"Gay Rights" Strategies Involve Conscious Deception And Wholesale
Manipulation of Public Opinion
When homosexual author James Spada, in The Spada Report, a survey of
homosexual attitudes and behavior (New American Library, 1979), asked
homosexual subjects "Have you ever had your rights denied you because
you are gay?" -- 72.1% of his respondents answered "No" and an
additional 10% gave no answer or said they "didn't know."
Yet, gay marketing professionals (and activists) Marshall Kirk and
Erastes Pill, recommending political strategies designed to lead to, as
they put it, "The Overhauling of Straight America" (Guide Magazine,
November, 1987), suggest:
"Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers. In any
campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need
of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex action to
assume the role of protector...Straight viewers must be able to
identify with gays as victims. Mr. and Mrs. Public must be given no
extra excuses to say `they are not like us'... Our campaign should not
demand direct support for homosexual practices, but should instead take
anti-discrimination as its theme" (Emphasis the authors').
At the same time, Kirk and Pill recommend:
"Make the victimizers look bad... The public should be shown images of
ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle
America. These images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demonstrating
that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers
drooling with hysterical hatred to a degree that looks both comical and
deranged; menacing pugs, thugs, and convicts speaking coolly about the
`fags' they have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi
concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed."
This attitude shows striking resemblance to, of all things, a Communist
Party directive, quoted in the 1956 Report of the House of
Representatives Committee on Un-American Activities (Volume 1, p. 347):
"Members and front organizations must continually embarrass, discredit
and degrade our critics... When obstructionists become too irritating,
label them as fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic... Constantly associate
those who oppose us with those names that already have a bad smell. The
association will, after enough repetition, become `fact' in the public
mind."
Despite concerted gay advantage opponents' attempts to prevent possible
violence to gays (one traditional values organization even promoted a
"Citizens' Boycott" of a gay pride parade in a Colorado city where gays
feared violence -- so gays marched down virtually empty streets), and a
total absence of "gay-bashing" during controversial hearings on the gay
advantage issue, gay activists continue to brand all their opposition
as "hate mongers," "KKKers," "neo-Nazis" and "bigots."
Perhaps the supreme irony underlying this name-calling by gay
extremists was revealed in a recent Washington Blade (D.C.'s gay
tabloid) "First Person" article (January 31, 1991), in which ACT
UP/D.C. founder Eric M. Pollard made the following startling
admissions:
"I have helped to create a truly fascist organization..."
"The decision to create ACT UP/D.C. was conceived when I and another
early member attended at OUT! rally. I had taken copious amounts of
LSD. We were impressed with the energy, and with the self- righteous
anger of the crowd."
"We conspired to bring into existence an activist group that... could
effectively exploit the media for its own ends, and that would work
covertly and break the law with impunity... Under the influence of
powerful, illicit drugs, it really seemed like a good idea" (emphasis
added).
That the group subscribed to consciously "subversive modes, drawn
largely from the voluminous Mein Kampf [by Adolf Hitler], which some of
us studied as a working model. As ACT UP/D.C. grew, we struck intently
and surgically into whatever institution we believed to stand in our
way..." (emphasis added).
"I have left ACT UP, more correctly, they have thrown me out for
insisting on the viability of individual dissent" (emphasis added).
Strange admissions indeed, about a group given to stridently accusing
its opposition of employing "neo-Nazi" tactics (one of which happens to
be accusing your opposition of acts and attitudes of which you are, in
fact, guilty). Evidently, this kind of gay extremist view readily
coincides with Adolf Hitler's opinion in Mein Kampf: "The victor will
never be asked if he told the truth."
A further sampling of Hitler's statements regarding use of the "big
lie" technique may provide insight into gay militants' use of
propaganda:
"The size of [a] lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed,
for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more
easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The
primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a
big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies
but would be ashamed to tell big ones" (Mein Kampf, British Foreign
Policy Association translation, 1935).
