| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
| Date: |
21 Feb 2005 05:46:05 PM |
| Object: |
god admits he kills people |
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again will
I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ] every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
.
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
21 Feb 2005 05:56:31 PM |
|
|
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:1puSd.7975$x53.7369@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again
will I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ] every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Ok, which is it; do you not believe in God?
Or are you simply ***** at Him?
.
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
21 Feb 2005 06:00:03 PM |
|
|
I am simply pointing out that the religious people are WORSHIPPING a SERIAL
KILLER
Personally, I wouldn't worship anyone that openly ADMITS to MULTIPLE COUNTS
OF MURDER.
"DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:PyuSd.14520$uc.9766@trnddc09...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:1puSd.7975$x53.7369@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again
will I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ] every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Ok, which is it; do you not believe in God?
Or are you simply ***** at Him?
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
21 Feb 2005 10:27:25 PM |
|
|
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:7CuSd.3274$Ba3.1098@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I am simply pointing out that the religious people are WORSHIPPING a SERIAL
KILLER
Personally, I wouldn't worship anyone that openly ADMITS to MULTIPLE
COUNTS OF MURDER.
You really need to read the whole book, y'know. There's more to the story
than that, but then, I've pointed this out before and you refuse to get it,
so...
I'll go with one of these two theories: either you believe in Him and are
just really, really mad at Him, or you have made up your own version of God
to debunk, figuring that if you debunk YOUR version, that automatically
debunks all versions.
Either way, you don't make a great deal of sense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 11:55:43 AM |
|
|
"DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:NwySd.32774$uc.24941@trnddc08...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:7CuSd.3274$Ba3.1098@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I am simply pointing out that the religious people are WORSHIPPING a
SERIAL KILLER
Personally, I wouldn't worship anyone that openly ADMITS to MULTIPLE
COUNTS OF MURDER.
You really need to read the whole book, y'know. There's more to the story
than that, but then, I've pointed this out before and you refuse to get
it, so...
I'll go with one of these two theories: either you believe in Him and are
just really, really mad at Him, or you have made up your own version of
God to debunk, figuring that if you debunk YOUR version, that
automatically debunks all versions.
Either way, you don't make a great deal of sense.
Er okay for the sake or argument....there is a god, the great flood as in
Noahs ark really did happen. Under developed countries generally tend to
high population of children compared to adults. This means the god you
worship wilfully and deliberately killed millions of childrens. Not to
mention all the millions upon millions of animals who surely couldn't of
done anything wrong because he was a bit ***** at a minority of the
life on earth.
But that's okay by you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 12:36:43 PM |
|
|
"kathryn" <bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote in message
news:cvfrmv$70n$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
"DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:NwySd.32774$uc.24941@trnddc08...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:7CuSd.3274$Ba3.1098@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I am simply pointing out that the religious people are WORSHIPPING a
SERIAL KILLER
Personally, I wouldn't worship anyone that openly ADMITS to MULTIPLE
COUNTS OF MURDER.
You really need to read the whole book, y'know. There's more to the story
than that, but then, I've pointed this out before and you refuse to get
it, so...
I'll go with one of these two theories: either you believe in Him and are
just really, really mad at Him, or you have made up your own version of
God to debunk, figuring that if you debunk YOUR version, that
automatically debunks all versions.
Either way, you don't make a great deal of sense.
Er okay for the sake or argument....there is a god, the great flood as in
Noahs ark really did happen. Under developed countries generally tend to
high population of children compared to adults. This means the god you
worship wilfully and deliberately killed millions of childrens. Not to
mention all the millions upon millions of animals who surely couldn't of
done anything wrong all because he was a bit ***** at a minority of
the life on earth.
But that's okay by you.
I apologise for a lack of punctuation in that paragraph, which would of
resulted in it making more sense. I must remember to proof read before
posting.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 09:02:46 AM |
|
|
DianaC wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:7CuSd.3274$Ba3.1098@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I am simply pointing out that the religious people are WORSHIPPING a
SERIAL
KILLER
Personally, I wouldn't worship anyone that openly ADMITS to
MULTIPLE
COUNTS OF MURDER.
You really need to read the whole book, y'know. There's more to the
story
than that, but then, I've pointed this out before and you refuse to
get it,
so...
Of coarse he does not get it because it is wrong.
The whole book is merely the sum of its parts and
therefore it is reasonable to examine the parts.
I'll go with one of these two theories: either you believe in Him and
are
just really, really mad at Him, or you have made up your own version
of God
to debunk, figuring that if you debunk YOUR version, that
automatically
debunks all versions.
The story of Noah is in the Bible, SheBlew did not make it
up. It seems that no matter how you look at the story,
God comes out of looking more like a devil than a benevolant
God.
The previous author is not mad at God, he is mad at
people who abandon logic for fables in order to
either feel good or control others.
Larry
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 12:16:44 PM |
|
|
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1109084566.646990.260760@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
DianaC wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:7CuSd.3274$Ba3.1098@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I am simply pointing out that the religious people are WORSHIPPING a
SERIAL
KILLER
Personally, I wouldn't worship anyone that openly ADMITS to
MULTIPLE
COUNTS OF MURDER.
