| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
23 May 2006 11:11:36 AM |
| Object: |
Gay foster parents abused young boys |
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one of
the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in jail
after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and two
boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the older
boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Donald E. Flood" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 11:22:45 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Y5udneTC4sK7qe7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one
of
the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in
jail
after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and
two
boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the
older
boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
The biggest class of sexual abusers are white, Protestant ministers. Your
point?
--
Come visit us at the IIDB:
http://iidb.org/vbb/index.php
The BEST Atheist website!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 12:49:15 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 23 May 2006 16:22:45 GMT, "Donald E. Flood"
<Jehanne@mchsi.com> wrote in message
<pFGcg.161507$oL.112204@attbi_s71>
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Y5udneTC4sK7qe7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
[piggybacking] You mean this anecdote makes it's OK for RCC priests
to molest children? What planet are you from? How does your "mind"
work?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
[anecdote snipped]
The biggest class of sexual abusers are white, Protestant ministers. Your
point?
It's J.Young. There *is* no point.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 01:09:20 PM |
|
|
"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:lei672tbi4ro11k36egp7t6i530n5n8r82@4ax.com...
On Tue, 23 May 2006 16:22:45 GMT, "Donald E. Flood"
<Jehanne@mchsi.com> wrote in message
<pFGcg.161507$oL.112204@attbi_s71>
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Y5udneTC4sK7qe7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
[piggybacking] You mean this anecdote makes it's OK for RCC priests
to molest children? What planet are you from? How does your "mind"
work?
I don't think it does, that's the problem
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 02:49:34 PM |
|
|
"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:lei672tbi4ro11k36egp7t6i530n5n8r82@4ax.com...
On Tue, 23 May 2006 16:22:45 GMT, "Donald E. Flood"
<Jehanne@mchsi.com> wrote in message
<pFGcg.161507$oL.112204@attbi_s71>
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Y5udneTC4sK7qe7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
[piggybacking] You mean this anecdote makes it's OK for RCC priests
to molest children? What planet are you from? How does your "mind"
work?
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that they
declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to argue,
though, that the RCC is not responsible (at least in it's administration)
for letting queers slip into the priesthood.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Bohlman" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 12:39:59 AM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in
news:WDJcg.55901$iB2.26528@bignews4.bellsouth.net:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that
they declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to
The RCC, like any organization, is most certainly both legally and morally
responsible for the acts of individuals who abuse the positions of
authority that it grants them. Thus, while the RCC has no responsibility
for the acts of ordinary parishioners, it is responsible for the acts of
its priests, especially when they use their authority as priests to gain
access to victims.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude_Alexander Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 10:08:32 AM |
|
|
"Eric Bohlman" <ebohlman@omsdev.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97CD6A2A1817ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in
news:WDJcg.55901$iB2.26528@bignews4.bellsouth.net:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that
they declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to
The RCC, like any organization, is most certainly both legally and morally
responsible for the acts of individuals who abuse the positions of
authority that it grants them.
Not necessarily. If I work for a company and shoot somebody, is the company
I work for liable? The reason the RCC was made responsibile for some of the
pedophic priest in it's ranks is that they KNEW that the man suffered from
this malady and tried to help him but the priest continued in his defiling
of young girls or boys and they DID NOTHING. Of course, some of the
response of the RCC was truly out of ignorance, which they no longer have a
claim to.
Thus, while the RCC has no responsibility
for the acts of ordinary parishioners, it is responsible for the acts of
its priests, especially when they use their authority as priests to gain
access to victims.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 10:38:34 AM |
|
|
"Jude_Alexander" <Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la> wrote in message
news:nF_cg.25685$qd2.8043@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Eric Bohlman" <ebohlman@omsdev.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97CD6A2A1817ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in
news:WDJcg.55901$iB2.26528@bignews4.bellsouth.net:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that
they declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to
The RCC, like any organization, is most certainly both legally and
morally
responsible for the acts of individuals who abuse the positions of
authority that it grants them.
Not necessarily. If I work for a company and shoot somebody, is the
company I work for liable?
They will be asked if they did background checks, any employee complaints
about him, etc. What did you do when you found out, blah blah blah.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude_Alexander Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 01:55:12 PM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:E2%cg.56393$iB2.8107@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Jude_Alexander" <Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la> wrote in message
news:nF_cg.25685$qd2.8043@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Eric Bohlman" <ebohlman@omsdev.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97CD6A2A1817ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in
news:WDJcg.55901$iB2.26528@bignews4.bellsouth.net:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that
they declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to
The RCC, like any organization, is most certainly both legally and
morally
responsible for the acts of individuals who abuse the positions of
authority that it grants them.