"Something therefore always remains and sticks from the most impudent
lies, a fact which all bodies and individuals concerned with the art of
lying in this world know only too well, and hence they stop at nothing
to achieve this end" (Ibid.)
"All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level,
that even the most stupid of those toward whom it is directed will
understand it. Therefore, the intellectual level of the propaganda must
be lower the larger the number of people who are to be influenced by
it" (Ibid., 14th edition, p. 197).
"Propaganda must not serve the truth, especially not insofar as it
might bring out something favorable for the opponent (Ibid., p. 260).
"Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be
made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider
the most wretched sort of life as paradise" (Ibid., p. 376).
Perhaps these admissions become more understandable in light of Judith
Reisman's as-yet-unpublished study of "gay culture" as revealed in the
national "mainstream" gay "slick" magazine The Advocate from 1972-1991.
Reisman concluded that, despite "homosexual claims of fascist
persecution -- and requisite `gay' loathing for fascism... In contrast
to similar straight publications, up to 5% of THE ADVOCATE [content]
glamorizes specifically nazi features and costume while the prevailing
`gay' tough guy culture (i.e., `thoughts, emotions, manners, tastes
habits, skills, art'... fits the key features of a fascist culture" (A
Content Analysis of THE ADVOCATE, 1972-1991, p. 57, Dr. Judith Reisman,
1992, used by permission of the author).
Reisman continues: "Overall, 72% of THE ADVOCATE data socialized a set
of core values -- glorified nazi dress, language and `blonde' Aryan
male beauty and brutality; contempt for `fems, fats' and blacks;
threats toward `politically incorrect'... homosexuals, churches and
others -- romanticizing `fascist' culture to a `younger generation.'
Nazi costumes/fascist concepts are a common component of THE ADVOCATE
and thus largely condoned by prevailing `gay' cultural values" (Ibid,
p. 57).
Reisman quotes a personal advertisement from the July 3, 1974, issue of
The Advocate: "NAZI ANYONE? For Info write to: National Socialist
League, Box 26496A, Los Angeles, CA 90026."
Reisman comments: "No equivalent straight magazine (TIME, NEWSWEEK) has
ever carried an advertisement to join the nazi party... Beyond the
general claims of gay supremacy and focus on dominant white muscle men
in black leather (symbols of nazi power) issues of THE ADVOCATE often
carry ads of men in fascist caps, wearing black SS-type hip boots or
carrying the inevitable SS whips and such. These culminate with ads
like the `Slave Ad' April 9, 1991: `ACHTONG! Teutonic Lord Muscle
Master...'" (Ibid, p. 57).
Gay extremists often attempt to gain sympathy by recalling the
extermination of thousands of homosexuals under the tyranny of Hitler's
Third Reich. But Reisman points out a paradox: "The World War II notion
of Hitler's persecution of homosexuals is based on his assault of
`fems' [many of whom were Hitler's political enemies] not gay nazi
supermen. Many of Hitler's `Inner Circle,' and the key men who
recruited for the party, and who led the party, including the most
brutal military brigades, the Storm Troopers (SA), and the Infantry
School -- were homosexual: Ernest Roehm [head of the SA], Rudolf Hess
and Gerhard Rossbach, while the infamous Goering was also said to be a
type of transvestite... Walter Langer, writing in The Mind of Adolf
Hitler (1972), noted that Rudolf Hess `was generally known as Fraulein
Anna.' There were many other [gays close to Hitler] and it was
supposed, for this reason, that Hitler too belonged in this category"
(Ibid, pp. 57-58).
Reisman adds in a footnote: "See Berthold Hinz, Art in the Third Reich
(Pantheon Books: New York, 1979) about the display of brazenly
homosexual nazi male imagery and concepts, and see especially S.
William Halperin, writing in Germany Tried Democracy: A Political
History of the Reich from 1918-1933 (Norton Books: New York, 1946).
Here, Halperin describes the role of public homosexual activists within
Hitler's nazi party, even to major posts of import" (Ibid, p. 65).
.
|