You really need to read the whole book, y'know. There's more to the
story
than that, but then, I've pointed this out before and you refuse to
get it,
so...
Of coarse he does not get it because it is wrong.
The whole book is merely the sum of its parts and
therefore it is reasonable to examine the parts.
Which looks good on the surface, BUT.....there is a logical fallacy called
(in layman's terms) a 'fallacy of composition"; that is, arguing that
because the attributes of the parts of a whole have a certain property, that
the whole has that property; in other words, if one verse is about
something, the whole book is about THAT something.
Indeed you are correct; it is reasonable to examine the parts. ALL the
parts, in context, not just pick and choose the ones that serve your purpose
(in this case, charging deity with murder) especially when examining the
context completely changes the idea and invalidates the charge.
I'll go with one of these two theories: either you believe in Him and
are
just really, really mad at Him, or you have made up your own version
of God
to debunk, figuring that if you debunk YOUR version, that
automatically
debunks all versions.
The story of Noah is in the Bible, SheBlew did not make it
up. It seems that no matter how you look at the story,
God comes out of looking more like a devil than a benevolant
God.
Unless of course you take the story of Noah and put it into context with the
entire idea of deity as viewed by the bible. Things change somewhat then.
The previous author is not mad at God, he is mad at
people who abandon logic for fables in order to
either feel good or control others.
The previous author is making assinine and inflammatory charges about theism
to atheists (I suppose to get a back pat) and to theists (I would hope that
the motive was to enlighten and inform, but in actuallity, all s/he does is
denigrate and mock).
the thing is, your logic is faulty. the whole point behind theism is that
deity is SUPPOSED to be the creator, there is SUPPOSED to be an afterlife,
and thus deity has an entirely different, and very much larger, perspective
on this than we do.
Your argument is a little like charging a pediatrician with assault because
he sticks a three year old with a very big needle and makes him bleed; why?
Because if the three year old did it, it WOULD be assault.
If you or I deliberately end the life of another for reasons other than self
defense or other lawful reasons, it's murder. God, remember, (if you take
deity in CONTEXT) is supposed to know precisely what happens after death,
that there IS a life after death, and that He is in charge of the whole
thing. Therefore, for HIM, and only Him, it's not murder.
(shrug) Context is everything, whether you actually believe in things or
not. If you don't treat a belief system you don't share in context, the
believer isn't going to pay attention to you, y'know. Nor should he.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 11:54:46 PM |
|
|
DianaC wrote:
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1109084566.646990.260760@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
DianaC wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:7CuSd.3274$Ba3.1098@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I am simply pointing out that the religious people are
WORSHIPPING a
SERIAL
KILLER
Personally, I wouldn't worship anyone that openly ADMITS to
MULTIPLE
COUNTS OF MURDER.
You really need to read the whole book, y'know. There's more to
the
story
than that, but then, I've pointed this out before and you refuse
to
get it,
so...
Of coarse he does not get it because it is wrong.
The whole book is merely the sum of its parts and
therefore it is reasonable to examine the parts.
Which looks good on the surface, BUT.....there is a logical fallacy
called
(in layman's terms) a 'fallacy of composition"; that is, arguing that
because the attributes of the parts of a whole have a certain
property, that
the whole has that property; in other words, if one verse is about
something, the whole book is about THAT something.
Indeed that would be a fallacy. But that is not what has been
argued, it has been argued that this supposed act of God
is contrary to our sense of morality and thus either God
is immoral or it is not what God actually did. This certainly
does call into question the character of God because if correct,
no matter what he does later, it shows that he can and does do things
which
are not good for the human race.
Indeed you are correct; it is reasonable to examine the parts. ALL
the
parts, in context, not just pick and choose the ones that serve your
purpose
(in this case, charging deity with murder) especially when examining
the
context completely changes the idea and invalidates the charge.
I agree that it must be taken in context, however I cannot
hold in my mind and argue the entire Bible either
for or against because no mind can hold that much information
at once. It must be studied piece by piece.
I'll go with one of these two theories: either you believe in Him
and
are
just really, really mad at Him, or you have made up your own
version
of God
to debunk, figuring that if you debunk YOUR version, that
automatically
debunks all versions.
The story of Noah is in the Bible, SheBlew did not make it
up. It seems that no matter how you look at the story,
God comes out of looking more like a devil than a benevolent
God.
Unless of course you take the story of Noah and put it into context
with the
entire idea of deity as viewed by the bible. Things change somewhat
then.
The previous author is not mad at God, he is mad at
people who abandon logic for fables in order to
either feel good or control others.
The previous author is making assinine and inflammatory charges about
theism
to atheists (I suppose to get a back pat) and to theists (I would
hope that
the motive was to enlighten and inform, but in actuallity, all s/he
does is
denigrate and mock).
I will not deny that s/he used a very negative tone, however that
does not make him wrong.
the thing is, your logic is faulty. the whole point behind theism is
that
deity is SUPPOSED to be the creator, there is SUPPOSED to be an
afterlife,
and thus deity has an entirely different, and very much larger,
perspective
on this than we do.
Here we cut to the chase. Is whatever God wants to do moral or is
there
some other logic or principle that exists that he must follow too. If
any
whim he has defines right and wring, then human beings cannot
hope to understand what right and wrong are, but if God is good
because he follows principles we can observe and understand,
then we can define morality without him.
