| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
| Date: |
15 Mar 2006 06:20:32 AM |
| Object: |
Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
If Chung or whoever posts from Google Groups, they probably aren't
going to kill his account. People can get accounts anywhere and it's
useless for an ISP to ban someone, knowing that the person will just
come back in an hour with a new userid and continue to post.
Correct.
Further, crossposting is *not* abuse.
Correct again.
ISPs haven't considered it
abuse since the mid-90s, in my experience, and even then it was iffy.
No matter how much you hate crossposting, when you try to get an ISP to
cancel an account you're trying to prevent someone from posting their
opinions on a public forum. Disregarding the ethics involved in
allowing Person A to censor Person B, an ISP isn't going to set
themselves up for a lawsuit just so they can ban someone who is
crossposting.
Thankfully.
Spam is UCE, or unsolicited commercial email. Ages ago the term also
meant posting anything (commercial or not) to hundreds of newsgroups,
but that usage has falled by the wayside. I suspect someone
crossposting to, say, 10 groups is not considered a big deal by any
sysadmin and certainly won't be considered spam.
Correct.
If Chung threatens, harasses, or otherwise breaks the law, then you
have a point.
Instead, you have others threatening, harassing, and breaking the law.
In truth, attempts to censor someone is unlawful (unconstitutional).
Otherwise all you can do is ignore him.
If the LORD realizes the possibility of a global earthquake on 03/29/06
through HIS infinite will, there will be no ignoring HIM.
You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
| User: "GaryG" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 09:26:44 AM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142425232.460403.161040@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
If Chung or whoever posts from Google Groups, they probably aren't
going to kill his account. People can get accounts anywhere and it's
useless for an ISP to ban someone, knowing that the person will just
come back in an hour with a new userid and continue to post.
Correct.
Further, crossposting is *not* abuse.
Correct again.
ISPs haven't considered it
abuse since the mid-90s, in my experience, and even then it was iffy.
No matter how much you hate crossposting, when you try to get an ISP to
cancel an account you're trying to prevent someone from posting their
opinions on a public forum. Disregarding the ethics involved in
allowing Person A to censor Person B, an ISP isn't going to set
themselves up for a lawsuit just so they can ban someone who is
crossposting.
Thankfully.
Spam is UCE, or unsolicited commercial email. Ages ago the term also
meant posting anything (commercial or not) to hundreds of newsgroups,
but that usage has falled by the wayside. I suspect someone
crossposting to, say, 10 groups is not considered a big deal by any
sysadmin and certainly won't be considered spam.
Correct.
Of course, just because it's not illegal or a violation of TOS, doesn't mean
that there aren't a bunch of people who think of you as a loony *****
because of what you do.
GG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
19 Mar 2006 09:44:50 PM |
|
|
GaryG wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142425232.460403.161040@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
If Chung or whoever posts from Google Groups, they probably aren't
going to kill his account. People can get accounts anywhere and it's
useless for an ISP to ban someone, knowing that the person will just
come back in an hour with a new userid and continue to post.
Correct.
Further, crossposting is *not* abuse.
Correct again.
ISPs haven't considered it
abuse since the mid-90s, in my experience, and even then it was iffy.
No matter how much you hate crossposting, when you try to get an ISP to
cancel an account you're trying to prevent someone from posting their
opinions on a public forum. Disregarding the ethics involved in
allowing Person A to censor Person B, an ISP isn't going to set
themselves up for a lawsuit just so they can ban someone who is
crossposting.
Thankfully.
Spam is UCE, or unsolicited commercial email. Ages ago the term also
meant posting anything (commercial or not) to hundreds of newsgroups,
but that usage has falled by the wayside. I suspect someone
crossposting to, say, 10 groups is not considered a big deal by any
sysadmin and certainly won't be considered spam.
Correct.
Of course, just because it's not illegal or a violation of TOS, doesn't mean
that there aren't a bunch of people who think of you as a loony *****
because of what you do.
Without the LORD, your opinion will remain meaningless (Ecclesiates).
You will remain in my prayers, dear Gary whom I love, in Jesus'
most precious and holy name.
May GOD continue to draw you closer to HIM so that you will someday see
the following written on HIS thigh:
"KING of kings and LORD of lords."
