| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Kate" |
| Date: |
21 Oct 2006 06:41:03 PM |
| Object: |
God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
There is a misconception among Atheists and some Christians God is not
Omni-benevolent as in all good and mercieful. I'll clearly accept the
OT accounts and the Revelation as evidence to this God shows mercy ONLY
to those He deems worthy and who accept Him as their Lord. Being bathed
in the redeeming blood of Jesus His beloved Son that sacrificed His
life for mankinds sin will wash away our evil. To those that could not
know the Law of God such as pagans unaware of the Judeo-Christian
concepts and later of jesus they will be judged fairly according to the
Natural Light of Understanding in the conscience of men. Their works
and deeds tempered by Gods mercy will be the weight of their Judgement.
But to others God is the Final Judge and often poured out His wrath on
humanity through use of His power directly (10 Plagues of Egypt),
through actions of His servants on Earth or through nature. He may test
us with trials such as Job or by allowing bad things to happen to the
Christian. But the world is better off right now His hand is held back
as God protects His people by restraining His wrath. In the Revelation
after the Anti-Christ is revealed God will lift His protection and
Satan will be allowed to work then God will unleash the Final
Judgements upon all the world. Does that sound like a benevolent God?
It doesn't to me either so God is not all benevolent.
But God is God and as the creator of all we only must worship Him and
honor Him, we serve God and God does not serve us. And for those too
proud to accept that then the wrath poured out upon your heads will be
earned by your treachery in failing to accept God as your Master.
As a Christian I don't set the morality to judge God. Rather God sets
the morality He demands we follow to the best of our ability His Law
and Commandments.
.
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
11 Dec 2006 07:48:36 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:58:19 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:33:29 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
That is a useful answer, but not for you. You claimed that there was
evidence. I asked you to provide it. You have now admitted that you have
no evidence. Why did you lie before?
No, I did not lie. I think I did provide you the way to find your
objective verifiable spiritual evidence.
You claimed it exists, so it's your burden to provide it, not our
burden to look for it.
Heck, I even gave you a
general idea about what they might be. I have tried everything I can
to help you.
Except provide evidence to back up a single assertion of yours.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"Damn. Looks like all of usenet agrees that you don't have the logical
faculties to prove the statement 'dogshit is not peanut butter' if we
gave you a jar of each and a box of crackers" - John Hattan to Tichy
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Brze" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
11 Dec 2006 08:04:52 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:48:36 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:58:19 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:33:29 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
That is a useful answer, but not for you. You claimed that there was
evidence. I asked you to provide it. You have now admitted that you have
no evidence. Why did you lie before?
No, I did not lie. I think I did provide you the way to find your
objective verifiable spiritual evidence.
You claimed it exists, so it's your burden to provide it, not our
burden to look for it.
That only works for physical evidence. It doesn't work that way when
it's about the spiritual evidence.
Heck, I even gave you a
general idea about what they might be. I have tried everything I can
to help you.
Except provide evidence to back up a single assertion of yours.
In the quest for the spiritual truth of God, we are free to share what
we have learned from the truth, but we are forbidden and incapable to
provide the evidence itself. It's always God himself who reveals his
truth to the chosen few personally. There is nothing I can do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
12 Dec 2006 07:22:42 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:04:52 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:48:36 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:58:19 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:33:29 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
That is a useful answer, but not for you. You claimed that there was
evidence. I asked you to provide it. You have now admitted that you have
no evidence. Why did you lie before?
No, I did not lie. I think I did provide you the way to find your
objective verifiable spiritual evidence.
You claimed it exists, so it's your burden to provide it, not our
burden to look for it.
That only works for physical evidence.
That's what we get for things that objectively exist.
It doesn't work that way when
it's about the spiritual evidence.
Not if "spiritual" means "in your mind".
Heck, I even gave you a
general idea about what they might be. I have tried everything I can
to help you.
Except provide evidence to back up a single assertion of yours.
In the quest for the spiritual truth of God, we are free to share what
we have learned from the truth, but we are forbidden and incapable to
provide the evidence itself.
So you're either deluded or lying. Your god is a figment of your
imagination.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"A myth is a fixed way of looking at the world which cannot be destroyed
because, looked at through the myth, all evidence supports the myth."
