God and the flood



 Religions > Atheism > God and the flood

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "lw8112"
Date: 02 Oct 2006 01:22:35 PM
Object: God and the flood
We all know about Noah and the flood. What I cannot understand is why
it was necessary. The beginning of the problem was with the sons of God
and they were supposedly angels. God should surely have the ability to
control his own angels or have they also free will? If they have it why
should we trust in something an angel says more than if they were
human. After all in such a case what hinders them from to lie.
.

User: "Bill M"

Title: Re: God and the flood 02 Oct 2006 01:26:43 PM
"lw8112" <torgnywickman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159795354.977223.282350@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

We all know about Noah and the flood. What I cannot understand is why
it was necessary. The beginning of the problem was with the sons of God
and they were supposedly angels. God should surely have the ability to
control his own angels or have they also free will? If they have it why
should we trust in something an angel says more than if they were
human. After all in such a case what hinders them from to lie.

Noah and the Ark
The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God
The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.
1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come CLOSE to
housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on earth. And
this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago. There are 1.7
million KNOWN species of animals on this planet. This story is patently
impossible, using only materials and tools available to Noah, to build an
arch large enough to hold all these creatures, together with suitable
environments for each of them to live in, keeping them all separated so they
don't kill and eat each other. And then provide room and an environment for
many hundreds of millions of known species of insects, plants, molds etc. on
this planet?
2. In order to capture two (or seven) of each animal in the world, Noah
would have to travel the whole world and capture them. This is an
impossibility even with modern means of travel and transport much less
ancient ravel on foot and by donkey!
3. Where did they house all of the new born during this ten month
escapade?
4. In addition, the ship would have to carry a TEN MONTHS supply of food
and fresh water for the people and thousands of animals for them to survive.
What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would have gone
extinct. How did they dispose of the thousands of tons of feces? It must
have been one stinking ship!
5. Now according to the Bible the earth was flooded for ten months. This
would kill off all the vegetation. What did the animals eat for an
additional year or more after the flood subsided?
6. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11.
7. And according to this myth, Noah was also over 600 years old!
This is a grossly implausible tale that ranks as a greater tale than Santa
Claus, The Wizard of Oz, The Easter Bunny and The Tooth Fairy!
Genesis 6:6
6 The LORD was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was
filled with pain.
7 So the LORD said, "I will wipe mankind, whom I have created, from the face
of the earth: men and animals, and creatures that move along the ground, and
birds of the air-for I am grieved that I have made them."
9 Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he
walked with God.
Genesis 7
1- The LORD then said to Noah, "Go into the ark, you and your whole family,
because I have found you righteous in this generation. 2 -Take with you
seven [a] of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and two of
every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, 3 - and also seven of
every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive
throughout the earth. 4 - Seven days from now I will send rain on the earth
for forty days and forty nights, and I will wipe from the face of the earth
every living creature I have made."
6 - Noah was six hundred years old when the floodwaters came on the earth.
7 - And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons' wives entered the ark
to escape the waters of the flood. 8 - Pairs of clean and unclean animals,
of birds and of all creatures that move along the ground, 9 - male and
female, came to Noah and entered the ark, as God had commanded Noah. 10 -
And after the seven days the floodwaters came on the earth.
This is patently ridiculous and impossible. How could they capture and load
over three million animals in a period of seven days???
11 - In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the
second month-on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and
the floodgates of the heavens were opened. 12 - And rain fell on the earth
forty days and forty nights.
13 - On that very day Noah and his sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth, together
with his wife and the wives of his three sons, entered the ark. 14 - They
had with them every wild animal according to its kind, all livestock
according to their kinds, every creature that moves along the ground
according to its kind and every bird according to its kind, everything with
wings. 15 - Pairs of all creatures that have the breath of life in them came
to Noah and entered the ark. 16 -The animals going in were male and female
of every living thing, as God had commanded Noah. Then the LORD shut him in.
17 - For forty days the flood kept coming on the earth, and as the waters
increased they lifted the ark high above the earth. 18 -The waters rose and
increased greatly on the earth, and the ark floated on the surface of the
water. 19 - They rose greatly on the earth, and all the high mountains under
the entire heavens were covered. 20 The waters rose and covered the
mountains to a depth of more than twenty feet. [, 21 - Every living thing
that moved on the earth perished-birds, livestock, wild animals, all the
creatures that swarm over the earth, and all mankind. 22 - Everything on dry
land that had the breath of life in its nostrils died. 23 -Every living
thing on the face of the earth was wiped out; men and animals and the
creatures that move along the ground and the birds of the air were wiped
from the earth. Only Noah was left, and those with him in the ark.
24 - The waters flooded the earth for a hundred and fifty days.
This of course would have also killed all the vegetation on Earth!
Genesis 7:6 (New International Version)
6 Noah was "six hundred" years old when the floodwaters came on the earth.
7 -And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons' wives entered the ark to
escape the waters of the flood
Genesis 8
1 - But God remembered Noah and all the wild animals and the livestock that
were with him in the ark, and he sent a wind over the earth, and the waters
receded.
3 - The water receded steadily from the earth. At the end of the hundred and
fifty days the water had gone down,
4 - and on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on
the mountains of Ararat.
5 -The waters continued to recede until the tenth month, and on the first
day of the tenth month the tops of the mountains became visible
And what did they eat until all the vegetation recovered from the flood???
Genesis 9 God's Covenant with Noah
1 -Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, "Be fruitful and
increase in number and fill the earth.
2 -The fear and dread of you will fall upon all the beasts of the earth and
all the birds of the air, upon every creature that moves along the ground,
and upon all the fish of the sea; they are given into your hands.
3 Everything that lives and moves will be food for you. Just as I gave you
the green plants, I now give you everything.
4 - "But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it.
5 - And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand
an accounting from every animal. And from each man, too, I will demand an
accounting for the life of his fellow man.
Before man learned how to create a fire, he had no choice but to eat raw
meat!
.
User: "lw8112"

