strongest motivations in the promotion of peace has been
religion, the objection to war being, in general, based on the belief that
the willful taking of human life is wrong. The Eastern religions, especially
Buddhism, decry war and advocate nonresistance. There has also been a strong
pacifistic element in Judaism and Christianity. The Sermon on the Mount, in
particular, contains a strong exhortation to peace. The church generally
voiced opposition to war as such (with the notable exception of the
Crusades); in the Middle Ages the truce of God was the outcome of
ecclesiastical attempts to halt private warfare. Some later sects-especially
the Anabaptists, Quakers, Moravians, Dukhobors, and Mennonites-have elevated
nonresistance to a doctrinal position.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Papers Project: Encyclopedia King formally
announced his opposition to the Vietnam War during the Ninth ... Addressing
a crowd of 3000 people in Riverside Church in New York City, ...
www.stanford.edu/group/King/about_king/encyclopedia/vietnam.htm - 8k -
Cached - Similar pages
1965-1973: GI opposition the Vietnam War - Howard Zinn | libcom.org
Historian Howard Zinn on the opposition to the Vietnam War by American
soldiers. ... the military authorities by taking "sanctuary" in churches,
where, ...
libcom.org/library/soldiers-opposition-to-vietnam-war-zinn - 24k -
Cached - Similar pages
Left and Vietnam War Accommodating to church and liberal opposition to the
War amongst students and academics, commentary on foreign policy and Vietnam
from late 1965 gave ...
www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/interventions/leftvietnam.htm - 88k -
Cached - Similar pages
Conscientious Objection: Information From Answers.com Members of peace
churches who refused to fight or help build fortifications ... During the
Vietnam War, Selective Service denied exemption to conscientious ...
www.answers.com/topic/conscientious-objection - 43k - Cached - Similar
pages
[ More results from www.answers.com ]
H-Net Editors Directory - Mitchell K. Hall "CALCAV and Religious Opposition
to the Vietnam War," in Melvin Small and ... "A Withdrawal from Peace: The
Historical Response to War of the Church of God ...
www.h-net.org/people/editors/show.cgi?ID=124514 - 10k - Cached -
Similar pages
Legendary liberal WW Finlator fought segregation, poverty, war Finlator,
longtime pastor of Pullen Memorial Baptist Church in Raleigh, ... including
opposition to the Vietnam War, support for women's rights, ...
www.abpnews.com/1307.article - 11k - Cached - Similar pages
Dorothy Day, Peter Maurin and the Catholic Worker Movement ... Dorothy Day,
Prophet of Pacifism for the Catholic Church ... The influence of the
Catholic Worker during the Vietnam War is explored in detail in American ...
www.cjd.org/paper/pacifism.html - 26k - Cached - Similar pages
Roman Catholic Mary Moylan (Vietnam War resister) a nurse who in 1968
participated in the ... and corporate actions that awakened Catholic
opposition to the Vietnam War. ...
www.soulforce.org/article/95 - 19k - Cached - Similar pages
United Church of Christ News - John Thomas: 'A United Church
That ...
In the twentieth century our church gave formal support to
conscientious objectors, not just during the Vietnam conflict, but during
the Second World War as ...
news.ucc.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=580&Itemid=56
- 42k - Cached - Similar pages
TIME.com: Speaking Out on Foreign Policy -- Jul 30, 1965 -- Page
1 Recently, a "Clergymen's Emergency Committee for Vietnam," representing
3000 ... A radical minority would commit the churches to total opposition to
war. ...
www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,834069,00.html -
Similar pages
HOLY OBEDIENCE: Corporate Discipline and Individual Leading
Friends were increasingly willing as the Vietnam War progressed to join with
a wide variety of church, pacifist and other antiwar groups in attempting to
....
www.hwcn.org/link/hmm/nl/archive/d1.htm - 27k - Cached -
Similar pages
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious dislike of Christianity's failures. |
23 Sep 2006 07:19:28 PM |
|
|
The Catonsville Nine
In 1968, after his release on bail, Berrigan decided to repeat the protest
in a somewhat modified form. A local high-school physics teacher helped to
concoct homemade napalm. Nine activists, who later became known as the
Catonsville Nine, walked into the draft board of Catonsville, Maryland,
and burned 378 draft files. The Catonsville Nine, who were all Catholic,
issued a statement:
"We confront the Catholic Church, other Christian bodies, and the
synagogues of America with their silence and cowardice in the face of our
country's crimes. We are convinced that the religious bureaucracy in this
country is racist, is an accomplice in this war, and is hostile to the
poor."
Berrigan was again arrested and was sentenced to three and a half years in
prison.
Nixon
War in Vietnam.
Phoenix program
Secret and illegal bombing in Cambodia
Overthrow of Allende, support of
Pinochets murderous, torturing regime.
Support for Greek Junta.
Support for Brazilian Junta.
Support for Argentine Junta
Support for indonesian invasions
of Papua - New Guinea
Support for Indonesian invasion
of East Timur.
Where were the churches?
Despite this and more, Nixon won re-election
with 60% of the vote, Christians mostly.