Your argument is a little like charging a pediatrician with assault
because
he sticks a three year old with a very big needle and makes him
bleed; why?
Because if the three year old did it, it WOULD be assault.
If you or I deliberately end the life of another for reasons other
than self
defense or other lawful reasons, it's murder. God, remember, (if you
take
deity in CONTEXT) is supposed to know precisely what happens after
death,
that there IS a life after death, and that He is in charge of the
whole
thing. Therefore, for HIM, and only Him, it's not murder.
Your argument is like saying a child raised puppies and after
creating several dozen dogs, decided he did not like them and so
he drowned them.
Now you say God knew of the after life and created them, but since they
were sinners, would they not all go to eternal torture?
It seems God created these things, decided that they were not
as he liked, destroyed them and then turned them over for eternal
torture. What is it about this scenario is there that you
think is good? From your previous writing I assume it is
that God later offers mankind eternal paradise, but does this
make up for the earlier unspeakable horror that was done?
Larry
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
23 Feb 2005 09:55:04 AM |
|
|
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1109138086.171781.140120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
<snip>
Of coarse he does not get it because it is wrong.
The whole book is merely the sum of its parts and
therefore it is reasonable to examine the parts.
Which looks good on the surface, BUT.....there is a logical fallacy
called
(in layman's terms) a 'fallacy of composition"; that is, arguing that
because the attributes of the parts of a whole have a certain
property, that
the whole has that property; in other words, if one verse is about
something, the whole book is about THAT something.
Indeed that would be a fallacy. But that is not what has been
argued, it has been argued that this supposed act of God
is contrary to our sense of morality and thus either God
is immoral or it is not what God actually did. This certainly
does call into question the character of God because if correct,
no matter what he does later, it shows that he can and does do things
which
are not good for the human race.
You have a point. I think we can narrow this down to 'that's not what God
actually did', here, because IN CONTEXT, it's not.
Indeed you are correct; it is reasonable to examine the parts. ALL
the
parts, in context, not just pick and choose the ones that serve your
purpose
(in this case, charging deity with murder) especially when examining
the
context completely changes the idea and invalidates the charge.
I agree that it must be taken in context, however I cannot
hold in my mind and argue the entire Bible either
for or against because no mind can hold that much information
at once. It must be studied piece by piece.
If you can't put the pieces together into a single context, you will never
get at the truth of the pieces. Rather like having three puzzle pieces that
may or may not be important to the rest of the puzzle--which is missing.
I'll go with one of these two theories: either you believe in Him
and
are
just really, really mad at Him, or you have made up your own
version
of God
to debunk, figuring that if you debunk YOUR version, that
automatically
debunks all versions.
The story of Noah is in the Bible, SheBlew did not make it
up. It seems that no matter how you look at the story,
God comes out of looking more like a devil than a benevolent
God.
Unless of course you take the story of Noah and put it into context
with the
entire idea of deity as viewed by the bible. Things change somewhat
then.
The previous author is not mad at God, he is mad at
people who abandon logic for fables in order to
either feel good or control others.
The previous author is making assinine and inflammatory charges about
theism
to atheists (I suppose to get a back pat) and to theists (I would
hope that
the motive was to enlighten and inform, but in actuallity, all s/he
does is
denigrate and mock).
I will not deny that s/he used a very negative tone, however that
does not make him wrong.
No. THAT doesn't. The illogic does.
the thing is, your logic is faulty. the whole point behind theism is
that
deity is SUPPOSED to be the creator, there is SUPPOSED to be an
afterlife,
and thus deity has an entirely different, and very much larger,
perspective
on this than we do.
Here we cut to the chase. Is whatever God wants to do moral or is
there
some other logic or principle that exists that he must follow too. If
any
whim he has defines right and wring, then human beings cannot
hope to understand what right and wrong are, but if God is good
because he follows principles we can observe and understand,
then we can define morality without him.
Ah. Now THAT'S a false dichotomy if I ever saw one! Either He is impossible
to understand or he has to go by the same laws we do, and either way we can
do without him? Er....
Your argument is a little like charging a pediatrician with assault
because
he sticks a three year old with a very big needle and makes him
bleed; why?
Because if the three year old did it, it WOULD be assault.
If you or I deliberately end the life of another for reasons other
than self
defense or other lawful reasons, it's murder. God, remember, (if you
take
deity in CONTEXT) is supposed to know precisely what happens after
death,
that there IS a life after death, and that He is in charge of the
whole
thing. Therefore, for HIM, and only Him, it's not murder.
Your argument is like saying a child raised puppies and after
creating several dozen dogs, decided he did not like them and so
he drowned them.
Not a bit. You are ignoring context; the child is ending life; he and the
dogs are both mortal. IT's more like, oh, a CEO who looks at the guys in the
mail room, decides that THIS one is not a good fit there and tells him to
come see him. Everybody else there thinks that the guy was fired; how are
they going to know differently? But in reality the guy just got a promotion.
Now you say God knew of the after life and created them, but since they
were sinners, would they not all go to eternal torture?
Context is all. There ARE theists who believe this; it's called Calvinism.