Title: Re: God and the flood 02 Oct 2006 02:12:17 PM
Bill M skrev:

"lw8112" <torgnywickman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159795354.977223.282350@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

We all know about Noah and the flood. What I cannot understand is why
it was necessary. The beginning of the problem was with the sons of God
and they were supposedly angels. God should surely have the ability to
control his own angels or have they also free will? If they have it why
should we trust in something an angel says more than if they were
human. After all in such a case what hinders them from to lie.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

I agree, but english isn't my first language and I forget to tell that
I expressed myself hypotethtically. My post was about a contradiction
in the tale not the real Flood who of course never happened. I'm aware
of the other contrdictions in the tale. I'm only unused to post on
Internet. Next time I will try to myself more clear.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come CLOSE to
housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on earth. And
this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago. There are 1.7
million KNOWN species of animals on this planet. This story is patently
impossible, using only materials and tools available to Noah, to build an
arch large enough to hold all these creatures, together with suitable
environments for each of them to live in, keeping them all separated so they
don't kill and eat each other. And then provide room and an environment for
many hundreds of millions of known species of insects, plants, molds etc. on
this planet?
2. In order to capture two (or seven) of each animal in the world, Noah
would have to travel the whole world and capture them. This is an
impossibility even with modern means of travel and transport much less
ancient ravel on foot and by donkey!

3. Where did they house all of the new born during this ten month
escapade?

4. In addition, the ship would have to carry a TEN MONTHS supply of food
and fresh water for the people and thousands of animals for them to survive.
What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would have gone
extinct. How did they dispose of the thousands of tons of feces? It must
have been one stinking ship!

5. Now according to the Bible the earth was flooded for ten months. This
would kill off all the vegetation. What did the animals eat for an
additional year or more after the flood subsided?

6. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11.

7. And according to this myth, Noah was also over 600 years old!

This is a grossly implausible tale that ranks as a greater tale than Santa
Claus, The Wizard of Oz, The Easter Bunny and The Tooth Fairy!

Genesis 6:6

6 The LORD was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was
filled with pain.

7 So the LORD said, "I will wipe mankind, whom I have created, from the face
of the earth: men and animals, and creatures that move along the ground, and
birds of the air-for I am grieved that I have made them."

9 Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he
walked with God.

Genesis 7

1- The LORD then said to Noah, "Go into the ark, you and your whole family,
because I have found you righteous in this generation. 2 -Take with you
seven [a] of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and two of
every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, 3 - and also seven of
every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive
throughout the earth. 4 - Seven days from now I will send rain on the earth
for forty days and forty nights, and I will wipe from the face of the earth
every living creature I have made."