Not necessarily. If I work for a company and shoot somebody, is the
company I work for liable?
They will be asked if they did background checks, any employee complaints
about him, etc. What did you do when you found out, blah blah blah.
BAM
Not all companies are required by law to do background checks on their
empoloyees. The only way a company would be held accounted (or you would
hope so) would be if they KNEW beforehand of a potential danger from an
employee and did nothing about it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 11:41:58 AM |
|
|
"Jude_Alexander" <Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la> wrote in message
news:nF_cg.25685$qd2.8043@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Eric Bohlman" <ebohlman@omsdev.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97CD6A2A1817ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in
news:WDJcg.55901$iB2.26528@bignews4.bellsouth.net:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that
they declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to
The RCC, like any organization, is most certainly both legally and
morally
responsible for the acts of individuals who abuse the positions of
authority that it grants them.
Not necessarily. If I work for a company and shoot somebody, is the
company I work for liable? The reason the RCC was made responsibile for
some of the pedophic priest in it's ranks is that they KNEW that the man
suffered from this malady and tried to help him but the priest continued
in his defiling of young girls or boys and they DID NOTHING. Of course,
some of the response of the RCC was truly out of ignorance, which they no
longer have a claim to.
Thus, while the RCC has no responsibility
for the acts of ordinary parishioners, it is responsible for the acts of
its priests, especially when they use their authority as priests to gain
access to victims.
You'd expect your employer to fire you on the spot though.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude_Alexander Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 02:00:02 PM |
|
|
"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:-OCdnaQidsNKEenZnZ2dnUVZ8qadnZ2d@bt.com...
"Jude_Alexander" <Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la> wrote in message
news:nF_cg.25685$qd2.8043@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Eric Bohlman" <ebohlman@omsdev.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97CD6A2A1817ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in
news:WDJcg.55901$iB2.26528@bignews4.bellsouth.net:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that
they declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to
The RCC, like any organization, is most certainly both legally and
morally
responsible for the acts of individuals who abuse the positions of
authority that it grants them.
Not necessarily. If I work for a company and shoot somebody, is the
company I work for liable? The reason the RCC was made responsibile for
some of the pedophic priest in it's ranks is that they KNEW that the man
suffered from this malady and tried to help him but the priest continued
in his defiling of young girls or boys and they DID NOTHING. Of course,
some of the response of the RCC was truly out of ignorance, which they no
longer have a claim to.
Thus, while the RCC has no responsibility
for the acts of ordinary parishioners, it is responsible for the acts of
its priests, especially when they use their authority as priests to gain
access to victims.
You'd expect your employer to fire you on the spot though.
I would HOPE that any employee or dependent (as in the case of RCC) that
showed signs of serious mental problems, that they would rush to help this
individual and/or alert some authorities. Most companies are not going to
take a hand in helping a wayward employee, however, it is understandable
that the RCC tried to help some of their priests in the past when they were
unaware of what pedophilia truly was and that pedophiles need to be in
therapy for their lives much like an acoholic.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 10:37:07 AM |
|
|
"Eric Bohlman" <ebohlman@omsdev.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97CD6A2A1817ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in
news:WDJcg.55901$iB2.26528@bignews4.bellsouth.net:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that
they declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to
The RCC, like any organization, is most certainly both legally and morally
responsible for the acts of individuals who abuse the positions of
authority that it grants them. Thus, while the RCC has no responsibility
for the acts of ordinary parishioners, it is responsible for the acts of
its priests, especially when they use their authority as priests to gain
access to victims.
You are referring to the Latin : "respondeat superior", which is a form of
strict liability, and not necessarily valid. The king can't know everything
about all his subjects.
BAM
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dcc" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 03:48:45 AM |
|
|
heres a site of j youngs fav rev
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rev._Fred_Phelps and heres a site im sure
j y also helps support with donations!!!!!!!!
www.godhatesfags.com/main/index.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 12:10:12 AM |
|
|
bam wrote:
"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:lei672tbi4ro11k36egp7t6i530n5n8r82@4ax.com...
On Tue, 23 May 2006 16:22:45 GMT, "Donald E. Flood"
<Jehanne@mchsi.com> wrote in message
<pFGcg.161507$oL.112204@attbi_s71>
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Y5udneTC4sK7qe7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
[piggybacking] You mean this anecdote makes it's OK for RCC priests
to molest children? What planet are you from? How does your "mind"
work?
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that they
declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to argue,
though, that the RCC is not responsible (at least in it's administration)
for letting queers slip into the priesthood.
BAM
The RCC is not responsible - period
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude_Alexander Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 10:05:40 AM |
|
|
"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:4473EA34.42B83801@netvigator.com...
bam wrote:
"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:lei672tbi4ro11k36egp7t6i530n5n8r82@4ax.com...
On Tue, 23 May 2006 16:22:45 GMT, "Donald E. Flood"
<Jehanne@mchsi.com> wrote in message
<pFGcg.161507$oL.112204@attbi_s71>
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Y5udneTC4sK7qe7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
[piggybacking] You mean this anecdote makes it's OK for RCC priests
to molest children? What planet are you from? How does your "mind"
work?
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals; acts which that they
declare unreservedly to be mortal sins. It would be tougher to argue,
though, that the RCC is not responsible (at least in it's administration)
for letting queers slip into the priesthood.
BAM
The RCC is not responsible - period
I agree with you but onl partially. The RCC should not be held accountable
of any individual pedophile within their midst IF they had not prior
knowledge of wrong doing. Also, there is the "gray area" that IF they knew
prior that a priest had defiled a youngster and send the priest to therapy
and didn't know that therapy doens't always help these guys, then they
shouldn't be held accountable. HOWEVER, if the defiling continues and
continues and ALL the RCC does in response is keep moving the priest around
(which has been documented in the past) then RCC SHOULD be held accountable.
How accountable is debatable. That's what courts are for.
Now, that everything is out in the open, the RCC should be COMPLETELY held
accountable if they maintain a pedophile within their midst. It SHOULD be
grounds for immediate dismissal at least after an attempt of counseling has
failed to produce a priest that is willing to stay in counseling for life
like a 12 step program.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 07:56:38 PM |
|
|
bam wrote:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals
They're not their Brothers' keepers? Who knew?
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 10:34:34 AM |
|
|
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:abOcg.46294$P2.14602@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
bam wrote:
The RCC is not responsible for acts of individuals
They're not their Brothers' keepers? Who knew?
What a brainless response. I hope you don't shoot your mouth off like this
in public.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 07:14:39 PM |
|
|
bam wrote:
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote:
They're not their Brothers' keepers? Who knew?
What a brainless response. I hope you don't shoot your mouth off like this
in public.
Now, now... Would you prefer I shoot something else off? ;-)
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 12:09:10 AM |
|
|
Boy Toy wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006 16:22:45 GMT, "Donald E. Flood"
<Jehanne@mchsi.com> wrote in message
<pFGcg.161507$oL.112204@attbi_s71>
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Y5udneTC4sK7qe7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
[piggybacking] You mean this anecdote makes it's OK for RCC priests
to molest children? What planet are you from? How does your "mind"
work?
For a person that has been brainwashed from childhood
that is perhaps not a fair question
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
[anecdote snipped]
The biggest class of sexual abusers are white, Protestant ministers. Your
point?
It's J.Young. There *is* no point.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Betcha" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 07:37:37 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one of
the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in jail
after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and two
boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the older
boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
Well, that disproves the 'gay men don't abuse children' BS that we're
supposed to believe. Great. Now straight people AND gay people abuse
children. Now what? Other than the inevitable hail of ad hominem tu
quoque comments, I wonder if anyone will have any decent suggestions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 07:40:44 PM |
|
|
In News 1148431057.850012.189610@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,, Hugh Betcha
at gemond@canada.com, typed this:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted
by one of the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms
in jail after being convicted of molesting and filming
eight-year-old twins and two boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of
the older boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
Well, that disproves the 'gay men don't abuse children'
Who said that?
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 09:08:02 PM |
|
|
On 23 May 2006 17:37:37 -0700, "Hugh Betcha" <gemond@canada.com>
wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one of
the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in jail
after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and two
boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the older
boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
Well, that disproves the 'gay men don't abuse children' BS that we're
supposed to believe. Great. Now straight people AND gay people abuse
children. Now what? Other than the inevitable hail of ad hominem tu
quoque comments, I wonder if anyone will have any decent suggestions.