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory for
03/29/06, cooking and nutrition that interest those following this
thread here during the next on-line chat (03/23/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barry OGrady" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
21 Mar 2006 09:42:12 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:44:50 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
GaryG wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142425232.460403.161040@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
If Chung or whoever posts from Google Groups, they probably aren't
going to kill his account. People can get accounts anywhere and it's
useless for an ISP to ban someone, knowing that the person will just
come back in an hour with a new userid and continue to post.
Correct.
Further, crossposting is *not* abuse.
Correct again.
ISPs haven't considered it
abuse since the mid-90s, in my experience, and even then it was iffy.
No matter how much you hate crossposting, when you try to get an ISP to
cancel an account you're trying to prevent someone from posting their
opinions on a public forum. Disregarding the ethics involved in
allowing Person A to censor Person B, an ISP isn't going to set
themselves up for a lawsuit just so they can ban someone who is
crossposting.
Thankfully.
Spam is UCE, or unsolicited commercial email. Ages ago the term also
meant posting anything (commercial or not) to hundreds of newsgroups,
but that usage has falled by the wayside. I suspect someone
crossposting to, say, 10 groups is not considered a big deal by any
sysadmin and certainly won't be considered spam.
Correct.
Of course, just because it's not illegal or a violation of TOS, doesn't mean
that there aren't a bunch of people who think of you as a loony *****
because of what you do.
Without the LORD, your opinion will remain meaningless (Ecclesiates).
Without a functioning brain you will never have an opinion.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Gary whom I love, in Jesus'
most precious and holy name.
May GOD continue to draw you closer to HIM so that you will someday see
the following written on HIS thigh:
"KING of kings and LORD of lords."
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory for
03/29/06, cooking and nutrition that interest those following this
thread here during the next on-line chat (03/23/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
You need help.
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
You need to get the LORD out of your life.
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Never give up, eh?
Andrew
Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
25 Mar 2006 05:09:34 AM |
|
|
Barry OGrady wrote:
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:44:50 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
GaryG wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142425232.460403.161040@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
If Chung or whoever posts from Google Groups, they probably aren't
going to kill his account. People can get accounts anywhere and it's
useless for an ISP to ban someone, knowing that the person will just
come back in an hour with a new userid and continue to post.
Correct.
Further, crossposting is *not* abuse.
Correct again.
ISPs haven't considered it
abuse since the mid-90s, in my experience, and even then it was iffy.
No matter how much you hate crossposting, when you try to get an ISP to
cancel an account you're trying to prevent someone from posting their
opinions on a public forum. Disregarding the ethics involved in
allowing Person A to censor Person B, an ISP isn't going to set
themselves up for a lawsuit just so they can ban someone who is
crossposting.
Thankfully.
Spam is UCE, or unsolicited commercial email. Ages ago the term also
meant posting anything (commercial or not) to hundreds of newsgroups,
but that usage has falled by the wayside. I suspect someone
crossposting to, say, 10 groups is not considered a big deal by any
sysadmin and certainly won't be considered spam.
Correct.
Of course, just because it's not illegal or a violation of TOS, doesn't mean
that there aren't a bunch of people who think of you as a loony *****
because of what you do.
Without the LORD, your opinion will remain meaningless (Ecclesiates).
Without a functioning brain you will never have an opinion.
Those who post here on USENET have automatically proven that they have
functioning brains.
Truth is simple.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory for
03/29/06, cooking and nutrition that interest those following this
thread here during the next on-line chat (03/30/06) from 5 to 6 pm EST,
LORD willing:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 06:58:27 AM |
|
|
(irrelevant ngs once again snipped to prevent further spamming)
Andrew B. Chung, braindead fundie liar, wrote:
If the LORD realizes the possibility of a global earthquake on 03/29/06
through HIS infinite will, there will be no ignoring HIM.
That is, _IF_ da lawd exists. Which it doesn't, fortunately.
--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...
Why I am not a christian:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus/nojebus
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 07:21:59 AM |
|
|
Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian wrote:
(irrelevant ngs once again snipped to prevent further spamming)
Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
Andrew B. Chung wrote:
If the LORD realizes the possibility of a global earthquake on 03/29/06
through HIS infinite will, there will be no ignoring HIM.
That is, _IF_ da lawd exists.
Rest assured that HE does.
Which it doesn't, fortunately.
No such thing as either fortunately or unfortunately... only HIM
(Proverbs 16:33).