6 - Noah was six hundred years old when the floodwaters came on the earth.
7 - And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons' wives entered the ark
to escape the waters of the flood. 8 - Pairs of clean and unclean animals,
of birds and of all creatures that move along the ground, 9 - male and
female, came to Noah and entered the ark, as God had commanded Noah. 10 -
And after the seven days the floodwaters came on the earth.



This is patently ridiculous and impossible. How could they capture and load
over three million animals in a period of seven days???



11 - In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the
second month-on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and
the floodgates of the heavens were opened. 12 - And rain fell on the earth
forty days and forty nights.

13 - On that very day Noah and his sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth, together
with his wife and the wives of his three sons, entered the ark. 14 - They
had with them every wild animal according to its kind, all livestock
according to their kinds, every creature that moves along the ground
according to its kind and every bird according to its kind, everything with
wings. 15 - Pairs of all creatures that have the breath of life in them came
to Noah and entered the ark. 16 -The animals going in were male and female
of every living thing, as God had commanded Noah. Then the LORD shut him in.

17 - For forty days the flood kept coming on the earth, and as the waters
increased they lifted the ark high above the earth. 18 -The waters rose and
increased greatly on the earth, and the ark floated on the surface of the
water. 19 - They rose greatly on the earth, and all the high mountains under
the entire heavens were covered. 20 The waters rose and covered the
mountains to a depth of more than twenty feet. [, 21 - Every living thing
that moved on the earth perished-birds, livestock, wild animals, all the
creatures that swarm over the earth, and all mankind. 22 - Everything on dry
land that had the breath of life in its nostrils died. 23 -Every living
thing on the face of the earth was wiped out; men and animals and the
creatures that move along the ground and the birds of the air were wiped
from the earth. Only Noah was left, and those with him in the ark.

24 - The waters flooded the earth for a hundred and fifty days.

This of course would have also killed all the vegetation on Earth!



Genesis 7:6 (New International Version)

6 Noah was "six hundred" years old when the floodwaters came on the earth.

7 -And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons' wives entered the ark to
escape the waters of the flood

Genesis 8

1 - But God remembered Noah and all the wild animals and the livestock that
were with him in the ark, and he sent a wind over the earth, and the waters
receded.

3 - The water receded steadily from the earth. At the end of the hundred and
fifty days the water had gone down,

4 - and on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on
the mountains of Ararat.

5 -The waters continued to recede until the tenth month, and on the first
day of the tenth month the tops of the mountains became visible



And what did they eat until all the vegetation recovered from the flood???

Genesis 9 God's Covenant with Noah

1 -Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, "Be fruitful and
increase in number and fill the earth.

2 -The fear and dread of you will fall upon all the beasts of the earth and
all the birds of the air, upon every creature that moves along the ground,
and upon all the fish of the sea; they are given into your hands.

3 Everything that lives and moves will be food for you. Just as I gave you
the green plants, I now give you everything.

4 - "But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it.

5 - And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand
an accounting from every animal. And from each man, too, I will demand an
accounting for the life of his fellow man.



Before man learned how to create a fire, he had no choice but to eat raw
meat!

.


User: "stoney"

Title: Re: God and the flood 07 Oct 2006 10:35:38 PM
On 2 Oct 2006 06:22:35 -0700, "lw8112" <torgnywickman@hotmail.com> wrote
in alt.atheism

We all know about Noah and the flood. What I cannot understand is why
it was necessary.

It not only wasn't necessary, it never happened.

The beginning of the problem was with the sons of God
and they were supposedly angels.

*Who* did 'God' have sex with to produce 'sons?'

God should surely have the ability to
control his own angels or have they also free will?

'Free Will' doesn't exist. With omniscience all are mere actors hitting
their marks and spouting their lines in a useless play scripted eons
before.

If they have it why
should we trust in something an angel says more than if they were
human. After all in such a case what hinders them from to lie.

Nothing hinders fictional items and entities other than their
nonexistance.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: God and the flood 02 Oct 2006 08:32:28 PM
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 06:22:35 -0700, lw8112 wrote:

We all know about Noah and the flood. What I cannot understand is why
it was necessary. The beginning of the problem was with the sons of God
and they were supposedly angels. God should surely have the ability to
control his own angels or have they also free will? If they have it why
should we trust in something an angel says more than if they were
human. After all in such a case what hinders them from to lie.