The point was gay men are not automatically child abusers, nor are
child abusers even if they abuse the same sex, gay. Did you think
that saying that supposedly meant that no gay person ever abused a
child?
But I'm afraid you can't trust anything that J.Young posts. He's well
aware his sources are known for lying and admits it, but doesn't care.
Now what - you pay your taxes and get off your butt to be sure they
are well used to properly run foster programs and not just put in the
politician's pocket to contract out the program to the lowest bidder.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 07:55:30 PM |
|
|
On 23 May 2006 17:37:37 -0700, "Hugh Betcha" <gemond@canada.com> wrote
in message <1148431057.850012.189610@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one of
the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in jail
after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and two
boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the older
boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
Well, that disproves the 'gay men don't abuse children' BS that we're
supposed to believe. Great. Now straight people AND gay people abuse
children. Now what? Other than the inevitable hail of ad hominem tu
quoque comments, I wonder if anyone will have any decent suggestions.
Nobody said that.
What was said is that, notwithstanding individual anecdotes, gay men
are no more likely to abuse children than straights.
It's the fundie homophobes who constantly and falsely claim that gays
are more likely to be pedos than straights.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Betcha" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
23 May 2006 08:59:46 PM |
|
|
Boy Toy wrote:
On 23 May 2006 17:37:37 -0700, "Hugh Betcha" <gemond@canada.com> wrote
in message <1148431057.850012.189610@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one of
the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in jail
after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and two
boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the older
boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
Well, that disproves the 'gay men don't abuse children' BS that we're
supposed to believe. Great. Now straight people AND gay people abuse
children. Now what? Other than the inevitable hail of ad hominem tu
quoque comments, I wonder if anyone will have any decent suggestions.
Nobody said that.
What was said is that, notwithstanding individual anecdotes, gay men
are no more likely to abuse children than straights.
You're right. I've personally had several debates/discussions with
folks who believe that gay men simply DON'T abuse children; I didn't
mean to imply that it's a commonly held view.
It's the fundie homophobes who constantly and falsely claim that gays
are more likely to be pedos than straights.
There's 'fundies' on both sides of the issue.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 08:50:33 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one of
the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in jail
after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and two
boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the older
boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
Typical ***** behavior.
And the reason they shouldn't work around or adopt children
--
----------
J Young
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 11:10:54 AM |
|
|
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole100@hotmail.com> wrote in message
snip
Typical ***** behavior.
And the reason they shouldn't work around or adopt children
What about the heterosexual adoptive parents that abuse and/or murder their
adoptive children?
Typical hetero behavior?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
27 May 2006 09:09:02 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole100@hotmail.com> wrote in message
snip
Typical ***** behavior.
And the reason they shouldn't work around or adopt children
What about the heterosexual adoptive parents that abuse and/or murder their
adoptive children?
Typical hetero behavior?
Agreed.....and an overworked phrase [but it works well here]
'holier than thou"
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
26 May 2006 12:14:44 PM |
|
|
this is a scary story...all I know is child harrassment, no matter how,
when or where it happens is awful...I just hope people report it when
they come across it. The easiest way to alert authorities is to
contact law enforcement or a place like cybertipline!
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
27 May 2006 09:12:03 PM |
|
|
wrote:
this is a scary story...all I know is child harrassment, no matter how,
when or where it happens is awful...I just hope people report it when
they come across it. The easiest way to alert authorities is to
contact law enforcement or a place like cybertipline!
.....and don't say "It's none of my business"
It is your business ........your kids, or a near relative, could be next !
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
30 May 2006 03:49:43 PM |
|
|
well stated bob! with these types of organizations hopefully we can
help protect other children from being victimized...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jude_Alexander Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la" |
|
| Title: Re: Gay foster parents abused young boys |
24 May 2006 10:10:32 AM |
|
|
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole100@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148478632.827963.109940@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Is there anyone who still thinks the RCC is wrong?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/23/ngay23.xml
A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile
homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one
of
the victim's parents.
Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in
jail
after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and
two
boys aged 14.
The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the
older
boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.
Typical ***** behavior.
And the reason they shouldn't work around or adopt children
What a evil biggoted thing to say. This is NOT typical gay behavior. Nor
is it typical straight behavior. However, there are both "gay" and
"straight" pedophiles. If you REALLY knew anything, you would know that
with pedophilia, the typical use of gay and straight don't always apply.
However, in your classic bigoted style, you continue to show your ignorance
and self serving statements.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