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "DaveJr" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 08:42:16 AM |
|
|
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
Bird Flu eh? Perhaps you've heard the term "latest strain"? Thats
evolution!
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
More like brainwashed you. All allegories.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 09:17:50 AM |
|
|
DaveJr wrote:
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
Bird Flu eh? Perhaps you've heard the term "latest strain"? Thats
evolution!
No. That is purposeful mutation.
No such thing as random, chance, or accident (Proverbs 16:33)
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "DaveJr" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 04:33:41 PM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142435870.434810.197420@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake
advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread
here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
Bird Flu eh? Perhaps you've heard the term "latest strain"?
Thats
evolution!
No. That is purposeful mutation.
No such thing as random, chance, or accident (Proverbs 16:33)
Just the uneducated trying to spin. Evolution is a fact, deal with
it.
In the 21st century we know better. You can't reshape the evidence
to fit your delusional, psudo-scientific, magical, outdated, illogical
belief system. The evidence clearly has shown evolution to be
correct.
Your 'hoaky' allegories will fade to nothing in time.
If there is no such thing as random, chance, or accident....then you
would be no fun in Vegas.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
16 Mar 2006 05:57:03 AM |
|
|
DaveJr wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142435870.434810.197420@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake
advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread
here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
Bird Flu eh? Perhaps you've heard the term "latest strain"?
Thats
evolution!
No. That is purposeful mutation.
No such thing as random, chance, or accident (Proverbs 16:33)
Just the uneducated trying to spin.
No.
Evolution is a fact, deal with it.
It is a theory build on the assumption that there are **random**
mutations selected by **random** 'natural' forces (AKA natural
selection).
It is no accident that what destroys this theory is the futile attempt
to remove GOD by calling HIM **random**.
"Natural" events are acts of GOD. These acts include the Indian
Tsunami and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
In the 21st century we know better.
Indeed. Especially if the possibility of a devastating global
earthquake is realized on 03/29/06 through the LORD's infinite will.
You can't reshape the evidence
to fit your delusional, psudo-scientific, magical, outdated, illogical
belief system.
Instead, the LORD is the evidence. Indeed, HE is the source of all
knowledge and wisdom.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life" -- LORD Jesus Christ
The evidence clearly has shown evolution to be correct.
That is not what I discern.
Your 'hoaky' allegories will fade to nothing in time.
"Heaven and earth will pass away before MY words will pass away." --
LORD Jesus Christ
If there is no such thing as random, chance, or accident....then you
would be no fun in Vegas.
Again, without the LORD, there can be no joy. It remains my choice to
give glory and praise to GOD for everything that happens.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat today (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST this
evening:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "GaryG" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
16 Mar 2006 09:30:07 AM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142510223.164045.202630@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142435870.434810.197420@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake
advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread
here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
Bird Flu eh? Perhaps you've heard the term "latest strain"?
Thats
evolution!
No. That is purposeful mutation.
No such thing as random, chance, or accident (Proverbs 16:33)
Just the uneducated trying to spin.
No.
Evolution is a fact, deal with it.
It is a theory build on the assumption that there are **random**
mutations selected by **random** 'natural' forces (AKA natural
selection).
It is no accident that what destroys this theory is the futile attempt
to remove GOD by calling HIM **random**.
"Natural" events are acts of GOD. These acts include the Indian
Tsunami and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
In the 21st century we know better.
Indeed. Especially if the possibility of a devastating global
earthquake is realized on 03/29/06 through the LORD's infinite will.
You can't reshape the evidence
to fit your delusional, psudo-scientific, magical, outdated, illogical
belief system.
Instead, the LORD is the evidence. Indeed, HE is the source of all
knowledge and wisdom.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life" -- LORD Jesus Christ
The evidence clearly has shown evolution to be correct.
That is not what I discern.
Your 'hoaky' allegories will fade to nothing in time.
"Heaven and earth will pass away before MY words will pass away." --
LORD Jesus Christ
If there is no such thing as random, chance, or accident....then you
would be no fun in Vegas.
Again, without the LORD, there can be no joy. It remains my choice to
give glory and praise to GOD for everything that happens.
Based on your prolific pattern of "Cross-Posting for Christ(TM)", I don't
think your mental state allows for "choice" in these matters.