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which what we call "the
Old Testament" grew out of) had cultural contexts and the stories make
sense *in context but not *out. Such as the words (whatever they are)
translated as "sons of god." Somebody in the day when those stories were
told probably knew exactly what that meant. Now, who knows?
There is also that Christianity did not incorporate all of the Jewish
writings and stories that existed (and/or exist). Someone versed in the
Jewish scriptures, stories, and traditions may be able to better explain
what that story was actually about. Christianity took only part of the
writings and has re-interpreted them to suit modern theology. Such as they
claim Jesus was running around in OT times (they do, really, they point to
some unidentified beings that "accompanied" Yahweh on some of his walk
abouts on Earth and claim one was Jesus).
In short, we may never know what people thousands of years ago meant by
that story...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: God and the flood 02 Oct 2006 10:36:30 PM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:wHeUg.10674$6S3.7501@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 06:22:35 -0700, lw8112 wrote:

We all know about Noah and the flood. What I cannot understand is why
it was necessary.

It wasn't. Think about it: The world was so wicked, corrupt, and evil that
poor 'God' had enough and decided to 'cleanse' the earth of it.
The problem is that 'believers' are so brainwashed that they don't question
the 'facts' presented to them or take some biblical concepts to their
logical conclusions at times.
In the case of the earth being so 'foul' and filled with evil that it
neccessitated the murder of every single being on the planet other than
Noah, his family, and two (or seven) of every creature? Why? Why could 'God'
not wiggle his nose and 'suck up' all the evil on planet earth as one would
do with a vacuum cleaner? Why murder babies, toddlers, and pregnant women?
Are we to believe that it was completely *impossible* for any of the
helpless children to grow up to be 'good'? And what about the truly mentally
retarded people? (And NO, I'm not talking about right-wing evangelical
Christians here. There weren't any of them around at the time.) Why not
'murder' Satan? Once the descendents of Noah and his family re-populated the
earth, who do you think was nipping at their consciences and using his
supernaturally evil 'talent' to unfairly try and prod the the 'new' faithful
into performing evil acts? Does murdering mere mortals and allowing
supernatural evil to continue to exist make *any* sense to the theists
reading this? If so, send me a bottle of the same stuff you're drinking!
(Nix that!!! I no longer drink or smoke the 'funny' stuff -- for quite a
long spell now.)
The whole Jesus/God story is ridiculous from top to bottom. It's as bogus as
'bogus' gets. A 'God' who stands helpless to control his 'creation' is a
pathetic 'God' -- besides being an imaginary one.
Bring back the 'Golden Calf'. The (imaginary) 'God' we've been 'stuck' with
is a 'bird-brain'. And the believers in this artificial piece of crap -- are
worse!
Why did 'God' murder every single infant baby, toddler, pregnant woman,
every mentally ill person? He didn't. There was no 'Noah's Flood', and there
is no 'God'. I'm glad to report that scientists have confirmed the former
and that a *total* lack of 'evidence' cinches the latter.
Greywolf
<politely snipped>
.

User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: God and the flood 02 Oct 2006 09:33:23 PM
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which
what we call "the Old Testament" grew out of) had
cultural contexts and the stories make sense *in
context but not *out.

That's true. But, depending on the story (Noah &
Abraham, for example), they had to have made
the switch from oral to written at least a thousand
years before the bible existed.
There were cultures that relied on an oral tradition.
The most obvious example is the Celts, who appear
to have devalued the written word as much as, say,
Egypt valued it.
Anyhow, there were cultures that relied on an oral
tradition, and the culture described in the bible (or,
if you prefer, the culture that produced the bible) is
not one of them.
.
User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 04:26:51 PM
On 2 Oct 2006 14:33:23 -0700, in alt.atheism , "JTEM"
<jtem01@gmail.com> in
<1159824803.757518.261810@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> wrote:


Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which
what we call "the Old Testament" grew out of) had
cultural contexts and the stories make sense *in
context but not *out.


That's true. But, depending on the story (Noah &
Abraham, for example), they had to have made
the switch from oral to written at least a thousand
years before the bible existed.

There were cultures that relied on an oral tradition.
The most obvious example is the Celts, who appear
to have devalued the written word as much as, say,
Egypt valued it.