It's not a belief I share. Nor is it a believe that every theist shares by
any means.
There are systems out there which posit that there is no 'eternal torture',
y'know. And if you are going to argue against what *I* believe, you will
have to throw that idea out of your discourse. ;-) How in hell can I be
expected to defend a view I don't hold?
It seems God created these things, decided that they were not
as he liked, destroyed them and then turned them over for eternal
torture. What is it about this scenario is there that you
think is good?
Not a thing. However, since I don't believe that's what happens...
From your previous writing I assume it is
that God later offers mankind eternal paradise, but does this
make up for the earlier unspeakable horror that was done?
WHAT 'earlier unspeakable horror'? We all die. Every one of us. Whether
that is evolution making way for a new generation or God ending a test
period--or both (or whatever one's personal belief system dictates) we all
die. Most of the violent human deaths are inflicted by humans, and how is
that God's fault?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
23 Feb 2005 04:48:25 PM |
|
|
DianaC wrote:
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1109138086.171781.140120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
<snip>
I agree that it must be taken in context, however I cannot
hold in my mind and argue the entire Bible either
for or against because no mind can hold that much information
at once. It must be studied piece by piece.
If you can't put the pieces together into a single context, you will
never
get at the truth of the pieces. Rather like having three puzzle
pieces that
may or may not be important to the rest of the puzzle--which is
missing.
You tell me, what is the Bible good for? Perhaps then we can examine
if
indeed it is good for anything. The God as described in the
Bible is jealous, kills human beings in fits of rage and sometimes
shows remorse. Hardly a being I would choose to worship.
snipage
the thing is, your logic is faulty. the whole point behind
theism is that deity is SUPPOSED to be the creator,
there is SUPPOSED to be an afterlife, and thus deity
has an entirely different, and very much larger,
perspective on this than we do.
Here we cut to the chase. Is whatever God wants to do moral or is
there
some other logic or principle that exists that he must
follow too. If any whim he has defines right and wring,
then human beings cannot hope to understand what right
and wrong are, but if God is good
because he follows principles we can observe and understand,
then we can define morality without him.
Ah. Now THAT'S a false dichotomy if I ever saw one! Either He is
impossible
to understand or he has to go by the same laws we do, and either way
we can
do without him? Er....
You claim it is false dichotomy but you do not argue against it,
please point out the errors. BTW, this argument was first put
forth by Plato.
snipage
Your argument is like saying a child raised puppies and after
creating several dozen dogs, decided he did not like them and so
he drowned them.
Not a bit. You are ignoring context; the child is ending life; he and
the
dogs are both mortal. IT's more like, oh, a CEO who looks at the guys
in the
mail room, decides that THIS one is not a good fit there and tells
him to
come see him. Everybody else there thinks that the guy was fired; how
are
they going to know differently? But in reality the guy just got a
promotion.
I assume from your answer that you would want God to promote
you as soon as possible. You appear to imply that life is not
worth much.
Now you say God knew of the after life and created them, but since
they
were sinners, would they not all go to eternal torture?
Context is all. There ARE theists who believe this; it's called
Calvinism.
It's not a belief I share. Nor is it a believe that every theist
shares by
any means.
This is not a problem of context, but my incorrect assumption of
your beliefs. It is impossible to know exactly what you believe since
the Christian faith has so many flavors, my apologies.
snipage
From your previous writing I assume it is
that God later offers mankind eternal paradise, but does this
make up for the earlier unspeakable horror that was done?
WHAT 'earlier unspeakable horror'? We all die. Every one of us.
Whether
that is evolution making way for a new generation or God ending a
test
period--or both (or whatever one's personal belief system dictates)
we all
die. Most of the violent human deaths are inflicted by humans, and
how is
that God's fault?
My life is precious to me. You seem to imply that death
is no big deal. I think those how have seen the
after math of Hiroshima and 9-11 might disagree with
you here as I do. You are right however that we
do all die. I for one want to live as long as
my health holds out.
Larry
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
23 Feb 2005 10:42:34 PM |
|
|
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1109198905.550901.166220@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip to>
You tell me, what is the Bible good for? Perhaps then we can examine
if
indeed it is good for anything. The God as described in the
Bible is jealous, kills human beings in fits of rage and sometimes
shows remorse. Hardly a being I would choose to worship.
Read the whole thing. And then read all the books those guys in 400 AD
didn't think were good enough to put in it. Then listen to those who do
believe in it, and put all of it together.
Now me, I think the bible is good for a lot of things. It's good for the
mythology, (and mythology doesn't always have to be FALSE, y'know) it's good
to see what different perspectives are from different levels of technology
and different cultures, it's good for finding out what people who lived two
to five thousand years ago found important; that we still find important.
And that's what it's good for if you DON'T believe in it's divine nature.
Since you are one of those, it doesn't matter to you what it's good for to
those who do believe that it contains the word of God, does it?
snipage
the thing is, your logic is faulty. the whole point behind
theism is that deity is SUPPOSED to be the creator,
there is SUPPOSED to be an afterlife, and thus deity
has an entirely different, and very much larger,
perspective on this than we do.