GG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
17 Mar 2006 05:28:11 AM |
|
|
GaryG wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142510223.164045.202630@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142435870.434810.197420@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake
advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread
here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
Bird Flu eh? Perhaps you've heard the term "latest strain"?
Thats
evolution!
No. That is purposeful mutation.
No such thing as random, chance, or accident (Proverbs 16:33)
Just the uneducated trying to spin.
No.
Evolution is a fact, deal with it.
It is a theory build on the assumption that there are **random**
mutations selected by **random** 'natural' forces (AKA natural
selection).
It is no accident that what destroys this theory is the futile attempt
to remove GOD by calling HIM **random**.
"Natural" events are acts of GOD. These acts include the Indian
Tsunami and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
In the 21st century we know better.
Indeed. Especially if the possibility of a devastating global
earthquake is realized on 03/29/06 through the LORD's infinite will.
You can't reshape the evidence
to fit your delusional, psudo-scientific, magical, outdated, illogical
belief system.
Instead, the LORD is the evidence. Indeed, HE is the source of all
knowledge and wisdom.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life" -- LORD Jesus Christ
The evidence clearly has shown evolution to be correct.
That is not what I discern.
Your 'hoaky' allegories will fade to nothing in time.
"Heaven and earth will pass away before MY words will pass away." --
LORD Jesus Christ
If there is no such thing as random, chance, or accident....then you
would be no fun in Vegas.
Again, without the LORD, there can be no joy. It remains my choice to
give glory and praise to GOD for everything that happens.
Based on your prolific pattern of "Cross-Posting for Christ(TM)", I don't
think your mental state allows for "choice" in these matters.
Without free will there can be neither love nor obedience.
Truth is simple.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Gary whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
May GOD continue to draw you closer to HIM.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/23/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "GaryG" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
17 Mar 2006 08:08:45 AM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142594891.730893.45750@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
GaryG wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142510223.164045.202630@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142435870.434810.197420@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other
things
like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake
advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this
thread
here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
Bird Flu eh? Perhaps you've heard the term "latest strain"?
Thats
evolution!
No. That is purposeful mutation.
No such thing as random, chance, or accident (Proverbs 16:33)
Just the uneducated trying to spin.
No.
Evolution is a fact, deal with it.
It is a theory build on the assumption that there are **random**
mutations selected by **random** 'natural' forces (AKA natural
selection).
It is no accident that what destroys this theory is the futile attempt
to remove GOD by calling HIM **random**.
"Natural" events are acts of GOD. These acts include the Indian
Tsunami and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
In the 21st century we know better.
Indeed. Especially if the possibility of a devastating global
earthquake is realized on 03/29/06 through the LORD's infinite will.
You can't reshape the evidence
to fit your delusional, psudo-scientific, magical, outdated,
illogical
belief system.
Instead, the LORD is the evidence. Indeed, HE is the source of all
knowledge and wisdom.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life" -- LORD Jesus Christ
The evidence clearly has shown evolution to be correct.
That is not what I discern.
Your 'hoaky' allegories will fade to nothing in time.
"Heaven and earth will pass away before MY words will pass away." --
LORD Jesus Christ
If there is no such thing as random, chance, or accident....then you
would be no fun in Vegas.
Again, without the LORD, there can be no joy. It remains my choice to
give glory and praise to GOD for everything that happens.
Based on your prolific pattern of "Cross-Posting for Christ(TM)", I
don't
think your mental state allows for "choice" in these matters.
Without free will there can be neither love nor obedience.
Truth is simple.
Thanks for posting, and proving my point!
GG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
17 Mar 2006 08:13:46 AM |
|
|
GaryG wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142594891.730893.45750@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
GaryG wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142510223.164045.202630@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142435870.434810.197420@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
DaveJr wrote:
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other
things
like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake
advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this
thread
here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
Bird Flu eh? Perhaps you've heard the term "latest strain"?
Thats
evolution!
No. That is purposeful mutation.
No such thing as random, chance, or accident (Proverbs 16:33)
Just the uneducated trying to spin.
No.
Evolution is a fact, deal with it.
It is a theory build on the assumption that there are **random**
mutations selected by **random** 'natural' forces (AKA natural
selection).
It is no accident that what destroys this theory is the futile attempt
to remove GOD by calling HIM **random**.