Anyhow, there were cultures that relied on an oral
tradition, and the culture described in the bible (or,
if you prefer, the culture that produced the bible) is
not one of them.

There is an extensive oral tradition relating to the Torah, a
tradition that long pre-dates Christianity.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 01:19:39 AM
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:33:23 -0700, JTEM wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which
what we call "the Old Testament" grew out of) had
cultural contexts and the stories make sense *in
context but not *out.


That's true. But, depending on the story (Noah &
Abraham, for example), they had to have made
the switch from oral to written at least a thousand
years before the bible existed.

There were cultures that relied on an oral tradition.
The most obvious example is the Celts, who appear
to have devalued the written word as much as, say,
Egypt valued it.

Anyhow, there were cultures that relied on an oral
tradition, and the culture described in the bible (or,
if you prefer, the culture that produced the bible) is
not one of them.

Maybe I didn't express myself all that well. The written tradition was
based on an oral tradition. The ancient Hebrew were tribal and had oral
traditions before they shifted--and over a long period of time--to a
written tradition. Initially, it would have been that the stories were
important and needed to be recorded. Over time, a priest class would have
been consolidating, codifying, redacting, and elevating the written
tradition over the oral. I think the constant conflicts over "other
gods" in the OT writings show aspects of that shift. People with multiple,
oral traditions resisting being forced into a single, written tradition
controlled by the priest class.
In any case, the early stories of the OT show a lot of the hallmarks of an
oral tradition being written down. They're very sparse and assume a great
deal of cultural knowledge. Nobody at the time thinking "if we don't
explain everything in detail, our descendants centuries from now when the
written tradition is consolidated won't know what we meant."
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
User: ""

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 02:04:26 AM
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:33:23 -0700, JTEM wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which
what we call "the Old Testament" grew out of) had
cultural contexts and the stories make sense *in
context but not *out.


That's true. But, depending on the story (Noah &
Abraham, for example), they had to have made
the switch from oral to written at least a thousand
years before the bible existed.

There were cultures that relied on an oral tradition.
The most obvious example is the Celts, who appear
to have devalued the written word as much as, say,
Egypt valued it.

Anyhow, there were cultures that relied on an oral
tradition, and the culture described in the bible (or,
if you prefer, the culture that produced the bible) is
not one of them.


Maybe I didn't express myself all that well. The written tradition was
based on an oral tradition. The ancient Hebrew were tribal and had oral
traditions before they shifted--and over a long period of time--to a
written tradition. Initially, it would have been that the stories were
important and needed to be recorded. Over time, a priest class would have
been consolidating, codifying, redacting, and elevating the written
tradition over the oral. I think the constant conflicts over "other
gods" in the OT writings show aspects of that shift. People with multiple,
oral traditions resisting being forced into a single, written tradition
controlled by the priest class.

In any case, the early stories of the OT show a lot of the hallmarks of an
oral tradition being written down. They're very sparse and assume a great
deal of cultural knowledge. Nobody at the time thinking "if we don't
explain everything in detail, our descendants centuries from now when the
written tradition is consolidated won't know what we meant."

It is of interest that the Jewish scribes were very meticulous
about the hand -coping of their manuacripts -
even one small error on a page meant the whole page had to be
rewritten.
About Noah and the Flood the following website gives a lot of
information
from Creation Scientists.
Noah's Ark Q and A
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3027/
Gladys Swager
.
User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 02:17:59 AM
wrote in news:1159841066.437048.101110
@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Creation Scientists

Whatare those?
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA

.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 06:24:24 AM
"Enkidu" <ox_qljjor@trashmail.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9850C4546F527255229@130.133.1.4...

swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in news:1159841066.437048.101110
@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Creation Scientists


Whatare those?

--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA


They were the forerunners to the ID'ers. You know, those people who lie and
say that the concept of ID has *nothing* to do with religion but is based on
pure 'logic' and 'science'.
Where is the 'science' in Creation Science? Why it's as non-existent as
'God' is. And that's *pretty* non-existent.
Greywolf
.

User: "stoney"

Title: Re: God and the flood 07 Oct 2006 10:50:44 PM
On 3 Oct 2006 02:17:59 GMT, Enkidu <ox_qljjor@trashmail.net> wrote in
alt.atheism

swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in news:1159841066.437048.101110
@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Creation Scientists


What are those?