- Edward De Bono
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
11 Dec 2006 07:29:16 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:58:19 -0500, in alt.atheism
Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in
<s17qn2dmkimm41bbnhpahqih1uu8742jbu@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:33:29 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:12:26 -0500, in alt.atheism
Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in
<j0fpn2pma863madeklcc1tb9itrc2ks561@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:45:59 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:30:22 -0500, in alt.atheism
Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in
<ntcpn2l3pbuas5ahq4rttk6nhqaihi8gcl@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:18:57 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 04:59:14 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:50:26 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
BTW, hope one day you will meet him.
I've been to his house, but he hasn't been home in over 20 billion
years.
How unfortunate. You must have the wrong address.
It's the last address he allows us to visit - death.
Just as I thought. You got the wrong address. God's residence is life.
He hasn't been home at that address in over 20 billion years either.
At least he's consistent - consistently non-existent.
Yea, right. How do you know so much? For a person know both life and
death, it's rather unusual. Don't you think?
Feel free to offer evidence if you ever come across any.
I can't provide you anything. It's God who provides you His loving
kindness to wake you up.
That is a useful answer, but not for you. You claimed that there was
evidence. I asked you to provide it. You have now admitted that you have
no evidence. Why did you lie before?
No, I did not lie. I think I did provide you the way to find your
objective verifiable spiritual evidence. Heck, I even gave you a
general idea about what they might be. I have tried everything I can
to help you.
No, you asserted that you had evidence. I asked you to provide it. Now
you are making excuses.
You do not have evidence.
You know that.
You're just trying to rationalize your lies now.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Samuel W. Heywood" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
09 Dec 2006 07:12:40 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Eric Brze wrote:
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:31:56 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
<snip>
Actually, religion can be very useful. It collects the evil doers to
make sure they will all go to hell with the firm belief that they are
doing the will of God.
A serious problem with religion is that it sometimes inspires sadistic
sex perverts and serial killers such as the Rev. Cotton Mather (search)
to hunt down innocent women and to abuse and torture them, and then have
them suffer to be hanged by the neck until dead after they were done
with them. They committed those atrocities in the name of God under the
pretext that a community of Christian nutcases believed the innocent
women to be witches endowed with the power of the devil to cast evil
spells upon the upright and God-fearing righteous folks whom they
falsely claimed themselves to be.
It shelters the good people to make sure they
will all live in the love of Jesus Christ. It has got to be God's
great plan.
<snip>
Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Brze" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
10 Dec 2006 04:16:42 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 08:12:40 -0500, "Samuel W. Heywood"
<sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Eric Brze wrote:
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:31:56 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
<snip>
Actually, religion can be very useful. It collects the evil doers to
make sure they will all go to hell with the firm belief that they are
doing the will of God.
A serious problem with religion is that it sometimes inspires sadistic
sex perverts and serial killers such as the Rev. Cotton Mather (search)
to hunt down innocent women and to abuse and torture them, and then have
them suffer to be hanged by the neck until dead after they were done
with them. They committed those atrocities in the name of God under the
pretext that a community of Christian nutcases believed the innocent
women to be witches endowed with the power of the devil to cast evil
spells upon the upright and God-fearing righteous folks whom they
falsely claimed themselves to be.
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
It shelters the good people to make sure they
will all live in the love of Jesus Christ. It has got to be God's
great plan.
<snip>
Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
10 Dec 2006 12:23:06 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I don't try to imagine a God; it suffices to stand in awe of the structure of the world
insofar as it allows our inadequate senses to appreciate it."
- Letter to S. Flesch, April 16, 1954; Einstein Archive 30-1154
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Brze" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
10 Dec 2006 07:20:11 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
It's perfectly fine to stay in your willful ignorance, as long as you
have no interest in learning the Truth. Religion is to protect the
good people, but more importantly, religion is the best way for those
seekers of the Truth. Freedom and Salvation are not fancy dreams in
the after life. They are here and now, and they are real and fabulous!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
10 Dec 2006 10:16:14 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:20:11 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
It's perfectly fine to stay in your willful ignorance, as long as you
have no interest in learning the Truth.
Which is what I've been telling you for many years.
Religion is to protect the good people
No, religion is to "protect" the people running it - from having to
actually work for a living.
Freedom and Salvation are not fancy dreams
No, salvation is just something people made up to be able to control
other people.
in the after life.
There is no "after life". When you die, you're just dead.
They are here and now, and they are real and fabulous!
And they are a figment of your damaged brain.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Whence then comes evil?
-Epicurus, 3rd c. BCE
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Brze" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
11 Dec 2006 02:05:58 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:16:14 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:20:11 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
It's perfectly fine to stay in your willful ignorance, as long as you
have no interest in learning the Truth.
Which is what I've been telling you for many years.