"Natural" events are acts of GOD. These acts include the Indian
Tsunami and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
In the 21st century we know better.
Indeed. Especially if the possibility of a devastating global
earthquake is realized on 03/29/06 through the LORD's infinite will.
You can't reshape the evidence
to fit your delusional, psudo-scientific, magical, outdated,
illogical
belief system.
Instead, the LORD is the evidence. Indeed, HE is the source of all
knowledge and wisdom.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life" -- LORD Jesus Christ
The evidence clearly has shown evolution to be correct.
That is not what I discern.
Your 'hoaky' allegories will fade to nothing in time.
"Heaven and earth will pass away before MY words will pass away." --
LORD Jesus Christ
If there is no such thing as random, chance, or accident....then you
would be no fun in Vegas.
Again, without the LORD, there can be no joy. It remains my choice to
give glory and praise to GOD for everything that happens.
Based on your prolific pattern of "Cross-Posting for Christ(TM)", I
don't
think your mental state allows for "choice" in these matters.
Without free will there can be neither love nor obedience.
Truth is simple.
Thanks for posting, and proving my point!
Without the LORD, there is only hypocrisy.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Gary whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
May GOD continue to draw you closer to HIM.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/23/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ShadowWolf" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
21 Mar 2006 02:02:23 AM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian wrote:
(irrelevant ngs once again snipped to prevent further spamming)
Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
Strangely, after checking a concordance, I find that the word "opinion" does
not occur in the book of Ecclesiates. Could you cite chapter and verse and
show me to be mistaken?
ShadowWolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
25 Mar 2006 05:09:48 AM |
|
|
ShadowWolf wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian wrote:
(irrelevant ngs once again snipped to prevent further spamming)
Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
Strangely, after checking a concordance, I find that the word "opinion" does
not occur in the book of Ecclesiates. Could you cite chapter and verse and
show me to be mistaken?
Would cite the entire book of Ecclesiastes... all 12 chapters in their
entirety taken as one whole.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory for
03/29/06, cooking and nutrition that interest those following this
thread here during the next on-line chat (03/30/06) from 5 to 6 pm EST,
LORD willing:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
19 Mar 2006 10:30:19 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam2@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1142428919.441044.99780@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian wrote:
(irrelevant ngs once again snipped to prevent further spamming)
Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
Nym-shifting mother fucker!! Re-re-re-re-PLONK
Sorry this advisory bothers you so terribly. Please forgive all my
iniquities.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Robyn whom I love, in Jesus'
most precious and holy name.
May GOD continue to draw you closer to HIM so that you will someday see
the following written on HIS thigh:
"KING of kings and LORD of lords."
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory for
03/29/06, cooking and nutrition that interest those following this
thread here during the next on-line chat (03/23/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 07:45:20 AM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
If Chung or whoever posts from Google Groups, they probably aren't
going to kill his account. People can get accounts anywhere and it's
useless for an ISP to ban someone, knowing that the person will just
come back in an hour with a new userid and continue to post.
Correct.
Further, crossposting is *not* abuse.
Correct again.
ISPs haven't considered it
abuse since the mid-90s, in my experience, and even then it was iffy.
No matter how much you hate crossposting, when you try to get an ISP to
cancel an account you're trying to prevent someone from posting their
opinions on a public forum. Disregarding the ethics involved in
allowing Person A to censor Person B, an ISP isn't going to set
themselves up for a lawsuit just so they can ban someone who is
crossposting.
Thankfully.
Spam is UCE, or unsolicited commercial email. Ages ago the term also
meant posting anything (commercial or not) to hundreds of newsgroups,
but that usage has falled by the wayside. I suspect someone
crossposting to, say, 10 groups is not considered a big deal by any
sysadmin and certainly won't be considered spam.
Correct.
If Chung threatens, harasses, or otherwise breaks the law, then you
have a point.
Instead, you have others threatening, harassing, and breaking the law.
In truth, attempts to censor someone is unlawful (unconstitutional).
Otherwise all you can do is ignore him.
If the LORD realizes the possibility of a global earthquake on 03/29/06
through HIS infinite will, there will be no ignoring HIM.
And, if it doesn't happen, that's God's infinite mercy, right?
You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
Kick of the dust as Jesus commanded and leave.
<snip>
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 09:18:35 AM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
HE has proven it already.