Squared circles.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 05:25:31 AM
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:17:59 +0000, Enkidu wrote:

swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in news:1159841066.437048.101110
@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Creation Scientists


Whatare those?

Walking oxymorons...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.


User: "stoney"

Title: Re: God and the flood 07 Oct 2006 10:49:46 PM
On 2 Oct 2006 19:04:26 -0700,
wrote in alt.atheism


Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:33:23 -0700, JTEM wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which
what we call "the Old Testament" grew out of) had
cultural contexts and the stories make sense *in
context but not *out.


That's true. But, depending on the story (Noah &
Abraham, for example), they had to have made
the switch from oral to written at least a thousand
years before the bible existed.

There were cultures that relied on an oral tradition.
The most obvious example is the Celts, who appear
to have devalued the written word as much as, say,
Egypt valued it.

Anyhow, there were cultures that relied on an oral
tradition, and the culture described in the bible (or,
if you prefer, the culture that produced the bible) is
not one of them.


Maybe I didn't express myself all that well. The written tradition was
based on an oral tradition. The ancient Hebrew were tribal and had oral
traditions before they shifted--and over a long period of time--to a
written tradition. Initially, it would have been that the stories were
important and needed to be recorded. Over time, a priest class would have
been consolidating, codifying, redacting, and elevating the written
tradition over the oral. I think the constant conflicts over "other
gods" in the OT writings show aspects of that shift. People with multiple,
oral traditions resisting being forced into a single, written tradition
controlled by the priest class.

In any case, the early stories of the OT show a lot of the hallmarks of an
oral tradition being written down. They're very sparse and assume a great
deal of cultural knowledge. Nobody at the time thinking "if we don't
explain everything in detail, our descendants centuries from now when the
written tradition is consolidated won't know what we meant."

It is of interest that the Jewish scribes were very meticulous
about the hand -coping of their manuacripts -
even one small error on a page meant the whole page had to be
rewritten.

About Noah and the Flood the following website gives a lot of
information
from Creation Scientists.

Noah and the Flood never happened and 'Creation Scientists' is an
oxymoron.
[]
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.

User: "Free Lunch"

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 02:17:05 AM
On 2 Oct 2006 19:04:26 -0700, in alt.atheism
swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in
<1159841066.437048.101110@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:


Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:33:23 -0700, JTEM wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which
what we call "the Old Testament" grew out of) had
cultural contexts and the stories make sense *in
context but not *out.


That's true. But, depending on the story (Noah &
Abraham, for example), they had to have made
the switch from oral to written at least a thousand
years before the bible existed.

There were cultures that relied on an oral tradition.
The most obvious example is the Celts, who appear
to have devalued the written word as much as, say,
Egypt valued it.

Anyhow, there were cultures that relied on an oral
tradition, and the culture described in the bible (or,
if you prefer, the culture that produced the bible) is
not one of them.


Maybe I didn't express myself all that well. The written tradition was
based on an oral tradition. The ancient Hebrew were tribal and had oral
traditions before they shifted--and over a long period of time--to a
written tradition. Initially, it would have been that the stories were
important and needed to be recorded. Over time, a priest class would have
been consolidating, codifying, redacting, and elevating the written
tradition over the oral. I think the constant conflicts over "other
gods" in the OT writings show aspects of that shift. People with multiple,
oral traditions resisting being forced into a single, written tradition
controlled by the priest class.

In any case, the early stories of the OT show a lot of the hallmarks of an
oral tradition being written down. They're very sparse and assume a great
deal of cultural knowledge. Nobody at the time thinking "if we don't
explain everything in detail, our descendants centuries from now when the
written tradition is consolidated won't know what we meant."

It is of interest that the Jewish scribes were very meticulous
about the hand -coping of their manuacripts -
even one small error on a page meant the whole page had to be
rewritten.

About Noah and the Flood the following website gives a lot of
information
from Creation Scientists.