Here we cut to the chase. Is whatever God wants to do moral or is
there
some other logic or principle that exists that he must
follow too. If any whim he has defines right and wring,
then human beings cannot hope to understand what right
and wrong are, but if God is good
because he follows principles we can observe and understand,
then we can define morality without him.
Ah. Now THAT'S a false dichotomy if I ever saw one! Either He is
impossible
to understand or he has to go by the same laws we do, and either way
we can
do without him? Er....
You claim it is false dichotomy but you do not argue against it,
please point out the errors. BTW, this argument was first put
forth by Plato.
And that makes it gospel?
You do realize that most of what Plato wrote was him telling us what
Socrates said. Indeed, that's very like the bible, in a way....and it's
still a false dichotomy. Plato was not deity, nor did he claim to be so.
It's interesting that you are quoting him as if he were the prophet of one.
;-)
Consider; there are many things that we understand now that we didn't
understand even thirty years ago. How the immune system works, for instance.
We still vaccinated children against polio and small pox. There are many
things that we don't understand now that we hope to understand in the
future; but the fact that we don't understand how things work does not stop
us from using those things. We go with what we know, work on learning more
so that when we do know more, we can do more. But we don't dismiss the idea
of, say, tornados just because we don't know exactly how they form and how
they operate. Therefore, ignoring something, even deity, because we don't
understand him yet....not logical.
As to expecting one to operate by the same rules we do; good grief.
We don't even expect that of EACH OTHER. Consider; two men have very sharp
implements. They both stick a knife into the heart of another person. One is
convicted for murder, the other--well, he's a cardiac surgeon. He gets paid
very well by greatful patients whose hearts he has cut into. The difference
is, the surgeon knows what he is doing.
God knows what he is doing. We don't. We may think we do, we may sincerely
believe we do, but we don't KNOW. If God is, then by definition, he does
indeed know. As in, KNOW. That makes all the difference, as it does to the
surgeon and the twit on the street with a knife and an urge to stab
somebody.
So you can see where this is a false dichotomy; there are many other choices
available here, and only the two most extreme were mentioned.
snipage
Your argument is like saying a child raised puppies and after
creating several dozen dogs, decided he did not like them and so
he drowned them.
Not a bit. You are ignoring context; the child is ending life; he and
the
dogs are both mortal. IT's more like, oh, a CEO who looks at the guys
in the
mail room, decides that THIS one is not a good fit there and tells
him to
come see him. Everybody else there thinks that the guy was fired; how
are
they going to know differently? But in reality the guy just got a
promotion.
I assume from your answer that you would want God to promote
you as soon as possible. You appear to imply that life is not
worth much.
We aren't talking about me. We are talking about deity. In context. Try a
different strawman here, eh?
Now you say God knew of the after life and created them, but since
they
were sinners, would they not all go to eternal torture?
Context is all. There ARE theists who believe this; it's called
Calvinism.
It's not a belief I share. Nor is it a believe that every theist
shares by
any means.
This is not a problem of context, but my incorrect assumption of
your beliefs. It is impossible to know exactly what you believe since
the Christian faith has so many flavors, my apologies.
You are quite right. Christianity comes in all flavors. For that reason, it
is usually a good idea to find out the flavor of the belief held by your
opponent before you start attacking what you think theirs is. If you don't,
you will always get it wrong somewhere, I guarantee it. ;-)
By 'context' I meant exactly that, actually; you need to find out the
context of the deity your opponent believes in and work with that. If you
don't, you are going to try to convince a Catholic that God is awful because
Martin Luther was an anti-semite. Trust me, you won't get very far doing
that. ;-)
snipage
From your previous writing I assume it is
that God later offers mankind eternal paradise, but does this
make up for the earlier unspeakable horror that was done?
WHAT 'earlier unspeakable horror'? We all die. Every one of us.
Whether
that is evolution making way for a new generation or God ending a
test
period--or both (or whatever one's personal belief system dictates)
we all
die. Most of the violent human deaths are inflicted by humans, and
how is
that God's fault?
My life is precious to me. You seem to imply that death
is no big deal. I think those how have seen the
after math of Hiroshima and 9-11 might disagree with
you here as I do. You are right however that we
do all die. I for one want to live as long as
my health holds out.
As do we all, except certain Muslim terrorists....
But death isn't as big a deal as all that. It's simply the final life
experience.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
01 Mar 2005 10:11:41 AM |
|
|
DianaC wrote:
<lseib@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> wrote in message
news:1109198905.550901.166220@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip to>
You tell me, what is the Bible good for? Perhaps then we can
examine
if
indeed it is good for anything. The God as described in the
Bible is jealous, kills human beings in fits of rage and sometimes
shows remorse. Hardly a being I would choose to worship.
Read the whole thing. And then read all the books those guys in 400
AD
didn't think were good enough to put in it. Then listen to those who
do
believe in it, and put all of it together.
Now me, I think the bible is good for a lot of things. It's good for
the
mythology, (and mythology doesn't always have to be FALSE, y'know)
it's good
to see what different perspectives are from different levels of
technology
and different cultures, it's good for finding out what people who
lived two
to five thousand years ago found important; that we still find
important.
And that's what it's good for if you DON'T believe in it's divine
nature.