953-1996: Guatemala
"We have created a more humanitarian, less costly strategy, to be more
compatible with the democratic system. We instituted civil affairs [in
1982] which provides development for 70 percent of the population, while
we kill 30 percent. Before, the strategy was to kill 100 percent."
--General Héctor Gramajo, 1980s Guatemalan Minister of Defense, interview
with Harvard International Review, cited here
Reagan's buddies.
--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here,
and whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: Barwell's furious Hypocrisy and Lies |
23 Sep 2006 09:36:09 PM |
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:12ecl42irp8em32@corp.supernews.com...
***********************************************************
The Failure of Christianity in America
W. C . Barwell 3-8-05
***********************************************************
No major religious denominations nor their leaders
spoke out and drew a line at any of this.
That's a lie. Another one of your lies that I've demonstrated repeatedly by
specific citations from the World Council of Churches and specific mainline
denominations.
RONALD REAGAN 1981 - 1989
Ronald Reagan came to power largely because of the
religious right's politicization and support.
Reagan and the GOP supported the mass murdering ex-Somoza
Guards of Nicaragua.
And some of those GOPs are atheists.
The {Christian} and religious right heavily supported Reagan
and the GOP despite numerous examples of such evils as
listed above.
Not all of them. Another lie.
The leaders of the religious right never cared
nor complained,
neither did the religious leaders of the
main stream christian denominations make any effort
to stand up and denounce these outrageous policies.
Another lie.
The members of major denominations made no effort to
complain and demand their religious leaders react to
support for genocidal mass murderers.
Another lie.
There was and is no respect for life in organized American
christianity as these wholesale and repeat failures of
America christianity collectively over 20 years shows.
Another lie.
Many churches
Note the easy way Barwell slides from "Many" to "all" or "none" or "not
one."
GEORGE W. BUSH
Bush continued support for the evil dictators above,
including Pinochet, Pol Pot and others. However,
Saddam screwed us and invaded Kuwait, mainly because
Bush screwed up and did not warn him to not do so
as Hussein repeatedly threatened to invade Kuwait
for nearly two months and coolly noted Bush's lack
of much response.
Bush did not act in case of genocide by Yugoslavia's
Milosevic, and Bush and the GOP's loud and obnoxious
foot-dragging here allowed Milosevic to kill
hundreds of thousands with near impunity.
The leaders of the GOP, House and Senate, and religious
leaders of the right
and mainstream denominations never
cared about any of this. never made an issue out of it.
Another outright demonstrable lie.
No Christian leaders of either far right or mainstream
denominations cared, nor brought Bush and the GOP leadership
of House and Senate to task for this genocide of innocents.
Another lie.
The voters' guides pushed in many churches still were demanding
parishioners vote GOP despite these horrors and mass murders.
No leaders of large, powerful and influential denominations
ever stood up and denounced these mass murders.
Another lie.
Christians
underneath did not push dilatory and unresponsive denominational
leaders to speak out, act and lead against these mass murders
and war crimes.
Another lie.
Clinton:
Under Clinton this Iraq policy continued. Again, Christians
did not care.
Another lie.
All many Christians cared about
Again, the smooth and oily shift from "all" to "many"
was Clinton's
don't-ask-don't-tell gays in military policy and Clinton's
sex life and Whitewater. $47 million spent investigating
Whitewater while the Christian right roared with naked hate.
Money spent investigation mass murder in Iraq caused by
our purposeful by our sanctions? $0.
Roars of disprovable from Christian America over these mass
murders? None.
No large denominations ever made these war crimes and mass murders
an issue nor took the GOP or president to task over these horrors.
Another lie.
What has 30 years of right winged GOP government and right
winger christianity got us? Mass murder, genocide,
Nothing but callousness, disregard for human life,
support for dictators, a near total moral failure of
religion, Christianity, GOP and the American right.
And American atheists as well as ALL Americans. Since all one needs to do
is turn to the World Council of Churches alone to see scores of times when
the "major denominations have stood up against U.S. warmongering and
genocide.
Not once did the large mass of religious christian
Americans, either leadership or rank and file ever
find any of these evils unacceptable or punish any
who supported any of this. Not the christian right
nor leaders of major US religious denominations.
An outright, blatant lie.
Most GOP House and Senate members were people who
did these things claimed to be christians.
WHAT? Not ALL??????
Not one
cares, not many christian denominations care that
they did not care or act. Many of those who presided
over these massive moral failures still hold office
in the US Congress and Senate, leaders and ran and file.
Almost all claim to be christians.
But not all.
They retain full support of far right religious
leaders, pundits and rank and file christian
followers.
of the right wing. There are many liberal denominations and many liberal
Christians. You're a blatant liar, Barwell.
30 years of failure. 30 years of support for
far right genocidal bastards, mass murderers,
and evil by the Leaders of Religious right
and large denominations.
Another lie. Many of the largest denominations have stood up against the
wall, why sniveling anti-theists like you are pounding on the keys to paste
your next Usenet screed read by all of half a dozen human beings.
Christians posture as moral
So do atheists like you.
, American christians have
a very bad track records when it comes to morality
So do atheists like you if your penchant for libel and lying are any
example.
Christianity thus can only be called a moral failure,
So can you, Barwell.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|