If Chung or whoever posts from Google Groups, they probably aren't
going to kill his account. People can get accounts anywhere and it's
useless for an ISP to ban someone, knowing that the person will just
come back in an hour with a new userid and continue to post.
Correct.
Further, crossposting is *not* abuse.
Correct again.
ISPs haven't considered it
abuse since the mid-90s, in my experience, and even then it was iffy.
No matter how much you hate crossposting, when you try to get an ISP to
cancel an account you're trying to prevent someone from posting their
opinions on a public forum. Disregarding the ethics involved in
allowing Person A to censor Person B, an ISP isn't going to set
themselves up for a lawsuit just so they can ban someone who is
crossposting.
Thankfully.
Spam is UCE, or unsolicited commercial email. Ages ago the term also
meant posting anything (commercial or not) to hundreds of newsgroups,
but that usage has falled by the wayside. I suspect someone
crossposting to, say, 10 groups is not considered a big deal by any
sysadmin and certainly won't be considered spam.
Correct.
If Chung threatens, harasses, or otherwise breaks the law, then you
have a point.
Instead, you have others threatening, harassing, and breaking the law.
In truth, attempts to censor someone is unlawful (unconstitutional).
Otherwise all you can do is ignore him.
If the LORD realizes the possibility of a global earthquake on 03/29/06
through HIS infinite will, there will be no ignoring HIM.
And, if it doesn't happen, that's God's infinite mercy, right?
Correct.
You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
Kick of the dust as Jesus commanded and leave.
LORD Jesus Christ has issued two commandments. Yours is not one of
them.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Daniel whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
May GOD continue to draw you closer to HIM.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 09:24:44 AM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
HE has proven it already.
Fine, then cite?
<snip to>
You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
Kick of the dust as Jesus commanded and leave.
LORD Jesus Christ has issued two commandments. Yours is not one of
them.
No, but Matthew says so.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 11:02:13 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:45:20 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
Perhaps you could entertain us with an attempt to prove (in a
scientific/mathematical way) that you love your spouse. Or your
mother as you may not have spouse, but everyone has a mother.
In fact there are many things in life that we accept without proof
(believe) because they are simply not subject to proof. I wonder if
confirmed atheists also reject belief in such things in addition to
rejecting faith in God.
John
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 01:30:20 PM |
|
|
"John" <john9212112@aol.com> wrote in message
news:oqhg12tnv5nh8v8fk2t13gnpu82c6qdg07@4ax.com...
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:45:20 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
Perhaps you could entertain us with an attempt to prove (in a
scientific/mathematical way) that you love your spouse. Or your
mother as you may not have spouse, but everyone has a mother.
No proof a god exists, huh? Thanks for sharing.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 07:45:00 PM |
|
|
John wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:45:20 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
Perhaps you could entertain us with an attempt to prove (in a
scientific/mathematical way) that you love your spouse.
False analogy. Love is a feeling, an emotion. God, as I come to know
it, is supposed to be an actuality.
Or your
mother as you may not have spouse, but everyone has a mother.
I haven't spoken to my mother in six years. Thanks for bringing *THAT*
painful subject up.
In fact there are many things in life that we accept without proof
(believe) because they are simply not subject to proof.
Except that belief is not synonymous with faith.
I wonder if
confirmed atheists also reject belief in such things in addition to
rejecting faith in God.
Don't confuse "faith" and "belief." I believe in a great many things...
things that actually exist. I just don't have faith in the nonexistant.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 10:16:22 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
John wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:45:20 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
Perhaps you could entertain us with an attempt to prove (in a
scientific/mathematical way) that you love your spouse.
False analogy. Love is a feeling, an emotion. God, as I come to know
it, is supposed to be an actuality.
HE is the Creator. Just as a house is proof of its builder, we are all
proof of our Creator.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Daniel whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
May GOD continue to draw you closer to HIM.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 10:30:22 PM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
John wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:45:20 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
Perhaps you could entertain us with an attempt to prove (in a
scientific/mathematical way) that you love your spouse.
False analogy. Love is a feeling, an emotion. God, as I come to know
it, is supposed to be an actuality.
HE is the Creator. Just as a house is proof of its builder, we are all
proof of our Creator.
Fallacy of argument from ignorance.