Yes, I know. Ignorance is bliss. No argument about that.
Religion is to protect the good people
No, religion is to "protect" the people running it - from having to
actually work for a living.
Those are the thieves who have stolen God's religion from those true
servants.
Freedom and Salvation are not fancy dreams
No, salvation is just something people made up to be able to control
other people.
Fortunately, those people causing you to reach such conclusion know
nothing about the salvation.
in the after life.
There is no "after life". When you die, you're just dead.
Whatever. It doesn't matter anymore.
They are here and now, and they are real and fabulous!
And they are a figment of your damaged brain.
Nope. They are the reality of God - Heaven.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
10 Dec 2006 07:47:17 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:20:11 -0500, in alt.atheism
Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in
<2ibpn2188sacdq3rf99hjq8n9ijj3iep1f@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
It's perfectly fine to stay in your willful ignorance, as long as you
have no interest in learning the Truth. Religion is to protect the
good people, but more importantly, religion is the best way for those
seekers of the Truth. Freedom and Salvation are not fancy dreams in
the after life. They are here and now, and they are real and fabulous!
Really? If that were the case, you would be able to provide evidence to
support your claim.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Brze" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
10 Dec 2006 07:54:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:47:17 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:20:11 -0500, in alt.atheism
Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com> wrote in
<2ibpn2188sacdq3rf99hjq8n9ijj3iep1f@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
It's perfectly fine to stay in your willful ignorance, as long as you
have no interest in learning the Truth. Religion is to protect the
good people, but more importantly, religion is the best way for those
seekers of the Truth. Freedom and Salvation are not fancy dreams in
the after life. They are here and now, and they are real and fabulous!
Really? If that were the case, you would be able to provide evidence to
support your claim.
Sorry, can't do that. I'm just a lowly human. It's beyond my ability.
:-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
10 Dec 2006 10:16:51 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:54:25 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:47:17 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
Really? If that were the case, you would be able to provide evidence to
support your claim.
Sorry, can't do that. I'm just a lowly human. It's beyond my ability.
So you're just talking through the hole in your head.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their
numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion,
only His nonexistence could excuse Him."
-A. Einstein (Letter to Edgar Meyer, Jan. 2, 1915)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Brze" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
11 Dec 2006 01:49:25 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:16:51 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:54:25 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:47:17 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
Really? If that were the case, you would be able to provide evidence to
support your claim.
Sorry, can't do that. I'm just a lowly human. It's beyond my ability.
So you're just talking through the hole in your head.
Hm... Right.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
11 Dec 2006 03:45:27 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
11 Dec 2006 07:49:49 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but
not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings."
-A. Einstein (1929 -- Einstein Archive 33-272)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
11 Dec 2006 11:19:54 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
- Refer: <8l2sn2t67jq3gk2sm312hv0rgplbck471v@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
How much can a Koala bear?
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
16 Dec 2006 08:57:20 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:49:54 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
- Refer: <8l2sn2t67jq3gk2sm312hv0rgplbck471v@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
How much can a Koala bear?
Awwwww leaf it alone.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
16 Dec 2006 08:56:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
17 Dec 2006 02:44:56 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
21 Dec 2006 03:49:26 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
22 Dec 2006 12:15:01 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
24 Dec 2006 11:42:45 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:45:01 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
Pope Friction!
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
25 Dec 2006 01:24:33 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:42:45 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jueto2tf3chgs1l9ut7mipuqknpibrhgsk@4ax.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:45:01 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
Pope Friction!
Far, a long, long way to run
So? a lawyer pulling teeth
Laugh, a note to follow So
Tee, a nail to go in your head
That will bring us back to Dough (Stolen of course)
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
28 Dec 2006 03:49:37 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:54:33 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:42:45 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jueto2tf3chgs1l9ut7mipuqknpibrhgsk@4ax.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:45:01 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
Pope Friction!
Far, a long, long way to run
So? a lawyer pulling teeth
Laugh, a note to follow So
Tee, a nail to go in your head
That will bring us back to Dough (Stolen of course)
Look for Mr. Dolen
to find what was stollen
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
28 Dec 2006 04:38:43 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:49:37 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <eue8p2ta45bgcj7kf49avaf3m0i0uggno5@4ax.com>
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:54:33 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:42:45 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jueto2tf3chgs1l9ut7mipuqknpibrhgsk@4ax.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:45:01 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
Pope Friction!