Since you are one of those, it doesn't matter to you what it's good
for to
those who do believe that it contains the word of God, does it?
snipage
the thing is, your logic is faulty. the whole point behind
theism is that deity is SUPPOSED to be the creator,
there is SUPPOSED to be an afterlife, and thus deity
has an entirely different, and very much larger,
perspective on this than we do.
Here we cut to the chase. Is whatever God wants to
do moral or is there
some other logic or principle that exists that he must
follow too. If any whim he has defines right and wring,
then human beings cannot hope to understand what right
and wrong are, but if God is good
because he follows principles we can observe and understand,
then we can define morality without him.
Ah. Now THAT'S a false dichotomy if I ever saw one! Either He is
impossible
to understand or he has to go by the same laws we do, and either
way
we can
do without him? Er....
You claim it is false dichotomy but you do not argue against it,
please point out the errors. BTW, this argument was first put
forth by Plato.
And that makes it gospel?
Of coarse not, it is based on logic, much more believable
than the gospels.
You do realize that most of what Plato wrote was him telling us what
Socrates said. Indeed, that's very like the bible, in a way....and
it's
still a false dichotomy. Plato was not deity, nor did he claim to be
so.
It's interesting that you are quoting him as if he were the prophet
of one.
;-)
Consider; there are many things that we understand now that we didn't
understand even thirty years ago. How the immune system works, for
instance.
We still vaccinated children against polio and small pox. There are
many
things that we don't understand now that we hope to understand in the
future; but the fact that we don't understand how things work does
not stop
us from using those things. We go with what we know, work on learning
more
so that when we do know more, we can do more. But we don't dismiss
the idea
of, say, tornados just because we don't know exactly how they form
and how
they operate. Therefore, ignoring something, even deity, because we
don't
understand him yet....not logical.
As to expecting one to operate by the same rules we do; good grief.
We don't even expect that of EACH OTHER. Consider; two men have very
sharp
implements. They both stick a knife into the heart of another person.
One is
convicted for murder, the other--well, he's a cardiac surgeon. He
gets paid
very well by greatful patients whose hearts he has cut into. The
difference
is, the surgeon knows what he is doing.
God knows what he is doing. We don't. We may think we do, we may
sincerely
believe we do, but we don't KNOW. If God is, then by definition, he
does
indeed know. As in, KNOW. That makes all the difference, as it does
to the
surgeon and the twit on the street with a knife and an urge to stab
somebody.
So you can see where this is a false dichotomy; there are many other
choices
available here, and only the two most extreme were mentioned.
You say there are things we do not understand and then conclude my
argument
was false because there must be other choices. That is like saying
2+2 does not have to equal 4 because we do not know everything.
While it is true we do not know everything, it does not alter the
fact that 2+2 equals 4.
My argument is simple. Either morality is based entirely on God,
or it is not. This is not a false dichotomy. Either way certain
conclusions can be drawn.
snipage
Your argument is like saying a child raised puppies and after
creating several dozen dogs, decided he did not like them and so
he drowned them.
Not a bit. You are ignoring context; the child is ending life;
he and the dogs are both mortal. IT's more like, oh, a CEO who
looks at the guys in the mail room, decides that THIS one is not
a good fit there and tells him to come see him. Everybody else
there thinks that the guy was fired; how are they going to know
differently? But in reality the guy just got a
promotion.
I assume from your answer that you would want God to promote
you as soon as possible. You appear to imply that life is not
worth much.
We aren't talking about me. We are talking about deity. In
context. Try a different strawman here, eh?
This is not straw man, you wrote that death is like getting a
promotion from God.
Now you say God knew of the after life and created them, but
since
they
were sinners, would they not all go to eternal torture?
Context is all. There ARE theists who believe this; it's called
Calvinism.
It's not a belief I share. Nor is it a believe that every theist
shares by
any means.
This is not a problem of context, but my incorrect assumption of
your beliefs. It is impossible to know exactly what you believe
since
the Christian faith has so many flavors, my apologies.
You are quite right. Christianity comes in all flavors. For that
reason, it
is usually a good idea to find out the flavor of the belief held by
your
opponent before you start attacking what you think theirs is. If you
don't,
you will always get it wrong somewhere, I guarantee it. ;-)
So there is nothing that all Christians have in common.
snipage
From your previous writing I assume it is
that God later offers mankind eternal paradise, but does this
make up for the earlier unspeakable horror that was done?
WHAT 'earlier unspeakable horror'? We all die.
Every one of us. Whether that is evolution making
way for a new generation or God ending a test
period--or both (or whatever one's personal belief
system dictates) we all die.
Most of the violent
human deaths are inflicted by humans, and how is
that God's fault?
My life is precious to me. You seem to imply that death
is no big deal. I think those how have seen the
after math of Hiroshima and 9-11 might disagree with
you here as I do. You are right however that we
do all die. I for one want to live as long as
my health holds out.
As do we all, except certain Muslim terrorists....
But death isn't as big a deal as all that. It's simply the final life
experience.