Noah's Ark Q and A
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3027/

Gladys Swager

Sorry Gladys, there was no global flood. Your 'friends' at
creationontheweb are liarsontheweb. Get used to it. Religious folks are
commonly conned by their 'leaders'.
Have you read _Elmer Gantry_? It does a wonderful job of explaining how
these people work. They don't care about you. They don't care about
science. They lie.
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 05:24:38 AM
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:17:05 -0500, Free Lunch wrote:

On 2 Oct 2006 19:04:26 -0700, in alt.atheism
swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in
<1159841066.437048.101110@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:


Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:33:23 -0700, JTEM wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which
what we call "the Old Testament" grew out of) had
cultural contexts and the stories make sense *in
context but not *out.


That's true. But, depending on the story (Noah &
Abraham, for example), they had to have made
the switch from oral to written at least a thousand
years before the bible existed.

There were cultures that relied on an oral tradition.
The most obvious example is the Celts, who appear
to have devalued the written word as much as, say,
Egypt valued it.

Anyhow, there were cultures that relied on an oral
tradition, and the culture described in the bible (or,
if you prefer, the culture that produced the bible) is
not one of them.


Maybe I didn't express myself all that well. The written tradition was
based on an oral tradition. The ancient Hebrew were tribal and had oral
traditions before they shifted--and over a long period of time--to a
written tradition. Initially, it would have been that the stories were
important and needed to be recorded. Over time, a priest class would have
been consolidating, codifying, redacting, and elevating the written
tradition over the oral. I think the constant conflicts over "other
gods" in the OT writings show aspects of that shift. People with multiple,
oral traditions resisting being forced into a single, written tradition
controlled by the priest class.

In any case, the early stories of the OT show a lot of the hallmarks of an
oral tradition being written down. They're very sparse and assume a great
deal of cultural knowledge. Nobody at the time thinking "if we don't
explain everything in detail, our descendants centuries from now when the
written tradition is consolidated won't know what we meant."

It is of interest that the Jewish scribes were very meticulous
about the hand -coping of their manuacripts -
even one small error on a page meant the whole page had to be
rewritten.

About Noah and the Flood the following website gives a lot of
information
from Creation Scientists.

Noah's Ark Q and A
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3027/

Gladys Swager


Sorry Gladys, there was no global flood. Your 'friends' at
creationontheweb are liarsontheweb. Get used to it. Religious folks are
commonly conned by their 'leaders'.

Have you read _Elmer Gantry_? It does a wonderful job of explaining how
these people work. They don't care about you. They don't care about
science. They lie.

And by their actions when their lies are exposed, they *know* they're
lying...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.


User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: God and the flood 03 Oct 2006 05:23:46 AM
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:04:26 -0700, swager wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:33:23 -0700, JTEM wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

One part of the problem is that oral traditions (which
what we call "the Old Testament" grew out of) had
cultural contexts and the stories make sense *in
context but not *out.


That's true. But, depending on the story (Noah &
Abraham, for example), they had to have made
the switch from oral to written at least a thousand
years before the bible existed.

There were cultures that relied on an oral tradition.
The most obvious example is the Celts, who appear
to have devalued the written word as much as, say,
Egypt valued it.

Anyhow, there were cultures that relied on an oral
tradition, and the culture described in the bible (or,
if you prefer, the culture that produced the bible) is
not one of them.


Maybe I didn't express myself all that well. The written tradition was
based on an oral tradition. The ancient Hebrew were tribal and had oral
traditions before they shifted--and over a long period of time--to a
written tradition. Initially, it would have been that the stories were
important and needed to be recorded. Over time, a priest class would have
been consolidating, codifying, redacting, and elevating the written
tradition over the oral. I think the constant conflicts over "other
gods" in the OT writings show aspects of that shift. People with multiple,
oral traditions resisting being forced into a single, written tradition
controlled by the priest class.

In any case, the early stories of the OT show a lot of the hallmarks of an
oral tradition being written down. They're very sparse and assume a great
deal of cultural knowledge. Nobody at the time thinking "if we don't
explain everything in detail, our descendants centuries from now when the
written tradition is consolidated won't know what we meant."

It is of interest that the Jewish scribes were very meticulous
about the hand -coping of their manuacripts -
even one small error on a page meant the whole page had to be
rewritten.

So? Accurately recording a tale does not automatically record the cultural
context of that tale.

About Noah and the Flood the following website gives a lot of
information
from Creation Scientists.

Noah's Ark Q and A
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3027/

Gladys Swager

You *have* to be trying to be funny citing a creationist website in
alt.atheism...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER