| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
12 Feb 2005 03:09:02 PM |
| Object: |
"Gay" penguins reject female advances |
http://www.dehavilland.co.uk/webhost.asp?wci=default&wcp=EntertainmentStoryPage&ItemID=7786262&ServiceID=8&filterid=345221&searchid=234672&category=1
"The hatched plan to get the penguins to reproduce sparked outrage from
lesbian and gay groups, who feared zookeepers might force the animals
to turn straight."
******************************************
And the homo's wonder why people don't take them very seriously.
.
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: "Gay" penguins reject female advances |
14 Feb 2005 09:25:13 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1108391693.662289.95180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Forgeries and "Loose Cannon" go hand and hand.
YOUR "LC' forgeries, you mean:
From: "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.homosexuality,tx.politics,alt.atheism,soc.culture.jewish,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: "Gay" penguins reject female advances
Date: 14 Feb 2005 06:34:53 -0800
Message-ID: <1108391693.662289.95180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
***NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.204
From:
***NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.204
From: Loose Cannon" <Findingis@aol.com>
***NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.204
From: "loser cannon loses again" <superasswipe@hotmail.com>
***NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.204
From:
***NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.204
LC~ "Jon" sure likes to share his computer with his village.
"I am a very happy person. It's just that I have no patients for stupidity."
From: (IBen Getiner AKA JYoung)
Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
Subject: Re: Ignore my last post.
Date: 10 Mar 2004 00:50:40 -0800
Message-ID: <6ba61564.0403100050.256048bd@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: "Gay" penguins reject female advances |
13 Feb 2005 09:28:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:32:42 GMT, J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> said
in alt.atheism:
On 13 Feb 2005 09:44:09 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said
in alt.atheism:
NO. That's your domain. It clearly states "Loose Cannon". You have
claimed time and again that YOU are the true and only "Loose Cannon".
If all Jon Young posts belong to me, then all "Loose Cannon" posts
belong to you.
And may I add ALL "Susan Cohen" posts belong to the same person as does
ALL "Riain Y.Barton" posts.
So this post is evidently yours.
Wadda maroon.
So come on, Jon. What do you say now?
--
"We should do unto others as we would want them to do unto us. If I were an unborn
fetus I would want others to use force to protect me, therefore using force against
abortionists is *justifiable homocide*."
- "Pro-Life" doctor killer and corpse Paul Hill
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Gay" penguins reject female advances |
13 Feb 2005 12:02:04 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
http://www.dehavilland.co.uk/webhost.asp?wci=default&wcp=EntertainmentStoryPage&ItemID=7786262&ServiceID=8&filterid=345221&searchid=234672&category=1
"The hatched plan to get the penguins to reproduce sparked outrage
from
lesbian and gay groups, who feared zookeepers might force the animals
to turn straight."
******************************************
And the homo's wonder why people don't take them very seriously.
And you wonder why people call you an uneducated troll.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/031225377X/qid=1108273420/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/103-3629721-0170259
Bob Dog
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt" |
|
| Title: Re: "Gay" penguins reject female advances |
12 Feb 2005 05:53:44 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
http://www.dehavilland.co.uk/webhost.asp?wci=default&wcp=EntertainmentStoryPage&ItemID=7786262&ServiceID=8&filterid=345221&searchid=234672&category=1
"The hatched plan to get the penguins to reproduce sparked outrage from
lesbian and gay groups, who feared zookeepers might force the animals
to turn straight."
******************************************
And the homo's wonder why people don't take them very seriously.
When there are no gay things in the animal kingdom, nuts like you claim its
because it isn't normal. When it does occur, nuts like you claim that
homosexuals are no better than animals.
I think the greater issue is the inconsistency of arguments that nuts like
you come up with. How about sitting down at your little "anti-gay league"
and come up with a consistant argument, that doesn't need changing every
five minutes.
Matt
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: "Gay" penguins reject female advances |
13 Feb 2005 07:05:04 AM |
|
|
"Matt" <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:x5IPd.1096$1S4.105913@news.xtra.co.nz...
J Young wrote:
http://www.dehavilland.co.uk/webhost.asp?wci=default&wcp=EntertainmentStoryPage&ItemID=7786262&ServiceID=8&filterid=345221&searchid=234672&category=1
"The hatched plan to get the penguins to reproduce sparked outrage from
lesbian and gay groups, who feared zookeepers might force the animals
to turn straight."
******************************************
And the homo's wonder why people don't take them very seriously.
When there are no gay things in the animal kingdom, nuts like you claim
its
because it isn't normal. When it does occur, nuts like you claim that
homosexuals are no better than animals.
I think the greater issue is the inconsistency of arguments that nuts like
you come up with. How about sitting down at your little "anti-gay league"
and come up with a consistant argument, that doesn't need changing every
five minutes.
Matt
Oh don't be silly, that would require some free thought, thinking outside
his narrow, sick, little perspective on life and embracing diversity.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
