GAO Report on Presidential Signing Statements
June 18th, 2007 by Jesse Lee
From the Judiciary Committee:

GAO Report Shows Power Grab in Presidential Signing Statements

(Washington, DC)- Today, the nonpartisan General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report which found that in a limited number of Presidential
signing statements examined, the Bush Administration failed to execute the
law as instructed in over 30 percent of the cases. House Judiciary Committee
Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) and Senate Appropriations Chairman Robert
C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) requested the report.

GAO researchers found signing statements in 11 of 12 appropriations acts
in fiscal year 2006 and examined a sample of 19 provisions with which the
President expressed concern in his signing statements. The President
objected to, and federal agencies failed to execute, public law in six of
those cases - 30 percent of the total sample.

"The Administration is thumbing its nose at the law," Conyers said. "This
study calls for an extensive review of these practices, something the
Administration has so far refused to do."

"The White House cannot pick and choose which laws it follows and which it
ignores. When a president signs a bill into law, the president signs the
entire bill. The Administration cannot be in the business of cherry picking
the laws it likes and the laws it doesn't," Senator Byrd said. "This GAO
opinion underscores the fact that the Bush White House is constantly
grabbing for more power, seeking to drive the people's branch of government
to the sidelines. Too often, the Bush Administration does what it wants, no
matter the law. It says what it wants, no matter the facts. We must continue
to demand accountability and openness from this White House to counter this
power grab."

The new GAO opinion underscores an April finding by the nonpartisan
Congressional Research Service (CRS). The April report found that President
George W. Bush has raised objections in his signing statements far more than
any of his predecessors. In fact, President Bush issued 149 signing
statements, 127 (85 percent) of which raised some objection. The significant
rise in the proportion of constitutional objections made by the President
Bush is compounded by the fact that these statements are typified by
multiple objections, resulting in over 700 challenges to distinct provisions
of law.

In comparison, CRS found that President Reagan issued 276 signing
statements, 71 of which (26%) contained provisions questioning the
constitutionality of one or more of the statutory provisions signed into
law. President Clinton issued 391 statements, 105 of which (27%) raised
constitutional concerns or objections.

Some of the most troubling instances that the GAO examined include:

- The Defense Department did not include separate budget justifications
documents explaining how Iraq war funding was to be spent in its 2007 budget
request, as required by public law;

- The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) did not submit a proposal
and expenditure plan for housing, as directed by Congress;

- Customs and Border patrol did not relocate its checkpoints in the Tuscon
area every seven days, as directed by Congress.

GAO researchers also studied how federal courts view Presidential signing
statements. They found that courts rarely rely on them as authoritative
interpretations of the law.

- Customs and Border patrol did not relocate its checkpoints in the Tuscon
area every seven days, as directed by Congress.