Far, a long, long way to run
So? a lawyer pulling teeth
Laugh, a note to follow So
Tee, a nail to go in your head
That will bring us back to Dough (Stolen of course)
Look for Mr. Dolen
to find what was stollen
Not Mickey Dolenz?
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
31 Dec 2006 04:10:57 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:08:43 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:49:37 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <eue8p2ta45bgcj7kf49avaf3m0i0uggno5@4ax.com>
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:54:33 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:42:45 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jueto2tf3chgs1l9ut7mipuqknpibrhgsk@4ax.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:45:01 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
Pope Friction!
Far, a long, long way to run
So? a lawyer pulling teeth
Laugh, a note to follow So
Tee, a nail to go in your head
That will bring us back to Dough (Stolen of course)
Look for Mr. Dolen
to find what was stollen
Not Mickey Dolenz?
Nope. It's a mix of dough and stolen.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
31 Dec 2006 04:22:13 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:10:57 -0800, in alt.atheism
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
<kadgp2ta4omreo4i8ijj6a363e15ivs7sg@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:08:43 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:49:37 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <eue8p2ta45bgcj7kf49avaf3m0i0uggno5@4ax.com>
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:54:33 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:42:45 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jueto2tf3chgs1l9ut7mipuqknpibrhgsk@4ax.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:45:01 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
Pope Friction!
Far, a long, long way to run
So? a lawyer pulling teeth
Laugh, a note to follow So
Tee, a nail to go in your head
That will bring us back to Dough (Stolen of course)
Look for Mr. Dolen
to find what was stollen
Not Mickey Dolenz?
Nope. It's a mix of dough and stolen.
No, no, no. You're supposed to mix the dough with dried fruit and nuts
for stollen.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
02 Jan 2007 10:31:11 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:22:13 GMT, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:10:57 -0800, in alt.atheism
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
<kadgp2ta4omreo4i8ijj6a363e15ivs7sg@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:08:43 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:49:37 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <eue8p2ta45bgcj7kf49avaf3m0i0uggno5@4ax.com>
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:54:33 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:42:45 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jueto2tf3chgs1l9ut7mipuqknpibrhgsk@4ax.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:45:01 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
Pope Friction!
Far, a long, long way to run
So? a lawyer pulling teeth
Laugh, a note to follow So
Tee, a nail to go in your head
That will bring us back to Dough (Stolen of course)
Look for Mr. Dolen
to find what was stollen
Not Mickey Dolenz?
Nope. It's a mix of dough and stolen.
No, no, no. You're supposed to mix the dough with dried fruit and nuts
for stollen.
It doesn't matter how long you dry the nuts
the rabid christians remain toxic.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
01 Jan 2007 02:30:36 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:10:57 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <kadgp2ta4omreo4i8ijj6a363e15ivs7sg@4ax.com>
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:08:43 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:49:37 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <eue8p2ta45bgcj7kf49avaf3m0i0uggno5@4ax.com>
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:54:33 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:42:45 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jueto2tf3chgs1l9ut7mipuqknpibrhgsk@4ax.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:45:01 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:26 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <aa0mo2hboi3vsll6uskl0ou7avjarpr04m@4ax.com>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:14:56 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:56:25 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <vdc9o25df9be3cijsideb6d4hm5j2rq8h9@4ax.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:49 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:27 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:23:06 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:42 -0500, Eric Brze <brze@no.spam.mail.com>
wrote:
In other word, religion provides the evil doers the perfect place to
do evil in the name of God. Because they have done every evil thing in
the name of God, they will be judged by God for the every evil thing
they have done. A perfect curse they bring to themselves.
Only within the confines of your religion. For those not in your
religion the entire paragraph made no sense because 'evil', 'God' and
'curse' have no meaning. So the paragraph reads:
In other word, x provides the x doers the perfect place to
do x in the name of x. Because they have done every x thing in
the name of x, they will be judged by x for the every x thing
they have done. A perfect x they bring to themselves.
OW! My head hurts from the pretzeling.
Now you know what it means to have a cross to bear. :)
I guess that's better than having a cross bear.....
A bare cross would be even worse.
Splinterer!
Oh hang on, the crucifixion is crucial fiction!
Only if you heat it up.
Pope Fiction.
Pope Friction!
Far, a long, long way to run
So? a lawyer pulling teeth
Laugh, a note to follow So
Tee, a nail to go in your head
That will bring us back to Dough (Stolen of course)
Look for Mr. Dolen
to find what was stollen
Not Mickey Dolenz?
Nope. It's a mix of dough and stolen.
Enron.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