IF death and dismemberment are not unspeakable horror,
then nothing is. The bible Claims God told the Jews
to murder women and children during their raids
in the promised land. That on top of his direct destruction
of cites by fire and flood. These are the horrors I was talking
God claims to punish people for things there great-grandfather did,
thing that they had nothing to do with. This is the God you worship
and define as "love"
Larry
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
21 Feb 2005 06:20:43 PM |
|
|
In article <PyuSd.14520$uc.9766@trnddc09> "DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:1puSd.7975$x53.7369@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again
will I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ] every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Ok, which is it; do you not believe in God?
Or are you simply ***** at Him?
I'd settle for "*****". A human father who shot
all but a couple of his kids, then torched the house --
all because the kids were disobedient -- would be the
object of considerable anger. Society as a whole
would doubtless express its collective anger in the
form of a lethal injection.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
21 Feb 2005 10:30:10 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvdtsr$ae3$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <PyuSd.14520$uc.9766@trnddc09> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:1puSd.7975$x53.7369@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again
will I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ]
every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Ok, which is it; do you not believe in God?
Or are you simply ***** at Him?
I'd settle for "*****". A human father who shot
all but a couple of his kids, then torched the house --
all because the kids were disobedient -- would be the
object of considerable anger. Society as a whole
would doubtless express its collective anger in the
form of a lethal injection.
And indeed, if that's what the story was....but....
God is supposed to be the creator of everything, right? There is also
supposed to be an afterlife, right? If there is one, God knows about it.
Therefore, FOR HIM, this isn't murder. It's moving day.
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his house and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DaveJr" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 12:16:20 AM |
|
|
"DianaC" <> >> >
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never
again
will I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ]
every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will
I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Ok, which is it; do you not believe in God?
Or are you simply ***** at Him?
I'd settle for "*****". A human father who shot
all but a couple of his kids, then torched the house --
all because the kids were disobedient -- would be the
object of considerable anger. Society as a whole
would doubtless express its collective anger in the
form of a lethal injection.
And indeed, if that's what the story was....but....
God is supposed to be the creator of everything, right? There is also
supposed to be an afterlife, right? If there is one, God knows about it.
Therefore, FOR HIM, this isn't murder. It's moving day.
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are
going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his house
and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
No matter how you slice it....it's still BS.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 08:49:14 AM |
|
|
"DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:58ASd.434$0X4.4016@news.uswest.net...
"DianaC" <> >> >
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never
again
will I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ]
every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again
will
I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Ok, which is it; do you not believe in God?
Or are you simply ***** at Him?
I'd settle for "*****". A human father who shot
all but a couple of his kids, then torched the house --
all because the kids were disobedient -- would be the
object of considerable anger. Society as a whole
would doubtless express its collective anger in the
form of a lethal injection.
And indeed, if that's what the story was....but....
God is supposed to be the creator of everything, right? There is also
supposed to be an afterlife, right? If there is one, God knows about it.
Therefore, FOR HIM, this isn't murder. It's moving day.
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are
going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his house
and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
No matter how you slice it....it's still BS.
I'm not adressing whether it's BS or not. Just attempting to be fair. If you
are going to criticise theism with a view to changing theist's minds, then
you have to address what they really believe, not some construct YOU make
up.
Of course, if it's all just an old boy's club where you can gripe to each
other about how awful everybody else is, whether your gripes have any
validity or not, then never mind.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 09:34:35 AM |
|
|
In article <mzySd.32775$uc.11456@trnddc08> "DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvdtsr$ae3$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <PyuSd.14520$uc.9766@trnddc09> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:1puSd.7975$x53.7369@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again
will I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ]
every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Ok, which is it; do you not believe in God?
Or are you simply ***** at Him?
I'd settle for "*****". A human father who shot
all but a couple of his kids, then torched the house --
all because the kids were disobedient -- would be the
object of considerable anger. Society as a whole
would doubtless express its collective anger in the
form of a lethal injection.
And indeed, if that's what the story was....but....
God is supposed to be the creator of everything, right? There is also
supposed to be an afterlife, right? If there is one, God knows about it.
Therefore, FOR HIM, this isn't murder. It's moving day.
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his house and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
Why then, if there's an afterlife, then it's no worse when
our hypothetical human father shoots all his kids than when God
offs a hundred thousand or so with, say, a tsunami (leaving,
of course, tens of thousands of orphans behind in your
"first house")
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 12:20:16 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvfjeb$nk0$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <mzySd.32775$uc.11456@trnddc08> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
<snip to>
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are
going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his house
and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
Why then, if there's an afterlife, then it's no worse when
our hypothetical human father shoots all his kids than when God
offs a hundred thousand or so with, say, a tsunami (leaving,
of course, tens of thousands of orphans behind in your
"first house")
No, it is worse. Remember, deity KNOWS about the afterlife. He created it,
supposedly. If the story about deity is true, then He would have no doubts
about where the people go, or THAT they will go there. The father in your
story doesn't know. He may have faith, but he doesn't KNOW. Therefore, if
there is the slightest chance he could be wrong, then his act is murder. No
person alive KNOWS whether or not there is an afterlife until he actually
gets there. Or not.
Even you.