<snip>
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
15 Mar 2006 11:03:44 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
John wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:45:20 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
Perhaps you could entertain us with an attempt to prove (in a
scientific/mathematical way) that you love your spouse.
False analogy. Love is a feeling, an emotion. God, as I come to know
it, is supposed to be an actuality.
HE is the Creator. Just as a house is proof of its builder, we are all
proof of our Creator.
Fallacy of argument from ignorance.
Again, the LORD's purpose for my being here is to inform and not to
argue.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Daniel whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/16/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "DaveJr" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
16 Mar 2006 01:48:44 AM |
|
|
Again, the LORD's purpose for my being here is to inform and not to
argue.
"Again, the BORG's purpose for my being here is to brainwash
and not to learn"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
16 Mar 2006 07:25:21 AM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
John wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:45:20 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
Perhaps you could entertain us with an attempt to prove (in a
scientific/mathematical way) that you love your spouse.
False analogy. Love is a feeling, an emotion. God, as I come to know
it, is supposed to be an actuality.
HE is the Creator. Just as a house is proof of its builder, we are all
proof of our Creator.
Fallacy of argument from ignorance.
Again, the LORD's purpose for my being here is to inform and not to
argue.
We do not need "informing." We know all about the Bible; most of us
have read it more than you.
I can also inform you of the teachings of Albus Dumbledore.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
19 Mar 2006 11:14:19 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
John wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:45:20 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Glitter Ninja wrote:
"Dee Randall" <deedovey@shentel.net> writes:
<pluto@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1142363743.093958.319000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, believe it or not, all those crossposts are not abuse, as
defined by Google.
I've wondered about that. The default box that's checked on their
"Report abuse" form, though, says "This post is spam." I don't know if
they actually *do* anything about spam reports, but it certainly seems
like they intend to.
Google Groups doesn't own Usenet, first of all.
Correct.
So complaining to
Google about a certain post is silly. All Google does is archive Usenet
posts. There's no one owner or administrator of Usenet so there's no
one place you can go to complain about Chung.
Actually, there is GOD.
Prove it.
Perhaps you could entertain us with an attempt to prove (in a
scientific/mathematical way) that you love your spouse.
False analogy. Love is a feeling, an emotion. God, as I come to know
it, is supposed to be an actuality.
HE is the Creator. Just as a house is proof of its builder, we are all
proof of our Creator.
Fallacy of argument from ignorance.
Again, the LORD's purpose for my being here is to inform and not to
argue.
We do not need "informing."
That is not what I discern.
We know all about the Bible;
You do not know the living Word of GOD.
most of us
have read it more than you.
That is not evident.
I can also inform you of the teachings of Albus Dumbledore.
Q.E.D.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Daniel whom I love, in Jesus'
most precious and holy name.
May GOD continue to draw you closer to HIM so that you will someday see
the following written on HIS thigh:
"KING of kings and LORD of lords."
Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory for
03/29/06, cooking and nutrition that interest those following this
thread here during the next on-line chat (03/23/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:
http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8
.
|
|
|
| User: "ShadowWolf" |
|
| Title: Re: Global Earthquake Advisory for 03/29/06. |
20 Mar 2006 12:14:25 AM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
<snip>
We do not need "informing."
That is not what I discern.
Then your mind is screwed up. Most of the people here either don't want your
"informing" or, like me, know that you are a wack-job fundie that isn't a
true Christian.
We know all about the Bible;
You do not know the living Word of GOD.
Ah, but I do know about it. I have about 15 copies of various translations
laying around, and about the same in a dozen different languages on my
computer.
"Beware of false prophets and messiahs"
"Even the Devil can appear as an angel of light"
Those two are things I use as helpful guides when I run across idiots like
you.
most of us
have read it more than you.
That is not evident.
Possibly true. However, is it not "lean not unto your own understanding" ?
The Revelation of John is the events that occur after the Rapture and during
the time of the Tribulation. Since the Rapture has yet to occur, the
Revelation cannot be happening. Furthermore, you pick Rev 6:12 as the basis
for your claim. What happened to the 4 horsemen, who are said to appear in
Rev 6:1-8 ?
You will remain in my prayers, dear Daniel whom I love, in Jesus'
most precious and holy name.
The prayers of those who would lead people with false teachings are prayers
to the devil. I will not accept them, and I'm sure my friend DanielSan
doesn't need them.
ShadowWolf
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