Just like no man KNOWS whether a bridge will hold him up until it actually
does.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 12:49:38 PM |
|
|
In article <AJKSd.45073$wc.10104@trnddc07> "DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvfjeb$nk0$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <mzySd.32775$uc.11456@trnddc08> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
<snip to>
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are
going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his house
and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
Why then, if there's an afterlife, then it's no worse when
our hypothetical human father shoots all his kids than when God
offs a hundred thousand or so with, say, a tsunami (leaving,
of course, tens of thousands of orphans behind in your
"first house")
No, it is worse. Remember, deity KNOWS about the afterlife. He created it,
supposedly. If the story about deity is true, then He would have no doubts
about where the people go, or THAT they will go there. The father in your
story doesn't know. He may have faith, but he doesn't KNOW. Therefore, if
there is the slightest chance he could be wrong, then his act is murder. No
person alive KNOWS whether or not there is an afterlife until he actually
gets there. Or not.
Of course our murderous earthly father has sent no child to eternal
torment. That's entirely God's doing.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 02:09:25 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvfus2$p2g$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <AJKSd.45073$wc.10104@trnddc07> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvfjeb$nk0$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <mzySd.32775$uc.11456@trnddc08> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
<snip to>
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are
going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would
be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his
house
and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
Why then, if there's an afterlife, then it's no worse when
our hypothetical human father shoots all his kids than when God
offs a hundred thousand or so with, say, a tsunami (leaving,
of course, tens of thousands of orphans behind in your
"first house")
No, it is worse. Remember, deity KNOWS about the afterlife. He created
it,
supposedly. If the story about deity is true, then He would have no
doubts
about where the people go, or THAT they will go there. The father in your
story doesn't know. He may have faith, but he doesn't KNOW. Therefore, if
there is the slightest chance he could be wrong, then his act is murder.
No
person alive KNOWS whether or not there is an afterlife until he actually
gets there. Or not.
Of course our murderous earthly father has sent no child to eternal
torment. That's entirely God's doing.
Which god? The one I believe in doesn't do that, so railing against one that
does doesn't affect me, does it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 02:34:09 PM |
|
|
In article <VjMSd.36499$uc.33470@trnddc08> "DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvfus2$p2g$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <AJKSd.45073$wc.10104@trnddc07> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvfjeb$nk0$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <mzySd.32775$uc.11456@trnddc08> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
<snip to>
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are
going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would
be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his
house
and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
Why then, if there's an afterlife, then it's no worse when
our hypothetical human father shoots all his kids than when God
offs a hundred thousand or so with, say, a tsunami (leaving,
of course, tens of thousands of orphans behind in your
"first house")
No, it is worse. Remember, deity KNOWS about the afterlife. He created
it,
supposedly. If the story about deity is true, then He would have no
doubts
about where the people go, or THAT they will go there. The father in your
story doesn't know. He may have faith, but he doesn't KNOW. Therefore, if
there is the slightest chance he could be wrong, then his act is murder.
No
person alive KNOWS whether or not there is an afterlife until he actually
gets there. Or not.
Of course our murderous earthly father has sent no child to eternal
torment. That's entirely God's doing.
Which god? The one I believe in doesn't do that, so railing against one that
does doesn't affect me, does it?
No hell in your religion. Well, that is indeed a step in the
right direction.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
22 Feb 2005 05:18:10 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvg501$aac$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <VjMSd.36499$uc.33470@trnddc08> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
<snip to>
No hell in your religion. Well, that is indeed a step in the
right direction.
Oh, we believe in a hell, but it's not a place of eternal physical torment.
Most simply put, it's a place where God isn't, it takes some real doing to
qualify and you won't find innocent children there. Oh. All children are
innocent.
That about covers it, I think.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
23 Feb 2005 12:40:10 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:30:10 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cvdtsr$ae3$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <PyuSd.14520$uc.9766@trnddc09> "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> writes:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:1puSd.7975$x53.7369@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
GOD ADMITS HE KILLS PEOPLE
Genesis Chapter 8, verse 21:
The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again
will I curse the ground because of man, even though [ Or man, for ]
every
inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I
destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Ok, which is it; do you not believe in God?
Or are you simply ***** at Him?
I'd settle for "*****". A human father who shot
all but a couple of his kids, then torched the house --
all because the kids were disobedient -- would be the
object of considerable anger. Society as a whole
would doubtless express its collective anger in the
form of a lethal injection.
And indeed, if that's what the story was....but....
God is supposed to be the creator of everything, right? There is also
supposed to be an afterlife, right? If there is one, God knows about it.
Therefore, FOR HIM, this isn't murder. It's moving day.
The father you are talking about? Yeah, that's murder. But if you are going
to make an analogy that is similar to the position God is in, it would be
more like, well, the landlord forcibly removing a family from his house and
delivering them to another house. (shrug)
You really have to take the story in it's own context, not yours.
In its own context, despite what god might or might not feel or what
his perspective might be, people suffer a great deal when they are
being drowned, burned, stabbed etc. Once again, in its own context,
this god is killing all of these people in very painful ways in order
to move them for all eternity to another place where they will be
subjected to a great deal of pain for all eternity. There is nothing
out of context about the above. It is what the Bible tells us. Your
excuses are what are out of context. (shrug)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: god admits he kills people |
21 Feb 2005 06:37:29 PM |
|
|
Society as a whole would doubtless express its collective anger in the form
of a lethal injection.
why do you think that?, get real, a lot of society worships someone that
MURDERED every living thing on this planet.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|